Monnaie Sunnah c'est le Khilafa retabli: Dinar d'Or et Dirham d'Argent: Pour une conception monétaire francaise contact au bas de la page
"La monnaie papier est une tromperie. Elle est utilisée comme un moyen de nous dépouiller de nos biens. La monnaie continue de chuter...
Le système bancaire est un crime et les banquiers sont des criminels. Le système actuel est présenté comme le seul possible mais il n'est pas seulement viable, il est injuste et il détruit l'économie.
Ce que nous essayons aujourd'hui, c'est de rendre l'argent aux banques en gardant l'or et l'argent pour le peuple. Les gens auront ainsi accès aux vraies richesses"
Combattons Riba!!!
info france dinar dirham:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCiJtubwnfalb0spyK8B8JaQ
info source (anglais):
http://www.islamicmint.com/
http://www.muamalahcouncil.com/
pour acheter:
http://www.nubex.com.my/ (malaisie)
http://wakalanusantara.com/index.php?lang=en (indonésie)
http://www.dinarexchange.co.uk/ (angleterre)
pour créer un reseau, suivre cet exemple
http://www.dinardirham.org/ (anglais)
pour une conception monétaire francaise envoyer un email
france.dinar.dirham@gmail.com
http://www.islamicmint.com/setup/index.html
Qui suivre, qui combattre en ces temps troubles de manipulations? Faut-il suivre les mensonges de la secte talmudiste de la franc-maconnerie et sa democratie qui n'a jamais existe, sa laicite, qui n'a jamais existe, ses libertes, qui n'ont jamais existe, ses droits, qui n'ont jamais existe? La secte talmudo-sioniste de la franc maconnerie prepare la venue de son maitre, le machiah, ou Antechrist-Dajjal et prepare le genocide de ceux d'entre nous qui suivons la lignee des prophetes envoyes a l'Humanite de Adam au Sceau des prophetes Muhammad saws, sa Sunnah et les commandements divins du Quran. Ce sont les seuls armes capables de vaincre le Dajjal et sa secte talmudo-sioniste.
Nouvel avertissement du Sheykh Salah-Eddine Ibn Ibrahim Abu Arafat depuis le coeur de la mosquee d'Al Aqsa a Jerusalem sur les imposteurs de la communaute Musulmane qui combattent pour le Dajjal a l'insu de leur plein gre!
Pax Talmudica 2012 : Netanyahu is deeply involved in the black market trade of nuclear material according to the FBI. What were the links between the Litvinenko affair, Israel, and the next 911 israeli nuclear false flag in Europe?
Netanyahu Worked Inside Nuclear Smuggling Ring
by Grant Smith, July 04, 2012
Counterespionage debriefing reveals how Israel targeted U.S.
On June 27, 2012, the FBI partially declassified and released seven additional pages [.pdf] from a 1985–2002 investigation into how a network of front companies connected to the Israeli Ministry of Defense illegally smuggled nuclear triggers out of the U.S.* The newly released FBI files detail how Richard Kelly Smyth — who was convicted of running a U.S. front company — met with Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel during the smuggling operation. At that time, Netanyahu worked at the Israeli node of the smuggling network, Heli Trading Company. Netanyahu, who currently serves as Israel’s prime minister, recently issued a gag order that the smuggling network’s unindicted ringleader refrain from discussing “Project Pinto.”
As revealed in previously released FBI files and the tell-all book Confidential: The Life of Secret Agent Turned Hollywood Tycoon Arnon Milchan, the Hollywood producer was recruited into Israel’s economic espionage division (LAKAM) in his 20s and learned how to establish front companies and secret bank accounts for smuggling operations. Arnon Milchan encouraged Smyth, a California engineer, to incorporate MILCO in 1972 and serve as a front for the Israel-based Heli Trading’s (also known as Milchan Limited) acquisitions of sensitive military technologies on behalf of the Ministry of Defense. Smyth fled the U.S. after being indicted for violating the Arms Export Control Act in the mid-1980s. In July 2001, Smyth was arrested in Spain by Interpol and returned to the U.S., and in November, he was convicted of exporting 800 nuclear triggers (called krytrons).
FBI agents interviewed Smyth on April 16-17, 2002, at the U.S. attorney’s office in Los Angeles. The secret interview report details how during a trip to Israel Smyth was “spotted” by Milchan, who claimed he worked as an exclusive purchasing agent for the Ministry of Defense. Smyth was introduced around to high military officials including then-general Ariel Sharon. Smyth was also put in contact with Benjamin Netanyahu, who worked at Heli Trading Company. According to the FBI report, “Smyth and [Netanyahu] would meet in restaurants in Tel Aviv and in [Netanyahu's] home and/or business. It was not uncommon for [Netanyahu] to ask Smyth for unclassified material.”
Milchan pulled Smyth into his glamorous, star-studded movie circuit. “While in the United States [Smyth] met with [Milchan] numerous times in Los Angeles. … Milchan and Smyth would have dinner frequently and would visit one another’s house often … it was quite common for [Milchan] to invite [Smyth] to various Hollywood parties and introduce [Smyth] to celebrities.”
During the 2002 Smyth counterintelligence debriefing, the FBI learned that the Ministry of Defense ordered and paid Heli Trading for krytrons. Heli in turn sourced them from MILCO in a clandestine operation codenamed Project Pinto. The report reveals how MILCO illegally shipped prohibited articles under general Commerce Department export licenses rather than smuggling them out via Israeli diplomatic pouches. The last time Smyth saw Milchan was in 1985. The Ministry of Defense issued a burn notice on Smyth after discussions with U.S. officials about the krytron smuggling. According to the FBI report, “Shortly thereafter, [Smyth] fled the United States.”
A March 2012 statement by the co-authors of Confidential claims that “Hollywood mega-producer and former secret agent Arnon Milchan has been asked directly by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Shimon Peres to avoid any public discussion of the book Confidential, asserting that the matter is too sensitive at this time.” Although the book’s authors point to the escalating tensions over Iran’s nuclear program, Netanyahu’s own hands-on involvement in nuclear weapons–related covert action against America is presumably a far more compelling reason for the gag order.
* The FBI referred an additional 164 pages of the Mandatory Declassification Review to another government agency — presumably the CIA — for further review. The additional pages will likely never be released. The CIA has refused requests for similar documents in order to preserve intelligence sources and methods abroad.
As revealed in previously released FBI files and the tell-all book Confidential: The Life of Secret Agent Turned Hollywood Tycoon Arnon Milchan, the Hollywood producer was recruited into Israel’s economic espionage division (LAKAM) in his 20s and learned how to establish front companies and secret bank accounts for smuggling operations. Arnon Milchan encouraged Smyth, a California engineer, to incorporate MILCO in 1972 and serve as a front for the Israel-based Heli Trading’s (also known as Milchan Limited) acquisitions of sensitive military technologies on behalf of the Ministry of Defense. Smyth fled the U.S. after being indicted for violating the Arms Export Control Act in the mid-1980s. In July 2001, Smyth was arrested in Spain by Interpol and returned to the U.S., and in November, he was convicted of exporting 800 nuclear triggers (called krytrons).
FBI agents interviewed Smyth on April 16-17, 2002, at the U.S. attorney’s office in Los Angeles. The secret interview report details how during a trip to Israel Smyth was “spotted” by Milchan, who claimed he worked as an exclusive purchasing agent for the Ministry of Defense. Smyth was introduced around to high military officials including then-general Ariel Sharon. Smyth was also put in contact with Benjamin Netanyahu, who worked at Heli Trading Company. According to the FBI report, “Smyth and [Netanyahu] would meet in restaurants in Tel Aviv and in [Netanyahu's] home and/or business. It was not uncommon for [Netanyahu] to ask Smyth for unclassified material.”
Milchan pulled Smyth into his glamorous, star-studded movie circuit. “While in the United States [Smyth] met with [Milchan] numerous times in Los Angeles. … Milchan and Smyth would have dinner frequently and would visit one another’s house often … it was quite common for [Milchan] to invite [Smyth] to various Hollywood parties and introduce [Smyth] to celebrities.”
During the 2002 Smyth counterintelligence debriefing, the FBI learned that the Ministry of Defense ordered and paid Heli Trading for krytrons. Heli in turn sourced them from MILCO in a clandestine operation codenamed Project Pinto. The report reveals how MILCO illegally shipped prohibited articles under general Commerce Department export licenses rather than smuggling them out via Israeli diplomatic pouches. The last time Smyth saw Milchan was in 1985. The Ministry of Defense issued a burn notice on Smyth after discussions with U.S. officials about the krytron smuggling. According to the FBI report, “Shortly thereafter, [Smyth] fled the United States.”
A March 2012 statement by the co-authors of Confidential claims that “Hollywood mega-producer and former secret agent Arnon Milchan has been asked directly by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Shimon Peres to avoid any public discussion of the book Confidential, asserting that the matter is too sensitive at this time.” Although the book’s authors point to the escalating tensions over Iran’s nuclear program, Netanyahu’s own hands-on involvement in nuclear weapons–related covert action against America is presumably a far more compelling reason for the gag order.
* The FBI referred an additional 164 pages of the Mandatory Declassification Review to another government agency — presumably the CIA — for further review. The additional pages will likely never be released. The CIA has refused requests for similar documents in order to preserve intelligence sources and methods abroad.
http://original.antiwar.com/smith-grant/2012/07/03/netanyahu-worked-inside-nuclear-smuggling-ring/
Israel has the full control over the MI5, MI6, the Metropolitan Police in London, Scotland Yards and David Cameron's cabinet.
ISRAEL KILLED LITVINENKO, WORKING FOR THE MI6 AT THAT TIME, ON THE NBC BLACK MARKET. LITVINENKO MOST PROBABLY WARNED THE RUSSIANS ABOUT A FALSE FLAG COMING USING RUSSIAN NUCLEAR MATERIAL. TO ERASE THE EVIDENCES LEADING TO ISRAEL, UK WAS AWARDED WITH THE OLYMPICS GAME IN LONDON IN 2005. BUT VERY FEW UNDERSTOOD AT THAT TIME THAT THE NEXT NUCLEAR 911 WAS TO TAKE PLACE IN LONDON. NETANYAHU HAD BEEN THE TARGET OF THE BRITONS WHO SET UP AN AL ALJAZEERA INVESTIGATION WHERE THEY EXPLICITLY BLAME SHARON, BARAK AND NETANYAHU FOR HAVING KILLED ARAFAT WITH POLONIUM. BUT THE SUBLIMINAL MESSAGE HERE IS THAT 'ISRAEL KILLED LITVINENKO, LIKE ARAFAT'. THE FBI RELEASED PARTIALLY ON THE 27 JUNE 2012, WHICH IS EXTREMELY RARE, OTHER PIECES OF THE PUZZLE CONFIRMING THAT NETANYAHU WAS DEEPLY INVOLVED IN THE NBC BLACK MARKET. NO COINCIDENCES! ISRAEL IS CONSPIRING TO START HER EMANCIPATING WORLD WAR, A MESSIANIC NUCLEAR BIOLOGICAL CHEMICAL WORLD WAR, WHERE THE 'MOSCHIAH' (ANTICHRIST-DAJJAL) IS TO APPEAR TO RULE THE WORLD FROM JERUSALEM. THESE WERE MOSSADNIK SARKOZY'S BELIEFS AND THESE ARE THE BELIEFS OF DAVID CAMERON AND ANGELA MERKEL IN EUROPE, MAKE NO MISTAKES ABOUT IT.
HOW ISRAEL BOMBED LONDON ON THE 7TH JULY 2005.
RIPPLE EFFECT 2 AN UPDATED VERSION
Muad'Dib's latest film about the July 7 2005 London bombings.
After being unlawfully jailed for 157 days based on trumped-up charges, and the BBC making a dedicated hit-piece on the original 7/7 Ripple Effect, the film-maker Muad'Dib expands upon the original film and has added over 60 minutes of new material connecting the dots of what most likely really did happen in London on July 7th 2005, when 3 tube-trains and a double-decker bus were exploded.
Watching this film should leave the viewer no doubt that the crimes and murder committed in London were done by other organizations than by claimed by the official and corporate media.
"I must say, in my opinion this is a masterpiece. In less than an hour, the film explains how this whole event was planned, how it was staged, what went wrong, how the authorities sought to cover it up and the failure of the press to cover it adequately. I think it is as marvellous a microcosm for understanding the nature of inside-jobs as anyone has ever produced, so I must congratulate you and tell you how much I admire your work."
- James H. Fetzer, professor emeritus at the University of Minnesota about the original 7/7 Ripple EFfect.
"It is an example of critical journalism that draws wholly on public news sources to formulate a controversial, but plausible, theory. After deploying three different theories of truth to develop insights into new and existing evidence, it is the BBC / Government theory that has a lower level of correspondence with known facts, is incoherent to the point of being implausible, and is more likely to distort its reports because of institutional controls and political pressures."
- Rory Ridley-Duff Ph.D., senior lecturer in human resource management and organisation behaviour, Sheffield Hallam University.
After being unlawfully jailed for 157 days based on trumped-up charges, and the BBC making a dedicated hit-piece on the original 7/7 Ripple Effect, the film-maker Muad'Dib expands upon the original film and has added over 60 minutes of new material connecting the dots of what most likely really did happen in London on July 7th 2005, when 3 tube-trains and a double-decker bus were exploded.
Watching this film should leave the viewer no doubt that the crimes and murder committed in London were done by other organizations than by claimed by the official and corporate media.
"I must say, in my opinion this is a masterpiece. In less than an hour, the film explains how this whole event was planned, how it was staged, what went wrong, how the authorities sought to cover it up and the failure of the press to cover it adequately. I think it is as marvellous a microcosm for understanding the nature of inside-jobs as anyone has ever produced, so I must congratulate you and tell you how much I admire your work."
- James H. Fetzer, professor emeritus at the University of Minnesota about the original 7/7 Ripple EFfect.
"It is an example of critical journalism that draws wholly on public news sources to formulate a controversial, but plausible, theory. After deploying three different theories of truth to develop insights into new and existing evidence, it is the BBC / Government theory that has a lower level of correspondence with known facts, is incoherent to the point of being implausible, and is more likely to distort its reports because of institutional controls and political pressures."
- Rory Ridley-Duff Ph.D., senior lecturer in human resource management and organisation behaviour, Sheffield Hallam University.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwyzpzEgUWE&feature=player_embedded
Operation Merah : Les mythomanes racistes et incompetents de la DCRI ont mis 4 mois pour mettre au point des bandes sons plus que douteuses
Ce mercredi 4 Juillet 2012, l'etat francais et sa justice totalement corrompue et a la solde de loges maconniques israeliennes entreprennent de liberer un des opposants majeur au regime des criminels de guerre algeriens et leurs mentors des services francais. Le Dr Mourad Dhina est considere par les services francais comme un ennemi a abattre, comme tout Musulman. Les services francais ne sont que les barbouzes et criminels issus des differentes obediences maconniques francaises qui ont mis en place la colonisation et la France-Israel-Algerie.
Dans le meme temps, une delegation francaise s'est rendue discretement et secretement a Alger. Parmi cette delegation des tres haut grades du ministere de l'interieur francais, la defense, des affaires etrangeres.
Pourquoi la France ressent-elle le besoin d'envoyer une delegation a Alger le 4 Juillet 2012?
Pourquoi Ayrault a demande aux medias francais de ne pas couvrir le voyage de cette delegation francaise?
Etait-ce pour finaliser un accord sur le Mali et reparer les fautes de Sarkozy qui avec Mangoux provoqua le coup d'etat en Mars 2011?
Ou etait-ce pour trouver un accord pour liberer les 7 agents du DRS de l'ambassade de Gao, detenus par un groupe totalement sous la coupe de la DGSE?
Etait-ce pour negocier sur l'operation Merah et les bandes sons detenues par le DRS qui cherche a obtenir la liberation de ses otages et qui souhaite egalement cacher ses operations dans le Maghreb-Sahel pour le compte des USA, et l'OTAN?
Hollande et Ayrault couvrent-ils le demantelement du Maghreb-Sahel, strategie deliberee de la politique europeene de voisinage, qui implique la destruction des etats nations pour les rattacher la region au bloc economique europeen et les soumettre au diktat israelien?
Hollande-Ayrault negocient-ils directement pour sauver les tetes de Sarkozy, Squarcini, Molins, Mangoux, Gueant, Guaino, Hauteclocque et la maison mossad-pasqua?
Apres la multiplication des plaintes contre les services de l'etat, le RAID, la police, pourquoi les 32 heures d'enregistrement ne sont toujours pas remises a la justice? Alors que les bandes sons auraient du etre remises, comme les videos d'Al Jazeera a la justice des le depart?
Pourquoi Hauteclocque a-t-il choisi Sifaoui et TF1, plutot que la justice qu'il pretend servir? Que cache ce manque de cooperation avec un des services de l'etat auquel il appartient?
Pourquoi les familles des victimes n'ont-elles pas acces aux enregistrements de 32 heures et aux video de Aljazeera? Ces bandes sons et enregistrements existent-ils reellement?
Pourquoi Hauteclocque est encore libre? Pourquoi Squarcini et Mangoux sont libres et ne sont pas en detention provisoire pour avoir tenter de manipuler la justice et l'opinion publique par le biais des medias et de journaleux a la botte, tout en evitant soigneusement de passer par cette meme justice?
Pourquoi attendre 4 mois pour diffuser ces extraits? Etait-ce le temps qu'il fallut pour monter les bandes ou le timing etait-il important avant le 12 Juillet 2012?
Quand on sait que les bandes sons et videos attribuees a Oussama Ben Laden se sont toutes revelees etre fausses apres le 14 Decembre 2001 et que la CIA, comme la DCRI, la DGSE et la police francaises ce jour, refusaient systematiquement de faire authentifier les bandes ou videos car se doutant bien que leurs mensonges seraient reveles au grand jour, ce qui fut le cas par un laboratoire suisse.
Lors des attentats de Londres, les 4 suspects avaient participe un an plus tot a 'des exercices anti-terroristes', et avaient empruntes un parcour dans Londres depuis leurs domiciles. Durant cet exercice, des 'videos testament' furent meme preparees, puis utilisees par la suite contre eux. Ceci est clairement demontre dans la video Ripple Effect 2, voir ici. Le MI5 avait pretendu qu'il savait que les 4 suspects etaient en mission 'de reperage', un an avant les attentats, mais ils n'avaient pas ressentis le besoin de les arreter. On sait tous pourquoi aujourd'hui.
Deux des 4 suspects avaient voyage en Afghanistan, Pakistan, Jordanie et.... Israel! Visionnez bien la video Ripple Effect 2, c'est tres bien decrit dedans!
Car cela ressemble fort a l'operation Merah! Si les enregistrements etaient reels, est-il possible, comme pour les attentats de Londres, que Merah et ses officiers de tutelle aient simules un enregistrement durant l'un de ces 'exercices anti-terroristes' mais plusieurs mois avant les attaques de Montauban et Toulouse? Car en ecoutant bien le jeune homme, on a pas l'impression qu'il vient d'abattre trois petits enfants et qu'il est encercle? Pire apres avoir tue les juifs orthodoxes, et trois militaires la semaine d'avant, il s'est tout simplement permis de rentrer chez lui! C'est bizarre comme Squarcini a tout fait pour eviter de mentionner AQMI et de faire de Merah un candidat a l'operation martyre? Pour un membre 'd'Al Qaeda', ca sonne vraiment trop faux. Moi, mais ce n'est que mon humble avis, Squarcini consomme trop d'heroine afghane, tout comme sa 'fine equipe' d'israeliens.
L'avocate du pere de Mohammed Merah viendrait deposer les bandes sons-videos ce 12 Juillet 2012? Pourquoi Hauteclocque ne souhaite pas donner les enregistrements a la justice, comme le ferait l'avocate de la famille Merah et la encore pour eviter toute manipulation, si elles existent?
Mais il semblerait que la delegation de Ayrault ait su negocier et eviter que l'operation Merah ne se transforme en un Nuremberg pour les services francais et que les extraits diffuses ce soir par TF1, soit en fait le denouement final de l'histoire? Nous verrons lorsque l'avocate de la famille Merah deposera effectivement les bandes sons-videos cette semaine et que Aljazeera fera de meme? Et meme dans ce cas, les loges maconniques dans la justice saboteront l'affaire, mais les familles des victimes qui demandent acces aux pieces du dossier, pourraient ne pas marcher dans la combine.
En esperant egalement que les familles des victimes s'inspirent de la resistance et la patience des familles du Karachigate car la France ne survivra pas au terrorisme sioniste longtemps, les Musulmans se defendent legitimement et il est normal que les Musulmans demandent et obtiennent la tete de leurs ennemis qui ont perdu la guerre.
Le demantelement et demembrement du Maghreb-Sahel par la DCRI et la DGSE, OTAN, AFRICOM provoquera une guerre civile en France car les peuples de cette region ont parfaitement compris les mensonges et manipulations des abrutis qui dirigent la France, et l'Europe.
A bon entendeur Salaam,
Abu-Suleyman
Islamic-Intelligence
Pax Talmudica 2012 : Non practising Zionist War Criminal Shimon Peres cancels his trip to the London Olympics. THIS IS NOT GOOD FOR THE LONDONERS! REMEMBER 911!!!
President Shimon Peres cancels Olympics trip over Shabbat observance
LONDON - President Shimon Peres has cancelled his visit to the Olympic Games in London due to the refusal of the Olympic organizing committee to allow him to sleep in the Olympic village over Shabbat night.
The Israeli president, despite not being religious, does not travel publicly on Shabbat and will therefore not be able to attend the Olympic opening ceremony.
The President's office has been working on the visit to London for months. Peres had planned, along with dozens of other heads of state, to watch the opening ceremony in 17 days.
However, when his staff realized that the ceremony will go on for hours and will end at the beginning of Shabbat at sundown on Friday afternoon, they began looking for alternatives to travel back to his hotel by car.
They sent an official request to the organizing committee through the Israeli embassy in London and the Israeli Olympic committee to allow Peres to sleep on Friday night in the Olympic village, by the main stadium, which would allow him to walk from the ceremony.
Sources in the organizing committee were mystified by the president's announcement, since there are at least two suitable hotels at walking distance from the Olympic village.
Despite pressure on the committee and personal messages sent to the chairman, Lord Sebastian Coe, the request was refused by the committee due to the rules that only athletes stay in the Olympic village. Other alternatives were explored including the possibility of transporting Peres by a special Halachically-authorized electric vehicle but these were rejected for logistical and security reasons.
Peres finally decided to forego his trip to London and his office issued today a statement saying that "due to the fact that the opening ceremony of the Olympic games is on Friday evening and there are no hotels in walking distance of the stadium, the president decided to cancel his visit and not desecrate Shabbat. The president wishes good luck to the Israeli athletes."
The President's Office responded to the report saying that "the president is not elevated above anyone else and if there are rules that only athletes can sleep in the Olympic village, we respect that."
Spokesperson for the organizing committee said that they could not comment on travel arrangements of visiting heads of state.
The Israeli president, despite not being religious, does not travel publicly on Shabbat and will therefore not be able to attend the Olympic opening ceremony.
The President's office has been working on the visit to London for months. Peres had planned, along with dozens of other heads of state, to watch the opening ceremony in 17 days.
However, when his staff realized that the ceremony will go on for hours and will end at the beginning of Shabbat at sundown on Friday afternoon, they began looking for alternatives to travel back to his hotel by car.
They sent an official request to the organizing committee through the Israeli embassy in London and the Israeli Olympic committee to allow Peres to sleep on Friday night in the Olympic village, by the main stadium, which would allow him to walk from the ceremony.
Sources in the organizing committee were mystified by the president's announcement, since there are at least two suitable hotels at walking distance from the Olympic village.
Despite pressure on the committee and personal messages sent to the chairman, Lord Sebastian Coe, the request was refused by the committee due to the rules that only athletes stay in the Olympic village. Other alternatives were explored including the possibility of transporting Peres by a special Halachically-authorized electric vehicle but these were rejected for logistical and security reasons.
Peres finally decided to forego his trip to London and his office issued today a statement saying that "due to the fact that the opening ceremony of the Olympic games is on Friday evening and there are no hotels in walking distance of the stadium, the president decided to cancel his visit and not desecrate Shabbat. The president wishes good luck to the Israeli athletes."
The President's Office responded to the report saying that "the president is not elevated above anyone else and if there are rules that only athletes can sleep in the Olympic village, we respect that."
Spokesperson for the organizing committee said that they could not comment on travel arrangements of visiting heads of state.
http://privateinvesigations.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/president-shimon-peres-cancels-olympics.html
Operation Merah: La DGSE libere 3 otages algeriens au Mali, l'avocate de la famille Merah differe la remise des videos a la justice raciste racialiste franc-maconnique talmudo-sioniste 'francaise' qui joue la guerre civile sur ordre du CRIF
Mise a jour Samedi 14 Juillet 2012, 10H38 GMT: La DGSE a libere le reste des otages du DRS au Mali les services francais ont perdu la face, perdront-ils leurs tetes lors de proces? Lire ici. Le juif sioniste Fabius, qui ne fait pas shabbath, est en Algerie pour tenter de repousser pour apres le mois de Ramadan une possible diffusion de bandes sons-images sur l'operation Merah. Il est evident que Valls et Clavar protegent la maison mossad-pasqua et qu'ils sont des agents israeliens. La guerre est toujours possible, a tout moment en France, en cas de nouvelle attaque israelienne dans les pays du Golf, ciblant la marine US, ou un nouveau 11 septembre nucleaire, biologique ou chimique cet ete. Les Musulmans doivent etre prets a se defendre car Hollande a ete elu pour gerer la prochaine operation israelienne en Europe, tout comme Jospin l'avait fait en 2001. On parle ici d'une attaque pouvant faire jusqu'a un million de morts (il y a 200 000 cercueils pouvant contenir jusqu'a 4 corps, prepares pour les jeux olympiques de Londres, il n'y a jamais de fumee sans feu).
Video: Merah sacrifié pour offrir les élections à Sarkozy
Trois des sept 'diplomates' algériens, enlevés, le 6 avril dernier, à Gao, au Mali, par le Mouvement pour l'unicité et le Jihad, en Afrique de l'Ouest (MUJAO), qui est un front cree par les services francais et la juiverie sioniste algerienne, sous la direction de Mangoux a la DGSE, dans le but de provoquer le chaos dans le Maghreb-Sahel, la destruction des Etats-Nations, la regionalisation a outrance, dans le cadre de la 'politique europeene de voisinage', qui n'est que la partie visible de l'agenda sioniste du plan dit Oded Ynon de 1982, qui prevoit l'extension des frontieres d'Israel et la libanisation de tout le monde Arabo-Berbero-Touareg-Musulman et la prise de controle directe des puits de gaz, petrole, et minerais, terres rares.
Notez que le site israelien SITE est tres implique dans la propagande des services a 'passeports francais'. SITE est dirige par un ancien officier du mossad, Rita Katz.
Notez que le site israelien SITE est tres implique dans la propagande des services a 'passeports francais'. SITE est dirige par un ancien officier du mossad, Rita Katz.
Les liens entre les operations de Montauban, Toulouse, l'Essone et le coup d'etat au Mali, la re-election de Sarkozy sont maintenant prouves et l'etat francais, dont le ministere de la justice, joue ouvertement la guerre civile contre l'Islaam en France apres l'echec de la tentative de diversion menee par TF1 dimanche dernier, avec des bandes sons qui sonnent faux tout du long. J'ai meme entendu un certain Bourdin sur RMC dire aux auditeurs outres par le mensonge et la haine de l'etat francais et ses services, de pas demander l'authentification des bandes sons de TF1?!!!!!
A la destabilisation du Maghreb-Sahel, correspond la destabilisation de la France, dont les ministeres de la defense, l'interieur et la justice sont les maitre d'oeuvre, seuls et uniques responsables du chaos. Confier une enquete sur la DCRI a la DCRI ou, 'la police des polices' ou meme des parlementaires, senateurs, sous le sceau du 'secret defense', releve du racisme, du fascisme et du totalitarisme digne de ce qu'un Netanyahu pratique en Palestine occupee ou de ce qu'un Hitler a fait de son temps. Il est clair et evident que la detention administrative sioniste dans les territoires occupes Palestiniens n'est que l'equivalent de 'l'association de malfaiteurs ayant pour but une entreprise terroriste' en France qui permet aux nazis juifs sionistes de l'etat francais de pratiquer une guerre ouverte contre les Musulmans en France sur le model israelien sur la base de leur haine et leur racisme appris et inculques dans les yeshiva francaises et l'aide massive des medias. Les prisonniers politiques Musulmans en France devraient prendre exemple sur les prisonniers Palestiniens et commencer des greves de la faim partout dans les prisons, pour obtenir leur liberation immediate et leurs dedommagements car, la revolution, c'est maintenant!
Resumons, la DGSE libere 3 otages au Mali, pour eviter un scandale sur l'affaire Merah et la DCRI entreprend de diffuser les images des operations de Montauban et Toulouse en ayant change les bandes sons ou vous allez entendre Allah akbar partout. Cette diffusion se fera la veille de la remise des pieces a Paris par l'avocate de la famille Merah.
Valls annonce meme la diffusion des operations pour proteger l'institution, l'etat. La strategie quand il s'agit des Musulmans et de Africains est bien le mensonge total, couvert par l'etat, les partis politiques, le senat, le parlement et une grande partie des medias complices. L'operation Merah est bien un grossier mensonge d'etat, dont le but etait de faire re-elire Sarkozy au second tour.
