16 nov. 2019

Israel plans to dismantle and break up Pakistan and Saudi Arabia at the same time to maintain her claim to have the full control over oil, gas, drug and goods routes in the MENA, SCAR regions

An Analysis of Logistic Support to the US and NATO in Afghanistan: Is Pakistan still relevant? 

by Umar Hayat,



“It’s OK for strategy to be conducted by amateurs, but logistics requires professionals.”

With the deployment of their forces in Afghanistan in the aftermath of 9/11, the US and NATO have been transporting large quantities of logistics goods to Afghanistan for sustenance of their troops and conduct of operations. Since Pakistan afforded an easy access to Afghanistan, therefore, it was an obvious and convenient choice for the US and NATO Forces to transit its military equipment, reconstruction material and logistic cargo to Afghanistan via Pakistan. The number of coalition troops in Afghanistan kept growing consistently since deployment in 2001and rose to around 1,00,000 (98,765 troops) in December 2009. On 1 December 2009, President Obama announced the deployment of an additional 30,000 US troops during 2010 and urged other partners to increase their troops by 10,000. Accordingly afresh inductions made total strength of troops over 130, 000 by end of 2011 with 50-70000 vehicles. For sustaining such a large force in the land locked Afghanistan, the US and NATO needed to import a wide range of materiel into Afghanistan; the bulk of which routed through the port of Karachi, Pakistan.

Pak-US relations experienced many ups and downs during the past decade resulting into destruction of cargoes and interruption of supplies many times. Such hiccups while highlighted the vulnerability of the US and NATO Forces, also exhibited Pakistan’s leverage in smooth sustenance of the forces and their success in Afghanistan. The US planners, visualizing that total dependence on Pakistan may limit their strategic options and realizing that enhanced leverage of Pakistan for maintenance of their forces in Afghanistan could be employed unfavourably, started exploring alternate supply routes to Afghanistan as early as 2005. However, the efforts to formalize the alternate supply route gained momentum in 2008 as the trust deficit between the US and Pakistan grew manifold at that time. Resultantly US decided to open the northern supply routes captioned as Northern Distribution Network (NDN); a commercially based logistical corridor connecting Baltic and Black Sea ports with Afghanistan via Russia and Central Asia. The US finalized accords with various Central Asian States during 2009 but she could convince the Russians in July 2010 for use of the supply route constructed by Soviets during 1980s for logistic support of their forces in Afghanistan.

With a plan in hand and alternative supply routes available, the US military had been reducing its reliance on PakGLOCs (Pakistan Ground Lines of Communications). In general terms, of all cargo destined for Afghanistan during 2009, about half used to pass through Pakistan, approximately 30 % through the NDN and 20 % by air. Since then the reliance on the NDN has been increasing and the volume of cargo kept growing through the north. Presently, roughly 85% of the fuel consumed by the US military in Afghanistan and 75% supplies are routed through Central Asia. The most obvious reason for such increased volumes on the NDN could be the closure of PakGLOCs for last seven months after Salala episode. While the arrangements made by the US and NATO for transportation of logistics show element of flexibility and avoids undue reliance on any one route or country, yet given the geography of the region, all of the supply routes into landlocked Afghanistan are difficult. A hostile Iran borders the west. The NDN passes through an underdeveloped infrastructure and politically unstable region which is strongly influenced by Russia and Pak GLOCs suffer from variety of problems too. In this contextual frame work, it is essential to analyze the efficacy of the NDN vis-a-vis PakGLOCs to determine the degree of Pakistan’s relevance for sustenance of the US and NATO forces in Afghanistan, execution of scheduled withdrawal by 2014 and for materialization of stakes of the major players in the region. This paper will only focus on the aspects which contribute towards either increasing or decreasing the relevance of Pakistan for sustaining the US and NATO forces in Afghanistan. Having taking cognizance of routes related aspects, analysis in relation to Pakistan’s leverage will be offered.

PakGLOCs (Pakistan Ground Lines of Communications)
In Pakistan there are mainly two corridors / routes which are used for transportation of all the categories of cargo moving to Afghanistan. Approximately, 60% of this volume goes to Kabul via the Peshawar / Torkham route and remaining 40% travels through Quetta / Chaman to Kandahar. An estimated 200 trucks crossed the border daily before blockade imposed by Pakistan after Salala episode on 26 November 2011. These shipments are handled entirely by commercial carriers and require no US / NATO military presence in Pakistan. Karachi-Torkham route is about 1948 kilometers long with the capacity of 100-125 containers per day. Cargos moving on this route take 6-9 days in Pakistan and 16 days till Kabul, Afghanistan. The Karachi-Chaman route is around 1110 kilometers with the capacity of 75-100 containers per day. It takes 5-7 days in Pakistan and 12 days till Kandahar on this route.

In the present logistic system, cargo moving to Afghanistan through Pakistan falls into three distinct categories of cargo being handled by various carrying agencies. First category is Afghan Transit Trade Goods (Commercial Cargo which is commonly called as ATT Goods). It is being handled exclusively by Pakistan Railways and NLC. The second category is Afghan Cargo (Non Commercial which pertains to humanitarian aid). It comprises of Reconstruction Cargo, Rehabilitation Cargo and Non-Governmental Organization’s Cargo i.e. NGO Goods. It constitutes 17% of the total cargo that moves to Afghanistan. It is also being handled by NLC through its registered Transport Contractors (Hired Mechanical Transport) Contractors. The third category is Coalition Forces (NATO / ISAF and Embassies Cargo). It constitutes 83% of the total cargo which is moving to Afghanistan through Pakistan. It is being moved by the Coalition Forces under their own arrangements through their civilian hired contractors who are mainly American and Western citizens. Responsibility for safe delivery inside Afghanistan also lies with these private contractors and they use their own dedicated ship liners. Transport and shipment of the cargo till arrival at Karachi Port is totally handled by these individuals. On arrival at Karachi, it is handled by Pakistani Contractors to whom it has been sublet.



