Video: US is massing troops in South of Iraq, Koweit, Qatar, Eastern part of Saudi Arabia , Oman targeting Pakistan in Baluchistan

Gen. Hamid Gul: US will start WW3 if war expands to Pakistan

France-Israel en Algerie : Je publie le billet de l'israelien Raffarin sur ce blog, gardez ce billet au chaud, vous allez bien rire dans les semaines a venir

Message a l'israelien Raffarin et son pitre de service de Tel Aviv Lellouche. Tu te souviens de Chenot et Malbrunot en Iraq ? Tu l'as encore au travers de la gorge ? Alors mets toi bien dans la tete que la France-Israel n'aura rien au Maghreb tant que nos exigeances ne seront pas satisfaites et que Sarkozy se soumette integralement devant toute la planete, l'arrestation et le jugement de tous les criminels de guerre francais en commencant par lui. Et ce n'est ni l'agent de la DST-DCRI Ouyahia ni 'la voix de la France' Bouteflika qui te seront d'aucune aide. Sarkozy n'a pas d'argent pour 2012 et ca restera comme ca, qu'il se soumette en bonne et due forme. 'Declenchez donc vos bombes et campagnes terroristes', comme Lellouche l'a si bien rappelé il y a quelques jours, et nous verrons en combien de temps nous vous demonterons dans les rues de Paris.

Algérie : mission accomplie

Je rentre d’Alger en ayant le sentiment du travail accompli. En effet, l’été dernier, le Président Nicolas Sarkozy m’avait confié la mission de débloquer une douzaine de dossiers économiques majeurs, identifiés par les deux gouvernements. L’objectif était, au-delà de ces dossiers, de participer à l’émergence d’un nouveau climat partenarial entre nos deux Pays.

Sur les 12 projets, 9 ont été finalisés et les 3 derniers nécessitant plus de temps en raison de leur complexité industrielle sont cependant en bonne voie.

Au cours de cette mission le moment le plus émouvant a été, sans doute, le voyage d’essai que nous avons effectué, pour la première fois, dans le magnifique METRO d’Alger. L’objectif est la mise en service au 31 octobre prochain. C’est un projet pour lequel les Algérois sont légitiment impatients.

Après Sanofi, Cristal Union, La Macif, Alstom, la filière laitière… nous avons assisté à la signature des projets de Saint-Gobain et d’Axa… D’autres projets viennent compléter la liste : Danone, Bel, France Telecom, La Banque postale, Bull, Alcatel (cette dernière entreprise a réussi à me surprendre en présentant son projet… en anglais!), Suez environnement…

Ces résultats positifs ont créé un climat particulièrement favorable à la réussite du grand forum de PME, organisé par Ubi France-Futurallia. 600 entreprises algériennes et françaises ont ainsi participé à plus de 4500 rendez vous sélectionnés. Un record ! Le soutien et l’active participation de Pierre Lellouche, notre Ministre du commerce extérieur, ne sont pas étrangers à ce succès.

« Un climat d’apaisement et de pragmatisme » s’est ainsi affirmé. Ceci ouvre peut-être une nouvelle étape des relations économiques entre la France et l’Algerie. Signe de ce ton nouveau, le Premier ministre, Ahmed Ouyahia, s’est rendu, à mon invitation, à « la Résidence des oliviers », la résidence de France, pour un déjeuner de travail, accompagné de 5 de ses Ministres. Une première depuis 1962. Sur plusieurs dossiers, j’ai été le témoin de la bonne volonté des Algériens, il reste cependant beaucoup à faire de part et d’ autre pour rendre notre coopération plus fluide. La confiance dans cette dynamique nouvelle exprimée par les patrons de PME est aussi un facteur encourageant.

Pour ce travail, je remercie particulièrement mon Ami Mohamed Benmeradi dont je salue la détermination et la gentillesse et les différentes autorités algériennes qui sont intervenues.

Côté français ma gratitude va notamment aux Ambassadeurs Xavier Driencourt et Serge Degallaix et au Chef du service économique Marc Bouteiller et les différentes équipes opérationnelles.

http://www.carnetjpr.com/

We are heading towards a large military conflict in North Africa this Summer where Israel, France, UK, US, Italy, NATO will try to take full posession of North African oil, gas, water resources using the civil war they had created in Libya as an excuse and try to subdue the Arab and Muslim masses to Israel.

Abu-Suleyman10:43 AM1 comment

Britain launches ground Libya invasion

British special forces operate in Libya as undercover private security firms. The UK military is carrying out a secret ground war in Libya as part of the NATO military alliances' scheme to prolong the occupation of the North African country.

Former members of Britain's special forces, better known as SAS, and other western employees of private security companies are helping NATO in its reconnaissance operations in and around the Libyan city of Misrata, the dailyThe Guardian reported.

A senior British military source said the elite unit of former SAS troops, which is funded by the Ministry of Defence (MoD), represents Britain; this comes as Prime Minister David Cameron insists that no British boots are on the ground in Libya.

According to The Guardian, these former SAS troops are operating in Libya in close collaboration with Britain, France and other NATO countries, and have been supplied with the most modern communication equipments to pass details of the locations and movements of Colonel Gaddafi's forces to the Naples headquarters of NATO in Italy.

The NATO command then verifies the targets by spy planes and US Predator drones and launches aerial attacks on them, the report said.

This is while that NATO warplanes and fighter jets have pounded the revolutionary forces' positions for several times so far and practically hampered their advance towards the capital Tripoli.

There have also been several reports of civilian deaths caused by NATO attacks, which have been confirmed by the revolutionaries.

Footage of 11 ex-SAS and Parachute Regiment troops in Libya was aired by Arab TV station al-Jazeera in Dafniya, which is the western-most point of the revolutionary lines west of Misrata.

Highly trained with front line experience round the world, they are the UK's unofficial boots on the ground, which has been in the country for the past four weeks.

Their presence is an incredibly sensitive subject as the UN Security Council resolution in March authorising the use of force against Gaddafi specifically excludes “a foreign occupation force of any form on any Libyan territory.”

“These men definitely did not want to be seen by prying eyes as it could compromise their mission, which is very unofficial,” said the senior military source.

“But the fact is that they are representing Britain - whether it has been denied or not - and the British government has given the green light for this, via a circuitous route,” the source added.

“They are Brits and they are being paid for indirectly by the British taxpayer to a private company, whether the money was paid via a third or even fourth party,” said the source.

The ex-SAS troops - who are claimed to earn as much as £10,000 a month as third party “freelances” - were seen in action in Iraq, Afghanistan, Columbia and Northern Ireland. Their wages have been paid to the private firm indirectly from a British government fund.

The NATO military alliance is working on a plan to prolong the war in Libya in its bid to broaden its military occupation of the country, according to the report.

This is while the MoD has stressed that there are no combat troops on the ground in Libya, saying that the only MoD personnel in the country includes 10 military advisors and mentors in Benghazi.

William Hague, the foreign secretary, described the advisers as "experienced military officers", and said they would advise the revolutionaries on intelligence gathering, logistics and communications.

These private soldiers are reported to be paid by Arab countries, notably Qatar, the report said.

The UN Security Council resolution No. 1973 has only authorised the western military alliance to enforce a no-fly zone over Libya to protect its civilians from being slaughtered at the hands of the country's long-time dictator, stressing that no foreign boots should touch the Libyan soil.

But, it seems that the western alliance including Britain is resorting to private security firms in an attempt to get rid of the restrictions implied by the Security Council resolution.

The North African country is practically divided into two separate entities after western counties invaded it more than two months ago, something which had happened in Libya when it was a UK colony.

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/182744.html

If Arab Spring threatens Israel, why does Saban support it?

Abu-Suleyman9:40 AMNo comments

By Maidhc Ó Cathail

Posted on June 1, 2011 by Maidhc Ó Cathail

“The test of a first-rate intelligence,” F. Scott Fitzgerald famously wrote, “is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function.” When it comes to what’s been dubbed the “Arab Spring,” most Middle East analysts pass Fitzgerald’s test with flying colours.

Hardly anyone would dispute the claim that Haim Saban cares deeply about Israel. After all, the Egyptian-born Israeli-American media mogul has admitted to the New York Times, “I’m a one-issue guy and my issue is Israel.”

A New Yorker profile last year elaborated: “His greatest concern, he says, is to protect Israel, by strengthening the United States-Israel relationship. At a conference last fall in Israel, Saban described his formula. His ‘three ways to be influential in American politics,’ he said, were: make donations to political parties, establish think tanks, and control media outlets.”

The think tank part of Saban’s tripartite Israel-protection formula was initiated in 2002 with a pledge of nearly $13 million to the Brookings Institution to establish the Saban Center for Middle East Policy. In 2007, the Saban Center expanded operations with the launch of the Brookings Doha Center. Its Qatar-based project was inaugurated in February 2008 by the founding director of the Saban Center, Martin Indyk. A former research director at the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), Indyk had previously founded the AIPAC-created Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP).

All three experts at the Brookings Doha Center—its director, deputy director and director of research—are fellows at the pro-Israel Saban Center, while two of the three have close ties to Washington’s “democracy promotion” establishment. The center’s deputy director, Ibrahim Sharqieh, previously managed a long term USAID development project in Yemen, as well as a U.S. State Department Middle East Partnership Initiative (MEPI) civic education project. According to a March 12 report in the Washington Post detailing U.S. support for Arab democrats, USAID grants “proved vital to activists in a half-dozen Arab lands,” financing, for example, the training by groups such as the National Democratic Institute (NDI), the International Republican Institute (IRI) and Freedom House of up to 80 percent of the leaders of the Egyptian uprising. MEPI, according to an April 18 Washington Post report, has funneled up to $6 million to Syrian opposition groups since 2006. As further testament to Haim Saban’s contribution to Middle East democracy, MEPI is currently headed by Tamara Wittes, formerly director of the Saban Center’s Middle East Democracy and Development (MEDD) Project.

Shadi Hamid, the Doha center’s director of research, is aptly described as an expert on democratization in the Middle East. Prior to working for the Saban Center, he was a Hewlett Fellow at Stanford University’s Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law (CDDRL). CDDRL’s director, Larry Diamond, is the founding co-editor of the National Endowment for Democracy’s Journal of Democracy and a longtime advocate of Arab democracy. Hamid was also director of research at the Project on Middle East Democracy (POMED), whose board of advisors, reading like a who’s who of the democracy promotion establishment, includes Diamond and the NDI and IRI presidents. Hamid has also served as a program specialist on public diplomacy at the U.S. State Department. James Glassman, the former Undersecretary for Public Diplomacy who brought Middle Eastern pro-democracy activists to New York for the inaugural Alliance of Youth Movements (AYM) summit in 2008, viewed public diplomacy as “the direct or indirect engagement of foreign publics to support national security objectives,” while observing that “it’s a lot easier to be influential when others are making the pronouncements.”

On its international advisory council, the Brookings Doha Center boasts such luminaries of democracy promotion as Madeleine Albright. The former U.S. secretary of state currently chairs the NDI, the Democratic affiliate of the quasi-governmental National Endowment for Democracy (NED). As Kenneth Timmerman candidly admitted in 2009, “The National Endowment for Democracy has spent millions of dollars during the past decade promoting ‘color’ revolutions in places such as Ukraine and Serbia, training political workers in modern communications and organizational techniques.” During the protests in Egypt, Albright was interviewed by Rachel Maddow on MSNBC, one of the corporate sponsors of Movements.org, the AYM’s online hub which supports the activities of pro-democracy digital activists. Considering her lack of scruples about the sanctions-induced deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children, Albright’s condemnation of the Mubarak regime’s brutality has to be taken with a grain of salt. More importantly, however, the NDI chair acknowledged that her democracy-promoting organization had been “working within Egypt for a long time.”

From the beginning of the Arab uprisings, the Brookings Doha Center has been churning out commentaries with titles like “Saleh Falls,” “In Syria, Assad Must Exit the Stage” and “If United States Doesn’t Make Qaddafi Go, Who Will?” which leave little doubt about their stance. In a recent Washington Post report, which reads more like an editorial in support of the Arab Spring, the center’s director, Salman Shaikh, warns, “If these Arab revolutions do become a footnote, and if people do become frustrated and see no light at the end of the tunnel, I don’t know where it could lead in terms of people thinking of al-Qaeda.”

Yet few Middle East observers seem to be asking: If the Arab Spring is backed so unreservedly by Haim Saban’s think tank, which was created to protect Israel, then how could it possibly threaten Israeli interests?

Maidhc Ó Cathail is an investigative journalist and Middle East analyst.

http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/1993

Chicago’s Aon Center Alert 6/3/11 – 6/9/11

Abu-Suleyman7:42 AMNo comments

By Captain Eric H. May, Staff Writer

FRIDAY, 6/3/11 — The danger of a terror attack against the Aon Center in Chicago is considerable from 6/3/11 through 6/9/11, according to intelligence sources in the Chicago area speaking with Veterans Today on condition of anonymity.

They say that Aon Center has replaced Willis (Sears) Tower, as the primary Chicago target, as demonstrated by terror training conducted there May 17, according to Security Director News in its article, Third tallest building in Chicago enhances security, conducts fire evacuation drills.

The Tuesday training took place the day after three important events on Monday, May 16, which sources say may have been connected with the emergency exercise:

Rahm Emanuel became Chicago’s first Jewish mayor.
National Level Exercise 2011 began, scripting disasters and terror throughout the Mississippi Valley and Great Lakes, including Chicago.
Space Shuttle Endeavour launched into its last mission.

A month ago, Emanuel chose Gene McCarthy, the NYPD police official with Mayor Rudy Giuliani on 9/11, as his top cop. He next chose Michael Masters to head Cook County Homeland Security. Masters, a longtime Chicago Police Department official and a leading member of the city’s Jewish community, was working Emanuel’s agenda within the CPD for two months before McCarthy’s arrival.

Asked about the 6/3 : 6/9 danger period, sources called it a matter of terror number coding, a taboo subject, for the most part, since the day of the first Mumbai terror attack. That was when ABC ran the 2006 story, New York, 9/ll; Madrid, 3/11; Mumbai, 7/ll, about FBI terror target assessment techniques based on number analysis.

Ironically, later that day, Chicago Transit Authority commuter train 220 derailed and caught fire, causing many of the 1,000 passengers to fear that they were following the Mumbai terror script. The Israeli invasion of Lebanon, occurring hours later, turned national attention away from the Midwest and into the Mideast.
Asked if 11-based coding could be a factor in current fears, sources provided curious coincidences:

The Aoh Center is 1136 feet tall, which is today’s date, 6/3/11 backwards. Terrorists have an obsession with such numbers, felling the Twin Towers exactly 33 years and 33 days after the 8/8/68 beginning of above-ground construction on WTC-1.
Both of the Twin Towers were 110 stories, as is Willis Tower. The Aon Center has five underground floors along with 83 above, totaling 88. “The 11-multiple towers just seem to be terror bait,” they agreed.
6/5/11 will be the 44th anniversary of Israel’s Six-Day War in 1967, and 6/8/11 will be the 44th anniversary of Israel’s notorious attack on the USS Liberty. Anniversary attacks are common, sources said, citing the 9/11/01 attacks, which befell New York on the fourth anniversary of its 9/11/97 dedication of its holocaust museum.
6/9/11, Thursday, is the same number as the 6911 deaths officially reported one week after the Great Japan Earthquake of 3/11/11. Asked whether we should worry about 6/11/11, they declined to speculate.

* Veterans Today fact-checked all dates and numbers before publishing this article, and found them to be correct..

Provocations sionistes et preparation a la venue du Dajjal : Les Sionistes mettent une miniature de leur prétendu temple pres de la moquée Al Aqsa

Abu-Suleyman9:31 AMNo comments

Cheikh Al-Khattib appelle toute la nation à réagir pour reprendre Al-Quds et la mosquée d’Al-Aqsa

Al-Quds occupée – CPI

www.palestine-info.info

Cheikh Kamal Al-Khattib, vice-président du Mouvement Islamique dans les territoires occupés en 1948, a dit que l’occupation israélienne prendra fin comme cela a été le cas pour les autres occupations. Il a appelé la nation, toute la nation, à reprendre la ville d'Al-Quds et la sainte mosquée d’Al-Aqsa.

Cheikh Khattib parlait à l’institut Al-Aqsa pour les legs et le patrimoine à l’occasion de la 44^ème commémoration de l’occupation de la partie est de la ville d'Al-Quds et de la sainte mosquée d’Al-Aqsa. Il a appelé tous les Arabes, tous les Musulmans, tous les Palestiniens à travailler pour reprendre la ville d'Al-Quds et la mosquée d’Al-Aqsa, sans qu’ils ne soient dupes face aux allégations de paix d’Obama.

L’occupation israélienne a travaillé depuis 44 ans à judaïser la ville d'Al-Quds, mais cette ville a résisté à tous les envahisseurs et tous les occupants. La ville d'Al-Quds restera musulmane, arabe et palestinienne. Toutes les falsifications pratiquées par les autorités de l’occupation israélienne ne pourront rien changer.

Et quant aux groupes sionistes qui ont dansé dans les rues de la ville d'Al-Quds et ont insulté le prophète Mohammed (P), mercredi dernier, Al-Khattib a dit que ces manifestations reflètent la manière dont les occupants israéliens se mettent en conflit avec 400 millions d’Arabes et 1500 millions de Musulmans ; ils seront certainement les perdants.

Al-Quds occupée – CPI

La caméra du photographe palestinien Afif Hanna Amira a capté, jeudi 2 juin 2011, l’image d’une miniature du prétendu temple, installée sur la porte Damas, connue sous le nom de porte Al-Amoud, une porte principale de l’ancien bourg de la ville d'Al-Quds.

Le centre Al-Quds pour les droits sociaux et économiques a publié la photo et l’a mise de manière à ne pas être vue par les autorités.

Il est à noter que la mairie israélienne de la ville d'Al-Quds et l’autorité des patrimoines sionistes entament des travaux sur le mur de l’ancienne ville d'Al-Quds.

Les habitants de la ville regardent ces travaux avec beaucoup de suspicion, surtout que sur certains endroits, les pierres originales sont retirées avant d’être remplacées par d’autres pour que le mur ressemble au mur de leur prétendu temple ; cela a été le cas pour un endroit près de la porte Al-Sahira.

Provocations sionistes et preparation a la venue du Dajjal : Les Sionistes mettent une miniature de leur prétendu temple pres de la moquée Al Aqsa

Abu-Suleyman9:31 AMNo comments

Cheikh Al-Khattib appelle toute la nation à réagir pour reprendre Al-Quds et la mosquée d’Al-Aqsa

Al-Quds occupée – CPI

www.palestine-info.info

Al-Quds occupée – CPI

Le centre Al-Quds pour les droits sociaux et économiques a publié la photo et l’a mise de manière à ne pas être vue par les autorités.

Il est à noter que la mairie israélienne de la ville d'Al-Quds et l’autorité des patrimoines sionistes entament des travaux sur le mur de l’ancienne ville d'Al-Quds.

Libyan people money stolen by French, British, American and Israeli Zionist banksters to finance the presidential campaigns of Obama, Sarkozy in 2012 and Cameron in the UK for 2011. Al Qaeddafi gave the money of the Libyans to their worst enemy on earth, placing Libya under direct Israel control, both camps in Benghazi and Tripoli are working for the Zionist agenda, slaughtering the innocent people !

Abu-Suleyman11:41 AMNo comments

Gaddafi’s Stolen Billions: Max Keiser Explains ‘Financial Terrorism’

Second part below:

http://maxkeiser.com/2011/06/03/gaddafis-stolen-billions-max-keiser-explains-financial-terrorism/

Israel souhaite reformer l'Islaam de l'interieur en creant 'un super-vatican' basé a la Mecque (Etat Sacré Islamique sur la carte) pour soumettre le monde Musulman a la pax talmudica

Abu-Suleyman12:24 PMNo comments

Le Nouvel ordre mondial à l’assaut de l’Islam, par Pierre Hillard

Par Pierre Hillard, docteur en science politique^[1] et essayiste français.

Frémissant fin 2010 et désormais bouillonnant depuis 2011, le monde musulman connaît des bouleversements qui ont pris de court les diplomaties de tous les continents. Des manifestations de masse secouent les structures politiques héritées de la Seconde guerre mondiale ou de la décolonisation. Sur fond de pauvreté et de corruption généralisées, les foules sunnites et chiites exigent un changement radical. La démocratie, des élections libres, une plus grande liberté des médias et autres éléments propres à l’épanouissement de l’homme doivent désormais régir les structures politiques musulmanes.

Ces revendications ne peuvent que satisfaire les dirigeants et les opinions publiques des nations européennes et américaines. Cependant, cette présentation idyllique se doit d’être vue sous l’angle de la réalité politique. En effet, « la comédie humaine », chère aux romans d’Honoré de Balzac, nous a appris que les grands événements sont toujours le fruit des actions d’une élite. Les masses ont toujours été utilisées comme instrument en faveur d’une politique bien définie. « Agitez le peuple avant de s’en servir » comme se plaisait à le rappeler le diplomate Charles-Maurice de Talleyrand qui, en ce domaine, s’y entendait.

L’architecture générale du nouvel ordre mondial en préparation

Pour mieux comprendre les bouleversements en cours dans les pays musulmans, nous devons aller du général au particulier. En effet, la trame de fond à l’origine de tous ces événements réside dans le développement du nouvel ordre mondial qui est plus qu’une idéologie ; c’est une mystique. Il s’agit de favoriser partout l’émergence de blocs continentaux européen, africain, Nord-américain ou Sud-américain politiquement unifiés et régis par des lois communes. L’ensemble de ces blocs doit constituer l’architecture générale d’une gouvernance mondiale réunissant une humanité indifférenciée et nomade. Cette politique prend déjà forme avec la création d’une assemblée parlementaire mondiale au sein des Nations Unies (APNU : Assemblée Parlementaire des Nations Unies)[1] sous la direction de l’Allemand Andréas Bummel[2].

Une monnaie mondiale doit structurer l’ensemble. Le FMI a déjà annoncé la couleur en avril 2010 en plaidant en faveur d’une monnaie planétaire (le Bancor) régie par une banque centrale mondiale (Reserve accumulation and International Monetary Stability)[3]. Ceci implique l’abandon du dollar et une réforme complète du système financier mondial. Cependant, cette construction babélienne ne peut s’élever qu’à la condition d’imposer une uniformisation des esprits. Une unité de pensée, des réflexes psychologiques communs, un esprit consumériste et un hédonisme effréné doivent codifier les ressorts profonds de l’âme humaine. Or, dans cette affaire, l’Islam ne rentre pas dans cette configuration.

Cette opposition est renforcée par une caractéristique fondamentale de l’Islam par rapport au monde occidental. En effet, les pays issus du résidu de civilisation chrétienne reposent sur la distinction entre le temporel et le spirituel. En revanche, la religion musulmane n’obéit pas à cette caractéristique en fusionnant le temporel et le spirituel. L’Islam est en même temps une foi et une loi. C’est pour cette raison que la société civile, par exemple, n’a jamais pu naître en terre d’Islam. Cette présentation factuelle est indispensable à retenir car elle permet de comprendre que ces deux mondes sont sur des parallèles civilisationnelles.

Au lendemain de la chute du mur de Berlin, les élites anglo-saxonnes ont accéléré le rythme en permettant l’édification d’une Union européenne assujettie à leurs intérêts[4] en coopération avec l’Allemagne[5]. Cette Union européenne doit, théoriquement pour 2015, constituer un partenariat transatlantique complet[6] avec le Nouveau monde qui lui-même est appelé à s’unifier dans le cadre d’une Union nord-américaine[7] selon les vœux du Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)[8]. Cependant, face à la montée en puissance du monde asiatique, en priorité chinois, Londres et Washington veulent s’assurer le contrôle complet des hydrocarbures en provenance des pays Sud-méditerranéens et du Proche-Orient. L’indépendance acquise du Sud-Soudan avec le soutien intéressé des Anglo-Saxons s’explique en raison de riches réserves pétrolières qui, désormais, échappent à Pékin. Cette politique en direction de l’Afrique du Nord et du Proche-Orient fut appuyée dès 1995 par l’Union européenne qui lança le « Processus de Barcelone »[9]. L’objectif officiel était : 1) la définition d’un espace commun de paix et de stabilité ; 2) la construction d’une zone de prospérité partagée avec l’instauration progressive d’une zone de libre-échange ; enfin 3) le rapprochement entre les peuples.

En raison de résultats peu probants, la Commission européenne passa à la vitesse supérieure en 2003 en lançant la « Politique européenne de voisinage » (PEV)[10]. Cette dernière consiste à imposer aux pays du pourtour Sud-méditerranéens le modèle euro-atlantiste en leur présentant toute une série de normes à intégrer : l’économie de marché, le respect des droits de l’homme ou encore l’Etat de droit. Dans l’esprit des concepteurs européistes, des normes communes doivent gérer tous les pays de part et d’autre de la Méditerranée. Une intégration complète doit conduire à l’union d’un Occident « civilisé » à celui d’un Orient « compliqué ». En fait, en filigrane, ce qui nous est proposé, c’est la tentative de restauration de l’Empire romain soudée à une excroissance géographique Nord-américaine. En matière d’intégration, les textes de la PEV sont très clairs. Ils stipulent : « Le concept qui se trouve ancré dans la politique européenne de voisinage est celui d’un cercle de pays partageant les valeurs et objectifs fondamentaux de l’UE et s’engageant dans une relation de plus en plus étroite allant au-delà de la coopération, c’est-à-dire impliquant un niveau d’intégration économique et politique important »[11].

En raison de cette dynamique, il fut décidé en 2007 la création d’une Union pour la Méditerranée sous l’impulsion du président Sarkozy. L’objectif officiel était de renforcer et d’accélérer le processus d’intégration des deux rives de la Méditerranée. Cependant, le projet fut fondamentalement remanié sous la pression de la chancelière Merkel appuyée par la Fondation Bertelsmann[12]. En effet, en raison du poids croissant de l’Allemagne en Europe centrale et orientale, les autorités françaises ont cherché à contrebalancer cette tendance en créant une forme de Mitteleuropa Sud-méditerranéenne sous la seule influence de la France. Dans la première mouture d’Union pour la Méditerranée, seuls les pays riverains étaient intégrés au club. Flairant une politique de création de zone d’influence contraire à ses intérêts, Berlin exigea et obtint que tous les pays de l’UE participent à cette Union pour la Méditerranée. Comme le précisa clairement la chancelière : « Si par exemple, nous construisons une Union pour la Méditerranée qui verrait uniquement la participation des Etats riverains de la Méditerranée disposant des instruments financiers de l’Union européenne, je le dis tout net ; d’autres diront : nous devons mettre sur pied une Union de l’Europe de l’Est avec par exemple, l’Ukraine (…).

Alors, il se passera quelque chose que je tiens pour très dangereux. Il se pourrait que l’Allemagne se sente plus concernée de son côté par les pays d’Europe centrale et orientale tandis que la France, elle, se tourne du côté de la Méditerranée. Cela réveillerait des tensions à l’intérieur que je ne veux pas. C’est pourquoi, il faut être clair : la responsabilité à l’égard de la Méditerranée est aussi l’affaire d’un Européen du Nord au même titre que l’avenir des frontières de la Russie et de l’Ukraine est l’affaire de ceux originaires de la Méditerranée. Si nous n’arrivons pas à arrêter ce mouvement, alors l’Union européenne à mon sens retournerait à son stade primitif (…) »[13]. Le président Sarkozy s’inclina permettant à l’Allemagne, principal contributeur financier européen, de faire d’une pierre deux coups : maintien de son influence en l’Europe de l’Est tout en étendant et renforçant ses liens vers le Sud de la Méditerranée. Désormais baptisé « Processus de Barcelone : Union pour la Méditerranée », cette victoire allemande fut le 1870 de la diplomatie française.

La destruction programmée

En fait, le lancement officiel de la politique de déstructuration étatique et civilisationnelle des pays musulmans du Maroc à l’Afghanistan peut être daté au 7 février 2004. En effet, lors de la 40è Conférence de Munich sur la politique de sécurité sous l’égide de l’OTAN[14], Joschka Fischer, ministre des Affaires étrangères du chancelier Schröder, présenta un véritable programme politique à appliquer aux pays musulmans de concert avec les Etats-Unis. Porte-parole des travaux de différents think tanks américains (Rand, Canergie Endowment, National Endowment for Democracy, …)[15] ou allemands (la Fondation Bertelsmann, …)[16], Joschka Fischer rappela la nécessité d’une « stratégie commune » euro-américaine en deux points : 1) le lancement d’un processus méditerranéen commun de l’OTAN et de l’Union européenne ; 2) une « Déclaration pour un avenir commun » pour tous les pays du Proche et Moyen-Orient. Outre l’imposition de réformes touchant les domaines politiques, économiques et militaires à l’image des pays du bloc euro-atlantique, le ministre allemand proposa une refonte complète du système juridique, éducatif et social, la création d’ONG ainsi que le développement de la société civile, du dialogue interreligieux, la promotion des droits de l’homme en général et de l’égalité homme/femme en particulier pour l’ensemble du monde musulman. Toutes ces mesures doivent, selon l’expression même du ministre, favoriser « l’intégration de leurs économies », le tout reposant « sur la conviction que la modernisation du Proche-Orient élargi sera décisive pour notre sécurité commune au XXIè siècle. Faire participer les populations du Proche et Moyen-Orient aux conquêtes de la mondialisation est donc dans notre plus grand intérêt »[17].

Ces mesures révolutionnaires destinées à fondre le monde musulman dans les principes euro-atlantistes et mondialistes furent confirmées, le 27 février 2004, lors de la signature de « l’Alliance germano-américaine pour le XXIè siècle »[18] à Washington entre le chancelier Schröder et le président Bush. Outre le rappel des mesures proclamées à Munich, il est clairement affiché que : « Nous devons construire un véritable partenariat qui relie l’Europe et l’Amérique aux pays du Proche et Moyen-Orient afin de travailler ensemble avec les pays et les peuples de cette région dans un cadre permettant d’atteindre des buts ciblés et de vivre paisiblement les uns à côté des autres (…) ».

En fait, ces affirmations épousent parfaitement les objectifs de la politique du « Grand Moyen-Orient » lancée par l’administration Bush, désormais baptisée « Nouveau Moyen-Orient » (New Middle East) sous le plume de Richard Haass président du CFR dans la revue Foreign Affairs en 2006[19]. Cette coopération euro-américaine est d’autant plus significative qu’elle se retrouve dans les travaux de la Fondation Bertelsmann qui a développé une double politique à l’égard d’Israël et du monde musulman. Dans un premier temps, il s’agit dans le cadre du « Dialogue germano-juif »[20] d’intégrer Israël à l’architecture politique, économique et militaire euro-atlantique. L’Etat hébreu doit constituer un pilier du judaïsme en liaison avec deux autres piliers : les judaïsmes européen et américain. Dans un deuxième temps, cette politique ne peut se concrétiser qu’à la condition de réussir à arrimer le monde musulman à cette construction géopolitique. C’est tout l’enjeu des « Discussions de Kronberg »[21] qui, depuis 1995, permettent des discussions entre euro-américains et élites musulmanes afin d’inciter ces dernières à adopter les principes politico-philosophiques des euro-atlantistes dans les structures internes des pays d’Afrique du Nord et du Proche-Orient. Or, ces discussions achoppent en raison de la fusion du spirituel et du temporel propre à l’Islam. Et c’est là où les autorités américaines ont d’une certaine manière lâché le morceau.

Le Vatican II de l’Islam

En juin 2006, un article intitulé « Frontières de sang » sous la signature de Ralph Peters et paru dans la revue militaire américaine Armed Forces Journal (AFJ), a présenté une carte recomposant le Proche-Orient en fonction des critères ethniques et religieux[22]. Tous ces pays voient leurs frontières bouleversées. En fait, son auteur s’inspire largement des travaux de l’islamologue britannique proche de Zbigniew Brzezinski (conseiller du président Obama), Bernard Lewis. Ce dernier est l’auteur de l’expression « Choc des civilisations »[23] reprise avec succès par Samuel Huntington. Pour Bernard Lewis, il s’agit de balkaniser le monde musulman afin de créer de mini-Etats pétroliers plus faciles à contrôler. Un modèle de restructuration appelé « arc de crise » fut présenté dans la revue « Time » en janvier 1979[24]. Cette recomposition complète repose sur le principe du « divisez pour mieux régner ». Cependant, derrière l’aspect politico-économique, la mystique mondialiste s’attaque au cœur du monde musulman concernant un point méconnu de nos sociétés matérialistes. En effet, la nouvelle carte présente un remaniement révolutionnaire : un « Etat sacré islamique » regroupant Médine et la Mecque au sein d’une Arabie Saoudite complètement désarticulée et dont l’éclatement aurait de fatales répercussions sur l’économie mondiale (grandes difficultés d’approvisionnement en pétrole) et sur la stabilité du dollar. Comme le précise son auteur : « La cause principale de la large stagnation du monde musulman réside dans le traitement réservé à la Mecque et à Médine considérés comme leur fief par la famille saoudienne. Les lieux saints de l’Islam soumis au contrôle de la police d’Etat de la part d’un des plus bigots et oppressifs régimes au monde ont permis au Saoud (ndlr : la famille régnante d’Arabie Saoudite) de projeter leur croyance wahhabite à la fois intolérante et disciplinée au-delà de leurs frontières. (…) Imaginez comme le monde musulman se sentirait mieux si la Mecque et Médine étaient dirigés par un Conseil représentatif tournant issu des principales écoles et mouvements de l’Islam dans le monde au sein d’un Etat sacré islamique – une sorte de super Vatican musulman – où l’avenir de la foi serait débattu au lieu d’être arbitrairement fixé »[25].

En effet, parler de l’intégration du monde musulman à l’axe euro-atlantique et aux principes du nouvel ordre mondial signifie que cela ne peut se faire qu’à la condition de modifier radicalement leurs référents religieux et, par ricochet, politiques, économiques, sociaux et psychologiques. La mystique mondialiste veut imposer son baptême permettant la mise en forme d’un panthéisme. La création d’un « Etat sacré de l’Islam » et d’un « Conseil représentatif tournant » en mesure de modifier la religion de l’intérieur correspond à l’instauration d’un Vatican II de l’Islam. Pour rappel, les préceptes de l’Eglise catholique étant incompatibles avec la doxa mondialiste, il fut nécessaire de favoriser un aggiornamento complet grâce à Vatican II (1962-1965) afin de permettre aux successeurs de saint Pierre de soumettre la doctrine catholique à l’idéologie mondialiste dans le cadre d’une Agapè inversée et célébrée dans le Temple des Nations Unies. Ce fut affirmé sans ambiguïtés par Jean XXIII qui, dans son encyclique Pacem in terris de 1963[26], rappelait la nécessité d’un « pouvoir supranational ou mondial » qui ne soit pas institué de force permettant « l’établissement d’une organisation juridico-politique de la communauté mondiale ». Cette affirmation fut reprise par Benoît XVI qui n’hésita pas à encourager l’humanité à s’engager « dans l’édification d’un nouvel ordre mondial » dans son message de Noël en 2005[27]. Ce pape réitéra son engagement, dans son encyclique Veritas in caritate de 2009, en appelant à créer une « autorité politique mondiale » en liaison avec l’ONU[28]. C’est la même démarche qui attend les pays musulmans si le projet consistant à entièrement déstructurer cette zone géographique du Maroc à l’Afghanistan arrive à son terme. Cette politique de dissolution et de recomposition doit favoriser les luttes entre sunnites et chiites, entre musulmans et chrétiens et conduire à une confrontation brutale avec le sionisme. De ce magma en fusion, un « Islam des Lumières » doit théoriquement émerger du chaos engendré par la mystique mondialiste afin de l’intégrer aux dogmes de la gouvernance mondiale. L’heure de vérité a sonné. Finalement, les auteurs de ce drame aux conséquences incalculables (politiques, économiques, énergétiques et en vies humaines) suivent à la lettre les fameux vers du poème de Goethe, « L’apprenti sorcier », qui rappelaient : « Les esprits que j’ai réveillés ne veulent plus m’écouter ».

Pierre Hillard
(mecanopolis.org)

Pierre Hillard est l’auteur de « La marche irrésistible du nouvel ordre mondial », aux Editions François-Xavier de Guibert

Israelis Rush for Second Passports

Abu-Suleyman4:28 PMNo comments

"Perhaps as many as half of the Jews living in Israel will consider leaving Palestine in the next few years if political and social trends continue."

By FRANKLIN LAMB
Beirut

Perhaps historians or cultural anthropologists surveying the course of human events can identify for us a land, in addition to Palestine, where such a large percentage of a recently arrived colonial population prepared to exercise their right to depart, while many more, with actual millennial roots but victims of ethnic cleansing, prepared to exercise their right of Return.

One of the many ironies inherent in the 19^th century Zionist colonial enterprise in Palestine is the fact that this increasingly fraying project was billed for most of the 20th century as a haven in the Middle East for “returning” persecuted European Jews. But today, in the 21^st century, it is Europe that is increasingly being viewed by a large number of the illegal occupiers of Palestinian land as the much desired haven for returning Middle Eastern Jews.

To paraphrase Jewish journalist Gideon Levy “If our forefathers dreamt of an Israeli passport to escape from Europe, there are many among us who are now dreaming of a second passport to escape to Europe.

Several studies in Israel and one conducted by AIPAC and another by the Jewish National Fund in Germany show that perhaps as many as half of the Jews living in Israel will consider leaving Palestine in the next few years if current political and social trends continue. A 2008 survey by the Jerusalem-based Menachem Begin Heritage Center found that 59% of Israelis had approached or intended to approach a foreign embassy to inquire about or apply for citizenship and a passport. Today it is estimated that the figure is approaching 70%.

The number of Israelis thinking of leaving Palestine is climbing rapidly according to researchers at Bar-Ilan University who conducted a study published recently in Eretz Acheret, (“A Different Place”) an Israeli NGO that claims to promote cultural dialogue. What the Bar-Ilan study found is that more than 100,000 Israelis already hold a German passport, and this figure increases by more than 7,000 every year along an accelerating trajectory. According to German officials, more than 70,000 such passports have been granted since 2000.

In addition to Germany, there are more than one million Israelis with other foreign passports at the ready in case life in Israel deteriorates. One of the most appealing countries for Israelis contemplating emigration, as well as perhaps the most welcoming, is the United States. Currently more than 500,000 Israelis hold US passports with close to a quarter million pending applications.

During the recent meetings in Washington DC between Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s delegation and Israel’s US agents, assurances were reportedly given by AIPAC officials that if and when it becomes necessary, the US government will expeditiously issue American passports to any and all Israeli Jews seeking them.

Israeli Arabs need not apply.

AIPAC also represented to their Israeli interrogators that the US Congress could be trusted to approve funding for arriving Israeli Jews “to be allocated substantial cash resettlement grants to ease transition into their new country.”

Apart from the Israeli Jews who may be thinking of getting an “insurance passport” for a Diaspora land, there is a similar percentage of Jews worldwide who aren't going to make aliyah. According to Jonathan Rynhold, a Bar Ilan professor specializing on U.S.-Israel relations, Jews may be safer in Teheran than Ashkelon these days—until Israel or the USA starts bombing Iran.

Interviews with some of those who either helped conduct the above noted studies or have knowledge of them, identify several factors that explain the Israeli rush for foreign passports, some rather surprising, given the ultra-nationalist Israeli culture.

The common denominator is unease and anxiety, both personal and national, with the second passport considered a kind of insurance policy “for the rainy days visible on the horizon,” as one researcher from Eretz Acheret explained.

Other factors include:

The fact that two or three generations in Israel has not proven enough to implant roots where few if any existed before. For this reason Israel has produced a significant percentage of “re-immigration” — a return of immigrants or their descendants to their country of origin which Zionist propaganda to the contrary notwithstanding, is not Palestine.

Fear that religious fanatics from among the more than 600,000 settlers in the West Bank will create civil war and essentially annex pre-1967 Israel and turn Israel more toward an ultra-fascist state.

Centripetal pressures within Israeli society, especially among Russian immigrants who overwhelmingly reject Zionism. Since the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, some one million Jews have come to Israel from the former Soviet Union, enlarging the country's population by 25 percent and forming the largest concentration in the world of Russian Jews.But today, Russian Jews comprise the largest group emigrating from Israel and they have been returning in droves for reasons ranging from opposition to Zionism, discrimination, and broken promises regarding employment and “the good life” in Israel.

Approximately 200,000 or 22% of Russians coming to Israel since 1990 have so far returned to their country. According to Rabbi Berel Larzar, who has been Russia’s chief Rabbi since 2000, "It's absolutely extraordinary how many people are returning. When Jews left, there was no community, no Jewish life. People felt that being Jewish was an historical mistake that happened to their family. Now, they know they can live in Russia as part of a community and they don’t need Israel."

No faith in or respect for Israeli leaders, most of whom are considered corrupt.

Feelings of anxiety and guilt that Zionism has hijacked Judaism and that traditional Jewish values are being corrupted.

The increasing difficulty of providing coherent answers to one’s children, as they become more educated and aware of their family history, and indeed honesty to oneself, on the question of why families from Europe and elsewhere are living on land and in homes stolen from others who obviously are local and did not come from some other place around the World.

The recent growing appreciation, for many Israelis, significantly abetted by the Internet and the continuing Palestinian resistance, of the compelling and challenging Palestinians' narrative that totally undermines the Zionist clarion of the last century of “A Land without a People for a People without a Land.'

Fear mongering of the political leaders designed to keep citizens supporting the government’s policies ranging from the Iranian bomb, the countless ‘Terrorists” seemingly everywhere and planning another Holocaust, or various existential threats that keep families on edge and concluding that they don’t want to raise their children under such conditions.

Explaining that he was speaking as a private citizen and not as a member of Democrats Abroad Israel, New York native Hillel Schenker suggested that Jews who come to Israel "want to make sure that they have the possibility of an alternative to return whence they came." He added that the "insecurities involved in modern life, and an Israel not yet living at peace with any of its neighbors, have also produced a phenomenon of many Israelis seeking a European passport, based on their family roots, just in case."

Gene Schulman, a Senior American-Jewish fellow at the Switzerland-based Overseas American Academy, put it even more drastically, emphasizing that all Jews are "scared to death of what is probably going to become of Israel even if the U.S. continues its support for it."

Many observers of Israeli society agree that a major, if unexpected recent impetus for Jews to leave Palestine has been the past three months of the Arab Awakening that overturned Israel’s key pillars of regional support.

According to Layal, a Palestinian student from Shatila Camp, who is preparing for the June 5^th “Naksa” march to the Blueline in South Lebanon: “What the Zionist occupiers of Palestine saw from Tahir Square in Cairo to Maroun al Ras in South Lebanon has convinced many Israelis that the Arab and Palestinian resistance, while still in its nascence, will develop into a massive and largely peaceful ground swell, such that no amount of weapons or apartheid administration can insure a Zionist future in Palestine. They are right to seek alternative places to raise their families.”

http://www.opinion-maker.org/2011/06/israelis-rush-for-second-passports/

Quelles sont les analogies entre les Revoltes du 'printemps Arabe' et le plan de division israelien du monde Arabe de Oded Yinon mis en pratique, en petites entités se faisant la guerre sur criteres ethnico-tribaux-religieux

Abu-Suleyman4:10 AMNo comments

LE DOSSIER SUR LE TERRORISME ISRAELIEN 



UNE STRATEGIE POUR ISRAEL DANS LES ANNEES 1980 



Par Oded YINON

(Traduction Israel Shahak)

Nous publions ici l'essentiel d'un texte paru a Jerusalem en fevrier 1982 dans le n° 14 de la revue en
hebreu Kivunim, organe de la World Zionist Organization (Organisation sioniste mondiale). II a ete traduit
en anglais et publie en juin 1982 par Israel Shahak, l'infatigable defenseur israelien des droits de I'homme.
Faute de place, nous n'avons pas reproduit ici les notes en bas de page.

Les premieres pages du texte ne concernent pas directement le Moyen-Orient. L'auteur y constate que
dans le monde d'aujourd'hui la morale ne joue plus guere de role et que ce sont les besoins materiels qui
l'emportent. II affirme aussi que I'URSS utilisera la force nucleaire pour s'imposer. Rappelons une derniere
fois que ce texte a ete publie au debut de 1982.

Depuis 1967, les Soviets ont transforme la maxime de Clausewitz en : "La guerre est la continuation
de la politique par des moyens nucleaires," et ils en ont fait la devise qui guide toute leur politique. Deja, ils
sont aujourd'hui en train de realiser leurs objectifs dans notre region et a travers le monde, et la necessite de
s'y opposer devient l'element majeur dans notre politique de securite interieure et bien entendu celui du reste
du monde libre. C'est la notre defi exterieur majeur.

C'est pourquoi le monde arabo-musulman n'est pas le probleme strategique majeur que nous
affronterons dans les annees quatre-vingts, bien qu'il represente la principale menace contre Israel grace a sa
puissance militaire grandissante. Le monde, avec ses minorites ethniques, ses factions et crises internes, qui
est etonnamment auto-destructeur, comme on peut le voir au Liban, en Iran non-arabe et maintenant aussi en
Syrie, est incapable de surmonter ses problemes fondamentaux et ne constitue pas ainsi une menace reelle a
long terme pour l'Etat d' Israel, mais seulement a court terme ou son pouvoir militaire immediat a une grande
importance. A long terme, ce monde sera incapable d'exister a l'interieur de son cadre actuel dans les zones
qui nous entourent sans devoir subir des transformations revolutionnaires authentiques. Le monde arabo-
musulman est construit comme un chateau de cartes provisoire agence par des etrangers (la France et la Grande
Bretagne dans les annees 1920), sans que les souhaits et les desirs des habitants aient ete pris en compte. Ce
monde a ete divise arbitrairement en 19 Etats, tous produits de combinaisons de minorites et de groupes
ethniques hostiles les uns aux autres de sorte que chaque Etat arabe musulman subit aujourd'hui une
destruction de l'interieur et dans quelques uns d'entre eux une guerre civile fait deja rage. La plupart des
Arabes, 118 sur 170 millions, vivent en Afrique, en majorite en Egypte (45 millions). A part l'Egypte, tous
les Etats du Maghreb forment un melange d' Arabes et de Berberesnon-arabes. En Algerie la guerre civile fait
rage dans les montagnes de Kabylie entre les deux nations du pays. Le Maroc et l'Algerie sont en guerre au
sujet du Sahara espagnol, outre les luttes internes de chacun d'entre eux. L'Islam militant met en danger
l'integrite de la Tunisie et Kaddafi fomente des guerres qui sont destructrices du point de vue arabe, de la part
d'un pays peu peuple et qui ne peut pas devenir une nation puissante. C'est pour cela qu'il avait tente dans le
passe des unifications avec des Etats qui sont plus authentiques, comme l'Egypte et la Syrie. Le Soudan,
l'Etat le plus ecartele dans le monde arabo-musulman d'aujourd'hui est le produit de quatre groupes hostiles
les uns aux autres, une minorite arabo-musulmane sunnite qui gouverne une majorite d'Africains non-arabes,
paiens et Chretiens. En Egypte, il y a une majorite de musulmans sunnites faisant face a une importante
minorite de Chretiens qui est dominante en Haute-Egypte (quelque 7 millions d'entre eux) de sorte que meme
Sadate, dans son discours du 8 Mai, exprima sa peur qu'ils ne reclament un Etat autonome, quelque chose
d'identique a un «second» Liban Chretien en Egypte.

Tous les Etats arabes a l'Est d'lsrael sont dechires et infestes de conflits internes encore plus
nombreux que ceux du Maghreb. La Syrie n'est pas differente fondamentalement du Liban a l'exception du
regime militaire fort qui la gouverne. Mais la guerre civile reelle qui a lieu de nos jours entre la majorite
sunnite et la minorite chiite alaouite regnante (pas plus de 12 % de la population) prouve la gravite du
probleme interieur.

THE ISRAELI TERRORISM FILE

L'Irak n'est pas, encore une fois, essentiellement different de ses voisins, bien que sa majorite soit
chiite et que la minorite sunnite soit regnante. Soixante-cinq pour cent de la population n'a pas droit au
chapitre en politique, ou une elite de 20 % tient le pouvoir. En outre, il y a une importante minorite kurde
dans le Nord, et si ce n'etait la fermete du regime, de l'armee et les revenus petroliers, l'etat futur de l'lrak ne
serait pas si different de celui du Liban dans le passe ou de la Syrie aujourd'hui. Les germes de conflit
interieur de guerre civile sont deja visibles aujourd'hui, surtout apres 1' accession de Khomeiny au pouvoir en
Iran, un leader que les chiites en Irak percoivent comme leur chef naturel.

Toutes les principautes du Golfe et 1' Arabie saoudite reposent sur un chateau de sable qui ne contient
que du petrole. Au Koweit, les Koweitis ne representent que le quart de la population. A Bahrain, les chiites
sont a nouveau la majorite, mais ce sont les sunnites qui sont au pouvoir. II en est de meme a Oman et au
Yemen du Nord. Meme au Yemen du Sud marxiste il y a une minorite chiite assez importante. En Arabie
Saoudite, la moitie de la population est etrangere, egyptienne et yemenite, mais une minorite saoudienne
detient le pouvoir.

La Jordanie est en realite palestinienne, gouvernee par une minorite bedouine trans-jordanienne, mais
le plus gros de l'armee et certainement l'administration sont maintenant palestiniens. En fait, Amman est
aussi palestinienne que Naplouse. Tous ces pays ont des armees relativement puissantes. Mais ici aussi il y a
probleme. L'armee syrienne actuelle est en majeure partie sunnite avec un corps d'officiers alaouite ; l'armee
irakienne est aussi chiite avec des commandants sunnites. Cela a une grande signification pour le long terme,
et c'est pourquoi il ne sera pas possible de maintenir la loyaute de l'armee pour une longue duree en dehors du
seul denominateur commun : l'hostilite envers Israel, et meme cela est aujourd'hui insuffisant.

Les autres Etats musulmans, face aux Arabes, aussi divises qu'ils soient, partagent le meme sort. La
moitie de la population iranienne parle le persan, 1' autre moitie est d'origine turque. La population turque est
composee d'une majorite de musulmans sunnites (50 %), et deux importantes minorites, 12 millions
d'Alaouites chiites et 6 millions de Kurdes sunnites. En Afghanistan, il y a 5 millions de chiites qui
constituent le tiers de la population. Le Pakistan sunnite a quinze millions de chiites qui mettent en danger
l'existence de l'Etat.

Ce tableau des minorites nationales ethniques s'etendant du Maroc a l'lnde et de la Somalie a la
Turquie indique l'absence de stabilite et une degenerescence rapide de la region entiere. Quand ce tableau est
ajoute au tableau economique, nous voyons comment toute la region est edifiee comme un chateau de cartes,
incapable de resister a ses problemes graves.

Dans ce monde geant mais eclate il y a quelques groupes prosperes et une enorme masse de pauvres.
La plupart des Arabes ont un revenu annuel moyen de 300 dollars. C'est la situation en Egypte, dans les pays
du Maghreb, sauf la Libye, et en Irak. Le Liban est dechire et son economie est en train de tomber en ruines.
C'est un Etat dans lequel il n'y a pas de pouvoir central, mais seulement cinq autorites souveraines de facto
(chretienne dans leNord, soutenue par la Syrie et sous l'autorite du clan des Franjie, a l'Est une zone sous
controle syrien direct, au centre une enclave chretienne controlee par les Phalangistes, dans le Sud et jusqu'au
Litani une region a majorite palestinienne controlee par l'OLP , l'Etat Chretien du Commandant Haddad et un
demi million de chiites. La Syrie est dans une situation encore plus difficile et l'aide qu'elle obtiendra avec
son union avec la Libye ne sera pas suffisante pour affronter les problemes fondamentaux materiels et
l'entretien d'une grande armee. L'Egypte est dans une situation encore pire : des millions de gens sont au
bord de la famine, la moitie de la main d'oeuvre est sans emploi, et le logement est rare dans cette zone la
plus peuplee du monde. A l'exception de l'armee, il n'y a pas un seul ministere fonctionnant efficacement et
l'Etat est dans un etat de banqueroute permanente et dependant entierement de l'assistance etrangere americaine
accordee depuis la paix.

II existe dans les Etats du Golfe, 1' Arabie saoudite, la Libye et 1' Egypte, la plus grande concentration
d'argent et de petrole du monde, mais ceux qui en profitent sont de petites elites qui manquent d'un large
soutien de base et de confiance en soi, ce qu'aucune armee ne saurait garantir. L' Arabie saoudite avec tout son
equipement ne pourrait defendre le regime des vrais dangers interieurs et exterieurs, et ce qui s'est passe a la
Mecque en 1980 en est un exemple parmi d' autres. Une situation triste et explosive entoure Israel et lui pose
des defis, des problemes, des risques mais aussi des occasions d'une portee considerable pour la premiere fois
depuis 1967. II y a de grandes chances que les occasions manquees a ce moment puissent se realiser dans les
annees 1980 a un point et dans des dimensions que nous ne pourrions meme pas imaginer aujourd'hui.

La politique de «paix» et le retour des territoires, sous la pression des Etats-Unis met en peril la
realisation des nouvelles possibilites qui s'offrent a nous. Depuis 1967, tous les gouvernements d'Israel ont
lie nos buts nationaux a des besoins politiques etroits d'une part et, de l'autre, a des opinions interieures
destructives qui ont neutralise nos capacites a l'exterieur eta l'interieur. Le fait de n'avoir pu faire un pas en
direction de la population arabe dans les nouveaux territoires, acquis au cours d'une guerre qui nous a ete
imposee, est l'erreur strategique majeure commise par Israel au lendemain de la Guerre des Six Jours. Nous

LE DOSSIER DU TERRORISME ISRAELI EN

nous serions epargnes depuis lors le plus amer et le plus dangereux des conflits si nous avions donne la
Jordanie aux Palestiniens qui vivent en Cisjordanie. En faisant cela, nous aurions neutralise le probleme
palestinien que nous affrontons maintenant, et pour lequel nous avons trouve des solutions qui ne sont
vraiment pas du tout des solutions, tel que des compromis territoriaux, ou l'autonomie, ce qui revient en
realite au meme. Aujourd'hui, nous faisons face tout d'un coup a d'immenses possibilites pour changer la
situation en profondeur, et cela nous le ferons dans cette decennie, autrement nous ne survivrons pas en tant
qu'Etat.

Au cours des annees 1980, l'Etat d'Israel devra realiser des changements d'une portee considerable a
l'interieur, dans son regime politique et economique, parallelement a des changements radicaux dans sa
politique etrangere, afin de faire face aux defis globaux et regionaux de cette nouvelle periode. La perte des
champs petroliferes du Canal de Suez, des enormes reserves de petrole, de gaz et d'autres ressources dans la
peninsule du Sinai qui est geomorphologiquement identique aux riches pays producteurs de petrole de la
region, debouchera sur un manque d'energie dans un proche avenir et detruira notre economie interieure : le
quart de notre PNB aussi bien que le tiers du budget sont utilises pour l'achat de petrole. La recherche des
matieres premieres dans le Neguev et sur la cote ne changera pas dans un prochain avenir cet etat de choses.

Recuperer la peninsule du Sinai, avec ses ressources actuelles et potentielles, est done une priorite
politique a laquelle les accords de paix de Camp David font obstacle. La faute incombe bien stir au
gouvernement israelien actuel et aux gouvernements qui ont prepare le chemin pour le compromis territorial,
depuis 1967. Les Egyptiens n'auront pas besoin de respecter les traites de paix apres le retour du Sinai, et ils
feront tout ce qu'ils peuvent pour reintegrer le monde arabe et se rapprocher de l'URSS afin de se procurer de
l'aide et de l'assistance militaire. L'aide americaine n'est garantie que pour une courte periode du fait que les
conditions de la paix et l'affaiblissement des Etats-Unis d'Amerique a l'interieur comme a l'exterieur
conduiront a une reduction de l'aide. Sans petrole et le revenu qu'on en tire, avec les enormes depenses
actuelles, nous ne serons pas capables de franchir 1982 dans les conditions actuelles et nous devrons agir afin
de revenir au statu quo qui existait au Sinai avant la visite de Sadate et le traite de paix fautif signe avec lui
en mars 1979.