Valls annonce meme la diffusion des operations pour proteger l'institution, l'etat. La strategie quand il s'agit des Musulmans et de Africains est bien le mensonge total, couvert par l'etat, les partis politiques, le senat, le parlement et une grande partie des medias complices. L'operation Merah est bien un grossier mensonge d'etat, dont le but etait de faire re-elire Sarkozy au second tour.
L'echange entre DRS-DGSE s'est confirme, 'Le Monde' journal des barbouzes sionistes confirme en fin de soiree, dans un tout petit encart, 'l'avocate des Merah ne remet pas les videos a la justice', apres que la DGSE ait liberee 3 otages ce jour meme, lire ici
Mangoux, Hauteclocque, Clavar commettent 2 erreures strategique majeures, la manipulation de TF1 et la liberation des otages algeriens detenus par la DGSE au Mali, qui est en fait derriere le coup d'etat de Bamako en mars 2012. Les liens sont clairement etablis, la publication de videos sur le net provoquera le chaos et la guerre totale en France, car les affaires liant les services francais au coup d'etat de 1992 en Algerie, les liens averes entre l'etat francais et le terrorisme international, avec les GIA, AQMI, le GICM, le GICL et les attentats depuis 40 ans en France, le ras le bol du sionisme et ses mensonges ehontes, ses crimes de guerres, ses attentats, la corruption reignant a tous les etages en France, la haine et la stigmatisation des populations Afro-Maghrebines, conjugues au chomage de masse, la crise sonnent le glas du CRIF et d'Israel en France et en Europe.
Mangoux, Hauteclocque, Clavar commettent 2 erreures strategique majeures, la manipulation de TF1 et la liberation des otages algeriens detenus par la DGSE au Mali, qui est en fait derriere le coup d'etat de Bamako en mars 2012. Les liens sont clairement etablis, la publication de videos sur le net provoquera le chaos et la guerre totale en France, car les affaires liant les services francais au coup d'etat de 1992 en Algerie, les liens averes entre l'etat francais et le terrorisme international, avec les GIA, AQMI, le GICM, le GICL et les attentats depuis 40 ans en France, le ras le bol du sionisme et ses mensonges ehontes, ses crimes de guerres, ses attentats, la corruption reignant a tous les etages en France, la haine et la stigmatisation des populations Afro-Maghrebines, conjugues au chomage de masse, la crise sonnent le glas du CRIF et d'Israel en France et en Europe.
Abu-Suleyman
Islamic-Intelligence Blog
Source de la video: http://www.mohamed-merah.fr/
This Blessed Month of Ramadan Buy Palestinians Dates and Goods
I was shopping for dates for the month of Ramadan and I hardly found Palestinians dates, Medjoul, Jumbo, Cat1, this year in the Muslim shops. But I saw many markets and supermarkets selling israelis dates. You too show support to your community, buy Palestinians dates, oil and all sort of goods to help Palestinians trade their goods and resist the illegal occupation in the Holy lands.
BOYCOTT ISRAELI DATES
KEY FACTS
- Over 50% of the worlds Medjool dates are produced in Israel.
- 60% of Israeli dates are grown on illegal settlement plantations in the Jordan Valley.
- Israeli profits from dates in 2011 = $265 million
If you buy a Medjool date, there’s a strong possibility that it is from an illegal settlement - grown on stolen land.
Palestinian child working in illegal Israeli settlement.
Out of desperate poverty Palestinian families are forced
to take their children out of school and hand them over
to the settlers to work for a pittance
(source: Channel4 news 7 July 2008)
Settlements
Israeli settlements built on stolen Palestinian land have been ruled illegal by the International Court of Justice. Nearly half of the settlements in the Jordan Valley grow dates, its their most profitable crop, and contributes significantly to their economic viability. If you oppose the settlements target their dates.Exploitation
Picking of the dates is hard work, Israeli settlers bring in low payed Palestinian labourers to do this back breaking work. During the pruning season, workers are dropped on the date palm trees by a hoisting crane at 5 in the morning, left perched on palms that soar to heights of 12 metres - a 4 storey building, left there swaying in the wind for up to 8 hours without even a toilet break, with no means to come down until the crane returns at the end of the day, the workers cling to the tree with one arm and work with the other to meet their quota. If they fall behind they will lose their jobs.Child Labour
The Israelis prefer to employ children – even issuing them official work permits, as they can climb trees faster, work for less and it’s easier to cheat and humiliate them. Out of desperate poverty Palestinian families are forced to take their children out of school and hand them over to the settlers to work for a pittance.
Guilty Companies
After a sustained global boycott campaign Israels largest agricultural exporter Agrexco went in to liquidation in 2011.Hadiklaim, the Israeli Date Growers Cooperative, which includes illegal settler plantations in the Jordan Valley, sells 70% of all Israeli dates. Its brand names include Jordan River, King Solomon, Kalahari, Karsten Farms, Tamara Barhi Dates, Desert Diamond, Rapunzel, Bomaja, Shams and Delilah. They also supply Israeli dates to supermarkets who market them under their own brand. These include Marks & Spencer, Sainsbury's, Tesco, Asda and Waitrose. Sometimes they are labelled “produced in the West Bank”, remember these are not Palestinian dates. Hadiklaim also sells South African dates (Karsten Farms), the profits still go to Israel so must be boycotted. Mehadrin, Israel's largest fresh produce exporter, last year boasted of doubling their Medjoul date sales sighting strong demand in Ramadan! Their dates have brand names Premium Medjoul, Fancy Medjoul, Royal Treasure, Red Sea, and Bonbonierra. Sometimes their packaging states "Grown by Palestinian Farmers", this refers to Palestinian 'slave' labourers found on Israeli plantations.
BDS Call
In 2005 Palestinian civil society initiated a call for people of conscience around the world to Boycott, Divest and Sanction Israel until it complies with international law and Palestinian rights. The call was endorsed by over 170 Palestinian organisations representing all aspects of society including farmers.Plea From Palestine
Activists visiting the Palestinian village of Fasayl in the Jordan Valley discovered that villagers are slowly being forced off their land by the Israeli army for settlement expansion. The only livelihood left open to them is to work for Israeli settlements. The Palestinians whose land had been stolen and were forced to work for Agrexco (including 2 children under the age of 12), in order to feed their families – they had a message for the activists, a plea for anyone who would listen – take action against the companies that support Israeli apartheid. What excuse is left for us not to boycott Israel?Help Us Distribute Boycott Israeli Dates Leaflets
Its simple - you don't need to join any groups, just get a couple of friends together, order your free leaflets and start distributing!
With Ramadan rapidly approaching we need your help to get the message out to our people - Do Not Buy Israeli Dates. We need your help to distribute 'Boycott Israeli Dates' leaflets in your Mosques, your campuses, and your communities. Its simple - you don't need to join any organisations or facebook groups, just get a couple of friends together and order your leaflets. The leaflets are sent free of charge, just let us know how many you can distribute and we will send them.
This Ramadan don't just think of the Palestinians, but act!
Our beloved Prophet (SAW) has said "The Ummah are like one body: if the eye is in pain then the whole body is in pain..".
Today Palestine is bleeding..
http://www.inminds.com/boycott-israeli-dates.php
The Government Cover-Up of 9-11 Evidence
By Chris Bollyn,
www.bollyn.com
The following video is an excellent example of how the U.S. government investigation of 9-11 was actually an intentional "non-investigation" that refused to take into consideration any of the evidence of Thermite and explosives that were evidently involved in the demolition of the World Trade Center. The NIST official in this video, Dr. John L. Gross, is clearly complicit in the government cover-up of 9-11.
Dr. John L. Gross is a research structural engineer at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
Dr. John L. Gross was awarded the Department of Commerce Gold Medal in 2005 and Special Act Award in 2008 for his role in the “non-investigation” of the collapses of the Twin Towers, an act of explosive demolition which took nearly three thousand lives.
According to his webpage at NIST, Dr. Gross can be reached at (301) 975-6068 or by email at john.gross@nist.gov
The following video is an excellent example of how the U.S. government investigation of 9-11 was actually an intentional "non-investigation" that refused to take into consideration any of the evidence of Thermite and explosives that were evidently involved in the demolition of the World Trade Center. The NIST official in this video, Dr. John L. Gross, is clearly complicit in the government cover-up of 9-11.
Dr. John L. Gross is a research structural engineer at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
Dr. John L. Gross was awarded the Department of Commerce Gold Medal in 2005 and Special Act Award in 2008 for his role in the “non-investigation” of the collapses of the Twin Towers, an act of explosive demolition which took nearly three thousand lives.
According to his webpage at NIST, Dr. Gross can be reached at (301) 975-6068 or by email at john.gross@nist.gov
9-11 Defendant's Ties to Judge Ignored by U.S. Court of Appeals
July 12, 2012
This bastard judicial system is so corrupt.
- 9/11 widow Ellen Mariani
U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein handled all 9-11 wrongful death lawsuits and tort litigation. Hellerstein, however, has a conflict of interest in the 9-11 litigation: his son is an Israeli lawyer whose law firm works with the Rothschild-funded Mossad "passenger screening" company responsible for the 9-11 terror attacks. This hidden connection explains why Judge Hellerstein worked so hard to protect the Israeli culprits of the false-flag terrorism of 9-11 by preventing a trial for the victims. (NYT photo)
Ellen Mariani, the 9-11 widow who filed the first wrongful death lawsuit related to the terror attacks of September 11, 2001, filed a motion earlier this year with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York seeking to introduce materials into the court record regarding the evident conflict of interest concerning U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, who handled all the 9-11 tort litigation lawsuits. The conflict of interest stems from the fact that the judge's son Joseph lives in Israel where he works as a lawyer for the law firm representing the parent company of ICTS, the key defendant in the 9-11 litigation in Hellerstein's court.
In a summary order handed down by a two-judge panel on June 26, Mariani's motion to supplement the record was denied. The judges concluded that the documents that Mariani's motion sought to introduce "do not reasonably call the district judge's impartiality into question."
To understand the importance of Mariani's motion and the court of appeals decision, we need to understand that one of the key defendants in the 9-11 litigation was the Israeli-owned Huntleigh company that was responsible for passenger screening at the Boston airport on 9-11. This is the company that allowed the knife-wielding terrorists to board the two planes that smashed into the World Trade Center, at least according to the official explanation of events. If 9-11 was a false-flag terror attack, on the other hand, then the Israeli-owned ICTS and its passenger screeing company are part of the terror atrocity and the judge is protecting the true culprits of 9-11.
Judge Hellerstein's decisions in the 9-11 tort litigation effectively protected the Israeli defendants who owned Huntleigh USA by preventing any 9-11 case from going to trial. All of the wrongful death lawsuits were settled out of court. The problem is that Hellerstein's son Joseph works for the Israeli law firm that represents the parent company of ICTS and Huntleigh USA. That presents an obvious conflict of interest, but the Circuit Court judges Peter W. Hall and Susan L. Carney ignored the evidence and may even try to punish Mariani for having brought the motion to the court.
The summary order of Peter W. Hall and Susan L. Carney rejected the evidence of Judge Hellerstein's conflict of interest saying the documented connection was nothing more than "personal slurs" against the judge and his family.
To understand why the court of appeals refused to accept documents that show that Judge Hellerstein is connected through his son to the Israeli defendant in the tort litigation, we need to understand who controls the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Let's start with the chief judge for the court, Dennis G. Jacobs.
Dennis G. Jacobs is the chief judge of the court of appeals.
Jacobs (second from left) at Yeshiva University
Judge Jacobs (front row left with hand icon) participated in a "legal mission to Israel" in 2007...
where he was a "scholar-in-residence" at Hebrew University and met with Israeli politicians and "senior terrorism experts".
That Dennis G. Jacobs would participate in a "legal mission to Israel" with American Friends of the Hebrew University to discuss the "War on Terror" and government powers, visit an Israeli military base, and meet with a "senior terrorism expert," all suggest that Judge Jacobs is an active supporter of both Hebrew University and the state of Israel.
The three-judge panel who decided on the Mariani motion became a two-judge panel when Barrington D. Parker, Jr. recused himself from the panel. The two remaining judges were Peter Welles Hall and Susan Laura Carney.
Peter Welles Hall (center) is the former U.S. Attorney for Vermont.
Susan L. Carney, former legal counsel at Yale University, is married to Lincoln W. Caplan, a member of the New York Times editorial board.
Lincoln Caplan comes from a leading B'nai B'rith family from New Haven and covers the Supreme Court and judicial matters for the New York Times.
The decision to deny the Mariani motion and the harsh words in the summary order and the threats of sanctions against her and her lawyer suggest that there is a hidden hand controlling the judges. That is to say that the decision was made before the panel even saw her motion. Why was Mariani's motion dismissed as "frivolous conduct" when she is simply trying to show that the judge handling the 9-11 tort litigation has an obvious conflict of interest?
While little is known about Judge Peter W. Hall, Susan L. Carney is married to Lincoln Caplan, a member of the New York Times editorial board. Caplan's father, Lewis, and Russian-born grandfather Jacob Caplan were both members and leaders of the Zionist secret society, the B'nai B'rith. Jacob Caplan was president of the Horeb Lodge of New Haven and later president of the larger regional district for the secret society. The B'nai B'rith, founded in New York in 1843, is a secret Jewish order like Freemasonry, which allows only Zionist Jews to be members. While it describes itself as a "service" organization, this description masks the fact that it is a highly secretive Masonic-like organization dedicated to supporting the Zionist agenda and the state of Israel. The New York Times has long been a B'nai B'rith controlled newspaper owned by one of the founding families of Lodge 1 of the B'nai B'rith. The New York Times has also played a key part of the 9-11 cover-up by ignoring the evidence that the Twin Towers were destroyed using explosives and nanothermite. As a son of the secretive B'nai B'rith (probably a member in good standing) and a member of the editorial board of the New York Times, Lincoln Caplan is also part of the 9-11 cover-up.
These two connections go a long way in explaining why the Mariani motion was denied. It was not denied because it lacked merit or failed to prove Judge Hellerstein's conflict of interest. It was denied simply because it was being considered in a court that is anything but impartial when the subject being considered concerns the state of Israel. The chief judge of the court is an active supporter of the Zionist state and one of the judges who considered the motion is married to the state of Israel through her husband and his family's long-standing support for the secret society that is behind the Zionist enterprise.
The 9-11 victims have been robbed of justice and the guilty parties have been protected. It was highly unlikely that the same corrupt court system that put Judge Hellerstein in charge of the 9-11 litigation would accept any evidence showing that he had a conflict of interest in the process. What the denial of the Mariani motion demonstrates most clearly is that justice for the crimes of 9-11 is not to be expected from the corrupt federal courts of New York.
Sources and Recommended Reading:
“9-11 Widow's Motion Exposes Judge's Ties to Israeli Defendant ICTS,” May 2, 2012
http://www.bollyn.com/9-11-widows-motion-exposes-judge-hellersteins-ties-to-israeli-defendant-icts/
“Judge Forces Families to Settle Out of Court,” September 9, 2007
http://www.bollyn.com/judge-forces-families-to-settle-out-of-court/
“Judge Hellerstein's Unethical Connection to Key Defendant in 9-11 Lawsuit,” May 10, 2010
http://www.bollyn.com/judge-hellersteins-unethical-connection-to-key-defendant-in-9-11-lawsuit/
“B'nai B'rith - The Secret Society of Jews,” November 22, 2009
http://www.bollyn.com/the-zionist-criminal-network/#article_11746
“The Jewish Secret Society That Controls the U.S. Media,” December 1, 2009
http://www.bollyn.com/the-jewish-secret-society-that-controls-the-us-media/
Are Israel and their French and British zionist puppets plan attacks during the games and will try to blame an Arab and Muslim delegation?
Pax Talmudica 2012: Londoners you are doomed : Mossad helps UK secure Olympics
Now read this:
Israeli secret service participates in drill that simulates 1972 terrorist attack on Jewish athletes in Munich
Mossad officials participated in a security drill at London's Olympic Park last weekend.
A source at the British Cabinet told Yedioth Ahronoth that the drill simulated a terrorist attack on athletes, similar to the one that occurred in the Munich Olympics in 1972, when Palestinian terrorists took over the building where the Israeli delegation was staying, and killed 11 of them.
The UK's entire defense establishment, including the emergency services, participated in the massive drill, which was held secretly by the British Defense Ministry.
But British intelligence officials were not satisfied, and invited their Mossad counterparts to share their experience.
The drill simulated a scenario where athletes are held hostage by terrorists. A large part of the exercise took place inside the park's residential buildings, under live fire. The village was surrounded by guards who kept out onlookers.
A source at the British Olympic Association said that "certain Israeli elements are advising us on securing the Olympic games." Israel is considered an authority on urban warfare.
The UK has allocated nearly a billion dollars for the security of the athletic event – more than 10% of the event's budget.
Last weekend's drill is the first in a series exercises that are expected to take place in the coming month. The British defense establishment is also preparing to deal with attacks on other Olympic facilities and on the streets of London, which will be flooded with tourists come next July.
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4067585,00.html
This picture was taken in Madison, Georgia, in 2005, in an area used by the american CDC. These are the 200 000 coffins or 'lining caskets' ordered by G4S for the London Olympics 2012.
Now if you want to understand how and why Israel plans a nuclear false flag operation during the London Olympics in 2012, you have to understand how the threats and blackmailing from State to State work. The olympic committee, Locog, warned the Algerian delegation about possible sanctions if Algerian athletes refuse or boycott some events where Israelis athletes are taking part during the London 2012 Olympics game, in support for the Palestinians. In the same time, we've learned that the mossad was in London to 'participates in drills that simulates 1972 terrorist attack on Jewish athletes in Munich'. In subliminal words, Israel is planning something and will blame some Arabs and Muslims delegation and here the threats were directed against the Algerians. Why the Algerians? The regime is 100% under Zionist control?
So the Algerian delegation took it seriously and warned that they will boycott the games and have insisted that the arrangements for the multi-faith worship centre are not satisfactory, since the centre does not face Mecca. If they don’t get what they want, they’re threatening to boycott the games! So Locog decided to square up to controversy and make it about Islam.The French came in and counter-threat to boycott the Olympics themselves if any special considerations are given to the Algerians. Do you get the message?
Since 2005, most of the leaks warning the world about an Israeli nuclear 911 in Europe, to start a world war, (Israel calls this war the 'emancipating war'), came from the infiltration-destruction of the French-Israelis-Algerian terrorist networks. Jonathan Evans, do you agree? You Israeli fool! G4S was linked to the mossad you knew it, how many goyims are allowed to work in high security in the occupied lands? Are all these threats directed to me and my contacts here in the UK and Europe? You and the 'little Hitler' are no match, but come if you have something in the pants! 'Sheykh mate' Israel-Evans!
AS
Islamic Intel Blog
الله اكبر الله اكبر الله اكبر العزة لله ولرسوله وللمؤمنينMossad helps UK secure Olympics
Israeli secret service participates in drill that simulates 1972 terrorist attack on Jewish athletes in Munich
Yaniv Halili
|
A source at the British Cabinet told Yedioth Ahronoth that the drill simulated a terrorist attack on athletes, similar to the one that occurred in the Munich Olympics in 1972, when Palestinian terrorists took over the building where the Israeli delegation was staying, and killed 11 of them.
The UK's entire defense establishment, including the emergency services, participated in the massive drill, which was held secretly by the British Defense Ministry.
But British intelligence officials were not satisfied, and invited their Mossad counterparts to share their experience.
The drill simulated a scenario where athletes are held hostage by terrorists. A large part of the exercise took place inside the park's residential buildings, under live fire. The village was surrounded by guards who kept out onlookers.
The UK has allocated nearly a billion dollars for the security of the athletic event – more than 10% of the event's budget.
Last weekend's drill is the first in a series exercises that are expected to take place in the coming month. The British defense establishment is also preparing to deal with attacks on other Olympic facilities and on the streets of London, which will be flooded with tourists come next July.
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4067585,00.html
London 2012 false flag -- Do They Dare?
KHURASAN: THE INVINCIBLE ARMIES OF ISLAAM FIGHTING THE ISRAELI MOSCHIAH-DAJJAL.
Related by Abu Hurayrah ra: The Prophet Sallallahu 'Alaihi Wa Sallam said: "(Armies carrying) black flags will come from Khurasan (Afghanistan). No power will be able to stop them and they will finally reach Jerusalem where they will erect their flags." (Tirmidhi)
U.S. Has No Idea Who’s a Taliban ‘Leader,’ Still Boasts About Killing Them
Taliban fighters line up to hand in their guns to the Afghan government during a “reintegration” ceremony, May 2012. Photo: Flickr/ISAF
Since January 2011, the U.S.-led coalition in Afghanistan claims it’s killed or captured over 100 insurgent “leaders.” Too bad it doesn’t have any clear idea what “leader” means. Any insurgent who commands another person apparently qualifies. And worse, by that criteria, Taliban and aligned insurgents have killed twice as many U.S. troops in the same time period.
According to Danger Room’s count, since January 2011, ISAF troops have killed or captured at least 104 insurgent leaders. You might expect the insurgency to be battered from the loss of so many senior commanders in such a short period of time.
That’s the impression left from press release after press release. “A Taliban leader,” who happens to be an “explosives expert,” was taken into custody in Kandahar on July 8. Two days before, an airstrike killed “the Lashkar-e-Taiba insurgent leader Ammar” in Kunar Province. The day before that, the NATO command in Afghanistan, known as ISAF, killed “a senior Taliban leader,” Nek Mohammed, in the northern province of Sar-e Pul.
But what ISAF isn’t disclosing is that it doesn’t have any clear criteria for who it considers an insurgent leader. “The ISAF Joint Command does not have a specific definition for insurgent leaders in terms of geographical responsibility or numbers of men under command,” ISAF said in a statement provided to Danger Room. “In general, when we refer to an insurgent or terrorist leader, it is a member of an insurgent or terrorist organization who leads a number of insurgents in conducting attacks, facilitating attacks or coordinating the provision of support to permit the continuance of the insurgent or terrorist activities.”
“It depends a bit on the levels at which you’re taking the leadership down to,” adds U.K. Navy Lt. Cmdr. James Williams, an ISAF spokesman. “Any group of people have a leader, [whether there's] two or more, there’s always one of those people who’s in the lead.”
Danger Room tallied up ISAF’s announced kills and captures from the American Forces Press Service, the Pentagon’s official news service, which takes its information from ISAF. Permutations on “Taliban leader,” “Haqqani network leader” and “insurgent leader” stretching back to January 2011 counted for this sample. This total is surely incomplete, since not every ISAF announcement makes it into the American Forces Press Service.
Williams adds that ISAF would count the insurgent equivalent of a sergeant in charge of a squad of a handful of soldiers as a “leader.”
By that definition, the U.S. suffered twice as many casualties of “leaders” during that period. According to Danger Room’s count, 246 soldiers, Marines, sailors and airmen with the rank of sergeant or higher have been killed in Afghanistan since January 2011. The Taliban could just as easily boast of that figure to convey an adversary in disarray. But since the ISAF military structure remains robust, it would be a misleading claim.
Insurgencies are confusing things, and after 10 years of war, the U.S. still struggles to understand Afghanistan and the insurgency that feeds off it. The Taliban and affiliated groups have no clear order of battle. “If a person was considered a leader” in an ISAF press release, Williams says, “that would be based on a considered assessment, as opposed to [ISAF] trying to glorify a success.”
Some ISAF determinations of who is an insurgent leader are stronger than others. Operations that ISAF announces occur “to detain a Taliban leader” or other specifically named individual, Williams says, occur pursuant to a “warrant issued by the appropriate authorities,” often an Afghan judge. Still, that demonstrates an insurgent’s value to U.S. and allied forces, not necessarily his value to the Afghan insurgency. And without a strict definition of who actually is an insurgent leader, ISAF may be fooling itself as to which insurgents matter the most for bringing the war to a successful conclusion.
The press releases reflect a broader shift in ISAF strategy. Since Gen. David Petraeus took command in the summer of 2010, U.S. troops have heavily boosted commando raids aimed to kill and capture key members of the Taliban and affiliated insurgent groups. The former head of the Joint Special Operations Command, Adm. William McRaven, estimated last year that between June 2010 and June 2011, special operations forces in Afghanistan conducted 1700 nighttime raids against such “top” insurgents.
But that emphasis on neutralizing Taliban leaders hasn’t translated into a neutralized insurgency. “Taliban senior leaders remain capable of providing strategic guidance to the broader insurgency and channeling resources to support operational priorities,” assessed the Defense Department’s most recent official overview of the war. (.PDF) Insurgent attacks from October 2011 to March 2012, the most recent available figures, are down a mere 16 percent from the previous year.
One factor, perhaps in that meager decline, is ISAF’s lack of a “specific definition for insurgent leaders in terms of geographical responsibility or numbers of men under command.”
Research assistance for this post provided by Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/07/taliban-leaders/
US Military analyst: Israel might pull out a false flag attack in London and blame it on Iran.
URGENT UPDATE: Thursday 19 July 2012: Some British and American fear an Israeli false flag operation. All israeli 'security' companies and known israeli agents insiders in the UK, French, German, Dutch governments are under high scrutiny. Why the FBI is pulling between 500 to 1500 officers, plus the US military already in place in the streets of London. Something is really wrong here. Secretary Clinton Assassination Attempt in Israel. Video and links update below:
The Iranian network Press TV published an interview on its website, with the US Military analyst Gordon Duff (see Sec. Clinton Assassination Attempt in Israel here), who says he has highly credible information that Israel might pull out a false flag attack during the London Olympics and blame it on Iran, to push the US into war with the Persian country.
In the same day that Press TV published it, Sky News released a video interviewing an insider at G4S firm, who says the private security of the London Olympics is a joke and there's a 50% chance of deadly weapons get snuck into the Olympic village.
http://www.presstv.com/detail/2012/07/10/250245/iran-can-easily-rout-israeli-...
http://news.sky.com/story/959450/whistleblowers-olympic-security-warning
Israel Likely Behind Bulgaria False Flag
By Stephen Lendman, Contributor
theintelhub.com
July 20, 2012
Israel’s history is odious. State terror is policy. It’s a dagger pointed at humanity’s heart. False flags and targeted assassinations are specialties.
Mossad and Shin Bet (Israel’s Security Agency) have notorious terrorist histories. Bet on either organization’s dirty hands behind the latest Bulgaria attack.
Fingers point the wrong way. Israel blames Iran for its own crimes.
Unindicted war criminal Netanyahu said “Israel will respond forcefully to Iranian terror.” At issue is a Bulgarian Sarafovo airport bomb attack. It’s located in Burgas. It’s a popular Black Sea resort destination. Israeli tourists and others were killed.
On July 19, Reuters headlined “Bulgaria says suicide bomber blew up airport bus,” saying:
A bus carrying Israeli tourists and others was attacked. Eight deaths were reported. Around 30 others were injured. According to Interior Minister Tsvetan Tsvetanov:
“We have established a person who was a suicide bomber in this attack. This person had a fake driving license from the United States.”
It wasn’t coincidental that the attack came on the anniversary of the 1994 AMIA (Argentine Israelite Mutual Association) Buenos Aires bombing. It killed 85 and injured hundreds. Argentina has Latin America’s largest Jewish population. It numbers around 200,000. Israel falsely blamed Iran.
Its officials jumped on the latest attack. Defense Minister Ehud Barak pointed fingers the wrong way, saying:
“The immediate executors are Hezbollah people, who of course have constant Iranian sponsorship.”
A White House statement stopped short of blaming Iran and/or Hezbollah, saying:
Obama “strongly condemns today’s barbaric terrorist attack on Israelis in Bulgaria….As Israel has tragically once more been a target of terrorism, the United States reaffirms our unshakeable commitment to Israel’s security, and our deep friendship and solidarity with the Israeli people.”
Hillary Clinton issued a similar statement.
America, Israel, and key NATO partners are responsible for more global terrorism and deaths than the rest of the world combined and then some.
Mossad specializes in targeted and larger scale killings. Car bombs are a favorite tactic. Assassinating former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri was classic Israeli state terror.
Compelling February 2005 visual and audio evidence revealed real time intercepted Israeli aerial surveillance footage of routes he used on the day he was killed.
Israel was clearly involved. Syria initially was blamed. Hezbollah was later falsely named and indicted. It was typical Mossad targeting. No one at the time knew for sure. A powerful car bomb caused a 30 foot crater. Over 20 were killed and over 100 injured.
No evidence whatever proved Hezbollah’s involvement. It had nothing to gain but plenty to lose. Israel and Washington greatly benefitted.
Mossad’s dirty hands were responsible like for many dozens of other incidents. Israel and America perfected the art of killing. They’re also expert at pointing fingers the wrong way. Victims often are blamed.
On July 19, Haaretz headlined “Israel has no doubt about who is behind the deadly attack in Bulgaria.”
Neither do independent observers familiar with its odious terrorist history. Netanyahu spuriously blamed Iran. Iranian Revolutionary Guards Quds Force General Qassem Suleimani was named. No corroborating evidence whatever was cited because there is none.
Netanyahu falsely claims Iran spreads terror worldwide. He also blames Hezbollah.