Hazards for Pakistan in Provision of GLOCs to the US and NATO
While the necessity of using PakGLOCs make Pakistan one of the most important country in accomplishment of GWOT related designs of the US and NATO, there are gray areas as well causing complications and raising serious concerns to policy makers and populace both. The lack of monitoring system is one of the chief anxieties. About 40% cargo of NATO and token cargo of the US entering Pakistan through Port Qasim is being scanned by NLC; the cargo coming through Karachi Port (KPT) is not being scanned owing to any scanning facility. With the start of scanning at Port Qasim, arrival of High Cube Container (9.5 feet high) got increased. The scanning of same is not possible as it cannot pass through the installed scanners. Beside that no scanning and monitoring of cargo en-route is being done. Anti-state elements and foreign hands are exploiting this weakness to their advantage. Cargo transporters do not adhere to the designate routes and resort to deviations suiting their own convenience. This too jeopardizes the security arrangements and denies effective monitoring. The problem is further compounded due to no defined mechanism for carrying out security check en-route. Strangely, despite laps of over 11 years, no single agency is made responsible to handle such an important issue. Also Pakistani agencies have no access of RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) allowing visibility of about 90% cargo to US authorities only. No documentation of return cargo is another grey area allowing anti-state elements to execute their nefarious activities. The theft / pilferage en-route is one of the most serious hazards through which unauthorized cargo including weapons and ammunition can be spread on the Pakistani soil for any purpose. Even capability building for variety of nefarious activities is possible in the garb of looting / destruction. Possibility of developing monitoring or guiding capability against Pakistan’s strategic assets in this garb cannot be ruled out. Evaluation of the pattern, frequency and areas of looting and destruction will help to ascertain such postulations and designs.

The Northern Distribution Network (NDN)
In this section of paper the aspects related to the NDN will be examined for drawing comparison to PakGLOCs. Any military logistician since Alexander the Great could tell that landlocked Afghanistan is not an easily accessible destination. Given the growing insecurity of Pakistani supply routes, increasing demand for nonmilitary supplies and the exorbitant costs associated with a “Berlin airlift” to Afghanistan, the Unites States sought to create new logistical corridor. In 2008, Pentagon strategists, seeing an uptick in violence against their cargo and fuel trucks in Pakistan, began looking for an alternative route. What they came up with was the Northern Distribution Network (NDN). This change reflected a decision to demilitarize the character of the project and rely exclusively on commercial carriers transporting nonmetal goods.

The Northern Distribution Network or NDN traverses over 3,100 mile of seas, roads and rails of various countries like Georgia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Latvia, Estonia and Russia. Via this network, supplies start their journey either in a Black Sea port in Georgia or the Baltic Sea port of Riga, Latvia or Estonia. The NDN faces realities like dictators regimes, fear of act of extremism, political sensitivity about the NATO missile shield, poor infrastructure, the constant loading and offloading of goods between ships, rail and trucks, etc. The NDN got operating with the first shipments made in March 2009. The NDN provided 35% of US supplies in April 2010, 50% in April 2011, and 55%-65% in July-September 2011. Currently, around 75% of all the goods transported by land including 85% of the fuel was being transported via the NDN.



The NDN involves three spurs. These are known as NDN North, South and KKT.

The NDN North
The Northern Spur brings supplies by ship to the Latvian port of Riga. From there, it uses existing Soviet-era rail line to traverse Russia, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan and cargo enters Afghanistan from Uzbekistan at Termez. While this route avoids Pakistan, it is more expensive. In addition, it goes through Russia, which has its own national interests. This makes the US vulnerable to Russian policy demands.



The NDN South
The Southern Spur brings supplies by ship or rail to Georgian port of Poti on the Black Sea, then by rail through Georgia and Azerbaijan, by ferry across the Caspian Sea and by rail again through Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. The port of Turkmenistan could be an additional destination for goods leaving Baku by ferry. This route avoids both Pakistan and Russia. But it is complex, transiting several countries and requires offloading to several different transportation modes along the way. Consequently, it is the most expensive route and has limited capacity.



The KKT (Kazakhstan-Kyrgyzstan-Tajikistan)
The KKT route includes Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan. KKT provides a backup to the Uzbek border crossing Termez. According to the US TRANSCOM (Transport Command), this route has some bad stretches of road in Tajikistan that limit throughput.



Challenges to the US and NATO for Operating the NDN
The NDN remains subject to a range of geopolitical dangers and logistical inefficiencies. Following aspects make the prospective doomed:


Long Traveling Timings
On the NDN, the supplies travel through Germany, Austria, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, ultimately terminating at the US supply bases in Afghanistan. Multiple mode changes are necessary. Rail-gauge incompatibilities eliminated potential routes through the NATO partner nations of Poland and the Czech Republic causing further delays. On average, from the time an order is placed to the time of delivery, it takes on average about 75 days transit time from Germany to Afghanistan.



Security
Increased use of the NDN could draw the attention of militants leading to the same type of attacks on fuel tankers that have been seen in Pakistan. Cargo and oil tanks remain stuck up on the Uzbek side of the border for weeks before passing into Afghanistan. Taliban strikes in the region against such targets could not be deemed “beyond the realm of possibility”. Some US military strategists fear that bringing Central Asia into the theatre of war could lead to an increased threat of attack by the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan and the Islamic Jihad Union groups that have a loyal following in the Fergana valley which stretches through Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan.

Chocking Effect due to bottleneck of Salang Tunnel
The way in and out from Afghan is through treacherous Salang Tunnel which was built by the Soviets. It travels 11,000 feet up the Hindu Kush Mountains. Years of war, neglect and geology have turned it into a dangerous bottleneck. Pavements have been deteriorated into extremely rough, bumpy, dirt and in some places, mud road. The tunnel is barely wide enough for two lanes of traffic and the uneven road surface means trucks often tilt over at precarious angles. Even though the tunnel is only 1.6 miles long, a drive through it takes unusual time because it’s jammed with massive trucks inching along the cratered road. At times dust gets so thick that one could barely see five feet in front. Lines of trucks waiting to pass through the tunnel often stretch up to 10 miles on either side which would further pile up during the withdrawal phase. In such a scenario, one can realize the fragile security environment at the time of withdrawal with the level of support to the US and NATO almost diminished.