Israel a deux voies majeures a travers lesquelles il atteindra cet objectif, l'une directe et 1' autre
indirecte. L'option directe est la moins realiste a cause de la nature du regime et du gouvernement en Israel
aussi bien de la sagesse de Sadate qui obtint notre retrait du Sinai, ce qui fut, au lendemain de la Guerre de
1973, sa plus importante realisation depuis son accession au pouvoir. Israel ne rompra pas unilateralement le
traite, ni aujourd'hui ni en 1982, a moins d'etre fortement contraint economiquement et politiquement et que
l'Egypte fournisse a Israel l'excuse de reprendre le Sinai pour la quatrieme fois de notre courte histoire. Ce qui
reste done, e'est l'option indirecte. La situation economique en Egypte, la nature du regime et sa politique
pan-arabe, amenera apres avril 1982 une situation dans laquelle Israel sera force d'agir directement ou
indirectement afin de reprendre pour longtemps le controle du Sinai en tant que point strategique economique
et reserve d'energie. L'Egypte ne represente pas un probleme strategique militaire du fait de ses problemes
internes et pourrait etre ramenee a sa situation du lendemain de la Guerre de 1967 en pas plus d'une journee.

Le mythe de l'Egypte en tant que puissant leader du monde arabe fut aneanti des 1956 et sans aucun
doute il ne survecut pas en 1967, mais notre politique qui rendit le Sinai fit du mythe un «fait». Cependant,
en realite, la puissance de l'Egypte par rapport a Israel seul et au reste du monde arabe s'est reduite de 50 %
depuis 1967. L'Egypte n'est plus l'avant-garde politique dans le monde arabe et elle est economiquement au
bord de la crise. Sans aide etrangere, la crise eclaterait le lendemain. A court terme, du fait du retour du Sinai,
l'Egypte gagnera plusieurs avantages a nos depens, mais seulement a court terme jusqu'en 1982, et cela ne
changera pas l'equilibre a son avantage, et amenera probablement sa chute. L'Egypte se donne deja, dans sa
politique interieure, l'image d'un cadavre et d'autant plus si Ton tient compte de la montee du conflit entre
musulmans et Chretiens. Depecer territorialement l'Egypte en regions geographiques distinctes, e'est le dessein
politique d'Israel dans les annees 1980 sur son front occidental.

L'Egypte est divisee et morcelee en plusieurs ilots de pouvoir. Si l'Egypte se desintegre, des pays
comme la Libye, le Soudan ou meme les pays plus lointains ne continuerons pas a exister dans leur forme
actuelle et connaitront a leur tour la chute et la dissolution de l'Egypte. La perspective d'un Etat Chretien
copte en Haute-Egypte, parallelement a un certain nombre d'Etats faibles avec un pouvoirtres localise, et sans
un gouvernement centralise comme de nos jours, cette perspective est la cle pour un developpement
historique, qui prit du retard uniquement a cause du traite de paix, mais qui semble inevitable a long terme.

Le front occidental, qui parait en surface plus problematique, est en fait moins complique que le front
oriental, ou la plupart des evenements saillants sont de fraiche date. La dissolution totale du Liban en cinq
provinces doit servir de precedent pour le monde arabe dans sa totalite, y compris l'Egypte, la Syrie, l'lrak et
la Peninsule arabique. La dissolution de la Syrie et plus tard de l'lrak en zones exclusivement ethniques ou
religieuses comme au Liban, est l'objectif principal d'Israel pour le long terme sur son front oriental, tandis

THE ISRAELI TERRORISM FILE

que la dissolution du pouvoir militaire de ces Etats constitue un objectif principal dans le court terme. La
Syrie se disloquera en fonction de sa structure ethnique et religieuse en plusieurs Etats comme de nos jours au
Liban, de sorte qu'on aura un Etat alaouite le long de la cote, un Etat sunnite dans la region d'Alep, un autre
Etat sunnite a Damas hostile a son voisin du Nord, et les Druzes qui erigeront un Etat, peut-etre meme sur
notre Golan, et certainement dans le Hauran et dans le Nord du Jourdain. Cet etat des choses sera la garantie
de la paix et de la securite pour le long terme dans la region, et cet objectif est deja aujourd'hui a notre portee.
L'Irak, riche en petrole d'un cote, et dechire interieurement de l'autre, est un candidat garanti pour les objectifs
d'Israel. Sa dissolution est meme encore plus importante pour nous que celle de la Syrie. L'Irak est plus fort
que la Syrie. C'est la puissance irakienne qui constitue dans le court terme le plus grand danger pour Israel.
Une guerre Irak-Iran dechirera l'lrak et provoquera sa chute interieure meme avant qu'il ne soit capable
d'organiser une bataille sur un large front contre nous. N'importe quel conflit inter-arabe nous sera profitable
dans le court terme et raccourcira la voie pour l'objectif encore plus important, celui de la dislocation de l'lrak
en groupes comme en Syrie et au Liban. En Irak, une division en provinces selon des criteres ethnico-
religieux comme en Syrie du temps de l'Empire ottoman est possible. Ainsi, trois (ou plus) Etats existeront
autour des trois importantes villes : Bassorah, Baghdad et Mossoul, et les regions chiites du Sud se
separeront des regions sunnites et kurdes au Nord. II est possible que la confrontation irano-irakienne puisse
approfondir cette polarisation.

La Peninsule arabique est une candidate toute naturelle a la dissolution du fait des pressions
interieures et exterieures, et la chose est inevitable surtout en Arabie Saoudite. Nonobstant le fait que sa
puissance economique, fondee sur le petrole, demeure intacte ou qu'elle puisse diminuer a long terme, les
fissures internes et les depressions sont un developpement evident et naturel a la lumiere de la structure
politique presente.

La Jordanie represente un objectif strategique immediat dans le court terme, mais non dans le long
terme, parce qu'elle ne constitue pas une menace reelle dans le long terme apres sa dissolution, la fin du long
regne du Roi Hussein et le transfert du pouvoir aux Palestiniens dans le court terme.

II n'y a aucune chance pour que la Jordanie puisse continuer d'exister dans le long terme dans sa
structure actuelle et la politique d'Israel, en periode de guerre comme en periode de paix, doit etre orientee
vers la liquidation de la Jordanie sous sa forme actuelle et le transfert du pouvoir a la majorite palestinienne.
Changer le regime a l'Est du Jourdain amenera la fin du probleme des territoires densement peuples dArabes a
l'Est du Jourdain. Que ce soit en periode de guerre ou de paix, Immigration a partir des territoires et leur gel
demographique et economique sont les garanties pour un prochain changement sur les deux rives du Jourdain,
et nous devons etre plus actifs dans l'acceleration de ce processus dans l'avenir le plus proche. Le projet
d'autonomie doit etre aussi rejete, aussi bien que n'importe quel compromis ou division des territoires car,
selon les plans de l'OLP et ceux des Arabes israeliens eux-memes, le plan Shefa'amr de septembre 1980, il
n'est plus possible de continuer a vivre dans ce pays dans la situation actuelle sans la separation des deux
nations, les Arabes vers la Jordanie et les juifs vers les regions a l'Ouest du Jourdain. Une coexistence
authentique et la paix regneront dans le pays seulement quand les Arabes auront compris que, sans un pouvoir
juif s'etendant du Jourdain a la mer ils n'auront ni existence ni securite. lis n'auront une nation a eux et la
securite qu'en Jordanie.

A l'interieur d'Israel, la distinction entre les zones de 1967 et les autres territoires, ceux de 1948, a
toujours ete sans signification pour les Arabes et de nos jours elle n'a plus aucune signification pour nous. Le
probleme doit etre envisage dans sa totalite, sans aucune division, comme celle de 67. II doit etre clair, dans
n'importe quelle situation politique future ou n'importe quelle constellation militaire, que la solution du
probleme des Arabes indigenes viendra seulement quand ils reconnaitront l'existence d'Israel dans des
frontieres sures jusqu'a la riviere du Jourdain et au-dela, en tant que notre besoin existentiel dans cette epoque
difficile, 1' epoque du nucleaire dans laquelle nous entrerons bientot. II n'est plus possible de vivre avec trois-
quarts de population juive sur une bande cotiere dense qui est trop dangereuse a l'ere nucleaire.

La dispersion de la population est done l'objectif strategique interieur du plus grand interet;
autrement, nous cesserons d'exister a l'interieur de n'importe quelle frontiere. La Judee, la Samarie et la
Galilee sont l'unique garantie de notre existence nationale et, si nous ne devenons pas la majorite dans les
regions montagneuses, nous ne regnerons pas dans le pays, et nous serons comme les Croises qui ont perdu le
pays qui n'etait de toute maniere pas le leur, et dans lequel ils n'etaient que des etrangers pour commencer.
Reequilibrer le pays demographiquement, strategiquement et economiquement est aujourd'hui l'objectif le
plus grand et le plus central. Mettre la main sur la ligne de partage des eaux de Bersheeba jusqu'a la Haute
Galilee est l'objectif national engendre par la perspective strategique majeure qui est la colonisation de la
partie la plus montagneuse du pays, aujourd'hui vide de juifs.

Realiser nos buts sur le front oriental depend d'abord de la realisation de notre objectif strategique
interieur. La transformation de la structure politique et economique, capable d'aider a la realisation de ces

LE DOSSIER DU TERRORISME ISRAELI EN

objectifs strategiques, est la cle de l'achevement du changement entier. Nous avons besoin de passer d'une
economie centralisee dans laquelle le gouvernement a un role central, a un marche libre et ouvert, aussi bien
que de cesser de dependre du contribuable americain pour developper avec nos propres moyens une
authentique infrastructure economique productive. Si nous ne sommes pas capables de realiser ce changement
librement et volontairement, nous y serons forces par les developpements mondiaux, surtout dans les
domaines de 1' economie, de l'energie et du politique, et par notre propre isolement croissant.

D'un point de vue militaire et strategique, l'Occident dirige par les USA est incapable de resister a
l'ensemble des pressions de l'URSS de par le monde, et Israel doit pour cela se tenir seule dans les annees 80,
sans aucune assistance etrangere, militaire ou economique, et ceci est aujourd'hui dans nos possibilites, sans
compromis. Des changements rapides dans le monde vont produire un changement dans la condition des juifs
dans le monde, pour lesquels Israel deviendra non seulement un dernier recours mais aussi la seule alternative
existentielle. Nous ne pouvons pas assurer que les juifs americains et les communautes d'Europe et
d' Amerique latine continueront d'exister dans l'avenir dans la forme actuelle.

Notre existence dans ce pays meme est sure et il n'y a aucune force qui pourrait nous en deloger ni par
la violence ni par la ruse (methode de Sadate). Malgre les difficultes de la politique erronee de «paix» et le
probleme des Arabes israeliens et celui des territoires, nous pouvons traiter efficacement ces problemes dans
un avenir pre visible.

Le commentaire d'Israel Shahak

II faut clarifier trois elements importants pour pouvoir comprendre les possibilites les plus
significatives pour la realisation de ce plan sioniste pour le Moyen-Orient, et aussi pourquoi il doit etre
publie.

Les conditions militaires de ce plan.

Nous n'avons pas mentionne jusqu'ici les conditions militaires de ce plan, mais lors des multiples
occasions ou Ton vient a «expliquer» dans des reunions privees un plan de ce genre a des membres de
l'establishment israelien, cet aspect militaire est alors clarifie. II est suppose que les forces militaires
israeliennes, dans toutes ses branches, sont insuffisantes pour assumer 1' occupation d' aussi vastes territoires
que ceux qui ont ete mentionnes plus haut. En realite, meme en temps de «troubles» palestiniens intenses, les
forces de l'armee israelienne sont trop dispersees. La parade est la methode de gouverner au moyen des «forces
de Haddad» ou des «Associations de villages* : des forces locales soumises a des «chefs» completement
dissocies de la population, n'ayant meme pas derriere eux de structure feodale ou de parti (comme en ont les
Phalangistes, par exemple). Les «Etats» proposes par Yinon sont des «Territoires de Haddad» ou des
«Associations de villages», et leurs forces armees en seraient a n'en pas douter similaires. En plus, la
superiorite militaire israelienne serait dans de telles conditions beaucoup plus grande qu'elle ne Test meme
maintenant, de sorte que tout mouvement de revoke serait «puni» soit par une humiliation massive comme en
Cisjordanie et dans la Bande de Gaza, ou par bombardement et effacement de villes, comme aujourd'hui (Juin
1982) au Liban, ou par les deux. Afin d'y parvenir, le plan, comme il est explique oralement, appelle a
l'etablissement de garnisons a des endroits strategiques entre les mini-Etats, pourvues de forces destructives
mobiles. En fait, nous avons vu quelque chose de similaire dans le territoire de Haddad et nous verrons
certainement le premier exemple de ce systeme fonctionner soit dans le Sud du Liban ou dans tout le Liban.

II est evident que les suppositions militaires enoncees plus haut, et aussi le plan dans sa totalite,
dependent aussi du fait de savoir si les Arabes vont continuer d'etre plus divises que maintenant, et de
l'absence en leur sein de tout mouvement progressiste de masse. II se peut que ces deux conditions soient
ecartees des que le plan sera bien avance, avec des consequences qui sont imprevisibles.

Pourquoi est-il necessaire de publier ce plan en Israel.

La raison de la publication est la nature double de la societe israelo-judaique : une grande etendue de
liberie et de democratic, surtout pour les juifs, combinee a l'expansionnisme et la discrimination raciale. Dans
une telle situation, l'elite judeo-israelienne (du fait que les masses suivent la tele et les discours de Begin) a
besoin d'etre persuadee. Les premiers pas dans ce processus de persuasion sont d'ordre oral, comme on l'a
indique plus haut, mais il vient le temps ou cela devient insuffisant. Le materiel ecrit doit etre produit au
benefice de «persuadeurs» et «explicateurs» plus stupides (par exemple les officiers de rang moyen qui sont,

THE ISRAELI TERRORISM FILE

d'habitude, remarquablement stupides). lis «l'apprennent» alors plus ou moins et le prechent aux autres. II
faut remarquer qu'Israel, et meme le Yishouv (l'ensemble des juifs en Palestine des annees 1920), a toujours
marche de cette facon. Je me rappelle moi-meme bien (avant d'etre «en opposition*) comment la necessite de
la guerre avec l'Egypte m'aete expliquee, a moi et a d' autres un an avant la guerre de 1956, et comment la
necessite de conquerir «le reste de la Palestine occidentale quand nous en aurons l'occasion» etait expliquee
dans les annees 1965-67.

Pourquoi suppose-t-on qu'il n'y ait pas de risque particulier venant de l'exterieur concernant la
publication de tels plans ?

De tels riques peuvent venir de deux sources, pour autant que 1' opposition principale interieure
demeure tres faible (une situation qui pourrait changer du fait de la guerre contre le Liban) : le monde arabe, y
compris les Palestiniens, et les Etats-Unis. Le monde arabe s'est montre nettement incapable d'une analyse
minutieuse et rationnelle de la societe judeo-israelienne, et les Palestiniens n'ont pas ete dans l'ensemble
meilleurs que le reste. Dans une telle situation, meme ceux qui sont en train de crier contre les dangers de
l'expansionnisme israelien (qui sont assez reels), le font non a partir de connaissance effective et detaillee,
mais par croyance dans le mythe. Un bon exemple en cela, c'est la croyance tres persistante en l'existence d'un
inscription, qui n'existe pas, sur le mur de la Knesset, du verset de la Bible qui decrit Israel comme s'etendant
du Nil a l'Euphrate. Un autre exemple, ce sont les declarations persistantes et completement fausses qui sont
faites par quelques-uns des leaders arabes les plus importants, au sujet des deux raies bleues du drapeau
israelien qui symboliseraient le Nil et l'Euphrate, alors qu'ils sont en fait repris des raies du chale de prieres
juif (Talit). Les specialistes israeliens supposent qu'en fin de compte les Arabes ne feront pas attention a leurs
discussions serieuses sur l'avenir, et la guerre du Liban leur a donne raison. Alors pourquoi ne pourraient-ils
pas continuer avec leurs vieilles methodes de persuasion des autres Israeliens ?

Une situation fort similaire se retrouve aux Etats-Unis, au moins jusqu'a maintenant. La plupart des
commentateurs plus ou moins serieux prennent leurs informations sur Israel, et l'essentiel de l'opinion qu'ils
s'en font, de deux sources. La premiere consiste en articles de la presse americaine «liberale», rediges presque
totalement par des admirateurs juifs d'Israel qui, meme s'ils se montrent critiques de quelques aspects de
l'Etat d'Israel, pratiquent loyalement ce que Staline avait l'habitude d'appeler «la critique constructive)). (En
fait, ceux d'entre euxqui se targuent d'etre «anti-staliniens» sont en realite plus staliniens que Staline, avec
Israel comme leur Dieu qui n'a pas failli). Dans le cadre de ce culte critique, Israel est cense avoir toujours de
«bonnes intentions)) et ne «fait que des erreurs», de sorte qu'un tel plan ne pourrait etre l'objet de discussion -
exactement comme les genocides bibliques commis par des juifs ne sont pas mentionnes. L'autre source
d' information, leJerusalem Post, adopte une politique similaire. Ainsi, tant que la situation existe dans
laquelle Israel est reellement une «societe fermee» au reste du monde, parce que le monde veut fermer ses
yeux, la publication et meme le commencement de la realisation d'un tel plan est realiste et faisable.

17juinl982

Gazette du Golfe et des banlieues (premiere serie), n°4, mai 1991.

Publication originale: Zionist Plan for the Middle East (Special Document, No 1)

Oded Yinon, Israel Shahak, Interlink Pub Group Inc; Paperback - 1 June, 1982 ISBN: 0937694568. Seems
to be out of print.
Traduction d'abordparue dans La Revue d'etudes palestiniennes, N° 5, Paris, automne 1982, p. 73-84.

«««««««««««ooo>»»»»»»»»»

LE DOSSIER DU TERRORISME ISRAELI EN

La version anglaise de notre ami Israel Shahak, qui a traduit de
I'hebreu:

The Zionist Plan for the
Middle East

I fan slated and edited by Israel Shahak

Publisher's Note

The Association of Arab-American University Graduates finds it
compelling to inaugurate its new publication series, Special Documents, with
Oded Yinon's article which appeared in Kivunim (Directions), the journal of the
Department of Information of the World Zionist Organization. Oded Yinon is
an Israeli journalist and was formerly attached to the Foreign Ministry of
Israel. To our knowledge, this document is the most explicit, detailed and
unambiguous statement to date of the Zionist strategy in the Middle East.
Furthermore, it stands as an accurate representation of the "vision" for the
entire Middle East of the presently ruling Zionist regime of Begin, Sharon and
Eitan. Its importance, hence, lies not in its historical value but in the
nightmare which it presents.

The plan operates on two essential premises. To survive, Israel must 1)
become an imperial regional power, and 2) must effect the division of the
whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states.
Small here will depend on the ethnic or sectarian composition of each state.
Consequently, the Zionist hope is that sectarian-based states become Israel's
satellites and, ironically, its source of moral legitimation.

This is not a new idea, nor does it surface for the first time in Zionist
strategic thinking. Indeed, fragmenting all Arab states into smaller units has
been a recurrent theme. This theme has been documented on a very modest
scale in the AAUG publication, Israel's Sacred Terrorism (1980), by Livia
Rokach. [See below ] Based on the memoirs of Moshe Sharett, former Prime
Minister of I srael, Rokach's study documents, in convincing detail, the Zionist
plan as it applies to Lebanon and as it was prepared in the mid-fifties.

The first massive Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1978 bore this plan out
to the minutest detail. The second and more barbaric and encompassing
Israeli invasion of Lebanon on June 6, 1982, aims to effect certain parts of
this plan which hopes to see not only Lebanon, but Syria and Jordan as well,
in fragments. This ought to make mockery of Israeli public claims regarding
their desire for a strong and independent Lebanese central government. More
accurately, they want a Lebanese central government that sanctions their
regional imperialist designs by signing a peace treaty with them. They also
seek acquiescence in their designs by the Syrian, Iraqi, Jordanian and other
Arab governments as well as by the Palestinian people. What they want and
what they are planning for is not an Arab world, but a world of Arab fragments
that is ready to succumb to Israeli hegemony. Hence, Oded Yinon in his
essay, "A Strategy for Israel in the 1980's," talks about "far-reaching

THE ISRAELI TERRORISM FILE

opportunities for the first time since 1967" that are created by the "very
stormy situation [that] surrounds Israel."

The Zionist policy of displacing the Palestinians from Palestine is very
much an active policy, but is pursued more forcefully in times of contlict, such
as in the 1947-1948 war and in the 1967 war. An appendix entitled "Israel
Talks of a New Exodus" is included in this publication to demonstrate past
Zionist dispersals of Palestinians from their homeland and to show, besides
the main Zionist document we present, other Zionist planning for the de-
Palestinization of Palestine.

It is clear from the Kivunim document, published in February, 1982, that
the "far-reaching opportunities" of which Zionist strategists have been thinking
are the same "opportunities" of which they are trying to convince the world
and which they claim were generated by their June, 1982 invasion. It is also
clear that the Palestinians were never the sole target of Zionist plans, but the
priority target since their viable and independent presence as a people
negates the essence of the Zionist state. Every Arab state, however, especially
those with cohesive and clear nationalist directions, is a real target sooner or
later.

Contrasted with the detailed and unambiguous Zionist strategy
elucidated in this document, Arab and Palestinian strategy, unfortunately,
suffers from ambiguity and incoherence. There is no indication that Arab
strategists have internalized the Zionist plan in its full ramifications. Instead,
they react with incredulity and shock whenever a new stage of it unfolds. This
is apparent in Arab reaction, albeit muted, to the Israeli siege of Beirut. The
sad fact is that as long as the Zionist strategy for the Middle East is not taken
seriously Arab reaction to any future siege of other Arab capitals will be the
same.

Khalil Nakhleh
July 23, 1982

Foreword by Israel Shahak

The following essay represents, in m y opinion, the accurate and detailed
plan of the present Zionist regime (of Sharon and Eitan) for the Middle East
which is based on the division of the whole area into small states, and the
dissolution of all the existing Arab states. I will comment on the military
aspect of this plan in a concluding note, Here I want to draw the attention of
the readers to several important points:

1. The idea that all the Arab states should be broken down, by Israel,
into small units, occurs again and again in Israeli strategic thinking, For
example, Ze'ev Schiff, the military correspondent of Ha'aretz (and probably
the most knowledgeable in Israel, on this topic) writes about the "best" that
can happen for Israeli interests in Iraq: "The dissolution of Iraq into a Shi'ite
state, a Sunni state and the separation of the Kurdish part" {Ha'aretz
6/2/1982). Actually, this aspect of the plan is very old.

2. The strong connection with Neo-Conservative thought in the USA is
very prominent, especially in the author's notes. But, while lip service is paid
to the idea of the "defense of the West" from Soviet power, the real aim of
the author, and of the present Israeli establishment is clear: To make an
Imperial Israel into a world power. In other words, the aim of Sharon is to
deceive the Americans after he has deceived all the rest. [Rememberthese
prophetic lines have neen written 20 years ago! ggb ]

LE DOSSIER DU TERRORISME ISRAELI EN

3. It is obvious that much of the relevant data, both in the notes and in
the text, is garbled or omitted, such as the financial help of the U.S. to Israel.
Much of it is pure fantasy. But, the plan is not to be regarded as not
influential, or as not capable of realization for a short time. The plan follows
faithfully the geopolitical ideas current in Germany of 1890-1933, which were
swallowed whole by Hitler and the Nazi movement, and determined their aims
for East Europe. Those aims, especially the division of the existing states,
were carried out in 1939-1941, and only an alliance on the global scale
prevented their consolidation for a period of time.

The notes by the author follow the text. To avoid confusion, I did not
add any notes of my own, but have put the substance of them into this
foreward and the conclusion at the end. I have, however, emphasized some
portions of the text.

I srael Shahak
June 13, 1982

A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties

by Oded Yinon

This essay originally appeared in Hebrew in Kivunim (Directions), A
Journal for Judaism and Zionism; Issue No, 14, Winter, 5742,
February 1982, Editor: Yoram Beck. Editorial Committee: Eli Eyal,
Yoram Beck, Amnon Hadari, Yohanan Manor, Elieser Schweid.
Published by the Department of Publicity/The World Zionist
Organization, Jerusalem.

At the outset of the nineteen eighties the State of Israel is in need of a
new perspective as to its place, its aims and national targets, at home and
abroad. This need has become even more vital due to a number of central
processes which the country, the region and the world are undergoing. We are
living today in the early stages of a new epoch in human history which is not
at all similar to its predecessor, and its characteristics are totally different
from what we have hitherto known. That is why we need an understanding of
the central processes which typify this historical epoch on the one hand, and
on the other hand we need a world outlook and an operational strategy in
accordance with the new conditions. The existence, prosperity and
steadfastness of the Jewish state will depend upon its ability to adopt a new
framework for its domestic and foreign affairs.

This epoch is characterized by several traits which we can already
diagnose, and which symbolize a genuine revolution in our present lifestyle.
The dominant process is the breakdown of the rationalist, humanist outlook
as the major cornerstone supporting the life and achievements of Western
civilization since the Renaissance. The political, social and economic views
which have emanated from this foundation have been based on several
"truths" which are presently disappearing -- for example, the view that man as
an individual is the center of the universe and everything exists in order to
fulfill his basic material needs. This position is being invalidated in the
present when it has become clear that the amount of resources in the cosmos
does not meet Man's requirements, his economic needs or his demographic
constraints. In a world in which there are four billion human beings and
economic and energy resources which do not grow proportionally to meet the
needs of mankind, it is unrealistic to expect to fulfill the main requirement of

THE ISRAELI TERRORISM FILE

Western Society, [1] i.e., the wish and aspiration for boundless consumption.
The view that ethics plays no part in determining the direction Man takes, but
rather his material needs do -- that view is becoming prevalent today as we
see a world in which nearly all values are disappearing. We are losing the
ability to assess the simplest things, especially when they concern the simple
question of what is Good and what is Evil.

The vision of man's limitless aspirations and abilities shrinks in the face
of the sad facts of life, when we witness the break-up of world order around
us. The view which promises liberty and freedom to mankind seems absurd in
light of the sad fact that three fourths of the human race lives under
totalitarian regimes. The views concerning equality and social justice have
been transformed by socialism and especially by Communism into a laughing
stock. There is no argument as to the truth of these two ideas, but it is clear
that they have not been put into practice properly and the majority of
mankind has lost the liberty, the freedom and the opportunity for equality
and justice. In this nuclear world in which we are (still) living in relative peace
for thirty years, the concept of peace and coexistence among nations has no
meaning when a superpower like the USSR holds a military and political
doctrine of the sort it has: that not only is a nuclear war possible and
necessary in order to achieve the ends of Marxism, but that it is possible to
survive after it, not to speak of the fact that one can be victorious in it. [2]

The essential concepts of human society, especially those of the West,
are undergoing a change due to political, military and economic
transformations. Thus, the nuclear and conventional might of the USSR has
transformed the epoch that has just ended into the last respite before the
great saga that will demolish a large part of our world in a multi-dimensional
global war, in comparison with which the past world wars will have been mere
child's play. The power of nuclear as well as of conventional weapons, their
quantity, their precision and quality will turn most of our world upside down
within a few years, and we must align ourselves so as to face that in Israel.
That is, then, the main threat to our existence and that of the Western world.
[3] The war over resources in the world, the Arab monopoly on oil, and the
need of the West to import most of its raw materials from the Third World,
are transforming the world we know, given that one of the major aims of the
USSR is to defeat the West by gaining control over the gigantic resources in
the Persian Gulf and in the southern part of Africa, in which the majority of
world minerals are located. We can imagine the dimensions of the global
confrontation which will face us in the future.

The Gorshkov doctrine calls for Soviet control of the oceans and mineral
rich areas of the Third World. That together with the present Soviet nuclear
doctrine which holds that it is possible to manage, win and survive a nuclear
war, in the course of which the West's military might well be destroyed and its
inhabitants made slaves in the service of Marxism-Leninism, is the main
danger to world peace and to our own existence. Since 1967, the Soviets have
transformed Clausewitz' dictum into "War is the continuation of policy in
nuclear means," and made it the motto which guides all their policies. Already
today they are busy carrying out their aims in our region and throughout the
world, and the need to face them becomes the major element in our country's
security policy and of course that of the rest of the Free World. That is our
major foreign challenge. [4]

The Arab Moslem world, therefore, is not the major strategic problem
which we shall face in the Eighties, despite the fact that it carries the main
threat against Israel, due to its growing military might. This world, with its
ethnic minorities, its factions and internal crises, which is astonishingly self-
destructive, as we can see in Lebanon, in non-Arab Iran and now also in Syria,
is unable to deal successfully with its fundamental problems and does not
therefore constitute a real threat against the State of Israel in the long run,
but only in the short run where its immediate military power has great import.

LE DOSSIER DU TERRORISME ISRAELI EN

In the long run, this world will be unable to exist within its present framework
in the areas around us without having to go through genuine revolutionary
changes. The Moslem Arab World is built like a temporary house of cards put
together by foreigners (France and Britain in the Nineteen Twenties), without
the wishes and desires of the inhabitants having been taken into account. It
was arbitrarily divided into 19 states, all made of combinations of minorites
and ethnic groups which are hostile to one another, so that every Arab
Moslem state nowadays faces ethnic social destruction from within, and in
some a civil war is already raging. [5] Most of the Arabs, 118 million out of
170 million, live in Africa, mostly in Egypt (45 million today).

Apart from Egypt, all the Maghreb states are made up of a mixture of
Arabs and non-Arab Berbers. In Algeria there is already a civil war raging in
the Kabile mountains between the two nations in the country. Morocco and
Algeria are at war with each other over Spanish Sahara, in addition to the
internal struggle in each of them. Militant Islam endangers the integrity of
Tunisia and Qaddafi organizes wars which are destructive from the Arab point
of view, from a country which is sparsely populated and which cannot become
a powerful nation. That is why he has been attempting unifications in the past
with states that are more genuine, like Egypt and Syria. Sudan, the most torn
apart state in the Arab Moslem world today is built upon four groups hostile to
each other, an Arab Moslem Sunni minority which rules over a majority of non-
Arab Africans, Pagans, and Christians. In Egypt there is a Sunni Moslem
majority facing a large minority of Christians which is dominant in upper
Egypt: some 7 million of them, so that even Sadat, in his speech on May 8,
expressed the fear that they will want a state of their own, something like a
"second" Christian Lebanon in Egypt.

All the Arab States east of Israel are torn apart, broken up and riddled
with inner conflict even more than those of the Maghreb. Syria is
fundamentally no different from Lebanon except in the strong military regime
which rules it. But the real civil war taking place nowadays between the Sunni
majority and the Shi'ite Alawi ruling minority (a mere 12% of the population)
testifies to the severity of the domestic trouble.

Iraq is, once again, no different in essence from its neighbors, although
its majority is Shi'ite and the ruling minority Sunni. Sixty-five percent of the
population has no say in politics, in which an elite of 20 percent holds the
power. In addition there is a large Kurdish minority in the north, and if it
weren't for the strength of the ruling regime, the army and the oil revenues,
Iraq's future state would be no different than that of Lebanon in the past or of
Syria today. The seeds of inner conflict and civil war are apparent today
already, especially after the rise of Khomeini to power in Iran, a leader whom
the Shi'ites in Iraq view as their natural leader.

All the Gulf principalities and Saudi Arabia are built upon a delicate
house of sand in which there is only oil. In Kuwait, the Kuwaitis constitute only
a quarter of the population. In Bahrain, the Shi'ites are the majority but are
deprived of power. In the UAE, Shi'ites are once again the majority but the
Sunnis are in power. The same is true of Oman and North Yemen. Even in the
Marxist South Yemen there is a sizable Shi'ite minority. In Saudi Arabia half
the population is foreign, Egyptian and Yemenite, but a Saudi minority holds
power.

Jordan is in reality Palestinian, ruled by a Trans-Jordanian Bedouin
minority, but most of the army and certainly the bureaucracy is now
Palestinian. As a matter of fact Amman is as Palestinian as Nablus. All of
these countries have powerful armies, relatively speaking. But there is a
problem there too. The Syrian army today is mostly Sunni with an Alawi officer
corps, the Iraqi army Shi'ite with Sunni commanders. This has great
significance in the long run, and that is why it will not be possible to retain the
loyalty of the army for a long time except where it comes to the only common
denominator: The hostility towards Israel, and today even that is insufficient.

THE ISRAELI TERRORISM FILE

Alongside the Arabs, split as they are, the other Moslem states share a
similar predicament. Half of Iran's population is comprised of a Persian
speaking group and the other half of an ethnically Turkish group. Turkey's
population comprises a Turkish Sunni Moslem majority, some 50%, and two
large minorities, 12 million Shi'ite Alawis and 6 million Sunni Kurds. In
Afghanistan there are 5 million Shi'ites who constitute one third of the
population. In Sunni Pakistan there are 15 million Shi'ites who endanger the
existence of that state.

This national ethnic minority picture extending from Morocco to India
and from Somalia to Turkey points to the absence of stability and a rapid
degeneration in the entire region. When this picture is added to the economic
one, we see how the entire region is built like a house of cards, unable to
withstand its severe problems.

In this giant and fractured world there are a few wealthy groups and a
huge mass of poor people. Most of the Arabs have an average yearly income
of 300 dollars. That is the situation in Egypt, in most of the Maghreb countries
except for Libya, and in Iraq. Lebanon is torn apart and its economy is falling
to pieces. It is a state in which there is no centralized power, but only 5 de
facto sovereign authorities (Christian in the north, supported by the Syrians
and under the rule of the Franjieh clan, in the East an area of direct Syrian
conquest, in the center a Phalangist controlled Christian enclave, in the south
and up to the Litani river a mostly Palestinian region controlled by the PLO
and Major Haddad's state of Christians and half a million Shi'ites). Syria is in
an even graver situation and even the assistance she will obtain in the future
after the unification with Libya will not be sufficient for dealing with the basic
problems of existence and the maintenance of a large army. Egypt is in the
worst situation: Millions are on the verge of hunger, half the labor force is
unemployed, and housing is scarce in this most densely populated area of
the world. Except for the army, there is not a single department operating
efficiently and the state is in a permanent state of bankruptcy and depends
entirely on American foreign assistance granted since the peace. [6]

In the Gulf states, Saudi Arabia, Libya and Egypt there is the largest
accumulation of money and oil in the world, but those enjoying it are tiny
elites who lack a wide base of support and self-confidence, something that no
army can guarantee. [7] The Saudi army with all its equipment cannot defend
the regime from real dangers at home or abroad, and what took place in
Mecca in 1980 is only an example. A sad and very stormy situation surrounds
Israel and creates challenges for it, problems, risks but also far-reaching
opportunities for the first time since 1967. Chances are that opportunities
missed at that time will become achievable in the Eighties to an extent and
along dimensions which we cannot even imagine today.

The "peace" policy and the return of territories, through a dependence
upon the US, precludes the realization of the new option created for us. Since
1967, all the governments of Israel have tied our national aims down to
narrow political needs, on the one hand, and on the other to destructive
opinions at home which neutralized our capacities both at home and abroad.
Failing to take steps towards the Arab population in the new territories,
acquired in the course of a war forced upon us, is the major strategic error
committed by Israel on the morning after the Six Day War. We could have
saved ourselves all the bitter and dangerous conflict since then if we had
given Jordan to the Palestinians who live west of the Jordan river. By doing
that we would have neutralized the Palestinian problem which we nowadays
face, and to which we have found solutions that are really no solutions at all,
such as territorial compromise or autonomy which amount, in fact, to the
same thing. [8] Today, we suddenly face immense opportunities for
transforming the situation thoroughly and this we must do in the coming
decade, otherwise we shall not survive as a state.

LE DOSSIER DU TERRORISME ISRAELI EN

I n the course of the Nineteen Eighties, the State of I srael will have to go
through far-reaching changes in its political and economic regime
domestically, along with radical changes in its foreign policy, in order to stand
up to the global and regional challenges of this new epoch. The loss of the
Suez Canal oil fields, of the immense potential of the oil, gas and other
natural resources in the Sinai peninsula which is geomorphologically identical
to the rich oil-producing countries in the region, will result in an energy drain
in the near future and will destroy our domestic economy: one quarter of our
present GNP as well as one third of the budget is used for the purchase of oil.
[9] The search for raw materials in the Negev and on the coast will not, in the
near future, serve to alter that state of affairs.

(Regaining) the Sinai peninsula with its present and potential resources
is therefore a political priority which is obstructed by the Camp David and the
peace agreements. The fault for that lies of course with the present Israeli
government and the governments which paved the road to the policy of
territorial compromise, the Alignment governments since 1967. The Egyptians
will not need to keep the peace treaty after the return of the Sinai, and they
will do all they can to return to the fold of the Arab world and to the USSR in
order to gain support and military assistance. American aid is guaranteed only
for a short while, for the terms of the peace and the weakening of the U.S.
both at home and abroad will bring about a reduction in aid. Without oil and
the income from it, with the present enormous expenditure, we will not be
able to get through 1982 under the present conditions and we will have to act
in order to return the situation to the status quo which existed in Sinai prior to
Sadat's visit and the mistaken peace agreement signed with him in March
1979. [10]

Israel has two major routes through which to realize this purpose, one
direct and the other indirect. The direct option is the less realistic one because
of the nature of the regime and government in Israel as well as the wisdom of
Sadat who obtained our withdrawal from Sinai, which was, next to the war of
1973, his major achievement since he took power. Israel will not unilaterally
break the treaty, neither today, nor in 1982, unless it is very hard pressed
economically and politically and Egypt provides Israel with the excuse to take
the Sinai back into our hands for the fourth time in our short history. What is
left therefore, is the indirect option. The economic situation in Egypt, the
nature of the regime and its pan-Arab policy, will bring about a situation after
April 1982 in which Israel will be forced to act directly or indirectly in order to
regain control over Sinai as a strategic, economic and energy reserve for the
long run. Egypt does not constitute a military strategic problem due to its
internal conflicts and it could be driven back to the post 1967 war situation in
no more than one day. [11]

The myth of Egypt as the strong leader of the Arab World was
demolished back in 1956 and definitely did not survive 1967, but our policy,
as in the return of the Sinai, served to turn the myth into "fact." In reality,
however, Egypt's power in proportion both to Israel alone and to the rest of
the Arab World has gone down about 50 percent since 1967. Egypt is no
longer the leading political power in the Arab World and is economically on the
verge of a crisis. Without foreign assistance the crisis will come tomorrow. [12]
In the short run, due to the return of the Sinai, Egypt will gain several
advantages at our expense, but only in the short run until 1982, and that will
not change the balance of power to its benefit, and will possibly bring about
its downfall. Egypt, in its present domestic political picture, is already a corpse,
all the more so if we take into account the growing Moslem-Christian rift.
Breaking Egypt down territorially into distinct geographical regions is the
political aim of Israel in the Nineteen Eighties on its Western front.

Egypt is divided and torn apart into many foci of authority. If Egypt falls
apart, countries like Libya, Sudan or even the more distant states will not
continue to exist in their present form and will join the downfall and

THE ISRAELI TERRORISM FILE

dissolution of Egypt. The vision of a Christian Coptic State in Upper Egypt
alongside a number of weak states with very localized power and without a
centralized government as to date, is the key to a historical development
which was only set back by the peace agreement but which seems inevitable
in the long run. [ 13]

The Western front, which on the surface appears more problematic, is in
fact less complicated than the Eastern front, in which most of the events that
make the headlines have been taking place recently. Lebanon's total
dissolution into five provinces serves as a precendent for the entire Arab world
including Egypt, Syria, Iraq and the Arabian peninsula and is already following
that track. The dissolution of Syria and Iraq later on into ethnically or
religiously unqiue areas such as in Lebanon, is Israel's primary target on the
Eastern front in the long run, while the dissolution of the military power of
those states serves as the primary short term target. Syria will fall apart, in
accordance with its ethnic and religious structure, into several states such as in
present day Lebanon, so that there will be a Shi'ite Alawi state along its coast,
a Sunni state in the Aleppo area, another Sunni state in Damascus hostile to
its northern neighbor, and the Druzes who will set up a state, maybe even in
our Golan, and certainly in the Hauran and in northern Jordan. This state of
affairs will be the guarantee for peace and security in the area in the long run,
and that aim is already within our reach today. [14]

Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is
guaranteed as a candidate for Israel's targets. Its dissolution is even more
important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short
run it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel. An Iraqi-
Iranian war will tear Iraq apart and cause its downfall at home even before it
is able to organize a struggle on a wide front against us. Every kind of inter-
Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the
more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in
Lebanon. In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/ religious lines as in
Syria during Ottoman times is possible. So, three (or more) states will exist
around the three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and Shi'ite areas in
the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north. It is possible that
the present Iranian-Iraqi confrontation will deepen this polarization. [15]

The entire Arabian peninsula is a natural candidate for dissolution due
to internal and external pressures, and the matter is inevitable especially in
Saudi Arabia. Regardless of whether its economic might based on oil remains
intact or whether it is diminished in the long run, the internal rifts and
breakdowns are a clear and natural development in light of the present
political structure. [16]

Jordan constitutes an immediate strategic target in the short run but not
in the long run, for it does not constitute a real threat in the long run after its
dissolution, the termination of the lengthy rule of King Hussein and the
transfer of power to the Palestinians in the short run.

There is no chance that Jordan will continue to exist in its present
structure for a long time, and Israel's policy, both in war and in peace, ought
to be directed at the liquidation of Jordan under the present regime and the
transfer of power to the Palestinian majority. Changing the regime east of the
river will also cause the termination of the problem of the territories densely
populated with Arabs west of the J ordan. Whether in war or under conditions of
peace, emigrationfrom the territories and economic demographic freeze in
them, are the guarantees for the coming change on both banks of the river,
and we ought to be active in order to accelerate this process in the nearest
future. The autonomy plan ought also to be rejected, as well as any
compromise or division of the territories for, given the plans of the PLO and
those of the Israeli Arabs themselves, the Shefa'amr plan of September
1980, it is not possible to go on living in this country in the present situation
without separating the two nations, the Arabs to Jordan and the Jews to the

LE DOSSIER DU TERRORISME ISRAELI EN

areas west of the river. Genuine coexistence and peace will reign over the land
only when the Arabs understand that without Jewish rule between the Jordan
and the sea they will have neither existence nor security. A nation of their own
and security will be theirs only in Jo rd an. [17]

Within Israel the distinction between the areas of '67 and the territories
beyond them, those of '48, has always been meaningless for Arabs and
nowadays no longer has any significance for us. The problem should be seen
in its entirety without any divisions as of '67. It should be clear, under any
future political situation or mifitary constellation, that the solution of the
problem of the indigenous Arabs will come only when they recognize the
existence of Israel in secure borders up to the Jordan river and beyond it, as
our existential need in this difficult epoch, the nuclear epoch which we shall
soon enter. It is no longer possible to live with three fourths of the Jewish
population on the dense shoreline which is so dangerous in a nuclear epoch.

Dispersal of the population is therefore a domestic strategic aim of the
highest order; otherwise, we shall cease to exist within any borders. Judea,
Samaria and the Galilee are our sole guarantee for national existence, and if
we do not become the majority in the mountain areas, we shall not rule in the
country and we shall be like the Crusaders, who lost this country which was not
theirs anyhow, and in which they were foreigners to begin with. Rebalancing
the country demographically, strategically and economically is the highest and
most central aim today. Taking hold of the mountain watershed from
Beersheba to the Upper Galilee is the national aim generated by the major
strategic consideration which is settling the mountainous part of the country
that is empty of J ews today. [18]

Realizing our aims on the Eastern front depends first on the realization
of this internal strategic objective. The transformation of the political and
economic structure, so as to enable the realization of these strategic aims, is
the key to achieving the entire change. We need to change from a centralized
economy in which the government is extensively involved, to an open and
free market as well as to switch from depending upon the U.S. taxpayer to
developing, with our own hands, of a genuine productive economic
infrastructure. If we are not able to make this change freely and voluntarily,
we shall be forced into it by world developments, especially in the areas of
economics, energy, and politics, and by our own growing isolation. [19]

From a military and strategic point of view, the West led by the U.S. is
unable to withstand the global pressures of the USSR throughout the world,
and Israel must therefore stand alone in the Eighties, without any foreign
assistance, military or economic, and this is within our capacities today, with
no compromises. [20] Rapid changes in the world will also bring about a
change in the condition of world Jewry to which Israel will become not only a
last resort but the only existential option. We cannot assume that U.S. Jews,
and the communities of Europe and Latin America will continue to exist in the
present form in the future. [21]

Our existence in this country itself is certain, and there is no force that
could remove us from here either forcefully or by treachery (Sadat's method).
Despite the difficulties of the mistaken "peace" policy and the problem of the
Israeli Arabs and those of the territories, we can effectively deal with these
problems in the foreseeable future.

THE ISRAELI TERRORISM FILE

Conclusions - by Israel Shahak

Three important points have to be clarified in order to be able to
understand the significant possibilities of realization of this Zionist plan for
the Middle East, and also why it had to be published.

The Military Background of The Plan

The military conditions of this plan have not been mentioned above, but
on the many occasions where something very like it is being "explained" in
closed meetings to members of the Israeli Establishment, this point is
clarified. It is assumed that the Israeli military forces, in all their branches,
are insufficient for the actual work of occupation of such wide territories as
discussed above. In fact, even in times of intense Palestinian "unrest" on the
West Bank, the forces of the Israeli Army are stretched out too much. The
answer to that is the method of ruling by means of "Haddad forces" or of
"Village Associations" (also known as "Village Leagues"): local forces under
"leaders" completely dissociated from the population, not having even any
feudal or party structure (such as the Phalangists have, for example). The
"states" proposed by Yinon are "Haddadland" and "Village Associations," and
their armed forces will be, no doubt, quite similar. In addition, Israeli military
superiority in such a situation will be much greater than it is even now, so that
any movement of revolt will be "punished" either by mass humiliation as in
the West Bank and Gaza Strip, or by bombardment and obliteration of cities,
as in Lebanon now (June 1982), or by both. In order to ensure this, the plan,
as explained orally, calls for the establishment of Israeli garrisons in focal
places between the mini states, equipped with the necessary mobile
destructive forces. In fact, we have seen something like this in Haddadland
and we will almost certainly soon see the first example of this system
functioning either in South Lebanon or in all Lebanon.

It is obvious that the above military assumptions, and the whole plan
too, depend also on the Arabs continuing to be even more divided than they
are now, and on the lack of any truly progressive mass movement among
them. It may be that those two conditions will be removed only when the plan
will be well advanced, with consequences which can not be foreseen.

Why it is necessary to publish this in I srael?

The reason for publication is the dual nature of the Israeli-Jewish
society: A very great measure of freedom and democracy, specially for Jews,
combined with expansionism and racist discrimination. In such a situation the
Israeli-Jewish elite (for the masses follow the TV and Begin's speeches) has
to be persuaded. The first steps in the process of persuasion are oral, as
indicated above, but a time comes in which it becomes inconvenient. Written
material must be produced for the benefit of the more stupid "persuaders"
and "explainers" (for example medium-rank officers, who are, usually,
remarkably stupid). They then "learn it," more or less, and preach to others.
It should be remarked that Israel, and even the Yishuv from the Twenties,
has always functioned in this way. I myself well remember how (before I was
"in opposition") the necessity of war with was explained to me and others a
year before the 1956 war, and the necessity of conquering "the rest of
Western Palestine when we will have the opportunity" was explained in the
years 1965-67.

Why is it assumed that there is no special risk from the outside in the
publication of such plans?

Such risks can come from two sources, so long as the principled
opposition inside Israel is very weak (a situation which may change as a

LE DOSSIER DU TERRORISME ISRAELI EN

consequence of the war on Lebanon) The Arab World, including the

Palestinians, and the United States. The Arab World has shown itself so far
quite incapable of a detailed and rational analysis of Israeli-Jewish society,
and the Palestinians have been, on the average, no better than the rest. In
such a situation, even those who are shouting about the dangers of Israeli
expansionism (which are real enough) are doing this not because of factual
and detailed knowledge, but because of belief in myth. A good example is
the very persistent belief in the non-existent writing on the wall of the Knesset
of the Biblical verse about the Nile and the Euphrates. Another example is the
persistent, and completely false declarations, which were made by some of
the most important Arab leaders, that the two blue stripes of the Israeli flag
symbolize the Nile and the Euphrates, while in fact they are taken from the
stripes of the Jewish praying shawl (Talit). The Israeli specialists assume that,
on the whole, the Arabs will pay no attention to their serious discussions of
the future, and the Lebanon war has proved them right. So why should they
not continue with their old methods of persuading other Israelis?

In the United States a very similar situation exists, at least until now.
The more or less serious commentators take their information about Israel,
and much of their opinions about it, from two sources. The first is from articles
in the "liberal" American press, written almost totally by Jewish admirers of
Israel who, even if they are critical of some aspects of the Israeli state,
practice loyally what Stalin used to call "the constructive criticism." (In fact
those among them who claim also to be "Anti-Stalinist" are in reality more
Stalinist than Stalin, with Israel being their god which has not yet failed). In
the framework of such critical worship it must be assumed that Israel has
always "good intentions" and only "makes mistakes," and therefore such a
plan would not be a matter for discussion--exactly as the Biblical genocides
committed by Jews are not mentioned. The other source of information, The
Jerusalem Post, has similar policies. So long, therefore, as the situation
exists in which Israel is really a "closed society" to the rest of the world,
because the world wants to close its eyes, the publication and even the
beginning of the realization of such a plan is realistic and feasible.

I srael Shahak
June 17, 1982
J erusalem

About the Translator

Israel Shahak (1933-2001) was a professor of organic chemistly at
Hebrew University in Jerusalem and the chairman of the Israeli League for
Human and Civil Rights. He published The Shahak Papers, collections of key
articles from the Hebrew press, and was the author of numerous articles and
books, among them Non-Jew in the Jewish State, Israel's Global Role: Weapons
for Repression, published by the AAUG in 1982.

Notes (Yinon article)

1. American Universities Field Staff. Report No. 33, 1979. According to this research, the population
of the world will be 6 billion in the year 2000. Today's world population can be broken down as follows:
China, 958 million; India, 635 million; USSR, 261 million; U.S., 218 million Indonesia, 140 million; Brazil
and J apan, 110 million each. According to the figures of the U.N. Population Fund for 1980, there will be, in
2000, 50 cities with a population of over 5 million each. The population of the Third World will then be 80%
of the world population. According to J ustin Blackwelder, U.S. Census Office chief, the world population will
not reach 6 billion because of hunger.

THE ISRAELI TERRORISM FILE

2. Soviet nuclear policy has been well summarized by two American Sovietologists: Joseph D.
Douglas and Amoretta M. Hoeber, Soviet Strategy for Nuclear War, (Stanford, Ca., Hoover Inst. Press,
1979). In the Soviet Union tens and hundreds of articles and books are published each year which detail
the Soviet doctrine for nuclear war and there is a great deal of documentation translated into English and
published by the U.S. Air Force, including USAF: Marxism- Leninism on War and the Army: The Soviet View,
Moscow, 1972: USAF: The Armed Forces of the Soviet State. Moscow, 1975, by Marshal A. Grechko. The
basic Soviet approach to the matter is presented in the book by Marshal Sokolovski published in 1962 in
Moscow: Marshal V. D. Sokolovski, Military Strategy, Soviet Doctrine and Concepts (New York, Praeger,
1963).

3. A picture of Soviet intentions in various areas of the world can be drawn from the book by
Douglas and Hoeber, ibid. For additional material see: Michael Morgan, "USSR's Minerals as Strategic
Weapon in the Future," Defense and Foreign Affairs, Washington, D.C., Dec. 1979.

4. Admiral of the Fleet Sergei Gorshkov, Sea Power and the State, London, 1979. Morgan, loc. cit.
General George S. Brown (USAF) C-JCS, Statement to the Congress on the Defense Posture of the United
States For Fiscal Year 1979, p. 103; National Security Council, Review of Non-Fuel Mineral Policy,
(Washington, D.C. 1979,); Drew Middleton, The New York Times, (9/15/79); Time, 9/21/80.

5. Elie Kedourie, "The End of the Ottoman Empire," Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 3, No. 4,
1968.

6. Al-Thawra, Syria 12/20/79, Al-Ahram, 12/30/79, Al Ba'ath, Syria, 5/6/79. 55% of the Arabs are
20 years old and younger, 70% of the Arabs live in Africa, 55% of the Arabs under 15 are unemployed,
33% live in urban areas, Oded Yinon, "Egypt's Population Problem," The Jerusalem Quarterly, No. 15,
Spring 1980.

7. E. Kanovsky, "Arab Haves and Have Nots," Thejerusalem Quarterly, No.l, Fall 1976, Al Ba'ath,
Syria, 5/6/79.

8. In his book, former Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin said that the Israeli government is in fact
responsible for the design of American policy in the Middle East, after June '67, because of its own
indecisiveness as to the future of the territories and the inconsistency in its positions since it established the
background for Resolution 242 and certainly twelve years later for the Camp David agreements and the
peace treaty with Egypt. According to Rabin, on June 19, 1967, President Johnson sent a letter to Prime
Minister Eshkol in which he did not mention anything about withdrawal from the new territories but exactly
on the same day the government resolved to return territories in exchange for peace. After the Arab
resolutions in Khartoum (9/1/67) the government altered its position but contrary to its decision of J une 19,
did not notify the U.S. of the alteration and the U.S. continued to support 242 in the Security Council on the
basis of its earlier understanding that Israel is prepared to return territories. At that point it was already too
late to change the U.S. position and Israel's policy. From here the way was opened to peace agreements
on the basis of 242 as was later agreed upon in Camp David. See Yitzhak Rabin. Pinkas Sherut, (Ma'ariv
1979) pp. 226-227.

9. Foreign and Defense Committee Chairman Prof. Moshe Arens argued in an interview
(Ma'ariv, 10/3/80) that the Israeli government failed to prepare an economic plan before the Camp David
agreements and was itself surprised by the cost of the agreements, although already during the
negotiations it was possible to calculate the heavy price and the serious error involved in not having
prepared the economic grounds for peace.

The former Minister of Treasury, Mr. Yigal Holwitz, stated that if it were not for the withdrawal from
the oil fields, Israel would have a positive balance of payments (9/17/80). That same person said two
years earlier that the government of Israel (from which he withdrew) had placed a noose around his neck.
He was referring to the Camp David agreements (Ha'aretz, 11/3/78). In the course of the whole peace
negotiations neither an expert nor an economics advisor was consulted, and the Prime Minister himself,
who lacks knowledge and expertise in economics, in a mistaken initiative, asked the U.S. to give us a loan
rather than a grant, due to his wish to maintain our respect and the respect of the U.S. towards us. See
Ha'aretzl/5/79. Jerusalem Post, 9/7/79. Prof Asaf Razin, formerly a senior consultant in the Treasury,
strongly criticized the conduct of the negotiations; Ha'aretz, 5/5/79. Ma'ariv, 9/7/79. As to matters
concerning the oil fields and Israel's energy crisis, see the interview with Mr. Eitan Eisenberg, a government
advisor on these matters, Ma'ariv Weekly, 12/12/78. The Energy Minister, who personally signed the Camp
David agreements and the evacuation of Sdeh Alma, has since emphasized the seriousness of our condition
from the point of view of oil supplies more than once... see Yediot Ahronot, 7/20/79. Energy Minister Modai
even admitted that the government did not consult him at all on the subject of oil during the Camp David
and Blair House negotiations. Ha'aretz, 8/22/79.

10. Many sources report on the growth of the armaments budget in Egypt and on intentions to give
the army preference in a peace epoch budget over domestic needs for which a peace was allegedly
obtained. See former Prime Minister Mamduh Salam in an interview 12/18/77, Treasury Minister Abd El
Sayeh in an interview 7/25/78, and the paper Al Akhbar, 12/2/78 which clearly stressed that the military
budget will receive first priority, despite the peace. This is what former Prime Minister Mustafa Khalil has
stated in his cabinet's programmatic document which was presented to Parliament, 11/25/78. See English
translation, ICA, FBIS, Nov. 27. 1978, pp. D 1-10. According to these sources, Egypt's military budget
increased by 10% between fiscal 1977 and 1978, and the process still goes on. A Saudi source divulged
that the Egyptians plan to increase their military budget by 100% in the next two years; Ha'aretz, 2/12/79
and Jerusalem Post, 1/14/79.

11. Most of the economic estimates threw doubt on Egypt's ability to reconstruct its economy by
1982. See Economic Intelligence Unit, 1978 Supplement, "The Arab Republic of Egypt"; E. Kanovsky,
"Recent Economic Developments in the Middle East," Occasional Papers, The Shiloah Institution, June 1977;

LE DOSSIER DU TERRORISME ISRAELI EN

Kanovsky, "The Egyptian Economy Since the Mid-Sixties, The Micro Sectors," Occasional Papers, June
1978; Robert McNamara, President of World Bank, as reported in Times, London, 1/24/78.