The New York Times outrageously said if Israel’s accusation is true, “the Bulgarian blast would be the first successful attempt by Iranian operatives to kill Israelis in attacks abroad after a string of failed bomb plots targeting Israeli diplomats in Georgia, India and Thailand this year.”
Iran, of course, had nothing to do with any of them. Blaming Tehran didn’t pass the smell test. Last October, Iranians were falsely accused of trying to kill Saudi Arabia’s ambassador in Washington. The charge resembled a bad film plot. It was baseless, and officials pointing fingers the wrong way knew it.
Last February, Israel again levied false charges. India and Georgia incidents were cited. Allegedly Israeli embassy workers in both countries were targeted. One injury was reported. No one was killed.
A Bangkok, Thailand incident happened around the same time. Iranians were detained after an explosion damaged their rented house. Despite no credible evidence, they were suspected of targeting Israeli diplomats.
Iran threatens no one. It painstakingly avoids provocations. It has everything to lose and nothing to gain from them. Israel benefits greatly. The above incidents and many others bore classic Mossad fingerprints. So does Bulgaria.
Israel and Washington wage covert and low-level hot war on Iran.
Tactics include computer viruses, other cyber attacks, bombings, sabotage, multiple rounds of sanctions, attempts to cripple its central bank and oil exports, targeted assassinations, satellite, drone, and other type spying, bogus accusations, a partial isolating blockade, and saber rattling stopping short of bombs away.
Both countries menace humanity. Iran threatens no one. Its neighbors know it. It hasn’t attacked another country in over 200 years. No evidence suggests it’s developing nuclear weapons.
Washington and Israel specialize in false flags, war, other belligerence, targeted killings, and state terror as official policy.
They’re advancing the ball for war on Syria. They’re itching for pretexts to attack Iran. One observer called Tehran a war looking for an excuse. They’re easily instigated or invented.
Days before the Bulgaria incident, a Lebanese man was detained in Cyprus. Based on Israeli intelligence allegations, police connected him to Hezbollah.
Cypriot authorities claimed “possible charges pertaining to terrorism laws.” He was accused of having photographs of “Israeli targets,” El Al Airlines flight schedules, and tour bus information.
He was a tourist. Visitors take photos. They also have airline schedules and use buses for sightseeing. Relating this information to alleged terrorism doesn’t wash.
Police claimed they found “documents” linking him to a “terror cell” planning attacks on Israeli targets. Blowing up a plane or bus was charged.
Unexplained was precisely what was found and why someone plotting these things would allegedly carry around indictable evidence.
No weapons or explosives were found. Charges don’t hold water. Without clear corroborating evidence, there’s no plot, no crime, or intention to commit one.
Bulgaria’s bus attack was criminal. No evidence links Iran and/or Hezbollah. It bears classic Mossad fingerprints. Perhaps CIA operatives were also involved.
Both organizations are linked to assassinating Iranian scientists. They stay unaccountable while Iran and Hezbollah face repeated false charges.
Expect one or more future false flags to be pretext for war. Syria tops Washington’s queue, then Iran. It’s just a matter of time until full-scale intervention targets both countries.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. His new book is titled How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War
Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/
Israel probable author of Bulgaria false flag operation
A truck carries the bus damaged by a bomb blast which targeted a group of Israeli tourists at the airport in Bourgas, Bulgaria, on July 19, 2012.
By Kevin Barrett
Another notorious example of pre-reporting is the BBC's report, broadcast at about 5 p.m. on 9/11/2001, that World Trade Center Building 7 had collapsed due to fire. In fact, WTC-7 did not “collapse” until 5:23 p.m. - about twenty minutes after the BBC report. Apparently those responsible for the 9/11 false-flag attack wanted to plant the idea that WTC-7 collapsed from fire in the mind of the public at the earliest possible opportunity.
Even before the dust had settled and the victims were laid to rest, the Israelis and their global media assets were blaming Iran for the attack in Burgas, Bulgaria.
The Washington Post, America's second most influential Zionist newspaper, reported on Thursday: “Israeli and American officials have blamed the Iran-backed Lebanese militant group Hezbollah for the bombing.” Yet the Post article acknowledged that Bulgarian officials had not even identified the bomber!
This “rush to judgment” suggests that Israel, not Iran, is the probable author of the attack.
History shows that whenever authorities blame a convenient scapegoat before the evidence is in, the attack in question is almost certainly a false-flag event.
On August 4th, 1964, American President Lyndon B. Johnson appeared on national television and blamed North Vietnam for an alleged attack on the USS Maddox in the Gulf of Tonkin. Hysterical newspaper headlines damned the dastardly communist attack. The Gulf of Tonkin incident mobilized American public opinion for a vastly expanded - and ultimately unsuccessful - US war on Vietnam. Yet the incident never happened! Historians today agree that there was no North Vietnamese attack on the Maddox. Instead, a fake attack was staged by the American authorities themselves. Had the media treated Johnson's claims with skepticism, and taken the time to investigate what really happened in the Gulf of Tonkin, they might have saved as many as four million lives, including the lives of 58,156 American soldiers.
False-flag terror operations seek to cast blame on the designated scapegoat as quickly as possible. Why? Because most people are heavily influenced by first impressions. If the first report we hear tells us that the North Vietnamese attacked a US ship, that JFK was shot by a Communist named Oswald, that Osama Bin Laden and 19 young Arabs orchestrated the events of 9/11, or that Iran was behind the Bulgarian bus bombing, people are likely to continue to believe that initial report, even if subsequent evidence conclusively disproves it.
Another reason for the “rush to judgment” in false-flag cases is that public outrage diminishes quickly after such events. In order to harness the “wave of useful indignation” that such events are designed to provoke, and link it to the designated scapegoat, a quick media blitz blaming the scapegoat is necessary.
Sometimes the perpetrators of false-flag attacks are in such a hurry to blame the scapegoat that they trip themselves up and fall flat on their faces. American national television reported on the morning of November 22nd, 1963, hours before the JFK assassination, that President Kennedy was likely to be assassinated in Dallas by a “lone nut.” (Archival footage of the report may be viewed in the documentary Evidence of Revision.) Then a Communist “lone nut” named Lee Harvey Oswald was blamed for the assassination - despite the fact that no evidence whatsoever linked him to the shooting of JFK - almost from the moment he was arrested in a theater for yet another shooting that no available evidence tied him to! A report in the New Zealand edition of the US military paper Stars and Stripes blamed Oswald, and offered a detailed biography, before Oswald had even been charged, according to Col. Fletcher Prouty. The snafu was likely caused by a conspirator forgetting about the international date line.
Another notorious example of pre-reporting is the BBC's report, broadcast at about 5 p.m. on 9/11/2001, that World Trade Center Building 7 had collapsed due to fire. In fact, WTC-7 did not “collapse” until 5:23 p.m. - about twenty minutes after the BBC report. Apparently those responsible for the 9/11 false-flag attack wanted to plant the idea that WTC-7 collapsed from fire in the mind of the public at the earliest possible opportunity.
And now, history seems to be repeating itself. The Israelis and the Zionist-owned media have been blaming Iran for the Bulgarian bus bombing almost from the moment the bomb exploded. Since Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu is hysterically seeking a pretext for war on Iran, it stands to reason that Netanyahu himself is the probable author of the attack.
If so, it would be yet another example of Israel's leadership in the field of false-flag terror. From the murderers who dressed as Arabs to bomb the King David Hotel, to the Lavon Affair Israeli terrorists bombing US targets in Egypt and blaming Egyptians, to the botched attack on the USS Liberty that was supposed to be blamed on Egypt, to the Mossad-orchestrated Achille Lauro and Entebbe hijacking incidents, to the "terrorist" bombings of its own embassies in London and Buenos Aires, to 9/11, 7/7, Madrid, Bali, and Mumbai, the Israeli Mossad is behind almost every big "terrorist" outrage blamed on Arabs or Muslims. And the more evil and outrageous the act - the more it inexcusably targets innocent civilian victims - the more certain you can be that it was the Zionists themselves who did it.
As a Middle East Studies expert, I can tell you that Netanyahu's premature attempt to blame Iran for the Bulgarian bus bombing is almost as ridiculous as earlier attempts to blame Iran for an alleged murder plot against the Saudi Ambassador to the US. As any legitimate Middle East expert will tell you, Iranian intelligence is very professional. Yes, they may some day find a way to take revenge against Israel for the ongoing wave of murders and terrorism against Iranian civilians and scientists - as would any other intelligence agency in their place - but hokey plots like the Saudi Ambassador fiasco, or going after a busload of Israeli tourists, just isn't their style. And the last thing Iran wants right now is to give Israel and its American vassal the excuse to launch a war.
Will global public opinion be suckered once again by the same old false-flag gambit? Or has the alternative media succeeded in educating the public about false-flag terror to the point that it no longer works?
The coming weeks and months will answer those questions.
Muslim Genocide Burma Ethnic Cleansing
Suu Ky's silence on oppression of Muslims shocking
 |
| Rohingya people trying to cross the Naf river into Bangladesh to escape the genocide |
The West, led by the US, is pouring huge sums of money into Myanmar (Burma) and blathering about the supposed "democratization" of that long-time human rights pariah nation. Meanwhile, the Rohingyas - a Muslim ethnic group called "the most persecuted group in the world" by the UN - are facing slow-motion extermination. Though they've lived there for centuries, Burma's government refuses to grant them citizenship, and is trying to get rid of them. Mass murder, pogroms, the burning of homes and mosques - the usual tools of attempted genocide - are being deployed against them. And still the US lavishes money and praise on the regime...while Nobel prize-winning human rights icon Ang San Suu Kyi ignores the genocide in her own country. I was a guest on yesterday's Press TV program on the slow-motion genocide of the Rohingyas:
Suu Ky's silence on oppression of Muslims shocking: Analyst
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/07/14/250944/suu-kyi-antimuslims-stance-shocking/
Myanmar's democracy icon Ang San Suu Kyi and Nobel Peace prize winner has not spoken out against atrocities and ethnic cleansing proposal against the Rohingya people. The silence from Ang San Suu Kyi is deafening as Myanmar’s President Thein Sein, a former junta general said on Thursday that the "only solution" was to send nearly a million Rohingya Muslims - one of the world's most persecuted minorities -- to refugee camps run by United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). "We will send them away if any third country would accept them," he added. "This is what we are thinking is the solution to the issue." The UN refugee agency has snubbed the idea of setting up refugee camps to accommodate the Rohingyas. The UN says decades of discrimination have left the Rohingyas stateless, with Myanmar implementing restrictions on their movements and withholding land rights, education and public services. For the past two years, waves of ethnic Muslims have attempted to flee the country in the face of systematic oppression by the Myanmar government. The government of Myanmar refuses to recognize them claiming the Rohingyas are not native and has classified them as illegal migrants, although they have lived in Myanmar for centuries.
Suu Ky's silence on oppression of Muslims shocking: Analyst
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/07/14/250944/suu-kyi-antimuslims-stance-shocking/
Myanmar's democracy icon Ang San Suu Kyi and Nobel Peace prize winner has not spoken out against atrocities and ethnic cleansing proposal against the Rohingya people. The silence from Ang San Suu Kyi is deafening as Myanmar’s President Thein Sein, a former junta general said on Thursday that the "only solution" was to send nearly a million Rohingya Muslims - one of the world's most persecuted minorities -- to refugee camps run by United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). "We will send them away if any third country would accept them," he added. "This is what we are thinking is the solution to the issue." The UN refugee agency has snubbed the idea of setting up refugee camps to accommodate the Rohingyas. The UN says decades of discrimination have left the Rohingyas stateless, with Myanmar implementing restrictions on their movements and withholding land rights, education and public services. For the past two years, waves of ethnic Muslims have attempted to flee the country in the face of systematic oppression by the Myanmar government. The government of Myanmar refuses to recognize them claiming the Rohingyas are not native and has classified them as illegal migrants, although they have lived in Myanmar for centuries.
Full story and video:
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/07/14/250944/suu-kyi-antimuslims-stance-shocking/
http://truthjihad.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/suu-kys-silence-on-oppression-of.html
Fall of Al Sauds : Bandar or the israeli plan to dismantle all the Hijaz and attack Iran, through Lebanon-Syria, Bahrein, Yemen, Iraq 'sunni-shia' civil wars and 'fake revolutions'
Israel plans to occupy all the Hijaz, after Bandar coup d'etat in Saudi Arabia.
Prince Bandar’s Wake-Up Call
By Peter Chamberlin
Prince Bander. It feels like something sinister has just occurred, but it may be a long time until we figure-out just what that was (SEE: Saudi Appointment Suggests Bigger Regional Ambitions ). When dealing with the Saudis, nothing is as it seems. Trying to understand the Saudi royal family is something like trying to decipher a hidden code–What does the advancing of Bandar Bush to the top job in Saudi intelligence services really imply?
Whenever there are major changes in the Saudi royal family, our first impressions often prove to be wrong, since we can only see surface appearances. Much like looking at an iceberg, most of the facts about the Wahhabi kingdom are hidden beneath the surface. Bandar is the biggest “berg” of the bunch. The move of Bandar to the top of the Saudi’s “cia” is far more significant than just the replacement of the previous spy boss (who had proven himself to be inadequate for the Saudi’s needs), simply because of the baggage that Bandar carries with him. He has served as Saudi Arabia’s primary connection to every American Administration since Reagan, because of his strong connections with the leaders of the Republican Party (this is how he earned the title “Bandar Bush”).
Bandar Bush has been the irreplaceable key to nearly all of the Grand Ole Party’s secret foreign policy adventures. Even Democrats like Clinton and Obama, who choose to act like Republicans, have been able to motivate the Republican associates of Bandar, in order to obtain his help in pulling together another of his “Islamist” armies for “humanitarian interventions” in Muslim countries. Brother Bandar was extremely active during the Bush years, advising both Cheney and Bush, while organizing their secret deals to put his militant network to work. During the Bush era, elements of his militant network came to be called “al-Qaeda” (the base), as their terrorist exploits were amplified in the Western press, to create the impression of a massive army of international “Islamists” waging war against the civilized world. The legendary “exploits” of al-Qaeda are actually the acts of many separate, unconnected terror outfits, writ larger than life on the Western TV screens, as if all the terrorists worked for one Saudi boss.
The Bush Administration successfully insulated the Saudis from any blame for supporting and using this terrorist network, enabling Bandar’s boys to provide the unified enemy nexus that Bush and Cheney so desperately needed to justify their wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and half a dozen other hot spots. This formula for creating new wars was intended to empower the American war for Empire, as the flagship of predatory capitalism ripped through a series of Middle Eastern and North African countries (as revealed early on by General Wesley K. Clark). War on Iran was scheduled to follow a quick victory in Iraq, which anticlimactically, ended rather quickly, contrary to expectations, proving to be another embarrassment to the Administration.
The Neocon scheme began to unravel very quickly in Bush’s second term, as he became a victim of his previous easy successes in starting new wars. The American war machine too easily devoured the token resistance of the Taliban and Saddam’s forces after that. Easy victories upset the formula, as old battles could not “logically” (if perpetual war was your goal) be finished until sufficient groundwork had been done, laying the charges and lighting the fuses for new American wars. Iran would have to wait for Bandar’s boys, or other assets (Mossad) to cause a strong enoughIranian reaction to their probing attacks to provide an excuse for a massive America counter-reaction. Meanwhile, similar excuses needed to be engineered to justify the extended stays in Afghanistan and Iraq (leading directly to the creation of the Pakistani Taliban and “al-Qaeda in Iraq”). While they were at it, the Saudis produced terrorist prodigy Ibn al-Khattab, who hailed from the same Saudi/Jordanian border town as the legendary boss of “al-Qaeda in Iraq,” Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.
Bandar’s Sunni “Islamist” network managed to produce two semi-effective anti-Iranian Sunni outfits, Jundullah and Mujahedeen e-Khalq (MEK), both proved to be unsuited to the task of rallying terrorist armies to their sides in Shia Iran. Bandar also came up short in his search for satisfactory terrorist clients to oppose Iranian inroads in any of the targeted Muslim countries with mixed populations of both Shia and Sunni, like Lebanon, Syria, or the Palestinian territories. Bandar seemed to fall out of favor with Bush after the failure of Israel’s war against Hezbollah stalled in Lebanon in 2006. Anticipated local insurgencies in Lebanon and Syria failed to materialize, leaving Israel standing alone against Hezbollah with their Zionist pants around their ankles. When the IDF did not live-up to their exalted military prowess, failing to-led make quick work of the Lebanese Shia resistance (like the US-supported Northern Alliance forces had easily walked over the Taliban), it seemed to take the wind out of Bush’s sails. The previous urgency is instigating war with Iran seemed to quickly fade, as war fever started to cool and Bush appeared to lose his taste for starting new aggressive wars.
Around that same time, a feud between Bandar and Prince Turki broke out into the open, ending with Turki’s resignation as US ambassador. It has been reported that the feud was over Saudi policy regarding America’s Iranian policy (SEE: Prince Bandar’s Ambitions: Turki-Bandar Feud Over US Politics Cause of Resignation). Turki favored a more even-handed diplomatic approach, embodied in the Arab Peace Initiative for Palestinian statehood at the UN and supporting the moderates in Iraq, while Bandar wanted to butt heads with the Iranians, in order to solve the Sunni/Shia problem once and for all (SEE: Prince Bandar Allegedly Advocating Military Response Against Iran). In short, Bandar represented the militant Cheney wing of the Republicans, while Prince Turki was the Saudi advocate for the moderate Baker/Scowcroft wing. Bush had grown tired of being let down by the “Cheneys” and “Bandars” lined-up at the American seat of power.
Much like his pal Cheney, Bandar seemed to skulk back into the shadows after that, as efforts to drive the terror war covertly seemed to crash head-on into operations intended to prolong the individual wars, producing obvious contradictions, which began to arouse the suspicions of the American people. Bush turned the wars over to the Pentagon advisers, turning his deaf to the spies. Bandar disappeared completely from the public eye in 2008, after the failed Georgian attempt to expel Russia and Republican McCain’s defeat, giving rise to multiple rumors, the most extreme of which was the theory that Bandar had attempted a coup against King Abdullah by Bandar and about 200 loyalists (SEE: In kingdom, Saudi prince’s coup ‘fails’). Whatever the truth was, Bandar remained hidden until 2010, when he emerged from obscurity amid great fanfare.
Perhaps Bandar had emerged then to reclaim lost ground. In his absence, King Abdullah had given cautious support to the diplomatic measures that Prince Turki had been pushing. Abdullah had even given Turki’s ideas on rapprochement with the dark sheep of the Arab fold, Syrian Bashar Hafez al-Assad, meeting him in Damascus on Oct 7, 2009. Bandar’s father, Crown Prince Sultan bin Abdel Aziz had undergone surgery in New York in February 2009 for an undisclosed illness, forcing the Saudi second-in-command to spend the year afterwards, recuperating in the United States and at a palace in Morocco.
The heir to the Saudi throne, Crown Prince Sultan died on October 21, 2011, whereupon Prince Naif bin Abdulaziz Al Saud became the next Crown Prince, or heir apparent. Less than one month later, on Nov 11, 2011, Prince Turki’s diplomatic plans for Palestinian Statehood at the United Nations were effectively scuttled, as the security council put off the vote on admitting Palestine as a state. On June 16 , 2012, Crown Prince Naif (Nayef) also died. Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud became the next Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia.
The man whom Bandar had sidelined as Prince Naif’s chief of Saudi Intelligence was Prince Muqrin bin Abdulaziz. The Institute For Gulf Affairs recently revealed correspondence between Naif and his intelligence chief Muqrin, concerning the Saudi handling of the Shia protests:
“The letters discuss how a situation involving Shia instigation in the Eastern Province should be handled. In the exchange Muqrin argued for a much stronger and harsher approach, but was vetoed by Naif.”
On Sunday, July 8, Muqrin’s “stronger and harsher approach” was given a go, as Shia cleric Ayatollah Al-Nemer was shot during his brutal arrest, setting-off massive Shia rioting in the Eastern Province, home of most Saudi oil fields. Muqrin was supposed to be the kingdom’s top expert on the eastern provinces, since his son-in-law, Mohammed bin Fahd, was the governor of that province, but his insight into the Shia mind was as incomplete as any other Sunni. Creating martyrs for the Shiite cause is not the path to peace in Saudi Arabia, or in any other Muslim nation. In addition to this royal disappointment, Muqrin had also recently dealt a severe psychological blow to the kingdom’s most important ally, Pakistan, by his cooperation with India and the United States in the capture of wanted Lashkar e-Taiba militant, 26/11 co-conspirator Sayed Zabiuddin, alias Abu Jindal. These two major embarrassments to the King are the primary reason for the outing of the long-time Saudi security chief.
Does the positioning of Bandar in Muqrin’s job herald a change for the worse in Saudi Arabia’s treatment of its Shia citizens, or does it signify that the Keeper of the Two Holy Mosques intends to take the effort to force submission of the eastern Shiites to Tehran?
2 comments:
As salam aleykoum wa rahmatullah
Qu'en penses tu akhi Souleyman ?
Aucune confirmation pour le moment mais la guerre pour le pouvoir bat son plein et nous savons tous ce qui se passera. Le type est tres dangeureux pour les Musulmans, et il preparait un coup d'etat. Ce serait surprenant qu'ils le tuent aussi facilement.
Wa Allah swt 'alam
After Bandar organisation of his coup d'etat in Saudi Arabia. One of the Muslim armies will erect victorious in the 'big war' against NATO-US-UK-France-Germany-Israel. Then Israel will be defeated by the Muslim armies headed by a Muslim General, imam Mahdi, and Jesus the Son of Mary, 'Issa Ibn Maryam, peace and blessings of Allah be upon them
An inspiring and beneficial reminder of the Ahadiths of our Noble Prophet Muhammad, Peace and Blessings of Allah be upon him, regarding two of the signs of the Hour: al-Malhama and Qitalul Yahood; The two great battles between the armies of Allah, the Exalted, and the armies of the cursed Shaytan
The beloved Imam Anwar Al-Awlaki (Shaheed inshaAllah) and may Allah accept him and increase his ranks in al-Firdaus, reminds the Ummah with evidence from the Qur'an and the Sunnah of these important events and signs of the Hour that we are already witnessing during these trying and blessed times of the Ummah of Muhammad sallAllaahu 'alayhi wasallam)
After IOC decided to not commemorate 'Munich' mossad operation in 1972. Israel threatens to blow up London and blame it on Iran and other Muslim countries like Syria, Egypt, Pakistan, Algeria, Yemen, and many others
More Olympic Insanity – Terror Threat for NOT Commemorating Munich?
by Zen Gardner,
This is beyond comprehension now. They’re making anything up they can to get the war pitch intensified, even if it makes no sense. Well, actually it makes sense, as it’s a veiled threat from the Zionists:
London on alert for terror attack ahead of Olympic Games
London is on alert ahead of the Olympics after reports of a planned terror attack following IOC president Jacques Rogge’s decision not to hold commemorative ceremonies for victims of the 1972 Munich Games massacre. Source: Getty Images
ISRAEL fears an Iranian terror squad in Europe are planning to attack their athletes during the London Olympics, according to reports.
Agents from Israel’s elite intelligence organisation, Mossad, are hunting Iranian-backed terrorists in Europe, who are allegedly planning an “anniversary” attack 40 years after the Munich massacre, Britain’s The Sunday Times reports.
The fears come as tensions rise over the International Olympic Committee refusal to commemorate the killing of 11 Israeli athletes and coaches by Palestinian terrorists on September 5, 1972.
In preparation for an Olympic terror assault, panic rooms for VIPs and spectators have been set up beneath London’s Olympic Stadium to protect them from being taken hostage or killed, according to The Sunday Times.
The paper also claims that if an attack occurred on the stadium, security forces would “invacuate” key people, rushing them to safety inside the attack zone.
An estimated 50,000 VIPs will attend the Games, including a reported 140 heads of state, 200 government ministers, 100 royals and 150 members of the International Olympic Committee.
A ring of steel has been set up to protect the Games, including snipers on the stadium roof and lighting towers and airborne radiation detecting equipment.
While M15 and Scotland Yard have reportedly raised the threat level against Israelis at the Games, Israel’s security squad Shin Bet has also been sent to protect the country’s 38 athletes living at the Athletes Village.
Concerns of an attack on Israel were heightened by the suicide bombing of a bus in Bulgaria last week, killing five Israeli tourists and the Bulgarian bus driver. source
What a load.
Found this bs after my last post, couldn’t believe my eyes. So the Moooslims are now upset the Munich game massacre WON’T be commemorated? Are you kidding me? What kind of idiots do you take us for?
Hysteria will now blind the group mind. Into the ozone we go as they play the chaos card.
Be safe and secure, the whole system is basically lying bastards.
Fear not. Truth can’t be broken.
Stay free.
Love, Zen
www.zengardner.com
Recent Massacres: Desensitizing Psy-ops for Olympics False Flag?
Colorado shooting suspect worked at a Jewish summer camp, says L.A. report
James Holmes, the suspect in the Colorado movie theater shooting that left 12 dead and dozens wounded, worked for a Jewish summer camp, the Los Angeles Times reported.
According to the report, Holmes worked in the summer of 2008 as a cabin counselor at Camp Max Strauss. The Los Angeles summer camp was founded in 1938, says the report, is a "nonsectarian program for underprivileged children ages 7-14, run by Jewish Big Brothers Big Sisters of Los Angeles."
At the camp, Holmes was responsible for “the care and guidance of a group of approximately 10 children," Randy Schwab, CEO of Jewish Big Brothers Big Sisters of Los Angeles, wrote in a statement published by the Times. He added that Holmes' role was to help children "learn confidence, self-esteem and how to work in small teams" to affect "positive outcomes."
The Times added that, according to Schwab, Holmes "had no incidents or disciplinary concerns" as a counselor.
“Our hearts and prayers go out to all the families and friends of those involved in this horrible tragedy,” wrote Schwab. “On behalf of Camp Max Straus I want to offer our deepest sympathies and condolences.”
Holmes is suspected in a mass shooting that occurred late Thursday night during a midnight screening of the new Batman film, "The Dark Knight Rises," when he allegedly hurled a gas canister into the auditorium and opened fire on moviegoers. The 24-year-old student was arrested early Friday outside the Aurora theater following the incident.
Twelve people were killed in the attack and dozens wounded. Seven of the wounded remained in critical condition with some injuries that could be permanent.
Law enforcement officials on Saturday began trying to disarm up to 30 devices in Holmes' booby-trapped apartment in Denver. Hoping to find clues to Holmes' motive without destroying key evidence in a blast, federal authorities set off a small explosion to detonate one device.
It was later reported that authorities had removed all of the explosives from the apartment. A law enforcement official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said that power had also been restored to the building.
Federal officials said they have not yet determined a motive for the suspect.
http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-news/colorado-shooting-suspect-worked-at-a-jewish-summer-camp-says-l-a-report-1.452713
Operation Merah : Est un scandale d'etat impliquant la DCRI, la DGSE, le ministere de la justice et des affaires etrangeres dont le but etait de faire re-elire Sarkozy et declencher une guerre totale en France contre les Musulmans au nom de la 'defense d'Israel'
Les 72 anomalies de l’affaire Mohamed Merah
Israel – Temple Mount War Moves Begin as Iran Back Up
Ground Zero - the Temple Mount – Israel’s Next War
…by Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich
“This year, as Israel observes the traditional period of national mourning for the destruction of the Holy Temple on Tisha b’Av (which starts at sundown on Saturday), it has again been revealed that the Islamic Wakf is carrying out unsupervised work at the Temple Mount, potentially causing irrevocable damage to Judaism’s holiest site”.
A December 2011 al-Akhbar article fully elaborates on the Israeli attacks against the Islamic Waqf (see linkii) for the purpose of land grab which includes homes, shops, and even Moslem cemeteries.
But there is another dimension to these attacks – a messianic aspect which is far more alarming than just stealing land from their rightful owners. The inherent danger from the Israeli obsession over the Temple Mount was first elaborated in an article dated June 2010 called “Nukes And Temples” – highlights of which is as follows.
In 2006, the Israeli government began work on an exact replica of the Hurva synagogue on its original site. The story of the Hurva has received little attention other than coinciding with Joe Biden’s visit to Israel and that government’s insistence on building more illegal settlements.
But Hurva is the beginning of the end.
Attempts to fulfill the prophecy are not new. In 1990, there was another attempt by the ‘Temple Mount Faithful’ to bring a cornerstone for a reconstructed Third Temple to the site.
In 2000, Ariel Sharon staged a provocative visit to the Temple Mount and said:
“The Temple Mount is in our hands and will remain in our hands. It is the holiest site in Judaism and it is the right of every Jew to visit the Temple Mount,”.
It took four years to complete the work on Hurva. When presidential candidate, Barack Obama promised AIPAC an undivided Jerusalem in 2008, the building of the Hurva synagogue was well on the way — which signaled continued future attacks on the al-Aqsa Mosque to make way for construction of the Third Temple.
Past wars and future were waged against other countries based on unfounded accusations has distracted the international community from the reality of this construction and its implications – the messianic era.
As importantly, Israel’s stockpile of nuclear weapons – a nation more likely than any other to use their nuclear weapons based on their deep religious ideology.
Of particular concern is the Gush Emunim, a right-wing religious organization, or others, hijacking a nuclear device to ‘liberate’ the Temple Mount for the building of the Third Temple.
The completion of the Hurva synagogue has increased these chances.