Capacity and Cost
The chief disadvantage to relying solely on the NDN is that there is a limit to how much it can carry and how quickly. The number of TEU / containers could be expanded to 500 per week, if needed and 24,000 TEUs per year could be transported while operating at the maximum capacity of the NDN, but it would be at a cost of 250% more per TEU than supplies moving along PakGLOCs. Each container coming through the NDN to Afghanistan costs $14,000. AS per some estimates, it is $17,500. As the deadline of 2014 looms, cost will go through the roof. Already deals for bases in the CARs are being renegotiated way up, upwards. About 40 to 45% of the NDN comprises sea routes, while the rest is covered through rail and road networks. The Pakistani route, on the contrary, costs $7,000, since 80 to 85% of the distance is via sea while the rest is through road. Even after paying $5,000 per container to Pakistan, the cost of shipping supplies through Pakistani territory will be less than that incurred using the NDN and will take less time. Purely from logistical standpoint, the NDN appears to be a resounding achievement having provided an alternative; making the US and NATO free of one single route and country, yet it cannot diminish the necessity of PakGLOCs altogether for a prolonged period.

Poor Infrastructure
It relies on poor infrastructure, both along its routes and within Afghanistan, which only has two short railway lines across its northern border with Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan. Despite recent construction efforts, the lack of effective entry points and Afghanistan’s poor road links are huge limiting factors to deliver supplies throughout Afghanistan via the NDN.

Time Delay at Borders
Transportation of cargo through the NDN involve border crossing of 9 countries which results into undesired delays owing to variety of law and inadequate custom clearance system. For instance DLA Director Vice Admiral Alam Thompson noted in March 2010: “one issue we’re working on is a time delay at the border with Uzbekistan that was more than 30 days… we’re closer to 20 days now, but we still need to reduce it further”. Meanwhile, railway experts have questioned whether the existing rail route through Uzbekistan is capable of handling the amount of traffic envisioned by the US military and its allies.

The Russia Factor
For Russians it is a dilemma no less complicated than for the Americans. Besides the diplomatic issues, Russia which is the main player in the Central Asian region sees NATO at its front door in the Baltic countries; it’s backdoor in Afghanistan and in its basement in the other “stans” in Central Asia. On the other hand, Russia would never like all NATO equipment falling into the hands of the Taliban or other extremist groups. She would prefer that NATO wipe out the Taliban before getting out, otherwise, the Russians see themselves worrying about Afghanistan again. Moreover, the US determination to extend its military presence in the region after 2014, which Moscow categorically opposes, will be of key importance.

Geopolitical Schisms
Although logistically viable routes through China and Iran exist for diversifying supply lines into Afghanistan, they have not been explored for geopolitical reasons illustrating that such political rifts are one of the biggest obstacles to the easy flow of logistics from routes other than PakGLOCs and the NDN. Moreover, marred relations among countries housing the NDN in the region would remain a challenge of regular nature.

Multinational Regulations
Working with various jurisdictions involved for making sure the shipments comply with each country’s rules and requirements for timely delivery; else undesired delays would be a frequent feature.

Competing Stakes of Major Players in the Central Asia
Since 2001, the OEF and ISAF missions together with the cooperation between the countries in Central Asia and the coalition have radically changed the region and strengthened the individual states. The logistical role for the mission in Afghanistan has resulted in a notable influx of funds to CARs which has significantly strengthened the region’s countries vis-à-vis Russia. They have gained importance and political independence and broken Russia’s monopoly on shaping the regional security situation. During the next two years greater efforts will be made to make maximum use of available political and economic opportunities. While the withdrawal of the US and NATO forces from Afghanistan is expected to increase the level of instability in the region and change the relationship between Russia, China and the USA, it is also likely to cause thorough revision of the geopolitical balance of power in the region. It is expected that the US and countries in the region themselves will remain interested in maintaining or strengthening a US military presence in the region. Russia and China which are emphasizing for coordination of their policies towards Afghanistan beyond 2014, will strongly oppose the US military presence in the region. Such processes will also significantly affect the functioning of the NDN and encourage its exploitation for use in political manoeuvring.

Analysis: Pakistan’s relevance will not diminish
While all are preparing for the new cold war which the US along with her allies intends to initiate against China and Russia, Pakistan would become a special arena for competing and conflicting stakes of major players in the new geo-political scenario emerging rapidly in the world, focusing on Afghanistan. Disagreements exist between the US and China over Taiwan and Pacific issues. Russia opposes the US intentions to deploy national missile defence system (NMD) in Europe and expansion of NATO towards Eastern Europe. Both Russia and China exhibited consonance in their policy against the US on many issues: they vetoed the UN Security Council resolution calling the Syrian president to quit, opposed the US-led NATO attack on Libya and urged the US to resolve the Iran’s nuclear issue peacefully. Pakistan, after reassessing her engagement with the US in the aftermath of incidents like 2 May and 26 November 2011, besides China, has also established relationship with the Russia. In this backdrop, some of the aspects which will keep Pakistan relevant to the US and NATO for sustenance of their forces in Afghanistan, during the withdrawal phase and for stable Afghanistan beyond 2014 are explored in the ensuing paragraphs.

Historical context
While Soviets could not rely on timely supply support from home depots in 1980s due to geographical and terrain related difficulties only with no multinational political issues to be managed, how can the US and NATO totally rely on the NDN especially when seen vis-à-vis additional hiccups of political diversity and other factors highlighted above.

The cargo losses in Pakistan are negligible
The main projected reason for diversification cargo routes to Afghanistan was to reduce reliance on PakGLOCs owing to security reason, while disruptive, the material lost from insurgent attacks and pilferage was a fraction of what the United States successfully transported from Pakistan to Afghanistan. General J. McNabb, commander of the U.S. Transportation Command once stated that the attrition along the Pakistani supply line was not severe enough to hamper the overall war effort. The PakGLOCs will remain viable despite occasional losses by militants. Containers passed through Pakistan since 2002 got damaged at the rate of approximately 10% which is negligible and affordable. Resumption of supplies from Pakistan after seven months, despite ability to transport 75% via the NDN, substantiates this view point.

High cost and limited capacity of the NDN
The significant advantage of alternate route, end of the US complete logistical reliance on Pakistan, availability of new opportunities for the US engagement in the Central Asian region notwithstanding, high cost and limited capacity of the NDN necessitates keeping Pakistan on board.

PakGLOCs will remain vital even if the NDN is available
The US alone has some 100,000 shipping containers filled with stuff and 50,000 wheeled vehicles to send through the pipeline back to the US before the end of 2014. Although the NDN are available having accruing benefits, the US will still have to use the Pakistani ground supply routes as well to get everything out of Afghanistan as per laid down timelines.