12. See the comparison made by the researeh of the Institute for Strategic Studies in London, and
research carried out in the Center for Strategic Studies of Tel Aviv University, as well as the research by the
British scientist, Denis Champlin, Military Review, Nov. 1979, ISS: The Military Balance 1979-1980, CSS;
Security Arrangements in Sinai., .by Brig. Gen. (Res.) A Shalev, No. 3.0 CSS; The Military Balance and the
Military Options after the Peace Treaty with Egypt, by Brig. Gen. (Res.) Y. Raviv, No. 4, Dec. 1978, as well
as many press reports including El Hawadeth, London, 3/7/80; El Watan El Arabi, Paris, 12/14/79.

13. As for religious ferment in Egypt and the relations between Copts and Moslems see the series of
articles published in the Kuwaiti paper, El Qabas, 9/15/80. The English author Irene Beeson reports on the
rift between Moslems and Copts, see: Irene Beeson, Guardian, London, 6/24/80, and Desmond Stewart,
Middle East I nternmational, London 6/6/80. For other reports see Pamela Ann Smith, Guardian, London,
12/24/79; The Christian Science Monitor 12/27/79 as well as Al Dustour, London, 10/15/79; El Kefah El
Arabi, 10/15/79.

14. Arab Press Service, Beirut, 8/6-13/80. The New Republic, 8/16/80, Der Spiegel as cited by
Ha'aretz, 3/21/80, and 4/30-5/5/80; The Economist, 3/22/80; Robert Fisk, Times, London, 3/26/80;
Ellsworth Jones, Sunday Times, 3/30/80.

15. J. -P. Peroncel-Hugoz, Le Monde, Paris 4/28/80; Dr. Abbas Kelidar, Middle East Review,
Summer 1979; Conflict Studies, ISS, July 1975; Andreas Kolschitter, Der Zeit, (Ha'aretz, 9/21/79)
Economist Foreign Report, 10/10/79, Afro-Asian Affairs, London, J uly 1979.

16. Arnold Hottinger, "The Rich Arab States in Trouble," The New York Review of Books, 5/15/80;
Arab Press Service, Beirut, 6/25-7/2/80; U.S. News and World Report, 11/5/79 as well as El Ahram,
11/9/79; El Nahar El Arabi Wal Duwali, Paris 9/7/79; El Hawadeth, 11/9/79; David Hakham, Monthly
Review, I DF, J an. -Feb. 79.

17. As for Jordan's policies and problems see El Nahar El Arabi Wal Duwali, 4/30/79, 7/2/79; Prof.
Elie Kedouri, Ma'ariv 6/8/79; Prof. Tanter, Davar 7/12/79; A. Safdi, Jerusalem Post, 5/31/79; El Watan El
Arabi 11/28/79; El Qabas, 11/19/79. As for PLO positions see: The resolutions of the Fatah Fourth
Congress, Damascus, August 1980. The Shefa'amr program of the Israeli Arabs was published in Ha'aretz,
9/24/80, and by Arab Press Report 6/18/80. For facts and figures on immigration of Arabs to Jordan, see
Amos Ben Vered, Ha'aretz, 2/16/77; Yossef Zuriel, Ma'ariv 1/12/80. As to the PLO's position towards Israel
see Shlomo Gazit, Monthly Review; July 1980; Hani El Hasan in an interview, Al Rai AI'Am, Kuwait
4/15/80; Avi Plaskov, "The Palestinian Problem," Survival, ISS, London J an. Feb. 78; David Gutrnann, "The
Palestinian Myth," Commentary, Oct. 75; Bernard Lewis, "The Palestinians and the PLO," Commentary Jan.
75; Monday Morning, Beirut, 8/18-21/80; Journal of Palestine Studies, Winter 1980.

18. Prof. Yuval Neeman, "Samaria -- The Basis for Israel's Security," Ma'arakhot 272-273,
May/June 1980; Ya'akov Hasdai, "Peace, the Way and the Right to Know," Dvar Hashavua, 2/23/80.
Aharon Yariv, "Strategic Depth -- An Israeli Perspective," Ma'arakhot 270-271, October 1979; Yitzhak
Rabin, "Israel's Defense Problems in the Eighties," Ma'arakhot October 1979.

19. Ezra Zohar, In the Regime's Pliers (Shikmona, 1974); Motti Heinrich, Do We have a Chance
Israel, Truth Versus Legend (Reshafim, 1981).

20. Henry Kissinger, "The Lessons of the Past," The Washington Review Vol 1, Jan. 1978; Arthur
Ross, "OPEC's Challenge to the West," The Washington Quarterly, Winter, 1980; Walter Levy, "Oil and the
Decline of the West," Foreign Affairs, Summer 1980; Special Report--"Our Armed Forees-Ready or Not?"
U.S. News and World Report 10/10/77; Stanley Hoffman, "Reflections on the Present Danger," The New
York Review of Books 3/6/80; Time 4/3/80; Leopold Lavedez "The illusions of SALT" Commentary Sept.
79; Norman Podhoretz, "The Present Danger," Commentary March 1980; Robert Tucker, "Oil and American
Power Six Years Later," Commentary Sept. 1979; Norman Podhoretz, "The Abandonment of Israel,"
Commentary J uly 1976; Elie Kedourie, "Misreading the Middle East," Commentary J uly 1979.

21. According to figures published by Ya'akov Karoz, Yediot Ahronot, 10/17/80, the sum total of
anti-Semitic incidents recorded in the world in 1979 was double the amount recorded in 1978. In Germany,
France, and Britain the number of anti-Semitic incidents was many times greater in that year. In the U.S.
as well there has been a sharp increase in anti-Semitic incidents which were reported in that article. For the
new anti-Semitism, see L. Talmon, "The New Anti-Semitism," The New Republic, 9/18/1976; Barbara
Tuchman, "They poisoned the Wells," Newsweek 2/3/75.

Le texte d'Oded Yinon est souvent cite, mais rarement reproduit en entier. II
a disparu de plusieurs sites ou il etat cense se trouver. Voir, en dernier lieu,

Published by the Association of Arab-American University Graduates, Inc.,
Belmont, Massachusetts, 1982, Special Document No. 1, (ISBN 0-937694-56-
8)


Israel, UK and India had developped powerful bioweapons vehicled by mosquitoes, bees, birds



Abu-Suleyman8:18 AMNo comments



The E.coli outbreak in Europe is BioWar



Europe Blog




Waterboarding The World, Part 1:

Out of nowhere a strange new deadly disease has sprung up in Europe, causing an explosion of over 3,500 serious illnesses and 35 or more deaths in at least 10 European nations (and now 4 suspected cases in the U.S. - Ed.).  There are four scientific indications that this is a case of man-engineered Advanced Biowar, as well as strong circumstantial indications that this is a part of something much larger politically.

Scientifically, the four strong indications of an Advanced Biowar (genetically engineered recombination DNA) basis for this new outbreak are as follows: 

(1) Multipoint release.  That is the disease has quickly come from nowhere and is in multiple locations almost overnight.  It is now in at least ten European nations.  In writing this article, I have had to change the numbers twice (total illnesses and deaths and nations involved) as the numbers are increasing almost hourly.

(2) Multi-drug resistance.   Chinese scientists, at the Shenzhen, China laboratory BGI (working with scientists at the University Medical Center of Hamberg-Eppendorf)  have confirmed that the new bacterium carries genes that make it resistant to several classes of antibiotics!  Patients often have bloody diarrhea, and many require intensive care including kidney dialysis.

(3) No cross contaminations.  There is no contamination with fecal matter (or possible related infections) as one might expect from a E.coli infection.  In fact, Germany, which has a large number of cases, has one of the best food safety and inspection programs on Earth.  Normally E.coli infections are spread by feces contaminating food and can also be spread from person to person via the faecal-oral route due to poor hygiene.  So far these do not appear to be primary vectors for the disease and in fact the primary vector is unknown at present.

(4)  Recombination of multiple strains/DNA found.  World Health Organization scientists have confirmed that genetic sequencing tests suggest the strain, E. coli O104:H4, is a never seen before combination/hybrid of two different E. coli bacteria.  Scientists at China's Beijing Genomics Institute say that the new strain is both highly infectious and toxic and that it is similar, but not the same as, a strain (EAEC 55989) isolated in the Central African Republic known to cause serious diarrhea.  The new O104:H4 E.coli strain contains the Shiga-like biotoxin from Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli which binds to and damages kidney cells and can cause potentially fatal HUS (haemolytic uraemic syndrome) disease, which causes serious liver damage.

This is the largest E.coli outbreak and the most deadly in known human history.  This new   enterohemorrhagic strain of the bacterium Escherichia coli (EHEC) can attack the blood, kidneys, liver and brain.  Close to one-third of the cases have developed full-blown HUS (haemolytic uraemic syndrome) disease which is very unusual.  Normally in E.coli outbreaks only10% of the cases develop HUS.  Also unusual is that most victims are adult women, where normally HUS affects more children then adults. The severe bloody diarrhea, with often related kidney, liver, brain and blood damage is somewhat similar to a HEMORRHAGIC fever such as Ebola.  

The circumstantial indications that this is part of something much larger politically is that it fits into a pattern of political/economic/currency/medical/military/disaster/food shortages events and circumstances that are spreading an ever increasing level of chaos throughout the world.  I will be covering these interrelated topics in later posts. 

Stirling   
[Tim Alexander, Rt. Hon. The Earl of Stirling]

Links to relevant articles:

Deadly E.coli outbreak in Europe caused by rare strain of bacterium, UN confirms ~ link

E.coli Outbreak Linked to Aggressive New Strain ~ link

EHEC: Update from Spiegel ~ link  

Killer germ very antibiotic resistant: German researchers ~ link

Europe E.coli is toxic new strain, trade row grows ~ link

Killer E.coli strain described as deadliest yet ~ link  

E.coli in Europe outbreak never seen before - with video ~ link

WHO: E.coli outbreak cause by new strain ~ link

Never seen before E.coli strain hits Europe - video ~ link

Outbreak in Europe blamed on 'super-toxic' strain ~ link

UK confirms E.coli cases linked to German outbreak - with video ~ link

Cucumbers cleared, sources of E.coli not yet found ~ link  

Thanks to Dr. Bill Deagle, MD, for his advice and to various readers of my blog for sending me links and information.  Stirling   

http://www.activistpost.com/2011/06/ecoli-outbreak-in-europe-is-biowar.html




Le soutien aux événements populaires et à la résistance est notre voie vers la libération



Abu-Suleyman1:51 AMNo comments








Damas - CPI 

www.palestine-info.info






Le Mouvement de la résistance islamique de Hamas a exprimé ses salutations et son soutien à la mobilité et les activités dirigées par le peuple palestinien à l'intérieur et au dispora (à l'étranger), considèrant cela comme un pas important vers le rétablissement des droits, en particulier le droit au retour, appelant à un soutien continu et de l'activer.

«Le soutien d'événements populaires et le mouvement de résistance est notre voie vers la libération, le retour et la défaite de l'occupation ", a confirmé le Hamas. 





Le Hamas a souligné, dans un communiqué, publié dimanche le 5/6,  à l'occasion du 44ème anniversaire de la Naksa (défaite) en Juin 1967, que «toutes ces années n'ont pas fait oublier les générations leur cause palestinienne, malgré toutes les tentatives d'effacement, et n'a pas perdu (peuple palestinien) Al-Aqsa et Jérusalem, malgré les régimes de démolition et de judaïsation".





Le Mouvement a rejeté la politique de la renonciation des droits et des constantes nationales, en face de l'intransigeance de l'occupation israélienne, qui ne connaît que les pratiques criminelles à l'établissement et de judaïsation, appelant à reconsidérer radicalement la façon de traiter avec cette entité colonialiste, et tracer une nouvelle stratégie basée sur la résistance, qui protège les constantes, et défendre les droits nationaux. 



En outre, le Hamas a inisisté sur l'attachement du peuple palestinien et son insistance sur la protection de Jérusalem et la Mosquée sainte d'al-Aqsa et de les défendre contre les attaques qui les visent à tous les jours à travers les campagnes de judaisation, de colonisation et de démolition, ainsi que par la modification de leurs paramètres, tout en considérant cette lutte un devoir légime saint, religieux et national et humanitaire, appelant "les États, les gouvernements, les peuples et les organisations à l'activer (la lutte)".





Israel kills 23 innocent Palestinians in the Golan and force her puppet Tantawi to close the Rafah border



Abu-Suleyman3:43 AMNo comments



WHAT REALLY HAPPENED AT THE RAFAH CROSSING

 The media covered the statement of opening Rafah passage Permanently ; Today we went to observe what’s happening at the entrance of Rafah and we were shocked with what we’ve witnessed!

Please watch the video to realize the truth of the circumstances at Rafah crossing.






Avant d'envahir la Libye, l'Algerie et l'Egypte la racaille juive sioniste sarkozyste, et ses larbins goys souchiens Guaino, derriere le bloc identitaire et les secteux talmudistes du Bn'ai Bret de Tapin et Cassens. Gueant, derriere Louis Aliot, l'Enrico de Perpignan, selon Soral, veulent mettre sous silence les Musulmans. En 1995, les sefarades de la DST-DRS avait fait sauter les bombes pour museler les Musulmans en France avant d'exterminer 550 000 algeriens pour garder le controle du petrole et du gaz. En 2011, la France-Israel souhaite une guerre civile directe et les fantoches de l'extreme droite juive sioniste sarkozyste, cameroniste ou merkeliste, wildeeriste en Europe sont partis prenantes. Les israeliens de France Prasquier, Gloasgen et Aliot veulent retirer la nationalité aux afro-maghrebins qui s'opposent aux plans de genocides et de division du maghreb et sa mise sous tutelle israelienne. La reponse est simple et sans detours, partez de France et laissez vos papiers a Paris, les afro-maghrebins de France et d'Europe soutiennent le droit des peuples maghrebins et africains a jouir du controle total de leur gaz, petrole, eau, phosphate, uraninuim, silicium, or, argent. Les elites franco-israeliennes n'ayant plus d'argent pour financer 2012, veulent une guerre civile en France pour se sauver par le haut, le racisme et ses lois de guerre civiles du Hidjab et Niqab sont issus de la secte talmudo-sioniste de la franc maconnerie et des sefarades l'a servant au Maghreb, dont le but est la guerre ouverte contre les Afro-maghrebins dont le controle leur echappe, cette haine leur vient du temps du Decret Cremieux et des champs de coton.... A ceux la il faut leur dire, quittez la France pour servir l'entité sioniste sinon taisez-vous a jamais dans la defaite !



Abu-Suleyman5:15 AM1 comment





 Non-Musulmans, observez cette carte, et regardez autours de vous ? N'est-ce pas le plan sioniste a l'oeuvre ? Lisez l'eschatologe issue du Qur'an et de la Sunnah, et vous verrez que les elites pro-sionistes sont responsables de la destruction economique de l'Europe et des Etats-Unis. Que les politiques sionistes mises en place s'orientent vers l'attaque de la Russie (considérés par les sionistes comme le Magog), en poussant les européens (considérés par les sionistes comme les gog) contre elle, que les israeliens de Washington sont derriere le demantelement et les guerres civiles actuelles dans le monde arabo-berbero-Musulman,  pour le soumettre au gendarme israelien, condition sine pour la venue de leur machiah, l'Antechrist-Dajjal. Il y a dix ans, les gens souriaient lorsque l'on disait que le 11 septembre etait une etape dans la prise de pouvoir par les israeliens d'occident et un coup d'Etat sioniste... Seul l'eschatologie Musulmane vous confirme les plans qui se deroulent sous vos yeux, et c'est l'une des raisons de la diabolisation de l'Islaam et des Musulmans. Lisez, cherchez dans le Qur'an et la Sunnah et vous y trouverez ce qu'Israel ne veut pas que vous compreniez !

 

La ' déferlante' islamophobe en Europe : un ramassis de néo-cons et d'ultra-sionistes, dirigé par Israël. Ayoob Kara, vice-ministre israélien et membre de la Knesset, se dit prêt à recevoir Marine Le Pen.  

 

Video au bas de la page : 

 L'English 'Jewish Defense League' est une creation des services anglais du MI5, dirigé par un ultra-sioniste, dont la famille vit dans une colonie en Palestine occupée. Le but pour Israel etant de museler les Musulmans en occident pour mieux lancer de nouvelles croisades au Moyen Orient. Il aurait fallu parler de Cameron, Sarkozy, Fini, Merkel tous pur produits du lobby israelien etats-unien qui se servent de ces mouvements d'extreme droite sioniste et de sondages bidonnés pour faire passer les interets d'Israel en premier, comme on le voit bien en Libye et en Egypte. Ces mouvements et les lois franc maconniques de provocation a la guerre civile contre les femmes musulmanes portant le Hidjab ou le Niqab-Sitar sont la partie visible de la strategie de l'extreme droite israelienne au pouvoir a Washington, Bruxelles et Tel Aviv dans la preparation a l'achevement final de la transition du pouvoir de Washington vers Jerusalem, comme le criminel de guerre sefarade algerien Attali le dit ouvertement maintenant avec son collegue Gilles Bernheim.... 

Pour le moment les Afro-maghrebins sont les seuls a pouvoir tenir tete aux israeliens de France et d'Europe comme on le voit a Paris ou le mossadnik a toutes les peines du monde a enchainer son plan de soumission, dans ce cadre la, Israel fera sauter ses bombes sales en Europe pour precipiter la guerre civile. 




Video au bas de la page:



1 comments:










lala_ghani402 said...
"You are the best of the nations raised up for
(the benefit of)men: you enjoin what is right and
forbid the wrong and believe in Allah." (3:llO)
http://freeislamicebooks.blogspot.com/
11:12 AM

How to Appoint a Khalif: Oath of Allegiance (Bay’a) or Election?



Abu-Suleyman1:30 PMNo comments











The milestones, for the process of appointing a leader by the masses, in any system are identical: nomination, selection and affirmation. First, the various candidates are nominated and declared; then the selection process decides the winner from amongst the nominated candidates, who effectively becomes the leader. Finally, the appointed leader affirms this publically through some sort of ceremony, for example, the US President’s inauguration, where the elected President takes an ‘oath’ to uphold the constitution, and start the Presidency. The third stage is merely the confirmation process, to openly declare what has already been decided in the selection stage.





In the tribal society of 7^th century Mecca, the process of nomination and selection was vastly simplified and merged, but the nation states of today, in comparison are far more complex and larger; various candidates will compete for power from amongst the millions of citizens. Hence, the processes are far more formal and structured. When the system is framed, these processes are codified, and the masses agree to obey the leader who is appointed through the selection process, this is where the contract takes place. The obedience of the masses is given to the leader appointed, on the condition that he upholds the constitution, and the laws and values.



This nomination and selection process has varied with time and place; hence, the Prophet (saw) was silent about who should succeed after his demise, and he was also silent about the process of appointing a Khalif; this is reflected in the variations in the appointment of the first four Khalifs, and the subsequent chaos that ensued through the rebellion of Mu’awiyah.



Given the complexity and the size of the nation states of today, there is broad endorsement for determining the leader in the selection process through election. The fact that the winner has the majority of the votes reflects a level of consensus, otherwise there is likely to be instability, especially where there are linguistic, sectarian and racial divides.



A similar process has to be used to appoint a Khalif. In any Muslim country, no individual will command complete support; there will always be various candidates competing for power, with varying levels of support. Election is the fairest way to determine the winner, as mass participation is a reality in today’s society, whereas in the tribal society of the 7^th century, the matter of leadership was decided by the few.



Once the candidate wins in the selection process, he is the Khalif by definition, to whom the oath of allegiance is given as an affirmation. There are clear evidences to obey the Khalif and give him the oath of allegiance (Bay’a). Note the Bay’a is given to the Khalif not that the Bay’a makes the Khalif, yet, there is confusion that some people argue that Bay’a is used to appoint the Khalif. One cannot offer their Bay’a to someone on the assumption that he will become a Khalif in the future; otherwise, such a Bay’a is nothing more than an expression of support or a vote for a particular candidate competing for the position of Khalif.



In reality, the Bay’a where one offers the pledge to obey the leader can only be given to someone who is already in a position of authority. Once a legitimate Khalif exists, the obligation to give him the Bay’a is stated in many Hadiths. Thus, Bay’a is the affirmation of a leader, it reaffirms the contract, it is not a means to appoint a Khalif and that has never been the case; this can be corroborated by examining the appointment of the first Khalif.



After the demise of the Prophet (saw), some of the people gathered in the court of Banu-Sa’ida, to appoint a leader. However, there were no formal processes in place; the nomination and selection took place at the same time, it was simply a matter of narrowing it down to one person. One candidate was from the Ansar (helpers of Medina) and three were proposed from the Muhajir (emigrants of Mecca). As part of the elimination process, it was agreed that the leader should be from the Quraysh of Mecca, who were already seen as leaders of the Arabs, and thus would be acceptable to the majority. This automatically ruled out the Ansar after they accepted this point of view.



From the Quraysh, the three candidates were proposed based on their seniority as companions. They all concurred on Abu-Bakr and he was selected as the leader, and given the Bay’a as affirmation there. Next day, he took Bay’a from others as confirmation of his leadership and acceptance. The masses came to give the Bay’a to the new Khalif. Note, this process was more or less confined to Medina; it being the centre of authority, where most of the influential and significant personalities resided, and their consent mattered as they represented the many. Other tribes did not actively participate, distance and time being a factor.



Another reason for the significance of Bay’a is that tribal societies are unruly (especially the Bedouins), as tribes functioned autonomously and they could rebel at any point in time. This is particularly important for Mecca, where various tribes came together and appointed a leader; the affirmation process was significant as each tribe functioned autonomously, each one like a unit or a miniature version of a nation. The oath of the tribal leaders confirmed their obedience and the masses they represented. Similarly, when the two leaders representing the two major tribes of Medina (Aws and Khazraj) offered their allegiance to the Prophet (saw), it represented all the members of the two tribes.



What if there was a dispute next day, and the people refused to give their Bay’a to Abu Bakr? One could only speculate in such a scenario there would have been further dialogue to decide on another candidate, and they would go through the nomination and selection process again; this sort of problem would reflect the lack of formalisation or codification of the process of appointing a new leader. The only person who was alleged to have some reservation was Ali, however, both the Shi’a and Sunni sources confirm that Ali did not lead a rebellion, at the very least he accepted the leadership with some regret perhaps, but this means he approved.



This selection process, and the subsequent Bay’a given needs to be codified, this will prevent rebellion like that of Muawiyah - subsequently Islamic history was plagued with such cases, leading to the state’s fragmentation.  The Bay’a is simply an affirmation process; one can hold public ceremonies where the influential people come to offer their allegiance to create further stability and quell any opportunists seeking to rise up using any pretext; collective affirmation in public would strengthen the legitimacy of the new Khalif.  





Yamin Zakaria (yamin@radicalviews.org)



Published on 7/6/2010



London, UK  

www.radicalviews.org

http://yaminzakaria.blogspot.com










9/11 Trial Judge Seeks to Dismiss Key Israeli Defendant




Abu-Suleyman10:27 AMNo comments



By Chris Bollyn,

www.bollyn.com



June 8, 2011


Ehud Olmert, the disgraced former prime minister of Israel is currently fighting for his life in an Israeli court.  Olmert, who was in New York City on a secret visit on 9/11, is a disciple of the notorious Israeli terrorist Yitzhak Shamir of the LEHI (Stern Gang).  Olmert is clearly one of the architects of the false-flag terrorism of 9/11.





Sources close to the 9/11 litigation have informed me that International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS), the Israeli defendant in the 9/11 terrorism case, was dismissed from the lawsuit last week.  Although I have not seen a court document that says that ICTS has been dismissed, there is a document from 12 May 2011 that clearly indicates that this move was on Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein's agenda for May 16.  Apparently ICTS had filed a motion to be dismissed from the lawsuit.  ICTS is the Israeli parent company of Huntleigh USA, the passenger screening outfit that allegedly allowed armed terrorists to board the planes in Boston on 9/11, according to the official version of events. 


The Zionist judge Alvin K. Hellerstein discussed dismissing ICTS, the Israeli defendant in the 9/11 litigation, as this 12 May 2011 court document from the Bavis family case shows.

Judge Hellerstein has a clear conflict of interest in the 9/11 litigation.  His son Joseph is a lawyer in Israel with Amit, Pollak, and Matalon, a law firm which represents the owners of ICTS and Huntleigh USA.  In 2001, ICTS was run by a team of Israelis including the Harel brothers, Boaz and Ezra, and Menachem Atzmon.  Atzmon is a convicted Israeli criminal who was involved in illegal fund-raising for the Likud party of Ehud Olmert, Ariel Sharon, and Menachem Begin.  Olmert was in New York City on the eve of 9/11 and probably remained to observe the crime.  Ezra Harel "died" at age 53 on his yacht off the coast of Spain in November 2003 after being indicted with his father Aryeh Mualem of serious financial fraud in Israel.

The only remaining wrongful death case is Mary Bavis vs UAL Corporation, et al.  This case represents the only 9/11 trial that will ever be held and should be of great concern to all Americans.  The flagrant conflict of interest on the part of the judge cannot be ignored.  Judge Hellerstein must be removed from the case and a new process begun for all of the 9/11 families who have not been treated fairly in the tort litigation.

The simplest way to remove Judge Hellerstein is to show that his son's law firm has represented the owners of ICTS and Huntleigh USA. I am doing that with the following documents to show that Amit, Pollak, and Matalon (Joseph Z. Hellerstein is "of counsel" with Amit, Pollak, and Matalon) represents entities that include the owners of ICTS:

Amit, Pollak, and Matalon represents BOS (Better Online Solutions), Cukierman Investments, and Catalyst Fund.  Edouard Cukierman is Chairman of the Board of Directors of BOS, the founder and CEO of Catalyst Funds, and the Chairman of Cukierman & Co Investment House.


Edouard Cukierman (left) is the founder and CEO of Catalyst Funds and Chairman of Cukierman & Co Investment House.  Here he poses with his partners Yair Shamir, son of the notorious Stern Gang terrorist Yitzhak Shamir, and Boaz Harel, owner of ICTS with his brother and other Israeli criminals on 9/11.


Yair Shamir is the son of the notorious terrorist Yitzhak Shamir.  Shamir served as prime minister of Israel from 1986 to 1992.  In 1987 a Mossadnik company owned by Shaul Eisenberg tried to get the security contract for the World Trade Center.  It was rejected because it was headed by known criminals.  Why was ICTS not rejected as a security company in U.S. airports for the same reason?

Cukierman is also Chairman of the Board of BOS, a.k.a. Better Online Solutions of Israel.
Source: http://www.boscorporate.com/?CategoryID=172

Boaz Harel, owner of ICTS, is President & Managing Partner at Cukierman Investments:


 Source:  Boaz Harel, President & Managing Partner of Cukierman Investments
http://www.cukierman.co.il/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=44%3Aboaz-harel&catid=9&Itemid=32#title

The following two legal documents show that Amit, Pollak, and Matalon of Tel Aviv is on the record as being legal counsel for Cukierman, Catalyst, and BOS.  They include such statements as this, "The validity of the ordinary shares, including the ordinary shares issuable upon conversion of the note and the exercise of the warrants, will be passed upon for us by Amit, Pollak, Matalon & Co., our Israeli counsel."

http://google.brand.edgar-online.com/EFX_dll/EDGARpro.dll?FetchFilingHTML1?ID=4126697&SessionID=Cx2VHv6UTlKsQP7

and: http://secwatch.com/filings/view.jsp?formid=7351724&page=1

Cukierman is also “an officer of the Israel Defense Forces Spokesman Unit”. This shows his connection to the state of Israel and its military forces.
Edouard Cukierman is the founder and CEO of Catalyst Investments and Chairman of Cukierman & Co. Investment House. He is also on the Board of Sar-El, an Israeli Defense Forces volunteer organization. He serves as an Officer of the IDF Spokesman Unit, and is part of the Hostage & Crisis Negotiation Team (Reserves). 






Chicago Cyberwar: USS Liberty vs. Red Dragon



Abu-Suleyman12:52 PMNo comments



by Captain Eric H. May,  Iconoclast Intelligence




The Israeli attack on the USS Liberty was piracy, The Star and Bones pirate flag says it all,



LIBERTY DAY, 2011 — Wednesday was the 44th anniversary of the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty, which killed 34 crewmen and wounded 171 on June 8, 1967.




Earlier that day Liberty’s crew had waved at Israeli flybys, never suspecting that the pilots meant to sink the ship and shoot the survivors. During the attack LBJ ordered efforts to reach the embattled ship to stand down, and the life-and-death struggle continued to rage until a Russian ship broadcast the situation to the world.







The USS Liberty, the US Navy and the USA had suffered a most ignominious day: attacked by allies, Judased by Johnson, saved by Soviets.





Pro-Israel Admiral John McCain, father of pro-Israel Senator John McCain, led the cover-up. The captain of the Liberty received the Medal of Honor for keeping quiet. The crew was split up and threatened into silence, according to the Chicago Tribune 2007 special report, The Strike on the USS Liberty.





We should commemorate Liberty Day as a companion to Independence Day. The Fourth of July recalls heroic revolution against tyranny, while the Eighth of June recalls bitter submission to tyranny. The Fourth is for joyous celebration; the Eighth for somber reflection. I don’t think George Washington would object to the idea. In his farewell address he cautioned that faction was dangerous because:


“It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which find a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passion. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.” — 1796





"You don’t ever want a crisis to go to waste; it’s an opportunity to do important things that you would otherwise avoid." -- Rahm Emanuel






The USS Liberty shows that in 1967 the Jewish Nation and the most powerful Jews in America conspired with Washington to send the Liberty to Egypt. They aimed to blame its destruction on the Egyptians, against whom they had just launched the Six-Day War. They meant to summon America into a Mideast war as a goyim golem (gentile zombie). With the USS Liberty, they tried to get everything that they would later get only after 9/11.





The dark truth is that the same foreign and domestic enemies of 1967 are even more dominant in contemporary America, according to LA Times Jewish columnist Joel Stein in his frank and factual How Jewish is Hollywood?





Liberty Day is outright ominous in Chicago, where Israeli Army veteran Rahm Emanuel, proud to be feared as a gangster, became the city’s first Jewish mayor last month.





He made Garry McCarthy, Giuliani’s right hand on 9/11, Chicago’s police chief. He made Jewish crony Michael Masters Cook County Homeland Security Director. He conducted terror training at the 88-story Aon Center on May 17, the day after his inauguration. Shortly afterwards he cancelled Chicago’s Independence Day celebration. Finally, today he began the three-day Red Dragon mass death exercises.



Rahm the Bomb circles Chicago the same way other Israelis circled the Liberty 44 years ago.



http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/06/08/chicago-cyberwar-uss-liberty-vs-red-dragon/







LIBYE : Les hélicoptères de combat préparent le débarquement



Abu-Suleyman12:57 PMNo comments


par Manlio Dinucci







Des hélicoptères de combat sous commandement OTAN ont été utilisés pour la première fois le 4 juin dans les opérations militaires en Libye : annonce du quartier général allié à Naples.  Ce sont des hélicoptères français Tigre et Gazelle et des Apache britanniques, dotés  des armements les plus modernes. Parmi eux le missile étasunien à conduite laser Hellfire, que les Tigre et Apache lancent à 8Kms de l’objectif, quand ils ne sont pas encore en vue. Utilisé en Libye aussi par les avions télécommandés étasuniens Predator/Reaper, il a une tête à fragmentation ou thermobarique. Cette dernière, en explosant, crée un vide d’air qui provoque la mort par asphyxie de toute personne se trouvant dans la zone, même si elle est à l’intérieur d’édifices ou de refuges. Dans la guerre de Libye, est certainement expérimenté aussi le Hellfire Romeo, le missile que Lockheed Martin a rendu encore plus destructeur.









En utilisant des hélicoptères d’attaque, l’OTAN non seulement intensifie l’offensive aérienne, mais (comme l’a écrit il manifesto le 28 mai) prépare le terrain au débarquement de troupes. Les hélicoptères qui sont en train d’attaquer en Libye sont ceux des navires d’assaut amphibie Tonnerre (français) et Ocean (britannique), postés face aux côtes libyennes sur lesquelles, au moment opportun, ils pourront débarquer des milliers de soldats et d’armes lourdes sur des engins rapides à coussin d’air. Le Tonnerre et l’Ocean ont déjà effectué des tests d’interopérabilité avec des navires étasuniens d’assaut amphibie analogues : ils peuvent donc utiliser les véhicules aériens et de débarquement du groupe d’attaque amphibie, conduit par le Uss Bataan, posté lui aussi en Méditerranée. Comme le Congrès a confirmé l’opposition de Washington à envoyer des troupes en Libye, pour ne pas s’embourber dans une autre guerre épuisante de longue durée, le scénario qui se profile est celui d’un débarquement -sous commandement et appui Usa- de troupes françaises, britanniques, italiennes et autres, éventuellement sous l’égide d’ « Eufor Libya » (Forces de l’Union européenne en  Libye) pour « fournir de l’aide humanitaire aux civils libyens ».

   L’intensification de l’offensive aérienne entre dans cette même stratégie. A la base de Gioia del Colle (Joie de la colline… NdT) (Bari), sont arrivées les Enhanced Paveway III : des bombes à conduite laser d’une tonne, dont les têtes pénétrantes à l’uranium appauvri et tungstène peuvent détruire des édifices renforcés. Pour le moment ce sont les chasseurs bombardiers britanniques Eurofighter et Tornado qui les utilisent, en décollant de la base des Pouilles. Ces bombes, explique le secrétaire général britannique à la défense Liam Fox, « nous permettent de protéger les civils et de réaliser les objectifs des Nations Unies »[1]. 

   En même temps, se trouve renforcé le blocus naval contre Tripoli. Et a commencé en Méditerranée la Phoenix Express 2011, manœuvre sous commandement étasunien à laquelle participent des forces navales et terrestres de treize pays : Etats-Unis, Italie, Espagne, Grèce, Malte, Croatie, Albanie, Turquie, Egypte, Algérie, Tunisie, Maroc et Mauritanie. Cette opération aussi est dirigée depuis Naples et supportée par les bases en Italie. Le pays qui -assure le président de la république, Giorgio Napolitano- a tourné le dos aux sales années du bellicisme fasciste et joue aujourd’hui un rôle de ferme gardien de la paix.



Edition de dimanche 5 juin 2011 de il manifesto

http://www.ilmanifesto.it/area-abbonati/in-edicola/manip2n1/20110605/manip2pg/02/manip2pz/304396/

Traduit de l’italien par Marie-Ange Patrizio







The War on Terror and It’s Motives



Abu-Suleyman2:15 PMNo comments



by Raja Mujtaba



 www.opinion-maker.org



“We have precise information that America wants to sabotage the Pakistani nuclear facilities in order to control Pakistan and to weaken the government and people of Pakistan,”Ahmadinejad told a news conference in Tehran.






“If what I reveal surprises and shocks the reader, please don’t develop an inferiority complex because I am frank to admit that although I have worked since 1911, trying to find out why the Human Race can’t live in peace and enjoy the bounties and blessing God provides for our use and benefit in such abundance ?  It was 1950 before I penetrated the secret that the wars and revolutions which scourge our lives, and the chaotic conditions that prevail, are nothing more or less than the effects of the continuing Luciferian conspiracy.  It started in that part of the universe we call heaven when Lucifer challenged The Right of God to exercise supreme authority.  The Holy Scriptures tell us how the Luciferian conspiracy was transferred to this world in the Garden of Eden.” Commander William Guy Carr – Pawns in the Game





By Raja G Mujtaba





Right from onset, this war had some deep hidden motives to encircle and destroy the Muslim world. After 9/11, George Bush in his State of the Union Address declared that it’s a crusade. As a hind sight, seeing the repercussions of this statement not only at home but all over the world, he back tracked his words but not his actions that got more hyper. This war is based on greed and lust to dominate, make every force to be submissive that has the potential to stand up to the Zionists.


Terrorism was created to justify the actions of war. The phony jargons to defeat the enemy is a ploy to create more hatred and more stiff reactions that can be termed as an act of terrorism. Muslims are no extremists or fanatics when seen in context of the Jewish fanatics. Why are the Jews ignored and Muslims targeted must be seen in proper context. Though every Jew is not a Zionist but every Zionist is a Jew therefore it has a natural affiliation for its kin. Islam is the only potent force that’s seen as stumbling block in the way of Zionists expansion. This makes it necessary for the Zionists to eliminate this threat once for all.


If one studies the pattern of attacking the so called terrorists, the killing is not precise but spread far and beyond. Repeatedly, social gatherings, funerals, children schools and even the Jirgas have been attacked killing innocent people. When confronted, the ISAF and NATO commanders have brushed it aside as collateral killings, a new vocabulary coined in this so called war. Collaterals are desired by the US as that helps the Zionist agenda of escalating the war into other areas. These killings fan more hatred, reaction and resistance serving multiple interests of the Zionist Corporate World.







The war on terror cannot be won by killing people but by addressing its root causes, this must be known to the people in Pakistan and Afghanistan in particular. Giving a blind support with hands folded to the West means working as their mercenaries. This is precisely the reason why Pakistan army earned a bad name with the people of Pakistan during the Musharraf era. General Ashfaq Kayani retrieved the situation to a very favorable one but then starting from Raymond Davis it started to slip back again. The zenith came with Abbottabad and PNS Mehran attacks. People were quite use to silence or wrong reporting of the political governments but a prolonged silence by the military leadership, people still not knowing the facts are fast losing trust in the military leadership too.



The causes can be more than one but primarily it’s either suppression, deprivation, social injustice or a political denial. No one talks of the causes because those involved in the so called War on Terror are the perpetuators of these causes. All they talk is the destruction or defeat of the end product of these causes.



In the recent episode of Defence and Diplomacy, I found nothing new that could be a paradigm shift in addressing the war on terror. All what is being talked is what the west says and we promote it verbatim. Now is the time that after three major security disasters inflicted upon us by our so called friend the US and her partners in the crime, RAW and Mossad Pakistan should demand and open enquiry into 9/11. Lt General Mahmood Ahmad, former DG ISI was present in the Pentagon building holding meetings. Certainly he would have much more firsthand information than anyone else in Pakistan.



If Pakistan can and that it must press for a free and fair investigation into 9/11 that has been dubbed as a big lie, this never ending war can be brought to an end. Not only must that people behind this crime against humanity be brought to a public trial.







Like a war is not the solution to problem, killing people by labeling them as extremists, fanatics or terrorists would never be a solution; perhaps seeking an end to this war is not on the agenda. Like a vicious circle this war is being made to grow at a phenomenal pace simultaneously spreading it to other countries in the region.



The modern wars are being fought in the human minds and not in the mountains and caves. What happens in the mountains and caves is just a moping operation. Global electronic media, 95% of which is owned and dominated by the Zionists is busy building perceptions. What to talk of Pakistan, Muslim world as a whole has nothing to counter it. Al-Jazera that was started with a bang has also been bought by Murdoch, the Zionist media tycoon.



“In order to understand the Causes in the past, which have produced the Effects we experience to- day, especially in regard to the unsatisfactory state of national and international affairs, history must be studied because history does repeat itself.  History repeats itself because there has been perfect continuity of purpose in the struggle which has been going on since the beginning of Time between the forces of Good and Evil to decide whether the Rule of Almighty God, shall prevail, or whether the world shall literally go to the Devil.  The issue is just as simple as that.” Commander William Carr. The study of William Carr holds very true but we have decided not to learn from history instead bow down to every evil force that appears much stronger in machine power but is void of any moral ground.







Even today, wars are developed with same motives relatively with more sophistication. Perceptions are built to carry the people along; false flags are staged to make the threats look real. In such false flags innocent people are planted without them knowing about it. People are befriended and then betrayed like Faisal Shahzad in Times Square, a bunch of students were sent to Pakistan apparently to attend some wedding and then nabbed in for planning some act of terrorism. People arrested in such staged acts are held in secrecy, their investigations are never made public, and their fate is never known. The family members of such detainees when lose hope turn violent.



9/11 was needed to start the 3^rd World War and that too against Islam, that’s why the characters and actors so selected for this act were all Muslims; this was to give the Muslims a bad name so that people demand that Islam and the Muslims be attacked. Pre and post 9/11, well directed media hype was created, the world was given a shock treatment, their senses were maimed, and their minds could not think anything but accept what was being thrown out by the media. Not only the US but the whole world went into a shock, Muslims became a pariah, they were taken as an outcast not fit to live in this world hence must be taken out.



As the dust settled, more sane minds came out to study and investigate 9/11. All the private studies and investigations have come to the same conclusion that it was a false flag staged by in house forces where CIA and Mossad were more pronounced. But by the time these reports came out the damage had been done; UNO was mobilized, sanctions against the Taliban regime were obtained, forces were mobilized and an unprecedented and unwarranted attack was launched on Afghanistan. Not resting here, Saddam Hussain was linked with WMDs and possible linkages with Al-Qaida………







Pakistan has failed miserably in managing and developing its perception. In fact there is no effort in this direction. All the efforts and energies are wasted in developing cult leadership and party perceptions. Ministry of information does not represent or project Pakistan but the party in power.



Pakistan media has developed her own agendas. Now they dictate their policies, although the media should be following the guidelines issued by the government but instead seeing a weak or a self centered government they blackmail the government and dictate their own agendas.



Accepting Marc Grossman a known Zionist who is actively involved in spreading  the Zionist agenda by Pakistan only shows that how submissive and unconcerned are the leaders who had no guts to refuse him as an ambassador.





Ten years have passed; the people of Pakistan have not accepted this so called war on terror to be Pakistan’s war. General Parvez Musharraf bought this war as a package to get legitimacy for his rule. Much before 9/11, the plans were announced by Washington that the preparations to attack Afghanistan had been finalized; General Ziny was to visit Pakistan after the 2000 elections to tie up the details.





There were no terrorists in Afghanistan, only the people who defied the corporate world of America for an oil pipeline that was to originate from central Asia, pass through Afghanistan and Pakistan for onward dispatch to the free world via ships from Pakistan’s ports. Unicol





Defence industrial complex were the stake holders in Unicol. 2008 financial crisis forced the Americans to push ahead with a war that they are losing even today.



Prior to 9/11, two attacks were staged on American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania later followed by an attack in Yemen on USS Cole. This was made an excuse to attack Afghanistan where Osama was having his camp. How Osama survived also needs to be studied. More than likely prior to the attack, information was leaked to him so he moved out well in time.



Osama was never a target or a person in crime who was wanted but his image was built through media perceptions in such a manner that as the twin towers were struck, Osama and al-Qaida were the first names on everyone’s lips that he had struck sitting from his caves.



On the breakup of USSR, a US general was questioned by a journalist of any further utility of NATO. The general was sharp to reply, “The enemy has changed from red to green, and hence NATO will stay.”



NATO was created to counter Warsaw pact countries that had a decisive strength to overrun Europe thus all the countries of the Western Europe and America were brought together in this alliance on both sides of Atlantic. 







NATO as per its charter had no justification to be outside of Europe but it was brought to Afghanistan to further the aims of Zionist dominated West that gets its legal cover for any military adventurism from the Security Council of the UNO.



West is here in Afghanistan as a staging ground to attack Pakistan before it can take on the rest of the Muslim world for its oil and other mineral resources. To do so, the US and the key players like UK, France, Germany, Israel and India the new member of this club devised a plan to deplete Pakistan’s military within her own lands. To do so, TTP was created and patronized by the US. TTP is constantly being watched and funded to draw the Pakistan army thin, create internal strife, to further destabilize Pakistan. Another important link i.e. Karakorum highway is also being targeted to delink Pakistan from China.



Without defanging Pakistan, the Zionist West cannot move forward to further splinter the Muslim world to a size that’s manageable with no extra effort.





Pakistan government, a stooge that it is has declared the war on terror to be Pakistan’s war. The rulers are from the feudal class who own large tracts of land where the peasants are employed almost for free and made captives. These peasants have no say, nor can they protect themselves or their families from the wrath and the lust of the feudal.



The basic cause that has led to these terrorist activities have never been addressed or even identified. The rulers simply take the vocabulary from the west and use it boastfully making it repeatedly known that Pakistan is not fighting America's war but it’s Pakistan’s war.





S M Hali hosted former ambassador Aslam Rizvi and Salama Malik in his talk show ‘Defence and Diplomacy,’ where both the analyst was supporting the western point of view with some changed phrases. Both have given it the legitimacy of being a Pakistan’s war that Pakistan must win.





In the university of Sydney, Australia, the students have been tasked to write a media theme based on assumption that Laskar e Taiba, that has no history of terrorism other than the participation in the freedom struggle of Kashmir under Indian occupation, in league with Al-Qaida have obtained a nuclear device that has been planted in Washington. It is said that the professor who has given this assignment is a Hindu of Indian origin. Through this hypothecation, very subtly Pakistan has been brought under focus as a center for terrorist activities. Once this paper is developed by the students, as process of this theme would have assumed that it’s not a hypothecation but a reality. Then these papers would be circulated around the world and to the media that would hype it as a fact or an attempt to have placed a device in Washington.



It has also been reported in the Wikileaks that over 500 people from Balochistan are being kept and trained in Afghanistan by a joint collaboration of US-Israel-India. Pakistan is a priority target of this troika for the following reasons.



The only Muslim nuclear power with an elaborate delivery system.
A well trained and professional army.
A close ally of China that is perceived a threat to Troika’s expansionist designs.




Terrorism is a self created phenomenon of the west to find a reason to have a military foothold in the Muslim world. One of the major objectives is to redefine Mid East under Greater Middle East Initiative where every Muslim country stretching from Pakistan to Morocco is broken down into smaller states and Israel would be expanded much beyond its present frontiers that would include portions of Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon and Egypt. This would give Israel the necessary geographical expansion to be able to keep the Muslim world under her control.





When I say that the US, Israel and Bharat (India) are the Troika heading towards destruction of the world is not unfounded gut feeling. The Hindu-Zionist roots can be seen from here, “So let me state the obvious here, which western anti-Hindu, and increasingly anti-Zionist (meaning anti-Semitic), academics do not wish to state. The obvious fact I am referring to its that it was India, that is Bharata, land of ancient Vedic civilization unbroken after millennia, which was the only country in the Jewish Diaspora where Jews lived completely unmolested by the host community, in this case the Hindus, going back at least 2000 years. Even their eventual exodus from the ancient land of Bharata (India) was not caused by fear of persecution, but the desire to rebuild what was once the ancient Jewish homeland. Unlike the Hindus, who have an interrupted civilization for 10,000 years based upon the soil of India, the Jews, also heirs to an ancient culture, were condemned to preserve their without a central location, and instead dispersed among the nations of the world, until such time as they could return to their Punyabhoomi (Sacred Soil) in 1948.” HINDU PRO-ZIONISM AND PHILO-SEMITISM. This work is dedicated to Hindu revolutionary, social reformer, rationalist, intellectual, political ideologue, and freedom fighter for Indian independence, Vinayak (Veer) D. Savarkar (1883-1966), an uncompromising supporter of the Zionist project.





Now the sudden surge in fostering deep relations with India, the US that has also taken the color of Zionism has Israel at its back. They have a common goal and designs on which this new but deep rooted troika that’s out to destroy the world so as to take control of the entire resources that so happen to be located in the Muslim world, Africa and South America. This goal can only be achieved by extending the military reach in these regions for which the easiest and most hyped cause is the so called War on Terror.



Taliban, a very primitive Afghan group who had no recourse to any modern technology or gadgetry were no threat to anyone around the world.





The world need not fear Islam that stands for peace through justice but the emergence of this new troika that is extending its fangs around the world to crush, bleed and kill for domination of the world.



Let it be known to all that you can fight a common accepted enemy but you cannot and should not fight your brother at the behest of your enemy, in this case the US. You may hit your brother once or twice but then for the rest of your life you would be an outcast and never trusted by your brothers. This is exactly what we are going through today and fighting our own kith and kin at every front.





“We have precise information that America wants to sabotage the Pakistani nuclear facilities in order to control Pakistan and to weaken the government and people of Pakistan,” Ahmadinejad told a news conference in Tehran.



The United States would then use the UN Security Council “and some other international bodies as levers to prepare the ground for a massive presence [in Pakistan] and weaken the national sovereignty of Pakistan,”



Commander William Guy Carr says, If what I reveal surprises and shocks the reader, please don’t develop an inferiority complex because I am frank to admit that although I have worked since 1911, trying to find out why the Human Race can’t live in peace and enjoy the bounties and blessing God provides for our use and benefit in such abundance?  It was 1950 before I penetrated the secret that the wars and revolutions which scourge our lives, and the chaotic conditions that prevail, are nothing more or less than the effects of the continuing Luciferan conspiracy.  It started in that part of the universe we call heaven when Lucifer challenged The Right of God to exercise supreme authority.  The Holy Scriptures tell us how the Luciferian conspiracy was transferred to this world in the Garden of Eden.  Until I realized that our struggle is not with flesh and blood, but with the spiritual forces of darkness who control all those in high places on this earth (Eph. 6:12) the pieces of evidence gathered all over this world just didn’t fit together and make sense.  (I am not ashamed to admit that the “Bible” provided the “Key” which enabled me to obtain an answer to the question quoted above.)





Very few people seem able to appreciate that Lucifer is the brightest and most intelligent of the heavenly host and, because he is a pure spirit, he is indestructible.  The scriptures tell us his power is such that he caused one-third of the most intelligent of the heavenly host to defect from God, and join him, because he claimed God’s Plan for the rule of the universe is weak and impractical because it is based on the premise that lesser beings can be taught to know, love, and wish to serve him voluntarily out of respect for his own infinite perfections.  The Luciferian ideology states might is right.  It claims beings of proven superior intelligence have the right to rule those less gifted because the masses don’t know what is best for them.  The Luciferian ideology is what we call totalitarianism to-day.







Guerre entre factions sionistes Rotschield-Netanyahu-Cameron-Merkel-Sarkozy contre Rockfeller-Brzezinski pour le commandement de la domination imperiale sioniste



Abu-Suleyman8:06 AMNo comments



 C'est presque ca, mais l'auteur de l'article ne semble pas avoir compris que de cette guerre entre factions sionistes en occident, Russie, Chine; Israel doit prendre l'ascendant en declenchant de nouvelles guerres regionales et un super 11 septembre avec bombes radiologiques en Europe. Le second point qui n'est pas correct est le soutien direct de Brzezinsky en Afghanistan aux reseaux Arabes de Moudjahidines, c'est pas entierement ca, mais bon ca tient la route comme article et c'est le plus proche de la realité qui ait été ecrit sur le net en ce moment sur cette affaire. Maintenant que DSK et Sarkozy s'entretuent ...  



AS





DSK:Un fusible dans la guerre secrète entre WASPS et juifs.



La Russie a donné une première explication rationnelle: DSK aurait eu la preuve que le stock d'or de fort Knox est manquant et qu'il ne pouvait donc plus l'utiliser pour venir soutenir une monnaie mondiale basée sur les DTS (Droits de Tirage Spéciaux) voulus par le FMI pour répondre à la crise.
Cette information est éminemment susceptible de remettre en cause tout l'ordre mondial monétaire international et précipiter une banqueroute planétaire puisque la Chine, première créditrice des bons du trésor US, exige d'avoir une contrepartie en or. Or elle aurait trouvé que l'or envoyé par les USA en garantie est faux! Malgrè toutes les tentatives des sénateurs US, notamment de Ron Paul, dernièrement l'info n'a pas été commentée par le gouvernement Obama. Se pourrait-il alors que cette découverte et sa tentative de départ vers la France ait précipité sa chute pour le discréditer?

DSK est un juif. Il fait partie d'une communauté hyper puissante aux USA et en occident, qui rêve d'établir un gouvernement mondial avec comme capitale Jérusalem. Un empire sioniste quoi. Les WASPS ( White Anglo Saxons Protestant) partagent avec eux la volonté de domination impérialiste, et sont alliés avec les juifs pour le contrôle financier du monde ( alliance Rothschild-Rockefeller) mais ont une autre vision. Les WASPS veulent continuer de faire de l'Amérique le centre de contrôle du monde. Il se pourrait donc que cette divergence d'objectif fondamentale entre les deux communautés prédatrices occidentales soit à l'origine de la chute de DSK.

Aux USA on le sait ces deux communautés ont théorisé leur vision du monde. Les néo-conservateurs de Samuel Hutington professent le choc des civilisations pour déstabiliser le moyen-orient, attaquer l'Islam pour faire place nette à l'hégémonie sioniste. Les néos-libéraux sous la houlette de Brezinsky ont eux une autre vision: ils veulent asseoir la puissance US dans le siècle qui vient en empêchant à d'autres superpuissances d'émerger. Les ennemis sont clairement identifiés: la Chine et la Russie.
Il s'agira donc pour les WASPS d'utiliser les menaces islamistes contre ces superpuissances et non de les attaquer frontalement. C'est Zbignew Brezinsky, coopté par David Rockefeller, premier conseiller stratégique d'Obama, qui a formé Ben Laden à la guerrilla pour embourber le géant russe en Afghanistan.

Cette volonté de garder le leadership US ne prendra donc pas pour cible principal l'Iranmais toutes les puissances nucléaires non fiables pour l'empire. La première visée sera le Pakistan. Il faudra renverser ce régime et mettre en place un fantoche à la solde des USA pour éviter tout risque d'auto-défense en cas d'attaque occidentale contre un régime islamique.
L'Inde sera sur la liste si elle poursuit ses ambitions d'incarner un nouveau pôle en coopération avec des puissances émergentes comme le Brésil, le Vénézuela. La guerre en Libye aura été d'abord une vraie attaque de l'Otan contre des intérêts chinois et russes en Afrique. Khadafi pourtant considéré comme un sioniste fiable et d'abord défendu par des milices sionistes a été attaqué parce qu'il envisageait des partenariats étroits avec la Chine et le Russie. Inacceptable pour les Wasps qui contrôlent le pétrole.

Il est donc intéressant d'intégrer cette grille de lecture géopolitique mondiale si l'on veut tenter de comprendre. Le rétropédalage russe sur son soutien à la Syrie et à Kadhafi montre que des grands bouleversements géostratégiques sont en cours avec comme objectif contenir l'expansion chinoise en intégrant la Russie dans le camp occidental. La reconnaissance diplomatique de Ouattara par le leader iranien montre la même envie de la part de ce pays de ne pas être exclu du jeu géostratégique en cours qui permettra une distribution des rôles sur le contrôle et l'approvisionnement en pétrole et gaz dans le monde. L'alliance Turquie-Chine-Iran semble avoir vécue.

Finalement dans ce grand domino mondial de redistribution des cartes l'avenir d'Israël n'est toujours pas réglé au plus haut niveau. La communauté sioniste défend becs et ongles son état mais celui-ci est une épine dans le pied du domino anti-chinois en train de se mettre en place et incluant la Turquie et l'Iran. C'est d'ailleurs pour cela que les états du monde poussent une résolution dure contre Israël en réclamant un retour aux frontières de 1967 ce qui constituerait une défaite politique majeure pour l'entité sioniste. Israël se trouve donc devant un choix: soit se soumettre à la nouvelle géopolitique voulue par les WASPS, soit prendre le risque de se retrouver isolée dans le concert des nations.

Ceci permet de mieux comprendre la guerre occulte et d'influence que se livre au sommet des USA, pierre angulaire militaire de cette nouvelle géopolitique internationale, entre les WASPS et les juifs sionistes. La stratégie juive se sachant moins nombreuse que les WASPS eux-mêmes moins nombreux que les vagues d'immigrations, sera d'instrumentaliser l'immigration à son profit comme elle le fait dans tous les pays occidentaux, tout en faisant exactement l'inverse en Israël notez-le bien. En se voulant défenseur des droits des minorités, des sans-papiers et de l'antiracisme, les juifs entendent bien saper la domination des WASPS aux USA et en occident.

Il est d'ailleurs amusant de constater que dès le lendemain de sa déclaration pro-palestinienne, Obama soit allé devant l'AIPAC rassurer Israël sur les intentions de soutien militaire des USA. Israël sert encore l'empire dans cette région mais l'ultrasionisme risque de se retourner contre lui en liguant les opinions internationales contre Israël. Les flotilles de la liberté sont organisées surtout par des WASPS irlandaisIl va donc être temps de faire pression sur Israël pour qu'il revienne à plus de raison et accepte la création d'un état palestinien. C'est là tout l'enjeu de cette fin d'année diplomatique internationale. DSK n'aura été qu'un fusible actionné par la puissance WASPS pour faire pression sur les sionistes. Les WASPS s'empressent de choisir Mme Lagarde, proche de Brezinsky, pour remplacer le juif DSK à la tête du FMI et donc le mettre sous contrôle.
Et nous? Peuple neutre, d'autres cultures et d'autres religions? On sert d'appoint ou de punching-ball suivant les intérêts des uns ou des autres…


http://cameroonvoice.com/news/news.rcv?id=3906






Ghost Troop Greatly Reduces Red Dragon



Abu-Suleyman1:04 PMNo comments



By Captain Eric H. May, Ghost Troop CO


6/10/11 — RED DRAGON, Chicago’s mass-death exercise, will yield the field today, unsuccessful but unharmed. Ghost Troop, the military intelligence/public affairs volunteer unit that led Chicago’s defense, will regroup and recover. 