On April 6, JTA reported that , “Our Land of Israel” party had put posters on 200 city buses in Jerusalem showing an artist’s rendition of the Third Temple on the site now occupied by the al-Aqsa Mosque with the slogan, “May the Temple be built in our lifetime.”
Equally disturbing, a 1997 article reviewing the Israeli Defense Force repeatedly stressed the possibilities of, and the need to guard against, a religious, right-wing military coup, especially as the proportion of religious in the military increases. iv.
Editing: Jim W. Dean
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/07/26/israel-temple-mount-war-moves-begin-as-iran-back-up/
Murder Of UK Muslims Goes Unpunished
Birmingham Crown Court has acquitted eight men who were allegedly involved in the killing of three British Muslims during the country’s unprecedented unrest last year.
Press TV – Haroon Jahan and brothers Shazad Ali and Abdul Musavir were killed during last year’s unrest after they were hit by a car in Winson Green, Birmingham, Britain’s second largest city.
Pax Talmudica 2012 : Netanyahu's moschiah is coming in his flying saucer made in USA, we told ya!
UFO Over Olympics Opening Ceremony: A Classic Flying Saucer
Islam ignites in Muslim majority Ethiopia
By Thomas C. Mountain,
Today tens of thousands of Ethiopia’s Islamic community are heeding their leaders’ calls and demonstrating in the streets of cities across Ethiopia, most significantly in the capital Addis Ababa, calling for an end to the USA’s policeman on the beat in East Africa, Meles Zenawi.
While Ethiopia is historically portrayed as a Christian country, in reality most Ethiopians are of the Islamic faith. Starting with the Oromo people, who make up at least half or more of the Ethiopian population, 40 million or more, and are almost entirely Muslim. Then add the Afars and Somali people of the Ogaden and it becomes indisputable that Ethiopia is a majority Muslim country.
So when for the first time in modern Ethiopian history the leadership of the Islamic community call for the overthrow of the government, and are joined in this call by the leadership of the Ethiopian Christian Orthodox Church it means only one thing, that the end of the hated USA-backed Meles Zenawi regime is finally in sight.
With insurgencies growing in size and strength throughout Ethiopia, in the east, south, west and north, soaring inflation and economic hardships and now the unprecedented politicization of the leadership of the Muslim community, the consensus of those in the know in the Horn of Africa is that the foreign funded rule of Meles Zenawi may last a year, a year and half at best, possibly even less.
And once Meles is driven from power, and his military either destroyed or having joined the uprising, who will the USA have left to enforce Pax Americana in the strategically critical Horn of Africa?
Thomas C. Mountain is the most widely distributed independent journalist in Africa, living and reporting from Eritrea since 2006. His interviews can be seen on RT and PressTV. He can be reached at thomascmountain at yahoo dot com.
Straussians and Neoconservatives: The Intimate Relationship
For some time there has been a spirited debate on the connection between neoconservatism and political scientist Leo Strauss (1899-1973) and his disciples. Leading neoconservatives have studied under Straussians: Paul Wolfowitz, Deputy Secretary of Defense in George W. Bush’s first administration and “architect of the Iraq War”; Abram Shulsky, the Director of the Pentagon’s Office of Special Plans, which was notorious for its war propaganda on Iraq; Bill Kristol, editor of The Weekly Standard, the major neocon weekly; Laurie Mylroie, chief propagandist of the idea that Saddam Hussein was masterminding terrorism against the US; Gary Schmitt, former executive director of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC); and John Podhoretz, the son of neocon godfather Norman Podhoretz and current editor of Commentary, the noted neoconservative monthly.
Some commentators have gone so far as to claim that significant tenets of neoconservative thinking were actually derived from Straussian teachings, sometimes referring to the neocons as “Strausscons” or “Leocons”; but others, often Straussian academics themselves, deny the two movements are related. Noted paleoconservative scholar, Paul Gottfried, in his new book (“Leo Strauss and the Conservative Movement in America,” Cambridge University Press, 2012) provides a detailed account of the relationship between the two groups and gives considerable attention to the taboo subjects of Jewish ethnic identity and loyalty to Israel.
Gottfried shows that there is a distinct overlap between the two groups in terms of ethnicity, political views, and social and professional relationships. While all neocons are not Straussians, nor all Straussians neocons, Gottfried notes that “the nexus between neoconservatives and Straussians is so tight that it may be impossible to dissociate the two groups in any significant way.” (Gottfried, “Strauss,” pp. 8-9) He maintains that there is a “continuing symbiotic relation” between the two groups. “Neo-conservatives draw their rhetoric and heroic models from Straussian discourse. They also have never hidden their debt to Strauss and the Straussians, even when neoconservative journalists have garbled or vulgarized the message. The Straussians have benefited from the neoconservative ascendancy by gaining access to neoconservative-controlled government resources and foundation money and by obtaining positions as government advisors. It is also hard to think of any critical political issue that has divided the two groups.” (Gottfried, “Strauss,” p. 9)
While the German-born Strauss, who came to the United States in 1937, focused on scholarly endeavors, he did aspire to have an impact in the political realm, and the attention devoted to politics has grown exponentially among his followers. Gottfried contends that “the vital center of the Straussian movement has shifted toward direct political involvement and that those who count in that movement are increasingly political players." (Gottfried, “Strauss,” p. 171) In moving into the political arena, they have joined the neoconservatives.
It might be helpful to touch on a few other aspects of the Straussian approach that loom large in other commentators’ views of the movement. For example, Strauss and his acolytes are strong foes of modern positivism, relativism, and historicism, and claim to adhere to the idea of the objectivity of values, as taught by Plato, Aristotle, Cicero and other luminaries of classical civilization. Some critics interpret the Straussian view as indicating support for anti-democratic authoritarian rule, reflecting the type of polity ancient thinkers such as Plato and Aristotle favored. Some of their critics on the Left charge the Straussians with harboring fascist sentiments. Although hardly a Straussian, Gottfried does not hesitate to defend them from these extreme charges. (Gottfried, “Strauss,” pp. 122-123)
In Gottfried’s interpretation, and he is not alone here, Strauss and his supporters realize the need for objective values in order to provide a normative basis for the modern liberal democratic state. Moreover, Gottfried points out that Straussians ahistorically present classical thinkers as friendly to the Straussian concept of American liberal democracy. It should be noted, however, that Gottfried sees modern liberal democracy as essentially a managerial state—a state run by a managerial elite promoting the modern shibboleths of freedom and equality, but not necessarily allowing for either majority rule, traditional individual rights, or the rule of law when these would conflict with neoconservative interests and concerns.
Another often noted aspect of the Straussian school is their distinction between esoteric and exoteric writings. They claim that what noted political thinkers wrote for the public, that is, their exoteric writing, did not always reflect their actual (esoteric) beliefs. They took this approach to avoid punishment by the authorities while trying to convey the esoteric beliefs to the enlightened few. Straussians believe they are able to divine these esoteric beliefs. Gottfried dismisses this idea, contending that Strauss and “his disciples typically find the esoteric meaning of texts to entail beliefs they themselves consider rational and even beneficent.” (Gottfried, “Strauss,” p. 99)
Gottfried does not delve far into whether the Strauss and the Straussians themselves write with something like exoteric-esoteric meaning. Do they personally believe what they profess—e.g., the existence of objective truths—or do their professed ideas simply represent what, in their minds, the citizenry should believe for the good of the polity, as a modern equivalent of the “noble lies” of Plato’s “Republic”? With this in mind, it would seem that the Straussian approach could have been used to justify the reliance on spurious propaganda to generate support for the neocon war agenda in the Middle East—as alleged by the Straussians’ harsher critics. It does not appear, however, that Straussian views are actually necessary for the use of spurious war propaganda.
Gottfried stresses that Strauss and most of his followers have been liberals, not conservatives, but grants that they have been on the Right on two significant issues. They have supported the Cold War and Israel. Gottfried opines that “in discussions of Israel or Jewish nationalism, Straussians often sound like members of the Israeli Right or far Right, and this has been taken as evidence that they lean right on everything else. However, the Straussian defense of Israel is pursued within the context of defending Anglo-American liberal democracy. Israel is presented as an outpost of democratic enlightenment, and its defenses by Straussians are no different from those that emanate from such Jewish liberal Democrats as Alan Dershowitz, Abe Foxman, and Rahm Emanuel.” (Gottfried, “Strauss,” pp. 69-70)
The Jewish identity that characterizes neoconservatism seems to have appeared earlier in the Straussians. Whereas members of the first generation of neoconservatives such as Norman Podhoretz do not seem to have championed specifically Jewish ethnic issues, especially Israel, until the late 1960s, Gottfried notes that “A profound preoccupation with his Jewishness runs through Strauss’s life” and that “Strauss’s concerns were more Jewish-centered than were the politics of other German Jewish thinkers.” (Gottfried, “Strauss,” p. 19)
As a young man Strauss associated with the Zionist Right, and “revered” Zeev Jabotinsky, who as Gottfried points out was the leader of “a wing of the Zionist movement [“Revisionist Zionism”] that wished to occupy both sides of the Jordan, even at the cost of subjugating or expelling the Arabs.” (Gottfried, “Strauss,” p. 20)
Although Gottfried does not dwell at length on Jabotinsky’s position, it should be noted that Jabotinsky emphasized the primacy of military force in foreign policy. Jabotinsky’s most remembered phrase was the “iron wall,” from the title of an essay he wrote in 1923. Jabotinsky’s essay holds that the Arabs would never voluntarily accept a Jewish state and would naturally oppose it. To survive, the Jewish state would have to establish an “iron wall” of military force that would crush all opposition and force its Arab enemies into total surrender. From this position of unassailable strength, the Jewish state could make, or dictate, peace. It was the “iron wall” strategy that would characterize the thinking of the Israeli Right, and its reliance on military force is reflected in the neocons’ Middle East war agenda.
Gottfried writes that Strauss continued to exhibit “Zionist loyalties” after immigrating to the United States and establishing himself as an “academic celebrity” at the University of Chicago in the 1950s. Gottfried points out that “Many of Strauss's most intimate students, such as Allan Bloom, Harry V. Jaffa, Ralph Lerner, Stanley Rosen, Harry Clor, William Galston, Abram Shulsky, Werner Dannhauser, Seth Benardete, Steven Salkever, Hadley Arkes, and his frequent collaborator, Joseph Cropsey, have been Jewish—and strong supporters of Israel and usually of the Israeli Right.” (Gottfried, “Strauss,” p. 22)
While Gottfried contends that Straussians defend Israel as a paragon of enlightened liberal democratic values, he shows that Strauss himself identified with aspects of Israel that were clearly illiberal, at least by modern standards. For example, in a letter to the conservative “National Review” (Jan. 5, 1956), responding to previously published criticism of Israel for showing “racist hostility” to the Palestinians, Strauss praised Zionism and Israel for helping “to stem the tide of progressive leveling of ancestral differences.” Gottfried notes here that “Strauss was arguing not so much for Israel’s Western character as insisting that it be considered ‘conservative’ because it is authentically Jewish.” (Gottfried, “Strauss,” p. 23)
The Straussian position on Jewishness and Israel serves to provide greater documentation for the Jewish and Zionist nature of neoconservatism. And it seems that this feature accounts for the strongest similarities between the two groups.
Although Strauss had been popular with some American conservatives in the 1950s for his defense of Western values and his hawkish position toward the Soviet Union, he and most of his followers remained within the orbit of American political liberalism, essentially being Cold War liberals and loyal supporters of the Democratic Party. Like those individuals who became the neoconservatives (See: “The Transparent Cabal,” pp. 25-43), the Straussians began their move to the American Right in the late 1960s and early 1970s, and they did so for similar reasons. “When the Straussians broke from the leftward-drifting Democrats,” Gottfried contends, “they were still politically different from what could be described as the traditionalist American Right. They were not looking to return to an older America. They in fact generally liked the way things were going, until the New Left came on the scene. And while like Strauss, they called for resisting Soviet pressures in international affairs, they had no serious complaints about the direction taken by the welfare or the nonviolent civil rights movement.” (Gottfried, “Strauss,” p. 169) Gottfried’s description here is quite like the description of those who formed the incipient neoconservative movement and who identified with the Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal and with much of Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society.
It is worthy of note that in discussions of the Straussians, their Jewish and pro-Israel orientation is readily mentioned in books produced by mainstream publishers. While Gottfried certainly relies on primary sources, he also references other works that also make this case. This information on the Straussian motivation should serve to reinforce the idea that these factors have been the motivation behind neoconservatism. It is thus highly ironic that this information becomes taboo when one connects the dots as I did in “The Transparent Cabal” to show that people with an ethnic loyalty to Israel have played a significant role in determining America’s war-oriented Middle East policy, which led to the US attack on Iraq and threatens to bring about a major conflagration with Iran.
Analyse de l’explication eschatologique de l’histoire
Sur l’approche eschatologique de l’histoire
Nous n’avons pas à faire de prophétie quant à l’issue de cette alternative.
Dans une parousie ou dans un cataclysme, voila d’abord notre rôle. Il est déjà superflu de dire qu’il exige de nous toutes les vertus inhérentes à un témoignage valable.
Mais au delà ou en deçà de ce témoignage nous devons aussi, par la nature des choses, assumer notre rôle de frères des autres hommes pour sauver avec eux notre commun destin.
Si le premier problème est essentiellement moral, le second est moral et social à la fois.
Si le premier se pose uniquement en termes d’authenticité, le second se pose en termes d’authenticité et d’efficacité à la fois.
C’est ce dernier qui occupe notre attention d’autant plus qu’il recoupe le premier ou le pose immédiatement.
Car si nous nous demandons comment être authentiques et efficaces, bien que les deux termes recouvrent deux notions
différentes, notre réponse est unique. C’est par l’Islam uniquement que nous pourrons répondre aux deux exigences du problème posé.
Mais il nous faut donner à l’Islam pensé et vécu par chacun de nous la dimension d’une «vérité travaillante».
Cela veut dire que cette vérité doit se faire promesse d’avenir fraternel pour tous les hommes.
C’est à ce prix qu’une ère où s’accumulent tant de signes d’apocalypse se transforme en ère de fraternité abrahamique et plus largement en fraternité adamique.
Sur le Khalifat comme solution.
Quand à l’or monnaie.
Quand aux révolutions arabes.
Sur les Banques islamiques.
AL JAZEERA la chaine qatari
Mohammad Mahatir
Le Dajjal un scénario probable de guerre nucléaire
La postérité d’Israël et le sens coranique de son second ou dernier retour
La promesse divine (’accomplissement de la seconde) s’est-elle déjà réalisée pour eux ou est-elle encore à se réaliser ?
Quand a eut lieu la première ?
De quel sanctuaire s’agit-il ? Celui de Salomon, celui de Jérusalem, celui de Babel ?
Gog et Magog
La Sourate al Kahf est une sourate de dynamique, de mouvement, d’espoir et de destin : Ne pas se soumettre à la fatalité. On ne peut pas aller contre l’évidence du Coran qui montre Dhul Qarnayn libérateur et civilisateur. On ne peut pas aller contre l’évidence du Hadith qui dit
Notre modèle : le Prophète (saws)
• un foncier aux mains des Juifs,
• la pratique usuraire,
• le capital financier aux mains des Juifs,
• le marché aux mains des Juifs,
• l’industrie (fabrication d’outillages et d’armements) aux mains des juifs,
• insalubrité de Madinah,
• les voies commerciales et les routes d’approvisionnement sous contrôle des tribus païennes arabes hostiles,
• la mobilisation de troupes militaires arabes financées par les riches commerçants arabes, les Juifs et les Chrétiens d’Arabie ou du Yémen, les Perses et les Byzantins,
• la trahison des Juifs et des Hypocrites qui n’ont pas respecté le pacte citoyen de Médine,
• les menaces d’envahissement de l’Arabie par les Perses et les Byzantins,
• Toutes les civilisations en Asie, en Europe, en Afrique étaient antinomiques avec le monothéisme de l’Islam,
• un peuple musulman pas encore totalement libéré de l’héritage païen et chargé d’entrer dans l’histoire comme libérateur et civilisateur…
Ce que dit le Coran est plus important que ce que disent tous les savants réunis
Conclusion
a – je n’ai pas recours à l’analyse eschatologique ni messianique ni talmudique pour lire l’histoire ou l’économie
b – l’or et l’argent ne sont pas une panacée pour la monnaie ni pour la justice sociale. Il faut étudier l’histoire des faits et de la pensée économique.
3 – Je suis un praticien de l’économie, je ne suis pas un conférencier théologique. L’Inspection générale des Finances (IGF) de l’Algérie en début 90 m’a donné un quitus : j’ai pris en charge une entreprise avec 12 Milliards de dinars anciens et j’étais renvoyé en la laissant avec 3 Milliards anciens de bénéfice. J’ai conjugué foi, probité, compétence et confiance aux jeunes Algériens qui ont travaillé sous ma direction dans un système pourtant corrompu et inéquitable.
http://liberation-opprimes.net/analyse-de-lexplication-eschatologique-de-lhistoire/
L'etat francais a organise le coup d'etat de 1992, la guerre civile en Algerie, les attentats de 1995 et les massacres de civils. Le jugement du boucher juif sioniste Nejjar, agent des services francais, doit permettre de faire condamner l'etat francais dont les ministeres de la defense (DGSE), l'interieur (DST-RG-DCRI), la justice (parquet 'anti-terroriste') et les affaires etrangeres (Quai d'orsay) pour complicite de crimes de guerre, et de crimes contre l'humanite, genocide organise depuis Paris. Il est imperatif que tous les Maghrebins victimes du nazisme de l'etat francais, depuis le coup d'etat, l'attaquent devant des juridictions internationales et demandent des reparations.
Dismembering the Arab World
The first group includes NATO-led heads of states, with a barely disguised Israeli master-plan conceived by the likes of Bernard-Henri Lévy. Rather than being the friends of Syria, these personalities are arguably working to secure their own financial interests in, around, and via Syria. The two Arab politicians are the two foreign ministers ofSaudi ArabiaandQatar. They have declared that those forces acting violently against the Syrian state should be armed and financially supported. In short, these conventions of the so-called ‘Friends of Syria’ are probably no more than a ‘modern’ version of those meetings conducted by Viceroy Lord Curzon, who, in 1903, addressed the ‘Chiefs of the Arab Coast’ on HMS Argonaut in Sharjah (UAE).
The Qataris and Saudis give financial support to the ‘rebels’ for weapons, payments to fighters and mercenaries, and logistical oversight of attacks on Syria. All of this is in addition to their support with telecommunication services, combat tactics, and strategic military advice. Unsurprisingly, the Western military advisors, who operate for the armed groups behind the scenes, do not feature in any media outlets. Neighbouring states also provide geographical assistance to the armed groups, with Jordan providing a passage for mercenaries from Libya, and Turkey acting as the northern military base for operations.
Turkey is involved because of its wish to align itself with the Saudi-Sunni, NATO-backed line and also its fear that a dismembered Syria would lead to the promotion of Kurdish autonomy. In their eyes, this could bring about the eventual union of the Kurds with Iraqi and Syrian Kurds and then lead to civil war with Turkey and the eventual separation of Kurdistan from Turkey and the creation of a Kurdish state.
For its part, Israel has for decades planned, as part of its strategy to dominate the Middle East and the Mediterranean, to weaken Syria in order to continue its occupation of the Syrian Golan Heights and to dominate water sources. Essentially, Israel wants to be the main economic and military power in the region and indeed, Israel may well emerge from the weakening ofSyria as the main winner, if only in the short-term.
Through its orchestrated media campaigns transmitted over the decades to its own public,Israel has constructed a concept of Syria as the major threat to its existence in the Arab world. Arguably, the governmental vacuum that might be created in Syria could be filled by al-Qaeda-like groups giving sufficient justification for Israel’s actions (against Syria and/or Iran) and would also promote the idea of a conflict between ‘civilized-democratic’ Israel and ‘savage’ Islamists.
Despite huge differences between Syria and Libya, Syria’s fate could be similar to that of Libya in terms of direct foreign intervention, were not Russia and China firmly opposed such actions at the UN, where there has been consistent cooperation between the two. Although the origins of Sino-Soviet relations go back to the early days of the 1917 Communist Revolution, it seems that, even two decades after the dismantlement of the Eastern Bloc, the Russian Federation and the Republic of China are, more than ever, following what Mao Tse-tung advised in his ‘Be a True Revolutionary’ address on 23 June 1950. Here, Tse-tung said that ‘in the international sphere we must firmly unite with the Soviet Union’ (see Selected Works of Mao Tsetung, vol. V. p. 39). Shared ideology, world vision, economic interests, and objectives in the field of energy have brought Russia and China ever closer together over the Syrian conflict.
World oil production is headed by Saudi Arabia, with Russia second, the USA third, Iran fourth and China fifth. In terms of oil reserves, we find that the top ten states are:1) Venezuela, 2) Saudi Arabia, 3) Canada, 4) Iran, 5) Iraq, 6) Kuwait, 7) UAE, 8) Russia, 9) Kazakhstan and 10) Libya. Russia is the largest gas producer in the world, with Europe dependent on its gas sourcing. In world gas production, if, because of their geographical distance, we exclude the USA and Canada, Iran comes second and Qatar third. In terms of gas reserves, Russia is number one, with Iran and Qatar in fourth place and Saudi Arabia in sixth. With neighbouring Saudi Arabia as one of the ten leading producers of gas in the world, it is clear why the export interests of Qatar and Saudi Arabia are particularly important and this ranking should give us a clear idea of the alliances that have formed in light of the Syrian conflict.
Saudi Arabia and Qatar (which in different circumstances could have been one state and might yet experience a geographical reshuffle) are both Arab-Muslim-Sunni and both have economic interests. Qatar’s greedy pursuit of marketing contracts for Libyan gas and oil supplies explains its agreement with NATO to attack Libya, its symbolic participation in the air strikes and its support for the rebels to establish a media capability.
Qatar’s aim is to export its gas toEurope, compete with the Russians and gain important political bargaining chips. In order for the export of Qatari gas to Europe to be feasible and competitive, a gas pipe must be laid through Syria. As Russia’s long-standing ally and with the precedents of numerous joint deals dating back to the USSR era, Syria is unlikely to allow anything to threaten the destabilization of Russia’s interests in their last strategic stronghold in the Arab world. This is the main reason why Qatar and Saudi Arabia are supporting the opposition’s struggle to topple the Syrian government.
Syria is fast becoming a Pandora’s box from which all the historical crises of the last 120 years are re-emerging. These begin with the Russo-Turkish war in 1877-8, the Russo-Japanese war in 1904, WWI and WWII and the Cold War. Normally, it takes a superpower 2-3 decades to emerge. It took the USA nearly 25 years to emerge as a superpower from 1890 to the end of WWI. After the death of Lenin in 1924, the USSR was the sick man of Europe. In 1945, after WWII and under Stalin, it emerged as a superpower. After Gorbachev, Russia ceased to be a superpower and seemingly, the Cold War ended. In just over two decades, Putin has ended the unipolar system and a new bipolar world is emerging – as if the Cold War had never ended.
Close examination of the Syrian political system reveals that Syrian president Bashar al-Assad is, indeed, a reformist. However, in Syria, as in any other state, factions are intertwined in power-struggles and these and the necessary processes of socialization will take some time to work through. Whilst, as Assad said, it takes just a couple of minutes to sign a new law, it takes much longer to educate people to absorb and participate in the implementation of the new values those laws enshrine. Western ruling elites’ portrayal of these new norms as seemingly growing on trees is an act of disutility and definitely immoral.
Syria was the last secular, socially-cohesive Arab state based on a top-down secular ideology. Despite its volatile, geopolitical surroundings (Lebanon, Turkey, Israel, Jordan and Iraq), Syrian citizens lived securely under this Arab secularism. Syria encompasses a particular type of pluralism and multiculturalism, embedded with religious tolerance and a pluralist existence. This is demonstrated by the toleration of a church, a mosque, a bar and the equal coexistence of both secular and veiled women. In fact, the reform process begun in Syria is more advanced than any similar process in any other Arab state. It includes the removal of emergency laws, the implementation of party laws, election laws, a key media law, and the approval of a new constitution including the removal of the article on the sole leadership of the al-Ba’ath party. Such reforms are part of a genuine political process that will take time. However, this reform process has been totally and intentionally undermined by forces, including Western governments acting against the Syrian state. In the last decades, and particularly since 9/11, the West has continually propagated the notion that Islamist terrorists have been threatening the secular way of life. However, Sunnis, technically the religious majority in Syria, contain large segments, and are no less secular than any other Western society.
So, despite Syrians’ clear right to defend the secularity of their way of life, the aim of the West is to dismantle the Syrian state, alter the power structure, and create new demo-geographic entities such as a confederation of the Syrian and Iraqi Kurds, which at present, is Turkey’s nightmare. Specific areas might also be depopulated, which might then be used, as has been done with the Druze, to repopulate with Syrian Christians and perhaps with Christians from Lebanon. Other Christians would leave the Levant altogether. The Alawites would then have another state, linked perhaps, with Iran.
The plan is to destroy the modern Arab state of Syria that emerged after WWI and in the 1940s, and, where possible, to establish new religious states (similar to the Jewish state of Israel). In this way, Arab power and along with it, the Pan-Arab ideology of Michel Aflaq and Antun Sa’ade (both Arab Christians) and Nasser of Egypt, would disappear. This process began when, in 1978-9 under Sadat, Egypt signed its peace treaty with Israel, and was followed by the destruction of Lebanon in 1982, the second Intifada in 1987, and the economic takeover of Iraq in 2003. It was then followed in Libya with the seizing of oil and gas in 2011. Therefore, in order to keep the US-Rael (US-Israel) hegemony, the West needs to align states along sectarian lines (Sunni-Shiite) rather than on Pan-Arabism. Indeed, this process was boosted after the occupation of Iraq and the toppling of the Ba’ath party.
In practice, what is now happening in the Arab world is a ‘correction’ of the 1916 Sykes-Picot agreement, when the main colonial powers, Britain and France, carved out the boundaries of the current Arab states and installed their own Arab agents. These ongoing, neo-colonial plans include provision for any two or more Arab parties to fight the Syrian regime and to keep them fighting until such time as each state is dismembered and fractured into 2-3 states, based on sectarian lines. Then colonial elites can continue to scoop up the wealth because, after all, the imperial mentality has hardly changed.
Since Western powers cannot achieve this on their own, they need agents such as Qatar in Libya and Saudi Arabia, Qatar and others in Syria. These agents, preferably self-serving, undemocratic Arab-Muslim-Sunni monarchies, will use Sunni-Islam to promote fanaticism against other Arabs, Muslims and non-Muslims (e.g., Arab Christians, Shiites and Druze). Those Arabs with access to the (economic) global elite (for example, the Royal Saudi family and the Qataris with the Americans and other European elites) are, by and large, the ruling elites in the Arab Gulf or their protégés. It is they who are driving a wedge between the various sects and magnifying and exploiting the playing of the Sunni card with non-Arab Muslim Sunni Turkey against Syria. It would hardly be a surprise either if they were in cahoots with Israel-serving Western powers. Otherwise, it would remain fairly difficult to explain why the most authoritarian regime on earth, Saudi Arabia, is acting against Syria and trying to teach it lessons in democracy, something that Saudi Arabia is not very keen to know much about.
The negative, orientalist, propaganda campaigns conducted against Syria in the past year with the financial backing of some Gulf countries have intentionally obscured elements within Syria, such as Syria’s secularism – something with which Western societies would naturally identify. So, the importance of Syria’s largely secular Ba’ath Party ideology, which guaranteed at least private liberties, has been kept hidden. This is for example in addition to the fact that Daoud Rajhah, the assassinated Syrian Minister of Defence, was a Christian, as was Dr Nabil Zughaib, the recently assassinated (along with his family) head of the Syrian missile programme.
The above examples of a deliberate elimination of facts are arguably due to Syria’s alliance with Russia, which is the ‘wrong’ camp. This close relationship between Syria and Russia has lasted for over five decades. Furthermore, Syria is the soft (Alawaite/Shiite-secular) underbelly between NATO refusnik (Shiite) Iran and Shiite HizboAllah in Lebanon. Whilst in Israel’s short-term eyes, the main opposition to its domination is Iran (as well as HizboAllah, Syria, and formerly, Hamas), Syria is now, therefore, the target. As such, Syria is now taking the punishment, so that the whole metaphoric body will eventually be dismembered.
But what is the relevance of Hamas Here? Until it democratically won the elections in 2006 (nearly two years after the assassination of Yasser Arafat), and then a year later staged a coup against the Fatah-controlled Palestinian Authority in the Gaza Strip, Hamas was a resistance movement supported by Iran, Damascus, and HizboAllah. If Iran is the metaphoric ‘head’ and HizboAllah and Hamas the two legs, Syria has been the ‘belly’ or the ‘heart’ and ‘lungs’ of this ‘body’ of resistance. But since Hamas has run the Gaza Strip, it has largely ceased to be a resistance movement and has become institutionalized. Here, Israel (and Sharon in particular) won a tactical victory. At hardly any cost, Israel withdrew from the Gaza Strip, while keeping it under siege, attacking it at will and giving the keys to the prisoners (Hamas) to run for them the largest open-air prison on earth. And all this was done without Hamas even realizing what was going on. Perhaps someone thought that the name could be beautified and, instead of prison, it might turn into an EmiRison (Emirate and prison).