Linkage of Gwadar and Kandahar
The city of Kandahar, the largest Pashtun and the second largest city of the Afghanistan, when connected with the Gwadar will establish linkage with Afghanistan and beyond (all Central Asia, Europe and much of the Middle East). If this link is established and opened, it would cut the transport time from Europe to Pakistan and Southeast Asia substantially. Although Iran with help from Russia and India is developing competing port of Chabahar but it is not as well situated as Gwadar for the emerging continental trade. On Gwadar, the interests of the U S, Afghanistan and Pakistan are aligned. It is past time to seize this opportunity and open Kandahar to long-distance traffic. It will give Central Asian States a southern alternative instead of shipping everything to market through distant Russia. Pakistan, thus, stands a chance to benefit enormously exploiting this importance and enhance her soft image and seek relevance. Pakistan, therefore, should lure in the interested stake holders to build a highway connecting Gwadar and Kandahar.

Withdrawal could be a nightmare
It is estimated that 1,30,000 soldiers, 50-70,000 vehicles and 1,20,000 containers must be moved out by 2014. The US and NATO are quite aware of Afghanistan’s history with invaders. Military withdrawals from Afghanistan have ended in disaster several times in the past. When the British left Kabul in 1842, only a few fortunate members of an expedition force of 17,000 escaped. The Soviets withdrawal in 1989 also ended in chaos, as their convoys struggled through the snow-covered mountains at Salang Tunnel while under fire from the Mujahideen. Both the British and the Soviets left a country that they had been unable to pacify. This also holds true for the US and NATO today. Afghan insurgents will presumably do everything possible to launch attacks on NATO troops as they withdraw.

The pressure during Drawdown may result into hot pursuit operations on Pakistani soil
The US and NATO would be required to increase air power to protect the withdrawing troops. This is historically what the US has done, most especially in Vietnam during 1972. Increased air power is necessary for extrication of troops from interior Afghanistan. For the Iraq withdrawal, the US set up staging areas to move equipment to various staging areas, where it was prepared for shipment and then moved to Kuwait for storage until ready to be shipped out. They will not have these luxuries in Afghanistan. This could mean the smaller outposts will have to pack themselves up and ready for road transport out all the while being vulnerable to attack. They have to face all the risks of driving out of the mountains themselves. This all raises worries about the security of the forces that would be withdrawing and those remaining after the drawdown. If scheduled drawdown by 2014 is implemented, a stage may come wherein employing air power to protect the troops from insurgents including hot pursuit operations most likely on Pakistani soil become necessary. The sudden surge in the endeavours for operating the NDN at full capacity and unusual increase in carrier based aircrafts in the region reinforces such postulations.

Opening of Pak GLOCs after seven months illustrates that Pakistan is relevant and shall remain so even beyond 2014

The decision for restoration of Pak GLOCs as a preferred route despite having alternative route of the NDN has many reasons. The analysis of exiting cargo requirements, availability of routes and their capacity, security hazards along various routes with overall impact on the cargo flow, politico- diplomatic intricacies and terrain and weather related complicacies leads to the conclusion that no single route can sustain the logistic requirements for over 1,30,000 troops for foreseeable future. With military needs likely to shrink with intended drawdown of the US and NATO troops, the economic factor is going to take over and prevail in the future. Pakistan based routes will attain rather enhanced relevance allowing a requisite degree of leverage to Pakistan vis-à-vis the US and NATO especially after linkage of Karachi with Kandahar through Gwadar. That fits in the future military and economic overtures. The establishment of secretariat in Kabul for the Central Asia South Asia power supply project and conclusion of TAPI (The Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-lndia Natural Gas Pipeline) projects are akin to a “Eurasian globalization” and the indicators of regional economic collaborations in the offing; bringing ripe moments for Pakistan to benefit exponentially. Late Ambassador Richard Holbrooke believed that there was no solution in Afghanistan unless Pakistan was part of that solution. Pakistan has a strategic geo-political location at the corridor of world major maritime oil supply lines and has close proximity to oil rich central Asian countries. Pakistan’s location could influences Central Asia, South Asia and the Middle East. So, Pakistan is focus of attention in wake of emerging geo-political scenario and its relevance cannot be diminished.

http://zameer36.com/an-analysis-of-logistic-support-to-the-us-and-nato-in-afghanistan-is-pakistan-still-relevant/

Little Ice Age: The Approaching Disaster



By Tom Chatham

There are so many dangers lurking in the shadows today it is difficult to keep up and even harder for the average person to prepare for them all. One of the first things a person must do is to identify the threats and determine a course of action to remain safe. Even without the necessary preparations, knowing what the challenges are gives you an edge on the rest of society when things start to fall apart. Among other things to worry about is a danger from nature that can have catastrophic consequences. A global shift into another ice age. Imagine if you will, humanity attempting to recover from a global financial crisis after having lost their jobs and all of their wealth. If another global disaster suddenly appeared from the shadows at a time when people had no resources to prepare for their survival, what would they do?

Habibullo Abdussamatov, head of space research at Pulkovo Astronomical Observatory in St. Petersburg, Russia predicts that a little ice age could begin by 2014. His theory is that long term variations in the amount of solar energy reaching earth is the principal reason driving and defining the whole mechanism of climate change from global warming to glacial periods. He states that Total Solar Irradiance is the primary factor causing climate variations on Earth, not carbon dioxide. He believes we are headed for a long period of low solar activity that could reduce the energy received by Earth, causing a cooling effect much like the period between 1645 and 1850.

The Earth has spent much of its history moving from one ice age to another separated by short periods of warn weather. An ice age is the norm not the exception on this planet. These periods of warn weather are thought to be around 12,000 years. It seems that we may be nearing the end of one of those warm periods and a shift to a colder climate may be imminent. Some scientists speculate this cold period could last only 30 to 100 years and others think it may last as much as 100,000 years. It could take decades for the climate to cool but there are no guarantees that a small initial change could not happen in the near future that threatens our food production capability. Even if it took decades for the climate to become unbearable to us, our food production would have ceased long before then. Even if you can grow your own food, how will you do so if the weather is too cold?