We have demonstrated once again that cyber cavalry can predict and thereby prevent harm. This is what cavalry has always done, and we simply do it in a new theater of war.


The dreadful dragon, False Flag, has been detoured but not deterred, and certainly not defeated. Called into being by cabals and cabalists, he will disappear into darkness, then slumber in silence, ready to return.
Many who saw him will soon tell themselves that it was all a fairy tale by a crazy captain. False Flag might have attacked New York on 9/11, Madrid on 3/11, London on 7/7 and Mumbai on 7/11, but he wasn’t about to attack Chicago on 6/6/11, 6/9/11 or 6/11/11, nor will he attack on 7/7/11 or 7/11/11. In fact, just talking about False Flag and the Cabala Cabal is antisocial and antisemitic.

Review the past and you will preview the future.

I led a Chicago mission very much like this one back in 2006. It was likewise successful but inconclusive. William B. Fox, a Harvard grad and a Marine major, published an article on the evidence that implicated Mayor Richard M. Daley and Governor Rod Blagojevich in a 5/3 false flag attempt during large-scale military exercises similar to those ending today.

My Veterans Today archive has the best edition of my 2011 spring articles anticipating and analyzing Red Dragon. Four of the most important:

3/31/11, Nuke Coded 329211 a Real Threat evaluates Chicago as the nation’s top terror target in the wake of a Chicago FBI announcement that it had received more than two dozen nuclear threats.
5/3/11, Chicago delenda est! Rahm the Bomb takes aim! summarizes the reasons I anticipated Red Dragon five weeks before it occurred.
5/17/11, Netanyahu Now in USA for False Flag ASAP! emphasized the dangerous factors that day in Chicago, at the same time that Security Director News revealed that Chicago’s 88-story Aon Center had been holding unusual terror training.
6/6/11, Chicago Red Dragon Six-Day Warning explains my alert for 6/6/11 – 6/11/11, which remains in effect until midnight Saturday.
Refer to my America First Books archive for my articles and interviews since 2005, dozens of which relate to the false flag project in Chicago.

Red Dragon was no fairy tale, nor was it a bad dream; it was a vision of things to come. I pray that the episode will be an epiphany to many, for that is what is needed. Unless America learns how Ghost Troop stalemated false flags in the past, it will be checkmated in the future.






Décès du cheikh combattant, Mohamed Shoumaa, l’un des fondateurs du Hamas



Abu-Suleyman4:18 AMNo comments









Gaza – CPI 

www.palestine-info.info





Vendredi 10 juin est décédé le chef fondateur et le président du Conseil de la Shoura (consultation) du mouvement du Hamas en Palestine, le cheikh combattant, le professeur éducateur Mohamed Hassan Shoumaa, à l’âge de 76 ans. Il rend l’âme après un long chemin de combat avec le cheikh Ahmed Yassin, passé dans la prédication, l’éducation et le Jihad. Il a connu les arrestations et la torture, et est décédé trois jours après avoir subi un accident vasculaire cérébral.





Adham Abou Salmia, porte-parole des services d’urgences et de secours dans la bande de Gaza, a confirmé à notre correspondant que le cheikh est décédé à l’hôpital Shifa dans lequel il avait été transféré après son AVC mercredi dernier.





Shoumaa, qui était dans sa huitième décennie, était l’un des dirigeants des Frères musulmans, l’un des fondateurs du mouvement du Hamas et l’un de ceux qui l’ont poussé à son summum. Il a subi de nombreuses arrestations et il présidait le Conseil d’administration des écoles exemplaires de Dar al-Arqam.





Les funérailles solennelles du cheikh Shoumaa sont prévues cet après midi dans la bande de Gaza, à partir de la Grande Mosquée Omari, avec une importante participation des dirigeants, responsables et amis du cheikh.








Jewish 'English' Defense League, MOD, Israel, the future of David Cameron and the next major false flag 'Olympic games' scheduled for August 2011 in London



Abu-Suleyman5:16 AMNo comments



Islamic intelligence with his sources was the only blog in the net to announce a major false flag operation for mid-august 2011 in London, similar to the one conducted by the israelis running MOD in 2006 with the 'Heathrow fake chemical bombs' false flag. The coming one is related to the Zion 2012 Olympic Games, use as a pretext to raid innocent Muslims in the Eastern parts of London. Plan is designed to expel any Muslim participation in the Olympic Games security preparation to make Israel bomb the stadium without being seen ? 



No, the plan is start a 'racial civil war', declare openly a full zionist dictatorship through emergency laws under the 'anti-terror act' legislation before the second major wave of the global economic crisis, which will put UK under total chaos this autumn 2011 (and likely to provoke the fall of the government under a huge popular street uprising in the Spanish and Greek styles).  Plan is to 'neutralize' firstly the 'enemy capable of destruction of the zionist banksters ruling the country: Irish and Muslims', then to impose a total military dictatorship over all the people in the UK, then EU. 






The EDL is an MOD front group for the 'Security Services' as the Troubles [WAR] in Ireland is back on. The EDL are a strange bunch and while they are using Islam as an excuse or tool their real agenda is support the Zionist banksters dictatorship over UK/Ireland. The EDL are mostly from the army, ex-army, police, navy, RAF, MI5, MI6, special branch etc, and they are putting together a lawless paramilitary street squad of killers and batterers to implement this plan.  All the 'active' members are already identified and linked through NATO clandestine terror networks, disguised as 'paramilitary forces', working to enslave people under the cartel of the zionist  banksters and their war criminals political puppets.  









English Defence League MI5 & Special Branch Ploy? Olympics Emergency Measures?

 

There are a number of articles and blogs claiming that the English Defence League [EDL] are a state founded and state funded trap. People from the left and right wing are saying that the something about EDL doesn't add up. Many are saying [probably rightly] that they are a front for MI5 and Special Branch. If that's the case do Muslims, mosques and others have the right to prosecute MI5 for racism?

Are the heads of MI5, Special Branch, NETCU etc behind this? Is tax payers money that could be used to keep people and property safe being mis spent on a state sponsored trap? Are MI5 deliberatly stirring up racial hatred? Are the EDL formed to trap football fans etc before the Olympics? [Possibly]. If this is the case the state will have reason to inflict control orders or emergency measures on sports fans [and working class / underclass areas] before and during the Olympics.

The Elections are due, could this be a ruse by the current government to discredit the British National Party? Are they trying to get the BNP proscribed by creating a uniform wearing, demonstrating, political "BNP" thug outfit?

Are they trying to get Muslim youth to mobilise? Is this a trap to get THEM?

What is clearly unusual about this is that BNP's Chris Renton is a key player but the youth leader Joel Titus is Black and the facebook admins are Black and Asian. Chris Renton is said to organise the internet side of things with them. Why would someone from the BNP [a gold card member] be behind such a group?

The placards used by the EDL all look like they've been done as a joke. The "Gert" placards...Geert Wilders spelled wrongly. The Burka placards which use a picture of a man in a burka. The "serious" website that tells people not to sing the Allah songs etc. Yet there are very articulate, well read and educated people writing about Islam on the website.

Most of the people on the marches are working class lads [mostly men although some women] who are gald to be a part of something "for us". A lot of money has been put into and is being made out of this...for what?

Experienced activists are saying that there is something not right about the EDL. Bloggers have pictures of the riot police taking away Weyman Bennet with the caption : "This is how the EDL deal with lard arse" implying that they think that the EDL are the police or run by the police. If they are the police then the police are running around attacking Muslims and smashing up shops. It has been said before that the head of MI5 has links to David Irving and dodgy oil connections. Could he be behind the EDL attacks? Is he using the EDL to get at Muslims AND the British National Party? Two birds with one stone.

Some claim that they are UAF. Even Nick Griffin has denounced them as a state set up. He could be right. If it turns out that he is right, how mnay EDL are in on it? Something sure is strange about the English Defence League, that much is true and alot of people are saying it. While a lot of groups get accused of this..this is far more apparent with the EDL than with any other group.




Nonnie Mouze



http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/world/2010/03/448172.html








Pro-Israelis Are Turning The West Into An Islamophobic Dictatorship



Abu-Suleyman9:09 AMNo comments



Pro-Israelis Turning U.S. into Islamophobic Police State

By Maidhc Ó Cathail,

http://maidhcocathail.wordpress.com/






The recent call by U.S. Senator Charles Schumer for increased rail safety funding and the creation of a “no-ride” list for Amtrak trains is yet another reminder of just who is stoking fear of Muslims in America.







In an interview last year with a Jewish radio talk show in New York, Senator Schumer said he believed that HaShem (an Orthodox Jewish term for “God”) gave him the name “Schumer” — which means “guardian” — so that he could fulfill his “very important” role in the U.S. Senate as a “guardian of Israel.” Presumably, Schumer’s God-given role also includes turning the country he is actually paid to represent — the United States — into an Islamophobic police state. 





Americans wondering what happened to their freedoms since 9/11 need to understand the key role played by ardent pro-Israelis like Schumer in undermining their civil liberties under the guise of protecting them from terrorism. 







On October 11, 2001, exactly one month after 9/11, Senator Joe Lieberman introduced a bill to establish the Department of Homeland Security. Since then, “the No. 1 pro-Israel advocate and leader in Congress” has been the main mover behind such draconian legislation as the Protect America Act of 2007, the Enemy Belligerent, Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010, and the proposed Terrorist Expatriation Act, which would revoke the citizenship of Americans accused of providing “material support” to a foreign terrorist organization, i.e. groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah that are legitimately resisting Israeli occupation and aggression. Lieberman, who was Barack Obama’s mentor when he entered the Senate, has even proposed a bill which would give the president the power to kill the Internet in the event of a so-called “national cyber-emergency.” 





Although it would be hard to think of anyone who has done more to undermine American freedoms than Joe Lieberman, Michael Chertoff runs him a close second. A mere 45 days after the September 11 attacks, the infamous 342-page document known as the USA PATRIOT Act was signed into law. It was co-authored by Chertoff, then head of the Justice Department’s criminal division. Chertoff, whose mother, Livia Eisen, was an El Al air hostess believed to have had links to the Mossad, was appointed secretary of Homeland Security in 2005, after having been endorsed for the job by Senators Schumer and Lieberman. 





Since he left public service in 2009, Chertoff co-founded the Chertoff Group, a security and risk-management firm, whose clients include a manufacturer of full-body scanning machines. After a young Nigerian without a passport — the so-called Christmas Day “underwear bomber” — was allowed, in the words of Haaretz, to “slip through” security at Schiphol Airport by the Israeli security firm, ICTS International (which was established by former members of Israel’s internal security service, the Shin Bet), the former Homeland Security chief was all over the mainstream media touting full-body scanners as the answer to America’s airline security problems. 





On September 11, 2001, within hours of planes having struck the World Trade Center (recently leased by an extraordinarily “lucky” Larry Silverstein, a friend of not one but four Israeli prime ministers), the then former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak dropped into the BBC studios in London to interpret what the attacks would mean for travellers’ civil liberties. “In this area, we will suffer,” Barak confidently suggested. “It will not be so easy to go aboard an airplane in the near future. But we have no way but to stand firm facing terror. Otherwise, all our way of life will be threatened.” 





Later that evening, Benjamin Netanyahu let slip that the deaths of almost 3,000 Americans was “very good” for Israel. In particular, the mass murder proved to be very good for an emerging sector of the Israeli economy. In “Laboratory for a Fortressed World,” Naomi Klein detailed the post-9/11 “explosion of Israel’s homeland security sector.” Writing in 2007, Klein observed: “Before 9/11 homeland security barely existed as an industry. By the end of this year, Israeli exports in the sector will reach $1.2 billion — an increase of 20 percent.” 





Consequently, Americans concerned about what “homeland security” is doing to their civil liberties need to be asking: Exactly whose “homeland” and whose “security” is being protected by the likes of Schumer, Lieberman and Chertoff? 





It certainly isn’t America’s. 
Maidhc Ó Cathail is an investigative journalist and Middle East analyst.

http://maidhcocathail.wordpress.com/2011/06/10/pro-israelis-turning-u-s-into-islamophobic-police-state/







Israel's Biological warfare : Captain May Witnessed: Dr. Kelly Assassinated!



Abu-Suleyman3:47 AMNo comments



Since yesterday’s Veterans Today publication of Attorney general rules against Dr David Kelly inquest, I’ve been contacted by journalists and researchers acquainted with my side of the story. The article below is a good summary. I offer fair warning to colleagues: Dr. Kelly’s case is a fine rabbit hole to explore, but watch out for the rattlesnakes! — CPT MAY,  6/11/11







By W. Leon Smith, Iconoclast Publisher







Originally published December 10, 2009 as Captain Courageous Witnessed: Dr. Kelly Assassinated!








Dr. David Kelly, the UK scientist and war critic with connections to the BBC and the New York Times, predicted that he would be assassinated for daring to be right about the lack of Iraq WMD evidence while UK leaders chose to be wrong. His corpse, found on July 18, 2003 under mysterious circumstances, proved his prescience. At the time Tony Blair and George W. Bush were meeting in Washington to discuss their wobbly war, and to menace their critics. Coming when it did, Kelly’s murder was something right out of Macbeth or Machiavelli.







Captain Eric H. May, the U.S. journalist and war critic with connections to NBC and the New York Times, likewise predicted that he would be assassinated for speaking truth to power about the Iraq war. Ironically, May, a lifelong Texan, had contacts, even friendships, with Bush administration insiders. In 1995 The Wall Street Journal asked him to write an essay on the art of executive speech writing. A year later he was interviewing with Team Bush about becoming the then-governor’s speechwriter for the upcoming 2000 presidential campaign.





After the outbreak of the Iraq war, though, the former Army intelligence officer became an enemy of what he contemptuously called the “Bush League” when it collaborated with the mainstream media to cover up the April 5-9 Battle of Baghdad. Heavy Army and Marine losses were hidden under embellished stories about Pvt. Jessica Lynch. During this heinous act of stolen valor, the Bush administration kept a lid on things back in the U.S. by threatening and medicating the bereaved families of the fallen.





Exposing the Battle of Baghdad Cover-Up (BOBCUP) became Captain May’s crusade. He confirmed it through political, media, and military contacts. Going to Ft. Stewart, Ga., he received details of the battle, and a chilling death threat from a Special Forces officer. Col. Neil Dennington’s insinuation that dissent would be met with “special forces detachment” was an early hint of the Bush/Cheney “executive assassination” Special Forces detachments reported by New Yorker investigative journalist Seymour Hersh last year.





After the 2003 July 4th weekend, three months after BOBCUP, May sensed an anti-Bush movement in the country, especially within the armed forces, and resolved to tell the truth to the American people, damn the consequences. He knew that it would be a perilous mission. An astute political observer, he anticipated and annotated the US/UK assassinations of July 17-22, 2003. During this “July Jumble,” as it came to be called, a wide array of VIP figures would be murdered, including the UK’s David Kelly, New York City Councilman James Davis and Saddam Hussein’s sons, Uday and Qusay. George W. Bush may have been on the hit list himself, as suggested by the notorious “Shooting Bush” political cartoon published by the LA Times on July 20 — in the middle of the July Jumble.





Surprised to find himself still alive at the end of it all, May published a report that has already become an underground classic of military intelligence and principled action. The Lone Star Iconoclast is proud to vouch for the valor of its intelligence editor, Captain Eric H. May, and the validity of his historic opus, Ghost Troop Introduction. In it investigators and readers will find e-mails exposing the motives behind war and politics — as well as  cover-up and assassination. They will find the best military analyses in America, both published and unpublishable. Finally, they will find appended information proving that, if dedicated to his cause, a courageous captain may win a battle, influence a war, and even change the course of history.





Founded in 2000 to cover Crawford, Texas — home of Bush’s “Western White House” — The Lone Star Iconoclast received international acclaim as much-needed Texas truth in the post-9/11 neocon wilderness.







Addendum: Captain May’s letter to Dr. Kelly







Mrs. May didn’t take it seriously when she came home to covered windows and reinforced doors last night.  Tony Blair and George Bush were on TV, and the last thing the president had to say was that he and the prime minister would address “the issue.”  I had a feeling that I was part of that issue.  Two mentors, both WWII vets, had warned me earlier that day that I was becoming an issue affecting the president’s credibility, and had better hole up in my home for a while.





My wife is a rational woman, so she took all my paranoia with a grain of salt, until she looked up from her morning coffee and saw CNN reporting that you, a Blair Government gadfly, were dead under suspicious circumstances.  She wanted to stay home with me, but I sent her to work.  There’s no sense in putting us both at risk.  I told her to go to her parents’ house if she wanted to be safe.  She said she’d think it over, but she was in shock.  I have no idea what she’ll do.  She’ll be home this evening, if she’s coming.





So you’ll never tell anyone else that your government sexed up the evidence on weapons of mass destruction, will you?  Well, at least I’ve told what I know about the Bush Team’s cover-up of military casualties, whatever he does to me.  You became frightened and tried to recant, while I’ve been flying at them stirring up as much fuss as possible.  I hope my plan works better than yours.







I’m sorry we never had the chance to meet, because I think I would have liked you.  I believe you were a man who was interested in the truth, and it’s earned you the same wages as Socrates, Jesus, Gandhi and Martin Luther King.  You’re in good company now with them.  I’m still among the living, but I’m afraid payday is coming for me, too.





Do you know, my friend, after the police found you, it didn’t take CNN half the morning to imply that you were “under great pressure because of your testimony in Parliament.”  They hint that maybe you…, well, you know, killed yourself.  I bet you’d like to laugh at that one with me!





They just announced that you were found with a container of barbiturates by you, and say you bled to death from a slashed wrist.  That’s interesting…  An upset man might take downers to calm down, or he might kill himself instead of calming down, but why would he take downers to calm down, then still kill himself?  We both know you didn’t kill yourself, though.  They killed you.





CNN is the only sound in the house.  I’m in my library, counting on my truest friends in my crisis.  Homer and Plato, Shakespeare and Byron are there, along with a hundred others, standing guard on the shelves, each waiting to take a bullet for me.





Well, the president’s men are going to have to get messy if they want to get me, and that means blow my house up, burn it down, or machine gun it through.  All that will cause a bit of ruckus.  They’ll have to use something spectacular.  One of my oddities is that I practice tae kwon do daily, and have been doing so in the years since I left military intelligence.  This makes me difficult to deal with in close quarters.  I wonder if they know that.  If not, I’ll soon be teaching them about the five-foot staff.





I must say, it’s not really so hard to talk to a man you’ve met who has been fighting in the same Infowar.  You just dropped into my bunker beside me, and you happened to drop in dead, but we’re comrades just the same.  Welcome to the same company as Professor Guenther and Mr. Coleman, my mentors, who are also a bit shaken now.  Should I still be alive when George Bush and Tony Blair are removed from office by their legislatures, I would like to pay my respects to your family in Great Britain.  I will tell them that it came down to men like you, and them and me against men like the ones who have misled our countries.





I believe you to have behaved honorably as a man, and hope that I will acquit myself as one to the end as well.  The war is still raging, and here I sit, stoic except for the trembling of my fingers and the tears on my face.  I do not weep for myself, I weep for my country.





Permission granted to republish this column.








Les terroristes de la France-Israel censurent la nouvelle chaine de television algerienne 'Al Asr', craignant un soulevement des populations issues d'Afrique du Nord en France et la confirmation de la perte du Maghreb condamnant l'economie francaise a la faillite totale



Abu-Suleyman2:45 PMNo comments



La racaille juive sioniste Sarkozy ordonne la coupure de la nouvelle chaine algerienne 'Al Asr' car il n'a pas reussi a reunir les fonds pour 2012 et a tenté de faire signer des contrats en envoyant le preneur d'otage Raffarin, contrats destines a financer la campagne de 2012 de Sarkozy mais aussi du juif haineux sioniste algerien  Chevenement  par exemple (qui roule pour Sarkozy), ancien emir notoire des GIAs. Ceux qui en Algerie souhaitent financer un israelien le paieront et serviront d'exemple pour les autres. 





Les terroristes sionistes Claude Guéant et Guaino mettent la touche finale a des nouvelles provocations dans les banlieues. Cette fois le 'trafic de drogue' pourtant totalement aux mains des services francais en France, doit servir la cause sarkozyste pour 2012. Attaquer les 'islamistes' provoque trop de degats et affaibli le gouvernement qui voit des fonctionnaires lucides affirmer haut et fort que Sarkozy envoit la police a la guerre civile et la boucherie. Sarkozy n'a ni l'armée, ni la police, ni meme la justice derriere lui, pourquoi est-il encore a l'Elysée ? Le Pen serait-il un visionnaire ou de la partie ?  Le Pen  disait : "Vous avez vu les foules en Egypte, en Tunisie, en Syrie ? Le jour où vous avez une foule comme ça qui descendra les Champs-Elysées ! Ce n'est rien, pour eux, à la limite, d'avoir 300.000 personnes. Qui les arrêtera ? Et s'ils descendent les Champs-Elysées, ce ne sera pas pour faire joujou."  "Par exemple, ils veulent sodomiser le Président. Ils se donnent ça comme objectif : arriver jusqu'à la grille du Coq, l'enfoncer, et ensuite 'le' sabrer ? Je répète : qui les arrêtera " ... Qui sait ce qui peut arriver dans ces temps troubles de chaos organisés... 


Il va sans dire, que Sarkozy sera ejecté de l'Elysée et que les Musulmans ont les moyens de le faire avant Mai 2012, pourquoi pas le 14 Juillet 2011 ? C'est faisable, les services francais sont sur les dents nous fait-on savoir, du cinema nous vous repondons. Toutes les societes francaises qui financent Sarkozy sous la table et qui ne ne se soumettent pas aux regles minimum des droits humains et ne respectent pas les peuples Musulmans en creant et soutenant le terrorisme sous fausse banniere des GIA/GICM/AQMI comme RENAULT, TOTAL, LAFARGE, AVENTIS, AREVA, TECHNIP, AXA etc... pas ne pourront jamais operer dans des pays Musulmans. Sarkozy n'est qu'un pantin, il ne faudrait pas qu'il soit la cause de vos mises en faillites. Choisissez, le respect des peuples et des droits ou la soumission a Israel.... Sans argent Sarkozy n'aura d'autres choix que de faire sauter ses bombes sales, des centrales nucleaires ou tenter de declencher des emeutes dans les banlieues ou jouant sur 'la guerre des gangs' ou la drogue venant d'Afghanistan et du Maghreb ecoulée par l'OTAN et les armées occidentales corrompues ainsi que les reseaux juifs sionistes francais de la DST-DCRI en Afrique, Maghreb, Corse vers les banlieues européenes servira d'excuse, a defaut de 'l'islamisme'. Sarkozy, c'est fini et ce sont les Musulmans qui le disent et le font !!! Si ca pose un probleme, nous attendons avec impatience votre guerre civile, Guaino, Gueant, Squarcini.... Mais vos CV demontrent que vous n'etes que des pleutres et des petits collabos israeliens.... Lancez vos milices dans les rues si vous etes des hommes ! Sinon restez cachés derriere vos bureaux et fermez la une bonne fois pour toute !


AS

Message de censure du gouvernement d'occupation israelien de France sur le site de la chaine 'Al Asr' http://www.alasr.tv/




نخبر مشاهدي قناتنا أن الشركة الفرنسية "اتلسات" قطعت البث التجريبي لقناتنا والراجح أن هذا القرار اتخذ نتيجة لضغط من دولة أو دول عربية. وستلجأ قناة العصر إلى كل الوسائل القانونية لاسترجاع حقها في الإعلام الحر ووضع حد لهذا الانتهاك الخطير لحرية التعبير.





We inform our respected viewers that the French company Eutelsat has  stopped the broadcast of our channel on the Atlantic Bird satellite. This decision seems to have been taken following pressures exerted upon Eutelsat by one or more Arab governments. ALASR will use all legal means to recover its right to inform and put an end to this breach of the right to freedom of expression. 





Nous informons nos téléspectateurs et téléspectatrices que la société française Eutelsat a arrête la diffusion de notre chaîne. Cette décision ferait suite à des pressions éxercées par un ou plusieurs gouvernements arabes sur Eutelsat. ALASR entend user de toutes les voix légales pour recouvrer son droit à informer et mettre fin à cette grave atteinte à la liberté d'expression.


Communiqué: Le Mouvement Rachad condamne l’arrêt de la diffusion de la chaine « Rachad TV » 







« Rachad TV » s’est jointe à plusieurs autres télévisions liées à des ONG des droits de l’homme et d’autres organisations de la société civile dans le monde arabe pour fonder « Canal Alasr », un canal satellitaire qui se veut une tribune ouverte à toutes les voix libres, notamment celles qui souffrent de censure et d’exclusion, et un lien entre toutes les composantes de la société civile et les défenseurs des droits de l’homme qui œuvrent pour opérer un changement politique et lancer une transition démocratique non-violente dans le monde arabe et particulièrement en Algérie. 



« Rachad TV » devait commencer sa diffusion, par l’intermédiaire du satellite « Atlantic Bird 4 », hier le 11 juin 2011 à 20 h, heure d'Alger. Mais quelques heures avant le lancement de « Rachad TV », la société française « Eutelsat », propriétaire du satellite « Atlantic Bird 4 » et d’autres satellites comme « Hot Bird », a décidé de couper le signal de « Canal Alasr ».



Les premières informations en notre possession indiquent que cette décision est le résultat d’une pression et de chantage exercés sur la société « Eutelsat » de la part de plusieurs parties, principalement par le pouvoir algérien.



Le Mouvement Rachad condamne cette pratique despotique du pouvoir algérien au moment où les vents de liberté dans le monde arabe balaient la culture politique de la pensée unique, et alors que ce pouvoir se vante de lancer des consultations sur la réforme en Algérie.



Le Mouvement Rachad considère ces méthodes d’un autre âge de se comporter avec les médias libres une preuve supplémentaire de la volonté du pouvoir algérien d’étouffer toutes les voix, à l’intérieur et à l’extérieur, qui appellent au changement, à la justice et à la liberté, ainsi qu’un aveu clair de ce pouvoir qu’il ne pourrait supporter la lumière de l’information indépendante des officines obscures du DRS. Ceci constitue en soi une défaite morale cuisante pour ces officines et leur façade politique.



Après des consultations avec ses partenaires à « Canal Alasr », « Rachad TV » a décidé d’user de tous les moyens légaux pour garantir l’exercice de son droit à informer. Elle soumettra notamment une plainte aux mécanismes onusiens des droits de l’homme, et en particulier au Rapporteur spécial pour la liberté d’expression, ainsi qu’à toute autre organisation ou institution qui défend les médias libres.



« Rachad TV » réitère son engagement à porter sa voix et celle des hommes et des femmes libres dans le monde arabe et en Algérie ; les pratiques obscurantistes du pouvoir algérien ne font que renforcer sa volonté pour aller de l’avant dans sa mission.
Secrétariat du Mouvement Rachad
12 juin 2011

http://rachad.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=708:communique-le-mouvement-rachad-condamne-larret-de-la-diffusion-de-la-chaine-l-rachad-tv-r&catid=68:editoriauxfr&Itemid=99




Explication sur la censure de la nouvelle chaine algerienne 'Al Asr' par l'engeance talmudique arrierée de la France-Israel a l'Elysée et a Alger.



Abu-Suleyman4:59 AMNo comments


Video : Explication du Dr Mourad Dhina sur la censure de la nouvelle chaine Algerienne par les sefarades sionistes algeriens des deux bords de la Mediterannée. (Sefarades racistes talmudo-sionistes et autres pieds noirs corses au controle du DRS et de la DCRI, fondateurs du GIA et d'AQMI).

Voir liens :
http://rachad.org/
http://www.alasr.tv/





Mossadnik Captured in Egypt Involved in Pipeline Blast - Video



Abu-Suleyman9:03 AMNo comments



 By Kawther Salam,

http://www.kawther.info/wpr/





The Egyptian authorities and the state news agency revealed on Sunday June 12  

2011 that they have arrested Ilan Chaim Grappelli/Grapel, (אילן גרפל ), known in Israel as Ilan Goren (אילן גורן), an American-Israeli Mossad agent, a war criminal who participated in the atrocities of the Lebanon “second war” in 2006, and a former paratrooper soldier who had infiltrated the Egyptian revolutionists and was causing trouble, spying on the military and the revolutionaries, photographing people and reporting to the Mossad, distributing money to some Egyptians and recruiting them in order to cause chaos, to steal and to sabotage public infrastructure in the country. Grappelli had also been organizing a series of protest movements and preparing them to disobey orders of the military authorities after the overthrow of  President Hosni Mubarak. (Click on the picture to make it bigger).







According to Egyptian authorities, judge Hesham Badawi of the supreme state security prosecution ordered the detention of the israeli spy for 15 days for pending investigations into his alleged spying on Egypt with the aim of sabotaging and harming its economic and political interests. The israeli mossad spy was arrested at a famous hotel in Cairo with a laptop and three mobile phones.



According to the Egyptian intelligence services, Grappelli, the Mossad officer  

appeared in Egypt shortly before the start of the January 25 uprising, he entered the country with forged Visa and he was among the first elements that existed in Tahrir Square, and he was photographed and his movements followed closely after he had raised suspicions. He visited several regions in Egypt, including North of Sinai, He monitored gas pipelines, the relationship between the Egyptians and the Palestinians. The spy introduced himself to the resistance at Al-Tahrir Square as a “foreign correspondent” supposedly covering the anti-government protests in Cairo. The movements and phone calls of the spy were monitored and filmed in Egypt before his arrest.





Several images of the spy were released by the Egyptian authorities, showing that he had appeared in various places throughout Egypt. In some images is seen raising signs among the demonstrators, in another one he appears at the jewish synagogue, and in others he is seen around areas affected by violence and troubles.



The Egyptian intelligence service was able to track the messages and contacts of  

the mossad agent with the Israeli government and to some western countries and the USA. The monitoring process confirmed the suspicions about the seditious role which the spy and his backers played in creating chaos in Egypt in an attempt at pre-empting the revolution of the twenty-fifth of January, by way of fomenting sectarian violence between the Egyptians. Information gathered by the Egyptian intelligence service confirmed that the Israeli spy belonged to the Israeli military and that he had been injured during the Lebanon war of 2006.





According to intelligence sources, Goren/Grapel/Grappelli had participated in the perpetration heinous massacres, war crimes against Lebanese villagers in southern Lebanon. They also published some of his pictures with military uniform during the second Lebanon war.



 

The mossad spy admitted that he was assigned to a variety of roles in Egypt in order to generate trouble in Egypt and that he had paid money to some elements in Egypt so that they would assist him in the implementation of the plan, which was about causing strife and chaos in the country and repeating rumors that would prevent the stabilization of the situation in Egypt. He also admitted that he had paid some elements for the dissemination of rumors and for exploding the pipeline which provides israel and Jordan with Gas. ‬





The Egyptian sources pointed out that the confessions of the mossadnik will reveal amazing facts about some of the horrible incidents which took place during the last months, especially during the outbreak of the people’s revolution and liberation of Egypt.





See the video below about Grapel’s / Goren’s mission to Egypt.

















 

It should be noted that previously three alleged Mossad espionage cells were dismantled in Lebanon and Syria and that Israel has a history of implanting mossad cells all over western and Arab countries and that there are no doubts that the mossad is behind many horrible crimes such as assassinations of politicians, theft, smuggling of drugs, jewelry, diamonds, weapons, organ trafficking etc., all perpetrated for the advantage of israel and other zionist interests. Simply said, Israel is a big threat for security of all peoples and countries of the world.





The US State Department issued a statement on Sunday reacting to Grapeli’s detention, saying that their Embassy in Cairo “is providing Grapel with the necessary help which provided to all US citizens arrested overseas”. The statement pointed that consular officers visited Gabrel and that the embassy will be in contact with the Egyptian authorities to ensure that he is “being treated fairly under local law”.
http://www.kawther.info/wpr/2011/06/13/mossadnik-captured-in-egypt-involved-in-pipeline-blast-video




Hasbara Galore: Israel-Iran Trade and the Ofer Brothers Part-2



Abu-Suleyman9:11 AMNo comments


By Jonathan Azaziah,
www.maskofzion.com

Read part 1 here




The story surfaced and immediately sent ripples throughout the globe. The United States announced new sanctions against seven companies for business transactions processed with the Islamic Republic of Iran. One firm from Monaco, one from Venezuela (a ‘hostile environment’ as far as the US-Israel nexus is concerned), another from Singapore, another from the UAE, two connected to Iran itself and one… from the Zionist entity (23). The idea that an Israeli company was doing business with its bitter, despised enemy, Iran, was a hard enough pill to swallow. But this was no ordinary firm. This firm was owned by the Ofer Brothers Group, as in the brotherly duo of Sammy and Yuli Ofer, reportedly known to be the Zionist entity’s wealthiest men (24). This added another layer of strange to the story.







The snake of hasbara reared its ugly head in the blink of an eye, and a torrential downpour of bizarre ‘breaking news’ was at every corner of the Zionist entity’s newspapers. The reports started coming in at lightning speed, and what started as ‘Ofergate’ evolved into a mutated media monster about actual trade relations between Iran and Tel Aviv: 



13 ships owned by the Ofer Brothers had docked in the Islamic Republic over the course of a decade, and a relationship was established with the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (25), 200 Zionist companies had financial links to the Islamic Revolution’s energy sector (26), hundreds of Israeli firms (and American firms also) conducting business with Iran via sub-companies (27), and the most outlandish of all, that Iran trades marble, cashews and pistachios with the Zionist entity for Israeli organic fertilizers, pierced irrigation pipes, hormone-boosting milk products and seeds and that an Iranian Agriculture Ministry official traveled to Tel Aviv to thank it for the business (28). Outrageous. Undeniably outrageous.





The origins of this hasbara will be dealt with in a moment. The first question is, why would the American government, which is dominated and controlled by Zionists of every known type, from WINEP to AIPAC, ZOA to AJC, Brookings to CFR, release information about an Israeli company doing business with Iran?



The first answer is simple. The American government wouldn’t unless it was told to do so by its Zionist puppetmasters. The second question is in two parts: why would the Zionist Power Configuration want such information released? And, wouldn’t this information be excruciatingly damaging to the usurping regime’s efforts to force military action against Iran? The answer to the second part is also a simple one: no, absolutely not, because it is an indisputable fact that Zionists control the media and a scandal of this magnitude can be buried just as quickly as it is ‘excavated.’ Additionally, Zionism’s subversive activities against the Islamic Revolution haven’t been deterred by this story in the slightest, nor has its power over Western governments been diminished. The answer to the first part has been summed up perfectly and succinctly by Chairman of Iran's Chamber of Commerce, Industries and Mines (ICCIM), Mohammad Nahavandian:





“News about activities of Zionist firms in Iran is a new game started in reaction to the willingness of certain countries to establish economic ties with Iran. Several countries have expressed their willingness to increase economic interactions with Iran following the global economic crisis. They cannot deprive themselves from the growing economy in Iran. In addition to a legal ban, Iran regards Zionist firms and their policy makers as the main factors behind economic sanctions against the Islamic Republic and refrains from making any deal with them (29).”





It is no secret that Iran has taken a proactive approach in the MENA region and established solid financial and diplomatic ties with the majority of the MENA nations, including those experiencing upheaval. The Islamic Revolution is treading in territory that the Zionist entity allows nothing and noone to tread in: the global commerce system. MENA, where Iran, an Islamic regional power, has a vested interest in, is being prepped for destablization and mass neoliberalism via the ultra-powerful supranational financial institutions known as the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development {EBRD} and the European Investment Bank {EIB} (30). To keep Iran far away from its EBRD and EIB projects, Zionism released these allegations through its media to once again drive daggers into Iran’s reputation.?







As was the case with the venomous Iran-Israel weapons deal propaganda during the Iran-Iraq war, only with more prevalence here, all sources for ‘Ofergate’ originate from the Zionist entity: Yossi Melman, well-known columnist for Haaretz with abyssal ties to Shin Bet, IOF, Mossad and Aman; Tel Aviv University and Haifa University, both schools are entrenched in Israel’s military society, with each of them graduating their fair share of Knesset members, Prime Ministers, Mossad officials and IOF officers; and the Israeli-Arab Friendship Association, a capitalist, neoliberal think tank-type organization that whitewashes occupation and Palestinian suffering in the pursuit of profit. Liars, propagandists, exploiters, hasbara fellows, warmongers and more liars. It is also of grave importance to note that the Israeli government and Shin Bet rule the media sphere with an iron fist, issuing gag orders on ‘national security’ matters and revoking publishing licenses when need be (31). If the Zionist leadership didn’t want the aforementioned band of liars to publish this information, it wouldn’t have been published. Period.      

    



While it is clear that the media’s coverage of ‘Ofergate’ is a hasbara operation of the highest degree, part of a greater demonization and isolation agenda that Israel and its Western stooges have pursued against Iran since the victory of the Islamic Revolution, there is still another aspect to it; a darker aspect. An intelligence aspect. An aspect highly worthy of comment due to the implications it has for the future of Iran.
To be continued…..

Sources:

(23) Seven Companies Sanctioned Under the Amended Iran Sanctions Act by Office of the Spokesman, US Department of State
(24) Israeli Ofer Brothers Deny Allegation They Sold Ship To Iran by Yossi Melman, Haaretz
(25) 13 Ships Owned By Israel's Ofer Brothers Have Docked In Iran Over Past Decade by Dafna Maor, Ora Coren and Yossi Melman, Haaretz
(26) Report: 200 Israeli Companies Have Ties With Iranian Energy Sector by Saed Bannoura, IMEMC
(27) Suspected Israeli-Iranian Business Dealings Raise Questions by Adam Gonn, Xinhua
(28) Israel-Iran Trade Ties Thriving by Ofer Petersburg, Ynet
(29) ‘Iran Has No Trade With Zionist Firms’ by Press TV
(30) Kiss Egypt’s Revolution Goodbye by Richard Eastman, 21st Century Wire
(31) Israel, Extraordinary Rendition And The Strange Case Of Dirar Abu Sisi by Richard Silverstein, Truth Out

http://www.opinion-maker.org/2011/06/hasbara-galore-israel-iran-trade-and-the-ofer-brothers-part-2/




Interview du Dr Kevin Barrett en francais. Le terrorisme sous fausse banniere un sujet essentiel ceux qui souhaitent l'interviewer peuvent le contacter sur son blog TruthJihad, on essaiera de lui donner la chance de pouvoir parler a Paris sur le theme du terrorisme insha Allah



Abu-Suleyman1:28 PMNo comments



By Kevin Barrett,

www.truthjihad.blogspot.com

 

My 9/11 truth interview (in French) on Belgian university radio




I just did a lively interview, en français, with Frédéric of Campus Radio Bruxelles.

Listen here.

I'm not sure how long they'll be archiving it, so listen quickly!

Also, just a reminder about tonight's talk (more details at Vigli.org)




Conférence du Prof. Kevin Barrett à Bruxelles : Me 15 juin à 20h

au Cercle littéraire Victor Hugo
106 Av Stalingrad. 1000 Bruxelles
(près de la Gare du Midi)

« Comment se réconcilier avec les médias et les politiciens qui nous ont menti pendant 10 ans à propos du 11 septembre 2001 »Les portes ouvrent à 19h30






INTRODUCTION: 2011 Summer False Flag Forecast



Abu-Suleyman1:40 PMNo comments


By Abu Salem Sofyan, Islamic Intelligence

& Captain Eric H. May, Iconoclast Intelligence





Holy Horde: International Interfaith



6/17/11 — We two editors could not be more different at first glance, but appearances can be deceiving. A Muslim Arab European and a Christian Anglo American, we began with mutual suspicion. Since then we have corresponded, found common ground and become both coauthors and friends. Surely this is an example of what will make a better world.

In the next week we shall examine the false flag top targets and timetables for six countries that we consider most endangered:



United States
United Kingdom
France
Germany
Spain
Italy

We know of no similar US/EU joint analysis, and hope that our example, endorsed by our colleagues and readers, will encourage similar efforts.






False Flag: “Existential Essential“


The ongoing US/EU campaign against Libya is increasingly unpopular, and U.S. public support for the war is nosediving:




Just 26% Favor Continued Military Action in Libya
Monday, June 13, 2011 — A plurality of voters now opposes further U.S. military action in Libya, and most say President Obama needs congressional approval to continue those operations. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 26% of Likely U.S. Voters feel the United States should continue its military actions in Libya. Forty-two percent (42%) are opposed  and 32% are undecided. But 59% agree the president should get the approval of Congress if he wants to continue U.S. military action in Libya. Twenty-one percent (21%) say congressional approval is not needed. Another 20% are not sure.
Meanwhile, Congressional opposition to the war is skyrocketing:




Lawmakers mock Obama claim on Libya hostilities
Republicans and Democrats on Thursday derided President Barack Obama’s claim that U.S. air attacks against Libya do not constitute hostilities and demanded that the commander in chief seek congressional approval for the 3-month-old military operation. In an escalating constitutional fight, House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner, a Republican, threatened to withhold money for the mission, pitting a Congress eager to exercise its power of the purse against a dug-in White House.
The political basis for the Libya War is flimsy in Europe, too, and it seems incredible that the Zionist US/EU media is agitating for yet another war, this time against Syria (leading to war with Iran). There isn’t a snowball’s chance in Haiti that the various publics will commit more blood and treasure for oil and Israel — unless of course there’s another 9/11 to stimulate war fever in the war-weary West.
Our US/EU summer false flag focus is based on four premises:



9/11 and the post-9/11 crusade against Islamic nations were crimes plotted and perpetrated by what Colonel Larry Wilkerson, chief of staff to former U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell, famously called “a secretive Cabal running American foreign policy, which is undermining American democracy.”
The West, led by a diminishing United States, is engaged in a struggle against the East, led by an emerging China, to control Mideast oil, according to former NATO commander General Wesley Clark in a CNN interview three months after the invasion of Iraq.
The 9/11 Cabal war plan, demanding public acceptance of imperial invasions and domestic despotism, is increasingly challenged by the internet, which circumvents and contradicts the Zionist mainstream media.
Time is running out for the 9/11 Cabal because of the possible recognition of an independent Palestinian state in the September United Nations General Assembly, making a false flag an “existentialist essential” for Zionist Zealots.



Holy Quran, Chapter 43, Verse 61:


“And Jesus shall be a Sign for the coming of the Hour of Judgment, therefore have no doubt about the Hour, but follow ye Me: this is a Straight Way.”



« Révolutions Arabes » : Mystique de l’Histoire ?



Abu-Suleyman1:45 PMNo comments



Par Omar Mazri,

http://www.liberation-opprimes.net/





Edition & Conseil - Marseille Juin 2011



{Si Allah vous Fait triompher, nul ne pourra vous vaincre. Et s’Il vous Abandonne, qui d’autre que Lui pourra vous faire triompher ? Que les croyants se fient à Allah.} Al 'Imràne 160
Auteur de :

La République et le Voile: Symboles et Inversions
Gaza : La Bataille du Forqane
Aimer : la Voie coranique




Omar Mazri, nous livre dans le présent ouvrage une lecture des Révolutions arabes sous l’angle mystique. C’est une approche mystique de l’histoire écrite par le sang arabe. 





Ce « phénomène » révolutionnaire relevant du mystère a mis en marche une détermination des peuples Tunisiens et Égyptiens inattendue et inespérée. Au-delà de l’imaginable les Arabes issues de toutes les couches populaires ont unis leurs efforts et conservé leur unité d’action en bravant la répression et le meurtre pour faire tomber les régimes militaires et policiers comme des châteaux de cartes. C’est un événement majeur qui dépasse l’entendement puisqu’il a surpris le monde occidental dominant qui a vu ses pions tomber sans pouvoir intervenir pour les maintenir.

Lire la suite

http://www.liberation-opprimes.net/



--

"Allah! Donne-nous le courage de changer ce qui peut être changé, la sérénité d'accepter ce qui ne peut pas l'être et la sagesse pour distinguer l'un de l'autre".سيبلغ هذا الأمر – أي الإسلام - ما بلغ الليل والنهار





من اعان ظالما ولو بشطر كلمه ياتي يوم القيامة مكتوب على جبينه ايس من رحمة الله



London is turning into Israel’s laboratory in preparation for 2012 summer Olympics



Abu-Suleyman10:18 AMNo comments




The current issue of muckraking journal Private Eye reports that Heathrow Airport will have shiny new equipment for screening passengers installed with the help of several Israeli firms as part of preparations for next year’s Olympic Games. The sporting event affords an opportunity to run a “live test” on the Total Airport Security System (TASS), a 14.5 million euro ($21 million) project mainly financed by the European Union.

As it happens, details of the project were announced almost exactly a year ago. In a June 2010 statement, the consortium behind TASS bragged that it had won formal EU authorisation for the scheme, which uses “real-time sensors” and various other tools to monitor aircraft, people, cargo, and restaurant areas in an airport separately and then blend all the resulting data in a “multisource labyrinth”.

The project is being coordinated by Verint, an Israeli supplier of surveillance equipment (or “actionable intelligence solutions”,according to its own bumph). Another participant in the consortium is Elbit, which made many of the pilotless drones that Israel used to devastate Gaza during 2008 and 2009. Elbit also helped install an electronic spying system into the annexation wall that Israel is building in the West Bank (illegally, according to a 2004 ruling of the International Court of Justice).




This is by no means the first indication that Israel’s shoot-first-ask-questions-later approach to security has caught on in London. Metropolitan cops who killed an innocent Brazilian man Jean-Charles de Menezes in 2005 had received specialist training in Israel. One year earlier, the aforementioned Verint won a contract to provide a video system to keep a watchful eye on users of the London Underground. Verint has also been tasked with putting a newclosed circuit TV network into Earl’s Court – a world-famous venue for exhibitions and events – ahead of the Olympics.

The Palestinian organisation Stop the Wall, meanwhile, has complained this week about how EU officials appear determined to keep on subsidising Israel’s war industry.

The Union’s executive arm, the European Commission, has recently invited comments on the future of its science policy, as part of a “public consultation exercise” about what priorities it should follow after 2014, when its current multi-annual programme for research expires. Israel is the most active non-European participant in that programme. And while the Commission received numerous pleas to declare Israeli firms such as Verint and Elbit ineligible for further grants, it has omitted any reference to them in the 24-page summary that it compiled of public responses.

Jamal Juma’a, coordinator with Stop the Wall, described the omission as “deeply disappointing”. He said: “By providing research funding to companies involved in constructing and maintaining Israel’s apartheid wall, the EU is undermining its own stated commitment to international law and a just peace between Israel and the Palestinian people.”

Informed citizens in the US have long been aware that Israel’s military machine is oiled with dollars. It is clear now that the same machine is oiled with euros, too, and that the Brussels bureaucracy is refusing to even acknowledge that this state of affairs is legally and ethically problematic, to say the very least.

David Cronin’s book Europe’s Alliance With Israel: Aiding the Occupation is published by Pluto Press.




 http://mondoweiss.net/2011/06/london-is-turning-into-israel%E2%80%99s-labortory-in-preparation-for-2012-summer-olympics.html




North African Experts Fear Israeli Design to Balkanise Arab States (Tunisia/Libya, Egypt, Algeria)



Abu-Suleyman5:01 AMNo comments


Analysis by Adam Morrow and Khaled Moussa al-Omrani,






CAIRO, Jun 18, 2011 - Developments in Libya have raised fears among Egyptian analysts and political figures of the possible break-up of the North African nation into two warring halves. To support the assertion, they point to longstanding Israeli designs - supported by the western powers - to balkanise the Arab states of the region.

"Libya could be split in two, with Gaddafi staying on in the west of the country and a revolutionary government loyal to the western powers in control of the east," Mohamed al-Sakhawi, leading member of Egypt's as-yet-unlicensed Arabic Unity Party, told IPS.

For three months, Libya has suffered internationally sanctioned air-strikes by the western NATO alliance, launched with the stated aim of supporting the ongoing popular uprising against the Gaddafi regime. Revolutionary forces based in Ben Ghazi now hold most of the country's eastern half, while forces loyal to Gaddafi continue to control the country's western half from the capital Tripoli.

Yet the fact that NATO - despite its overwhelming air superiority - has so far failed to dislodge the Gaddafi regime has led many local observers to question the western alliance's intentions.

"The western campaign against Libya wasn't undertaken to protect human rights or foster democracy," said al-Sakhawi. "It was launched with the aim of breaking Libya up politically so as to prevent the unification of three revolutionary Arab states - Egypt, Libya and Tunisia - which together might pose a threat to Israeli regional dominance."

Walid Hassan, international law professor at Alexandria's Pharos University, agreed for the most part, saying that NATO - with Israeli encouragement - "hopes to replace Gaddafi with rulers loyal to the west in advance of breaking the country into small statelets, as they are doing in Iraq.

"The primary objective is to weaken the Arab states of North Africa, which, if they ever united, would represent a potential threat to Israeli and western interests," Hassan told IPS. "Libya's significant oil wealth, of course, constitutes a secondary reason for the intervention."

Al-Sakhawi pointed to the region's century-old legacy of balkanisation at the hands of foreign powers.

"The 1916 Sykes-Picot agreement between Britain and France drew artificial borders across the region and fragmented the Arab world into nation states," he said. "And in recent years, the drive to further balkanise the Arab world - by Israel and the western powers - has only accelerated."

Egyptian analysts point to several proposals written to this effect by Israeli strategists, the most well known of which is a 1982 treatise entitled "A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s." Written by Oded Yinon, then a senior advisor for Israel's foreign ministry, the essay explicitly calls for breaking up the Arab states of the region along ethnic and sectarian lines.

"The Zionist plan to politically fragment the Arab Middle East so as to keep Arab states in a perpetual state of instability and weakness has been well known for the last three decades," Gamal Mazloum, retired Egyptian major-general and expert on defence issues, told IPS.

While the Yinon document does not devote much space to Libya, it talks in detail about the need to divide Iraq, Egypt, Syria and Lebanon into small, ineffectual statelets.

"The dissolution of Syria and Iraq later on into ethnically or religiously unique areas… is Israel's primary target on the eastern front in the long run," the author writes. For Yinon, oil-rich and ethnically-diverse Iraq - which he describes as "the greatest threat to Israel" - constitutes a chief target.

"In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines… is possible," he writes. "So, three states will exist around the three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and Shiite areas in the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north."

As for Egypt, Yinon calls for breaking the country up into "distinct geographical regions." The establishment of an independent Coptic-Christian state in Upper Egypt, he writes, "alongside a number of weak states with very localised power and without a centralised government…seems inevitable in the long run."

Yinon goes on to mention Sudan in similar terms, describing it as "the most torn-apart state in the Arab-Muslim world today…built upon four groups hostile to each other: an Arab-Muslim Sunni minority which rules over a majority of non-Arab Africans, pagans and Christians."

According to Mazloum, political manoeuvring in recent years by Israel and the western powers - both overt and covert - appears to conform to this strategy of balkanisation.

"Israel and the U.S. have both helped break up Iraq by encouraging the emergence of an independent Kurdish state and fostering Sunni-Shiite division," he said. "And in Sudan, Israel actively contributed to the war between north and south by providing the latter with weapons and military training."

Southern Sudan is set to declare independence from the northern Khartoum government next month in a move that will officially split Africa's largest country in two.

"Israel has an interest in breaking up Sudan and instigating sectarian strife in Egypt so that the latter is faced with crises on both its internal and external fronts," said Mazloum. "Israel and its western patrons are determined to keep Egypt - the most populous Arab nation by far - in a state of perpetual weakness so that it cannot aid the Arab cause in places like Palestine and Iraq."

Earlier this month, Mohamed Abbas, a leading member of Egypt's Revolutionary Coalition Council (RCC), likewise warned of an ongoing "conspiracy" aimed at breaking Egypt into three petty states. The RCC consists of several political movements that played prominent roles in Egypt's recent Tahrir Uprising.

"This conspiracy is part of a wider scheme to fragment the Arab states - as has happened in Sudan, is happening in Libya and has been attempted in Iraq - in order to render Egypt so weak that the Zionist entity will be sure to remain the dominant power in the new Middle East," Abbas was quoted as saying by independent daily Al-Shorouk on Jun. 4.
http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=56140




United States False Flag Forecast, Summer 2011



Abu-Suleyman1:53 PMNo comments


By Captain Eric H. May, Iconoclast Intelligence and Abu Salem sofyan, Islamic Intelligence
 




SUNDAY, 6/19/11 — The New American Century, with its radioactive warfare, genocide and unnatural disasters, is killing as many people as the Thousand Year Reich, with which it shares many characteristics.





In both cases law-abiding citizens of the aggressor nations were told that they were facing an insidious international Semitic foe who danced in celebration when he terrorized nations or started wars. This is what the Germans said about the Jews in the Thousand Year Reich. It is what the Jews say about the Arabs in the New American Century. It’s what the Arabs say about the Jews in Occupied Palestine, adding that the Jews are the new Nazis.







Yesterday we published the introduction of our 2011 Summer False Flag Forecast, a short explanation of what we are writing and why we are writing it. Within hours Islamic Intelligence came under cyberattack. Our mission is serious, as our enemies have learned, not erroneous, as our friends have been told by our enemies. It is neither easy nor safe, so we strengthen ourselves with the belief that we please God by fighting devils like the terrorist tyrants and merchants of menace who run the Global War.





Both of us have lived in various levels of the underground, from using noms de guerre to going into hiding. We both know agents and agencies that don’t like us and our work. In their bizarre reality, our efforts to alert the internet in order to avert a false flag attack constitutes a threat to national security. We’re far down the road to being labeled terrorist alarmists, it we’re not there already.






Three Top Targets




The Al Qaeda scarecrow got a new face Thursday, with bin Laden lieutenant Zawahiri reported as the new leader. The media programming of 9/11/2B, the next 9/11, intensified. Al-Qaeda’s new leader could launch ‘big’ attack on the West:





Ayman al-Zawahiri, Al-Qaeda’s new leader, could launch a “big” attack on the West as he tries to stamp his authority on the embattled movement, according to counter-terrorism experts: “He will focus on attacking the West in a big way, to avenge bin Laden’s death, but also to make himself even more effective and relevant.”





This ominous story line has been under development since the Chicago FBI announced in late March that it had received nuclear terror threats. After the reported bin Laden death the nuclear menace was renewed with reports that Al Qaeda was planning a nuclear revenge attack.





In the background many federal agencies and military units are rehearsing weapons of mass destruction attacks, including mass casualties, mass deaths and mass burials. In mid-May it was National Level Exercise 2011 (NLE 11); in early June it was Red Dragon; last week it was Point Defender; and this week it will be Eagle Horizon, in which thousands of emergency officials will react to a simulated U.S. nuclear terror attack.





The U.S. is at high risk of a nuclear false flag attack this summer, and the most likely targets are those which have been set up for attacks in the past. For quick reference, we offer the imperiled public a list of times and places when and where there have been false flag attacks or attempts. Each item is well documented by mainstream and alternative media, and in every case an ad hoc internet coalition mounted a public affairs campaign to counter the threat. Detection is the best protection.


United States False Flag Attacks and Attempts
(in reverse chronological order)


6/3/11 – 6/11/11: Chicago Red Dragon false flag attempt
11/26/10, Portland, OR, “Tree Bomber” false flag attempt
11/6/10 – 11/10/10:  USA, Biden/Netanyahu nuclear reactors false flag attempt
7/31/09 – 8/14/09: Ft Leavenworth false flag attempt on Kansas City
7/30/09: Bryan, TX, El Dorado Chemical fire — (1) alert (2) analysis
2 /16/09 – 2/17/09, Chicago, IL, Stimulus Bill false flag attempt
10/18/07 – 10/19/07: Portland, OR, TOPOFF-4 false flag attempt
10/18/07: Port Arthur, TX, Dow Chemical explosion
7/19/06: Beirut, Israeli false flag attempt on the Orient Queen
7/2/06: Baytown, TX, Exxon Mobil refinery explosion — the alert
5/3/06: Sears Tower, Chicago, IL,  false flag attempt
2/1/06, Morganton, NC, Synthron Chemical explosion
1/31/06: Texas City, TX, BP refinery false flag attempt
7/28/05: Texas City, TX, BP refinery explosion
9/26/04: New Caney, TX, pipeline explosion – the alert
4/19/04: Sears Tower, Chicago, IL, false flag attempt
3/30/04: Texas City, TX, BP refinery explosion


In conclusion, the three most likely U.S. targets this summer are CHICAGO, HOUSTON and PORTLAND, the same three detailed in the prototype of this article, False Flag Prospects, 2008 — Top Three US Target Cities.