In the first half of 2012, Hamas’ leaders left Damascus, where their headquarters were, and are now keeping publicly quiet and refraining from supporting the Syrian government – a government, which has supported them for more than two decades. With the victory of the Muslim Brotherhood in Tunisia and Egypt, and their rise in Libya, Hamas now seems to have new and powerful patrons, and in countries where it can operate from a much more powerful position. Hamas’ leadership (both in the Diaspora and in the Gaza Strip) has been invited by the newly elected Egyptian president, to join, the Muslim Brotherhood (their mother organization) as equals. What seemed until yesterday to be a resistance movement (though some may argue that they were never revolutionary, unlike other leftist Palestinian factions, such as the PFLP, DFLP, etc.), is now woven into the embroidery of a Sunni-Muslim alliance which has started to act under the wing of NATO.
Western orientalists like to imagine what needs to happen for their interests in the Orient to be served. They begin by labeling the Arab world the ‘Middle East’, as if it were just a geographical marker placed only in relation to where they themselves are. In order to secure their planned thievery, they invent terms to obfuscate and justify their covert or overt military actions. However, their security/intelligence services always fail to predict developments in the Arab world such as the Intifada of 1987 and the Hamas coup in 2007. Still, their superficial and ignorant power-elites never cease to manufacture new names and processes, the latest of which is the naming of whatever started in Tunisia as the ‘Arab Spring’.
What is happening in some Arab states and in the Arab world is no ‘Spring’: it is a reactionary process which will bounce back, as the USA experienced in Afghanistan, where the US both created and supported the same jihadists they later fought against. So, the US-Israel has been trying to cut deals with the Islamists in power so that they may control the masses. Indeed, this is not the first time that political strategists have tried to use religion to avoid chaos and defend their economic interests. This is similar to what Machiavelli described (based on the account of the Roman historian Titus Livius (Livy) Patavinus (59 BC-17 AD), who wrote Books from the Foundation of the City) and referred to in Discourses on Livy, when he sub-headed a chapter as: ‘How the Romans made religion serve to reorder the city and carry out their enterprise to stop tumults’.
So, Western propaganda campaigns against Syria seek to convince the public (the ‘plebs’) to fear religion rather than obey their current Arab leaders. This is why, despite the censored protests in the three Arab kingdoms (KSA, Morocco and Jordan), the world has hardly (because of censorship, gate-keeping and lack of Western media attention) seen any substantial protests compared to those in other Arab republics. One of the reasons was that there was hardly anyone to promote any special well-funded media campaigns and to pay the huge sums required. (This is perhaps with the exception of Bahrain, and the possible influence of Iran). However, there is no guarantee that a counter-hegemonic campaign would still succeed in these Arab monarchies.
After defeating the rival al-Rashid clan in 1921, the al-Saud family currently rules in most of the historical Arabian Peninsula. Its regional prominence is also due to control of the holy sites of Mekka and Medina and its alliance with, and use of, Wahabism as well as its oil and mineral resources. These resources subsidize its related cultural (media) industry. Nevertheless, religious and economic factors are evidently complex, interwoven and involve a large social network. This combination may be expressed in what I call ‘The Saudi ethic, the spiritual buck’ - somewhat similar to Weber’s ‘Protestant Ethic thesis’ which stood behind the accumulation of wealth in northernEurope.
Through the accumulation of capital in theGulf statesin the 1970s (controlled by Anglo-American protection through treaties that brought large numbers of Arabs to be either economically dependent (through employment in the Gulf), or spiritually dependent through control of Arab media), the oil boom created a new social stratification in the Arab world. As a result, some Arab societies have been dependent on and accepting of the authority of the ruling Saudi family and its clans. These elites are part of the ruling economic elites who own some of the most valuable energy projects, valuable assets and properties in the West, including Harrods, football teams, property on the Champs Élysées and partnerships with Rupert Murdoch, to mention but a few.
The recent discovery that Arabs want their freedom is chiefly promoted by some Arab and Western media institutions which are themselves an extension of policy makers who have their own economic objectives, strategies and tactics. The media campaigns that are being conducted by neo-conservative capitalist, Zionists such as Bernard-Henri Lévy, who aggressively serves Israel, and who has a strong affinity to fundamentalist Judaism, aim only to separate Arabs from their wealth and resources, whilst, at the same time, deceiving them.
This is done through the dual strategy of manufacturing a separate narrative for two separate segments of the population. To the religious, corruption is associated with faithlessness, while to the entire Arab nation they sell the very appealing dream of freedom, justice, and liberty. Naturally, each individual will interpret this according to his or her own upbringing, socialization, politicization, norms and values. So, whilst all might meet in the ‘square’, the Islamists will believe Islamic scripts to be the solution, liberals will recall Jean-Jacques Rousseau, the ‘separation of powers’ of Montesquieu and the French Revolution, Marxists will think of the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 and class struggle and the Maoists will think of the Cultural Revolution of Mao Tse-Tung or Nasserism (after all, when a group of Egyptian army officers conducted a coup and a revolution in 1952, Mao Tse-Tung declared that ‘the struggle against corruption and waste is a major issue which concerns the whole party’ (30 November, 1951) and it therefore fits the bill of fighting corrupt Arab regimes). Meanwhile, those who dream of Castro and Che Guevara will run to the ‘barricades’ in the squares in a stand off against the state security forces.
In fact, all of these values are just non-starters in the Arab world and Zio-Liberals know this. The reality is that, because of social control and the way Arab societies have been socialized in the last century (including the impact of colonial heritage) and because of the wealth Wahabi Islam (and modern Salafis) have enjoyed from oil revenues, except for the Islamic faction, the other ideologies will make little progress but rather will simply ensure the victory of the religious movements.
True, the Arab world has been heterogeneous, though only mildly. Religion has prevailed even in states like Jordan where, for decades, Islamists controlled most school curricula. Thus, in every Arab state that has had unrest, and particularly so in Egypt, there is a fierce power struggle over the constitution. The Muslim Brotherhood and Salafis won the majority of seats in the parliamentary elections, and the first democratically elected president, Muhammad Mursi (elected only by quarter of citizens), is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood. Major powers are working towards promulgating a constitution based on a relevant interpretation of Sharia laws. In his ‘Morphology of the State’, Aristotle suggests that there is a need to ‘consider not only which constitution is best, but also which is practicable and most easily within reach’ (p. 103). In the eyes of the religious fundamentalists, this can be the Sharia laws, whilst a solution for the Western ruling elites is in place.
As they have secured their economic interests through religious-elite controlled media institutions, they will in turn benefit from their own social, economic and political centres of power, and a new niche of businessmen will emerge from the circles/classes of the religious elites. Religious groups will also increase their economic participation alongside political participation. Since it will benefit their political jihad, some will see this as halal whether inside or outside the framework of Islamic banking. Social division will, however, remain or widen and the only difference is that the names have changed. Instead of a ‘Mubarak’, it will be someone else (but this time, someone with a beard) and these apparent ‘changes’ will simply maintain political control.
The affected populations are those defined as ‘minorities’ – mainly Arab Christians (around 30 million of them in the Arab world), secular (Sunni and Shiite) Muslims and others. In Egypt, Mohammad Zawahiri (the brother of al-Qaeda leader Ayman Zawahiri) has already declared that Egyptian Christians should pay a tax as Dhimmi’s (infidels) or else leave Egypt. And if they refuse, he has suggested they be confronted and coerced.
An example of mobilizing the population through religion in the media has been adopted by the Saudi monarch himself. During Ramadan 2012, Abdallah of Saudi Arabia and his heir launched a fundraising campaign supposedly in aid of the Syrian people – or so the slogan said. This campaign was based on Islamic moral norms and sense of community, especially those emphasized during the holy month of Ramadan. Whilst selling his people messages of community and compassion, these campaigns are used for both local and regional political purposes. A similar campaign launched by Syria for the liberation of Saudi Arabian women, and the need for them to drive, is unimaginable.
Besuited, Goebbels-like liberals who stand alongside those chiefs of sheikhdoms, have so far, attempted to deceive part of Arab public opinion and to manufacture a consensus against the Syrian government, and so diverted from themselves the heat of their own ‘streets’. Whilst they themselves adhere to the most archaic norms and beliefs regarding freedom and democracy, they instigate mass deception against Syria that is, in terms of its social norms, such as women’s freedoms, religious minorities’ rights, equal opportunities and personal liberties, etc., much closer to liberal Western countries. In much the same way as the Arab regimes would like to rally domestic public opinion in support of Palestinians, Gulf regimes are using the false argument that they are against the oppression of Syrians by their own government to rally their ‘streets’ against Syria. And this despite the fact that they themselves are light years behindSyriain terms of freedom and democracy.
Western governments are no friends of liberal democracy in the Third World. They inevitably deal with those governments with the worst records of human rights and then only when it is of financial benefit to them. Just as in July 2008, when Nicolas Sarkozy and current archenemy of Syria, the Emir of Qatar, formed, with the Syrian leadership, the ‘Union of the Mediterranean’, some European governments think they also might benefit financially from the crisis in the Arab world. This is particularly so when they have the support of rich Gulf States and believe they can somehow reduce the economic crises they are facing.
In some parts of Syria personal security has diminished since March 2011 and central government has not been always notable for its moral conduct. However, as part of a strategic political campaign, the media are intentionally lying about the situation in Syria. They instill fear in the Syrian public and affect exaggerated concern for casualties and loss of life. Thus, they construct a narrative, which facilitates and justifies increased assistance to the armed groups, separatists, terrorists, and mercenaries. The same media also portray the Syrian government as solely responsible for the violence, when in fact, those who recruit, pay and supply weapons to easily malleable, unemployed and cash-hungry individuals are themselves really responsible.
There are two main culprits for the increase in casualties: lying and the silencing of any opposing voice. With their Arab allies, NATO switched off the signal for the satellite connection of the Syrian al-Dunia satellite channel. Other acts of satellite ‘terror’ arguably included the CIA’s hijacking of al-Dunia’s Twitter account, so as to disseminate disinformation about the Syrian army’s false retreat. The same Arab satellite that Syria helped found after the loss of the second part ofPalestinein 1967, is now being used against it by those formerArab Gulf sheikhdoms.
This satellite is now being used in the conflict in Syria – but against Syria – and includes disinformation chiefly by Gulf-owned channels that promote fear and panic about economic instability in Syria. The media are being used and manipulated as a cover for the incitement of terrorist action by the Syrian opposition and also to garner economic aid, and this same media then present the sanitized, ‘heroic’ achievements of the ‘rebels’ and, when necessary, depict any losses they encounter as ‘massacres’.
By and large, Western and mainstream Arab media are left with nearly only one option: to swallow disinformation from unreliable ‘spin’ bodies, which they then pump out to the public. Stories of massacres by the Syrian government are, for propaganda purposes, broadcast to justify foreign intervention, and the prevailing image is that of the noble West coming to save an incapable, oppressed Third World nation from the tyranny of a chauvinist male oppressor. This is exactly what happened in Libya. Nonetheless, a minority of Arab media is opposing the master plan and another minority are sitting on the fence. The Arab media are mostly, either directly or indirectly, in the hands of Gulf States, while any other journalists either operate discreetly on the payroll of those forces or are totally deluded and find it impossible to grasp the tragic ramifications of what is taking place in the Arab world. The anti-war values of Bertolt Brecht’s Mother Courage are most probably not high on the agenda in some oil rich states, since they might expose the dichotomy between religion and war economy even further.
NATO nations can never escape: even left-wing governments and parties are infiltrated by Atlanticists
By Wayne Madsen,
In 1974, Greece withdrew from NATO’s military command structure in protest over the Turkish occupation of northern Cyprus. However, conservative New Democracy Prime Minister Konstantine Karamanlis, a fervent supporter of NATO, rejoined NATO’s military command structure in 1980.
Declassified Central Intelligence Agency documents point to a major program by the United States to woo leaders of European NATO countries to support the alliance, even though they may have been committed left-wingers and, at least in public, against NATO policies.
A case example of a country where the CIA successfully co-opted left-wing leaders to support NATO’s agenda is Denmark. A formerly Confidential CIA memorandum, produced by the agency’s National Foreign Assessment Center and dated January 31, 1980, details the CIA’s program to ensure that Denmark’s left-of-center Social Democratic Party refrain from defense budget cuts and supported NATO’s decision to modernize its theater nuclear force (TNF) by deploying 572 ground-launched cruise missiles (GLCM) and Pershing II nuclear-armed missiles in Western Europe. The decision by NATO was seen in Moscow as a major reason to launch an invasion of Afghanistan because Soviet leaders felt they had nothing to lose by responding to NATO’s missile deployments in Europe.
The CIA obviously viewed Denmark’s Social Democratic government, with its strong pacifist tendencies as a threat to the NATO TNF modernization program. It is also clear that Danish Prime Minister Anker Jorgensen, who, on the surface appeared to be left wing, was firmly in NATO’s camp. The CIA memo points out: “Jorgensen is likely to face growing pressure on defense issues including NATO’s theater nuclear forces from the more pacifist parliament elected in October.”
The October election strengthened the Social Democrats at the expense of the conservative. Pro-NATO parties and brought an end to the previous coalition between the Social Democrats and the conservative Liberal Party. The CIA set out to rally its supporters, including Jorgensen, to the NATO cause and to neutralize the parliamentary power of the committed anti-NATO parties of the left, including the Radical Liberals, Left Socialists, and Socialist People’s Party. The CIA had the conservative parties under its control and it was from the ranks of one of them, the Liberal Party, that NATO’s current Secretary General, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, rose to the post of Prime Minister, where he was a loyal foot soldier for U.S. military aggression in Afghanistan and Iraq.
It is noteworthy that in the CIA document, Henning Christophersen, the leader of Rasmussen’s Liberal Party in parliament, is cited as “being very cautious in statements on Afghanistan. He has been unwilling to go so far as to ‘condemn’ Soviet actions there.”
After NATO pressured Jorgensen to increase Danish defense spending by 3 percent annually, he responded by stating that the 1978–81 defense budget was fixed and could not be changed. However, Jorgensen promised to seek a 3 percent increase in the 1981–85 budget.
It was clear in the CIA document that the agency felt it had the nominally-left-of-center Jorgensen in its pocket. The document states: “He [Jorgensen] believes that NATO is necessary and that the West must maintain a rough military balance with the Eastern bloc.” The CIA saw Jorgensen as a bulwark against Social Democratic “young, radical first-termers in Parliament.”
But the CIA’s ace up its sleeve on Western European TNF modernization was experienced Social Democratic politicians, all cited by the CIA document as having past and current relationships with the United States. The CIA document provided profiles of the Social Democrats in the Jorgensen government:
“Kjeld Olesen. Minister of Foreign Affairs.Olesen has always been regarded as friendly to the United States and pro-NATO. There are indications that he favored TNF modernization, and argued for it in party councils in 1979. Olesen is an ambitious politician, and given his party’s current leftward tilt on defense matters, he will need encouragement if he is to take a leadership role on behalf of NATO proposals.” {In the CIA’s world, “encouragement” often means providing some sort of favors to an individual].
The CIA had other reliable people in the Jorgensen government. The document continues:
“Poul Sogaard. Minister of Defense.Sogaard is a specialist in defense matters and, like Olesen, has strong US connections . . .
“Svend Jakobsen. Minister of Finance. A leftwing Social Democrat with close ties to labor, he would be a valuable convert to the cause of TNF modernization. He is considered friendly toward the United States . . .
“Ivar Norgaard. Minister of Economic Affairs and Energy.Norgaard is an SDP stalwart who is one of the government’s most experienced officials on international economics and energy . . . He has not taken much interest in security matters, although he has worked harmoniously with US officials on many occasions.
“Knud Heinesen. SDP parliamentary leader and Minister of Finance during 1975–79.Heinesen is perhaps Prime Minister Jorgensen’s closest adviser. Heinesen visited the United States in 1963 under the International Visitor Program, and he has returned several times since then . . . Heinesen’s connections with young, leftist SDP members would make him a valuable ally in efforts to increase defense forces.
“Poul Dalsager. Minister of Agriculture and Fisheries. He is believed to be friendly toward the United States, although he is not involved in security issues.”
K.B. Andersen. Minister of Foreign Affairs during much of the 1970s. As Foreign Minister, Andersen was generally sympathetic to US positions on security issues, but like the Prime Minister he places priority on détente.
Lasse Budtz. An SDP defense spokesman. A prolific writer and speaker on defense and the Atlantic Alliance, Budtzis pro-NATO, but he also supports measures aimed at furthering détente.”
The CIA wanted to offer those considered friendly to the United States carrots. But those who were opposed to NATO TNF modernization were also “noticed” by the CIA, including
“Svend Auken. Minister of Labor. Only 36, Auken is widely regarded as a possible future leader of the SDP. Except for antiwar statements regarding Vietnam, Auken has said little about foreign relations, but he probably cool toward defense spending. There is little chance that he can be convinced TNF is worthwhile, but any moderation of his views could be beneficial to the US.
Karl Hjortnaes. Minister of Taxation. Like many SDP leaders, he has shown little interest in security affairs, and ascribing less importance to them than to social issues. He is currently under attack by other parties for allegedly having underpaid his taxes.”
When there was the slightest indication that Denmark might drift away from NATO, the CIA decided who among Danish politicians it had in the American court and which of them were off-sides. The same playbook is used across NATO today, which should adopt the motto: “NATO: once you’re in, you can’t get out.”
This article originally appeared in Strategic Culture Foundation on-line journal. Wayne Madsen is a Washington, DC-based investigative journalist and nationally-distributed columnist. He is the editor and publisher of the Wayne Madsen Report
Depuis le coeur de la mosquee d'Al Aqsa, resistant aux assauts sionistes. Sur le mois du Ramadan (en Arabe)
Tunisian swimmer Taqi Murabit has won the entire Olympics
URGENT : Israel envahit le Sinai, attaque un poste frontiere et accuse la Resistance Palestinienne pour provoquer la fermeteure de la bande de Gaza et l'etat d'urgence en Egypte
www.palestine-info.info
Des hommes armés non identifiés ont mené une grande attaque sur le site des forces de sécurité égyptienne, à la région de la liberté surplombant l’entrée de la ville égyptienne de Rafah, au nord du Sinaï, ce qui a conduit à tuer et blesser des dizaines de soldats égyptiens, ainsi que ces armés ont également saisi un véhicule blindé appartenant aux forces de sécurité égyptiennes.
Selon des sources de sécurité et des témoins, les hommes armées ont mené une attaque sur deux points appartenant à l’armée égyptienne, à proximité de la marque internationale n° 6, au sud des deux points de passage de Rafah et celui de Karam Abou-Salem, dans la région, en utilisant des armes à feu, les mortiers de RPG et les bombes et tuant 16 soldats et officiers des forces de l’armée égyptienne, ainsi que les armés ont saisi deux véhicules blindés après avoir tiré sur l’un des points de passage puis ils ont fait exploser l’un de l’armure après la fin de l’attaque.
Selon un témoin « ces hommes portant des uniformes militaires et lourdement armés avec les roquettes de RPG, ont surpris la concentration de la sécurité égyptienne lors des repas de jeûne, et tué certains soldats par des objets tranchants, notant que les forces de l’armée égyptienne ont utilisé des armures dans la région des affrontements, dans une tentative de contrôler la situation.
Il a également ajouté que les forces de l’armée occupante ont tiré des coups de semonce, dans l’air, dans le côté palestinien occupé ainsi que des hélicoptères et des navires de troupes sionistes sont arrivés aux zones frontalières.
A son tour la direction de l’armée égyptienne a nié la participation de n’importe quel groupe d’islamique sous n’importe quel nom, alors que le brigadier-général ; Safwat El-Zayet a affirmé que « les évènements qui font rage sur la frontière égyptienne ne sont qu’un plan mis en œuvre par les services secrets occupants israéliens pour créer un conflit entre l’Egypte et la bande de Gaza et déstabiliser les relations entre les deux pays surtout après la visite d’Ismaël Haniyeh et la délégation du Hamas dirigée par Khaled Michael et afin de déstabiliser également la situation interne en Egypte.
Rafah: Le point de passage fermé suite à l'incident des frontières égypto-palestiniennes
Rafah-CPI
Des sources de sécurité au passage de Rafah ont déclaré au correspondant du CPI que « les autorités égyptiennes ont informé les autorités responsables au passage et le gouvernement de la fermeture du check-point jusqu’à nouvel avis, et cela vient dans le sillage des attaques armées au Sinaï qui ont coûté la vie d’un certain nombre de soldats égyptiens.
Il est à noter que le Président Egyptien ; Mohamed Morsi a appelé, dimanche soir 15/08, à une réunion d’urgence avec le Conseil Suprême des forces armées, après la mort de 15 éléments des gardes-frontières égyptiens dans une attaque menée par un groupe armé sur leur siège, à proximité de la frontière avec la Palestine occupée.
Easy Targets: The Persecution of Muslims in Burma
This report takes a look at the general persecution of Muslims in Burma through the eyes of Muslim villagers and townspeople. Emphasis is placed on the sizeable but mostly ignored Muslim population outside of Rakhine (Arakan) State. Muslims have lived in Burma for hundreds of years, although many arrived only after Burma’s annexation by Great Britain in the 19th Century. Racial and religious tensions have run high between Muslims and Burmans since independence in 1948. Successive Burmese regimes have encouraged or instigated violence against Muslims as a way of diverting the public’s attention away from economic or political concerns. The most recent outbreak of violence occurred in cities across Burma from February to October 2001. Burma’s draconian citizenship law makes it impossible for many Muslims to become citizens and receive national identity cards. Without the identity cards, Muslims have a difficult time travelling, getting an education or finding a job. Religious restrictions have also been placed on Muslims. There is a prohibition on the construction of new mosques and repairs to existing ones are limited to the interiors only. Groups of more than five Muslims have been prohibited from assembling in cities and towns where anti-Muslim riots occurred. Muslim religious leaders and groups are under surveillance by the SPDC. The situation has created a climate of fear among Muslims to such an extent that many feel they are always being watched and they must live their lives and practice their religion quietly and secretly.
The report also examines Karen relations with the Muslim population in Karen State, particularly the persecution of Muslims by the Democratic Karen Buddhist Army (DKBA), a Karen group allied with the SPDC. The DKBA has been involved in the destruction of mosques and the forced relocation of Muslim villagers. DKBA soldiers have tried to force Muslims to worship Buddhist monks and put up Buddhist altars. Restrictions have also been placed on Muslims to force them to become vegetarian. Both the DKBA and the SPDC force Muslims in Karen State to perform forced labour for them on a regular basis.
There are small Muslim armed groups based in Rakhine State engaged in the struggle for human rights and federal democracy like the ethnicity-based resistance groups throughout Burma; they are not fundamentalist ‘jihad’ groups, nor are they part of any real or imaginary international networks like ‘Al Qaeda’. Elsewhere in the country Muslims are generally not politically active. Forming a small minority in many of the areas where they live and facing persecution both from the state and the local population, most Muslim communities are tightly knit but very low-key, focused mainly on the daily struggle to survive and support a family. Most Muslims realise they are easy targets for the regime and are too poor to get involved in politics. The September 2001 attacks in the United States have not had much of an impact in Burma apart from further travel restrictions placed on Muslims. While the SPDC has not yet tried to gain American support by labelling Burmese Muslims as ‘international terrorists’, the possibility remains that they may attempt to do so in future. The difficult conditions faced by Muslims across Burma have forced many to go to Thailand, Bangladesh or India, where they generally have no access to refugee status so they have no choice but to join the illegal migrant labour work force.
This report is based on interviews with Muslim refugees from Karen State and Muslim travellers and traders from central Burma and the Western border conducted by KHRG researchers between October 2001 and February 2002. All of the interviews quoted in the text are with Burmese Muslims with the exception of Interview #6 with “Moe Zaw Shwe”, who is a Karen Christian. There are a higher number of examples in the text from Karen State because more of the interviews were conducted with Muslims from Karen State. Some supporting information and assistance with interviews was provided by the Muslim Information Centre of Burma (MICB). While this report focuses on Muslims, readers may want to see the following KHRG reports for further information on the treatment of Muslim communities in the areas discussed in this report: “Refugees from the SLORC Occupation” (KHRG #97-07, 25/5/97), “Strengthening the Grip on Dooplaya: Developments in the SPDC Occupation of Dooplaya District” (KHRG #98-05, 10/6/98), and “Abuses and Relocations in Pa’an District” (KHRG #97-08, 1/8/97).
This report consists of several parts: this preface, an introduction, a detailed description of the situation including quotes from interviews, and an index of interviews. The full text of the interviews compiled for this report is available as a separately published annex and is available from KHRG upon approved request.
Notes on the Text
In the interviews, all names of those interviewed have been changed and some details have been omitted where necessary to protect people from retaliation. False names are shown in double quotes. The captions under the quotes in the situation report include the interviewee’s (changed) name, gender, age and village, and a reference to the interview. These numbers can be used to find the full text of the interviews. Although measures have been taken to hide the identity of people in this report, please do not pass this report in its present form to any representatives, agents or business partners of the SPDC regime. The use of the terms ‘Rakhine’, ‘Arakan’ and ‘Rohingya’ is complex due to the political and racial significance of the terms. In this report the term ‘Rohingya’ is used to refer to Muslims in Rakhine State and ‘Rakhine’ is used to refer to the Buddhist inhabitants of Rakhine State. ‘Arakanese Muslim’ will be used in this report to differentiate between Muslims whose ancestors are indigenous to Rakhine State and Muslims whose ancestors arrived in Rakhine State during the British colonial period.
(1.3 Mb, 45 pages [size A4], Adobe Acrobat Reader freeware required)
A Divine warning from the Noble Quran to the Talmudists in Tel Aviv, Washington, London, Paris and Berlin for the next 12 years!
Surah Al Naml (The Ant), chapter 27 verses 59 to 64 recitation by Mahmud Al Hijazi.
Surat An-Naml (The Ant) - سورة النمل
Is the Pentagon developing genocidal anti-Islam bio-weapons?
The proposed bio-weapon would be distributed in flu vaccines in Muslim countries. It would alter human genomic expression to produce a sort of “chemical lobotomy,” destroying the part of the brain associated with religiosity and spirituality. In other words, it would reduce its victims to a state lower than that of animals, who, unlike humans, were not created with spirituality and religiosity as a central feature of their being.
The Pentagon plan is not only a threat to Islamic societies, but to all of humanity. The centrality of religiosity and spirituality to the human being has been confirmed by all of the prophets, saints, and sages of every culture. Indeed, this is why we were created. As the holy Qur'an says:
“We have created humankind in the most beautiful form,
Then we return him to the lowest of the low,
Except for those who keep the faith and work righteousness,
For they will have a limitless reward.
So why do you falsely claim that religion is a lie?
Is not God the most just of judges?” (Surat-at-Tîn: http://quran.com/95/)
God created us in the “most beautiful form,” but that form rebounds to become “the lowest of the low” unless we cultivate our religious and spiritual nature by “keeping the faith” and “working righteousness.” In other words, humans can be higher than the angels, or lower than the animals. It all depends on whether we accept religion as true and keep the faith (the word faith, iman, can also be translated as “heart-knowledge”) and also work righteousness. The word for righteousness has the connotation of reforming things or demanding justice - in other words, being an activist who tries to make things better. So we need to hold fast to religious faith (or heart-knowledge) while working hard to make the world better. If we do not do both of these things, we fall to a state lower than that of the lowest animal.
Here is the transcript of this leaked video:
Presenter: “On the left over here, we have individuals who are religious fundamentalists, religious fanatics. And this is the expression RTPCR, real-time PCR, expression of the VMAT2 gene. Over here, we have individuals who are not particularly fundamentalist, not particularly religious. And you can see there's a much-reduced expression of this particular gene, the VMAT2 gene, another evidence (sic) that supports our hypothesis for the development of this approach (sic).”
Audience member: “So by spreading this virus, we're going to prevent individuals from putting on a bomb vest and going into a market and blowing up the market.”
Presenter: “So our hypothesis is that these are fanatical people, that they have over-expression of the VMAT2 gene, and that by vaccinating them against this, we will eliminate this behavior. So we have some very, very remarkable data in this next slide. Here we have two brain scans - these are FMRIs - these are two different individuals with two different levels of expression of VMAT2. On top, there is an individual who is a religious fanatic, and individual who - as we have repeated numerous times - has high levels of VMAT2. Now this individual down here, who had low levels of the VMAT2 gene, this individual would self-describe as not particularly religious.
Audience member: “Are you suggesting I take a CT scan with me when I'm evaluating people deciding whether or not to put a bullet in their head?”
Presenter: “So the data that I'm presenting here supports the concept that we're proposing. And I think that we would not propose to do CT scans or FMRIs on individuals out in the hinterlands of Afghanistan. The virus would immunize against this VMAT2 gene, and that would have the effect that you see here, which is essentially to turn a fanatic into a normal person. And we think that that will have major effects in the Middle East.”
Audience member: “How would you suggest that this is going to be dispersed. By aerosol?”
Presenter: “Well, so the present plan in the tests that we've done so far, have used respiratory viruses, such as flu or rhinoviruses, and we believe that's a satisfactory way to get exposure of the largest part of the population. Most of us, of course, have been exposed to both of those viruses. And we're quite confident that this will be a very successful approach.”
Audience member: “This is fascinating. What's the name of this proposal?”
Presenter: “Yeah, so the name of this project is FUNVAX, which is the vaccine for religious fundamentalism.”