It may seem crazy to consider this as a threat given the unusually hot weather we are experiencing but if solar irradiance is the cause of global weather, the solar maximum we are about to see peak could be the cause of this hot weather. If this is so, and it is followed by a solar minimum lasting decades, it could have immediate and serious consequences for our climate.

To prepare for possible disasters people have learned to produce their own food and have taken the personal responsibility to store supplies to last for a few years. If we slowly lose the ability to grow crops over several decades, how could anybody possibly store up that many supplies, especially if they have been financially ruined and don't have the money. Even if you stored 20 years worth of food, it would eventually run out, then what? This scenario could lead to the slow starvation of billions. The only way for humanity to survive indefinitely is to have the ability to produce food in a sustainable way.

As with a radiation hazard you have two choices. You can evacuate or shelter in place. The problem with a global disaster, that requires evacuation from some areas, is that if there are safe zones following the disaster, how many people can that safe zone realistically support? If everyone has the same idea of moving to that zone, what will be the outcome? The first people in the zone will see it as their zone and at some point will try to limit or stop others from entering to insure their own survival. This is human nature. If you are one of the first ones in, are you prepared to fight to maintain that zone and for how long? How long do you think you will be able to fight off the rest of the world? If there is a great deal of fighting, will the resources in the safe zone survive destruction? These are all valid questions that we need to answer before something like this becomes a reality.

In an environment where you have to do everything inside, at least for a large portion of the year, energy is the key to everything. With enough energy you can produce light to grow food, stay warm, provide ventilation, produce power and run machines. In some survival situations, energy may be the primary need in order to produce food and pump water.

Wood is a good energy source that humans are very accustomed to using and we have a plentiful supply. One of the problems with long term storage of wood is it's tendency to decay or rot. The fact that we have some homes in America with 200 year old timbers in them attests to the fact that wood under the right circumstances can be stored for a long time.
Coal is a good source of energy and we have an abundant supply of it in this country. We have used coal for over a hundred years and we know how to get the most from it. It can be dirty but will store indefinitely and is a compact source of energy.

In a long term survival situation where energy is a key to staying alive, a dependable source of power will be a necessary component to your plan. The storage of liquid fuels is possible to run a generator but could you afford a 20 year supply of fuel right now if you needed it? If so will it store for that long and how will you replace it when it is all gone? Also, generators running on liquid fuels will require periodic maintenance and replacement of components. Even with a supply of repair parts, your engine will eventually wear out requiring a replacement. You need a power system that is easy to maintain, is extremely durable and is simple enough that you can manufacture parts for if necessary.

A simple, tried and tested power system is steam power. With a boiler and a steam engine you can power just about anything and secondary steam can be used for heating. Machines and generators powered by a power take-off shaft can be run by a single engine. Boilers and steam engines are much simpler in design and function than petroleum based engines making repairs and maintenance long term more realistic. With a power take-off shaft you can run several items off of one engine such as a water pump, DC generator, AC generator, metal working machines and ventilation equipment.

With fuel in limited supply it would be necessary to store power for long periods. A battery system is the natural way to store power but lead acid batteries will only last 5 to 10 years before they lose the ability to hold a charge. A better battery for long term use is a nickel-iron battery. These batteries are very durable, to the extent that some in use today have been used for almost a century. They only require a change of electrolyte every 20 years or so and they are almost impossible to damage by overcharging. They do have draw backs such as not being as efficient as lead acid and needing to be topped of occasionally with distilled water but these things may be secondary considering the service life. The expense is also a consideration that may necessitate a group purchase of items in this type of scenario.

The graph of the Vostok ice core data indicate that Ice Age maximums and warm interglacials occur within a regular cyclic pattern. About every 100,000 years the cold glacial period is interrupted by a warn interglacial period lasting about 12,000 years.

We are now near the end of a warm interglacial period and the Earth is due to enter the next ice age. The Milankovich cycles each affect the amount of solar radiation reaching Earth and act together to produce the cycle of cold Ice Age maximums and warm interglacials.

The data from paleoclimatology, including ice cores, sea sediments, geology, paleobotany and zoology, indicate that we are on the verge of entering another Ice Age, and the data also shows that severe and lasting climate change can occur within only a few years.

In all likelihood, a return to a little ice age will entail cooler summers and colder winters with a growing season 1 to 2 months shorter in many places. This is something we can adapt to and is much less catastrophic than a full fledged ice age with glaciers covering large portions of the northern hemisphere. Even though we will be able to adapt, it will still cause problems with food production in a world that continues to grow at an ever increasing rate. It could still mean shortages and starvation for some around the world as the grain producing regions in the north are able to produce much less or nothing at all in some places. Even a small shift in climate still holds the potential for dire results if we do not plan for it ahead of time. Now is the time to take a serious look at our future and plan appropriately. Next week we will look at the subject of climate change in a little more detail.


Benjamin Stora et le relais de BHL dans le jeu de dominos



Par Omar Mazri,
http://liberation-opprimes.net


Le journal Al Moujahid écrit à la une du 14 mai 2012 : « Dans un entretien au journal en ligne «Mediapart», Benjamin Stora : “Hollande doit faire des gestes d’apaisement mémoriel avec l’Algérie” ». J’en profite pour répondre à notre valeureux journal et au grand Benjamin stora en publiant de nouveau un ancien article sur son évaluation de l’Algérie

Benjamin Stora, universitaire « spécialisé » sur le Maghreb, monte au créneau au Figaro suite à l’agression franco atlantiste contre la Libye pour décréter que les dirigeants algériens donnent l’impression de ne pas tenir compte de la nouvelle donne géopolitique et que «Le régime algérien fait preuve de myopie». Son article plein de « trous noirs » mérite d’être corrigé et refocalisé pour nous éviter les ténèbres qui nous sont promis et que relaye la presse algérienne comme si l’éditeur en chef etait BHL, Benjamin Stora ou un adjudant chef des « Think Tank » français.