Recommended Resources:



2011 false flag analysis: Captain May Veterans Today Archive
2004 – 2011 false flag analysis: Captain May America First Books Archive
Post-9/11 false flag history, Mission of Conscience, by Major William B. Fox



Ephesians, Chapter 6, Verse 12



“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.”

+ + +



This article is dedicated to my father, Harry H. May, who is hospitalized while recovering from surgery.
Happy Father’s Day, Daddio!








Entrapping Innocent Muslims



Abu-Suleyman3:12 AMNo comments





 By Stephen Lendman





A recent New York University School of Law Center for Human Rights and Global Justice (CHRGJ) report is titled, “Targeted and Entrapped: Manufacturing the ‘Homegrown Threat’ in the United States.”





Post-9/11, Muslims have been ruthlessly targeted. Paid informants have infested mosques and their communities to entrap them. As a result, over 200 were persecuted on bogus terrorism related charges. Despite “tout(ing) these cases as successes in the so-called war against terrorism….former (FBI) agents, local lawmakers,” and many others “have begun questioning the legitimacy and efficacy” of entrapping innocent victims for political advantage.





CHRGJ discussed several high-profile cases, using well-paid informants often performing services in return for reduced charges or sentences they face, a powerful incentive to cooperate.







Nearly always, Washington invents plots foiled in the nick of time, entrapping innocent victims with no intent to commit crimes. America’s media headline them. The public feels safer with no idea they’ve been scammed or that blameless citizens and residents are falsely charged.





In fact, calling Muslims “potential threats” or “homegrown terrorists” violates core constitutional freedoms. Nonetheless, it’s now common law enforcement practice assuming that:



– Muslims are more likely to become terrorists;
– they’re increasingly “radicalized” and compelled to commit violence in the name of Islam; and
– counterterrorism policies should identify and stop them before they act.




In fact, research contradicts these notions. Moreover, relying on them violates fundamental human rights long ago discarded for political and judicial expediency. As a result, Muslims most often face terrorism charges because “they hate us” or other spurious reasons.





Muslim men (and “Muslim looking people) are especially vulnerable. In addition, Muslim culture and religious practices are also cited as indicators of potential terrorism. As a result, they’re maliciously targeted, surveilled, investigated, entrapped, charged, unjustly prosecuted, and convicted.





Notably, a 2007 NYPD report titled, “Radicalization in the West: The Homegrown Threat” popularized these beliefs, using “thinly sourced, reductionist” notions, claiming:





“the path to terrorism has a fixed trajectory and that each step of the process has specific, identifiable markers,” despite no corroborating evidence. In fact, research suggests the opposite, exposing racist, discriminatory beliefs and practices.





In fact, Washington uses these notions maliciously, targeting innocent Muslims for their faith and ethnicity. Moreover, in February, Senator Joe Lieberman called on the National and Homeland Security Councils to develop “a comprehensive national approach to countering homegrown radicalization to violent Islamist extremism.





In March, Rep. Peter King chaired a racist congressional hearing, duplicitously claiming radicalized Muslims are increasing at an alarming rate, endangering US security. In fact, the only law enforcement witness testifying refuted his accusations.





Most alarming is that Obama’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS), FBI, and Justice Department (DOJ) all embrace racist radicalization notions to entrap innocent victims with “preventive” policing nearly always with no evidence of wrongdoing. Instead of pursuing criminals, they target people for their faith, religious practices, and appearance unjustly, using well-paid informant snitches.





Post-9/11, repressive laws were enacted to facilitate the process, “resulting in the criminalization of a range of behaviors (not) indicative of….intent to commit…violent crime(s).” At the same time, law enforcement powers were recklessly expanded in violation of constitutional rights. As a result, abusive practices proliferated against Muslims, making it the wrong time for them to be here, even native born ones .



Using informants to illegally entrap is especially alarming when no legal limits constrain the targeting of one segment of society. Because of earlier COINTELPRO and other abuses, Attorney General Edward Levi (in 1976) established Guidelines “proceed(ing) from the proposition that Government monitoring of individuals or groups because they hold unpopular or controversial views is intolerable in our society.”





However, they eroded steadily, notably post-9/11, so today virtually anything goes extralegally on the pretext of national security. In 2008, Attorney General Michael Mukasey’s Guidelines were profoundly lawless, authorizing informants, surveillance, and other abusive practices in cases involving no suspected criminality.



For example, FBI agents may direct informants to collect names, emails, phone numbers, and other information about devout mosque attendees, based only on their religiosity.





Specifically, intrusive “assessments” may be made in situations with no “information or….allegations indicating” wrongdoing or threat to national security. As a result, groups or meetings infiltrated covertly, attendees questioned casually, and physical surveillance of “homes, offices and individuals” conducted extralegally.





The FBI’s Domestic Investigative Operational Guidelines (DIOGs) are used this way without supervisory approval or constraints on abusive practices. As a result, virtually anything goes, primarily against one segment of society, creating a troubling law enforcement standard common in police states unencumbered by laws.



Moreover, even though the 2003 DOJ Guidance Regarding the Use of Race by Federal Law Enforcement Agencies bans profiling by race and ethnicity, it implicitly permits doing so for faith and national origin purposes, as well as targeting anyone for national and border security purposes.





The Mukasey Guidelines also permit illegal entrapment and other abusive practices. As a result, federal, state and local law enforcement agencies lawlessly target Muslim communities to identify potential terrorists. In fact, New York city guidelines specifically permit intrusive investigations of “potential terrorist activity before an unlawful act occurs.”





Unconstrained informants are used, subject only to Deputy Commissioner of the Intelligence Division directives. As a result, “NYPD has become a leading advocate for law enforcement based on the flawed radicalization model,” authorizing illegal acts, including “inducement(s)….to engage in crim(inal)” activity to facilitate entrapment.





FBI guidelines also authorize expansive powers, including targeting individuals or groups for their views or religious practices. Critics include former FBI counterterrorism agent (now ACLU Senior Policy Counsel) Mike German, saying “the FBI (is) out of compliance with its (own) guidelines to an extraordinary extent,” by providing few checks on illegal practices, including entrapment.





It occurs when law enforcement officials or agents induce, influence, or provoke crimes that otherwise wouldn’t be committed. However, it doesn’t apply in willing lawlessness instances, government merely aiding, abetting, or facilitating chances to do so.





Specifically, it involves:



– government officials or agents initiating the idea; then
– persuading individuals to discuss, plan or commit actions they otherwise never intended.




To convict, prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt no entrapment was used. In fact, it’s  common against innocent people, especially Muslims targeted for political or other reasons.





CHRGJ concluded that “types of evidence relied upon by the government in terrorism-related prosecutions are highly prejudicial, and build on the conflation of Muslim religious practice, political opinions critical of US foreign policy, and (alleged) terrorism. The prejudicial nature of relying on such evidence is magnified” by entrapment, claiming defendants’ are predisposed to commit crimes, based on fabricated, secret, or other evidence to prejudice, pressure, and intimidate juries to convict.





Based on empirical research, however, no link exists between religion or political views and a propensity to commit violent acts. Nonetheless, most convictions result from bogusly conflating them as proof of “intent or predisposition.”





As a result, victims are usually defenseless against abusive government practices, including through wrongful conviction civil rights lawsuits right-wing courts rule against or disallow, especially in national security related cases involving alleged terrorism or conspiracy to commit it.





CHRGJ covered several case examples, including David Williams, one of “the Newburgh Four (NY)”, bogusly charged with plotting to blow up a Bronx synagogue and shoot down military aircraft with Stinger surface-to-air missiles. Using an FBI sting, an informant was lawlessly used to entrap them. Despite no plot or crime, they were arrested, charged and convicted.





Another case involved Eljvir, Dristan and Shain Duka, three of the Fort Dix Five, falsely charged and convicted on multiple counts, including planning to attack US soldiers at Fort Dix, NJ, despite no plot, crime or legitimate evidence. Another entrapment sting operation was used.





A third case involved Shahawar Siraj Matin, also entrapped by a police informant in an alleged subway bombing plot despite no crime or intent to commit one.





Another case involves two Bowling Green, KY Iraqis (Mohanad Shareef Hammadi and Waad Ramadan Alwan) beyond the study’s timeline, the Louisville Courier-Journal saying on May 31 they were indicted on terrorism charges.





Specifically, they were charged with “conspiring to kill US soldiers with improvised explosive devices in Iraq,” as well as plans to send Stinger missiles, cash, sniper rifles, and rocket-propelled grenade launchers to Iraq.



In fact, the alleged plot is as implausible as attacking Fort Dix, downing military aircraft, attacking marines at Quantico, VA, bombing New York landmarks, and other concocted schemes to entrap and convict innocent victims.





A Final Comment





CHRGJ said “practices described in the Report raise serious concerns about the US government’s compliance with its international human rights obligations,” including rights to a fair trial, non-discrimination, freedom of expression, religion, and other rights under US and international law.





Federal, state, and local enforcement agencies systematically violate them to target and convict unjustly, sending innocent victims to prison for being Muslims in America at the wrong time, leaving everyone just as vulnerable.





As a result, it’s “proved impossible for” victims “to gain redress” at a time imperial priorities take precedence. Its ravages are felt abroad and at home, especially by Muslim families.





Wives lose husbands, children their fathers, and wrongfully convicted Muslim men their freedom, some for decades or the rest of their lives to satisfy America’s lust for conquest and domination, no matter the human cost.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening. He is also the author of “How Wall Street Fleeces America“

 http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/06/19/entrapping-innocent-muslims/




Les reseaux israeliens activant au sein de l'Elysée, Levallois-Peret, Marseille, Place Beauvau sous tres haute tension. La chute de la 'maison mossad' imminente ?!



Abu-Suleyman8:53 AMNo comments



Quand Gueant annoncait que les exercices 'anti-terroristes' du 17 Juin 2011 en banlieue parisienne etaient tenus secrets, il devait etre sous effet de la cocaine.... Nous apprenons que les dealers de  came ont maintenant peur que leurs cargaisons soient coulées en Méditerannée. Il faudrait que le GIGN et le RAID s'entrainent a voler de Paris jusqu'en Corse pour pouvoir eviter que le came ne soit pas perdue en mer. Ce serait bien que les francais voient qui fait rentrer la dope en France! Tu crois vraiment que le RAID peut voler de Paris avant que le bateau ne coule ? Qu'est ce que tu prends avec Pasqua? De l'israelienne ? Il y a une seule et unique grille de lecture pour ces exercices de manipulations.






Pour ceux qui suivent le blog assidument, nous avons prevenu la semaine derniere et les semaines auparavant d'operations terroristes sionistes en Europe pour l'été 2011, le gouvernement francais travaille a une fausse attaque AQMI depuis Novembre 2008, la DCRI n'a jamais pu se remettre de cette affaire et la elle vient de se prendre encore une gifle. Vous devez avoir l'habitude maintenant bande d'incompetents racistes, le jour meme !



Avertissement d'attentats sous fausse banniere allant du 10 Juin 2011 au 26 Novembre 2011.  Cliquez-ici. !





Anti-terrorisme : trois attaques simulées en Ile-de-France 







Une opération sans précédent de simulation d'attentats de type NRBC (nucléaire, radiologique, biologique et chimique) ont eu lieu vendredi en région parisienne.  




Paris et sa région ont connu vendredi une simulation d'attentats d'une ampleur exceptionnelle. Le scénario du ministère de l'Intérieur et de la préfecture de police, révélé par Marianne 2, a imaginé simultanément une attaque chimique d'un kamikaze à l'Ecole militaire (Paris VIIe), une autre offensive chimique suivie d'une explosion dans un train à Massy-Palaiseau (Essonne), tandis qu'une troisième bombe toxique explosait au centre d'essais des propulseurs de Saclay (Essonne).







SUR LE MÊME SUJET

Un intrus sème la panique au ministère de l’Intérieur



Le bilan imaginaire de ces trois attaques s'élève à six morts et une centaine de victimes contaminées, tandis que deux prises d'otages sur des sites pétrochimiques étaient simultanément reconstituées sur un site militaire à Beynes (Yvelines) mais virtuellement distantes de plusieurs dizaines de kilomètres. L'objectif de l'opération est de faire collaborer les effectifs du Raid et du GIGN.

Au total, ce sont 1300 policiers, gendarmes, secouristes du Samu et pompiers, ainsi que des services de la Justice, qui ont été mobilisés pour cette opération baptisée NRBC 11. Le ministre de l'Intérieur  a supervisé l'exercice depuis le bunker souterrain de la place Beauvau. Trois hôpitaux franciliens (Percy à Clamart, Necker et Lariboisière à Paris) ont également participé à cette simulation, qui prévoit également le passage au niveau écarlate du plan Vigipirate. Ce niveau d'alerte maximal permet aux autorités d'interrompre les transports en commun et de fermer les grands lieux de rassemblements.







LeParisien.fr
http://www.leparisien.fr/paris-75/anti-terrorisme-trois-attaques-simulees-en-ile-de-france-17-06-2011-1497973.php




Le seul moyen d'envoyer des troupes au sol est de faire sauter des bombes en France et tuer un maximum de civils comme en 1995. C'est ce a quoi travail Sarkozy et Gueant afin que la France puisse envoyer des troupes en Libye, Egypte, Algerie pour le mois d'Octobre 2011, avec les 30000 mercenaires US pret a debarquer.



Abu-Suleyman1:38 PMNo comments



Le silence de la croisade de Sarkozy devant les victimes civiles en Libye



 

Par Nabila Ramdani, 
The Guardian (UK) 20 juin 2011


Il y a à peine plus de trois mois, Nicolas Sarkozy conviait la presse mondiale à l’Elysée pour annoncer le début de son offensive aérienne contre la Libye. Le Conseil de sécurité des Nations unies venait tout juste [le 17 mars] de voter la résolution 1973 — qui autorisait une intervention pour « protéger les populations civiles » —, et les dirigeants occidentaux, dont David Cameron et Hillary Clinton, s’étaient retrouvés à Paris pour peaufiner les détails des opérations militaires, mais plus rien n’arrêtait « Speedy Sarko ». 


Entrant fièrement par une double porte dans un des salons grandioses de l’Elysée, le président français avait déclaré aux journalistes, avec un rictus déterminé, qu’en « ce moment même » (voix forte, torse bombé et menton levé), les as français pulvérisaient les chars et les soldats de Kadhafi sur une vague route perdue à l’ouest de Benghazi. 


Peut-être les Rafale qui s’acquittaient de la tâche étaient ceux-là même que Sarkozy avait tenté de vendre à Kadhafi lors de sa visite d’Etat à Paris, seulement quatre ans plus tôt, mais qu’iimporte : l’heure était à la célébration d’une initiative martiale bleu-blanc-rouge, non au souvenir d’échecs commerciaux. A écouter Sarkozy, on aurait pu croire qu’il parlait du général Philippe Leclerc et de sa 2e DB, fer de lance de la libération de Paris en 1944. La gigantesque machine de guerre américaine assurait peut-être une fois encore l’essentiel de l’offensive, mais les véritables héros qui se trouvaient en première ligne en Libye brandissaient les couleurs sacrées de la France. 



Autant d’allusions que la presse française buvait comme du petit lait, impatiente d’assister à une aventure militaire brutale mais rapide qui aboutirait au renversement d’un tyran et l’empêcherait de « tuer son propre peuple ». Dans le même temps, Sarkozy pourrait profiter de cette honorable croisade contre un ancien allié pour faire oublier ses piètres prestations sur le plan intérieur. 



 Aujourd’hui, cette même presse hexagonale se fait étrangement silencieuse alors que, selon toute hypothèse, ce serait un missile français qui aurait frappé un pâté de maisons à Tripoli [le 19 juin aux petites heures de la matinée], tuant au moins neuf civils, dont de jeunes enfants, et en blessant des dizaines d’autres. Des journalistes qui font autorité, y compris britanniques, travaillant en Libye, estiment que « la défaillance du système d’armes » (jargon de l’OTAN) est due à une erreur de l’armée française. 



Or Paris a dans les faits imposé un black-out sur ce sujet dans la presse. Le lendemain de cette attaque meurtrière, pas un mot dans la presse française, à la télévision ou à la radio, sur les éventuels responsables. « Peu importe qui a tiré ce missile », m’a dit une source du ministère de la Défense. « C’est une opération conjointe — nous y participons tous. » Quand je lui a demandé directement si c’était un missile français qui avait tué des civils, il m’a répondu : « Sans commentaire. » Des commentateurs plus sceptiques m’affirment que cette intervention coûte à la France l’équivalent de plus de 1 million d’euros par jour, que les équipages des avions et bateaux sont « dangereusement » surmenés, et que la stratégie de Kadhafi, terré dans son bunker, est payante. 



De manière tout aussi pertinente, certains analystes militaires précisent que les missiles air-sol français SCALP, peut-être à l’origine de ce drame, coûteraient jusqu’à 800 000 euros chacun. Mais le vrai coût de l’enlisement de cette guerre sordide s’avère bien plus élevé. Sarkozy et ses généraux commencent à s’en apercevoir.



Traduction courrier international, 



Texte original : 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jun/20/libya-civilian-casualties-france-sarkozy/print




United Kingdom False Flag Forecast, Summer 2011



Abu-Suleyman7:43 AMNo comments







 Transferring the Western power from London, to Washington, to Jerusalem. 2012, the year Israel took definitive control of the Western civilization ? 

1776: The birth of America
1948: Foundation of State of Israel
2012: LONDON (New Zion), TEMPLE MOUNT (Jerusalem or the 'original' Zion)


 By Abu Salem Sofyan, Islamic Intelligence and Captain Eric H. May, Iconoclast Intelligence



WEDNESDAY, 6/22/11 -- The often unspoken and officially unspeakable fear overhanging Europe this summer is that Israel will carry out a new 9/11 attack against it. The announcement last month that Interpol had created a nuclear terror unit inspired more fear than faith.


London intelligence insiders, speaking on condition of anonymity, inform us that Mossad is planning a false flag operation against the city's new Olympic stadium for mid-August. August 12 is a day to mark, they say, since it will be one year before the 8/12/2012 opening of the London Summer Olympics. They add that young Pakistanis living in the poorest parts of London will be blamed, and that Scotland Yard has already prepared a long list of suitable suspects.


Like all good false flag plans, this one offers prizes to perpetrators, bounties to betrayers and fodder to fascists -- all necessary to keep the cabal in cahoots. The Israeli Interlopers are already in Britain's backyard, posing as guard dogs, while authorities pretend to be deaf dumb and blind about it all. It's strikingly similar to 7/7 and 9/11:






London is Israel’s laboratory for 2012 summer Olympics






The current issue of Private Eye reports that Heathrow Airport will have shiny new equipment for screening passengers installed with the help of several Israeli firms as part of preparations for next year’s Olympic Games. The sporting event affords an opportunity to run a “live test” on the Total Airport Security System (TASS).

The Israeli false flag plan may include both the UK and the US simultaneously. The American government faces financial default in mid-August, and would welcome a major distraction. It may even be that a London false flag attack is part of a late-summer world war plan -- the last two world wars began in late summer, after all. Multinational, multifaceted and multipurpose false flag operations aren't rare, and have occurred in recent memory:

7/11/06: Half a day after the Mumbai train bombings, there was a train bombing scare in Chicago. A thousand terrified commuters thought that they were under attack, and more than a hundred were sent to area hospitals. On the same day the Bush Family and its retainers were assembling in Houston, ostensibly for Ken Lay's funeral, The next day, while they praised and buried their crooked crony, Israel invaded Lebanon. The plot could have come right out of The Godfather.

10/18/07 started with a false flag alert to the Houston area petrochemical industry, followed four hours later by a nearby Dow Chemical explosion. Portland's KBOO radio confirmed the news. They were interested because it was their last day in the ominous TOPOFF-4 radioactive bomb exercise, in which their city was ground zero. The first assassination attempt against Benazir Bhutto happened between the Dow Chemical explosion and the KBOO news broadcast. That afternoon Houston's petrochemical area was closed off for four hours because of a radioactive accident. At the same time Homeland Security Director Michael Chertoff appeared in Portland to command the dirty bomb drill. It soon began to go live when a bomb alert from Chertoff's entourage forced a downtown evacuation. In the middle of it all came a stark warning from Capitol Hill:





United States Democratic Congressman Slams Bush
"The truth is, Bush just likes to blow things up in Iraq, in the United States and in Congress!" -- Representative Pete Stark, 10/18/07
Global military operations were certainly in action on both days. They included options for false flag attacks against Chicago, Houston and Portland as provocations for pulling the U.S. deeper into the quicksand war in the Middle East, probably beginning with an attack against Iran.




United Kingdom Secondary Targets
(London Is the Primary)
The Dover-Calais Passage: ICTS is the Israeli security company involved in both 9/11 and 7/7. French president Nicolas Sarkozy, identified as a Mossad Jewish sayan (helper) by the major French newspaper Le Figero, last year awarded ICTS the security contract for the Port of Calais in the North of France. This means that the English Channel cities of Calais and Dover are likely factors in any Israeli false flag plans against Northwest Europe.

Southampton has one of the biggest ports in Northern Europe for shipments to and from the United States. This makes it an ideal place to smuggle, store and finally ship nukes or dirty bombs to U.S. East Coast cities. Or to look at it the other way around, Southampton is a natural target for a U.S. East Coast false flag operation (cleared by the British government, of course) to engage an expendable UK city.

United Kingdom Muslims are a target, too. The outcome of Queen Elizabeth's May visit to Northern Ireland has been a renewal of troublesome times in the Emerald Island, and a general rise in Irish/English tensions. Under ever-expanding "national security" and "anti-terror" powers, ethnic conflict is a fine trigger for domestic despotism. Did the queen's Irish campaign aim to provoke the troubles of late spring in order to train forces for something more dire in late summer?

If the false flag happens expect:




Reduction of Christian/Muslim relations.
Repression of United Kingdom Muslims.
Reneging on Muslim Olympics contracts.
Restriction of Muslim Olympics workers.
Revitalization of anti-Muslim jingoism.
Retaliation against Pakistan and/or Iran.

What kind of devils prepare, perform and profit from such inhumanity against humanity? The same devils who have always done so. We described them as tyrants of terror and merchants of menace in our last article, in which we designated Chicago, Houston and Portland as the top three false flag targets in the USA.

God willing, we'll post our next article Thursday or Friday. It will examine the German false flag danger, so worrisome that a German attorney recently officially filed: Warning Nuclear Terror Attack June 26, 2011, Berlin Olympia Stadium, FIFA Women`s Soccer World Cup.





Qu'ran Chap 17, Al-Isra; verse 4



"And We gave (clear) warning to the children of Israel in the Book, that twice would they do mischief on the land and be elated with mighty arrogance (And twice would they be punished)!"


The authors dedicate this article to the memory of anti-warrior Brian Haw, who kept a lonesome vigil for his slumbering country. Requiescat in pace.





A Berlin A-Bomb on Sunday 6/26/2011?



Abu-Suleyman10:11 PMNo comments



 

As above, so below ! Here is for you massa, after the false flag, I give you Germany as a gift to the 'machiah' for his coming return to Zion (Jerusalem).



 

By Captain Eric H. May, Iconoclast Intelligence
WEDNESDAY, 6/22/11 — German Attorney Torsten van Geest has submitted a provisional order to force the German government into action in light of what he claims are multiple indicators of an impending nuclear terror attack at Berlin’s Olympic Stadium on June 26, 2011, during the opening ceremony of the Women’s World Soccer Championship.


U.S. officials knew about similar indicators before the September 11, 2001 attacks, but did nothing to prevent them, he says, adding that this time such indicators should be publicized to help prevent an attack.
The 400-page provisional order states that many nations have conducted so-called “false-flag” terror attacks, blaming them on unpopular ethnic groups or countries to create conflict and justify wars. They are advancing a world domination agenda, It argues, to concentrate power in the hands of a shadowy power elite who control governments and organizations.

For more refer to: WARNING: Nuclear Terror Attack on June 26, 2011, Berlin Olympia Stadium, FIFA Women`s Soccer World Cup 2011.




« Murderous assault by the United States, UN and NATO on the people of Libya », Ramsay Clark



Abu-Suleyman10:10 PMNo comments



 That the UN is under the grip and manipulation of the US and its other European allies, including Israel, Australia and Canada, is not in doubt.  After Muammar al-Gadhafi’s Libya befriended the Europeans with the instigation and help of European agent Nelson Mandela of South Africa, Gadhafi signed many oil and other deals worth billions of dollars with the US and other European countries.  Overnight, Gadhafi became a ‘pop star’, but not as nearly a pop star like Nelson Mandela, rubbing shoulders with President Barack Obama of the US, President Nicolas Sarkozy of France, PM Silvio Burlusconi of Italy, former British PM Tony Blair, and more.  The British Prince Andrew even secretly met Gadhafi (Daily Mail 20 March 2011).  Gadhafi even financed the elections of Nicholas Sarkozy and invested billions of dollars of the Libyan people’s money in banks such as Goldman Sachs and Société Générale of France, as reported and clearly outlined on Russia Today (RT).











French (Nato) missile destroys building in Tripoli murdering civilians

(including children) whose pictures are too gruesome to show



Even though the US branded Colonel Muammar al-Gadhafi a « mad dog », the US ensured that Libya was admitted as a member of the UN Human Rights Council in May 2010, only to have the country expelled in early 2011 when things turned sour and a minority of Libyans revolted against the pro-US Gadhafi regime exacting, not the common corrupt and war-mongering democracy, but freedom, justice, fairness and an end to the interference by Zionist and pro-Zionist European regimes.  Such African Arab revolt for freedom, which started in Tunisia and Egypt, whether in North Africa or elsewhere in the Middle East, such as Yemen, Bahrain and Syria, has all the same theme.  It has been nicknamed the « Arab Spring », although many analysts consider the uprising in Libya as different because no revolution took root since only a minority of rebels were involved.





While the US open support of the Hosni Mubarak tyrannical regime during the unfinished Egyptian Revolution backfired, they made sure they sided with the rebels in Libya, rebels which Gadhafi referred to as Al Qaida (a non-existent organisation) like his US masters usually do to justify bombings, property destruction and murders of civilians, men, women and children alike, thousands of miles from the shores of the US.  While Gadhafi vowed to root out those alleged armed Al Qaida rebels zenga-zenga, that is, street by street, like her European allies normally do, to his dismay, his allies decided to interpret this as a threat to ‘civilians’.  Gadhafi was accused of threatening to kill his own people and Britain and France, with whom Gadhafi signed so many deals and invested so many billions of dollars, pushed for a UN resolution for a no-fly zone over Libya in order to ‘protect civilians’.  The UN had also appointed the Chief Prosecutor Luis Moreno Ocampo of the International Criminal Court (ICC), which is really a European Court in the Hague, to establish if there were grounds for investigation into alleged crackdown on civilians in Libya.  In just 48 hours, Ocampo conveniently replied in the affirmative.  But no shred of evidence was produced to show that Gadhafi was even planning to kill civilians, let alone killed any.



In his speech, the UN President Ban Ki-moon also pushed for a resolution against Libya, not based on evidence from any UN fact finding mission which never took place, but based on uncorroborated « reports » from the European Zionist-controlled media and bias organisations like the European Human Rights Watch and the ICC. This clearly demonstrates what Ban Ki-moon, who has been newly re-elected UN President, really stands for. Civilised countries should seriously consider pulling out of the UN unless it is fundamentally reformed.  As it stands, the UN has clearly lost its right to exist.



UN Resolution 1973 does not cover armed rebels

On 17^th March 2011, with the abstentions of Russia and China (who probably saw Gadhafi as a US agent), and three other countries, the UN passed Resolution 1973 which authorises the implementation of a no-fly zone over Libya to protect civilians and, in the context of the said no-fly zone, to take « all necessary measures » to protect civilians under threat of attack.  The resolution excluded any ground invasion, nor did it advocate siding with or arming the rebels or regime change in Libya.  But no hostile aircraft threatening civilians ever took off.  Nevertheless, with France taking a swift lead, US-Nato forces bombed the infra-structure of Libya murdering hundreds of civilians in the process, which they grotesquely refer to as « collateral damage ».  They set out to change the regime and to assassinate Muammar Gadhafi and his family, and did succeed in murdering one of his sons and three of his grandchildren.  They even trained and armed the rebels to overthrow Gadhafi.  The people of Benghazi accused the US-armed rebels of atrocities.



The UN effectively sanctioned the killing of Libyan civilians, assassinations and regime change in Libya.  In a Press Conference at the UN Plaza Hotel on 15^th June 2011, Hon. Minister Louis Farrakhan exposed the US-Nato criminal war on Africa Libya, and blasts the « Coalition of Demons ».  At the same conference, Ramsey Clark, former US Attorney General speaks of the « Murderous assault by the United States, UN and NATO on the people of Libya », while Human Rights Activist Viola Plummer refers to « the imperialist aggression in our homeland, Africa » and to Zbigniew Brzezinski’s chessboard that Africa is the « focal point for the Empire’s re-colonisation ». Speaking live to the Conference from Tripoli, Activist Cynthia McKinney, former Congress Woman from Georgia, confirms how she witnessed « NATO terror » on the people of Libya.



In blatant contravention of Resolution 1973, the relentless bombing of Libya has been going on for three months with immense property destruction and loss of civilian life, all with the complicity of the UN.  Ban Ki-moon who allowed the massacres in and wanton destruction of Libya to go on, makes no comments about sending in a fact-finding mission.  As the situation stands, the Gadhafi government is not fighting civilians, but armed rebels supported and armed by US-Nato, and they do not come under Resolution 1973.  This is how the US-Nato Alliance distorted the meaning of the resolution in order to murder and plunder oil-rich Libya, on whose resources they rely so much, not to mention the freezing (stealing) of the billions of dollars of Libyan assets in their banks and elsewhere just like they stole the assets of the Iranian people after the overthrow of the US stooge Shah Reza Pahlavi in 1979.  The US-backed Saudis better watch out for the Arabian assets when people start rising against their tyranny!  Although Russia is wrong to ask Gadhafi to step down, Russia has been denouncing US-Nato contravention of the UN Resolution 1973 for several months and been asking for a political solution by the Libyan people without outside interference.  The UN should set aside resolution 1973 for clear breach and in order to alleviate the suffering of the Libyan people, a suffering which never existed under Gadhafi.



Strides of Muammar al-Gadhafi

In a bloodless coup in 1969, Muammar Gadhafi replaced US-backed dictator King Idris who was sucking the blood of his people, nationalised oil and pushed the British and the US out of Libya.  This is how he became an enemy of the European West and was demonised by them.  When Iranian PM Mosaddegh nationalised oil, the CIA-MI6 overthrew his democratic government in 1953 in Operation Ajax.  Gadhafi did not use people’s money to build palaces as he lived in a tent.  He built thousands of homes, schools and hospitals for his people, and built an appropriate infrastructure to support his people.  No one is homeless and poverty was almost non-existent, until now under the bombings.  For his parents, who also lived in a tent, he said that they would not be housed until every Libyan has a roof over their head; he kept that promise.  Crime rate is the lowest in the world.  This does not mean that there is no dissatisfaction in Libya, but this is an internal matter.  In 1999, Gadhafi even put forward the concept of the United States of Africa and he became a model for other African states.  But, with the intervention of European agent Nelson Mandela, who once described Gadhafi as one of the « 20^th century greatest freedom fighters », Gadhafi was lured into the arms of his bitter enemies, who tried to assassinate him in 1986, in attempt to get the 10-year West European economic sanctions lifted.  Today, we witness the results of Gadhafi’s faux pas.  His country is being destroyed by European Warlords and warmongers.  There is no Libyan revolution.



Conclusion

While US-Nato were quick to bomb Libya to ensure they benefit from its oil and to use the bombing to steal the billions of dollars belonging to the Libyan people, they drag their feet against the uprising in Bahrain and the murder of civilians by the Bahraini tyrannical regime, a Sunni pro-US minority while the population is 70% Shia.  As a counter-revolutionary measure, the US even arranged for their allies, the Saudi tyrants, to send in troops to Bahrain to quell the revolt with brute force.  In reality, behind the scenes, the US is leading counter revolution in particular Arab and North African countries to sustain pro-US regimes. On 7 June 2011, the US allowed the IMF to loan US$ 3 billion to Egypt in order to keep Mubarak’s men in the pyramid of power.  This is clearly a bribe as no elections have yet been held and the same regime is still in power.   The US also supported the Yemeni President Dictator, Abu Abdullah Saleh, against the protestors seeking freedom and justice, killing hundreds of civilians in the process.  After Saleh was hurt in an attack, the US sent in its drones from a secret base in Gulf, to kill even more civilians (Al Qaida!) who are seeking freedom from tyranny.  People would recall that the US also armed and supported Sadam Hussein of Iraq and Shah Reza Pahlavi of Iran in the killings of their own people.  Throughout their bloody imperial history, European countries are well-known for the callous murder of civilians, the destruction of their way of life in order to impose their own and to plunder their riches, be it gold, diamond, uranium, oil, gas, and so on.  The US and its European allies have absolutely no lesson to give the world in the protection of human rights and the protection of civilians.  They are the ones who should be prosecuted for crimes against humanity.



Through a complicit UN, the US disarmed Saddam Hussein of Iraq in order to make it easier for them to invade the country and install a regime of their liking.  Similarly, through their goodwill ambassador Nelson Mandela, Gadhafi was persuaded to give up his weapons so important for the defence of Libya.  The result we see today is that this has made it much easier for US-Nato to bomb the country, kill its people and destroy its infrastructure.  Nelson Mandela is nowhere to be heard.  For years, the US has been leading a similar campaign for Iran to give up her rights to nuclear energy which technology they fear could be used by Iran to better defend herself against attack, like the one mounted in the 1980’s by a pro-US Saddam Hussein.



M Rafic Soormally

London

23 June 2011





Trois mois apres le debut de la guerre civile en Libye, la Chine entreprend de detruire le systeme bancaire francais au travers de la dette grecque et britannique au travers des dettes espagnole et portuguaise. La flambée organisée des prix du petrole et du gaz pour soutenir le dollar mourrant mettront le gouvernement francais en faillite totale d'ici a Decembre 2011. En Septembre, suite a la faillite de l'economie japonaise, la banque israelienne Goldman sucks frappera les epargnants francais, europeens volant tout ce qui est possible de voler



Abu-Suleyman11:30 PMNo comments



MESSAGE URGENT A L'ADRESSE DES MUSULMANS VIVANT AU MAGHREB, SAHEL, AFRIQUE, EUROPE. PREPAREZ-VOUS AU COMBAT  ET A LA GUERRE CIVILE ORGANISEE PAR LE GOUVERNEMENT FRANCAIS!







Nous conseillons de maniere urgente a tous les Musulmans de France, Angleterre, Allemagne, Italie, Espagne, Maghreb, Afrique dont le systeme bancaire est sous tutelle du syteme colonial bancaire francais, de retirer immediatement toutes leurs economies et de trouver soit des lieux surs, soit de convertir son argent en achetant de l'or (bijoux, etc) soit de l'argent metal, soit des biens immobiliers. Si vous laissez vos economies en banque le gouvernement francais vous le prendra par la force pour payer la dette des banques francaises en Grece, Espagne et Europe de l'Est. Lisez l'article ci-dessous. Peparez-vous a un manque de liquidité pour le mois de Ramadhan partout en Afrique et en France, du fait des reseaux bancaires afro-maghrebins sous tutelle coloniale de Paris. Les chinois ont prevu de laisser s'effondrer les principales banques francaises en represaille a l'attaque sur la Libye pour affaiblir la France-Israel au Maghreb-Sahel et reprendre la main sur les mines d'uranium d'Imarouene au Niger par exemple, ou la captation des champ de gaz algeriens et libyens.  





Cette alerte vaut pour les pays du Maghreb en particulier. La Chine et Goldman Sachs speculent sur la faillite du systeme bancaire francais comme deja annoncé sur ce blog au mois d'Avril 2011 et la Grande Bretagne suivra des le mois d'Octobre 2011. Ceci etant la suite logique de l'invasion de la Libye, par les occidentaux qui a defaut d'etre en banqueroute bancaire et financiere tentent de mettre la main directement sur toutes les matieres premieres en Afrique pour tenter de survivre et sauver certains pans de leurs economies. 



Durant l'été, la flambée des prix du brut et du gaz provoqueront un cataclysme en France car, les puits libyens ne sont pas securisés comme il se doit (c'est le but de l'intervention au sol programmée depuis le depart) et les entrées d'armes de troisieme et quatrieme generation sur le sol libyen auront raison de l'OTAN en quelques mois, avec la destruction des puits sous controle occidental, qui est une priorité pour plusieurs clans locaux liés a des interets chinois au Maghreb et au Soudan. 



La France-Israel ne dispose donc plus de moyens de controler la chute de l'economie francaise. Comme annoncé par le juif sioniste Louis Aliot, dans sa lettre mariniste au parlement francais, les européens si ils veulent survivre n'auront plus d'autre choix que d'envahir massivement l'Afrique du Nord et l'Algerie en particulier pour securiser les flux energetique, joli euphemisme pour decrire le vol massif et le pillage des ressources (eau, petrol, gaz, posphate, silicium, iridium, uranium, palladium, tungstene, cuivre, etc... ), provoquant une guerre civile en France, d'ou le projet de loi sur la double nationalité a Paris afin de commencer a charger et mater et mettre au silence les afro-maghrebins de France et legitimer leurs massacres ou ceux de leurs familles restées aux pays. 



Le second point a soulever est que les israliens de France, Allemagne et Angleterre preparent des attentats AQMI depuis 2008 et multiplient les menaces dans plusieurs pays européens ceci pour simplement obtenir le droit sous mandat de l'ONU et l'excuse d'aller envahir la Libye puis le reste des pays du Maghreb le moment venu comme cela s'est passé le 11 septembre 2001.  Comme annoncé sur ce blog au mois d'Avril 2011, la faillite totale de l'economie francaise est aujourd'hui une realité, elle n'est pas due a la crise, mais bien a l'incomptence des elites de ce pays et leur soumission au projet messianique de domination mondiale. Les Musulmans doivent se preparer au pire et notamment a une guerre civile qui peut mantenant commencer a tout moment, surtout si Sarkozy declenche des attentats, ce qui est maintenant une probabilité a 80% .




Les multiples voyages des criminels de guerre au Maghreb et en Algerie n'ont d'autre but que de rassurer les investisseurs francais et couper cours aux rumeurs qui font dire que Sarkozy n'a pas assez de fonds pour 2012. La realité est la, Sarkozy n'a pas de fonds pour mener une campagne gagnante en 2012 et etre re-élu et le fait que l'emir du GIA/AQMI Juppé se soit rendu au siege de la Sonatrach  a Oran pour obtenir des garantis (organiser les malettes d'argent) a été un semi-echec, puisque la pression exercée sur les harkis generaux algeriens depuis la Libye inhibe totalement Alger et a provoqué une cassure tres profonde au sein du commandement algerien de l'armée voyant leur perte de monopole du pouvoir poindre avec l'invasion. Les gerants de la Sonatrach sachant egalement qu'ils seraient les premiers a tomber si de l'argent en masse venait a etre distribué a des israeliens en France, que ce soit le haineux Chevenement, Hollande, Montebourg, ou n'importe quels autres pantins racistes. Voila ou nous en sommes. 




Ceci est un rappel, une nasiha, elle ne fait que refleter la dure realité et n'exagere en rien l'etat des lieux. Musulmans preparez vous au combat et soyez pret, l'ennemi sioniste provoquera la guerre pour rester au pouvoir!



Quant a ceux qui appelent a voter pour un des pantins racistes du systeme franc maconnique  de l'extreme gauche a l'extreme droite, responsables de ce chaos, ils ne font que le jeu de l'ennemi sioniste en lui donnant du credit et une legitimité que le systeme n'a plus en occident, car bien malin est celui qui peut dire si il y aura des elections en 2012 en France ! 



Le systeme des elites nazies racistes francaises fera ce qu'il a toujours fait depuis la creation de la France, la guerre civile pour rester au pouvoir, ainsi appeler a voter est un crime et de la manipulation au lieu d'accompagner la chute du systeme et en s'assurant que les responsables du chaos en France en soient exclus, pour en recreer un autre plus representatif et plus viable de la maniere la plus raisonnable possible. Une transition.

Nous verrons qui en sortira vainqueur, mais il est hors de question que les Musulmans se fassent manipuler en allant voter pour des pantins qui appelent a leurs massacres ouvertement, que la France d'en bas tirent les lecons des soulevements des peuples Arabes, Dignes, Fiers, et qu'elle en fasse de meme si elle veut donner un avenir a ses enfants, ce systeme racialiste, esclavagiste de domination pyramidale par les banques doit tomber definitivement, le plus tot sera le mieux !








Abu-Suleyman
La Chine multiplie les avertissements aux banques francaises et est sur le point d'assomer le systeme bancaire francais au travers de la dette grecque




French Banks Warned on Their Greek Debt 

 

By MATT PHILLIPS , ELENA BERTON and SEBASTIAN MOFFETT
PARIS—Europe's sovereign-debt crisis washed closer to U.S. shores Wednesday after Moody's Investors Service warned it may downgrade three French banks that rely heavily on U.S. money funds for short-term financing.

Moody's cited the banks' exposure to Greek debt, and added that it may do the same to other euro-zone banks.

The three banks—BNP Paribas SA, Crédit Agricole SA and Société Générale SA—have all said recently that their exposure to Greece remains manageable. Analysts say a Greek default would cause them only small declines in the capital ratios used to measure financial strength. Shares in the three banks all fell 2.5% or more on Wednesday.







Michael Debets / Demotix

 



Two man queueing at an ATM outside a branch of the Emporiki Bank, part of French bank Crédit Agricole. The branch is closed due to a general strike in Greece. Moody's has warned of possible downgrades to French banks due to their exposure to Greek sovereign debt.









Still, the warning from Moody's followed heightened fears over the prospect of a disorderly Greek default, and its impact across financial markets. Investors have begun assessing the so-called contagion risk on global markets should European officials be unable to reach any agreement on how Greece's debt should be restructured.

One place many have been looking is the U.S. money markets, where massive funds buy up short-term debt of sovereign nations, banks and companies.

In recent years, some European banks have been some of the biggest borrowers in these markets. According to Fitch Ratings, as of February, 44.3% of assets at the 10 largest prime money market funds were invested in short-term loans to European banks.

BNP Paribas, Crédit Agricole and Société Générale have been among the biggest borrowers. As of May 31, those three plus another French bank, Natixis, had about $91 billion in outstanding debt with the top U.S. funds, or about 12% of total assets of the funds, Fitch estimated.

While the Moody's downgrade warning didn't impact the credit ratings on the banks' short-term borrowings, and investors for now aren't concerned about any fallout from the warning, the agency's announcement was a reminder of how financial markets remain deeply intertwined.

Money funds are only permitted to buy the highest-rated short-term debt. If those ratings appear under threat, money funds would quickly stop buying the debt, closing off a vital means of financing for the banks.
While many money managers have moved to curb their Europe exposure in recent months, the downgrade could prompt another wave of credit analysis among managers, said Brian Reid, chief economist for the Investment Company Institute, a Washington-based trade organization. "As new information comes to the market, asset managers are going to assess the risk of what they're invested in," Mr. Reid says. "You've already seen a general market pullback."
Some of the banks may now find some investors are willing to lend for shorter periods, said Alex Roever, money market strategist at J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. in New York.

The three French banks, which all declined to comment on the Moody's decision, are exposed to Greece in two ways: holdings of government debt and their own business activities in Greece.
The latest data from the Bank for International Settlements show that French banks have the largest overall exposure to Greece, totaling $56.7 billion, compared with $33.97 billion for German banks.






As of March 31, BNP's overall exposure to Greece was €5 billion; Crédit Agricole's was €21.7 billion, and Société Générale's was €5.9 billion, according to Moody's.
"What has changed is the risk of default of the Greek government," Nicholas Hill, senior credit officer at Moody's, said in an interview. "That raises direct and indirect consequences for the banks that are exposed to Greece."

For now, the affirmation by Moody's that the banks' short-term rating would remain intact "has been viewed positively by short-term investors," said Chris Conetta, head of global commercial paper trading at Barclays Capital.

Mr. Conetta said the banks' short-term paper was in demand on Wednesday.
"I think the market will stay very calm on these specific French banks," Mr. Conetta said. "They are large banks which have experience in the market and have been long-time issuers in the CP market. If anything, some investors may follow the usual pattern and buy CP with shorter maturities until Moody's finishes their review of the credit ratings."

The top French banks are able to borrow for three months at rates below 0.25%, traders said.
Moody's said Société Générale, unlike the other two banks, was under threat of a two-notch downgrade because of a technical review of the potential support it might get from institutions such as the French government or the European Central Bank.

Société Générale postponed the sale of a planned yen bond in Japan, known as a samurai bond, following the Moody's report, according to two people familiar with the planned deal.

—Mary Pilon, Min Zeng, Natasha Brereton-Fukui and William Horobin contributed to this article.



 http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304186404576386872909695108.html




Analyse du rapport sur la Libye et le CNT



Abu-Suleyman10:55 AMNo comments





Yves Bonnet, auteur du rapport sur la Libye, sur la gauche est un criminel de guerre. Conseiller personnel du criminel de guerre Smain Lamari, sur la droite, mort en 2007 d'une crise cardiaque officiellement. Smain Lamari etait un agent de la DST au depart comme Tewfik, ils sont avec le general Larbi Belkheir, mort en 2010, les createurs et commanditaires des GIAs/AQMI pour le compte du gouvernement francais. Les services francais impliqués dans le genocide de 550 000 algeriens ayant decidé d'effacer toutes les traces en eliminant Lamari, isolant Belkheir apres ses fuites sur l'affaire des moines de Tibhirines et les declarations ouvertes des emirs des GIAs indiquant que la DST et la police francaise les aidaient ouvertement sous les gouvernements Roccard, Beregovoy, Balladur, Juppé, Jospin. Bonnet, un 'gaulliste' de l'ancienne ecole, travaille egalement tres etroitement avec le mossad et fait parti de la 'maison mossad' en France avec Gueant, Pasqua, Sarkozy, Squarcini et d'autres.   
Par Omar Mazri, 
http://liberation-opprimes.net/




Ce qui ne semble pas jeter le trouble dans les esprits des Algériens et des Français est l’habitude des pratiques occultes qui laisse les relations franco algériennes opaques et sans avenir de progrès pour les peuples. Une de ces pratiques on la retrouve dans le rapport sur la Libye et le CNT libyen conduit par l’OTAN, rapport qu’on présente comme établi par des personnalités indépendantes qui s’oppose à la guerre menée contre la Libye : « Il n’est nul besoin d’insister sur la nature hautement critiquable de la dictature imposée, depuis 1969, par Muammar Kadhafi à ses concitoyens. Face à une telle situation, rien n’est plus légitime que l’aspiration à plus de liberté et de démocratie. Néanmoins, l’étude des faits conduit à affirmer que la « révolution » libyenne n’est ni démocratique, ni spontanée. Il s’agit d’un soulèvement armé de la partie orientale du pays, dans un esprit de revanche et de dissidence, qui tente de s’inscrire dans la dynamique du « printemps » arabe, dont il ne relève cependant pas. Le mouvement libyen ne peut donc être comparé avec les révoltes populaires tunisienne et égyptienne… ».





Quand on étudie ce rapport et l’écho qu’il a trouvé auprès des milieux gauchistes on constate le leurre qu’il entretient dans un esprit non averti ou dans une lecture hâtive qui lui fait dire ce qu’il ne dit pas. Ce rapport ne dit pas qu’il s’oppose à l’ingérence étrangère et à l’agression colonialiste en Libye* Il conteste le CNT pour des raisons idéologiques anti islamiques : « Surtout, la Libye est le seul pays du « printemps » arabe dans lequel le risque islamiste s’accroît, la Cyrénaïque étant la région du monde arabe ayant envoyé le plus grand nombre de djihadistes combattre les Américains en Irak ».

Ce rapport machiavélique est l’œuvre d’une équipe détonique. Le Prefet Yves Bonnet, ancien patron de la DST et actuel président du Centre international de recherche et d’études sur le terrorisme et d’aide aux victimes du terrorisme (CIRET-AVT). Éric Denécé, ancien agent du renseignement français et actuel expert en intelligence économique et  président  du Centre Français de Recherche sur le Renseignement (CF2R). Participe à ce rapport  le Forum pour la paix en Méditerranée qui est l’alternative à la résistance armée palestinienne montée par Israël, la France, l’Autorité palestinienne et les monarchies saoudiennes, marocaines et jordaniennes. Le dernier personnage, qui a donné crédit et audience large au rapport est l’algérienne Saïda Benhabylès. Ancienne ministre de la Solidarité, ancien Sénateur, primée par les Nations Unies pour la société civile elle est membre fondateur du CIRET-AVT.



Cette grande dame, membre du grata du microcosme politique algérien et de la société civile algérienne, s’est   mobilisée dans le projet de l’annulation des premières élections démocratiques en Algérie et convertie dans le clan des éradicateurs des islamistes algériens avec l’ancienne ministre de la Justice Leila Aslaoui et le premier ministre Réda Malek. Nous avons la parfaite illustration de la collusion entre les milieux du renseignement français avec les éradicateurs algériens. Ces milieux souhaitent et agissent en fonction de leurs souhaits de voir les révolutions arabes une consécration du modèle laïc européen islamophobe. Enfin il faut retenir qu’hier comme aujourd’hui que Saïda Benhabylès instrumentalise, comme tant d’autres indigènes intellectomanes, le mouvement associatif algérien comme une rente politique et que « elle ne croit pas cependant à la volonté des peuples et leurs capacités à s’affranchir d’eux-mêmes des jougs des dictatures qui les oppriment. Pour elle, les révolutions dans le monde arabe ont été tout simplement inspirées. ». Le renseignement français et les éradicateurs algériens ne pouvant faire réussir une révolution franco berbériste en Algérie sont pris de panique à l’idée que le mouvement islamique en Algérie se radicalise et s’équipe en armes auprès des « Jihadistes libyens ». 

La France connait ces enjeux et ces acteurs qu’elle alimente selon ses intérêts en soutien ou en abandon agissant comme un maitre échanson servant aux uns l’ivresse et aux autres la lie de la coupe de la cupidité et de la trahison en envoyant en Algérie les partisans, de gauche et de droite,  de la solution « arabe » : il faut aux arabes un minimum vital pour les rendre corvéables sans risquer l’insurrection car ils ne sont pas suffisamment civilisés pour être dignes de la démocratie… La France, oublie cependant que son image dans le monde est plus que ternie, et qu’elle est en train de jouer le temps mort de sa respectabilité sur les décombres macabres de ses interventions militaires illégitimes en Afghanistan, en Libye et en Côte-d’Ivoire. Après l'euphorie du dernier quart d'heure la France verrait une fois de plus son rôle en Afrique repris par les États-Unis. 




Les spécialistes du renseignement  paniquent aussi devant la théorie des dominos américains qui est en train de faire  tomber les cartes et les pions français en Algérie qui ont confisqué l’indépendance algérienne. L’investissement français en Algérie est pris en tenaille entre les Chinois et les Américains. Les Français sont en train de réaliser que les États-Unis leur ont volé le comptoir commercial nord africain alors que leur cinquième colonne algérienne étaient occupé à plonger l’Algérie dans une décennie rouge puis dans une décennie noire puis dans une troisième sans couleur. Ce rapport est en réalité une faute impardonnable pour les « patriotes » algériens qui ont fait de la patrie le dernier refuge des canailles. Les Algériens vont-ils avoir un sursaut de fierté nationale et démocratique devant les fossoyeurs de la démocratie, de l’arabité et de l’islamité ? Quand on voit les gesticulations de Ali Belhadj sur le dossier libyen, son empressement à soutenir le CNT libyen et à souhaiter la chute du tyran de Tripoli sans en analyser les conséquences régionales on est en droit de se dire que les Algériens sont facilement manipulables et qu’ils ne sont pas prêts à servir l’Algérie avec l’idéal et la lucidité qu’exige le mondialisme impérialiste…






* Omar Mazri : L’histoire, la géographie, l'idéologie, le livre vert et le drame libyen

Omar Mazri : Le CNT libyen incompétence ou imposture ?

O. Mazri : Djihad, démocratisation et partis politiques à l’heure des contre révolutions arabes

Omar Mazri : La Libye et BHL le filousophiste

Omar Mazri : Second souffle venant des Libyens ou effusion de sang pour le compte d’autrui ?

Susan Lindauer : Les crimes de guerre de l’OTAN en Libye

Manlio Dinucci : l'Afrique visée à travers la Libye

Michel Collon : Comprendre la guerre en Libye

Jean-Paul Pougala : Les mensonges de la guerre de "l'Occident judéo-chrétien" contre la Libye







--

"Allah! Donne-nous le courage de changer ce qui peut être changé, la sérénité d'accepter ce qui ne peut pas l'être et la sagesse pour distinguer l'un de l'autre".





Al Aqsa mosque : Why Muslims need to organize, reinforce the defense and the protection of Al Quds



Abu-Suleyman2:13 AMNo comments



VIDEO : The Strategic Importance of Isra & Miraj (8 parts)

By Sheykh Imran Hosein, 

www.imranhosein.org 

 



 
































 




Share: 




 


Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook







Related Posts:




Des colons sionistes ont l'intention de prendre d'assaut le tombeau de Youssef la semaine prochaine



Abu-Suleyman9:35 PMNo comments








Al-Qods occupée – CPI

www.palestine-info.info 



Des groupes de colons sionistes ont annoncé leur intention de relancer une cérémonie impliquant la mise en place de rituels talmudiques dans la tombe de Youssef à Naplouse dans le nord de la Cisjordanie occupé, au cours de la semaine prochaine.







D'autre part, l'armée sioniste a approuvé une nouvelle politique de sécurité pour contrôler l'entrée des colons sionistes au tombeau de Youssef, afin de les protéger lors de l'incursion. Cela a été rejeté par certaines organisations colonialistes qui menacent de ne pas respecter les nouvelles mesures sécuritaires sionistes en prenant d'assaut l'endroit pour y organiser des cérémonies au motif qu'il s'agit d'un "lieu religieux juif", selon leurs prétentions.





Les nouvelles mesures de sécurité sionistes comprennent la distribution de bracelets spéciaux aux colons sionistes qui disposent de permis pour entrer dans le tombeau de Youssef, et l'arrestation de toute personne que n'en porte pas, sans préciser la nature de ces bracelets.








Did Mossad sabotage Russian plane?



Abu-Suleyman2:34 PMNo comments



Israel's Mossad has been suspected in the deaths of a number of Iranian and Turkish nuclear scientists. Although Russian officials are calling the crash an "accident" caused by poor weather conditions and pilot error, there are reports that the plane caught fire and broke up before it crashed.
By Wayne Madsen






Several Russian nuclear engineers and scientists, including the nuclear expert who designed Iran's nuclear power plant at Bushehr, were killed when a RusAir Tupolev-134 plane crashed while landing at Petrozavodsk, the capital of the north-western Russian Republic of Karelia, on June 20. The five nuclear experts, Sergei Rizhov, Gennadi Benyok, Valery Lalyn, Nicolai Tronov, and Andrei Tropinov, were employed by Hydropress, one of the main Russian contractors at the Bushehr facility. The five had all worked at the Bushehr facility. The Russian nuclear engineers and scientists were among 45 people killed in the crash of the Russian airliner.







The Russian engineers had also been involved in nuclear power plant projects in India, China, and Bulgaria.



Israel's Mossad has been suspected in the deaths of a number of Iranian and Turkish nuclear scientists. Although Russian officials are calling the crash an "accident" caused by poor weather conditions and pilot error, there are reports that the plane caught fire and broke up before it crashed.





Last November, Iranian nuclear scientist Majid Shahriari was killed near Shahid Beheshti University in Tehran after unknown men on motorcycles placed an explosive in his car, which was detonated shortly afterward. Simultaneously, other motorcycle assailants placed a similar device on the car of nuclear expert Fereydoun Abbasi near the same university. The resulting explosion seriously injured Abbasi. In January 2010, Iranian nuclear expert Massoud Ali-Mohammadi was killed after a motorcycle bomb was detonated in front of his house.





In July 2009, Russian and Iranian nuclear experts were reportedly among those passengers killed when an IranAir Ilyushin-62M passenger plane skidded off the runway at Mashhad airport in northeast Iran.