Audience member: “Do you have a proposal already?”
Presenter: “The proposal has just been submitted. And I think that the data I have shown you today would support the development of this project. And we think it has great promise.”
KB/GHN
http://truthjihad.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/is-pentagon-developing-genocidal-anti.html
Operation Merah : les mensonges des mythomanes racistes et incompetents de la DCRI, la DGSE, la justice, les affaires etrangeres, le CRIF pour mettre les populations Musulmanes de France et d'Europe a feu et a sang au nom de 'la defense d'Israel'. Notons que les israeliens publient en plein milieu des vacances et au beau milieu du mois de Ramadan. Ces gens la sont des nazis talmudistes! L'etat francais a joue la guerre et a perdu, la DCRI et la DGSE doivent payer, les tetes doivent etre coupees ou cette operation sarkozyste restera dans les annales comme le debut de la defaite militaire franco-israelienne contre les populations Musulmanes vivant en Europe. L'affaire Merah est loin d'etre terminee, la guestapo du CRIF sera demantelee de gre ou de force
Affaire Merah : à quoi joue la DCRI ?
Source
"Accablant et dérangeant. C’est ce qui ressort des documents classés secret-défense de la Direction centrale du renseignement intérieur (DCRI) concernant Mohamed Merah, déclassifiés vendredi dernier par le ministère de l’Intérieur et transmis à la justice.
Ces 23 pages de rapports confidentiels rédigées entre 2007 et 2011, dont nous avons pris connaissance, apportent la preuve que le tueur à scooter était non seulement surveillé et connu des services depuis au moins 2009, mais qu’il constituait une « CIBLE PRIVILÉGIÉE » de la DCRI pour sa proximité avec des islamistes radicaux toulousains clairement identifiés, tout comme son frère Abdelkader.
(...)
DÉCEMBRE 2011 : la menace « d’actions armées ». Un mois après son retour du Pakistan, en novembre 2011, Mohamed Merah est entendu par l’antenne locale de la DCRI à Toulouse. Si le compte rendu de l’entretien ne fait étonnamment pas partie des documents déclassifiés, un rapport rédigé le mois suivant relate néanmoins l’interrogatoire.
Lors de celui-ci, Merah « confirmait s’être rendu en Afghanistan et au Pakistan », soulignent les policiers, qui ne font même pas état du prétexte touristique avancé par Merah pour justifier son voyage. Sur les raisons de son retour, « il déclarait être revenu en France pour régler des problèmes avec la justice française ». Ces déplacements constituent une « menace directe », souligne le rapport, « car les jeunes djihadistes peuvent revenir avec pour instruction de conduire des actions armées ». Glaçante prémonition."
NB : Jusqu'à présent, officiellement, la DCRI disait qu'elle prenait Merah pour un banal "touriste". Ce qui est désormais certain, c'est qu'elle nous prenait pour des poires.
La France-Israel n'a jamais quitte l'Algerie, le Maghreb-Sahel et elle se sert du terrorisme comme excuse pour recoloniser toute l'Afrique au nom de la 'domination et la superiorite d'Israel' effacant et remplacant ainsi les colons americains, anglais, allemands et francais qui ne servent que de chaire a canon pour les plans sionistes comme on le voit en Syrie, Libye
Zionist extremist Chamish admits Bollyn is right, Zionists did 9/11!!
But one thing you can say about Chamish: He's not stupid, he has guts, and he pretty much calls it the way he sees it. At the personal level, I actually like the guy.
So when Chamish recently wrote what he intended as a hostile review of Christopher Bollyn's Solving 9/11, but couldn't help admitting that Bollyn was basically right, that the big-money Zionist mob did 9/11 with the help of Mossad and its American assets...well, that's about the highest praise Bollyn could ever get.
Chamish claims it was the "Labor Zionists" that did 9/11, and faults Bollyn for failing to exonerate the likes of Netanyahu. But the evidence shows that Bollyn is right, and Chamish is wrong: Netanyahu was obviously a key player in the 9/11 conspiracy.
Bollyn cites Netanyahu's 1979 Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism(JCIT) where the whole game-plan for the upcoming "war on terror," i.e. the war on Israel's enemies, was developed. Chamish fatuously writes: "In 1980, Netanyahu was selling furniture at the RIM company and not formulating plans for 9-11." The seminal importance of Netanyahu's JCIT in creating the "war on terror" out of whole cloth, and setting the stage for 9/11, is obvious to anyone who reads Netanyahu's book that came out of JCIT. In that compilation, arch-Zionist Orientalist Bernard Lewis reveals his plan, supported by the pro-Israel wing of Western intelligence agencies, to create a modern version of the medieval assassins - namely, al-CIA-duh - and use it to smash the Middle East to pieces on behalf of Israel (the Oded Yinon plan). If that isn't the game plan for 9/11, what is? (Bernard Lewis was the first person from outside the government to meet with George W. Bush in the immediate aftermath of 9/11; obviously he was there to quarterback 9/11 and its intended aftermath.)
If there are any doubts that Netanyahu is at the top of the list of 9/11 criminals, they should be dispelled by the reports informing us that Netanyahu and confessed insurance fraudster and 9/11 demolition criminal Larry Silverstein is such a close friend of Netanyahu's that they speak on the phone every single week.
Chamish claims that Bollyn fails to see that Likud and Netanyahu are the good guys, and the Labor Zionists the bad guys, due to Bollyn's supposedly anti-Zionist or anti-Jewish ideology. But it is actually Chamish who is letting his raving-extremist Likudnik ideology blind him to some of the simple, obvious facts of 9/11, including the involvement of his heroes Sharon and Netanyahu.
1 comments:
He also had a kind of military protection of his website. I am just speculating.
Basheer
EID MUBARAK TO ALL OUT THERE!
La voie de libération de Jérusalem
Scènes de Jérusalem du temps des croisades
http://liberation-opprimes.net
Le concile de Clairmont (ou Clermont) — aujourd’hui Clermont-Ferrand — s’est tenu en Auvergne en 1095. Le pape Urbain II l’avait convoqué pour traiter des problèmes de discipline ecclésiastique, à la suite du concile de Plaisance qui s’était tenu six mois plus tôt, mais l’un des faits notables de ce concile est l’appel qu’Urbain II à la noblesse de la chrétienté, lui demandant de lutter contre les Turcs qui selon lui menacent l’empire byzantin et de délivrer les Lieux Saints occupés par les Musulmans. Le pape Urbain II d’origine française, a été enthousiaste de lancer une « déclaration de guerre » contre les musulmans (1 ).
Après avoir évoqué les malheurs et souffrances des chrétiens d’Orient, le pape adjure les chrétiens d’Occident de cesser leurs guerres fratricides et de s’unir pour combattre les musulmans païens et délivrer leurs frères en Orient qui est une cause plus juste. En même temps les Chrétiens pourront expier leurs péchés une fois arrivés à Jérusalem. Cet appel de Clermont qui est considéré comme une véritable opération médiatique mensongère contre les musulmans est considéré comme la cause directe de la première croisade.
L’engagement et la réponse enthousiaste de la part du public chauffé à blanc par des manipulateurs de spectateurs dans une pièce de théâtre dont chacun avait son rôle à jouer pour mobiliser les foules ignorantes. Ainsi il y eut des cantiques, des appels à la guerre et des chœurs répétant les mots « Dieu veut … il veut le Seigneur » (2). … Ainsi a commencé les croisades …
Journée du massacre
Scène II:
Dans un jour de chaleur torride de ce mois de Juillet 1099 la ville de Jérusalem est tombé entre les mains des Croisés après un siège de cinq semaines. La prise de Jérusalem par les Croisés donna lieu à un terrible massacre de la ville sainte qui fut livrée et ses habitants à trois jours de pillage, de vol, de viol, de meurtre. Les corps des morts, des brulés et des mutilés restèrent exposés dans les rues et places publiques plusieurs jours.
Dans cette atmosphère de tristesse et de désolation, la ville est restée enfermée dans une immense fumée et un épais champs de poussière et d’odeurs de corps carbonisés ou en décomposition. La rencontre de Jérusalem avec les Croisés fut le symbole de l’horreur. Dans l’horreur les Croisés étaient en extase dans l’église de la Résurrection qui recueillaient les prières et les mots de remerciements adressés au Seigneur. Les les échos de « Merci Seigneur » qui sortaient de la vielle Église (3) pour s’engouffrer dans dans la ville donnaient un aspect sinistre et apocalyptique de la présence chrétienne européenne sur les terres arabo-musulmanes.
Scène III:
Un jour de ce mois d’ Octobre 1187 (27 Rajab en 538 AH), Salah eddine libère Jérusalem qui est restée otage des Francs Croisés un peu plus de quatre-vingts ans.
La reprise de Jérusalem témoigne de l’humanisme des musulmans à l’opposé des scènes brutales lors de l’ invasion barbare des Francs. Enfin l’oraison du vendredi était restaurée à Jérusalem libérée après une longue période interdite (4).
Ainsi a commencé la fin de la présence des Croisés sur les terres arabes …
Ces trois scènes ont marqué l’histoire de Jérusalem à l’époque des croisades; Cependant, la scène finale, celle de la libération par Saladin est celle à laquelle je me consacre dans cette étude. Nous retenons que l’épopée de la libération, qui était dirigé par Saladin a commencé après des moments sanglants qui ont vu Jérusaleme tomber sous la domination de la la horde barbare des Croisés au début du 11 ème siècle. Jérusalem est un symbole perverti en « symbole de croisade », « le royaume de Jérusalem ». « Saladin » a été et reste un symbole, le symbole de la résistance contre la domination étrangère, le symbole du Djihad islamique contre l’agression.Salah Eddine a consacré sa vie à la libération de Jérusalem, comme nous le verrons dans cette étude.
Les causes de la victoire et la défaite
Il serait faux de considérer la victoire des Croisés contre les musulman lors de la première croisade comme l’expression d’une réelle supériorité du rapport de forces militaires des Croisés. Sur le plan strictement militaire ils étaient numériquement, logistiquement, techniquement et scientifiquement inférieurs aux musulmans mais les combats ont été à leur avantage. Les Croisades ont été rendus possibles par la faiblesse politique du monde musulman et le déchirement intestinal entre les principautés qui favorisaient la fragmentation politique et territoriale déja avancée de l’empire musulman. Cette fragmentation politique avait des conséquences sociales et culturelles dont l’héritage de l’amertume et de la méfiance des populations arabes envers les dirigeants dans la région arabe. Ces dirigeants aveuglés par l’égoïsme et le manque de considération politique, anesthésiés par l’inertie et l’absence de vigueur, privés de la vision stratégique des intérêts de la nation musulmane ne pouvaient exercer le pouvoir ni entraîner leurs peuples à combattre.
Dans la région arabe et du temps des Croisades les principales forces politiques et institutionnelles dans la région (le califat sunnite abbasside de Bagdad et le califat chiite fatimide du Caire) se contestaient le pouvoir et l’existence tout en participant à la manifestation de la faiblesse politique et sociale et de la vulnérabilité militaire dans le monde arabe. Dans cette bipolarité belliqueuse coexistaient dans la région de l’Orient musulman une mosaïque de principautés naines qui participaient à l’émiettement de l’ensemble et à la dispersion des énergies. Tout était facteur de division : les doctrines confessionnelles, les appartenances ethniques ou tribales, les intérêts matériels…
Du point de vue sociologique et historique c’est la fragmentation politique des musulmans qui est la cause de la victoire des Croisés pourtant moins nombreux, de plus faible niveau de civilisation et de la tactique militaire que les Musulmans et les Arabes.
Du point de vue religieux et spirituel cette victoire des Croisés n’était ni le résultat de l’intervention du Seigneur ni des saints chrétiens ni l’esprit de foi des Croisés, comme le prétendent les historiens des Croisades, qui eux mêmes sont les idéologues de l’Église catholique et les admirateurs des Croisades. La victoire sans force réelle militaire ou spirituelle des Croisés a coïncidé avec l’atomisation politique conjuguée à la faiblesse morale et spirituelle des musulmans véritable cause de la défaite et de la perte des arabes et des musulmans devant leur agresseur.
Le succès inattendu des Croisés et leur création du « Royaume latin de Jérusalem » et trois Émirats sur les terres arabes en Palestine et en Syrie a provoqué un traumatisme psychologique énorme sur les populations arabes qui se sentaient trahies et humiliées. Les populations arabes avaient d’abord considéré les Croisés, au début des Croisades, comme de vulgaires mercenaires au service de l’Empire byzantin qui finiraient par partir un jour. Mais la prise de Jérusalem et les opérations colonialistes qui ont eu lieu à partir de 1099 et au-delà leur ont faite comprendre que les Croisés sont venus à leur pays pour y demeurer toujours comme conquérants. Face à eux une nouvelle réalité politique, économique militaire et religieuse, s’est douloureusement imposée à eux comme fait accompli (5).
Il était dans la logique historique que la réaction des musulmans contre le colonialisme des Croisés se fasse voir assez tôt, dès sa prise de conscience. Ainsi au Nord les Turcs Seldjoukides, le Nord ont commencé de de mener des attaques violentes sur les Croisés. La résistance turque a permis de capturer le gouverneur d’Antioche, le prince de Boimond , le comte Baudouin et Jocelyne tout en infligeant plusieurs lourdes défaites aux armées croisées.
Dans le sud, les Égyptiens ont lancé des attaques à partir de leur base à Ashkelon, en Palestine, et ont infligé de lourdes défaites dans les années 1101, 1102, 1105, mais ils n’ont pas poursuivi l’effort de résistance après ces dates en raison de problèmes internes, (6), en l’an 548 AH / 1153 les Croisés parviennent à s’emparer de la forteresse d’Ashkelon, dernier bastion de la résistance égyptienne en forteresses en Palestine contre les Croisades.
La faiblesse de l’Etat fatimide
Les Croisades coïncident avec la décadence de l’état fatimide qui avait atteint un état de vulnérabilité, qui avait déja attiré les principautés musulmanes voisines à convoiter son héritage. Il était déjà perçu comme « l’homme malade » endormi sur sur les rives du Nil, dont ne restait de sa gloire d’antan que des souvenirs et une ombre que plus personne ne craint ni ne respecte.
Ainsi a commencé la compétition entre Mahmoud Nour al-Din (qui a succédé à son père, Imad Eddin Zinqui qui avait réussi à libérer Alraha en 1144) et Amaury Ier de Jérusalem premier roi croisé de Jérusalem (1163 – 1174) (7), nommé par les sources historiques arabes « le gagnant » puisqu’il a pu instaurer son protectorat sur le Caire et l’Égypte privant Nour al-Din d’une assistance des arabes du Sud. En effet les états latins d’Orient confrontés à une Syrie musulmane puissante et unifiée vont sous la direction d’Amaury trouver soutien auprès de l’Égypte fatimide, tombé dans les derniers degrés de la décadence et en proie à des luttes de pouvoir. Dirgham fut l’homme clé d’Amaury.
La lutte de contrôle de l’Égypte dans l’échiquier des Croisades s’est cristallisé sur le poste et la personnalité du premier ministre (al wazir) qui détient les véritables leviers de commande réelle du Caire(8). Il y eut en parallèle aux affrontements armées une lutte pour le contrôle du pouvoir en Égypte entre les Croisés et la Syrie. Le premier ministre Shawir installé par Nur al-Din Mahmoud et Dirgham l’homme clé d’Amaury se livrèrent à une véritable lutte à mort qui connut de spectaculaires et incessants renversements jusqu’à la morts des deux hommes. Après six épisodes de rapports de force changeant d’un camp à l’autre Shirkuh finit par s’imposer et imposer en Égypte l’allégeance à la Syrie. Amaury attaque et remporte plusieurs succès sur Shirkuk, mais Nur ad-Din envahit à son tour les états latins en guise de diversion pour protéger son lieutenant, prend les places fortes d’Arim et de Paneas et capture Bohémond III d’Antioche à Harrim le 11 août 1164. Seule l’intervention des byzantins empêche les musulmans de prendre Antioche. Shirkuh fut nommé par la population arabe le « Lion », le grand émir des armées mais il mourut quelques semaines après ses succès militaires et politiques le jour de l’an 22 Joumada II 564 AH / 1169.
A partir de ce moment là le sultan fatimide al Aâded resta fidèle au pacte avec la Syrie et déterminé dans la lutte contre les Croisés. Il nomma à la place de Shirkuh décédé un jeune nommé Salah al-Din, comme premier ministre sans tenir compte de l’opposition des princes, des dignitaires et des courtisans du régime. Salah al-Din était l’étoile brillante dans le ciel arabe et de la politique arabe.
Stratégie de libération
Cette étude n’a pas pour but de présenter la biographie de Saladin, mais de montrer sa politique et sa stratégie militaire dans la volonté de libérer Jérusalem des Croisés (Al franj : les Francs). Saladin a commencé la consolidation de son pouvoir politique et de ses prérogatives de premier ministre en Égypte, les yeux ouverts sur le front de lutte anti Croisés, au Caire, d’une part, et sur l’évolution de Nur al-Din Mahmoud, à Damas, dont il reconnaissait la souveraineté et la légitimité politique sur le monde arabe dans l’attente de l’apport que chacun pourrait faire envers l’autre pour la grande cause arabe : libérer Jérusalem.
A l’intérieur Saladin était confronté à un problème épinieux : l’armée. L’armée avait deux problèmes majeures qui rendaient l’Egypte instable et vulnérable. D’une part elle pratique depuis trop longtemps la culture du complot et des contre complots dans les luttes intestines du palais. D’autre part elle n’était pas loyale envers le Sultan fatimide, elle pouvait le trahir, le détrôner ou se ranger du côté de ses ennemis par culture du complot ou par absence de conscience nationale.
L’occasion pour la destruction de l’armée fatimide que cherchait à Salah al-Din s’est présenté d’elle même. Dans le palais du sultan fatimide un eunuque a fait circuler une pétition inspirée par les Croisés dans laquelle il se réclame comme « l’essence et la légitimité du pouvoir sur le palais ». L’enquête menée par Salah Eddine a prouvé la collaboration avec l’ennemi et l’implication de certains chefs militaires dans un complot visant à le renverser. Salah Eddine a fait exécuter les comploteurs pour le motif de conspiration avec les Croisés à envahir l’Égypte et à éliminer Salah Eddine . Dans la foulée les proches de Salah Eddine ont maitrisé le corps de l’infanterie constitué par les soldats soudanais dans l’armée fatimide armée. Ce fut un terrible massacre qui a duré deux journées entièrement dans le nettoyage de l’armée (11).
Cet incident donna à Salah Eddine une légitimité populaire et un plus grand pouvoir politique et militaire au détriment non seulement des dignitaires mais au détriment du sultan lui même. Salah Eddine eut la maîtrise totale sur les affaires intérieures lorsqu’il fut nommé « Baha’eddin Qracoc Asadi superviseur des affaires de la gouvernance du royaume « au lieu de l’ancien titre » chargé de confiance du Khalife ». Il s’attela à reconstruire les fondations de la nouvelle armée qui remplaça de droit et de fait l’armée fatimide traditionnelle. Sa relation à Nour Eddine en Syrie est demeurée au point mort entre le doute et la certitude.
L’attention de Salah Eddine était au fait des risques posés par la présence des Croisés dans la région arabe, dans le processus d’alliance militaire conjoint mené par les croisés du roi « Amuri premier » avec les dirigeants de l’empereur byzantin « Comninos Manuel » (1143 – 1180). Son attention fut aiguisée en l’an 565 AH / 1169 lors du lancement de l’attaque de la marine de la coalition franco byzantine contre Damiette, qui était le principal port égyptien sur la mer Méditerranée.
Au mois de Safar de l’année 565 AH / 1169 , la coalition franco byzantine assiégea, Damiette avec une flotte militaire de deux cents navires. Le siège fut levé après cinquante jours sans donner des résultats positifs pour les Croisés. La résistance de la ville non seulement fut héroïque et violente mais elle a révélé l’hostilité sous-jacente entre les Byzantins et les Francs. En levant le siège les Francs ont sabordé leurs navires de matériels et ont laissé la flotte byzantine subir de lourdes pertes en hommes et en navires avant qu’ils ne se retirent pour revenir à leur (12).
La débâcle de la coalition franco byzantine a augmenté le prestige et le pouvoir de Salah Eddine. Cette bataille défensive victorieuse marquait un bon début pour une série d’actes politiques et militaires prises par Salah Eddine pour former une stratégie globale et assidue pour la libération de Jérusalem …
L’année suivante, 566 AH / 1170 Salah Eddine lance sa première et véritable offensive contre les Croisés. Il libère et récupère Gaza. Il attaque et provoque des dégâts dans les rangs ennemis à Ashkelon. Au début du printemps de la même année il attaqua les Croisé dans la mer Rouge au Port de l’actuelle Aqaba. Il faut savoir qu’il transporta sa flotte en pièces détachées et à dos de chameaux pour les remonter avant la marée haute et ainsi interdire à la flotte des Croisés l’accès à la mer rouge (13).
Ainsi, Salah Eddine pris le contrôle du commerce maritime des produits précieux en provenance de l’océan Indien et s’assura la sécurité militaire dans la mer Rouge.
La stratégie de Salah Eddine pour libérer Jérusalem commençait à prendre forme dans ses aspects politiques, militaires et économiques. Toutes ses actions étaient concertées, progressives et à visée globale.
L’influence politique de Salah Eddine
Au Caire, Salah Eddine a commencé par renforcer son influence politique puis il a usé de son pouvoir politique pour prendre les mesures nécessaires pour prendre le contrôole de l’armée, de l’épurer et de la moderniser. Toutes ces mesures politiques et militaires l’ont amené à détruire le système économique féodal des castes du régime fatimide en Égypte. Sur le plan géo stratégique il a remplacé dans les postes névralgiques de l’état les seigneurs de guerre et les féodaux de l’Egypte fatimide par par les princes qui sont venus avec lui de Syrie.
Toutefois, Salah Eddine ne s’est pas empressé de mettre fin ou d’annoncer la fin du régime fatimide. Il a attendu patiemment le temps le plus propice. ce moment est arrivé, le premier vendredi du mois de Muharram de l’année 567 AH / 1171, le jour de l’agonie du dernier Khalife fatimide. Il a ordonné que l’oraison et le sermon du vendredi ne mentionnent plus le nom du Calife fâtimide, qui était alors malade et cloué au lit, mais le nom du Calife `abbâside. Cela signifiait en fait la chute de la dynastie fâtimide et l’avènement d’une nouvelle ère. La prise du pouvoir était symbolique. Le Calife fatimide décéda onze jours plus tard (14).
Ainsi, l’arène nationale est entièrement libre devant Salah Eddine. La relation tendue et le conflit latent avec Nour Eddine Mahmoud émergent à la surface. Mais sa priorité était la politique des complots et des troubles fomentés par le roi des Croisés, Amaury qu’il lui fallait traiter avec prudence car le monde musulman n’était pas encore suffisamment fort et unifié pour mener une guerre de front contre les Croisés. Amaury avec l’age et la maladie restait attiré par le mirage de l’Égypte, mais cette fois, il préférait ne pas suivre la voie de la guerre, mais celle de la division des arabes, de la gestion des crises entre musulmans. Maître en intrigues il a comploté avec le « Sultanat du Yémen» et les vestiges des forces fidèles aux Fatimides en Egypte pour affaiblir Salah Eddine au Caire. Toutes les intrigues des Croisés n’ont pas réussi a entamé la stratégie patiente et victorieuse de Salah Eddine.
Salah Eddine victorieux contre les comploteurs du Yémen qui furent crucifiés avec leur chef devint une hantise pour Amoury qui resta pétrifié devant les défaites de ses alliés, de ses comploteurs et de la flotte qu’il a financé et équipé pour soutenir le complot du Yémen et la diversion à Alexandrie contre Saladin (15). La popularité et le pouvoir de Salah Eddine ne faisait que s’accroître.
La mort de Nur al-Din Mahmoud, le 11 Chaoual, l’année 569 AH / 15 Mai 1174 fut la réponse du destin comme solution au problème de la relation critique entre les deux hommes. Le destin se manifesta encore dans le décès du roi des Croisés Amoury. SSalah Eddine venait d’être débarrassé en même temps d’un adversaire politique redoutable et d’un ennemi militaire plus inquiétant.
Salah Eddine se trouvait par le choix du destin face à l’héritier « Amoury » un garçon de dix ans d’âge et atteint de la lèpre, Baudouin, et de l’autre côté, face à l’héritier de Nour Eddine Mahmoud un autre enfant, Ismail, incapable de gouverner. Il ne pouvait y avoir une opportunité plus favorables pour conduire Salah Eddine sur la voie de la réalisation de son objectif: Jérusalem.
La dégradation des différends politiques au sein de l’entité des Croisades ne pouvait être ni atténuée ni éliminée par le recours à une alliance au sein du monde musulman, forte et capable de donner un souffle nouveau aux Croisés contre Salah Eddine. Les facteurs de division sont encore présents mais à ce moment précis des croisades il n’y avait pas un contemporain arabe ou musulman des croisades capables par sa force militaire ou par sa représentativité politique et populaire à être un allié crédible contre Salah Eddine. L’Europe divisée et épuisée ne pouvait plus continuer d’envoyer l’aide nécessaire aux Croisés francs.
Dans ces conditions il ne restait à Salah Eddine que prouver qu’il est l’homme de cette étape, et de tirer profit du vent favorable pour mener un Jihad de grande envergure contre les Croisés à la fois comme objectif de libération de Jérusalem et comme voie de reconstruction de l’unité et de la puissance de l’état musulman disloqué et affaibli.
Alors que les princes qui se sont emparés des pays musulmans sont encore plongés dans dans les litiges autour d’intérêts mesquins et de préoccupations minables tout en luttant entre eux sur qui pourrait gagner la faveur d’être le tuteur du petit Prince Ismail Saleh bin Nur al-Din Mahmoud (16), Salah Eddine n’est pas rentré dans leur jeu. Il a agit avec une remarquable intelligence; En l’an 570 AH / 1174, est venu à Hama (qui a été jointe à son État depuis une courte période) pour accueillir des émissaires du calife abbasside accompagné d’une délégation honorifique portant drapeaux noirs (l’emblème de la dynastie abbasside), lui présentant la lettre signée par le Calife, le nommant Sultan de l’Égypte, sultan de la Syrie ainsi que des autres sultanats (17).
De la libération et de la reconstruction
Son habileté politique et son intelligence de manœuvre l’ont placé de fait et de droit comme légitime souverain alors que les comploteurs se sont trouvés faisant figure de violeurs de la loi. La libération de Jérusalem passait par l’unité politique et l’unité de commandement militaire et pour cela Salah Eddine a axé sa stratégie à réaliser la première partie de son projet : l’unification du monde arabe en récupérant sous son commandement politique et militaire Damas, Homs et Hama. Ce projet réalisé il s’est empressé de se rendre à Alep qui demande l’aide de « Raymond III, » le gouverneur de Tripoli. Il a barré la route aux troupe des Croisés leur faisant marche retour après les avoir ventilé aux quatre coins de la terre par le Jihad (18). Et l’année suivante 571 AH / 1176, Salah al-Din est retourné pour imposer un embargo sur Alep, sans résultat.
Dans le camp des Croisés rien ne semble arrêter la détérioration continue des conditions morales et des divergences politiques. Il n’a y avait aucun espoir que les problèmes internes des Croisés puisse trouver solution par la tutelle de Raymond III comte de Tripoli sur le trône occupé par un roi malade. La tutelle du roi malade ou l’intronisation d’un nouveau roi ne trouvaient ni consensus ni compromis au sein des Croisés. A ces problèmes de règne s’ajoutait le problème des colons croisés en terres arabes qui ne trouvaient plus écho ou préoccupation prioritaire en Europe confrontée à d’autres problèmes internes.
L’aide aux Coalisées ne pouvait pas venir des byzantins car L’empereur byzantin, Manuel Comninos se trouve lui-même en position de faiblesse devant l’empire « Turcs Seldjoukide. Il est dans l’incapacité de négocier ou de manœuvrer face au sultan seldjoukid Arslan II, qui lui infligea une catastrophique défaite à la bataille de Myriocephalon en 1176, après avoir brisé les lignes défensives de l’armée byzantine, cette armée construite par la famille impériale » Comninos » sur plusieurs générations (19).
Salah Eddine a construit un service de renseignement efficace et compétent. Il connaissait le niveau de crise morale, politique et militaire des Coalisés. Sur les renseignements de ses agents il a lancé une attaque sur les Croisés dans la région du Sahel dans les territoires palestiniens au moins de Jamadi premier l’an 573 AH / 1177, et fut la seule fois que Salah Eddine pécha par excès de confiance en soi et par un relâchement de l’armée dont les troupes ont été autorisés à être moins en deçà des des règles établies par Salah Eddine. Le résultat ne se fit pas attendre : son armée connut la pire et la plus lourde défaite de son histoire. Mais globalement cette défaite n’est pas déterminante pour changer le rapport des forces militaires et l’équilibre des pouvoirs politiques dans la région qui devenaient de plus en plus en sa faveur(20).
Salah Eddine , a passé les années suivantes au sein de l’armée qui menaient des escarmouches mineures dans les batailles contre les Croisés et contre les princes Alzenkyines concurrents dans l’orient arabe, à la fois en Syrie et en Irak. Il a ouvert deux fronts de luttes en même temps mais sa stratégie n’a pas changé : il avait deux axes de combat : l’un sur la consolidation du front arabe et l’autre sur la préparation à la guerre décisive contre les Franques. Ces deux axes sont indissociables, ils concourent ensemble à la libération de Jérusalem.