Je me rappelle qu’en début des années 2000 le Point avait écrit un article, avec comme tête d’affiche le Général Lamari et comme titre « Harro sur les Généraux ». Le Général algérien croyait que l’interview était à son honneur et qu’il s’adressait au peuple algérien mais la subtilité de la langue française lui a manqué pour comprendre que « Haro » est le cri poussé par quelqu’un pour attirer l’attention sur le coupable d’un forfait ou le cri lancé par les Seigneurs pour galvaniser leurs chiens lancés dans la chasse à courre contre le gros gibier. Quelques mois plus tard le Général Lamari appris la langue française à ses dépens malgré de longs et loyaux services. Le Figaro veut rééditer le coup du Point et Benjamin Stora celui du coup de Tripoli et ainsi préparer la mise à la tête de l’État algérien d’un « plus français que moi tu meurs ». BHL est appelé, pour l’instant à travailler dans les coulisses auprès de ses réseaux algériens. Il est trop ivre par son succès libyen pour apparaitre en plein jour avec une gueule de bois et il risque de froisser la sensibilité des algériens. Entre l’article du Point et celui du Figaro l’Algérie a beaucoup changé mais les fichiers français ne sont pas à jour car l’effet pygmalion joue en leur défaveur : les Algériens qui les renseignent sont déconnectés de la réalité et à leur tour ils ont le regard perverti par le regard porté sur eux par leur manipulateur qu’ils ont informé.



Notre ami et cousin Benjamin Stora veut sans doute envoyer un message aux « Juifs convertis à l’Islam »[i] de l’Algérie post coloniale comme BHL l’a fait à ceux de Misrata en Libye pour faire au sol ce que les bombardements aériens et le pilonnage naval ont préparé à Tripoli



En synthèse de son interview il dit aux algériens d’oublier les réminiscences anti impérialistes et qu’il faut être réaliste « La matrice culturelle du régime algérien a peu changé depuis l’époque Boumediene. Le fer de lance de la diplomatie algérienne, c’est encore en grande partie l’anti-impérialisme des années 1970. Cela peut paraître difficile à croire, mais les dirigeants algériens donnent l’impression de ne pas tenir compte de la nouvelle donne géopolitique, qu’il s’agisse de la chute du mur de Berlin, de la fin de la guerre froide, de l’élection de Barack Obama… » Un universitaire français qui croit au Messianisme obamique, aux fabulations et aux superstitions. Boumediene reste une épine dans la gorge. J’avais pensé que la pensée française avait plus de talent et de subtilités pour exprimer ses haines et ses peurs mais nous avons une fois de plus la confirmation de la mort de l’intelligentsia en France. Il n’y a que les Algériens de Liberté, d’Al Watan et d’autres canailleries à y croire. La référence à la chute du mur de Berlin n’est pas fortuite elle témoigne l’idée dominante en Occident qui se résume en trois points :

- La fin des pôles idéologiques et le triomphe définitif du sionisme et de l’impérialisme ;

- L’axe Vatican CIA a fait tomber le mur de Berlin par le noyautage des mouvements protestataires et « démocratiques » dans les syndicats et dans la société civile ;

- Les Arabes et les Musulmans sont les artisans de la chute de l’URSS et ils restent le fer de lance de la recomposition du monde par leur inculture politique et leur convulsion émotionnelle :
Les Moudjahiddines arabes et afghans qui ont poussé l’URSS à un effort de guerre insoutenable
L’Arabie saoudite qui a fait couler les recettes pétrole de l’URSS ;

Il nous demande de reconnaitre le nouvel ordre mondial et de nous soumettre à la théorie de la domination impérialo sioniste défendue par les néo conservateurs américains et dont les Européens sont devenus les exécutants. Cette théorie est celle de Francis Fukuyama « La fin de l’Histoire ». Il faut nous soumettre au triomphe arrogant du capitalisme, du mode de vie américain et de la domination du sionisme. Il faut nous plier au remodelage du monde musulman selon des schémas ethniques, confessionnels, topographiques dans un Syse Picot 2 qui réalise six objectifs :

- La main mise sur les ressources du sous sol au profit des appétits prédateurs de l’Occident,

- L’impossibilité du monde musulman ou arabe de créer une unité civilisationnelle en disloquant et en fragmentant ce qui est latent à la renaissance islamique en l’occurrence la contigüité spatiale, la continuité historique, la mémoire collective, le devenir commun,

- Le chaos constructeur d’un patchwork à façade démocratique où chaque élément du puzzle disloqué est un comptoir commercial comme dans les traditions des comptoirs anglais, hollandais ou français en Asie et en Afrique ;

- L’installation de bases militaires

- La prise de contrôle du continent africain comme réservoir de matière premières et gisements de marché de consommation pour les biens et services industriels ou domestiques obsolètes

- Encercler la Chine et interdire l’émergence des projets de l’organisation de l’alliance de Shanghai (Russie-Chine) et sa mise en réseau avec les pays du BRIC.

Benjamin Stora dit : « c’est un nationalisme exacerbé qui rejette le principe du droit d’ingérence. Enfin, un certain nombre de responsables algériens redoutent que ce printemps arabe ne fasse le jeu d’un islam radical qu’ils ont combattu tout au long des années 1990. Il est clair que le pouvoir est divisé sur la conduite à adopter. Le courant conservateur tient la corde, mais il ne représente pas forcément l’armée. Il y a des islamo-conservateurs ou de vieux nationalistes arabes qui sont toujours au pouvoir, qui s’accrochent au passé et qui ne comprennent pas les aspirations aux changements de la jeunesse arabe, en particulier de la jeunesse berbère, nombreuse, éduquée et à l’affût des bruits du monde. » Sans commentaire : le nationalisme de canaille, l’islamisme infantile, le berbérisme sectaire sont les portes d’entrées de l’ingérence française en Algérie

Comme toujours il attise les particularismes locaux contre l’unité nationale : « Un espace immense et une population hétérogène qui se compose de Sahariens, de Mozabites, de Kabyles, d’Algérois, d’Oranais qui ne marchent pas forcément du même pas. » Vous reconnaitrez avec moi que depuis qu’il a fuit l’Algérie sa vision sur l’Algérie devient de l’emporte pièces. Oranais et Algérois c’est des ethnies, des confessions, des doctrines, des territoires, des cultures ou des vues d’un esprit qui veut montrer les divisions en Algérie comme insurmontable pour que les Algériens vivent en paix ensemble et qu’il faut partitionner le pays pour le rendre gérable, gouvernable, démocratique et séculier