In 2007, Iranian nuclear scientist Ardeshire Hassanpour, who worked at an Iranian nuclear facility in Isfahan, was said to have been assassinated by Mossad agents by being poisoned.





On January 28, 2008, WMR reported: "On November 30, 2007, there was another incident involving the nuclear community in Turkey. A AtlasAir McDonnell-Douglas MD-83 en route from Istanbul to Isparta broke up in mid-air in good weather just prior to it landing. There was no explosion and the wings, engines, and fuselage all separated neatly. All on board were killed. In fact, WMR learned that rescue workers were able to walk into the plane's cabin and retrieve personal belongings, including briefcases.





On board the aircraft was prominent Bosporus University nuclear scientist Engin Arik, who was to attend a nuclear conference in Isparta. She was accompanied on the flight by other Turkish nuclear scientists. Turkish TV showed soldiers with guns guarding the plane's wreckage. Isparta's Governor said the plane was not on its scheduled route and he did not understand why it crashed near the town of Keciborlu, seven miles from Isparta. Governor Semsettin Uzun said he never saw such a plane crash."





After the U.S. occupation of Iraq, hundreds of Iraqi scientists, including those working in nuclear and related disciplines, were reportedly assassinated by Mossad hit teams operating in Iraq. In some cases, the Iraqi scientists assassinated had been promised protection and safe passage to the United States by the CIA.



http://www.opinion-maker.org/2011/06/did-mossad-sabotage-russian-plane/




L'invasion de la Libye se fait avec la complicité de tous les acteurs locaux, le scenario iraquien se repete avec toutes les erreures passées



Abu-Suleyman11:36 PMNo comments



 Au sujet des crimes et des viols en Libye







Par Omar Mazri,

http://liberation-opprimes.net/





J'ai écris plus de 15 longs articles sur les révolutions tunisennes et égyptiennes ainsi que sur l'endiguement de la révolution en Algérie et l'imposture du CNT libyen.





Nous assistons a une offensive médiatique contre le CNT alors qu'il a été encensé comme démocrate. Par hasard on vient de réaliser qu'il est infiltré par les islamistes. Le terme islamiste galvaudé depuis longtemps par les fanatiques abrutis qui agissent volontairement ou involontairement pour les agendas etas-unisiens, sionistes et des despostes locaux pour semer la terreur et fermer toute approche politique et civilisationnelle du changement des régimes et des systèmes dans le monde musulman.







Ayant désavoué le CNT dans sa version se réclamant de l'Islam ou de la démocratie et ayant désavoué Cheikh Qaradhawi dans son empressement à emettre une fatwa d'assassinat sur Kadhafi et ayant critiqué al Jazeera pour sa propagande pour une raison objective : j'ai été formé à lire une image, sa grammaire et sa sémantique. Al Jazeera porte aujourd'hui le nom d'al Khanzeera pour la simple raison qu'elle s'est manifestée dans son rôle de taupe tapie dans la conscience arabe mais travaillant pour le sioniste, les états-unis et les monarchies illégitimes.




J'ai publié un article de Susan LINDAUER qui va dans le même sens.







Les articles de Susan et son qualificatif d'ancien agent de la CIA conjuguée à un matraquage sournois sur l'Islam qui a vocation à être barbare en mettant des vidéos horribles au crédit de sa thèse et la convergence du rapport des experts du renseignement français en collaboration avec l'algérienne Benhabilès, éradicatrice, montrent le scénario que j'avais prévu dés l'insurrection armée en Libye :





L'Occident après le recours au droit d'ingérence au nom de l'humanitaire sioniste séléctif dont j'ai détaillé l'historique, les acteurs et les mécanimes dans mon livre "Gaza la bataille du Forqane", va entrer dans la seconde série de l'opération criminelle :




Une fois l'infrastructure libyenne détruite (avec ou sans la disparition de son chef Kadhafi) on entre dans la criminalisation des insurgés pour deux buts :







1 - démanteler la libye et mettre un Karazaï libyen à Benghazi en proclamant une monarchie senoussie


2- étendre la lutte antiterroriste et la déployer en Afrique du Nord pour interdire une révolution islamique en Egypte et en Tunisie et prévenir un retour à la légalité en Algérie qui risque de ramener les islamistes au pouvoir





3 - morceller le Maghreb et l'Afrique sub saharienne en petites entités sous le contrôle de chefs de guerres et maintenir une guerre endémique qui empêche le décollage économique, la démocratie et la possibilité civilisationnelle de fusion africaine conjuguant arabité, islamité et africanité ouvrant la porte à un embryon de Khalifat islamique sous une forme moderne de gouvernance mondiale islamique ou de projet alter mondialiste islamique ou arabo afro islamique qui peut se mettre en bipôle avec l'euro Asie de Shangaï coupant les vivres au colonialisme américain et européen.






Celui qui veut voir les images et les articles de Susan et se faire une idée de ce qui se prépare voici les liens :






http://www.lepost.fr/article/2011/06/28/2535796_la-laide-verite-video-de-rebelles-libyens-decapitant-un-soldat-de-kadhafi-et-autres-crimes-de-guerre-de-l-otan.html









Nous sommes à la veille de grands changements. Concentrons nous sur l'essentiel : la culture d'empire, celui de l'empire romain et sa fin. Cet empire ne s'effondrera que si le Badil, l'alternative existe, conformément à la Sunna d'Allah. Tant que le Badil n'est pas là nous subirons les clivages idéologiques, les shismes doctrinaires, les divergences ethiniques et les contradictions sociales et politiques qui nous détournent de nos devoirs de lucidité : Milatou al Korf Milatoun Wahida. Cette Mila a une suprématie sur nous : leur religion est fausse mais ils sont plus sincères, plus déterminés et surtout ils travaillent avec intelligence, ils font de la prospective sur la base de la connaissance documentée de notre Wahn. Ils savent que notre résistance relève de l'eschatologie et du messianisme pourtant étrangers à la culture mohammadienne.




Si Abassi Madani et Ali Belhad avaient eu l'intelligence, l'audace politique et la crainte d'Allah plus grande que des calculs mesquins pour dénoncer le terrorisme même du fond de leur prison l'initiative politique serait resté aux mains du peuple algérien et jamais les éradicateurs et les généraux n'auraient remporté une victoire sur le terrorisme qu'ils ont créé et fécondée. Al Qaradhawi doit avoir le courage politique, la lucidité religieuse et la vision stratégique d'étouffer le plan diabolique des sionistes et des impérialistes. Le retourt à la vérité est une vertu.




"Allah! Donne-nous le courage de changer ce qui peut être changé, la sérénité d'accepter ce qui ne peut pas l'être et la sagesse pour distinguer l'un de l'autre".












































 EXCLUSIVE: LIST OF THE MOSSAD AGENTS INVOLVED IN 9 / 11 CLAIMS THIS GREEK WEBSITE



Abu-Suleyman11:28 AMNo comments



The terrorist attack on 9 / 11 in 2001 against the twin towers in New York against the U.S. Pentagon was a 100% company conceived, organized and executed by the MOSSAD.



In connection with eos e-mail I received from a reader synellina, which I expressed wonder "why do not Israeli agents arrested on 9 / 11 in the U.S." ...., 





We quote the complete list of the agents of Mossad, who arrested by U.S. authorities for their involvement in the spectacular terrorist attack of 9 / 11 and proved they were agents of Mossad ...! In my hand I have an additional list of Israeli (with around 140 names) but they ultimately did not prove that it acted on behalf of Mossad, but synepikourousan agents of Mossad ways ...!



Note that the Mayor of Jerusalem Ehud Olmert intervened twice through good friend Zionist Mayor Rudolph Giuliani of New York to release the Israeli agents of 9 / 11. These are the 5 Israeli agents who were dressed as Arabs in the roof of a building against the World Trade Center and the building NO. 7, photographed, recorded with cameras that fact and who were jumping for joy when the aircraft ran into the twin towers. They were also together military-style handheld radios and most likely were those fired and explosives were placed inside buildings ...







The following list of Israeli agents issued by the DEA and most of them were military and intelligence experience ... However, the whole issue in both the U.S. and Greece received little publicity. Finally, I should mention that in this list does not include the dozens of Mossad agents were arrested for spying and involvement in 9 / 11 in Canada and Mexico.



LNU means stating that the name is unknown.



THE LIST OF AGENTS OF ISRAEL 9 / 11



1. BLAIN, Gat NADDIS negative, occupation: Israeli art student, sold painting to DEA employee in Dallas, TX on 01/04/2001 (Identified in paragraph 22)

2. FREIDMAN, Shabar NADDIS - Negative driver's license (# 6728447), ID (# 033056433)

3. AVRAHAM, Gerzon Ofir NADDIS - Negative. DOB (08/12177), Israel passport (# 6315574), Israeli Ministries of Transport ID (# 034193615)

4. LNU, Shahar NADDIS - Negative

5. BARAM, Lior NADDIS - Negative. Florida driver's license (# B650-520-76-047-0),

10733 Cleary Blvd., # 206, Plantation, Florida, 33324-0000, (DOB 02/07/76), 5'9 ", dark eyes and black hair

6. COHEN, Hammutal NADDIS - Negative DOB (01/29/62), Israeli passport (# 6077838), Immigration departure (# 41060016307 02/12/01), 5'8 ", 145 lbs.

7. RUBINSTEIN, Itay NADDIS - Negative DOB (01/17/79), US, visa (# 39127358), date of entry 12/23/00, Israeli passport (# 39127358) [sic, see visa], 6'0 ", 165 lbs.

8. AHARON, Ohad NADDIS - Negative

9. SEGAL, Yafit NADDIS - Negative

10. TOV, Yaniv Sheni NADDIS - Negative DOE (06/02/74) NADDIS negative

11. DOR, Sahlev NADDIS - Negative DOB (08/08/77) NADDIS negative AJ

12. GROSS, Hagit NADDIS - Negative DOB (09/30/78), Israeli passport (# 5111696)

13. SHLOMO, Rony NADDIS - Negative approximately 21 yoa

14. KOCHAVI, Inbar NADDIS - Negative Israeli passport (# 7674731)

15. DRORE, Rani NADDIS - Negative approximately 27 yoa

16. YOCHAI, Legurn NADDIS - Negative 13 753 SO 90th Ave., Mami, Florida 33176

17. MEYTAL, Cohen NADDIS - Negative. Address: c / o Calmanovic, 3575 N. Beltline Rd,, P.0, Box 316, Irving, Texas 75062. Addressed used by Michael Calmanovic, identified below

18. SISSO, Rosie NADDIS - Negative.

19. BURKHOLDER, Seth Thomas NADDIS - Negative. 3329 Bartlett Rd., Orlando, Florida, 1995 white Nissan pickup bearing Florida license plate D36-TTQ.

20. LNU, Elsa NADDIS - Negative.

21. SMITH, Travis Wayne NADDIS - Negative. white male, DOB (11/09/74), FBI No. 530083DBS (Assault - Domestic Violence) address: 615 S. Hardy, 4210, Tempe, Arizona

22. ESTRADA, Ramon Hispanic male, NADDIS - Negative. DOB (07/26/63), arrested 12/82 "processing marijuana for sale," 5 / 95 "transport / sell narcotics," 7 / 95 "transport / sell narcotics, adult giving minor narcotics," 8 / 95 "domestic violence. "FBI No. 7643 5FAG, CASID No. CA07401218, WASID No. WA17692473

23. GILOR, Yaniv Zacoravich NADDIS - Negative. registered owner of a 1997 Chevy van in San Diego, CA

24. MENDEL, Leviella NADDIS - Negative. 83 77 Tamar Drive, # 37, Columbia,

Maryland, DOB 10/29/75, Maryland driver's license # M-534-514-009-032, 5'7 ", 150 lbs. Additional inquiries revealed MENDEL has a new residential address, 4733 Haskell Ave., # 46, Encino, California.

25. SILVER, Danny NADDIS - Negative. (NFI)

The Tampa, Florida District Office identified the following individuals (# 26-942):

26. BENDALAK, Orit: NADDIS negative, DOB 10-28-78, WF, POB Israel, 5'7 ", 140 lbs., Brown hair, brown eyes.

27. BEZALEL ACADEMY OF ARTS AND DESIGN: NADDIS negative, Jerusalem, 011-972-2-589-3333, www.bezalel.ac.il.

28. COHEN, Eli: NADDIS negative, 701 S. 21 Ave. # 207, Hollywood, FL 33020, DOB 11/04/1977, FL DL C500-200-77-404-0, State of Israel Ministry of Transport card number 03379722

29. HARARI, Ilana: NADDIS negative, W / F, DOB 4-29-79, 9-29-79, 2-9-79, 14 Jerico Itolon Israel, attends University of Jerusalem, 5'3 ", 90 lbs. , brown hair, blue eyes, tattoo of sun on right foot.

30. KENDEL, Rachel: NADDIS negative, White / Female, State of Israel Ministry of Transport card number 7095201 and 034807727, Israeli passport number 6614254.

3 1. KUZNITZ, Keren: NADDIS - Negative. 1818 E. Oakland Park Blvd. # 98, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33306, DOB 02/09/1979, 5'5 "; FL driver's license: K253-500-79-549-0, State of Israel Ministry of Transport card number 7121535 and 035721844.

32. LNU, Nadav NADDIS - (NFI)

33. LNU, Tom NADDIS - Negative. White, male. Address: Hollywood / Ft. Lauderdale, Florida. Reportedly sells artwork to Israeli art students.

34. MARZIANO, Assaf or Asaf NADDIS negative, DOB 2-4-78, state of Israel Ministry of Transport # 034086959, passport # 552306S, POB Israel, WM, 5'7 ", 150 lbs,

35. MATATIA, Keren: NADDIS negative (NFI)

36. OSHRA, Sussie: NADDIS negative. (NFI)

37. SASSOON, Sarah Minna: NADDIS negative, 2916 Pierce St., 94, Hollywood, FL 33020, DOB 11/8/1978, FL DL # S250-793-79-908-0.

38. SELLA, Livnet: NADDIS negative, DOB 12/24/1978, State of Israel Ministry of Transport number 7023400 and 036208023, International Student Idenitity card number S972-204-776-601.

39. SERFATY, Hanan, aka Hanane SARFATI: NADDIS negative, 4220 Sheridan St., # 303, Hollywood, FL 33.021, and 701 S. 21 Ave., Hollywood, FL, DOB 06/03/1977, 6 ', FL DL S613-320-77-203-0, registered owner of red mini-van FL tag # U71 DLD, phone number (954) 478 - 1006, cellular phone number (954) 478-0961.

40. SIMON, Michael: NADDIS negative, w / m, 11-23-78, Aliebenliezel 82, Jerusalem, telephone number 97226768256, Israeli passport no. 8660008, POB Jerusalem, 6'1 ", 180 lbs., Black hair, brown eyes.

41. VAKSHI, Inbal: NADDIS negative aka Bella POLLCSON, State of Israel Ministry of Transport License number 7098663 and 036444842, International Student Identity Card number S972-204-775-487, DOB 02/03/1979.

42. ZAGURI, Oshirt: NADDIS negative, 701 S. 21 Ave., 4205, Hollywood, FL 33020, DOB 07/11/1977, 5'6 ", FL DL # Z260-640-77-75 1 -0 ..

43. WEISFELNER, Odfd NADDIS - Negative. (NFI)

44. KEDEM, Guy. NADDIS-Negative. This female left a business card stating EAG-Guy Kedem, European Art Group, Oil Paintings; phone number (720) 581-7076; Fax number (303) 336-7006. The (720) number is unlisted and the (303) number is a fax number for Heritage Creek Apartments, 650 South Dahlia Circle, Denver, Colorado. (NFI)

The following individuals were identified by the Ft. Meyers, Florida Resident Office (# 45-48):

45. MEIRAV, Zwaig, NADDIS - Negative. w / f, thin build, short long dark hair, DOB: 2/9/76, US VISA control # 20003205620012, Israeli passport 97831088

46. MACHBUBI, Hilda, NADDIS - Negative. w / f DOB: 5/4/79, US VISA control # 2000397210011, Israeli passport # 6530284, FL ID # M211-320-79-664-0

47. SIMKIN, Nimrod, NADDIS - Negative. w / m, over 6 'tall, curly hair, DOB: 9/2/77, FL DL # S525-620-77-3220

48. KEREN, Inbal, NADDIS - Negative. w / f, DOB: 7/17/79, US VISA control # 20001710300009, Israeli passport # 6082073

The following individuals were identified by the Richmond, Virginia District Office (# 49-54):

49. KEDEM, Eran, NADDIS - Negative. w / m, Israel, dob 10/15/75, 5'11 ", 1601bs., 12990 SW 74th St., Pine Crest, FL, Israeli ID 4031820079, Israeli driver's license # 651007

50. PERLAS, Limor NADDIS - Negative. (NFI)

51. ASE, Shiri NADDIS - Negative. (NFI).

52. KEMETCH, Omit, aka KIMCHY, Ornit, NADDIS - Negative. w / f, dob 02/04/74, passport 96814521

53. MER, Shmrt NADDIS - Negative. (NFI)

54. BOUZAGLO, Kobi, NADDIS - Negative. cellular telephone 1-888-321-6213 (NFI)

The following individuals were identified by the Montgomery, Alabama District Office:

55. VALANSI, Marcelo, NADDIS - Negative. dob 11/24/77, Argentina passport # 26316660, 901 SE 1st Ave., # 2, Gainesville, FL., 617 E. University Ave., Gainesville, FL., 1436 Washington Ave., Miami, FL., Registered owner of 1984 GMC Custom Van, Florida tag T11YZX., Argentina DNI26316660 card 4190961, speaks English and Spanish, Tel # (352) 378-1485 (Identified in Paragraph 6)

56. VALANSI, Roberto, NADDIS - Negative. father of Marcelo VALANSI. Salguero 2468, Apartment 15, Buenos Aires (NFI) (Identified in Paragraph 10)

57. VALANSI, Graziela, NADDIS - Negative. mother of Marcelo VALANSI, Salguero 2468, Apartment 15, Buenos Aires (NFI) (Identified in Paragraph 10)

58. SAGES, Ester, NADDIS - Negative. dob 9/30/77, Israeli passport 96470399, Attornet 161, New York City, NY., Hotel Carlton, New York City, NY father of Ester SAGES, (NFI) (Identified in Paragraph 9)

(Identified in Paragraph 6)

59. SAGES, Elyahu NADDIS - Negative. (Deceased),

60. SAGES, Marjalit, NADDIS - Negative. Mother of Ester SAGES (NFI) (Identified in Paragraph 

61. DARDIC, Vanina Erika, NADDIS - Negative. dob 3/5/78, Argentina passport # 10581811, 901 SE 1st Ave., Gainesville, FL. . Argentina DN126473227 card # J8557, speaks English, Hebrew, and Spanish, girlfriend of VALANSI, citizen of Argentina and Israel (Identified in Paragraph 4)

62. DARDIC, Mario, NADDIS Negative. father of Vanina DARDIC (NFI) (Identified in Paragraph 9)

63. COHEN, Judith (maiden name) NADDIS - Negative. mother of Vanina DARDIC (NFI) (Identified in Paragraph 9)

64. GAVISH, Yael NADDIS - Negative. W / F Brown hair, Brown eyes, DOB: Oct 03, 1978. Citz: Israel Passport Number: 5013766 issued 12-03-92, expires 3-12-2002 US Visa number 20001818940002 Class B-1/B-2 issued July 05, 2000 Expires June

28, 2010.

65. BALHAMS, Meirav NADDIS - Negative. W / F Brown hair, Brown eyes, 5'03 "DOB: 10-03-78 Citz: Israel. New York ED Card 4 140-614-039. Address: 354 Paterson Plank Road # 1, Jersey City, NJ 07650

The following individuals were identified by the Orlando DO on May 3, 2001:

66. SEGALOVITZ, Peer - NADDIS Negative, White, male, Nationality: Israeli, DOB: 03-16-1974, POB Israel, Address: 8187 N. University Drive Apt. 4129, Tamarac, FL, entered the US on B-2 class visa on January 17, 2001. Former officer in Israeli Special Forces 605 Battalion. Israeli Military ED # 5087989. Encountered May 3, 2001 at the Orlando DO Occupation: Israeli Art Vendor / Student. (Identified in Paragraph 96)

67. SEGALOVITZ, Dror - NADDIS - Negative. White, Male, Brother of Peer Segalovitz. ADD: Address 8187 N. University Drive, Apt. Nationality: Israel. Identified in Paragraph 98)

68. SABGUNDJIAN, Kathy - NADDIS: Negative. (626) 358-6453 (626) 256-1027

69. SAGIV, Akyuz Shmuel - NADDIS: Negative. White, Male, Israeli Passport # 8710426; DOB: 09-27-1976; POB: Maaloot, Israel; Entered US In New York; PN: 954712-2126. Associate of Peer Segalovitz and Dror Segalovitz. (Identified in paragraph # 99).

The following were identified at the Volk Field ANG Base, Camp Douglas, Wisconsin:

70. WATERMANN, Tsvi NADDIS - Negative, AKA: Watermann, Zvi; white, male, DOB: June 7, 1979; Address: Pri Megadim 36 Mevaseret Zion, Isreal; Israeli Passport # 5728101 expiration date July 20, 2002; US visa class B1/B2 expiration date March 20, 2011; Israeli Ministry of Transport driver's license, number 7046942.

71. KANTOR, Gal Kal NADDIS - Negative. white, male, DOB: Sep 08, 1975, Address: Kibbuts Eilon NO Western Galilee, Israel 22845; Israeli Passport 8261507 expiration date of Oct 20, 2004; US B1/B2 visa, control number 19993358160012, expiration date of Nov 30, 2009 .

The following were identifed at Tinker AFB, Oklahoma:

72. OHANA, Yaron NADDIS - Negative. DOB: 02-04-78; POB: Haifa, Israel; Passport Number: 8421721 US Visa Number: 42252049.

73. KALFON, Ronen NADDIS - Negative. DOB: 04-13-76; POB: Haifa, Israel Passport Number: 8168262; US Visa Number: 3 5966019.

74. COHEN, Zeev NADDIS - Negative. DOB: 03-26-78; POB: Haifa, Israel, Passport Number: 5524033: US Visa Number: 33331965.

75. TOPAZ, Naor NADDIS - Negative DOB: 06-08-77; POB: Haif, Israel Passport Number: 8081705; US Visa Number: 33306515.

The following were identified by the Euless, TX Police Department on January 2nd, 2001, (refer to page 10):

76. LIFSHITZ, Gilad, NADDIS - Negative. W / M, DOB'09 / 17/1978

77. YANAY, Betzalel, NADDIS - Negative. W / M, DOB 09/04/1978

78. BITON, MoriN Miryam, NADDIS - Negative. W / F; DOB 07/14/1980

79. SASSON, Dana, NADDIS - Negative. W / F, DOB 08/10/1980

80. TOUYZ, Keren, NADDIS - Negative. W / F, DOB 08/20/1978

81. TZOR, Noam, NADDIS - Negative. previous owner of 1GAHG39K5SF112662, a 1995 Chev / Spt owned by Gilad LIFSHITZ of 7535 N. Beltline Rd, APt 316, Irving, Texas 75062.

82. ROTEM, Sharon, NADDIS - Negative. described as a white male, DOB 03 -12-77, Israeli passport number 7948317, street address: 6023 Moshe Dayan, Holon, Israel.

83. MAIMON, Maya, NADDIS - Negative. Nationality: Israel. Israeli passport number as 5467894, US B1/B2 visa, DOB 26Dec1978, Issue Date: 18Oct2000, Expiration Date: 15Oct2010.

84. BADIHI, Nofar, NADDIS - Negative. Nationality Israel. Israeli passport number 5640993, DOB 21/03/1979 (sic), Place of Birth: Israel, date of issue: 05/12/1993, date of expiry (sic): 04/12/1995; US Visa BI/B2, issueDate: 05Jul 1996, ExpiryDate: 02JUL2006.

85. MARABOTTO, Marco NADDIS - Negative. Airline tickets were found reflecting the travel of Maya MAIMON and Marco MARABOTTO from DFW airport to Albuquerque, NM via Delta flight 2238 on March 24, 2001. Each ticket also reflected Delta flight 1944 from Las Vegas to DFW on April 1, 2001.

86. FERNANDEZS, Marco, NADDIS - Negative aka Marco Antonio FERNANDEZ De Castro Marabotto, DOB 13Apr1977, passport number 99390039611, Issuing State: Mexico; place of birth: Mexico, date of issue: 16Jul1999, expiration Date: l6Jul2000.

87. REGEV, Gadi, NADDIS - Negative described as DOB: 17Dec1975, Nationality: Israel, passport number 5454338, vis, issuing post: Tel 10334 Sandra Lynn Dr., Dallas, TX 75228. DOB 05-27-1977, commercial database shows that ARTZI is the owner of a 1993 Plymouth Acclaim, a type: B1/B2Texas plate: J75FYB, date registered 08/21/2000, expiration Date: 07/31/2001

89. SUSI, David, NADDIS Negative DOB 01/09/1975, boyfriend of Maya MAIMON

The following were identified by I & NS - Dallas:

90. ELDAD, Dahan, NADDIS - Negative. W / M Israeli, add: Oak IEH Apts. 1913 Estrada Parkway, # 228, Irving, TX. Arrested by I & NS March 26 2001. (Identified in paragraph 39)

91. AFRICANO-Leon, Elsa Beatriz, NADDIS - Negative. W / F Nationality: Colombia Add: Oak Hill Apts. 1913 Estrada Parkway, # 228, Irving, TX. Arrested by I & NS March 26, 2001. (Identified in paragraph 39)

92. LIVNI, Eran, NADDIS - Negative. W / M Israeli Add: Oak Hill Apts. 1913 Estrada Parkway, # 228, Irving, TX Arrested by I & NS March 26, 2001. (Identified in paragraph 40)

93. OFEK, Aran, NADDIS - Negative. W / M Israeli, ADD: Oak Hill Apts. 1913 Estrada Parkway, # 259, Irving, TX., Father is 2-star general in Israeli Army. Arrested by I & NS March 26, 200 1. (Identified in paragraph 40)

94. GAL, Michal, NADDIS - Negative. W / F, Israeli, DOB 08/10/1979, POB Afula, Israel, INS A 75-894-941, ADD: Oak Hill Apts. 1913 Estrada Parkway, 4259, Irving, TX, Alt add.: 22 Palisade Terrace, Edgewater, NJ 01020 Tel: (201) 224-0797 Arrested by I & NS March 26, 2001. (Identified in paragraph 40)

95. GAVRIEL, Noam, NADDIS - Negative. Nationality: Israel (Identified in paragraph 40)

96. KRITZMAN, Netta, NADDIS - Negative. Nationality: US Citizen (Identified in paragraph 40)

97. BAER, Ophir, NADDIS - Negative. W / K DOB 11/11/1956, Nationality: Israel, employed by AMDOCS, Ltd., Add: 7845 La Cabeza Drive, Dallas, TX 75248, former add: 1125 East Campbell Rd., Richardson, TX, Tel: (972 ) 392-0473 & (214) 576-5741, SSN: 627-70-0979 - (Identified in paragraph 42)

98. AMDOCS, Limited., NADDIS - Negative. add: 1390 Timberlake Manor Parkway, Chesterfield, MO, Tel: (314) 821-3242 (Identified in paragraph 43)

99. DOTAN, Boaz, NADDIS - Negative. 23 Abba Hillel, St. Ranat Gan, Israel, TX president of AMDOCS, Ltd. (Identified in paragraph 43)

100. WHITMAN, Beverly A., NADDIS - Negative. SSN: 400-88-4097, Treasurer of AMDOCS, Ltd. (Identified in paragraph 43)

101. CHRISTOFFEL, Gregory, NADDIS - Negative. SSN: 389-52-850, Secretary of AMDOCS, Ltd. (Identified in paragraph 43)

102. MOSHE, Eran, NADDIS - Negative. Israeli, I & NS A 75-894-459, averted by I & N on 03/26/2001, occup. Israeli art student (Identified in paragrph 44)

103. VAINSHTEIN, Julia, NADDIS - Negative. W / F Israeli, DOB 11/12/1978, POB: Russia, arrived DFW on 03/27/2001, Assoc: Michael CALMANOVIC (Identified in paragraph 46)

104. BORENSTEIN, Dilka, NADDIS - Negative. Israeli, DOB 03/15/1979, POB: Israel, former Israeli Military Intelligence Officer, Assoc: Michael CALMANOVIC (Identified in paragraph 46)

105. NAVAR, Ofir, NADDIS - Negative. Israeli, DOB 09/02/1979, POB: Israel, former Israeli Military Demolition / Explosive ordnance specialist (Identified inparagraph 46)

106. CALMANOVIC, Michael, NADDIS - Negative. W / M, Israeli, DOB 09/06/1-975, POB: Israel, registered owner of TX: L44-CVD, add: 3575 N. Beltline Rd., Apt. 316, Irving, TX., Alt. add: 312 Rochelle Rd., Irving, TX, alt. add: 1103 Hidden Ridge # 3018, Irving, TX alt. Add: 1913 Estrada Parkway, Irving, TX 75061, alt. add: 11012 Ventura Blvd., Studio City, CA 91604 Tel: (214) 882-5196, alt, add: 319 S. 177 Place, 4201, Seattle, WA 98148 Tel: (206) 244-7705, Tel: (214) 882-5196 / (214) 837-3574 / (469) 446-1248 (214) 837-5996 (214) 876 -1235 (217) 837-2056 former Israeli electronic intercept officer. Arrested by I & NS on April 4th, 2001, Posted $ 50K bond, (Identified in paragraph 46)

107. SIMON, Itay, NADDIS - Negative. W / M, Israeli, DOB 02/27/1978, POB: Israel, former Israeli military, add: 1103 Hidden Ridge # 3018, Irving, TX, alt add: California Associate of Michael Calmanovic. Arrested by I & NS April 4, 2001 for violation of status, posted $ 50,000 bond. (Identified in paragraph 50)

108. LNU, Gilad, NADDIS - Negative. Tel: (214) 882-5196 (214) 876-1235 (Identified in paragraph 50)

109. LNU, Roy, NADDIS - Negative. Tel: (214) 837-3574 (Identified in paragraph 50) [39]

110. LNU, Mosh, NADDIS - Negative. Tel: (469) 446-1248 (Identified in paragraph 50)

111. LNU, Gil, NADDIS - Negative. Tel: (214) 837-5996 (Identified in paragraph 50)

112. LNU, Gasaf, NADDIS - Negative. Tel: (217) 837-2056 (Identified in paragraph 50)

113. ENGEL, Yoni, NADDIS - Negative. W / K DOB 09/14/1979, POB: Israeli Citizen, Israel, former company commader in Israeli military, arrived DFW on 03/28/2001, arrested by I & NS, St. Louis, MO on April 4th, 2001 (Identified in paragraph 51)

114. DAGAI, Yotam, NADDIS - Negative. DOB 04/06/1978, POB: Israeli Citizen, Israel, arrested by I & NS, St. Louis, MO on April 4th, 2001, arrived DFW on 03/28/2001. (Identified in paragraph 51)

115. ALROEI, Or, W / M DOB 08/08/1978, POB: Israeli Citizen, Israel, visited DEA St. Louis on 04/04/2001, Had Tel: (214) 882-5196 in his possession, Associate of Michael CALMANOVIC & Gil LNU. (Identified in paragraph 51)

116. RABINOVITZ, Eli, NADDIS - Negative. W / M, DOB 03/27/1979, US passport E3701329518, 5'6 ", Aviv, issue Date: 05Nov1998, expiration Date: 04Nov2008

88. ARTZI, Eyal, NADDIS - Negative Texas DL 19554509, and an expiration date of 06-27-07. address: 175 lbs., brown hair (Identified in paragraph 51)

117. ADESA Golden Gate, NADDIS - Negative. add: 6700 Stevenson Blvd., Fremont, CA, registered owner of CA: 3LVAO1P (Identified in paragraph 51)

118. SADAN, Ben, NADDIS - Negative, W / M Israeli, approx. 24 yoa, Tel: (214) 562-1110, driver of Israeli art students encountered April 4, 2001 in St. Louis, MO.

119. BEN DOR, Tomer, NADDIS - Negative. W / M Israeli, 'DOB 08/24/1975, occup: Computer software engineer, employer: NICE, former Israeli military officer for patriot missile defense (Identified in paragraph 55)

120. GLIKMAN, Marina, NADDIS - Negative. W / F Nationality: Israel, DOB 12/15/1972 (Identified in paragraph 53)

121. AKIVA, Ronen, associate of Marina GLIKMAN, occup: computer program employer: RETALIX, former Israeli military officer (Identified in paragraph 55)

122. RETALIX, USA, NADDIS - Negative. add: 8081 Royal Ridge Parkway, Irving, TX, formerly known as Point of Sale, Limited. (Identified in paragraph 55).

123. DOR, Hillel, NADDIS - Negative. W / M Israeli, DOB 04/06/1971. Associate of Marina GLIKMAN (Identified in paragraph 55)

124. MILLER, Zeev, NADDIS - Negative. W / M Israeli, DOB 09/04/1971, occup: student / software engineer, employer: RETALIX Israel (Identified in paragraph 55).

125. SHAKED, Barry, NADDIS - Negative, CEO of RETALIX (Identified in paragraph 55).

The list paretethi as just given to the public.

The Israeli agents - as demonstrated - were active in groups of 4 to 8 people .... and arrested before, after and during the 9/11/2001.



The conclusions are yours!



http://gr.europanetwork.org/?p=30461 




Germany False Flag Forecast, Summer 2011



Abu-Suleyman10:14 AMNo comments





 'This way is the direct way to Zion (Jerusalem), home of our massa!' Next step for Israel's pax talmudica, known as the NWO, is to take power from Washington. The satanic ceremony of 'transfer of power' will take place during the Olympic Games in London (First New Zion) in 2012. Before, Israel has to eliminate any other challenging 'chosen people' (Japanese, German). Then Israel will eliminate all the representatives of the other monotheist religions, pope included, to make sure that nobody will challenge Israel in 2017.

By Captain Eric H. May, Iconoclast Intelligence and  Abu Salem Sofyan, Islamic Intelligence



FRIDAY, 7/1/11 — European nations are melting into European regions, which are melting into the European Union. The EU is an attempt to reforge the Roman Empire, with its imperial incursions and occupations along North Africa and across the Middle East. There are differences, of course, the most ironic of which is that the former problem province of Judea is now in charge. It’s not a novelty, though: the Roman Empire was once governed by Northeast Mediterranean Greece, much as it is now governed by Southeast Mediterranean Israel.







It’s absurd to talk about empire without imperialism, or vice versa. Considering this, it’s hardly surprising that the New Roman Empire is invading the Old Carthaginian Empire in North Africa, in a replay of the Third Punic War. The Old Roman Empire controlled all the lands surrounding the Mediterranean, and called it mare nostrum (our sea). In light of its increasing militarization, we should expect that the New Roman Empire will try to do the same.



The program hasn’t changed in two millennia. Instigators and invaders, conquerors and collaborators, have always claimed that they were helping the people they were plundering. They have always terrorized populations to get at the partisans, whom they always call terrorists. It’s a tried-and-true policy that filled Caesar’s commentaries two thousand years ago, just as it fills mainstream media reportage today. In both cases it’s propaganda, of course, requiring some reading between the lines to get the truth. Even that is unchanged. The best book on the fall of a republic into an empire is still The Annals of Tacitus. which anticipates and analyzes our travails today.



Across the Atlantic Ocean from the European Union is the United States, which has set the standard for post-9/11 Global War Globalization with much instigation and many invasions. The foremost goal of globalism/imperialism on both sides of the Atlantic is the unification of Europe and America into Euramerica, which will be nourished by regional resources from:


The Pacific Islands
Indochina
India
Southwest Asia
The Middle East
Africa
South America


Euramerica has long been an occult objective of national secret services and the international secret societies behind them. The elder Bush, like his son a member of the elitist Skull and Bones secret society, heralded “a new world order” (Euramerica) in a speech to the U.S. Congress before the First Gulf War:


The New World Order, 9/11/90

“We stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our objective of a new world order can emerge, a new era, freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace.”


The younger Bush energized his father’s vision exactly eleven years later, with the New Pearl Harbor of 9/11/01. Shortly afterward, he delivered a bellicose speech at the United Nations, which echoes loud and clear today:



The Global War on Terror, 11/10/01
“Every civilized nation here today is resolved to keep the most basic commitment of civilization. We will defend ourselves and our future against terror and lawless violence. In the Second World War, we learned there is no isolation from evil, and we resolved that the aggressions and ambitions of the wicked must be opposed early, decisively and collectively before they threaten us all. That evil has returned, and that cause is renewed.”

A decade later it’s high time for 9/11/2B, a codename for the next 9/11, which (we are told) will likely be nuclear. Before attacking Libya, NATO changed it’s 60-year mission of Cold War defense to Global War offense, thus giving emerging Euramerica an unpopular policy in need of a provocation to justify it. In the absence of a legitimate one, an illegitimate one must be conceived. Bastard wars, fathered by persons unknown or unnamed, are not the exception but the rule in history. Nietzsche’s diabolical dictum that a good war justifies any cause was shocking to the Victorian Era bourgeoisie, but familiar to the pestilent people who are the makers and masters of war.

Germany is the heart of Mitteleuropa, which makes it the heart of the European Union. It’s a logical location for 9/11/2B, and an especially tempting target for Zionists, who have a long and creative memory of German persecution. The same religion of revenge was responsible for the invasion of its ancient conqueror and captor, Babylon, in 2003:



White Man’s Burden, Ha’aretz, 4/5/03

“The belief in war against Iraq, that ardent faith, was disseminated by a small group of 25 or 30 neoconservatives, almost all of them Jewish, almost all of them intellectuals, people who are mutual friends and cultivate one another and are convinced that political ideas are a major driving force of history.”

Since 9/11 Germany has followed the US lead into the Global War and the police-state policy that comes with it. The result has been the greatest expansion of German government powers since the Third Reich. The restructured and restrictive nation is now fully committed to both the official recollection of 9/11 and the official anticipation of 9/11/2B. Informed sources, speaking on condition of anonymity, tell us that two years ago the Angela Merkle government was helping to prepare a WMD attack in Western Europe. Al Qaeda in Islamic Maghreb, a contrived French-Algerian-Israeli front organization, was to be blamed.


Involved in the false flag conspiracy were:

Andrew M. Warren, head of the CIA in Algeria. He wrote The People of the Veil, a propaganda publication casting altruistic Americans against murderous Muslims.
Algerian military secret services (DRS). It operates under the guidance of French-Israeli dual citizens.
The Russian Jewish Mafia. It was to smuggle nuclear material to the Algerian DRS.
German secret services, controlled by German-Jewish dual citizens. Their arrests in 2008 for bombing Kosovo proved that the Merkle regime is quite willing to execute false flag operations.


After years of studying attempted and actualized false flag attacks, we have learned that almost all are contingency plans built into military and police terror training exercises, unsuspected by most participants. In the United States terror exercise participants are told what they should do if the exercise scenario goes live by occurring in the real world. It’s common for false flags to be delayed, but not defused. Once a target is prepared it is permanently targeted, and aborted attempts against it are evaluated in after-action analysis.
A 2011 WMD false flag attack against Germany would surely involve US, Israeli and German secret services, operating in tandem with Mossad Muslims who will take the blame.

The most likely means of delivery are:


Cars and trucks, which can reach everywhere.
Riverboats, which can reach interior cities.
Transport ships, which can reach seaports.


The most likely targets are:

Berlin, Germany’s largest city and cultural center, capital of both Unified Germany and the Third Reich.
Hamburg, Germany’s second largest city and largest port, the most likely place for a seaborne attack.
Munich, Germany’s third largest city, host of the 1972 Olympics, and the birthplace of National Socialism.


The most likely dates are:

7/20 – 7/22: The first date is memorable for the German Officers Coup of 1944, the second for the Israeli terror bombing of the King David Hotel in 1948. 7/22, King David Day, is still celebrated by Israelis.
9/9 – 9/11: An unreported fact about 9/11/01 is that it occurred on the fourth anniversary of the 9/11/97 dedication of the New York holocaust museum. Berlin’s holocaust museum opened on 9/9/01, two days before the New Pearl Harbor, and will be marking its tenth anniversary this year.
9/22 – 9/25: Benedict XVI, the “Panzer Pope” who served in the WWII Wehrmacht, will visit Germany, and will attend a massive rally in Berlin’s Olympiastadion, officially identified as a false flag target in the recent filings of German attorney Torsten van Geest. 9/22 will be the anniversary of the first successful Israeli nuke detonation in 1979.


The most controversial idea in our article is that Israel, through dual-agents (sayanim), is in charge both of Globalism and the Global War used to advance it. Our simple defense against any accusation against us of anti-Semitism is that the truth hurts. The 2003 article EU Opinion Poll: Israel Is World’s Most Dangerous Nation showed that Europe was still sane when America had become Israel’s insane Goy Golem, rampaging self-righteously against Middle East Muslims. At the same time, Indonesian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad delivered a scathing speech at the 10th Islamic Summit Conference, in which he accused International Jewry of ruling the world by proxy. The same opinion is preeminent even in the Far East, according to the 2010 EU Times article, The Jewish Conspiracy in Asia, which cities The Protocols of Zion as the primary source of the worldwide worldview.

Truth is often painful, but fear of facing it is perilous. This is especially true for Germany, where thought control is exercised by thought crime laws, and conformity is coerced by alien agents. Deutschland erwacht!





* This is the fourth of our False Flag Forecast, Summer 2011 series, which includes Introduction, United States and United Kingdom articles.





(Al-Isra[Chap 17]:verse 4)






“And We gave (clear) warning to the children of Israel in the Book, that twice would they do mischief on the land and be elated with mighty arrogance (And twice would they be punished)!”


Murder, Glastonbury and the Nuclear Nightmare



Abu-Suleyman4:59 AMNo comments



“The Worst Thing That Can Happen” is Real

The Only Question is Timing



By Gordon Duff, 

www.veteranstoday.com
Someday, perhaps soon, a nuclear weapon will destroy a city, America, Europe, it’s only a matter of time.  Behind the scenes, however, the stage is being set and things are in motion.  Intelligence agencies around the world are on it, working but not always optimistic they will succeed.  The problem, of course, is that not all intelligence agencies want to succeed.







Investigations inside Britain have stumbled on a grand conspiracy, one that ties 9/11, the Iraq invasion and even the murder of Princess Diana together.  Nothing of this magnitude has begun in the US or is likely.  Even in Britain, as witnesses come forward and investigators push for broader inquiries, doors are closed, sometimes as with the Derbyshire incident but more often with government sanctioned killings like the murder of Dr. David Kelly and the mysterious death of Robin Cook.





The killings, Cook, Kelly and more, many more,  all seem to circle around arms dealers known for their ties to access to nuclear material and their willingness to broker deals between Israel and such unlikely customers as Iraq or North Korea.  Thus far, only the death of Dr. David Kelly is confirmed to have been a murder tied to one or more of these arms deals.





This week, Tory MP Christopher Shale may well have met a similar fate.  By T. Stokes:


Chairman for West Oxfordshire Tory Party, Christopher Shale was found dead in a toilet cubicle at Glastonbury Festival the day after his interview with the Mail On Sunday was published. Significantly in the interview Shale had criticised his own party for being, as he put it: “voracious”, “grasping” and “always seen to be on the take”.His comments on the economy echoed what many felt, that it could not be coincidence that almost every country in the world was facing economic collapse simultaneously.  Tory leader, Prime Minister Cameron was said to have been furious with this rising star in the party for his forthrightness.





Shale was a big music fan and had friends in pop music, charitable fundraising and banking and coupled with his insider knowledge, his outspokenness posed a potential threat to the establishment.





He regularly received a newsletter from Rwanda, which claimed that grasping voracious moneylenders were breaking-up every country in the world. The newsletter must have made a deep impression on Shale with its references to “grasping and voracious money-grabbers” because he later used these exact terms to describe the Tory Party.





Avon and Somerset police force cover Glastonbury festival and they had a lot of undercover officers working the fields after Shale’s death.





This police force has a better name than most and is less tainted with corruption so gets more public support, and people were soon talking about the death of a popular rising politician.





Like many music festivals drugs are rife, particularly the area around the toilet cubicles with the relative privacy they offer. But with upwards of 200, 000 people at Glastonbury the area around these toilets isn’t salubrious. In fact hygienically it is literally the pits, with the vast number of people using them.





So what was 56-year-old Christopher Shale doing there, particularly when he had a luxury motor home nearby with its own private shower and toilet?





To forgo his private toilet facilities to use one of these dirty public cubicles just does not add up.
Did this politician with his plans to modernise the Tory Party speak out to loudly and pay with his life?





The family of Christopher Shale say they have been told it is almost certain that he died of a heart attack, despite a pathologist being unable to determine an official cause of death.
Just like Robin Cook, who opposed arms sales and the invasion of Iraq and who died of heart failure while walking in the Scottish hills, despite his never having had heart problems.
From the way Christopher Shale died experts can tell who did it because of what the intelligence community call ‘tells’; tell-tale signs or signatures that distinguish a murder made to look like death by misadventure: like Robin Cook, Dr David Kelly and now maybe Christopher Shale too.





Lets hope the Avon & Somerset police force are as good as their reputation and investigate this properly.


Yesterday, a British politician, Christopher Shale,  died in an outdoor toilet at the Glastonbury Festival in Britain.  This is a yearly “Woodstock’ type event that draws hundreds of thousands, U2 was only one of the headliners but the real story is usually mud and traffic.  I have been stuck getting out of Glastonbury for endless hours.  Glastonbury was the backdrop, the death will be a minor event.  In truth, it is not, it is part of a pattern of mysterious deaths tied to a horror story.



YouTube - Veterans Today -







Missing nuclear weapons.



Coincidentally, the same cast of characters are probably, more than probably, responsible for the murder of Princess Diana.  She didn’t die over Dodi Al Fayed or Islam, nothing so conspiratorial.  She simply made it harder to sell landmines, those things that blow the legs off small children but make hundreds of millions in profits for folks who can make your car crash, help you commit suicide as with Dr. David Kelly or make you show up dead in a probably filthy public toilet when your million dollar motor home is only a few short yards away.





Last week, journalist Peter Eyre wrote an article on this two decade old story that still threatens the lives of millions.  Eyre talks of British politics, murder, corruption, things Christopher Shale had been looking into.  Shale didn’t last very long.  From Eyre’s article:




Let’s refresh our minds about what happened in 1989 when a young Tory researcher, David Cameron (under the apron strings of Maggie Thatcher), went to South Africa on a sanctions-busting all-expenses-paid trip (paid by ARMSCOR) to Pellindaba, a nuclear weapons facility. David Cameron was accompanied by Sir Kenneth Warren and the purpose of the trip was to purchase three, battlefield ready 20kt nuclear bombs that the Conservatives wanted to use on Saddam in the event he did not toe the line.





Under the UN radar, South Africa, with the help of Israel, developed ten bombs and test fired one at Prince Edward Island to the South of the country. This left nine weapons that caused South Africa, US, UK and Israel great concern as they did not want them to fall into the hands of the next black regime.





The plan was to ship the entire load to Chicago for decommissioning, but Maggie Thatcher had other ideas and so just before she left office she signed an Urgent Operational Requirement (UOR) document that listed them as being three cylinders! They were prepared and shipped in standard 20-foot sea containers from Durban to Oman without any security. There was a hidden observation window so that the core temperature could be checked as required.





The deal was arranged privately using British taxpayers money and involving arms dealer John Bredenkamp with the assistance of Sir Mark Thatcher and many high profile politicians. £17.8 million was siphoned off and went into the Tory Party Election Fund; which was exposed by the Labour Party in Parliament by Lord Doug Hoyle and Margaret Beckett MP and is listed in Hansard June 22 1993 from Column 197.





The nuclear bombs arrived in Oman and were put into an insecure compound and checked by Dr. David Kelly who had the responsibility to look after the weapons and check that they were in good condition prior to the release of the money. (So you see dear Dr. Kelly knew too much). Some time later the three weapons were stolen by the same arms dealer, John Bredenkamp, and sold on the black market. It was believed that these weapons found their way to Iraq, but were then moved into Syria in three ambulances as they were highly mobile.


The investigation, now a massive coverup which includes, not only murders in Britain but a secret motive for staging a series of building demolitions known as “9/11″ pointed at Iraq.  When it pointed at Syria, as explained by Eyre, it was buried.  We will get to that in a minute.  These missing bombs have been writing history for years, it never stops.





Sources have tracked them, not to Syria but to Israel and from there, one went to North Korea where it was exploded May 25, 2009.  Who would sell a nuclear weapon, one build by Israel and South Africa, one bought by Britain, one stolen and moved, if we believe the stories, from country to country, to North Korea?



A more important question, where are the others?  How many others?  Two more of these are missing.  A year ago, at least one was reported inside the United States.

The Delta Force was sent to Indiana to recover it from a warehouse.  It may have been found, we hope so.  However, we do have multiple confirmations of the reports and the search.  A local news channel showed up and filmed it of all things.



YouTube - Veterans Today -



From the Daily Telegraph:


Friends say Mr Shale suffered a massive heart attack. But Michael Eavis, the festival organiser, hinted at something more sinister when he suggested to journalists that it was a suicide.
Speaking at a press conference he said: “Apparently, I’m told it was a suicide situation in the early hours of this morning. He was in the Winnebago area and he was found on the other side of the site. It is very, very sad.”





The suggestion of suicide was quickly ruled out by police sources and friends of Mr Shale.
Tributes to Mr Shale came from the highest offices of Government. Mr Cameron said he was “devastated” and described Mr Shale as “a rock”.





Andrew Mitchell, the International Development Secretary, knew Mr Shale from trips they had been on in Rwanda as part of a project to help young Africans prepare for work.
He said: “He was a wonderful man whose zest for life and love of his family and friends coloured everything he did. For his close friends his company was like a freshly opened bottle of champagne. I can hardly bear to accept that he will not be with us.”





Mr Shale was a veteran of the festival. Although he and his family camped off the site, he would buy tickets for the VIP area each year so that they could enjoy the facilities.




http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/07/01/murder-glastonbury-and-the-nuclear-nightmare/

Terrorisme d'etat: Les autorités britanniques interdisent à l'équipe de défense de Cheikh Raed Salah de le visiter



Abu-Suleyman7:36 AMNo comments









Londres – CPI

www.palestine-info.info 







L'avocat, Zahi Nujeidat, porte-parole du mouvement islamique dans les territoires palestiniens occupée en 1948, qui se trouve actuellement à Londres au sein de l'équipe de défense de Cheikh Raed Salah, a déclaré que les autorités britanniques ont émis, hier après-midi, le samedi 2/7, une décision d'interdire l'équipe de défense de Cheikh Raed Salah de lui rendre visite jusqu'au 11 juillet prochain.







Il a ajouté que les autorités britanniques ont refusé son entrée ainsi que celle de l'avocat Hassan Tabajah pour rendre visite au Cheikh Raed Salah, où elles les ont informés de la décision soudaine.





L'équipe de défense de Cheikh Raed Salah a publié un communiqué condamnant cette mesure illégale, considérant qu'elle s'inscrit dans le cadre de "la persécution politique contre le Cheikh Salah et une soumission aux pressions exercées sur les autorités britanniques".




Commentant cette mesure, Nujeidat a déclaré que "cet acte irresponsable et incontrôlé des autorités britanniques démontre la grande confusion du gouvernement britannique qui s'attendait, après la décision d'arrêt et d'expulsion, à entendre le Cheikh dire "Yes Sir" (Oui monsieur), mais le Cheikh les a surpris par son insistance sur la poursuite juridique, et au cours de ces 4 derniers jours, les autorités britanniques se sont exposées aux critiques locales et mondiales, ce qui les a forcés à commettre une erreur après l'autre".



Nujeidat a également confirmé que la décision de demander la libération de Cheikh Raed Salah sera réalisée dans les prochains jours.

Confirmed: China helped Iran to clone Russian S-300/400 radar-defense system. Now, the only way to start a general war is that Israel detonates her nuke bombs in Europe or the US and blame Pakistan, Iran or even Al Qaeddafi



Abu-Suleyman1:54 AMNo comments



Update : British Zionist shills are hijacking my computers and mobile phones and land line. This is related to the latest article linking the death of Christopher Shale to an Israeli nuclear terror attack in the UK and Europe. This is a warning to the GHCQ. Whether you stop immediately your hijacking or you 'll have to repay millions for your servers and for the damaged caused to me using my ID, credit cards details. You'd better be cooperative on this one, I won't be surprised if the computers you are using in Japan, Brazil, Moscow, Costa Rica, Atlanta will be burnt with your hacker kids networks before the end of the week.   You want play ?! Let's play ! 



AS

 

 IRGC Ghadir radar system operational 
Iran launched 14 surface-to-surface missiles, including Zelzal, Shahab-1, Shahab-2 and Shahab-3 on June 28, 2011.
A top Iranian commander says the Ghadir radar system with a range of 1,100 kilometers in radius and a height of 300 kilometers has become operational in the country for the first time.






 Iranian cloned s-300 on parade



“The Ghadir radar has been designed and manufactured to discover air targets, radar-evading planes, cruise missiles, ballistic missiles and satellites at low orbits,” Commander of the Aerospace Division of Iran's Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) Amir Ali Hajizadeh said on Wednesday, Fars news agency reported.
After the IRGC unveiled underground ballistic missile silos on the first day of the Great Prophet 6 military maneuvers on Monday, the Ghadir radar system also become operational, the commander went on to say.
The Islamic Republic began the Great Prophet 6 drills on Monday.





On the first day of the exercises, Iran unveiled underground missile silos and fired Fateh (Conqueror)-110 missiles.  On Tuesday, Iran successfully launched 14 surface-to-surface missiles, including Zelzal (Temblor), Shahab-1, Shahab-2 and Shahab-3.

Five Shahab missiles, including four medium-range and one long-range, as well as 9 Zelzal missiles were launched.  Iran says the Great Prophet 6 maneuver has defensive objectives and will be staged with the message of "peace and friendship."

SF/MMA/HRF Wed Jun 29, 2011 8:12AM

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/186733.html

Share: 




 


Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook







Related Posts:




L'invasion et la recolonisation du Maghreb par la France-Israel et ses harkis locaux



Abu-Suleyman9:23 AMNo comments


L’héritage militaire français

Salima GHEZALI

La Nation.info

4 Juillet 2011




Depuis 1962 c’est la première fois que l’Algérie célèbre un 5 Juillet alors que des avions de l’armée française bombardent un pays voisin. Les bombardements contre la Libye ne peuvent pas davantage relever de la guerre humanitaire que ne relevait de la mission civilisatrice l’expédition coloniale française en Algérie. Pourtant la communauté internationale a accepté le principe de ce type d’intervention au nom de la défense des civils. Un bref coup d’oeil sur l’importance de la protection des civils dans la tradition militaire française rend urgent un débat.







Les fondamentaux de la guerre d’Algérie.





Il ya quelques mois, un jeune Lieutenant de l’armée française en partance pour l’Afghanistan répondait à un journaliste qui lui demandait ce que lui et ses hommes allaient faire là bas : « Nous allons appliquer les fondamentaux de la guerre d’Algérie.»

Déjà peu populaire au sein de la population algérienne, la guerre américaine en Afghanistan venait, dans le sillage d’un journal télévisé français, de perdre quelques uns de ses rares supporters. Par ailleurs, l’apparition des avions de combat français dans le ciel maghrébin et les bombardements qu’ils effectuent au-dessus de la Libye ont constitué au sein de l’opinion la plus large le franchissement d’une ligne rouge symbolique. L’armée française en guerre, ses pratiques et sa doctrine, sont un paradigme majeur dans la grammaire intime des peuples qui ont eu à en faire l’expérience.





Bugeaud, Galieni, Lyautey…





Que peut signifier d’un point de vue algérien, cette « normalisation » de la doctrine militaire colonialiste française dans laquelle les Bugeaud, Galieni, Lyautey et autres Galula tiennent une place non négligeable ? De quelle manière nous sommes-nous préparés à cette sortie française du « traumatisme de la guerre d’Algérie » ? Le citoyen ordinaire, trop occupé à survivre et à se demander quels types de rapports établir avec sa propre armée n’en sait rien. Les débats qui portent sur l’armée sont, comme les débats de manière générale, rares et de plus frappés de suspicion. Pourtant à observer la manière avec laquelle la France organise1 sa « sortie du traumatisme de la guerre d’Algérie » on se rend compte de l’urgence qu’il ya pour nous de débattre. De doctrine militaire aussi. On le sait, dans une société politisée, organisée et démocratique les questions de doctrine militaire ne sont pas l’apanage de la seule oligarchie de l’armée. C’est pourtant bien loin des villes et des montagnes occidentales et démocratiques que les armées de ces pays vont faire la guerre depuis plusieurs décennies. Mais en démocratie, le débat permet de mettre des garde-fous qui protègent la société, ses institutions et son Etat quand bien même c’est au loin que se déroulent les conflits.