En l’an 578 AH / 1182, Salah Eddine à la tête de son armée est sortie d’Égypte allant vers la Syrie, l’Égypte ne pouvant plus être menacée par les Croisés. Les années suivantes ont été cruciales dans la préparation de la lutte contre les Croisés. Salah Eddine a consacré son temps a organiser la résistance contre l’occupant, à mener des batailles contre ses postes et à lutter sur le font intérieur à unifier le rang des musulmans sous une seule bannière loin des convoitises des princes et des opportunistes.
Dans le camp des Croisés, les conditions vont de mal en pire, la peste fait rage, les divergences politiques s’accentuent, l’incapacité de la chrétienté à trouver une solution à l’enlisement au moyen orient et la disparition de l’allié stratégique des croisés le roi byzantin Manuel Comninos mort en Septembre 1180. L’empire byzantin a perdu de sa force et de son influence au moyen-orient (21).
la guerre psychologique
Salah Eddine a su tirer profit des circonstances pour se faire conduire vers son objectif stratégique. Contre les Croisés il a utilisé cet étonnant mélange de diplomatie, de propagande, de guerre psychologique et de confrontation militaires en transformant en sa faveur le rapport de forces. C’est la même stratégie qu’il va utiliser contre Ses rivaux arabes les princes Alzenkyines.
Il conclue avec les Croisés une trêve en l’an 1180. Mais la faiblesse du roi Baldouin IV à cause de sa maladie et à cause de la convoitise et du bellicisme du prince de Kerak Reynald de Chatillon qui ne comprenait pas l’avantage réciproque de la trêve allaient pousser les événements à leur paroxysme ultime (22). L’année 578 AH / 1182, fut l’année de l’affrontement décisif dans l’histoire de l’Islam face aux Croisades.
A ce moment précis de l’histoire, l’État de Salah Eddine comprend presque l’ensemble de la Syrie, de l’ Égypte et de l’ Irak, à l’exception des provinces d’Alep et de Mossoul. Pour Salah Eddine inclure ces deux sultanats dans l’État unifié était une priorité avant de livrer la bataille décisive pour ne pas prêter flanc à des coalitions comme par le passé. Cependant, ses tentatives pour saisir par la force Alep n’ont pas abouti (23).
Dans le même temps, Reynald de chatillon a lancé une attaque contre la ville portuaire Ayila l’automne de cette même année, ensuite il a brûlé plusieurs navires des opérateurs musulmans dans la mer Rouge, et a envoyé de nombreuses troupes croisées qui commençaient à s’approcher de la ville sainte Medina. La flotte militaire égyptienne mit fin à l’expédition des Croisés et libéra les soldats musulmans et leurs familles mis en esclavage par les troupes croisées qui avait débarqué sur la terre du Hijaz. Le Prince Hassam Eddine loulou (la perle de l’islam) qui commandait la flotte égyptienne, exécuta deux croisés sur le port libéré et le reste des prisonniers fut exécuté à leur retour au Caire (24).
Cette rupture de la trêve par Chatillon et la colère des masses musulmanes devant la tentative d’expédition contre les lieux saints et la victoire remportée par la flotte égyptienne donna à Salah Eddine al Ayoubi davantage de conviction pour unifier les rangs des musulmans et restaurer l’unité territoriale et politique de la nation musulmane. Le double danger des Croisés et de la division des musulmans s’est encore accentuée même s’il n’a jamais quitté l’esprit de Saladin alors qu’il n’était qu’un simple soldat dans l’infanterie de Shirkuh en Egypte (25 ).
De l’avis du professeur David Jackson, le sultan Salah Eddine faisait preuve d’une grande intelligence sur le plan de l’analyse et de la pratique politique, de l’ingéniosité dans la gestion des affaires de l’État, et dans l’art raffiné de la préparation du terrain politique et des mesures diplomatiques avant de prendre toute action militaire (26).
En tout état de cause, l’année 579 AH / 1184 les eforts de Salah Eddine furent sanctionnés par l’allégeance de la province d’Alep dans le cadre de la Convention sur la paix. Le renforcement politique du Sultan Salah Eddine est tel que l’historien Stephen Ransiman déclare qu’au cours des deux siècles précédents, l’histoire de la région n’a jamais vu un état arabe aussi fort et unifié comme celui de Saladin (27).
Cette année, il déploya des troupes de Damas vers la forteresse imprenable de Karak fief de Chatillon le haineux. Il assiège le fort sans pouvoir s’en emparer(28). On pense que Salah Eddine avait voulu par cette sortie provoquer juste quelques escarmouches pour montrer sa puissance militaire à des fins politiques et de propagande dans le contexte de la guerre psychologique qu’il avait décidé depuis longtemps dans sa campagne de déstabilisation des Croisés dans l’attente de l’opportunité de mener la bataille décisive pour libérer Jérusalem.
Dans la stratégie de Salah Eddine il n’est pas envisageable de mener une guerre totale contre les Croisés tant que l’émirat de Mossoul continuait de constituer une menace pour lui. Il avait la conviction que l’unité des forces politiques et militaires dans la région arabe est nécessaire, elle est la condition essentielle pour garantir la victoire en cas de guerre totale contre les Croisés. Il savait aussi par son longue expérience de combat et de gestion des affaires de la région que les forces des croisés allaient vers l’affaiblissement et qu’il fallait les harceler sans répit pour accélérer leur affaiblissement et donner à ses troupes plus d’expériences militaires avant l’heure H. Son intelligence était de rester lucide et de construire la victoire d’une manière décisive et pour cala il fallait ne pas perdre l’objectif final, la libération de Jérusalem , et les objectifs intermédiaires, accroître la vulnérabilité des croisés d’une part et parvenir à l’unité arabe politique, militaire d’autre part, avant la confrontation finale.
le siège de Kerak
Salah Eddine connaissant le caractère belliqueux et irrespectueux des traités et conventions de Chatillon et l’importance de la forteresse de Kerak dans le dispositif militaire, économique et commercial concentra ses efforts au harcèlement de Kerak. Il assurait ainsi la sécurité des convois routiers entre l’Égypte et la Syrie et fissurait la défense de son ennemi par l’usure.
En l’an 579 AH / 1183, le Sultan Salah Eddine recevant des renforts d’Égypte est passé du siège à l’assaut de Kerak la soumettant sous un déluge de tirs de catapultes et de flèches. Les armées musulmanes ont fait battre en retraite à l’intérieur de la forteresse le prince de Chatillon et son armée sortis à la rencontre des troupes de Salah Eddine. Chatillon n’a sauvé sa vie que dans la fuite abandonnant une partie de ses troupes à leur sort.
L’assaut final a été retardé à cause de la célébration du mariage de deux princes. La mère de la princesse a demandé à Salah Eddine de ne pas gâcher leurs fêtes et lui a envoyé des mets et des gâteaux. Il agréa la demande la mère et tint promesse de ne pas bombarder la tour où se déroulait la cérémonie montrant une fois de plus son esprit chevaleresque et son humanité. Il a donc maintenu le siège qu’il a été contraint de lever pour aller à la rencontre des renforts des croisés venant de Palestine. Il mit en déroute les armées croisées à Naplouse et Jénine, libérant déjà une partie des territoires palestiniens (29) … Il est ensuite retourné à Damas. Si nous avons décidé de parler de cet aspect militaire en dépit de l’absence de victoires significatives, c’est dans le but de clarifier l’intérêt de Salah Eddine des questions tactiques et stratégiques qui pourraient affecter la réalisation de ses objectifs suprêmes. Dans ces objectifs la forteresse de Karak est une grave menace qu’il faut contenir et en même temps il faut sécuriser le transport des convois commerciaux et des forces militaires entre l’Egypte et la Syrie.
La conjugaison du politique, du militaire et de l’économique dans une vision stratégique claire et une prise d’initiative toujours en avance sur l’ennemi apporte ses fruits et donne à Salah Eddine davantage de force politique : Baldouin IV » le roi croisé de Jérusalem, en 1185, contraint les Croisés à la signature d’un traité de paix avec Saladin pour un mandat de quatre ans. Ce temps était suffisant pour Salah Eddine de parachever l’oeuve d’unification des Arabes. Il avait donc le temps et la liberté d’action militaire et de manœuvre politique contre l’émirat de Mossoul. Le gouverneur de Mossoul a répondu, sous la pression sans relâche de Salah Eddine, de signer tenir un traité reconnaissant l’extension du pouvoir du Sultan Salah Eddine sur la province de Mossoul.
L’interprétation de ce traité sur le plan militaire s’est soldé par l’accroissement de la force militaire de Salah Eddine de six mille cavaliers de l’émirat de Mossoul. Pour l’époque c’était une force militaire conséquente (30). Au niveau stratégique le rapport des forces a résolument changé en faveur des musulmans qui venaient enfin de réaliser la cohésion sociale et l’unité politique et militaire. Salah Eddine venait de réaliser une partie de son rêve et concrétiser un objectif principal: la réalisation de l’unité politique et militaire.
Ensuite est venu l’an 581 AH / 1185 le point culminant du génie stratégique de Salah Eddine qui a utilisé avec art et efficacité la combinaison de la force militaire, de la manoeuvre politique, de la guerre psychologique, et de la bonne planification de tous ses plans et de ses mouvements contre l’ennemi.
Il n’est pas inutile de souligner quelques faits marquants. Il a été le Sultan qui a reconstruit la flotte égyptienne faisant d’elle une marine militaire crainte dans la mer Rouge et la Méditerranée. Il a mené une action diplomatique isolant les Croisés et les empêchant de construire des alliances tant avec les arabes qu’avec les européens. Ainsi il a persuadé les villes italiennes de tirer profit économique en faisant un transfert direct de leur centres commerciaux sur le sol égyptien en leur garantissant la paix et la sécurité. Il a ouvert une passerelle diplomatique avec l’empire byzantin qui a permis la signature d’un accord avec l’empereur byzantin « Ondronicos » le libérant des intentions de l’Europe de l’Ouest dont la culture des Croisades jetaient le doute, la méfiance et la suspicion sur toute relation avec le monde arabe et musulman (31).
Les signes de la guerre
L’année 582 AH / 1186 annonce les signes de la guerre et les signes de la défaite des croisés: les Croisés se sont divisés divisés en deux groupes après la mort de leur roi Baudouin IV « , et son successeur», Baudouin V » un enfant sous tutelle, qui décédera l’été de la même année.
Intelligente et capable de manœuvre, Izabela la fille du roi Amauri I est arrivée à surmonter les rivalités au sein des Croisés pour imposer son époux Guy de Lusignan roi du royaume des Croisés de Jérusalem. Le premier camp des croisés s’articulait autour de la reine, Isabelle, de son mari, qui était un modèle dans le genre de combiner la beauté des traits physique et la laideur du comportement moral et des faucons pour qui la guerre et la violence sont les seules méthodes à avoir envers avec les musulmans. Le second camp des croisés représentait été un certain nombre de princes dont Raymond III Comte de Tripoli, qui étaient d’avis qu’il vaut mieux chercher l’apaisement avec les musulmans, tant que les conditions ne permettent pas de combats décisifs en leur faveur(32).
Voila en gros le panorama politique dans la région arabe à l’approche de la libération de Jérusalem et s’inscrivant dans une lutte longue et acharnée entre les deux parties du conflit. C’est dans cette configuration politique et militaire que Renaud de Chatillon entre de nouveau en scène pour remettre en cause le traité de paix entre Salah Eddine et les Croisés dans des conditions défavorables aux coalisés dont une partie des troupes souffraient de maladies, de faim et de nostalgie. Agissant de concert avec les faucons Renaud de Chatillon a quitté la forteresse de Kerak pour attaiquer, en violation des accord signés, des convois commerciaux musulmans, assassinant les uns et faisant captifs les autres. Il a donné l’occasion à Salah Eddine d’ouvrir de nouveau les hostilités militaires contre les Croisés.
De l’avis de l’historien allemand Hans Meyer « Salahaddin » ne pouvait pas se taire sur les menaces de Chatillon sur la sécurité de la route commerciale entre l’Égypte et l’Orient et du traffic maritime de la mer Rouge et de l’Océan Indien (33). A mon avis, cette attaque était attendue par Salah Eddine et elle lui a donné prétexte de se délier de son pacte et de lancer une guerre décisive contre les Croisés maintenant qu’il a unifié le monde arabe et achevé la préparation des plans stratégiques de la guerre.
Les Croisés furent embarrassés par les nouvelles alarmantes qui leur annoncent les préparatifs militaires des musulmans en vue de les attaquer. Ils étaient dans un désaroi tel qu’ils ont failli aller au dela du clivage politique à la guerre civilele (34). Finalement le sentiment général du dnger imminent mit fin aux divergences et souda les Coalisés en un bloc uni pour faire face aux musulmans avec vigueur et détermination. Près de la ville de Nazareth en Palestine les Franques parviennent à lever la plus grande armée de l’histoire des Croisades. Ils ont mobilisé sur pied de guerre environ dix-huit mille soldats d’infanterie et de cavalerie dont mille deux cent équipés d’armement lourds et quatre mille chevaliers, et cette avec son nombre et son équipement est pour l’époque quelque chose de colossale.
La force de l’armée franque ne pouvait cacher l’état psychologique de ses soldats ramassés à travers toutes les colonies sous leur domination : la panique et le manque de préparation.
Les forces du Sultan, Nasser Salah Eddine al Ayoubi étaient constituées de trois corps d’armée, un corps syrien dont il était lui-même le commandant en chef, le corps des forces égyptiennes et le corps des forces irakiennes. Les corps d’armées égyptiennes et irakiennes étaient réparties en brigades chacune sous le commandement des princes venus d’Égypte et d’Irak et sous le commandement des propres frères et des propres fils de Salah Eddine.
Nous devons avouer qu’il n’existe aucune statistique pour évaluer le nombre et l’équipement des forces musulmanes. A mon avis le nombre devrait presque le même que celui des Croisés. La différence résidait dans la motivation au combat, la stratégie de combat et dans les armes et les équipements.
Au mois d’ Octobre 1187 (27 Rajab en 538 AH), Salah Eddine libère Jérusalem.
Jérusalem est un symbole
La marche épique de Salah Eddine vers la libération de Jérusalem, a commencé par des événements sanglants à l’issue desquels Jérusalem est tombé injustement aux mains de la horde des croisades au cours de la dernière année du dixième siècle de notre ère.
Jérusalem est un symbole pour les Croisades : le royaume de Jérusalem ou le royaume latin d’Orient.
Salah Eddine est un symbole de la résistance contre les croisades et du Djihad islamique contre l’agression. Il a consacré sa vie à la libération de Jérusalem, comme nous le verrons dans la Partie II de la présente étude qui va tenter d’approfondir le récit sur d’édification de la stratégie de bataille contre les croisés jusqu’à la récupération de Jérusalem et des territoires arabes occupés.
Le début des manœuvres militaires des deux côtés, se déroula comme un jeu d’échecs où chacune des parties essaye de deviner la stratégie de l’adversaire tout en déployant la sienne par l’occupation tactique du terrain et par l’utilisation des ressources disponibles de la meilleure façon possible, avec audace et intelligence.
Dans le camp des Croisés les choses semblent un peu plus compliqués car il était difficile de trouver un compromis entre la prudence du comte de Tripoli, Raymond III, et la fougue belliqueuse des Templiers .
Dans le camp des musulmans, le génie militaire de Salah Eddine va se manifester comme prolongement des manœuvres militaires et des méthodes de guerre utilisés dans la bataille de Hattin et les batailles connexes qui ont suivi cette bataille et qui toutes ont été menées dans une seule visée : récupérer Jérusalem et la libération de la mosquée Al-Aqsa.
Dans la période antérieure à la bataille de Hattin, Salah Eddine a consacré environ treize mois dans la lutte contre les croisés par des combats intermittents, alors qu’il a passé trente-trois mois, depuis l’automne de l’an 570 AH / 1174, dans des combats sporadiques contre les arabes, afin de construire un front uni arabe. Ce n’est qu’en 581 AH / 1186, qu’il parvint à un traité avec l’émir de Mossoul qui parachève la souveraineté totale de Salah Eddine sur le monde arabe et lui donne les forces militaires manquantes pour envisager sérieusement une bataille décisive contre les Croisés (36).
On peut d’ores et déjà sortir avec la conclusion que le Sultan était pleinement conscient que la construction d’un Front uni est très importante dans son dispositif de combat contre les Croisés. Dès qu’il a réalisé l’unité de front arabe il s’est aussitôt déployé sur la seconde phase de sa stratégie à long terme murement réfléchie, patiemment et intelligemment mise en place pour la libération de Jérusalem.
David Jackson a écrit : … Je crois que l’analyse des motivations religieuses et de sa dévotion mérite d’être évaluée avec soin pour voir qu’en dépit de tout, son attachement à son idéal religieux a été irréversible, en dépit de l’existence des différents points de vue des autres. Je reste persuadé que la motivation première qui a guidé toute la vie et toute l’ouvre de Salah Eddine était le Jihad jusqu’à la libération totale de Jérusalem qui passe aux yeux de Salah Eddine nécessairement par la destruction de la puissance militaire du Royaume des croisades. Le Jihad était pour lui la condition nécessaire pour atteindre l’objectif de libérer Jérusalem.
On a essayé de montrer la lutte de Salah Eddine contre les princes rivaux comme une lutte d’intérêts et de pouvoir pour son clan et sa famille mais cela ne tient pas à l’analyse de ses biographies. J’ai l’intime conviction que sa vie a été consacrée à l’objectif qu’il avait choisi, la libération de Jérusalem, et toutes ses luttes internes se focalisaient sur la réalisation de cet objectif (37).
Face à Salah Eddine on peut dire que la stratégie des Croisés a constaté essentiellement à éviter l’affrontement avec les musulmans autant que possible en se focalisant sur une planification de guerre purement défensive (38). Depuis la création du royaume des Croisés, les Franques ont toujours consacré leurs efforts à la fragmentation des arabes et à l’évitement d’une confrontation qui pouvait donner une rapide victoire aux armées musulmanes.
Raymond III était persuadé que si l’armée des Croisés livrait bataille dans la chaleur de l’été elle n’aurait pas la haute main dans la lutte, et a tenté de persuader le roi croisé, Guy de Lusignan, de ne pas prendre l’initiative de livrer bataille et de sa cantonner à la défensive. Mais le chef des chevaliers Renaud de Châtillon accuse Raymond de lâcheté et convainc les Croisés de lancer assaut contre les musulmans et battre l’armée de Saladin.
Comme le Roi des Croisés n’avait pas l’envergure d’un chef il a finit par se ranger à l’avis de Renaud de Châtillon. Dans leur sortie à la rencontre des musulmans les Croisés ont campé dans la région de Sophoria verdoyante avec arbres et cours d’eau et Raymond insistât pour y rester sans aller plus loin dans la rencontre des musulmans préconisant une fois de plus qu’il n’était pas sage de chercher à livrer combat contre les musulmans.
À propos de Galilée
Salah Eddine n’a pas hésité à recourir à une diversion militaire pour forcer les Croisés à sortir de leur campement de Sophoria qui leur assurait la sécurité et les ressources. Au début du printemps de l’année 583 AH / 1187, il a lancé une forte attaque sur la forteresse de la Galilée où résidait la femme du comte Raymond III. Soumettant le château a des assauts qui allaient le faire tomber, Salah Eddine parvient à pousser la femme du comte, retranchée dans le château assiégé, à solliciter l’aide du roi des Croisés pour mettre fin au siège de Salah Eddine (39). La manœuvre militaire de Salah Eddine réussit : contre l’avis de RAYMOND III qui était conscient des risques de l’affrontement meurtrier avec l’armée des musulmans d’une part, et qui pensait qu’il valait mieux laisser tomber le château et payer la rançon pour libérer sa femme d’autre part, le chef de l’Ordre des Chevaliers, s’introduisit auprès du roi des Croisés et le convaincu d’aller à la rencontre de Salah Eddine pour l’empêcher de s’emparer de la Galilée.
Vendredi, 24 rabiâ 583 Hijri / 3 Juillet 1187, en pleine chaleur, l’armée des croisades quitta les jardins couverts de Sophoria pour prendre le chemin des collines nues à destination de Tibériade (40). Comme à l’habitué les forces de renseignement et de reconnaissance de l’armée de Saladin démontrèrent leur intelligence et leur compétence dans le suivi et les prévisions des manœuvres des armées des croisés. Salah Eddine était mis au courant du déplacement des armées ennemies et de l’état de leurs forces.
Et Salah Eddine redéploya son armée en lui faisant faire marche du camp de « Kfar Sabbat » au village de Hattin, qui était été riche en pâturages et en eau abondante. A hattin son armée fit jonction avec les troupes musulmanes qui revenaient de Galilée mettant fin à leur siège. La situation logistique a changé : c’est maintenant les troupes musulmanes qui sont à l’aise et au repos tandis que les troupes croisées sont en marche exposées à la chaleur et au soleil de plomb.
Dans cette situation de combat les troupes musulmanes harcelaient les flancs et les arrières des armées par des coups de main et des embuscades en s’appuyant sur la cavalerie légère. On assiste à de nouvelles techniques de combat auxquelles les armées des croisées n’étaient pas préparées : harcèlement et attaques surprises éclair.
Il était difficile voire impossible pour les armées croisées de modifier leur dispositif de combat et de déplacement pour s’adapter aux nouvelles techniques de guerre éclair utilisée par les musulmans. Maintenant leur dispositif traditionnel de blocs compacts et de rangs serrés les croisés ont péniblement souffert du harcèlement type guérilla. Devant les pertes subies et la désorganisation de leurs dispositifs, les Croisés ont été contraint d’arrêter leur déplacement et d’organiser un camp de stationnement pour tenter de repousser les attaques poursuivies tout au long d’une longue et pénible journée qui a vu des attaques violentes perpétrées par des musulmans sur les flancs et le dos de leur armée et entamant la résistance morale et physique des troupes(41).
Les Croisés ont installé leur campement sur une colline surplombant le lac de Galilée. Mais ils ne sont pas en mesure d’atteindre l’eau car des détachements musulmans leur font obstruction en s’interposant entre eux et les berges du lac.
Et pour le malheur des croisées, la soif du jour se conjugua à la fumée émise par les feux que les soldats de Salah Eddine, infiltrés dans les avants postes, allumaient dans les broussailles sèches autour du campement. Les croisés étaient en plus démoralisés par les prières et les Allah Akbar prononcés par les musulmans. Le matin, à l’aube dès l’appel à la prière des musulmans, les croisés avec un moral fortement perturbé, firent le constat qu’ils étaient encerclés de tous les côtés. Il ne leur restait que la tentative d’ouvrir une brèche par l’infanterie à destination des points d’eau mais ce fut pour eux la plus grande débâcle de l’histoire des croisades. Après d’âpres combats une partie des troupes croisées fut dispersée et une autre partie fut tuée ou capturée.
Le samedi, rabiâ 25 583 Hijri / Juillet 4, 1187, l’Armée islamique réalisa la plus grande victoire contre l’existence du royaume des croisades. Toute l’armée conduite par les Chevaliers fut décimée. Ne survécut à cette défaite que Raymond III, le comte de Tripoli, qui avaient fui pendant la bataille, avec un certain nombre d’amis. Salah Eddine a réussi à décimer une partie de l’élite des Croisés (42). Jérusalem devenait de plus en plus un objectif proche et réalisable dans la stratégie patiente et savante de Salah Eddine.
A la suite de ce combat qui fut une destruction catastrophique des forces principales des Croisés qui ont perdu des hommes et du matériel ne restaient comme résistance principale sur la route vers Jérusalem que de petites garnisons retranchées dans les forteresses, les châteaux et les villes occupées qui tombèrent les unes après les autres au main des musulmans peu de temps après la bataille de Hattin.
Plus qu’une défaite, une série de défaites
Certes, il est vrai qu’avant la bataille de Hattin les Croisés ont connu des catastrophes militaires, il est vrai aussi qu’un certain nombre de leurs dirigeants ont été tués ou faits prisonnier par les combattants musulmans, mais la bataille de Hattin est plus qu’une défaite ou une catastrophe militaire c’est l’effondrement du système idéologique, militaire, politique et psychologique des croisades.
Le plus important dans cette bataille décisive est que Salah Eddine est réconforté dans sa vision de libération de Jérusalem qui dictait de rendre les croisés vulnérables détruisant le mythe de leur invincibilité militaire et de la puissance de leur royaume. Il a été en mesure, à la tête de son armée, de détruire la plus grande armée des Croisés, et il est maintenant convaincu plus que jamais que la défaite totale des Croisés est faisable et que c’est leur défaite militaire qui mettra fin au royaume latin en Orient et réalisera la libération définitive des territoires arabes de la domination étrangère.
Il est vrai que la bataille de Hattin n’a pas mis de fait fin aux Croisades et s’il y a eu une durée plus grande à l’existence des Croisades et plus tard à la présence coloniale cela est imputable à la faiblesse politique des successeurs de Salah Eddine qui ont laissé ressurgir les anciennes rivalités politiques et s’installer de nouveau l’esprit tribal avec ses convoitises et sa vision étroite et à court terme.
Il faut souligner aussi que les Croisés ont perdu par la suite de leur vitalité et n’ont tien réalisé de grand ou de spectaculaire se contentant de gérer leur royaume que Salah Eddine a laminé et fortement réduit.
Le plus grand fait, du côté musulman, de la bataille de Hattin, est la participation, pour la première fois depuis des siècles, au combat ensemble, sur un même front et contre un seul et même ennemi, l’ensemble des forces officielles arabes venant de Syrie, d’Irak, d’Egypte et même des bénévoles venant du Maghreb. Elle donne à l’histoire le repère véritable et la stratégie authentique de libération des terres occupées : un front uni dans l’action politique et militaire. Ce front n’était pas le résultat d’une improvisation ou d’un accident de l’histoire mais l’effort inlassable, permanent et continu d’Imad Eddin Zinced, de Noor Eddin Mahmud et puis de Salah Eddine Ayouby. La victoire de Hattin contre le colonialisme des Croisades est le point culminant et logique des efforts de la construction du Front uni de résistance politique et militaire.
De ces considérations découle l’importance historique de la bataille de Hattin. Elle reste une épine au gout amer et cruel dans toute l’histoire des Croisades et de l’Europe catholique …
Lorsque le temps d’apaisa et la poussière de la bataille se dispersa, le roi des croisés Guy de Lusignan accompagné de Renaud de Chatillon et de hauts dirigeants furent amenés captifs dans la tente où les attendaient Salah Eddine. Le chroniqueur musulman Îmad al-Esfahani raconte comment le Sultan Salah gronda Renaud de Chatillon et lui reprocha ses actions belliqueuses et son odieux manque de respect pour les pactes et les conventions. Jusqu’à la fin Renaud de Chatillon se montra arrogant, menteur et perfide allant jusqu’à affirmer que la faute incombait aux rois des Croisés. Salah Eddine a tué le prince transgresseur comme accomplissement d’un vœu qu’il avait fait à lui-même lorsqu’il a pris conscience des horreurs commises contre les musulmans à cause des agissements et des intrigues de Renaud de Chatillon.
A la vue de la décapitation du prince Renaud de Chatillon le Roi des Croisés fut pris d’une crise d’épilepsie qui ne s’arrêta que lorsque Salah Eddine le réconforta et lui donna le serment qu’il était sous sa protection. Il donna l’ordre de décapiter tous les Templiers considérés comme responsables des massacres commises contre les populations musulmanes, à l’exception de leur commandant en chef à qui il accorda la vie (43).
Après la victoire de la bataille de Hattin les forces de Saladin avancent en douceur sans précipitation faisant tomber les uns après les autres cinquante-deux villes, châteaux et forteresses des Croisés.
Les places fortes des croisés tombaient facilement car d’une part elles étaient dans un rapport de force défavorable et d’autre part ses occupants avaient la garantie de la vie sauve et de la sécurité s’ils se rendaient sans opposer résistance. Salah Eddine avaient la réputation de ne jamais manquer à ses promesses ni à ses engagements.
Les armées de Saladin sont parvenus jusqu’à Acre (Akka en Palestine), qui était le plus important port des Croisés sur la Méditerranée. C’est un port militaire bien protégé avec des forteresse presque invulnérables et qui s’est préparé à l’arrivée des armés musulmanes qui l’ont attaqué le premier jeudi du mois de Joumada I AH 583 / 1187. La population croisée d’Acre, en quête de sécurité, a demandé de négocier avec Salah Eddine qui leur a donné le choix de rester ou de partir loin de la zone de combat. Ayant fait le choix de partir il s’engagea à leur laisser la vie sauve et à leur laisser leurs richesses qu’ils pouvaient transporter avec eux comme serment de Salah Eddine inviolable et sacré.