Cerise sur la tarte storaïque : « En outre, l’Algérie est un pays très riche et le pouvoir dispose de ressources financières considérables de nature à empêcher qu’un mouvement de revendications sociales ne se transforme en contestation politique. Malgré cela, les Algériens sont de plus en plus choqués par la répression en Syrie, suivent avec intérêt le processus de démocratisation en Tunisie, et craignent également un possible isolement de leur pays sur la scène internationale. Comment, dans ces conditions, ne pas croire à un changement démocratique en Algérie? »

Je ne vais pas lui livrer toutes mes cartes et toutes mes connaissances sur un pays que j’ai honorablement servi et loyalement critiqué mais dire au public français : attention les nostalgiques de l’Algérie française vous invitent à une aventure qui va vous couter cher ! Je m’explique sans rentrer dans les détails que vos spécialistes connaissent mais que votre actuel gouvernement belliqueux peut ignorer pour des considérations électorales ou de géostratégie ( le front atlantiste et le front sioniste) :

- Ce n’est plus le même personnel militaire qui dirige l’Algérie. Les seconds couteaux qui ont mené la lutte antiterroriste se considèrent comme légitimes et comme les Messies Sauveurs de l’Algérie. Vous avez créé les conditions politiques et géopolitiques pour qu’il y ait une guerre civile en Algérie. Ces Militaires ont maté les Algériens et tout particulièrement les Maquis islamiques ou pseudo islamiques. Ils se considèrent comme les véritables détenteurs du pouvoir réel et comme les plus méritants à user de la rente de l’Algérie. Qui touchera à leurs privilèges se mordra les dents car ils sont aguerris à mener de longues opérations militaires sans pitié.

- La mentalité du régime algérien vous échappe. La France et les lobbies pro français en Algérie pensent que les décideurs algériens sont inféodés à la France alors qu’ils ne sont inféodés qu’à leur logique interne : la survie de la meute et le maintien de l’Algérie sous chasse gardée privée. La France a été un auxiliaire et non le donneur d’ordres. Quand les décideurs algériens ont liquidé les réseaux islamiques ils se sont tournés vers un autre auxiliaire : les États-Unis. Ces derniers ont raflé toutes les mises stratégiques. Quand les États-Unis ont voulu imposer leur agenda les Algériens se sont tournés vers les Russes et les Chinois.

- La culture politique algérienne, après la force, est la corruption. Elle a commencé par corrompre tous les laïcs qui ont vécu à l’ombre de la rente dans le service public et les as laissé divaguer dans leurs journaux.

- Les Algériens ont développé un réseau de clientélisme et de corruption en France par l’intermédiaire des laïcs éradicateurs qui le moment venu sont obligés de défendre le régime algérien que de prendre le risque de tout perdre. Ils n’ont pas d’idéal mais des intérêts. Les intérêts liés à la corruption entre l’Algérie et la France vont entrer en jeu lorsque le conflit monte au degré intenable

- Les Algériens disposent de cellules nés du FLN et de l’amicale des Algériens en France capables de mobiliser l’émigration musulmane et de mener une lutte sociale, politique, religieuse et armée en France. Tout le drame des jeunes nés de parents algériens en France est la hantise des Français de le voir se retourner contre eux. Cette hantise tient davantage à l’esprit revanchard et nostalgique de la guerre d’Algérie que des Algériens. Les Français ont semé le vent les décideurs algériens peuvent produire la tempête quand ils le veulent.

- Le peuple algérien est épuisé par deux décennies qui ont le mérite de lui dévoiler la vérité sur ses gouvernants, les opposants et les élites. Il est en stand by. Il attend le retour du Mahdi ou la refondation du mouvement islamique sur une base saine débarrassé des débris de l’incompétence et de l’improvisation.

- La topographie de l’Algérie est complexe ;

- Les Algériens ont pratiqué la France pendant 132 ans de colonisation et 50 ans de post colonisation : ils connaissent son discours, ses actes et ses intentions

Dans mes livres « Le dilemme arabe et les 10 commandements US » et dans « Islamophobie : Deus Machina » j’ai montré le rôle du Qatar dans la récupération de la jeunesse des banlieues et des universitaires en quête de reconnaissance sociale afin de faciliter l’implantation du sionisme dans les banlieues qui n’a jamais peu avoir lieu par le passé; j’ai montré également le rôle que veut jouer le Qatar pour gagner l’opinion d’origine arabe en France dans l’éventualité d’une guerre contre la Syrie, l’Iran et l’Algérie.

Le peuple Algérien a une longue expérience de résistance passive et celui qui l’a pratiqué sait que ce n’est pas un tube digestif ni une foule (Ghachi) mais une intelligence politique qui va exprimer un sursaut de conscience et de vigilance à la lumière des événements de Libye, de Syrie, de Palestine. Il sait que la révolution tunisienne a été confisquée par des arrangements d’appareils avec l’armée tunisienne et les caciques de Bourguiba sous les auspices de la France et des États-Unis. Il attend un sursaut révolutionnaire en Tunisie et une poursuite de la Révolution en Égypte. Le deal passé entre l’armée égyptienne, les Frères Musulmans et la Turquie allié de l’OTAN ne passe pas inaperçu aux algériens qui ont vu les Frères Musulmans étaler leur corruption et leurs alliances contre nature.

Enfin un dernier mot : Benjamin Stora et BHL à l’instar de Sarkosy et des monarchies arabes font de l’intox en prenant leurs désirs pour des réalités. Le temps va nous montrer que l’affaire libyenne n’est qu’à son début et que la braise sous la cendre est comme un Phénix. Le temps va nous montrer que le colonialisme anglais a su atteindre ses objectif au Machrek par son intelligence et sa gestion par vassal interposé alors que le colonialisme français court à sa perte par son arrogance, sa stupidité et son ignorance. Dieu merci. Le temps va nous montrer qui va sortir gagnant de la bataille que vont se livrer les services français et algériens pour le contrôle et l’instrumentalisation de l’Aqmi.