Curieusement, c’est dans les sociétés où prennent place ces guerres, pensées et discutées ailleurs, que le débat est interdit. Les armées de ces pays dont l’insertion se fait, d’une manière ou d’une autre, dans les logiques sécuritaires globales ont au mieux pour tout bagage doctrinal un héritage symbolique.2



Au service des dictatures sud-américaines.





La France en a fini  avec le traumatisme de la guerre d’Algérie, plus discrètement, mais aussi surement que l’Amérique a surmonté le traumatisme de la guerre du Viet- Nam. Les américains ne sont probablement pas étrangers à cette « résilience  militaire ». A peine sortis de la guerre d’Algérie, les officiers français spécialistes de la guerre « contre-révolutionnaire » ont trouvé à s’employer en conseillant les dictatures sud américaines :
« Dans les années 1970 et 1980, les dictatures militaires du cône sud de l’Amérique latine ont férocement réprimé leurs opposants, utilisant à une échelle sans précédent les techniques de la « guerre sale » : rafles indiscriminées, torture systématique, exécutions extrajudiciaires et « disparitions », escadrons de la mort…C’est en enquêtant sur l’organisation transnationale dont s’étaient dotées ces dictatures le fameux « Plan Condor » que Marie-Monique Robin a découvert le rôle majeur joué secrètement par des militaires français dans la formation à ces méthodes de leurs homologues latino-américains (et en particulier argentins). Des méthodes expérimentées en Indochine, puis généralisées au cours de la guerre d’Algérie, pendant laquelle des officiers théoriseront le concept de  » guerre révolutionnaire « . Dès la fin des années 50, les méthodes de la « Bataille d’Alger  » sont enseignées à l’Ecole supérieure de guerre de Paris, puis en Argentine, où s’installe « une mission militaire permanente française » constituée d’anciens d’Algérie (elle siégera dans les bureaux de l’état-major argentin jusqu’à la dictature du général Videla). De même, en 1960, des experts français en lutte antisubversive, dont le général Paul Aussaresses, formeront les officiers américains aux techniques de la « guerre moderne » qu’ils appliqueront au sud-Viêtnam. »





L’héritage militaire français.

L’enquête de Marie-Monique Robin met au jour le lien entre idéologie, politique et doctrine militaire à proprement parler. L’expérience militaire que les français vont mettre sur le marché mondial de la guerre est une des  plus brutales que l’humanité ait connues mais elle est de plus inapte à résoudre les problèmes là où elle s’est présentée en recours : Un général argentin parmi ceux qui appliquèrent scrupuleusement les « enseignements » français déclare quelques années plus tard : « … sans doute que les disparus furent une erreur, si vous comparez avec les disparus d’Algérie3, c’est très différent : c’était finalement les disparus d’une autre nation, les français sont rentrés chez eux et ils sont passés à autre chose ! tandis- qu’ici chaque disparu avait un père, un frère, un oncle, un grand-père qui continuent d’avoir du ressentiment contre nous, et c’est naturel… »4

Tout aussi grave, alors que son adoption dans les conflits internes laisse des séquelles douloureuses et politiquement difficiles à dépasser, le savoir-faire français ne semble pas avoir profité aux argentins dans la guerre des Malouines où ils subirent une mémorable défaite. « L’expérience historique montre que les responsables qui poussent les forces armées à réprimer leur propre peuple n’ont jamais vaincu un ennemi extérieur et, finalement qu’ils ne servent à rien pour la défense nationale… l’armée avait dépensé toute son énergie pour détruire ses propres bases sociales et nationales… sa défaite (notre défaite) a pour origine quasi-exclusive des facteurs provenant d’une certaine idéologie, entérinée par une doctrine : celle de la guerre antisubversive. »5

L’Amérique latine a payé un prix exorbitant à cette doctrine de la guerre antisubversive avant d’accéder enfin à la démocratie. Une démocratie que les pays occidentaux, oublieux de leurs engagements aux cotés des dictateurs vont désormais prétendre exporter sur tous les continents. Le nouveau mot d’ordre est dorénavant de faire la guerre a ceux qui font la guerre à leur propre peuple, comme Saddam Hussein ou Gueddafi.
Depuis que l’invasion de l’Irak a signé le grand retour des armées occidentales sur des théâtres de guerre arabe, l’expérience française est fortement sollicitée. Mais cette sollicitation ne se fait plus sous la seule forme des « conseillers spéciaux » que l’on cache honteusement. Le retour de « l’héritage militaire français» se fait sur les théâtres de guerres contemporains sur la base, non d’une maitrise des nouvelles technologies de la guerre, mais sur celle d’un vieux savoir faire en matière de  guerre coloniale. Décomplexée, l’armée française articule néanmoins l’expérience historique à son insertion dans les rangs de l’Otan sur plusieurs continents et élabore un discours lisse susceptible de séduire à l’heure de la globalisation.

«Jusqu’à très récemment, l’armée française a évité de parler de « contre-insurrection » refoulant d’un même mouvement le souvenir de l’Algérie et la validité d’un concept ressuscité dans l’urgence par les américains embourbés en Irak. Pourtant son expérience en matière de « guerre révolutionnaire » et de « guerre au sein des populations », pour reprendre une expression aujourd’hui en vogue, est exceptionnellement riche et diverse, peut-être plus que celle d’aucune autre armée européenne (…) des premières aventures coloniales jusqu’aux interventions actuelles, en passant bien entendu par les guerres de décolonisation des années 1950 et 1960, on peut certes identifier des éléments de continuité, tant institutionnels que culturels. Certaines unités militaires en particulier se réclament explicitement de l’héritage colonial et en perpétuent avec fierté les traditions» Lire la suite de l’article d’Etienne de Durand .





1- Ces dernières années on a assisté en France à la publication  d’ouvrages, la production de documentaires et de thèses universitaires sur les méthodes, la doctrine et l’histoire contemporaine de l’armée française.

2- C’est le cas de l’armée algérienne qui se revendique de l’ALN mais l’armée de libération nationale était une armée de résistants ce qui est quelque peu différent d’une armée classique).
3- Les disparus de la guerre d’indépendance, pas ceux des années 90.

4- in Escadrons de la mort, l’ecole française. Page 340.

5- in Escadrons de la mort, l’ecole française. Page 364.

http://www.lequotidienalgerie.org/2011/07/05/lheritage-militaire-francais/




Sarkozy et les israeliens de la DCRI declenchent une guerre civile en Tunisie



Abu-Suleyman4:23 AMNo comments


 VIDEOS: Avertissement au peuple tunisien : La France-Israel veut une guerre civile dans tout le Maghreb de la Mauritanie a l'Egypte et la soumission des Arabes a Israel. 





Les peuples Musulmans du Maghreb doivent comprendre que la police secrete tunisienne n'est rien d'autre que les services francais de la DCRI (ex-DST), sous controle de Bernard Squarcini, agent du mossad, et l'un des emirs franco-israelien d 'Al Qaeda au Maghreb Islamique', un groupe qui n'existe pas en tant que groupe de la Resistance Islamique, mais qui est un enchevetrement de reseaux juifs sionistes de la police francaise et de la mafia governementale francaise au Maghreb et en Afrique. 



Celui qui vient a vous et vous dit que 'Al Qaeda' existe, giflez le! Il travaille pour les services franco-israeliens. Dans le sud tunisien, il existe plusieurs centres franco-israeliens ou ces mercenaires s'entrainaient avec les sefarades marocains et algeriens du Makhzen et du DRS pour la guerre civile en Libye, comme decrite ici au mois de janvier dernier. 






Le Makhzen et le DRS sont controlés par des sefarades, des juifs arabes, ultra-racistes, et dont les reseaux sont des reseaux servant les interets d'Israel dans la region. Ces reseaux sont franc-maconniques, talmudiques et issus du 'Decret Cremieux' de 1880. Comme vous pouvez le constater par vous meme, ce qui vous a été decrit sur ce blog en Janvier 2011 est en cours de realisation. Ce sont les reseaux franc maconniques de sefarades maghrebins qui financent les 'faux groupes islamiques' et ces reseaux sefarades controlent le gouvernement francais, dont la police francaise et toute la DCRI aux mains de juifs haineux d'Algerie et de pieds noirs de Corse qui veulent se venger de leur defaite de 1962. Ils ne font que precipiter la chute du gouvernement francais. 



Ce que les medias tunisiens, marocains, algeriens ne vous diront jamais c'est que le plan israelien de Oded Ynnon de 1982, qui prevoyait la guerre civile dans tous les pays Arabes, le vol et la prise de controle de toutes les resources et richesses, et l'extension des frontieres israeliennes de la Libye, Syrie, Arabie Saoudite, Turquie, Iran est en cours. Qaid Sebsi est un franc-macon au service d'Israel comme Bourguiba et Ben Ali l'etaient, tous formés par les israeliens de France, il est anti-Arabe, anti-Islaam, tout comme la police secrete tunisienne qui prend ses ordres a Levallois Perret, dans les locaux de la DCRI, controlée totalement par Israel. 



Le salut passe par la destruction du systeme colonial bancaire francais, en premier lieu pour mettre le peuple a l'abri de l'inflation, la legalisation immediate de l'argent or et argent metal comme seules et uniques monnaies legitimes, et la creation d'une banque centrale sur le model Icelandais creatrice de monnaie, interdisant l'interet, l'annulation de la dette envers les banques europeenes, americaines. Ensuite des elections peuvent se tenir, tant que ceci n'est pas fait, les israeliens et leur banques americaines, francaises destabiliseront n'importe quel gouvernement legitime mis en place par la decision populaire, car controlant le prix des matieres premieres et pouvant provoquer une hyperinflation et le chaos a tout moment.  



Il y aura de faux attentats AQMI, de 'faux groupes islamiques' sur le model francais des escadrons de la mort des GIAs/AQMI mis en place en Algerie pour voler le gaz et le petrole, ces memes groupes sont en action en Libye en ce moment. L'ambassadeur de France a Tunis et le chef de la police secrete tunisenne, Qaid Sebsi et les generaux tunisiens de l'OTAN, la DCRI, l'ambassade de la CIA a Tunis en sont les perpetrateurs et commanditaires, le but est d'assurer le reigne des reseaux franco-israeliens, talmudo maconniques et la soumission totale a Israel. 



Le report des elections sert ce plan de guerre civile et en meme temps sert la logistique en preparation de l'OTAN pour envahir la Libye des le mois d'octobre 2011, ou les 30 000 soldats retournés d'Afghanistan serviront en Libye. La situation est la meme au Maroc et en Algerie ou la crispation des sefarades ultra racistes de Makhzen et du DRS annoncent leur fin toute proche dans des massacres dont ils sont les seuls responsables.



Voila ou nous en sommes. Ci-dessous deux videos demontrant que le petit peuple tunisien a compris le plan, tout comme le peuple libyen a compris la manoeuvre franco-israelienne.  Les avertissements du Dr Marzouki pour eviter de tomber dedans sur la base de l'experience Algerienne mais aussi Lybienne et Syrienne. Ce qui ne veut pas dire que Al Assad et al Qaeddafi sont legitimes, non ils ne le sont pas, mais l'interet du peuple n'est pas dans une guerre civile pour le compte d'Israel. 



Marzouki est un laic, mais il connait bien l'engeance talmudo-sioniste et a su tres bien lui resister lorsqu'il etait en France, defendant son arabité, et l'identité Musulmane des tunisiens, mais egalement un soutien infaillible a la cause palestinienne ce qu'on ne peut pas dire des franc-macons Qaid Sebsi, Al Mbazaa et consorts et autres faux 'islamologues' de salon qui font de l'Islaam et du Quran la cible a abattre au nom de la soumission a Israel.

Une autre erreure a ne pas repeter est l'utilisation du terme 'islamiste' qui ne veut strictement rien dire en Islaam. C'est un terme maconnique qui permet a la France-Israel de venir massacrer, torturer et voler vos pays. De meme que 'l'etat islamique', ca ne veut rien dire sur la base du Quran et de la Sunnah. Le Khilafa est le seul et unique mode de gouvernance autorisé en Islaam et il inclut tous les droits des musulmans et non-musulmans, croyants ou pas.

'L'etat Islamique' est un tromperie du Dajjal israelien qui souhaite vous endormir et que vous vous entretuez pour des details mineurs, alors qu'ils pillent le pays et le divisent en region ethnico-tribales comme Laurence d'Arabie avait commencé a le faire avant la destruction du Khilafa en 1917... L'etat islamique reste une conception franc-maconne de l'Islaam, et les 'freres' Musulmans lourdement infiltrés en Egypte doivent servir de base pour installer ces types de gouvernements fantoches pour donner l'illusion de l'Islaam et donnner le pouvoir a des minorites qui travaillent pour Israel en secret comme on le voit bien partout dans le monde Arabe, elles vous apparaitront comme Musulmanes comme le traitre de Abdeljalil al Bayad ou l'emir du Qatar, ou encore Belkhadem, Soltani en Algerie, mais ce sont des pantins du systeme et les ennemis les plus acharnés de l'Islaam avec les sefarades racistes d'Al Saud, Al Nahyanes, Al Sabah, M6, le roi de Jordanie, Al Maliki en Iraq etc. On peut ajouter Erdogan et Gul, Al Qaeddafi, Al Assad etc... tous issus du systeme. Les peuples informés auront le dernier mot insha Allah






Erdogan et Gul vendent leurs ames a Israel pour une place dans l'Europe regionalisée sous domination de Tel Aviv



Abu-Suleyman6:40 AM7 comments





 Ces accords secrets ne sont que la confirmation de ce que nous voyons sur cette carte parue en 2006 et le 'nouveau Moyen Orient' vu par Israel.



Accords secrets Turquie - France : Les israeliens de France tentent de reprendre le controle de la Turquie en achetant Erdogan et Gul


Accords secrets 'Juppé - Erdogan', signés en Octobre 2010 a Boukos, et en cours de realisation comme tout le monde peut le voir :





La France à travers son ministre des affaires étrangères, Alain Juppé, a signé des accords secrets a  Boukos avec la Turquie qui demande à adhérer à l'Union européenne, en raison de son rôle important dans le Moyen-Orient.  Seule la France (ndlr: Israel en fait car Juppé, Sarkozy sont des mossadniks, ces accords ont été draftés et validés par Hilary Clinton) a décidé de fournir le soutien nécessaire à l'entrée de la Turquie dans l'Union européenne après une promesse faite par le premier ministre turc de la mise en œuvre des dispositions du présent accord et au profit de l'entrée dans l'Union Européene, entre la Turquie et la France :







1. La France fournit le soutien nécessaire pour la Turquie afin de faciliter son entrée dans l'Union européenne avant la fin de l'année 2012



2. La Turquie est disposée a fournir un soutien à la France sur ses positions stratégiques dans le Moyen-Orient et en particulier au Liban, la Syrie et Israël

3. La Turquie continuera de laisser Israël a poursuivre ses activités militaires en Turquie et de soutenir ses unités militaires.

4. La France à son tour fournira le soutien nécessaire au premier ministre Erdogan aux élections parlementaires à venir (ndlr: victoire de l'AKP en juin 2011), afin de changer la Constitution turque pour servir et preparer le processus d'entrée de ce pays dans l'Union Européenne.

5. La Turquie facilitera le travail de l'opposition syrienne en organisant des réunions de l'opposition syrienne en Turquie et en France, sous la supervision du représentant de l'Union européenne

6. La Turquie est prête à imposer des pressions sur le régime syrien pour diminuer son role et son influence au Moyen-Orient et la Turquie fera passer le rejet du régime d'Al Assad sur les corrompus et sur les processus de changement en cours au Moyen-Orient

7. La Turquie facilitera l'entrée des Syriens déplacés et permettra aux médias français, ou tout autre support allié de retransmettre les faits et evenements des Syriens déplacés demandeur d'asile en Turquie.

8. Permettre à la Turquie de contrôler les régions d'Alep et de Idlib du nord de la Syrie en échange de quoi la France et la Grande-Bretagne contrôleront le reste de l'espace aerien syrien occupé (ndlr: similaire a la Libye)

9. La Turquie ne sera pas réticente à l'établissement d'une base militaire américaine dans l'est de Deir Al-Zour en Syrie et fournira le soutien nécessaire à cette base. 

10. La France, en profitant de son statut dans l'Union européenne,  fera adopter une résolution de l'ONU sur les Kurdes de Turquie et proposera des solutions pour eux, dont la création d'un Etat Kurde dans le nord de l'Irak, sous la supervision directe de la Turquie et la France

11. La France est engagée à utiliser son veto pour garantir les droits de la Turquie qu'elle jugera appropriée, aux frontières entre la Turquie et l'état présumé Kurde, établi dans le nord de l'Irak.

12. Faciliter les opérations commerciales à travers le territoire turc, la Syrie et le Liban, et de ne pas vérifier le contenu des containers français en transit de la Turquie vers la Syrie puis le Liban. (ndlr: acheminement d'armes pour l'invasion au sol de la Syrie). 



13. L'engagement continu de la Turquie au respect de la convention sur les affaires turco-françaises du Liban.

14. La France fournit le soutien nécessaire et inconditionnel a la Turquie sur les questions en suspens entre la Turquie et Chypre.

15. La France donnera à la Turquie 45 milliards d'euros dans les comptes de l'Union européenne pour soutenir les opérations de développement en Turquie, après engagement de la Turquie aux dispositions du présent accord et ces montants seront déboursés par tranches en fonction des obligations remplies par la Turquie aux dispositions de cet accord.
Traduit de l'Arabe et paru au Liban en Novembre 2010, d'une coincidence exceptionnelle avec les evenements qui se sont produit jusque la.  


Sarkozy et Juppé perdront en 2012 si ils disent aux francais, qu'ils ont rendu racistes avec leur haine de l'Islaam, que la Turquie entrera dans l'UE en 2012, mais Aubry finira le travail en bonne soumise a Tel Aviv, encore un signe de la defaite sarkozyste programmée. Les Kurdes et les peuples de la region seront encore utilisés et les grands perdant car permettant aux israeliens de voler le petrole, le gaz et l'eau des iraquiens. Le Kurdistan, nord de l'Iraq, etant aux mains de la famille mafieuse juive sioniste kurde Barzani. 







Le plan israelien de vol et du pillage des resources petrolieres iraquiennes
http://foforum.xooit.com/t2090-Accord-Juppe-Erdogan.htm












7 comments:





Nina said...
Est-ce que c'est possible d'avoir le lien de l'article original? Merci d'avance
6:13 AM


Nina said...
Est-ce que c'est possible d'avoir le lien de l'article original? Merci d'avance
6:14 AM


Abu-Suleyman said...
en arabe ... les services francais l'ont retire du net, comme ils l'ont fait avec l'article sur le financement de sarkozy par qaddafi sur un site syrien... y a un lien en bas, peut etre leur demander si quelqu'un a sauvegarder le texte en arabe
12:01 PM


Abu-Suleyman said...
originellement poste sur ce site http://www.aksalser.com/

en novmebre 2010... et sur pression ... tout de suite enleve
12:34 PM


nicole said...
C'est difficilement imaginable qu'un accord de cette importance puisse ètre publiè sur internet. Le texte original est introuvable.
5:26 AM


Abu-Suleyman said...
parce qu'il n'est plus trouvabl sur le net ... cela renforce la credibilite et parce que les evenements qui y sont decrits se sont a peu pres tous passe... quand al qaeddafi avait dit qu'il avait les preuves du financement de sarkozy ... un site syrien la encore avait ecrit les accords et en moins de 24 heures le texte avait disparu du net... c'est plus dure de faire pression sur des gens comme moi qui sont en conflit ouvert avec la DCRI parce qu'elle utilise mon identite mais ... cet accord secret s'est bien rpoduit et la france soutient deja une resolution sur le futur kurdistan... je rappel le texte

http://islamic-intelligence.blogspot.com/2011/03/le-qatar-avait-verse-485-millions-de.html

al qaeddafi est un agetn au lieu d'envoyer ses troupes en europe il n'a qu'a publie ce qu'il sait et comment sarkozy finance illegalement ses campagnes... il destabilisera la france-israel or al qaeddafi et meme al assad jouent le jeu de l'ennemi involontairement ou pas... l'histoire le dira...

wa Allah swt 'alam
7:32 AM


Indian Muslim said...
Thanks for publishing this article bro. It should be understood that Turkey is being projected as the new leader of middle east by the Zion-US-Israelis. And its an illusion to think it is turning east, hell no. It is turning west, there is no doubt about it. And these zionists want an Islam that is compatible with Israel,The Anti-Christ. And Turkey is a model which fits according to their plans. So beware of Turkey, a delusion for muslims. Even some analysts understand the Turkish hypocrisy. And i am not an anti-turk, rather would like to expose AKP and its government using the cloth of moderate 'Calvinist' muslim.
Below are articles of Rick Rozoff and MK Bhadrakumar.

http://www.voltairenet.org/Turkish-Actions-Designed-To

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/MF22Ak01.html
8:25 AM


Israel, Cameron, Coulson, the strange death of Christopher Shale, the next nuclear 9/11 and Murdoch's spying network, behind the News of the World



Abu-Suleyman2:05 PMNo comments


Major Spy Scandal Suppressed: Murdoch’s “Hackers” National Security Threat



 David Cameron UK prime minister, former PM's top aid Andy Coulson, Ruppert Murdoch and Rebekah Brooks, former chief editor of the News of the World. (Israeli stooges very well represented in this photoshopped picture)

Wiretapped:  Police, Security Agencies, Political Leaders, Military…and Some Other Folks

By Gordon Duff, 

www.veteranstoday.com 

A week or so ago, I was at a meeting with the intelligence chief of a major American ally.  With me were good friends, experts in counter-terrorism, surveillance and political intelligence, former top level members of American “alphabet soup” agencies.



Nothing sinister was going on.  There was a problem to be addressed, very real terrorism and a very real threat against a democratic government.  The solutions involved training, technical support and the use of highly classified equipment.





This same equipment, these same capabilities are being used in Britain, we were told, against celebrities.  Then we found the parents of a poor dead girl were victimized, the families of dead servicemen and, finally, police, government and security officials.  What was uncovered was a massive espionage operation using the world’s largest news organization as cover, an organization operating against every free government in the world.



What we found was a story that will never be told anywhere but here.



Let’s take a second and talk about “hacking.”  You don’t “hack” a mobile telephone.  You wiretap.  This is a huge legal difference.  Both are illegal but wiretapping is far more serious.  When done in the name of “national security,” it is subject to abuse and a huge threat to any democratic system.  When used by others, it is called spying.



The case in Britain, reported by the criminals themselves, yes, that’s right, the newspapers that were caught also own the news agencies that report the news.  It goes further, the newspapers and news agencies responsible for the “not so innocent” and “not so limited” spying activities aren’t simply independent companies.  They are owned by Rupert Murdoch and operated as part of the intelligence agencies of the State of Israel.  Murdoch, an Israeli, a fact not known to many, is the most powerful media mogul in the world.  His corporations own, not just Fox News, but networks, magazines, websites and newspapers around the world, the biggest, the most scandalous, the most biased and the most politically extreme.



They are also mechanisms for an Israeli intelligence operation using their vast resources to control governments, the United States, Britain, Germany, France, Greece, so many governments.  Spying operations such as the one uncovered in Britain are part of that capability.



Is this a danger?  Should we allow it because, as we hear every few minutes,


“(Nuclear) Israel is in danger of being pushed into the sea by armies of Muslim fanatics.”


Let’s take a second and talk about an Israeli spy doing life in prison.  His name is Jonathan Pollard.  He worked for the US Navy but spied for Israel.  Israel and American politicians ‘friendly’ to Israel demand his release every year. 



This is what his crimes are claimed to be:


Pollard stole information on Palestinian terror camps and passed it on to Israel


Why then, with the tremendous pressure the powerful Israeli lobby puts on the US, does the US military and the various intelligence and law enforcement agencies insist Pollard die in prison?  The answer is simple.  What Israel and Barney Frank and friends say about Pollard’s crimes is a lie.  This is what Pollard did:


At the height of the Cold War, Pollard accessed and passed on this information:

NATO defense plans against a Soviet/Eastern Bloc attack
Exact locations of all American strategic nuclear forces
Names of all American intelligence agents and assets operating in nations “unfriendly” to the United States
Technical plans for advanced nuclear weapons and missile guidance systems
Everything else…

This information was given to Israel and directly transferred to the Soviet Union.  It is believed that tens of thousands of Russian Jews and selected “others” were allowed to emigrate to Israel in exchange.  Other considerations, financial in nature, were part of the deal.


What did Pollard cost the United States?



Estimates indicate that 1,100 people died because of Pollard, tortured and executed or died in Soviet gulags.  These people were America’s “eyes and ears,” the heart of our intelligence community during the most dangerous period, thus far, in the history of the world.








Billions of dollars of technology was transferred to the Soviet Union, pushing some of their defense sectors forward more than a decade.
Pollard nearly caused World War III.




This is why he is still in jail.





The “spin,” from Israel, from the Murdoch “press machine” and from Israel’s friends in congress, demands Pollard’s release.  Much of the “leverage” behind this push, the push toward an attack on Iran, manipulation of American public opinion on Libya, on the Palestinian issues and the other areas is likely from “information” gained by illegal electronic eavesdropping, “wiretapping” done under the guise of “journalism.”





The “front” or “durable cover” for these spy activities is “news.”  The ‘news,” of course, is “dirt” for scandal rags, not really news at all.



The issue from a national security standpoint is that the news agencies themselves are directly affiliated with the same intelligence agencies tied to Pollard and now being tied to 9/11.





These “shadow” Israeli owned news agencies that we know as Fox News or the Wall Street Journal are part of a robust operational capability, intelligence gathering, propaganda and broad political infiltration.





The entire concept of “neocon” is another expression of a partnership between the Israel lobby, Israeli run news organizations in the US and right wing extremists responsible for looking the other way on 9/11, for looking the other way when the economy was looted, for looking the other way when constitutional rights were suspended or elections rigged or phony wars planned and executed or when the United States took over Afghanistan in order to set up an opium farm to control 92% of the world’s heroin business.





Let’s talk eavesdropping.  Let’s talk about the equipment that Rupert Murdoch gets for his reporters.





Back in that meeting with a national intelligence chief, accessing such equipment was on the table.  There were a couple of sources, one in Israel and one elsewhere.  The equipment has legitimate counter-intelligence uses and is available to police and intelligence agencies.  These are systems that can wiretap mobile phones and text messages over large areas.  One such piece of equipment manages “slave” units, receiver and transmitter units that can be used to intercept calls and messages over many miles and many hundreds of phones.





This is how the equipment at this level, the things “reporters” keep in their car in London, has to be demonstrated and purchased:


The country purchasing this equipment sends technical experts to a third country.  These experts enter the embassy of the producer nation and the equipment is demonstrated.  It is then paid for in cash, some units cost up to $2.5 million each, and transferred to the embassy of the purchasing nation.





The units are then transferred to the end users by diplomatic courier.


These things aren’t made in Britain.  They can’t be imported.  They can only be smuggled into the country, the act of doing so is espionage. The US has dozens of these units.  They are with the CIA, NSA, Homeland Security and other such organizations.  The use of these units under FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) was found to be illegal, a violation of constitutional rights.





This is when used by the NSA, not by “reporters” or “anti-defamation” groups.



When James O’Keefe of “Acorn” fame was picked up for breaking into a congresswoman’s office, one of these units was seized.  O’Keefe was trained in Israel.





One of the services offered “Israel friendly” members of congress, other than a deluge of laundered drug money for their campaigns is the services of clandestine intelligence agents using highly classified and illegal surveillance equipment smuggled into the United States to spy on their opponents.





These units are also used to spy on law enforcement organizations, as in Britain, tasked with investigating political corruption.  This is called “counter-intelligence” by some.  Others call it “perversion of the course of justice.”





Remember, the spying on celeb’s is the “cover.”  As long as you are intercepting Tiger Wood’s text messages, you can spy on the FBI or Special Branch all day long.





In Britain it went further, investigators at Scotland Yard received bribes to suppress the initial investigations.  If it went on there, it is going on here.





When the story was still being successfully managed as “celeb phone hacking” and not national security level espionage,  the genie was ‘still in the bottle.’





Now we have another story but nobody we can trust to report it, nobody we can trust to investigate it, not in Britain and not in the United States.





What we have is simple.  Embassies are bringing in highly classified and restricted equipment that can only legally be used by security agencies under strict supervision (ouch) and giving it to “reporters.”  The fun and innocent side is celeb gossip.  The darkside, no longer speculation involves spying and bribing police.





The real issues aren’t about news or celebs or even torturing the families of murder victims of dead soldiers.



The real story is spying, managing false flag terror cells and outwitting police and security agencies.



Here in the US, we call such actions a “clear and present danger.”





These are acts of war.



http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/07/07/major-spy-scandal-suppressed-murdochs-hackers-national-security-threat/comment-page-1/#comment-236108





Kiss Of ‘Democratic’ Death: Israel’s Plot To Take Down Syria II



Abu-Suleyman3:37 AM1 comment



There is much more
to Al-Jazeera than meets
the eye. Behind the
curtain lies a shady
Zionist past.


by Jonathan Azaziah,

www.maskofzion.com

In the the first part of the series, prior plots against Syria were brought to light and the modern alliance between Zionism and the House of Saud was exposed, as were the directors of the Zionist-Saudi axis' 'Syrian Revolution.' Here in the conclusion of 'Kiss of 'Democratic' Death,' the more clandestine hands attempting to deliver Syria into ruin will be revealed and all doubts to what this revolution actually is will be put to rest... 


Media Manipulation: Zionism and Al-Jazeera Unite

No attack on sovereign nations, whether overt like in Libya or covert like in Syria, comes without a steady flow of propaganda against the ‘hostile environment’ being targeted. And the psychological warfare being waged against Syria is exceedingly heavy. The Zionist-run, Zionist-owned Western mainstream press was not alone in this sustained campaign of skullduggery though. This time around, it partnered up with the Qatari state media giant Al-Jazeera to boost the hasbara festivities and give them an ‘Arab’ feel, therefore granting ‘legitimacy’ to the aforesaid hasbara.

Al-Jazeera has operated with a pro-Israel, anti-Resistance stance from its inception, employing many Zionist hardliners to shape programming and reporting (73). The reason for this, unbeknownst to most, is that the US-backed Qatari dictator, Emir Hamad Bin Khalifa al-Thani, did not create Al-Jazeera, although he is its predominant fiancier. Al-Jazeera was created by the French-Israeli billionaire Zionist brothers, David and Jean Frydman, who set up the network to infiltrate media in the Islamic World and to control Middle East discourse on the Zionist occupation of Palestine. Both of them served as senior advisors to the Zionist war criminal prime ministers Yitzhak Rabin and Ehud Barak (74). Jean Frydman was also the personal financier of the father of Israel’s illegal nuclear program, war criminal Shimon Peres, and he poured millions of dollars into the ‘Oslo process (75),’ which tightened the Zionist entity’s stranglehold over Palestine. 

For those who were unaware of Al-Jazeera’s hidden Zionist history and blind to its Zionist bias due to its ‘credible’ reporting on US war crimes in occupied Iraq and Afghanistan, the shroud of credibility began to vanish during the ‘Jan25 Revolution’ in Egypt, the hub being Tahrir Square in Cairo. Egypt’s revolution was/is a blend of Zionist infiltration through Western NGOs and globalist meddling at the highest level to counteract real frustration, real anger, real revolutionaries and their solidarity-anti-war-based activism.

The driving force behind the legitimate aspects of the revolution was Mubarak’s indentured servitude to Zionism and the pro-Israel administration in Washington D.C.; Tahrir Square’s protesters wanted an end to American military aid, an end to IMF domination, an end to Zionism and the liberation of Palestine. Activists repeatedly made these demands and continue to do so to this very moment. Al-Jazeera reported on none of it and continues to report on none of it, deliberately ignoring it and forging a watered-down false narrative to sell subscriptions to Western masses. Al-Jazeera’s analysis of the events in Egypt was completely dominated by Westerners from Zionist think tanks and NGOs, the same NGOs directing and funding the infiltration of the revolution (76).



Al-Jazeera has
served Zionism from its
inception and
continues to serve it
today in Libya and Syria.

Al-Jazeera further shot itself in the foot when it began covering the CIA’s coup attempt in Libya, peddling rumors, outright fabrications, unverified statistics and anti-Qaddafi propaganda as legitimate journalism to justify NATO’s invasion. Al-Jazeera’s work on Libya has been nothing short of warmongering (77). This is to be expected though, and not only because of the undeniable Zionism of Al-Jazeera. Al-Jazeera’s patron, the despot of Qatar, is entrenched in the criminal war being waged against Libya. The CIA-backed, Israeli-advised rebels are receiving anti-tank weapons from Qatar (78), they have already signed an oil-marketing deal with Qatar (79), and together, the Qatar Emir and the Libyan rebels have begged America like dogs to amp up its destruction of Libya (80). With Libya under NATO siege and Egypt’s revolution hijacked and crushed, Al-Jazeera turned its attention to Syria.

The Western media’s alliance with Al-Jazeera reared its ugly head from the onset of the ‘Syrian Revolution.’ As the last section completely exposed, the ‘peaceful demonstrators’ were actually armed rebels, with their weapons coming from Zionist ally Jordan and their orders coming from Tel Aviv, Washington D.C. and Riyadh. After months of lies and propaganda, the United States government has finally admitted that there are indeed armed rebels carrying out violence in Syria, stating ‘there are a lot of them (81).’ Mainstream media has deliberately ignored the provocations of and attacks on Syrian security forces that have occurred from the opening week of the revolt, in which the Saudi-Israeli-directed armed gangs fired on and killed policemen and torched courthouses, hospitals, communications centers and Bashar al-Assad’s party headquarters (82). Hundreds of soldiers have been killed by this Zionist-designed insurrection and at least three mass graves filled with Syrian security forces have been found already (83).



Armed MB fighters
that Al-Jazeera
and the mainstream
Zionist media
refuse to report on.

Instead of reporting these facts, Al-Jazeera has fabricated multiple eyewitness reports, bloated the death toll, broadcasted incitement against Bashar al-Assad, put forth the foreign policy objectives of the GCC dictatorships to bring down the Syrian government and ignored the vital fact that the Zionist-run National Endowment for Democracy (NED) is active on the ground in Syria (84). Instead of reporting these facts, the mainstream media and Al-Jazeera peddle the (admittedly) unverifiable, false casualty claims of London-based Syrian opposition groups, which boast about their membership with Zionism’s NED (85). Instead of reporting these facts, Al-Jazeera is manipulating imagery to fit with its anti-Syria agenda and paying actors to make false statements against Bashar al-Assad (86).

Mainstream media has consistently reported on snipers shooting at ‘pro-democracy’ protesters and has published recorded ‘eyewitness’ testimony from a member of Syrian security forces who ‘admitted’ that the snipers are Syrian military. The problem with this ‘eyewitness,’ like every other ‘eyewitness’ presented by the Al-Jazeera-Zionist media axis, is that his name isn’t real, his voice has been modified, and the person who supposedly produced the recording isn’t using his real name either (87).

None of it is real and everything is muddled because it’s another Zionist media fabrication. What is not being reported in the mainstream, is that the Syrian government has fully disclosed that there are indeed snipers firing not only on ‘protesters,’ but security forces as well (88). Mainstream media would never reveal that the snipers are agents of the Zionist-Saudi plan to destabilize Syria put together by Saudi National Security Advisor ‘Prince’ Bandar bin Sultan and the slippery Zionist criminal, Jeffrey Feltman (discussed earlier). The Feltman-Sultan plan, financed by $2 billion in Saudi funds, trained agents within Syria in sniper fire, arson and ‘sectarian attacks,’ all for the cause of fracturing Syria and terminating its support for Hezbollah and Iran (89). Hence, why the Zionist media is also spreading vile hasbara about Iranian forces and Hezbollah fighters assisting Bashar al-Assad ‘crush dissent,’ obvious lies originating from Mossad and its closest ally in Syria, the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood (90).



Former Al-Jazeera
Beirut Bureau Chief,
Ghassan Bin Jeddo.

The nail in Al-Jazeera’s coffin in regards to its war on the Syrian nation is the resignation of its Beirut Bureau Chief, Ghassan Bin Jeddo, one of the most respected and objective journalists in the entire Arab world. Bin Jeddo, a fervent Arab nationalist and passionate supporter of Resistance to Zionism, resigned over Al-Jazeera’s shameless adherence to the foreign policy initiatives of the Zionist-Saudi alliance (91). He was furious that Al-Jazeera had launched a ‘smear campaign’ against Syria and labeled the network a ‘propaganda outlet (92).’ Going even further, Bin Jeddo declared “Al-Jazeera has resorted to gutter journalism. It is now an operations room for incitement and mobilization (93).” Ben Jeddo also confirmed that Al-Jazeera was fabricating information for its propaganda assault on Syria and expressed his disgust at the channel’s reporting on events in Bahrain (94). Ben Jeddo now plans to launch a new Arab channel from Beirut (95), presumably to counteract Al-Jazeera and its campaign against regional Resistance, Syria in particular.

Lastly, the demonstrations against Bashar al-Assad, despite their Zionist-Saudi financing and training have been minuscule considering Syria’s population consists of more than 20 million people. In contrast, the solidarity with the Resistance government has been tremendous and of course, not covered at all or mentioned in passing in typical ‘downplaying’ fashion by the Zionist media (Al-Jazeera included).



Massive pro-Assad rally
in Damascus. Not covered
by the Zionist media
(Al-Jazeera included)
at all.

On June 21st, millions of Syrians hit the streets throughout the nation in solidarity with Bashar al-Assad and the Resistance, including the Zionist-Saudi-strongholds of Aleppo and Homs, shattering the illusion that the President had no support in these cities (96). On March 29th, just two weeks after the destabilization plot began, hundreds of thousands marched through Damascus and four other cities in solidarity with Bashar al-Assad, eclipsing the smaller demos held by Zionism’s agents, displaying pictures of the President and flags of Syria together with occupied Palestine (97).

The June 15th rally for Bashar al-Assad was equally impressive, with hundreds of thousands of supporters unveiling a 2.3 kilometer flag that stretched through the streets of Damascus and chanting, “the people want Bashar al-Assad! (98)” The Chaldean Bishop of Aleppo attended the massive rally and confirmed that not only do Syria’s Christians wholeheartedly support Bashar al-Assad but 80% of Syria does (99). Abroad, Bashar al-Assad is receiving the same support in global arenas like Bulgaria (100), Lebanon (101) and even Dearborn, Michigan (102). With global support and the overwhelming solidarity of the populace on Bashar al-Assad’s side, it is evident that what the Syrian people want is not the overthrow of the person defending their nation from Zionist colonization but his continued reign with the necessary reforms implemented to better Syria as a whole. It is also evident that the ‘Syrian Revolution’ is a carefully concocted media farce serving as a cover for a destablization plot that is being executed by Zionism and its allies.

Scott Creighton, a journalist and activist who operates the American Everyman/Willy Loman blog at Wordpress.com, perfectly (and brilliantly) pegged the strategy of the mainstream media’s reporting on Syria as “activists’ said journalism.” Any person claiming to be an activist can call into the control rooms and operations boards of any media outlet and ‘report’ something, and because the person on the other end of the phone is claiming to be an activist, the said media outlet can print it without any investigation or discretion and present it as accurate, fact-based news. Unfortunately for the powers that be, this pathetic excuse for journalism crumbles under scrutiny as the ‘activists’ are all linked to Zionism’s NGOs which continue to hover at the center of the destabilization effort against Syria (103). And unfortunately for the powers that be, what their fake ‘activists say,’ is trumped by what the real activists say: ‘Resistance and Bashar are here to stay.’



Turkey claims
it represents Resistance
while bowing to the
Zionist regime behind
closed doors.

Turkey: The Beast of Two Faces Emerges

May 31st, 2010. Early in the morning, in international waters, Zionist naval commandos illegally stormed an aid ship known as the Mavi Marmara, a Turkish ship part of the Freedom Flotilla mission to break Israel’s criminal siege against the Gaza Strip, and in stunningly savage fashion,  murdered 9 unarmed Turkish peace activists with the youngest being 19-year old Furkan Dogan, a dual Turkish-American citizen. The motive for this savagery, was to kill a historic nuclear agreement between Brazil, Turkey and Iran; which Israel did (104). Beyond that however, more so than another statistic on the Zionist entity’s century-old rap sheet, the attack on the Mavi Marmara was an act of war.

Turkish-Israeli relations had been going south since the Second Intifada. And each subsequent Zionist-initiated disaster/massacre, including Israel’s orchestration of Iraq’s destruction and its bloodthirsty, genocidal bombing of Lebanon in Summer 2006, soured ‘diplomacy’ even further. But it was at the 2009 World Economic Forum where, at least in appearance, civility between Turkey and the Zionist entity had hit a stonewall. Prime Minister Erdogan and the war criminal Shimon Peres shared a furious exchange in which Erdogan bashed the Zionist regime for its crimes against humanity in Gaza. In the aftermath, Turkey cancelled military exercises with IOF (105). Tension was at its peak, and analysts, activists and observers alike agreed that the Mavi Marmara murders were the proverbial straw that would break the camel’s back. It was believed that Turkey would cut its ties with the Zionist entity once and for all.

Everybody was wrong. Instead of withdrawing recognition of the usurping, occupying entity, the Turkish government bizarrely asked (over and over and over again) for it to apologize for its crimes and compensate the victims’ families with Zionist blood money. What is even more bizarre, is that after the Zionist entity humiliated Turkey to an even greater degree by stating publicly it would not apologize under any circumstances (106), Turkey still asked for the apology, as if it was a dog pleading with its master for a treat.

The incessant begging exposed Turkey’s real agenda and its attempt at portraying itself as a nation of Resistance slowly disintegrated. Turkey wanted entry into the European Union, a stronger role in NATO and desperately wanted the title of ‘regional power,’ serving as a power broker and go-between for East and West. How does a nation achieve such lofty ambitions? By bowing down to the Zionist entity of course. Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Turkey’s incumbent Prime Minister, accepted the ‘Courage to Care’ award from the ADL (107), a rotten, racist Zionist organization that has been linked to spying and other subversive activities for years. What kind of Resistance figure accepts an award from any Zionist institution, let alone one as vilely treacherous as the ADL?



Erdogan The Hypocrite:
Seen here shaking
hands with the
murderer of
murderers,
the butcher of
butchers, Ariel Sharon.

Additionally, Erdogan, a defender of Zionism’s Armenian Genocide and denier of it even being a genocide, came under fire from the Mossad-CIA psyop known as Wikileaks and in the aftermath of the ‘Cablegate’ scandal, sent helicopters to the Zionist entity during recent forest fires on ethnically cleansed land in Palestine (108). Erdogan and his government did not send helicopters to Pakistan, Yemen or Somalia after Zionist stooge Obama’s drone bombings. Nor did he send helicopters to illegally besieged Gaza or Lebanon after the Zionist entity’s murderous bombings in 2006 and 2008-09. No, he sent helicopters to ‘Israel’ to show solidarity with Benjamin Netanyahu and mend ‘broken’ relations.

All of the bluster aside, Turkish-Israeli relations were never strained. It was mere theater; surface hostility. More important than Erdogan’s pathetic, cringe-worthy Zionist solidarity, is what everything boils down to in geopolitics: money, and like the sorely-missed Malcolm X once said, “Zionists have mastered the science of dollarism.” Thousands of Zionist companies operate in Turkey with the gleeful blessing of the Turkish government (109). Turkish-Israeli bilateral trade amounts to at least $3 billion annually and leaders from both entities gloat that is most likely much more than that. Within weeks of the Freedom Flotilla massacre, the Zionist entity and Turkey signed a military deal for $190 million worth of drone technology. Israel’s products (all of which are produced on stolen land from stolen Palestinian natural resources) are deeply entrenched in Turkish society, with nearly all of Turkey’s software, from cell phones to medical equipment, being produced by Zionism (110). Turkey and ‘Israel’ were never going to end such profitable dealings.

The continuing trade and business dealings between Tel Aviv and Ankara in the wake of the Mavi Marmara murders has brought all public animosity to a screeching halt. The Zionist regime and Erdogan’s government are now collaborating in order to doctor a UN report regarding last year’s Freedom Flotilla massacre, with Turkey asking Israel to minimize the damage that Turkey’s image may incur (111). In return, with heavy pressure from the Zionist regime (112), Turkey stopped the Mavi Marmara from sailing with the new Freedom Flotilla II – Stay Human mission to Gaza by refusing to let it sail from Turkish ports (113). And with Turkish-Israeli reconciliation now near imminent completion as Turkish and Zionist officials are working to put together an official ‘reconciliation’ document (114), Ankara and Tel Aviv are now focusing their energies on a most intricate (and regionally rewarding) project: executing the ‘Clean Break’ plan to ‘roll back’ Syria.



Ankara is actively
collaborating with
Tel Aviv to 'roll back'
Syria.

This is affirmed by the February comments of, Dr. Oded Eran, who served as the Zionist ambassador to the European Union, ambassador to Jordan and is currently the director of the treacherous Israeli Institute For National Security studies (115). He spoke in a most ominous manner about the Arab revolutions and the affect that they would have on Turkish-Israeli ties. Disturbingly, he stated, “Given the seriousness of the situation created by the political upheaval in the Arab world, this may accelerate the process of restoring Turkish-Israeli ties.” Eran also stated that it would be in the best interest of the Zionist regime and Turkey to cooperate in delivering stability to the Middle East (116). How better for Israel and Turkey to bring ‘stability,’ i.e. propping up dictatorships that support the hegemonic Zionist agenda and toppling those who don’t, than invoking the Israeli-Turkish joint intelligence agreement.

This 1993 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) facilitated far-reaching, dastardly cooperation between Turkey and Zionism. The Zionist entity armed and trained the Turkish army in ‘anti-terror’ warfare along the borders of Iraq, Iran and Syria and Turkey allowed the Zionist entity to gather intelligence on Iran and Syria from within Turkey. The militaries of each entity meet frequently to discuss the prospects attained and assess it in the context of usefulness in future military and intelligence operations against ‘hostile environments.’ Under this agreement, Turkey is supporting the Israeli-Saudi operation against Syria in its entirety and it is assisting the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood’s incursions into the border town of Jisr al-Shughour militarily and with intelligence. All the while Turkey is exerting pressure on Bashar al-Assad to accept the Tel Aviv-Riyadh-Washington plans of regime change and step down (117). Erdogan has publicly declared that Bashar al-Assad’s response to the uprising is nothing short of “savagery (118),” knowing full-well that his country is supporting an armed insurrection.

Turkey’s involvement goes deeper. Turkish military and political leaders are heavily discussing the idea of setting up a buffer-zone within northern Syria, a deliberate violation of Syrian sovereignty. This will provide armed MB fighters easier entry into Syria to carry out the orders of Tel Aviv and Riyadh. Turkey has given safe haven to the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood’s leaders and recently hosted a high-level meeting between Syrian opposition figures and US officials (119). Ankara also hosted former CIA head and current Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta for five days in late April. The topic? Regime change in Syria (120). The Zionist-run US government has formed operational headquarters in southern Turkey near the Syrian border and has upped its aid to the Turkish army to assist Syrian dissidents in any way possible, including armed MB members (121). On the media front, the Turkish NTV channel has been churning out the same lies that the Zionist media has, including the lunacy about Iranian soldiers and Hezbollah ‘suppressing protesters (122).’



Is a Turkish-led 
NATO invasion of
Syria at the behest of
Israel an imminent
reality?

The most frightening development of all, is that Turkey has given the green light to NATO to transform the Izmir Air Station in western Turkey into a base for ground forces (123). Former Turkish diplomat Ozdemn Sanberk, who is well-known and is still frequently called upon by government circles (124) and is currently sitting on the High Advisory Board of the Global Political Trends Center, a think tank that openly collaborates with the Soros-funded London School of Economics (125), has stated in a recent interview that Bashar al-Assad is ‘doomed’ and has admitted that Turkey is pursuing a policy that will ensure the ‘demise of the (Syrian) regime while protecting Turkish security (126).’ Is Sanberk referring to a NATO invasion of Syria? With Ankara already militarily involved in Syria as per its MOU with Israel and the events that led up to the NATO invasion of Libya paralleling the events in Syria, such an action is not out of the question.

What makes Turkey’s involvement so dangerous to Syria and detrimental to Resistance throughout the region is that it is clearly a beast with two faces. It disgustingly wears a mask of Islam and Resistance to fool and manipulate the naive and the hopeful while its true face remains submerged in a mound of intrigue and subversion, all for its Zionist masters. And what exactly is the true goal of this Tel Aviv-Ankara-Riyadh axis, excluding the aforementioned ‘regional stability?’ It isn’t just regime change. This axis wants to take down al-Assad and replace it with a racist, Saudi-like regime that will cripple ties with Iran and recognize the Zionist regime as a legitimate country (127). It will be up to the Syrian people, not just Bashar al-Assad and his army, to fight this plot and save their country.


'A Gay Girl In
Damascus' stinks
of Israeli
intelligence.

A Gay Girl In Damascus: Mere Hoax Or Israeli Intelligence Operation?

Hands down, without question, the most bizarre case that has come out of the Zionist plot to take down Syria is the blog known as ‘A Gay Girl In Damascus.’ This odd blog has been hailed and excessively promoted by the Zionist media over the last several months as a means to severely persecute Bashar al-Assad and the Syrian state as a whole. Supposedly, a half-Syrian, half-American lesbian blogger-activist named Amina Abdallah Araf al-Omari, who had been operating the blog for five years to raise awareness on Syria’s ‘poor human rights record,’ was abducted by Syrian security forces for her anti-regime activities. Apart from the obvious Zionist undertone beneath this persona and the story surrounding the ‘abduction,’ there was something else drastically wrong with all of it: nobody had ever met this ‘Amina Abdallah Araf al-Omari’ in person; not a single soul (128).

Nobody had ever met her before because, Amina Abdallah Araf al-Omari didn’t exist. She was the creation of 40-year old Thomas J. Macmaster from Stone Mountain, Georgia who now lives in Edinburgh, Scotland (129). But the trip through the realm of the bizarre doesn’t end there. It was uncovered that Macmaster once wrote about ‘Amina’s dream’ to learn Hebrew, live in the Zionist entity and represent Syria in the ethnically cleansed land now known as ‘Israel (130).’ Despite Macmaster then attempting to portray ‘Amina’ as pro-Palestinian (131), this single post revealed the very unsettling presence of Zionism.

And it gets more bizarre still. The ‘Amina’ profile was then linked to an Israeli website where Macmaster kept a log completely in Hebrew, something Macmaster has attempted to downplay as mere ‘web phishing (132).’ Phishing? Doubtful. Fishy? Absolutely. Once Macmaster was outed as the mastermind behind the Amina hoax, he issued an apology on the ‘Gay Girl In Damascus’ blog. Macmaster delivered the apology to the world from Istanbul, Turkey (133). Yes, of all of the places in the world to be while Zionism and Saudi Arabia direct armed insurrectionists against Syria, an American who is seemingly fluent in Hebrew is spreading hasbara about Bashar al-Assad and distributing fake reports about ‘human rights violations’ from Turkey, a central player in the ‘kiss of democratic death.’
      


Thomas J. Macmaster:
the American behind
'A Gay Girl In
Damascus.'

Mask of Zion’s sources have confirmed that Macmaster had also befriended several prominent solidarity activists, scholars and (real) pro-Palestine bloggers on Facebook, the social networking giant owned by Zionist Mark Zuckerberg. It is necessary to document that Facebook was started with capital provided by men who were board members of CIA’s business wing, In-Q-Tel and is now being used by the agency to recruit personnel for its ‘National Clandestine Service (134).’ Zuckerberg met with Zionist war criminal Shimon Peres at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland in February 2009 to discuss ‘fighting anti-Semitism’ with Facebook (135), an Orwellian premise if there ever was one. And when the Zionist entity called on Zuckerberg to remove the ‘Third Intifada’ fan page from his website, he heeded the call and did just that, in violation of free speech everywhere (136). Facebook is a data-mining festival being monitored by the CIA that is literally run by Zionist thought police.

Why aren’t the important questions being asked? This was deception on a massive scale, and the links between Macmaster, the Zionist entity, Syria and Turkey at this particular moment in history are undeniable. They are not coincidental and they stick out like a peacock in a white room.

Why was Tom Macmaster allowed to operate a fraudulent profile on Zionist-owned Facebook, essentially keeping tabs on top personalities in the solidarity movement? Is Tom Macmaster an intelligence officer employed by the Zionist entity, the United States or is he an informant/asset of either/both? Indirectly of course, Macmaster is an asset of the Zionist-globalist agenda against Syria simply because of the hasbara he disseminated, but if in fact Macmaster was/is a paid intelligence agent, it raises a much more sinister question: how many more like Macmaster are out there? The answer could be tens, hundreds or even thousands, especially considering Israel operates a vast and hyperactive cyber warfare unit that employs thousands of agents (137). Lastly, if Macmaster was/is an intelligence asset, how much did the now-exposed two-faced Turkish government know about his activities? Was it assisting him? Protecting him? Are there others like Macmaster in Turkey?

Though these questions will most likely never be answered, what is clear is that the Zionist media will latch on to anything and everything that it can get its grimy tentacles on in its efforts to make Syria out to be a monster and justify a NATO invasion. What is also clear, is that activists must be careful, as Zionism’s agents lurk at every dark corner of the internet, which has become a battleground in the war of oppressed vs. oppressor.



Bashar al-Assad
represents 1/3 of the
'Resistance Axis,' all that
stands between Israel and
all-out domination of the
Middle East.

Conclusion: Long Live The Resistance

The Zionist entity and its coalition of devilish allies are just as relentless to topple Syria now as they were when the ‘Syrian Revolution’ first began in mid-March. And the ‘international community’ of warmongers and kleptocrats are raising the stakes. The International Criminal Court has issued an indictment for Bashar al-Assad for ‘murdering anti-government protesters (138).’ Was an investigation conducted? Of course not. Is there any evidence of such outrageous claims? No, not even a smidgen.

The US has imposed sanctions on Bashar al-Assad and six top officials in the Syrian government, a move that was condemned by Syria as ‘serving Israeli interests’ in the region (139). The EU, led by Zionist-dominated France, has imposed much more punishing sanctions, which have already taken effect on the everyday lives of Syria’s citizenry. The Assad government has lashed out at Europe and slammed its move as ‘economic warfare (140).’ France has openly pursued regime change in Syria with Saudi Arabia and the US since 2006 (141).
              
In addition to facing a Zionist-manipulated armed revolt on the homefront and sanctions hammering its economy from abroad, the Syrian government is being ripped to shreds in the Zionist media, which is now accusing Bashar al-Assad of being behind the Naksa Day protests in al-Jaulan on June 5th.  He is being accused of paying poor farmers in the village of Majdal Shams $1,000.00 apiece to rush the ‘border’ with the Zionist entity in hopes of taking international attention off of his brutality against ‘pro-democracy’ protesters.

The origin of this pathetic information blows its smokescreen away however and reveals it as sheer falsehood. It was produced by none other than the Reform Party of Syria, headed by Farid al-Ghadry, AIPAC member and Zionist agent who as aforementioned, has been at the core of fueling the unrest in Syria (142). When this information failed to materialize as believable, the Zionist media then magically produced a ‘Syrian government’ document that ‘confirmed’ another one of its lies from a month earlier, that Syria organized the protests on May 15th, Nakba Day. Under scrutiny, this crashes and burns too.



Thousands of
Syrians and Palestinians
gathered in Quneitra, Syria
to honor the martyrs of
Naksa Day.

The ‘Syrian government’ document was ‘obtained’ by Michael Weiss (143), the head of Just Journalism, a widely-known Zionist propaganda outlet that is rabidly anti-Islam, anti-Arab, anti-Resistance and openly dedicated to ‘defending’ Israel in the media and whitewashing Israeli crimes (144). Weiss and the rest of the propagandists in the Zionist media failed to mention that the Nakba Day protests were organized by solidarity activists and Palestinian refugee rights groups from Lebanon and occupied Palestine with no connection to any government. These same activists were involved in the June 5th Naksa Day events (145), which will now forever be remembered as the Naksa Day Massacre, as barbaric Israeli forces shot dead 23 Syrians and Palestinians, including a woman and a child, and wounded more than 350 other civilians for simply demanding Right of Return (146). Do not ever expect these truths to flow from the mouths of the likes of Farid al-Ghadry, Ammar Abdulhamid or Michael Weiss.