Comme ils s’imaginaient qu’après la prise de la ville ils allaient tous être tués ainsi que leurs femmes et leurs enfants il décidèrent pour la plupart d’abandonner la ville à son sort…( 45). L’attaque contre la ville permis la libération des prisonniers musulmans à Acre (Akka) dont le nombre dépassait quatre mille(46). Acre remis les clés de la ville à Salah Eddine au cours du mois de Joumada I 583 AH / 10 Juillet 1187. A partir d’Acre Salah Eddine récupéra en quelques mois Jaffa, Nazareth, Sforep, kissaria, Naplouse, et Tibnine, Sidon, Beyrouth, Byblos, Ashkelon, Gaza, Toron, Aldarom (à proximité du territoire égyptien). Le but était d’empêcher le débarquement de renforts venus d’Europe. Il pouvait maintenant se mettre en marche sur Jérusalem à la fin de Joumada II 583 AH / Septembre 1187 (47).
Récupération d’Ashkelon
Ashkelon est la plus importante des forteresses que Salah Eddine a fixé comme objectif à reconquérir avant de se diriger sur Jérusalem. Ashkelon a été un grand enjeu militaire et stratégique tant pour les croisés que pour les musulmans : c’est une base à la fois navale et terrestre dont la maîtrise permettait de lancer des expéditions redoutables tant navales que terrestres le sol peuvent être avancées pour ceux qui possédaient eux pour lancer des attaques efficaces contre l’ennemi au sol ou sur mer. Cette base est resté 35 ans sous la domination des croisés avant d’être libérée par Salah Eddine qui a ordonné la destruction de ses murailles et de ses forteresses pour qu’elle ne puisse plus servir de base ennemi dans le cas où elle serait reprise par l’ennemi dans le futur.
Le Sultan met son armée, victorieuse, en marche sur Jérusalem pour la faire tomber par l’épée (48). Sans doute il eut l’idée et le désir de venger le sang des musulmans massacrés par les croisés lors de la Première Croisade en Juillet 1099.
A ce moment là, dans la marche sur Jérusalem, Al-Nasser Salah Eddine Yusuf Ayouby, avait sous son commandement toutes les armées arabes qui avaient combattu sur tous les fronts et toutes les villes et forteresses le long de la côte syrienne et palestinienne où se trouvait la forte présence des coalisés. Il imposa l’embargo totale contre la ville sainte, le dimanche, le 15 Rajab, 583 AH / Septembre 1187 ….
Le dernier et court chapitre de l’histoire de la libération de Jérusalem, doit toujours être vu comme l’aboutissement d’un long processus historique et le résultat d’une complexe maturation politique et militaire et non un simple fait d’armes épique. Le siège de la sainte ville a duré seulement vingt jours, mais le conflit a été l’histoire de longs et pénibles chapitres qui s’est étalée sur quatre-vingt-huit ans de luttes sur plusieurs générations depuis que la ville tomba aux mains des Franques Croisés la dernière année du dixième siècle jusqu’à sa libération par les musulmans le 27 du mois de Rajab de l’année 583 AH / II d’Octobre 1187.
La scène finale a été, comme une ironie du sort, plein de contrastes, plein de panoramas impressionnants. Elle demeure comme contradiction générale avec la scène brutale et cruelle qui a eu lieu quatre-vingt-huit ans auparavant. Elle demeure un rapport de confrontation entre le fanatisme agresseur et la culture d’une civilisation qui défend son existence et ses valeurs, entre l’arrogance impitoyable du colonisateur et l’éthique de la résistance et entre la barbarie du dominateur et la fierté et la noblesse du triomphe de la libération.
Enfin l’assaut final contre la sainte ville fut donné et les catapultes des armées musulmanes ciblèrent les murailles et les tours fortes par un pilonnage intensif de lourdes pierres et de boulets de feu. Bien protégés derrière les murailles les croisés opposèrent une résistance farouche et obstinée sous le commandement du Prince croisé Balian de Laplaine. La résistance de la ville conjugué à la chaleur du jour contraint le Sultan Salah Eddine à déplacer son camp et à changer de site de bataille. Il se dirigea alors le 25 Rajab vers la partie nord de la ville.
Les croisés pensaient que l’Armée islamique a dû lever le siège de la ville, mais ils ont déchanté de leur optimisme lorsqu’ils vu apparaitre les forces de l’Islam sur le Mont des Oliviers, qui surplombe Jérusalem du côté de la Vallée de l’Enfer (49).
Etranges rituels
À l’intérieur de la ville, la reine Isabella Sybila prend la défense de la ville avec le concours du patriarche catholique Héraclius et du Prince Balian. Les femmes de l’aristocratie des Croisés, sous la direction d’Isabella, eurent recours à une étrange procession, un rituel inédit, dans l’espoir que le sort soit plus clément en faveurs des Croisés qui ne se faisaient plus d’illusion sur l’issue de la bataille. Les dames de l’aristocratie se sont mises à tondre les cheveux de leurs filles, puis à les déshabiller les laissant nues prendre un bain en public et en plein air sur une colline de Jérusalem (50).
Mais la ville assiégée n’est pas dans le besoin de ces rituels frivoles, mais dans des combattants, des armes et une volonté de combattre qui font défaut… Et le prince Balian proposa de remettre les clés de la ville en échange d’un pacte de paix qui garantit leur vie et leur sécurité. Mais le sultan Salah Eddine, refusa l’offre car il voulait une victoire totale par les armes pour achever définitivement la présence étrangère sur les territoires arabes et clore un chapitre de l’histoire du monde arabe : la ville devrait être libérée de la même façon qu’elle a été prise.
Sur ce sujet le chroniqueur musulman Imad al-Din al-Asfahani raconte : » Le Prince des croisés a dit que si le Sultan n’acceptait pas l’offre d’échanger la ville contre leur sécurité, il allait donner l’ordre aux croisés de détruire la ville, y compris la mosquée Al-Aqsa et le Dôme du Rocher, et abattre toutes les femmes et les enfants vivant dans la ville « … Votre intérêt n’est pas dans notre défaite mais dans un traité de paix, vous perdrez tout si vous obtenez totale victoire. La déception vous est venue par la porte de l’espérance, le moins pire pour vous se trouve dans le traité de paix même s’il contrarie votre victoire … ». La décision finale fut prise par un conseil de guerre qui accepta la capitulation des croisés et l’arrêts des combats par les troupes musulmanes (51).
Ils devaient être heureux ce jour là les défenseurs Croisés dirigés par le Prince Balian de Laplaine. Ils étaient heureux parce qu’ils sont à la merci d’un vainqueur qui jouit de hautes qualités morales et des attributs de miséricorde et de compassion. Personne n’ignorait la vertu de la parole et des actes de Nasser Salah Eddine. Sa miséricorde et sa sagesse ainsi que celle de son conseil de guerre ont évité une effusion de sang inutile et ont confirmé une fois de plus l’humilité des musulmans dans la victoire et le primat de la raison sur le désir de vengeance. L’histoire des Croisades ne retient ni contre Salah Eddine ni contre les musulmans les atrocités qui étaient courantes dans le monde à cette époque … »(52).
En effet le Sultan était connu de ses contemporains, par son comportement humain, loyal, fidèle à ses promesses. Quand le prince Balian a proposé ses conditions de reddition Salah Eddine n’a pas hésité longtemps avant d’aller à la solution la plus charitable et la plus économie en vie humaine. Il a vaincu la rage portée dans le cœur quand les yeux voient la sainte ville à la portée de ses armes et que le souvenir est hanté par le massacre des s musulmans lors de la prise de la ville par les croisés et par les longues et cruelles souffrances des peuples arabes plongés sous le joug du colonialisme des croisés qui a duré quatre-vingt-huit ans .
Les musulmans ont accepté que soit versée une rançon pour chaque homme de dix dinars, chaque femme de cinq dinars, et chaque enfant de deux dinars (53).
Entrée victorieuse à Jérusalem
Les Musulmans entrent à Jérusalem le vingt-septième jour du mois de Rajab en 583 AH / II de Octobre 1187. Ne sont restés dans la ville que les autochtones, les arabes musulmans et les arabes chrétiens de l’Eglise orientale. Tous les croisés ont quitté sains et saufs la ville, ceux qui pouvaient payer leur rançon et ceux que Salah Eddine a accordé dérogation de ne pas payer leur rançon pour une raison ou une autre.
Le patriarche Héraclès est parti sain, sauf et libre d’emmener avec lui les reliques religieuses, l’argent et tous les objets en or et en argent ainsi que les coffres remplis d’objets précieux qui étaient dans l’église de la Résurrection, sous les yeux et la protection des soldats musulmans, sans être exposé à un vol ou une vexation de la part de la population arabe. Un pacte est sacré, inviolable, quelques soient les blessures et les humiliations subies par le passé.
Le dernier à partir fut le princpe Balian qui avait déployé toute son énergie pour maintenir la ville sous domination des croisés et qui avait fait tout son possible pour négocier la livraison de la ville contre la vie sauve de ses défendeurs croisés chevaliers, soldats et civils. Il est parti libre accompagné de son épouse et des princes et chevaliers qui étaient avec lui à Jérusalem. Ils sont partis empruntant une route sécurisée pour eux et leurs biens conformément aux garanties données par le Sultan Nasser Salah Eddine Youssouf al Ayoubi.
Pour l’époque, la reconquête de Jérusalem, reste, sur le plan humanitaire, une image singulière. La libération de Jérusalem a provoqué un rayonnement de bonheur , de liesse populaire et de ferveur religieuse dans l’ensemble du monde musulman. La nouvelle de la libération de Jérusalem attira des foules innombrables du monde musulman pour la visite de la ville sainte et la mosquée Al Aqsa (54).
L’oraison et le sermon du vendredi ont été restaurés à la mosquée Al-Aqsa, après une longue pause de presque un siècle, le quatrième vendredi du mois de Sha’ban en 583 AH. La chaire du sermon de (al minabar) qui a été réalisée depuis longtemps, depuis Nur al-Din Mahmoud, a pris sa place lors de cette célébration historique de l’oraison du premier vendredi de la libération.
L’historien Ibn Athir raconte : Salah Eddine ordonna la construction de la tribune (minabar) pour l’offrir à la mosquée Al-Aqsa le jour de la libération de Jérusalem à laquelle il se préparait et y croyait. Lorsqu’on lui dit que Nur al-Din Mahmoud avait déjà donné des instructions à des artisans d’Alep de fabriquer le Minbar en mettant toute leur ingéniosité artistique pour qu’il soit la plus belle tribune jamais réalisée dans le monde islamique. Les menuisiers syriens ont mis des années pour réaliser ce chef d’œuvre d’ébénisterie. Salah Eddine ordonna que cette chaire soit ramenée à Jérusalem pour l’inauguration de la prière du vendredi dans Jérusalem qui allait être libérée. C’est donc cette chaire qui pris sa place dans la mosquée al Aqsa.
L’imam qui a présidé à la prière était le juge Mohieddin Ibn Zaky. Il portait la tunique noire emblème de la dynastie des Abbassides et prononça des éloquents sermons et des discours plein de ferveur religieuse à cette occasion historique (56).
L’oraison et le sermon du vendredi dans Jérusalem libérée
Il s’agissait ce jour là, dans la prière, dans le sermon, dans la chaire et dans la foule des orants, des images symboliques du processus du jihad qui a duré plusieurs générations, afin de libérer Jérusalem des Croisés (57).
Salah Eddine s’est donné suffisamment de temps pour évacuer la ville de tous les Croisés, pour remettre la ville en état de fonctionner normalement sur le plan administratif, social et économique. Il a autorisé l’entrée de la ville aux populations juives. Les juifs ont été expulsées des abords de la ville par les Croisés et n’étaient pas autorisés à pénétrer dans la ville sainte durant les longues années d’occupation croisée sous le prétexte qu’ils étaient responsables des souffrances de Jésus-Christ. Pour l’histoire il faut souligner que les juifs en Palestine étaient peu nombreux par rapport aux autres villes d’Orient et que la majorité de la minorité juive en Palestine, vivaient traditionnellement en dehors de la ville de Jérusalem comme en témoignent le Benjamin Alttili et d’autres nombreuses sources historiques. Salah Eddine leur a accordé le privilège de résider dans la ville comme tous les autochtones de la région arabe.
Le Sultan ordonna la restauration du Mihrab de Omar devenu vétuste et son revêtement en marbre. Il ordonna le retrait des icônes et des images placées par les Templiers et les Chevaliers dans les maisons qu’ils avaient spoliés et dans les bâtiments et cours de la mosquée Al-Aqsa.
Le Dôme du Rocher est lavé avec de grandes quantités d’eau de rose, puis son air purifié par les meilleurs encens. Il supervisa le recrutement du personnel responsable du service de la mosquée Al-Aqsa. L’église de la Résurrection a été fermée pendant plusieurs jours, puis elle a rouvert ses portes aux fidèles chrétiens. Autorisation fut donnée aux princes des croisés de la visiter et d’y venir faire leurs prières et leur pèlerinage.
Ce bref aperçu sur le rôle historique de Saladin et sur sa stratégie pour la libération de Jérusalem, révèle une biographie d’un homme qui mérite une noble appréciation et une grande vénération à la lumière de sa réussite dans la libération de Jérusalem. Toute sa biographie témoigne qu’il a dirigé son attention tout au long de sa vie pour atteindre cet objectif, et qu’il a estimé, sans faillir un jour ou douter un instant, que le jihad est la seule façon, au niveau politique et militaire, pour parvenir à la libération des territoires occupés.
Il faut retenir que Salah Eddine a construit le projet de libération de Jérusalem sur la base préalable de la reconstruction de l’unité morale, politique et religieuse du monde musulman sous la bannière du djihad contre les Croisés. Sa biographie révèle qu’il a consacré la plus grande partie de sa vie dans ses efforts pour former l’unité politique et mettre fin aux luttes entre les factions dans la région arabe. Les combats contre les Croisés n’ont occupé qu’un tiers du temps consacré à l’action militaire contre les princes Al zenkyines et autres brigands et voyous arabes.
Il faut garder conscience vigilante que la fragmentation confessionnelle et doctrinaire, l’égoïsme des intérêts mesquins, le sectarisme ethnique et la division politique des dirigeants et le silence des populations musulmanes de l’époque, était la raison de la réussite de l’arrivée et de l’implantation des Croisades au cœur du monde arabe. Il ne faut pas perdre de vue que la présence continue et trop longue des croisés sur le sol arabe n’est pas la résultat de leur supériorité mais la conséquence dépend objective de la dégradation continue ,morale et politique, de la personnalité arabe qui est devenu, de ce fait, otage des convoitises et faille vulnérable face aux appétits colonialistes. Le monde arabe otage de la gouvernance insensée des dirigeants arabes et de leurs divergences politiques scandaleuses se transforme inévitablement en proie facile pour les prédateurs colonisateurs comme les croisés.
Salah Eddine ne doit pas être vue dans une vision messianique. Il est à la fois le produit et le continuateur d’un long processus libératoire qui a commencé par imad Eddine zinqi et Noor Mahmoud qui avaient en tête le projet révolutionnaire de libération de Jérusalemen, de la Palestine et du monde arabe. Les prédécesseurs de Salah Eddine engagé sur la voie de la libération l leur manquait les deux conditions de réussite : l’unité des rangs politiques et l’unité de commandement militaires qui permettaient de réaliser cet objectif de grande envergure. Aucune ambition légitime et noble ne peut se concrétiser dans des conditions de déliquescence morale et politique et sans planification qui met en place la stratégie, les moyens et les programmes d’actions.
Salah Eddine avait l’avantage d’avoir la vision lucide et la conscience religieuse et politique de cette situation anormale, politiquement et moralement. Il avait aussi la compétence d’agir avec savoir, intelligence et prudence trouver l’opportunité et la pertinence pour surmonter les obstacles, les affronter ou les contourner sans perdre de vue l’effort stratégique des efforts tactiques, les visées lointaines des visées à court et moyen terme. Il a montré que la planification intelligente conjugué à a la volonté permettent de se renforcer progressivement contre l’occupant et de rendre faisable la libération dont la concrétisation est rendue de plus en plus proche et de plus en plus évidente tant pour lui que pour ses proches et les populations musulmanes.
Salah Eddine en écrivant au Calife abbasside al Moustandi billah : » Si les affaires de la guerre trouvaient solution dans la pluralité des participations on n’aurait pas manqué sans doute la gloire qui nous fait défaut au vu de l’importance du nombre de prétendants autonomes chacun réclamant pour lui l’autorité. On n’aurait pas été amené à subir des préjudices s’il était naturel que le monde supporte la coexistence de plusieurs autorités contradictoires. Mais la vérité que nous ne pouvons ni occulter ni fuir sans préjudices et dommages et que les affaires de la guerre exigent une longue préparation et une excellente planification qui ne peuvent se passer de l’unité de commandement militaire et de l’unité de décision politique. Si la question du commandement est réglée et la planification politique tranchée il ne reste alors que la mise en place des organes consultatifs sur les questions de mobilisation des moyens pour mener les combats victorieux … »( 58).
Ces quelques mots résument la doctrine de Salah Eddine sur l’Etat moderne et sur la guerre de libération. Ils sont le meilleur témoignage sur la stratégie victorieuse de Nasser Salah Eddine Youssef al Ayoubi dans la reconquête de Jérusalem.
Auteur : l’écrivain et historien égyptien Qassem Abdou Qassem
Traduction Omar Mazri
Notes du traducteur :
Celui qui veut faire un travail comparatif qu’il lise par exemple les Croisades sur Wikipédia. Vous aurez plus de détails mais une vision de l’histoire du côté occidental. Ici c’est une lecture non apologétique mais du côté arabe et musulman. Le francophone peut trouver dans cette traduction, malgré ses fautes, une autre source d’information et une autre lecture de la libération de Jérusalem. L’auteur égyptien, Qassem Abdou Qassem, historien et écrivain, est allé à l’essentiel : montrer les causes de la défaite et de la victoire qui sont exactement les mêmes au Xème ou au XXIsiècle.
J’aimerais ajouter trois élément d’appréciation qui font partie de la culture islamique et que l’auteur n’a pas soulevé dans son excellent article.
Le premier est l’espérance que doit garder le croyant, même dans les situations les plus tragiques, car l’espérance fait partie intégrante de la foi. Le rapport de force politique et militaire est important dans l’issue d’une bataille mais il n’est pas déterminant. La foi et la vertu du combattant et de son environnement social sont l’autre élément décisif dans la victoire ou la défaite. C’est la loi de Dieu qui s’est appliquée et qui s’appliquera car Il est créateur de l’homme, de ses actes et des conséquences de ses actes et elle s’applique selon la loi de la causalité et du mérite et selon d’autres lois qui échappent à notre entendement :
{Ô vous qui croyez ! Si certains d’entre vous renient leur foi, Dieu fera surgir d’autres hommes qu’Il aimera et qui L’aimeront. Humbles avec les croyants, durs envers les négateurs, ils combattront au service de Dieu, sans la crainte d’aucun reproche.} Al-Maidah 54.
Le second élément est l’aspect épique ou charismatique qu’on attribue au commandant victorieux ou au dirigeant qui s’est particulièrement illustre dans une situation politique ou géopolitique oubliant le rôle de tous ses anonymes dont on ignore le sacrifice, les souffrances et le rôle déterminant dans la préparation et l’exécution du destin et de l’histoire. Nous devons nous libérer du culte du chef et de l’attente messianique car le destin c’est vous, moi, nous tous si nous agissons avec sincérité, intelligence et de concert sans chercher la fausse gloire. Mohamed (saws) a fait éloge des exilés. On lui a demandé qui étaient les éxilés (al Ghouraba) il a expliqué que ce sont des gens dont le comportement est si humble et si effacé qu’ils paraissent des étrangers insignifiants parmi les leurs mais dont l’action n’est connue efficace et méritoire n’est connue que de Dieu. Leur récompense auprès de Dieu n’aura d’égale que leur anonymat dans ce monde: » les exilés sont ces gens quand ils sont parmi vous vous ne faites pas cas de leur présence et quand ils sont loin de vous vous ne remarquez pas leur absence mais dont les oeuvres auprès de Dieu sont considérables »
Le troisième est aux amateurs de berbérité, d’arabité ou de kurdité, de chiisme et de sunnisme : il faut juste rappeler que la civilisation musulmane même dans sa décadence a toujours posé le problème de l’arabité en terme de culture et non en terme d’ethnie. Salah Eddine était Kurde par sa naissance mais sa culture était arabe et il a combattu tous ceux qui favorisaient la fragmentation de la nation musulmane au nom de la confession, de la doctrine ou de l’ethnie. Les chrétiens du monde arabe se considèrent comme arabe faisant partie de la vaste culture musulmane. Les chrétiens et les juifs de l’orient musulman se considèrenent comme partie intégrale et indissociable de la culture musulmane. Tout sectarisme pratiqué par un musulman est condamnable.
(36) ديفيد جاكسون، « معركة حطين » ، ص86 – ص87.
(37) نفسه، ص92- ص93.
(38) سميل، الحروب الصليبية ، ص152- ص153.
(39 ) نفسه، ص176- ص177.
(40) ابن شداد، النوادر السلطانية، ص60 – ص73؛ العماد الأصفهاني، الفتح القسي، ص17- ص45؛ مجهول، البستان الجامع لجمع تواريخ الزمان (نشره كلود كاهن) انظر:
Claude Cahen ، » Une Chronique Syrienne de VI- XII Siecle: Le » Bustan Al Jami » ، en Bulletin d، Etudes Orientales ، toms. VI-VIII، (Annees 1937-1938 ) ، pp. 146-ff.
(41) سميل، الحروب الصليبية، ص179- ص180.
(42) عن معركة حطين، انظر: ابن الأثير، الكامل، ج9 ، ص177- ص179 وقد ذكر ابن الأثير ما نصه « .. وكان من يرى الأسرى لكثرتهم لا يظن أن هناك قتلى، فإذا رأى القتلى حسب أنه لم هناك أسرى… »، انظر أيضا: ابن شداد، النوادر السلطانية، ص60- ص73؛ الأصفهاني ، الفتح القسي ، ص17- ص45؛ ابن واصل ، مفرج الكروب ، ج2، ص187- ص192المقريزيي، السلوك، ج1، ص93؛ ميخائيل زابوروف، الصليبيون في الشرق (دار التقدم، موسكو 1986م ) ، ص191- ص192.
Mayer،op. cit. ، pp. 131-132 ; Runciman ، op. cit. vol. II ، pp. 450 -460.
(43) الأصفهاني، الفتح القسي في الفتح القدسي، ص80- ص81.
(44) المقريزي، السلوك، ج1، ص93.
Mayer، op، cit.، pp. 131- 132.
(45) الأصفهاني، الفتح القسي في الفتح القدسي، ص89 – ص91.
(46) ابن تغري بردي، النجوم الزاهرة في ملوك مصر والقاهرة (طبعة مصورة عن طبعة دار الكتب المصرية – الهيئة العامة قصور الثقافة 2008م) ،ج6 ، ص35.
(47) الأصفهاني، الفتح القسي، ص92- ص115؛ ابن الأثير، الكامل، ج9 ، ص176 – ص178، ابن تغري بردي، النجوم الزاهرة، ج 6، ص35 – ص67؛ ابن واصل، مفرج الكروبي، ج2 ، ص209 – ص 211؛ المقريزي، السلوك، ج1، ص95؛ ابن شداد، النوادر السلطانية، ص80 –ص81؛ أبو شامة، ج2 ، ص95.
Runciman ، op. cit. ، vol. II ، pp.461- 462.
(48) ابن واصل، مفرج الكروب، ج2 ، ص209- ص211.
(49) ابن تغري بردي، النجوم الزاهرة ، ج6، ص36؛..Mayer،op.cit.p.132.
(50 ) Ibid ، pp.131-132.
(51) الأصفهاني، الفتح القسي، ص127.
(52) مونتجومري وات، « الحملات الصليبية: تصورات مختلفة » في كتاب ، 800 عام – حطين والعمل العربي الموحد (دار الشروق 1989م)، ص80.
(53) ابن شداد، النوادر السلطانية، ص 129؛ الأصفهاني، الفتح القسي، ص127- ص137؛ المقريزي، السلوك، ج1، ص97؛ ابن تغري بردي، النجوم الزاهرة ، ج6، ص36- ص37؛
Runciman ، op. cit. ، vol. II ، pp. 264-266.
(54) المقريزي، السلوك، ج1، ص97.
(55) ابن الأثير، الكامل، ج 9، ص182 وما بعدها.
(56) ابن شداد، النوادر السلطانية، ص235 – ص237؛ الأصفهاني، الفتح القسي، ص138- ص140؛ البستان الجامع، ص146 – ص147؛ المقريزي، السلوك، ج1، ص96- ص99؛ ابن تغري بردي، النجوم الزاهرة، ج6، ص37؛ انظر أيضا:
Mayer ، op. cit. p132; Runciman ، op. cit. vol. II ،pp.446- 447.
(57) قاسم عبده قاسم، في تاريخ الأيوبيين والمماليك (دار عين للدراسات والبحوث 2007م) ، ص62 – 63.
(58) أبو شامة، الروضتين، ص48؛ ابن واصل، واصل، مفرج الكروب ، ج1، ص15
A transcontinental Muslim Alliance capable to face and defeat militarily Israel-NATO by 2020 is born. After different strategic moves in Egypt and at the top level of 'Saudis clans fighting'. Israel attacked the Pakistani base of Kamra to try to stop this 'new alliance' to take real shape by dismantling Pakistan and Saudi Arabia at the same time.
Pakistan: Attack On PAF Kamra
By Raja G Mujtaba,
http://www.opinion-maker.org/2012/08/pakistan-attack-on-paf-kamra/
Morsi joining alliance against Zionist terror?
First published at Press TV
By firing some of Egypt's leading Mossad-assisted false flag terrorists last Sunday, he may have taken a significant step in that direction.
To say that the Egyptian president is “moving boldly” is an understatement. Last Sunday, President Morsi fired the chiefs of Egypt's navy, air force, and air defense forces, along with the defense minister and army chief of staff. All of the fired military leaders were closely associated with the defunct Mubarak regime.
But like JFK, who did not tell the world the full truth about the CIA's and military's attempt to hoodwink him into invading Cuba, President Morsi may not yet be telling the whole truth about what really happened in Sinai and why he really fired his military leadership.
Egypt's top military officials, especially those closest to Mubarak, were notorious for their collaboration with Israel's Mossad in arranging false flag terror attacks designed to be blamed on “radical Muslims.” The attack in the Sinai, which killed sixteen Egyptian border guards, may have been such a false flag.
Whenever a spectacular, widely-reported terrorist attack occurs, the first question that must be asked is cui bono, or “who gains”? Israel's Ha’aretz correspondent Akiva Eldar said of the Sinai attack: “The Israelis are in a way quite happy that the Egyptians have learnt their lesson, that they have to listen to us, and have had to pay the price.” In other words, the only party with anything obvious to gain from the Sinai attack was Israel, which wanted to punish Egypt for starting to open up its borders with Gaza.
While the attack was publicly attributed to Salafi jihadists, its extreme professionalism suggests that it must have had a state sponsor. As Dr. Ashraf Ezzat wrote in Veterans Today:
“Regardless of how the brainwashed jihadists view it, this terrorist operation only benefits Israel. And in fact, some Egyptian analysts have strong doubts as to the role of Israel in this terrorist operation and how it had been anticipated by the Israeli intelligence only two days before.
“What are the chances for two armed vehicles haphazardly storming the Israeli borders of surviving the attack, let alone achieve anything. Were the assailants not aware that they would be spotted on the Israelis’ radar the moment they crossed the line and stepped into the Israeli side of the borders? … Or were they assured otherwise?”
The Mubarak cronies running Egypt's military were notorious for their collaboration with Israel in similar false flag operations. As I wrote in the immediate aftermath of the Egyptian Revolution:
“One of the biggest sparks that set off the Egyptian revolution was blacked out of the US media.
“That spark was widespread anger that Mubarak's regime collaborated with the Israeli Mossad to bomb a Coptic church in Alexandria on New Years’ Eve - and blame it on Muslims. The whole Middle East saw right through it immediately, and the Egyptian people's disgust was a big part of what led them to overthrow Mubarak.”
A Western poll taken in Egypt showed that 72% of Egyptians do not believe that al-Qaeda was responsible for the 9/11 attacks in America. In this, they are in complete agreement with Egypt's leading public intellectual, Mohammed Heikal, who said in October 2001: “Bin Laden has been under surveillance for years: every telephone call was monitored and al-Qaeda has been penetrated by American intelligence, Pakistani intelligence, Saudi intelligence, Egyptian intelligence. They could not have kept secret an operation that required such a degree of organization and sophistication.”
President Morsi, for his part, may be following in the footsteps of Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad by publicly opposing false flag terrorism and standing up for 9/11 truth. Like Ahmadinejad, Fidel Castro of Cuba, Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, and former Italian President Cossiga, Egypt's new president has publicly stated that he does not believe the official story of 9/11.
Additionally, President Morsi publicly supports the movement to free Omar Abdel Rahman, the so-called "blind Sheikh," who was falsely blamed for the mobbed-up New York FBI office's bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993. (The FBI also orchestrated the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, according to convicted bomber Terry Nichols.)
With Iran's president demanding 9/11 truth and fighting off Mossad terrorism, and the democratic elements of Turkey's leadership surviving such false flag terror plots as Sledgehammer and Ergenekon, will Egypt's President Morsi join in an eventual regional alliance against Zionist-assisted false flag terror? By firing some of Egypt's leading Mossad-assisted false flag terrorists last Sunday, he may have taken a significant step in that direction.
2 comments:
I believe that Erdogan is an asset of the CIA.
- Angirfan
Eid Mubarak