Zionism longs to
take control
of the Levantine natural
gas fields in Syria and
Lebanon.

The Zionist regime and its allies are not in business to play checkers. Chess is the name of the game and the ‘rollback’ of Syria would only be step one in the greater scheme of things; greater as in Greater Israel. Behind the ‘kiss of democratic death’ to remove Bashar al-Assad and his Resistance government are two key Zionist goals: control of energy and domination of territory. Syria lies smack dab in the middle of two natural gas corridors that the hegemonic powers have had their eyes on for decades. The first unites Turkey and the Caspian Sea with Palestine and the Red Sea and the second unites (occupied) Iraq with the Mediterranean. Sitting within these corridors are massive natural gas fields off of the Levantine coastlines of Damascus and Beirut which Iran has offered Syria assistance in exploring and cultivating. If Bashar al-Assad is taken down, the Zionist entity and its Euro-American allies will step in and take over the Levantine energy project (147).

It is no secret that the Zionist entity’s goal has always been to extend its borders from the Egyptian Nile to the Iraqi Euphrates, ethnically cleansing everything in its path to make way for Greater Israel. Included in this sadistic project would be the confiscation of all of Syria and all of Lebanon (148). There are two obstacles standing in the way of the ultimate Zionist colonization project: Bashar al-Assad and the Lebanese Islamic Resistance movement, Hezbollah. If Bashar al-Assad and his government are defeated by the Zionist-Saudi-engineered uprising, the Lebanese Resistance will lose its only nation-state ally in the Arab world. Reports are already surfacing that Hezbollah is taking precautions against the fall of their ally by transferring missiles that are stored in secure caches in Syria across the border through camouflage to defend their weaponry from possible Israeli bombardment (149). Israeli-created, Qatari-funded Al-Jazeera has launched a full-scale propaganda campaign against hero, revolutionary and Hezbollah Secretary General, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, labeling him a ‘hypocrite’ for standing in solidarity with Bashar al-Assad (150).



Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah:
the righteous, dignified, courageous
leader of Hezbollah who
is hated and feared
by the Zionist entity
and Saudi Arabia.

This insidious slander against one of, if not the only righteous leader in the Arab world is designed to drive a wedge between human rights factions and solidarity groups, splinter social justice movements and fracture Resistance blocs so Zionism’s tentacles can pick up the pieces and put them back together in the warped fashion of its choice. Hezbollah is the only reason why there are not criminal Zionist extremists living in US-subsidized settlements on the Litani River. Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah is the only voice that thunders loud enough to strike fear into the hearts of the Zionist entity’s leaders, who know that the Sayyed does not lie and does not exaggerate. Hezbollah is the only group in the entire region to deliver a conclusive military defeat to the Israeli occupation army, and the Zionist regime has long sought revenge for its humiliation at the hands of the Lebanese Resistance. Bashar al-Assad has supported Hezbollah’s steadfastness in the face of every act of Zionist intransigence. He will not abandon Hezbollah and Hezbollah will not abandon Bashar al-Assad, and this infuriates Zionism to no avail.

Beyond Lebanon and Syria lies the grand prize that the Zionist entity longs to conquer, demolish and rebuild as a Zionist colony: the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the Zionist-run mega-think tank known as the Brookings Institution has already laid out every possibility in ‘defeating’ Iran in a menacing policy study called ‘Which Path To Persia?’ This paper was written by a slew of influential Zionist policy makers including former ambassador to Israel and chief Zionist lobbyist Martin Indyk and former CIA analyst, Obama advisor and Zionist war criminal Bruce Riedel (151). Riedel frequently speaks at Israel’s Institute For National Security Studies in Tel Aviv and was the Zionist regime’s chief asset in the White House for Afghanistan policy (152). The Zionist-composed ‘Path to Persia’ paper speaks in-depth about Iranian influence over Syria and Hezbollah and discusses several options in eliminating this influence. The Brookings Institution has also published a recent paper that demands Bashar al-Assad step down and accept US-Israeli-mandated regime change immediately (153).



Greater Israel:
the ultimate Zionist
dream that would see
Syria and Lebanon
absorbed into an
'Israeli empire.'

These are indeed grand plans, grand designs and grand plots for the Zionist entity to finally bring to fruition its supremacist fantasy of Greater Israel and what one-eyed war criminal and Zionist mass murderer Moshe Dayan called, ‘an Israeli empire (154).’ But what stands in the way of this hegemonic nightmare is the sincere, righteous Resistance that has kept the usurping Israeli entity from conquering Palestine despite 63 years of ethnic cleansing, massacres, mass murder, land theft, usurpation, assassinations, intimidation and demolitions. It has stopped Israel from turning Syria and Lebanon into Zionist colonies. It has stopped Israel from re-conquering the Sinai and it is firmly standing its ground in occupied Somalia and occupied Kashmir against the allies of Zionism.
      
The Zionist regime’s plans to take down Syria, Hezbollah and Iran will fail not only because the combined military might of these three powers are more awesome than Tel Aviv, London, Paris and Washington D.C. care to admit, but because these three powers have the backing of the people; the backing of the oppressed who would give their lives before bowing down to Western neo-colonial interests. Al-Jazeera’s vicious, degrading propaganda against Sayyed Nasrallah has been spat upon by the people of the region. Bashar al-Assad, as documented earlier, is receiving overwhelming support from the Syrian populace despite the ongoing Zionist-Saudi operation against his government. And Iran, despite thirty years of Zionist-British-American subversion against the Islamic Revolution, continues to flourish in defiance thanks to the backing of its people.

Israel’s ‘kiss of democratic death’ succeeded in bringing horrific chaos to Syria but it has failed in all other aspects. Al-Jumhuriyyah al-Arabiyyah as-Suriyyah will prevail today as it did yesterday under Bashar al-Assad’s late father, Hafez, in the face of the same Zionist tactics. Long live the Resistance, the almost ethereal force that has always served as a humbling reminder to oppressive powers. And in that spirit, may they be reminded again now: your reign, your games and your plots are as temporary as the night is dark.

~ The End ~

Kiss Of ‘Democratic’ Death: Israel’s Plot To Take Down Syria I

Sources:

(73) Al-Jazeera – Pro-Israel Arab Network by Rehmat’s World

(74) Sowing The Seeds Of Violence And Instability by Ghali Hassan, Counter Currents

(75) The Confessions Of Jean Frydman by Barry Chamish

(76) Al-Jazeera: An Island Of Pro-Empire Intrigue by Sukant Chandan, Monthly Review

(77) Al Jazeera Continues To Flog Mythical Libya Narrative by Martin Iqbal, Empire Strikes Black

(78) Libyan Rebels Receiving Anti-Tank Weapons From Qatar by Ian Black, The Guardian

(79) Libya Rebels Pen Oil Deal With Qatar by Marc Burleigh, Agence Presse France

(80) Libya Rebels, Qatar Urge Bigger US Military Role by The Arkansas Democrat Gazette

(81) Syrian Unrest Stirs New Fear Of Deeper Sectarian Divide by Anthony Shadid, The New York Times

(82) Media Disinformation: The Protest Movement In Syria by Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research

(83) Third Mass Grave Found In Syria by Press TV

(84) Al Jazeera’s War On Syria by Stephen Lendman

(85) The Siege Of Syria by Tony Cartalucci, Land Destroyer Report

(86) The Middle East Counter-Revolution by Thierry Meyssan, Voltaire Network

(87) ‘Snipers Ordered To Aim For The Head’ by France 24

(88) Syria: Who Is Behind The Protest Movement? Fabricating A Pretext For A US-NATO “Humanitarian Intervention’ by Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research

(89) Why Did Website Linked To Syria Regime Publish U.S.-Saudi Plan To Oust Assad? by Zvi Bar’el, Haaretz

(90) Hizbullah And Iranian Fighters In Syria by As’ad Abu Khalil, The Angry Arab News Service

(91) Ghassan Bin Jiddu: Resigns From Aljazeera by As’ad Abu Khalil, The Angry Arab News Service

(92) Al-Jazeera Beirut Bureau Chief Resigns by Press TV

(93) Al Jazeera's Beirut Bureau Chief, Ghassan Ben Jeddo, Resigns by Yoshie Furuhashi, Monthly Review

(94) Ghassan Ben Jeddo: Resignation Reason Is al-Jazeera's Method In Covering The ME Events by Syrian Arab News Agency

(95) Ghassan Ben Jeddo To Launch A New Channel by Anayou English

(96) 21 June: Massive Demonstrations In Syria by Voltaire Network

(97) Damascus - Hundreds Of Thousands In Syria March In Pro-Assad Demonstration by Vos Iz Neias?

(98) Syrians Rally In Support Of The President by Press TV

(99) Giant Pro-Assad Rally In Damascus, Bishop Says 80 Per Cent Of The People Behind Him by Asia News

(100) Syrians In Bulgaria To Stage Pro-Assad Rally by Sofia News Agency

(101) Beirut Pro-Assad Rally Swamps Vigil For Syria Dead by Agence France Presse

(102) Rally In Support Of Syria President Packs Dearborn Hall by Niraj Warikoo, Detroit Free Press

(103) More “Activists Said” Journalism On Syria, This Time At Raw Story by Scott Creighton, American Everyman

(104) The Reality Of Zionism by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion

(105) Turkish – Israeli Relations by Stephen Lendman

(106) Israel: We Will Not Apologize To Turkey Over Flotilla Deaths by Barak Ravid and Jack Khoury, Haaretz

(107) Prime Minister Erdogan Tells ADL That “Anti-Semitism Has No Place in Turkey” by The Anti-Defamation League

(108) Wikileaks Is Zionist Poison II: Deconstruction Of The Myth by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion

(109) New Crisis Simmering Between Turkey And Israel by Habib Toumi, Gulf News

(110) Turkey And Israel Do A Brisk Business by Dan Bilefsky, The New York Times

(111) Israeli Official: Turkey Wants UN To Tone Down Report On Gaza Flotilla Raid by Barak Ravid, Haaretz

(112) Gaza Flotilla Ship Mavi Marmara Will Not Join New Aid Mission by The Telegraph

(113) Turkish Ship Involved In Gaza Flotilla Raid Pulls Out Of Next Convoy by Barak Ravid, Haaretz

(114) Is Turkish-Israeli Reconciliation Imminent? by Alon Ben-Meir, The Jerusalem Post

(115) Experts: Dr. Oded Eran by The Institute For National Security Studies

(116) Arab Unrest Could Help Turk-Israeli Ties, Says Former Israeli Diplomat by Fulya Ozerkan, Hurriyet Daily News

(117) The Destabilization Of Syria And The Broader Middle East War by Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research

(118) Turkish PM Criticizes Syrian President, Calls Crackdown On Protesters Savagery by The Associated Press

(119) Analysis: Turkey Loses Patience Over Syria by Ibon Villelabeitia, Reuters Canada; Muslim Brotherhood And US Representatives At Syrian Opposition Conference In Antalya, Turkey by As’ad Abu Khalil, Monthly Review

(120) Report: CIA Chief Held Secret Talks On Syria In Turkey by Ynet

(121) ‘Turkey Executes US Plots In Syria’ by Press TV

(122) Turkey Leads Anti-Syria Smear Campaign by Press TV

(123) Turkey To Host NATO Ground Forces by Press TV

(124) Board: Ambassador (R) Ozdem Sanberk by Global Political Trends Center

(125) About GPOT by Global Political Trends Center; Hunting For Witches In An Ivory Tower by Danna Harman, Haaretz

(126) Assad Bound To Go, Says Former Turkish Diplomat by Hurriyet Daily News

(127) The Strategy Of The Saudi-Zionist Axis To Destabilize Syria by Mohammed Omar, The Islam Times

(128) ‘A Gay Girl In Damascus’ Comes Clean by Melissa Bell and Elizabeth Flock, The Washington Post

(129) New Evidence About Amina, The “Gay Girl In Damascus” Hoax by Ali Abunimah and Benjamin Doherty, The Electronic Intifada

(130) Tom Macmaster And His Zionist Agenda by As’ad Abu Khalil, The Angry Arab News Service

(131) On The “Gay Girl In Damascus” by As’ad Abu Khalil, The Angry Arab News Service

(132) My Interview With Tom Macmaster by As’ad Abu Khalil, The Angry Arab News Service

(133) “Gay Girl In Damascus” Comes Out As Tom Macmaster, Istanbul by Dimi Reider, 972 Magazine

(134) Facebook - The CIA Conspiracy by Matt Greenop, Global Research

(135) Israeli Prez: Use Facebook To Fight Hate by CBS News

(136) Facebook Drops ‘Intifada’ Page For Promoting Violence by BBC News

(137) Israel’s Unit 8200: Cyber Warfare by Damien McElroy, The Telegraph

(138) Syria: President Bashar al-Assad Faces Indictment By The International Criminal Court by Adrian Blomfield, The Telegraph

(139) Syria Condemns U.S. Sanctions On Assad by The New York Times

(140) Syria Warns Against Outside Interference, Fingers France by Ma’an News Agency

(141) Assad Has Run Out Of Friends, And Run Out Of Time by Rime Allaf, The Telegraph

(142) Syria Opposition: Anti-Israel Rioters Paid $1,000 by Ynet

(143) Report: Document Reveals Nakba Day Clashes Planned By Syria Government by Haaretz

(144) About: Mission Statement by Just Journalism

(145) Interview: Planning The Nakba Day Movement In Lebanon by Max Blumenthal, The Electronic Intifada

(146) 23 Martyrs Including A Child, A Woman And A Journalist, Over 350 Injured In Israeli Attack Against Syrian And Palestinian Citizens Near Occupied Golan by Syrian Arab News Agency

(147) America's Next War Theater: Syria And Lebanon? by Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya, Global Research

(148) Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of 3,000 Years by Israel Shahak (rip)

(149) Report: Hezbollah Moves Missiles From Syria To Lebanon, Fearing Fall Of Assad Regime by Barak Ravid, Haaretz

(150) Al-Jazeera’s War On Sheikh Nasrallah by Rehmat’s World

(151)Which Path To Persia? Options For A New American Strategy Against Iran by Kenneth M. Pollack, Daniel L. Byman, Martin S. Indyk, Suzanne Maloney, Michael E. O'Hanlon and Bruce Riedel, Brookings Institution Press

(152) Afghanistan – Obama’s War For Israel by Christopher Bollyn

(153) Syria: Intervention Inevitable by Tony Cartalucci, Land Destroyer Report

(154) Israel's Grand Design: Leaders Crave Area From Egypt To Iraq by John Mitchell Henshaw, Media Monitors

















1 comments:





yassine said...
Je ne veux pas vous donner des leçons AS, mais je le redis encore une fois faites attention aux articles que vous postez.
Il se trouve que ce type est un illuminé d'origine séfarade (dont on ignore la religion) d'après sa description. Il se peut qu'il soit sayan déguisé après tout.
Je regrette, mais il ne suffit pas de se déclarer anti-sioniste pour être crédible (prenez Chomsky par exemple).

De plus il chante les louanges du régime des Assad??? Sans parler des chiites en passant.
Est que vous savez ce que ces barbares Nusayrites ont fait aux sunnites libanais, palestiniens et syriens dans le passé?
Connaissez vous au moins les Nusayrites soit dit en passant?

Il est plus que temps que les syriens rejettent ces pourritures crypto-prostitués aux sionistes et aux cartels occidentaux.

Je vous encourage vivement à enquêter quant à la traitrise de Hafez qui a offert le golan en 67 sur un plateau d'argent alors qu'il était ministre de la défense, puis à ordonné le cessez le feu en 73 quant les irakiens avaient sauvé la mise et été prêts à se diriger vers le golan.
Puis je vous encourage à vous documenter sur les exactions de l'occupation Nusayrite contre les sunnites en Syrie et au Liban.
Les sionistes resteront toujours en sécurité tant qu'on a pas fait le ménage tout autour. Les Tawaghit en Lybie, Egypte et Syrie sont les meilleurs armes dont ils disposent en ce moment.

Malgré tout ce qu'on peut reprocher à Al jazeera, il suffit d'un journalisme aguerri et honnête pour valider ou affirmer ses infos. La combattre et la prendre pour le diable incarné est une perte de temps et d'énérgie.

Que Dieu vienne en aide à nos frère syriens tués et persécutés dans leur propre pays.
6:34 AM


L'armée des harkis de la france-israel deployée dans toutes les rues des villes algeriennes pour tenter un dernier baroud avant les massacres des quarterons de harkis. L'extremiste talmudo-sioniste, Copevici l'exterminateur juif sioniste en Algerie pour tenter de negocier une nouvelle fois la collecte de malettes de cash pour Sarkozy et demander des explications apres les degats occasionés suites aux revelations de l'entrée de la Turquie dans l'Europe fin 2012, detruisant l'agenda UMP ! Pour envahir la Libye, Cameron et Sarkozy avaient planifié des attentats AQMI... Cameron est pris dans un gigantesque scandale d'espionnage liant le mossad a l'empire Murdoch, Sarkozy ne dort plus la nuit et tente maintenant d'etre conciliant, trop tard.... Mort a la France-Israel au Maghreb!



Abu-Suleyman3:10 AMNo comments


La France coloniale et ses crimes en Algérie


Entretien avec Youssef Girard réalisé par Mohammed Soltani pour le quotidien algérien de langue arabe El Bilad. L’entretien a été réalisé à l’occasion du quarante-neuvième anniversaire de l’indépendance de l’Algérie acquise le 5 juillet 1962.

Mohammed Soltani : Quelle est votre analyse sur le débat sur la nécessite de reconnaissance de la France des crimes et les méfaits du colonialisme ?

Youssef Girard : Il est temps que la France regarde son histoire coloniale en face et qu’elle reconnaisse les crimes commis durant cette période. Elle doit reconnaitre les crimes qu’elle a commis pendant les 132 ans de domination coloniale française sur l’Algérie.


Cette reconnaissance est d’autant plus nécessaire que, malgré les luttes de libération nationale, des rapports de domination coloniaux structurent encore le monde actuel au niveau politique, économique et culturel. La reconnaissance des crimes coloniaux est aussi une manière de remettre en question les rapports de domination coloniaux actuels.

MS : A votre avis pourquoi la France refuse la repentance pour ses crimes coloniaux en Algérie ?

YG : Il y a surement de multiples facteurs. Au niveau politique, à peu près tous les courants politiques existants (excepté l’extrême gauche – trotskyste ou anarchiste – qui n’a jamais été associée au pouvoir et les écologistes qui n’existaient pas encore) aujourd’hui sur la scène politique française ont été, à un moment ou à un autre, impliqués dans des crimes coloniaux s’étant déroulés en Algérie. De fait, il est difficile pour ces courants politiques de revenir sur ces crimes car ils finiraient par être obligés de reconnaître leur propre part de responsabilité.

Au niveau de la société civile, les rapatriés d’Algérie et leurs descendants constituent un groupe assez puissant qui s’oppose à toute reconnaissance des crimes commis par la France en Algérie. La loi du 23 février 2005 reconnaissant les « bienfaits du colonialisme » a été votée à leur demande. Récemment, certains rapatriés ont violemment attaqué le film « Hors-la-loi » de Rachid Bouchareb parce qu’il évoquait les massacres du 8 mai 1945. Le groupe social des  rapatriés d’Algérie joue un rôle important dans la non-reconnaissance des crimes coloniaux commis par la France en Algérie.

Au niveau étatique, des institutions comme l’Armée s’opposent aussi à toute reconnaissance car elles seraient au premier rang des accusés. L’armée étant un corps puissant, elle peut avoir une influence décisive en la matière.

MS : On accuse des lobbys, notamment le lobby juif, d’empêcher une réconciliation franco-algérienne. Qu’elle est la part de vérité dans tout cela ?

YG : Il existe des groupes sociaux porteurs d’une mémoire coloniale qui les rend foncièrement hostile à l’Algérie indépendante. J’ai évoqué les rapatriés et leurs descendants, il y a aussi les anciens appelés du contingent qui ont fait la « guerre d’Algérie ». Ces groupes restent souvent très hostiles à l’Algérie.

Les institutions communautaires juives, comme le CRIF[1], ne me semblent pas très impliquées dans la question des rapports entre la France et l’Algérie. Au niveau des questions internationales, elles sont beaucoup plus préoccupées par la défense de l’État sioniste que par les relations franco-algériennes. Les juifs d’Algérie rapatriés ont une mémoire spécifique en raison de la place qu’ils occupaient dans le système colonial prévalant en Algérie. Cependant, leurs positions politiques sur la question de l’Algérie sont souvent assez proches de celles des autres rapatriés.

MS : Dernièrement Chirac a déclaré que l’Algérie n’a pas à demander à la France de reconnaître ses crimes en Algérie mais ce qui a été demandé c’est l’indemnisation. Ne pensez vous pas que c’est une fuite en avant ?

YG : Tout d’abord dans un procès, il n’appartient pas à l’accusé de définir quelles doivent être les réclamations de sa victime sinon ce ne serait qu’un simulacre de justice. De fait, les déclarations de Jacques Chirac ne représentent pas seulement une fuite en avant. Elles sont aussi l’expression de l’arrogance de l’Occident qui se permet de dire à ses victimes non-occidentales ce qu’elles peuvent ou ne peuvent pas demander. Cela signifie que ces personnes ne sont pas sorties du monde colonial et qu’ils veulent préserver la domination coloniale. Pour eux, il y a toujours deux humanités qui n’ont pas les mêmes droits : les occidentaux et les autres.

L’exigence de la reconnaissance des crimes coloniaux par la France est un impératif car il s’agit d’une exigence de vérité et de justice.

MS : On est à la veille du cinquantenaire de l’indépendance, peut-on croire que la France va lever le voile sur les archives de l’époque coloniale ?

YG : La France ne lèvera pas le voile sur l’ensemble des archives de l’époque coloniale car les archives sont soumises à une législation stricte qui limite l’accès à certains documents. Cette législation ne changera pas pour le cinquantenaire de l’indépendance de l’Algérie. La limitation dépend de la date d’émission du document et de la nature de ce document. Des autorisations de consultation de documents n’ayant pas encore atteint le délai légal de communicabilité peuvent être accordées, grâce une demande de dérogation. Cependant, une partie des archives de la période coloniale resteront surement encore assez longtemps inaccessibles

MS : Pensez-vous que l’accès aux archives par les historiens algériens n’est pas otage d’un favoritisme tendancieux par les autorités françaises ?

YG : Il m’est difficile de répondre à cette question car je ne sais pas quels sont les critères précis permettant d’accorder ou de refuser les demandes de dérogations autorisant l’accès aux archives non librement consultables. La seule chose que je peux dire c’est qu’au cours de mes recherches, la grande majorité des demandes de dérogations que j’ai déposées, ont reçu une réponse favorable. Après, il est évident que si les archives étaient totalement ouvertes cela faciliterait le travail des historiens et écarterait tout soupçon sur la politique menée par les autorités françaises en la matière.

MS : Les restes mortuaires de dizaines de résistants algériens à la colonisation française, dont ceux de Chérif Boubaghla (mort en 1854) et de Cheikh Bouziane des Zaâtchas (mort en 1849), ont été retrouvés au Muséum national d’histoire naturelle (MNHN) de Paris existent-t-il d’autre restes mortuaires ?

YG : Je ne sais pas s’il existe d’autres dépouilles de défunts mais cela pourrait constituer le travail d’une commission d’historiens qui aurait pour mission de faire la lumière sur cette question.

MS : Quelle lecture faites-vous des travaux des historiens qui essayent de mettre sur le même pied d’égalité les crimes de l’armée française avec les dépassements commis par le FLN ?

YG : Tout d’abord, établir une telle égalité marque une absence de rigueur méthodologique qui est difficilement compatible avec l’histoire. Il s’agit plus d’un discours idéologique que d’autre chose. Ce discours vise à mettre les colonisateurs et les colonisés au même niveau en effaçant les rapports de domination réels existants dans l’Algérie coloniale. Il élude la domination coloniale et la violence qu’elle charrie puisque la colonisation est d’abord un acte de violence. Les victimes et les bourreaux s’équivaudraient dans la répression et les massacres. Pour ce faire, ce discours idéologique met systématiquement en avant le massacre de Mélouza qui équivaudrait presque à l’ensemble des crimes commis par l’armée française. Si nous analysons sérieusement les faits, ce discours d’idéologie ne repose sur aucun élément solide.

MS : On parle d’un courant qui pousse vers un néocolonialisme en France peut-on avoir plus de détails sur ce sujet notamment dans les sphères officielles ?

YG : Malgré la décolonisation, l’idéologie coloniale reste majoritaire en France ce qui est « normal » au vu du passé de ce pays. Au sortir de la colonisation, Frantz Fanon disait que la question n’était pas de savoir si la France était raciste, mais de se demander s’il était possible que la France ne soit pas raciste en ayant été la puissance coloniale qu’elle a été. On peut poser la même question au sujet du néocolonialisme : la France peut-elle être autre chose qu’une nation néocolonialiste, notamment dans les relations qu’elle entretient avec le Maghreb et l’Afrique subsaharienne, au vu de son histoire coloniale ?

Au-delà de cette perspective historique qui marque la politique française depuis plus de cinquante ans, il est clair que le gouvernement français actuel mène une politique néocolonialiste particulièrement agressive. Ces derniers mois, la France est « intervenue » militairement en Côte d’Ivoire et en Libye, au nom des « droit de l’homme » et de la « démocratie » comme hier elle colonisait au nom de sa « mission civilisatrice ». Fin mai, Nicolas Sarkozy a affirmé que la France garderait « toujours » des forces militaires en Côte d’Ivoire comme si ce pays n’était pas une nation souveraine. Toutefois, si la politique néocolonialiste de Nicolas Sarkozy est particulièrement agressive, elle s’inscrit dans la continuité de celle de ses prédécesseurs.

De fait, la question serait : la France actuelle peut-elle rompre définitivement avec le néo-colonialisme ? Les rapports de force actuellement à l’œuvre dans la société française me poussent à répondre négativement à cette question, au moins pour les années à venir.

MS : Quelle lecture faites-vous des relations algéro-françaises depuis 1962 ?

YG : Depuis 1962, les relations entre l’Algérie et la France sont marquées par l’importance qu’a l’Algérie dans l’approvisionnement de la France en gaz et en pétrole. Comme le secteur des hydrocarbures représente plus de 90% de l’ensemble des recettes d’exportation de l’Algérie cela place l’économie algérienne dans une position de dépendance vis-à-vis du pétrole et du gaz. De fait, depuis 1962, les relations entre la France et l’Algérie sont passées par des phases plus ou moins bonnes mais elles restent toujours structurées par la question des hydrocarbures.

A côté de la question des hydrocarbures, la France s’efforce de maintenir sa langue et sa culture en Algérie comme elle le fait dans tous les pays qu’elle a colonisés. Pour cela, la France s’appuie sur une « élite comprador francophile » qui est son meilleur relais. Cette « élite » est une garantie de la préservation des intérêts politiques, économiques et culturels français en Algérie.

MS : Comment percevez-vous les multiples visites de responsables, officiels et officieux, français à Alger ?

YG : Ces visites doivent être mises en relation avec l’importance que représente le marché algérien pour la France. En raison du dynamisme de son économie, l’Algérie est un marché très intéressant. Les réserves de change de l’Algérie dépassent les 150 milliards de dollars, le PIB par habitant et par an atteint les 4000 dollars et en 2010 l’Algérie a connu une croissance d’un peu plus de 4%. A un moment où l’économie française « stagne », l’argent du pétrole algérien suscite beaucoup d’intérêt au sein des décideurs économiques et politiques français.

Les exportations françaises vers l’Algérie ont plus que doublé ces dix dernières années même si durant cette période les parts de marché de la France en Algérie ont reculé de 25% à 15%. Sur le marché algérien la France est maintenant concurrencée par des pays tels que la Chine.

Les récentes visites servent essentiellement à préserver les intérêts économiques français en Algérie. En donnant le titre de « Monsieur Algérie » à l’ancien premier ministre Jean-Pierre Raffarin, Nicolas Sarkozy lui aurait affirmé qu’il voulait « 50 milliards de dollars des 186 » que l’Algérie dépense pour la réalisation de son plan quinquennal. Même si l’anecdote est difficilement vérifiable, elle exprime bien les intentions du gouvernement français vis-à-vis de l’Algérie.

MS : Les responsables français renvoient systématiquement vers le futur la reconnaissance des crimes coloniaux commis par la France. Peut-il y avoir une véritable réconciliation entre les deux pays sans reconnaissance de ces crimes ?

YG : Le fait que les responsables français renvoient systématiquement vers le futur la reconnaissance des crimes coloniaux commis par la France, est une manière pour eux d’esquiver cette question gênante. Comme sur le fond ils sont opposés à cette reconnaissance, ils pensent qu’en repoussant cette question l’Algérie finira par arrêter de la poser avec le temps. Ils parient sur l’oubli de l’histoire. Cependant, ce calcul est vain car nous voyons qu’avec le temps l’histoire ne s’efface pas de la mémoire des peuples.

Ce pari sur l’oubli est d’autant plus mauvais que la question de la reconnaissance des crimes de la colonisation ne se pose pas uniquement au niveau international dans les relations entre l’Algérie et la France. Elle se pose aussi en politique intérieure française puisque de nombreuses associations ou mouvements de l’immigration exigent cette reconnaissance. Cette revendication de la reconnaissance des crimes coloniaux par les associations ou mouvements de l’immigration s’est faite essentiellement autour de la commémoration des massacres du 8 mai 1945 et du 17 octobre 1961.

Sur le fond du problème, il ne peut évidemment pas y avoir de véritable « réconciliation » entre les deux pays sans qu’il y ait au préalable une reconnaissance des crimes passés. L’exigence de justice et de vérité est un préalable incontournable à l’établissement de nouveaux rapports entre la France et l’Algérie. Sans justice, il ne peut pas y avoir de véritable paix.

Site du journal El Bilad : http://www.elbiladonline.net/Portal/index.htm




The end of Times according to the Noble Quran and the Sunnah (prophetic tradition)



Abu-Suleyman3:49 AMNo comments


Al Qu'ran And Akhir Al Zaman (End of Times)

By ‪Sheikh Imran Hosein‬,





 

Share: 




 
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook







Related Posts:






Former Police Intelligence Analyst Sacked For Calling 7/7 “A Monstrous Lie”



Abu-Suleyman10:12 AMNo comments




A former police intelligence analyst has gone public with his views that the July 7 London Bombings were a “monstrous lie, perpetrated by our own intelligence agencies, with clear Government complicity”, causing his career to take a sudden downturn. 






Tony Farrell used to be the Principal Intelligence Analyst of South Yorkshire Police…that was until he stumbled upon the mountains of research that suggests 7/7 and the 9/11 attacks in America, at the very least were allowed to happen on purpose, as a pretext for the wider New World Order agenda in the Middle East.



“Last September I was dismissed after 17 years service because of my incompatible beliefs,” Mr. Farrell told WideShut. 





Because he no longer bought the official 7/7 story theorized by the Government, when tasked with his yearly assignment in to the UK’s threat level he had to take a different stance.





“Basically because I did not believe the official versions of the attacks of 9/11 and 7/7, I refused to be perpetuate the lies in my assignment”, part of which included the threat of homegrown Islamic extremists, those deemed solely behind the 7/7 attacks, despite a string of dubious links to the intelligence services themselves.





Instead….on July 8th, 2010, Mr. Farrell handed in his assessment, this year claiming the biggest threat to society wasn’t Muslim terrorists, but those behind the New World Order.




“This stance led to my dismissal,” he concluded.



He was dismissed without any allegations of misconduct, rather a statement that his views were incompatible with the rest of the team. 





The Director of Finance said:

“It is a very sad occasion as you have done some excellent work for South Yorkshire Police and I have never been involved in a situation like today. Your beliefs are very sincere and you may be right, but it is I’m afraid incompatible at the moment with where we are.” [1]





Mr. Farrell has appealed the dismissal and the final hearings of the Tribunal will be heard in early September 2011. 





For further details here is Tony Farrell on the Rich Planet show:
http://blip.tv/richplanetnet/the-richplanet-starship-tony-farrell-5357232

http://wideshut.co.uk/former-police-intelligence-analyst-sacked-for-calling-77-a-monstrous-lie/





Takkiedine est le lien direct entre Sarkozy, Israel et l'assassinat de Rafik Hariri, coupable avec certains pakistanais, et saoudiens d'avoir detourné toutes les retro-commissions des contrats, Miksa, Sawari 2 (Arabie Saudite), Agosta (Pakistan) dans les reseaux chiraco-hariristes au moyen orient. Apres l'elimination de Hariri, les fonds ont pu etre recupérés par les reseaux 'K' pour Kaddafi et l'emir du Qatar... Ces fonds etaient destinés a Sarkozy en 2007, et les malettes (36 millions d'euros passaient par la Libye et l'Italie, voir affaire de diversion 'Clearstream' et les comptes 'Nagy de Bocsa' en Italie, affaire montée de toute piece par ceux la meme qui declaraient en etre les victimes. Berlusconi a confirmé que les malettes se passaient de la main a la main comme le fiston Kaddafi avait decrit et Takkiedine aurait du etre arreté depuis longtemps). Quand Israel assassina Hariri car Olmert-Shalom avaient recu des assurances de recuperer une grande partie des fonds pour leur coup de main, Sarkozy serait sur de passer en 2007 ! Sarkozy avait plusieurs mobiles pour guerroyer en Libye dont celui-ci, effacer toutes les traces or meme le mafieux Berlusconi a confirmé cette version des faits ! Kaddafi et Berlusconi vont-ils etre assassinés par l'OTAN ?



Abu-Suleyman7:17 AMNo comments





Les documents Takieddine: le financier secret qui met en danger le clan Sarkozy

 

Les révélation explosives de Médiapart:



 



 



Takieddine, cet homme est une bombe à retardement pour le clan Sarkozy.



Connu pour être le principal suspect dans le volet financier de l’affaire Karachi, Ziad Takieddine est bien plus que cela. Mediapart est en mesure d'affirmer qu'il est devenu à partir de 2002 un conseiller occulte et un financier de l’ombre au cœur du sarkozysme, de la conquête du pouvoir jusqu'à aujourd'hui, selon de nombreux documents exclusifs que nous nous sommes procurés.








Dans ce premier volet d’une série d’articles que nous allons consacrer à Ziad Takieddine, Mediapart dévoile plusieurs photos inédites qui attestent de liens jusqu'ici insoupçonnés, pour certains cachés, de l’homme d’affaires franco-libanais avec le premier cercle du chef de l’Etat. Sont concernés: l’ancien ministre de l’intérieur Brice Hortefeux, l'ancien conseiller de Sarkozy, Thierry Gaubert, l'actuel secrétaire général de l’UMP et ex-ministre du budget, Jean-François Copé, Dominique Desseigne, le patron du Fouquet's, où Nicolas Sarkozy a célébré sa victoire à l'élection présidentielle en mai 2007.



 



De nombreuses notes font également état de relations suivies avec Claude Guéant, proche de toujours de Nicolas Sarkozy et aujourd'hui ministre de l'intérieur. D'autres encore concernent très directement la politique libyenne de réconciliation spectaculaire avec le régime Kadhafi, sur fond de grands contrats, alors que le parlement doit se prononcer mardi sur la guerre aujourd'hui menée.



 



Mediapart peut également révéler que M. Takieddine a reçu, entre 1997 et 1998, 91 millions d’euros pour la vente de frégates à l’Arabie Saoudite, validée en novembre 1994 par Nicolas Sarkozy en tant que ministre du budget. Et ce n'est pas tout: à partir de l'année 2003, Ziad Takieddine aurait par ailleurs consacré 11,8 millions euros à ce qui est décrit comme des «paiements secrets» en provenance de comptes offshore, selon des documents à notre disposition.
 



Brice Hortefeux et Ziad Takieddine.© Photo Mediapart

 

Source: http://www.mediapart.fr/journal/international/100711/les-documents-takieddine-le-financier-secret-qui-met-en-danger-le-clan-?utm_source=Mediapart



Le financier secret qui met en danger le clan Sarkozy









Ziad Takieddine et Jean-François Copé au Liban.© Photo Mediapart




 



 



FABRICE ARFI ET KARL LASKE






source et suite de l'article www.mediapart.fr



Cet homme est une bombe à retardement pour le clan Sarkozy. Connu pour être le principal suspect dans le volet financier de l’affaire Karachi, Ziad Takieddine est bien plus que cela. Mediapart est en mesure d'affirmer qu'il est devenu à partir de 2002 un conseiller occulte et un financier de l’ombre au cœur du sarkozysme, de la conquête du pouvoir jusqu'à aujourd'hui, selon de nombreux documents exclusifs que nous nous sommes procurés.



Dans ce premier volet d’une série d’articles que nous allons consacrer à Ziad Takieddine, Mediapart dévoile plusieurs photos inédites qui attestent de liens jusqu'ici insoupçonnés, pour certains cachés, de l’homme d’affaires franco-libanais avec le premier cercle du chef de l’Etat. Sont concernés: l’ancien ministre de l’intérieur Brice Hortefeux, l'ancien conseiller de Sarkozy, Thierry Gaubert, l'actuel secrétaire général de l’UMP et ex-ministre du budget, Jean-François Copé, Dominique Desseigne, le patron du Fouquet's, où Nicolas Sarkozy a célébré sa victoire à l'élection présidentielle en mai 2007.



De nombreuses notes font également état de relations suivies avec Claude Guéant, proche de toujours de Nicolas Sarkozy et aujourd'hui ministre de l'intérieur. D'autres encore concernent très directement la politique libyenne de réconciliation spectaculaire avec le régime Kadhafi, sur fond de grands contrats, alors que le parlement doit se prononcer mardi sur la guerre aujourd'hui menée.



Mediapart peut également révéler que M. Takieddine a reçu, entre 1997 et 1998, 91 millions d’euros pour la vente de frégates à l’Arabie Saoudite, validée en novembre 1994 par Nicolas Sarkozy en tant que ministre du budget. Et ce n'est pas tout: à partir de l'année 2003, Ziad Takieddine aurait par ailleurs consacré 11,8 millions euros à ce qui est décrit comme des «paiements secrets» en provenance de comptesoffshore, selon des documents à notre disposition.



 





Brice Hortefeux et Ziad Takieddine.© Photo Mediapart




 



A l’évidence, Ziad Takieddine est l'homme qui sait tout et donc trop! En mars dernier, submergé par la colère, il a ainsi menacé de «faire sauter le gouvernement» lors d’une conversation téléphonique avec son ami Thierry Gaubert, qui est aussi un ancien collaborateur de Nicolas Sarkozy (lire notre enquête sur sa mise en cause dans une affaire de 1% logement en cliquant ici et ici). Des douaniers venaient d’interpeller M. Takieddine à l’aéroport du Bourget, porteur d’1,5 million d’euros en espèces alors qu’il revenait de Libye.



L’homme d’affaires de 61 ans raccompagnait ce jour-là en jet privé des journalistes du Journal du Dimanche partis interviewer le colonel Kadhafi. Placé en garde à vue comme un vulgaire “porteur de valises”, Ziad Takieddine avait expliqué, sans convaincre, que ces fonds correspondaient à «un transfert entre sociétés commerciales». La justice a ouvert une enquête préliminaire pour «manquements aux obligations déclaratives» et «suspicion de blanchiment», dont on est sans nouvelles depuis lors.



 





Z. Takieddine© dr


Mais jeudi 7 juillet, c’est au domicile du même Thierry Gaubert que des policiers de la Division nationale des investigations financières (Dnif) ont mené une perquisition. Pour, encore une fois, suivre la piste de Takieddine De nombreux témoins entendus par les juges Renaud Van Ruymbeke et Roger Le Loire, en charge du volet financier de l’affaire Karachi, l’ont en effet désigné comme l’intermédiaire imposé par le pouvoir balladurien: il s'agissait de s’assurer de substantielles«rétrocommisssions» sur les marchés d’armement signés peu avant la présidentielle de 1995. Rétrocommissions que les juges soupçonnent d'avoir alimenté le financement de la campagne électorale d'Edouard Balladur.

 



Ziad Takieddine a effectivement rencontré Thierry Gaubert lors de la campagne de Balladur. M. Gaubert avait suivi Nicolas Sarkozy de la mairie de Neuilly au ministère du budget – dans de petites fonctions de communication. Dans le même temps, Takieddine s’était également rapproché du couple Léotard qui venait skier dans la station Isola 2000 (Alpes maritimes), station qu’il avait gérée jusqu’en 1992. Les deux hommes avaient partagé bien des secrets de cette campagne électorale.



L’élection perdue, M. Takieddine a néanmoins multiplié par 100 sa surface financière grâce aux marchés d’armement signés en 1994 par le gouvernement Balladur — François Léotard était alors le ministre de la défense.


Le yacht, le marchand d'armes et les ministres
Ziad Takieddine est l’homme d’un clan, qu’il aime réunir pour les grandes occasions. Ainsi, ce 27 juin 2002, il célèbre lors d’un fastueux dîner la victoire de la droite à la présidentielle et aux législatives, qui marque le retour en grâce − et au gouvernement − des ex-balladuriens.
 
Parmi les invités, Renaud Donnedieu de Vabres, ancien membre de l’équipe de campagne de Balladur, ex-ministre aux affaires européennes et futur ministre de la culture; Jean-François Copé, secrétaire d’État aux relations avec le Parlement − qui avait soutenu Chirac en 1995 sans retrouver de place dans le gouvernement Juppé; Brice Hortefeux, alors membre du cabinet du ministre de l’intérieur, Nicolas Sarkozy; Christian Estrosi, alors député; et… Thierry Gaubert, placardisé depuis sa mise en cause dans des affaires immobilières des Hauts-de-Seine. Étienne Mougeotte, alors vice-président de TF1, et Thierry Dassault, l’un des fils du célèbre avionneur, sont aussi invités.
 
Cet aréopage sarkozyste se retrouve régulièrement dans la propriété de Takieddine au cap d’Antibes. En août 2003, Jean-François Copé et Brice Hortefeux et leurs épouses partent ainsi en mer sur La Diva, le yacht de l’homme d’affaires. Voici, ci-dessous, une des photos de cette journée:
 


Ziad Takieddine en compagnie de Brice Hortefeux et Jean-François Copé et leurs épouses. Août 2003.© Photo Mediapart

 
 
«Je ne suis allé qu’une fois ou deux chez lui, explique Brice Hortefeux contacté par Mediapart, et je n’étais pas au gouvernement. Il avait invité tout le monde à un grand dîner. Je suis peut-être sorti en bateau, mais je n’ai pas fait de croisière avec lui.» Certains, comme Jean-François Copé, séjournent longuement dans sa villa du cap d’Antibes, comme en témoigne cette photo ci-dessous datée du 13 août 2003:
 


Jean-François Copé dans la piscine de la villa de Ziad Takieddine.© Photo Mediapart

 
 
Questionné par Mediapart sur ces vacances mais aussi sur d’autres déplacements à Londres, à Venise et à Beyrouth − dont Mediapart a retrouvé la trace −, Jean-François Copé a confirmé que dans le cadre de «relations strictement amicales», «sans aucun lien» avec ses «activités électives ou ministérielles», il avait été à plusieurs reprises «invité» par Ziad Takieddine.
 
Selon nos informations, l’homme d’affaires a effectivement pris en charge, via la société Translebanon, les voyages de Jean-François Copé et de son épouse à Londres puis à Venise, en octobre 2004. Et encore une fois à Londres, en octobre 2005. En octobre 2003, il fait aussi visiter le Liban à celui qui est alors secrétaire d’État des relations avec le Parlement, comme en témoigne une photo ci-dessous:
 


Ziad Takieddine et Jean-François Copé au Liban.© Photo Mediapart

 
 
Lors de ce voyage, l’intermédiaire des frégates saoudiennes et des sous-marins pakistanais dîne d'ailleurs avec le ministre dans la résidence de l’ambassadeur de France. «Ce voyage comportait en effet une partie officielle et une partie amicale», indiquait-on, dimanche 10 juillet, dans l’entourage du patron de l’UMP.
 


Ziad Takieddine, Jean-François Copé et l'ambassadeur Lecourtier.© Photo Mediapart

 
 
À l’époque de ces escapades, Jean-François Copé est ministre et porte-parole du gouvernement. En mars 2004, il devient ministre délégué à l’intérieur, puis en novembre 2004, il obtient le portefeuille du budget. Les documents obtenus par Mediapart font apparaître à la date du 7 avril 2004, un «avoir de la famille Copé» s’élevant à 19.050 euros dans les comptes de l’intermédiaire.
L’équipe de M. Copé n’a pas donné d’explication à Mediapart sur ce point. En particulier, il n’a pas indiqué si cet «avoir» correspondait à un remboursement finalement opéré par le ministre. «On ne voit pas de quoi il s’agit», précise-t-on du côté de l’UMP.

Le clan Sarkozy au grand complet
Sur le même relevé de comptes obtenu par Mediapart, apparaît le nom de Pierre Charon, alors conseiller de Nicolas Sarkozy au ministère de l’intérieur. Une somme tellement modeste qu’on s’étonne qu’elle y figure: 110,13 euros. Un voyage en train? Un taxi? Pierre Charon ne s’en souvient pas, même s’il admet lui aussi avoir rencontré «deux ou trois fois» l’intermédiaire, dont «une fois sur la côte». «C’était une relation commune d’amis autour de Brice», explique-t-il à Mediapart.
 
Une autre promenade en mer sur La Diva réunit Thierry Gaubert et Dominique Desseigne, héritier des casinos Barrière et patron du Fouquet’s, où Nicolas Sarkozy a fêté son élection à la présidence de la République en mai 2007. Dans les années 1980, M. Desseigne avait épousé l’ex-femme de Thierry Gaubert, Diane Barrière, décédée en 2001 des suites d’un grave accident. Voici une photo de cette journée en mer:
 


Ziad Takieddine, Thierry Gaubert (au premier plan) et Dominique Desseigne© Photo Mediapart

 
 
Précision utile: à l’heure de ces invitations, Ziad Takieddine s’emploie à décrocher − moyennant des contrats secrets de commissions − des marchés d’État au ministère de l’intérieur, alors dirigé par M. Sarkozy.
 
Le projet le plus important concerne à ce moment-là la protection des frontières de l’Arabie Saoudite, le “Saudi Border Guards Development Program”. Nom de code: Miksa. Le marché est estimé à 7 milliards d’euros! Seulement voilà, en décembre 2003, l’Élysée intervient pour stopper le ministère de l’intérieur dans ses négociations. Jacques Chirac va même jusqu’à interdire un déplacement préparatoire en Arabie Saoudite et finalement retire le dossier au ministère de l'intérieur.
 
Or, au sein du ministère, le contrat Miksa était géré en direct par deux hommes: Brice Hortefeux et Claude Guéant, en relation étroite avec Ziad Takieddine. «J’ai été en contact avec lui pour cette seule affaire Miksa, qui finalement ne s’est pas faite», assure Brice Hortefeux, qui admet avoir effectué l’un des voyages de négociations en Arabie Saoudite. «Ziad Takieddine avait des contacts avec les autorités, se rappelle l’ancien ministre. Est-ce qu’il a été utile au pays? Peut-être bien…»
 
Le fait est que l’Arabie Saoudite a, dans le passé, porté chance et fortune à Ziad Takieddine. Ainsi, dans l’entrelacs des circuits de commissions occultes mis en place entre 1993 et 1995 sur deux importants marchés d’armement, l’un avec le Pakistan, l’autre avec l’Arabie Saoudite, Ziad Takieddine a joué un rôle crucial.

11,8 millions d'euros de «paiements secrets»...
Ces deux marchés ont ceci de particulier qu’ils ont connu la même destinée une fois Jacques Chirac élu président de la République en 1995. Suspectant les balladuriens de financement occulte via ces contrats, le nouveau chef de l’État a interrompu, à l’été 1996, le versement des commissions restant dues au réseau d’intermédiaires au centre des soupçons. Ce fut une très mauvaise nouvelle pour Ziad Takieddine.
Mais selon des documents inédits auxquels Mediapart a eu accès, l’homme d’affaires franco-libanais a finalement obtenu une partie non négligeable des commissions qu’il attendait de la vente de frégates. Après avoir engagé un processus arbitral, fin 1996, il a pu ainsi obtenir, en trois versements, 130 millions de dollars sur le «compte secret» n° 3585 ouvert à la banque de la Méditerranée à Beyrouth: 75 millions le 7 avril 1997, 25 millions le 31 décembre 1997 et 30 millions le 31 mai 1998.
Ces fonds sont aussitôt répartis sur d’autres offshore, notamment la Estar Ltd, bénéficiaire de plusieurs contrats de “consultants” signés en 1995 avec la Sofresa, un office d’armement appartenant à l’État français. Ziad Takieddine assure aujourd’hui que l’intervention de Rafic Hariri auprès de Jacques Chirac en sa faveur aurait débloqué les paiements.
Cliquez sur le document ci-dessous pour le lire en plein écran:
 


© Mediapart

 
 
De fait, ces arrivées de fonds vont permettre à Ziad Takieddine d’opérer la plupart des achats immobiliers somptueux réalisés à partir de 1998: hôtel particulier à Paris, maison à Londres, villa au cap d’Antibes…
Mais ce n’est pas tout. Un tableau analytique de ses dépenses fait aussi apparaître une rubrique qui est ainsi baptisée: «Paiements secrets». Ces paiements secrets s’élèvent à 11,8 millions d’euros entre 2003 et 2008!
Cliquez sur l'image pour l'agrandir.
 


© Mediapart

 
 
Interrogé, dimanche, par Mediapart sur ces versements secrets et les voyages offerts à des personnalités, Ziad Takieddine a refusé de répondre à nos questions. «Qu’est-ce que vous voulez? Vous voulez abattre un président de la République? Eh bien faites-le, à votre manière, a-t-il commenté. Je n’ai rien à vous dire, sauf vous attaquer.»
 
«Allez donc voir ce que Villepin a touché», a-t-il rétorqué, sans en dire plus. «Je suis un homme propre et vous êtes sale. Vous êtes une des saletés les plus performantes dans la saleté.»








Take down the German Bertelsmann group, Haim Saban group and Murdoch empire and Israel has no more PR machine to brainwash the Western public



Abu-Suleyman3:07 PMNo comments


A Murdoch Note

A Word Or Two on What Isn’t Being Said



By Gordon Duff, 

www.veteranstoday.com 



Today the British papers not owned by Rupert Murdoch “rumored” that he might be jailed.  Americans, even Brits, have little or no idea  what is at risk here.  There is simply no one who can report it when the individual who, not only controls the world’s largest news organization turns out to be, well, what





Who is Rupert Murdoch?



What he is not is an Australian “right wing” billionaire.  Murdoch, though born in Australia is an Israeli citizen and Jewish.  Why is this important?

Murdoch is now admitted to have controlled the political systems in Britain and America for two decades.  He has had the power to choose national leaders, make policy, pass laws at will.  Where did the power come from?



We now know it came from spying, blackmail, bribery and propaganda.

What is his agenda?  Ah, there’s the rub.



Was it about selling newspapers using scandals or spying in the name of Israel to push Britain and the United States into wars for Israel?  There is a simple answer.



Murdoch’s primary motivation isn’t even that he is “for Israel.”  Murdoch is, perhaps, the most influential Israeli, more powerful than Netanyahu.  The problem with that is that his beliefs are what we call “ultra-nationalist.”

This makes him a threat.  Ultra-nationalists are known to support wars, plan terrorist acts, manipulate populations into strife and racism, foster fear and panic, even financial ruin.

What are we describing here?



If you aren’t totally brain dead, you realize I am describing Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh and Fox News.

Murdoch owns Fox News and so much else you may not have a time to look at the list.  If he doesn’t own it he doesn’t want it.

Fox is a network and Murdoch, owning so many newspapers across America and being a foreigner shouldn’t be able to control such a thing.  How did he do it? 



Reagan “appointed” Murdoch an American citizen.  Murdoch promised to have Fox News support Republicans and say whatever was needed, no matter how false, how stupid or, as we  have seen now for decades, how genuinely evil.

What he really did, however, was use Fox as a base to allow Israel to run spy operations. 



These went two ways:



1.  Israel got lots of military technology and secrets they could sell to America’s enemies for money.  This is good “Murdoch” business sense, as we all see now.

2.  Murdoch helped Israel gain control of congress.  They literally run the United States.  The tools?  As in Britain, bribery and blackmail, police, military and congress.

No surprises for anyone.



Murdoch has, in fact, engineered the last 20 plus years of American history, picking politicians, throwing elections, establishing policies.  Were the decisions his own?



I don’t think so.  I think Murdoch represents a group, mostly financial, making up the Rothschild family, the Federal Reserve Banks and organized crime.



There is an Israeli or Jewish aspect to some of this but not in the sense of being “pro” or “anti” Semitic.  The Murdoch empire, married to the “lily white” “no Jews allowed” Republican Party simply put their own very powerful spin on the good old “New World Order,” pushing it into drug running, arms and human trafficking, manipulated international currencies and debt on a massive scale, ran America and the European Union into economic collapse, worked with oil companies to set up price fixing schemes…

This is what Murdoch and his friends have done, all the while pointing their fingers at Osama bin Laden and the evil “liberals.”



They divided Britain, starting at first as “conservatives” and then changed to “liberals.”  What they did in Britain is undermine legal government, destroy the nation and the public’s trust in the government, Blair, Cameron, it doesn’t matter, Murdoch chose both and ran and runs both like hand puppets as he did with Bush and his friends.



The ideas are simple.  Bilk the countries out of every last cent, use a portion to bribe or blackmail politicians, buy police and get even more money.

Then you lie to the people, give them enemies to hate, arrange wars for them to fight and stand back and watch them destroy themselves.

Are there people really this evil?



Yes there are, Murdoch, the gang at his companies, the gang at Fox News, the folks in the US called “neocons,” the Israeli lobby in the US, the ADL, AIPAC and the Likudist faction in Israel run by Netanyahu.

These folks hate the United States.



A similar group hate Britain.  Australia has their own, he runs that place entirely, right into the ground.  He also runs Germany, Canada, he runs much of what was once the “free world.”

Am I describing Satan?



Pretty much.



His strongest advocates, those who have stood with his thieves and liars against all that is decent, all that is good, all that is right is the Evangelical and “Zionist” communities in the United States.  They were and are the “fertile ground” for his message of hate and deceit.



Who does Murdoch claim to hate?



Muslims for sure, they are all bad.  Everything he touches in his hundreds of publications and TV shows or the phony news his gang of cutthroats create, hate of Muslims is always on top.  This pleases his Israeli friends.  If things keep going as they are, he may need to hide out there and Israel will always protect him, maybe plow down a few Palestinian homes to give him a grand estate.  After all, Muslims are an easy target, living in petty dictatorships run by thieves who we have now learned have always run to Washington and Tel Aviv for orders.

Take out a second.  Think the word “Palestinian.”  Do you also think “terrorist?”  Do you see a child being killed by an Israeli helicopter or innocent people killed by a TV villain, almost invariably played by Jewish actors, perhaps a sick “inside joke” of Murdoch’s.



The Islamic people of the world have been played, exploited and crushed since 1919.  History will show it carefully planned and financed by a certain European banking family, one that 6 years earlier had established an illegal banking system in the US.



Learn about the real Balfour Declaration and how it was gotten through blackmail, learn who wrote it and to whom it was sent.

The story reads exactly like the things that are coming out in Britain day after day.



Murdoch tells his followers to hate “smart people.”  There has to be fear of the educated, the “elites.”  You can’t have rampant racism and blind ignorance until you destroy public trust in the natural leaders, until you destroy real culture and replace it with mechanized music, scandal mongering, dirty sex and endless conspiracies.



Murdoch is the real king of conspiracy theories. 



Look at the endless list of wild accusations that came from Fox alone.  Then look at the others, the accusations, the wild and insane things that were written into history but likely planned by Murdoch.

9/11 probably had Murdoch’s hand in it as did the London bombings on 7/7.

There could be no great conspiracy without control of the news.



Now we find the news itself controlled the governments and may well have written the scripts to the wars, the rigged elections, the acts of terror and the misdirection that sent America into a decade of cruel and useless bloodletting after terror groups that never existed in the first place.



Now, today, as our British cousins are reeling in the revelations that their government for decades has not been their own, a diseased hybrid of crazy old man, Israeli spies and the paid stooges that the people thought were serving them….



And it goes on in America, full blast, Murdoch and his creatures, planning the future of America.

One of his creatures is Boehner.



Another is Palin.

Then there is Gingrich.

There was the entire Bush administration.

But, to get to the dark heart of evil, first you look at Fox News



http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/07/13/a-murdoch-note/