Les peuples libyens, tunisiens et égyptiens eux aussi n’ont pas dit leur dernier mot. Les peuples maghrébins comme leurs gouvernants savent jouer aux dominos. C’est moins raffiné et plus bruyant que le jeu d’échec mais il y a des combinaisons intéressantes pour fermer ou ouvrir le jeu et c’est le seul jeu où il arrive au gagnant de perdre s’il n’a pas joué tous ses dominos. Il n’est pas dit que les armes disponibles en Libye vont aller uniquement en Algérie. Il y a d’autres destinations : Gaza, l’Afghanistan, le Maroc et même la France…

{Dis : « Contemplez ce qu’il y a dans les Cieux et la terre. A quoi serviraient les Signes et les avertissements à des gens qui ne sont pas croyants ? S’attendent-ils à autre chose que comme les jours de ceux qui passèrent avant eux ? Dis : « Attendez, je suis avec vous de ceux qui attendent. »} Younes 101

Le sheykh Ali Benhadj sur les criminels de guerre franco-israeliens et le cas de l'agent juif sioniste francais Khaled Nejjar, (arabise en Nezzar)

Planned war on Iran and the General who said No!

US General Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
US General Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
By Gordon Duff, 
Today, General Dempsey, Chairman of America’s Joint Chiefs of Staff, the man who flew to Tel Aviv and informed Netanyahu that America wanted no part of his scheming against Iran was the subject of an assassination attempt in Afghanistan.


This wasn’t an act of terrorism or Taliban militants. It was a “mob hit” against someone who failed to kiss the feet of Netanyahu. His response was to unleash killers, not a fact for the public but a fact just the same, one the American military knows very well. Netanyahu has a problem with “hubris.”

The culprits, “militants,” managed to escape undetected from the most sophisticatedly defended real estate on earth, the perimeter of Bagam Air Force Base. Lucky for them they attacked at night, a time when America’s 5th generation night vision, ground radar and other detection systems were mysteriously disabled.

The rocket detection systems, early warning blimps with ground penetrating synthetic aperture radar and the continual coverage by UAV drones using infrared detection, $2 billion in technology on this one perimeter alone, cost the plane of America’s top military commander and wounds were sustained by two crew members.

Dempsey had just left Tel Aviv where he told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu the following:

“I may not know about all of [Israel's] capabilities, but I think that it’s a fair characterization to say that they could delay but not destroy Iran’s nuclear capabilities.”

Dempsey then told waiting reporters:

“We compare intelligence, we discuss regional implications, and we’ve admitted to each other that our clocks are turning at different rates, we have to understand the Israelis; they live with a constant suspicion with which we do not have to deal.”

There are those close to President Obama who don’t accept the attack on Dempsey at face value, with a public admission by the Taliban of complicity. Such statements, which would certainly cost dearly in reprisals by the US, are most often found on Internet sites lacking a credible connection to any Islamic source.

To some Americans, the attack appears to be a reprisal against Dempsey who, out of coincidence, cited the motive in his own appraisal of Israel’s judgment, their “constant suspicion.”

News agencies buried the failed attack, knowing Dempsey is hated by Netanyahu and respected by the Taliban as both “truthful and fair.”

Netanyahu longs for the days when General Myers held Dempsey’s job, under Bush (43), both flawed and narcissistic, predictable puppets, the perfect fodder for Netanyahu’s machinations.

Only two weeks ago, Presidential hopeful, Mitt Romney, returned from a trip overseas, coming back to America with $60 million dollars collected in Israel and Britain while accompanied by Casino boss Sheldon Adelson who’s Las Vegas and China organizations have long been reputed to be the center of worldwide organized crime.

The business, gambling, drugs, prostitution, money laundering and now war, is seeking its own president and war on Iran is the only issue driving the American campaign.

Romney, as a state governor, was, if anything, to the “left” of President Obama. Romney’s support of government health care and widespread gun controls run totally opposite to the core constituency of the Republican Party, the weapons lobby and the medical racketeers.

Romney has found, however, that, though it is illegal for any American candidate to accept money overseas, while overseas, from overseas, at home from those who are citizens of other countries, he feels himself above the law, in the sweet and motherly arms of the Israeli controlled American media.

Now drowning in illegal cash, much from London bankers, his most interesting catch was the private dinner he shared with the Tel Aviv “blood diamond” smugglers who donated up to $25 million dollars in one night.

Key to his financial successes is his lifelong history of working closely with organized crime. His investment company, Bain, was funded initially by cash infusion from El Salvador death squads many years ago. These investors are still at his side despite charges of mass murder and corruption.

Bain Capital is Romney’s money laundering and tax avoidance company with thousands of secret bank accounts in “safe havens” around the world, invisible billions, hidden transactions, unseen profits and unseen “clients.”

Now Romney has found the “mother of all causes,” selling the promise of an American war, fought by Americans, financed by Americans, American dead, American blood, American collapse, a war demanded by, not Jews of the world but by organized crime groups operating through Israel’s Likudist party, dominated by the Koch Brothers, American gasoline speculators, Sheldon Adelson, whose reputation would fill volumes and Rupert Murdoch, whose spy organization is now proven to have blackmailed three consecutive British government, well proven, and likely to have been even more successful in the United States, Germany, Canada, Australia and a dozen other nations.

Most embarrassing to both Russia and the United States has been the ability of criminal organizations to secure sanctions against Iran when both nations are burdened by official reports stating with comprehensive clarity that Iran has no nuclear program.

Even more embarrassing for Russia, who refused to veto sanctions as they did with Iran’s ally Syria, is the fact that Iran’s peaceful nuclear program is built, in near entirety on Russian technology, a Russian nuclear reactor and 3000 Russian technicians.

Statements by Obama directly contradict America’s National Intelligence Estimate. The estimate stated that Iran has no nuclear program. Russia’s Putin has similarly ignored, not just his own intelligence agencies but the fact that Russia is actually building Iran’s reactor and has 3000 technicians in Iran, all of whom probably are not entirely deaf and blind.

Obama has no rational claim to ignorance. His behavior is like that of the playground, all the other children are eating dirt, he feels he has to do the same. In this case, however, when known falsehoods likely to end in a destructive war are agreed to out of fear of retaliation by a former furniture salesman (Netanyahu) or gambling boss, the real importance of the presidency comes into doubt.

A problem no one will mention, is the behavior of Putin in Tel Aviv, backing Netanyahu’s claims of Iran’s violation of voluntary agreements based on no facts other than the statements of one of the world best known pathological liars. What does the failed furniture salesman from Philadelphia have on Uncle Vladimir?

Neither leader has dealt with the simple fact, Iran has the right to build anything it wants for any reason it wishes.

Similarly, the United States, under Bush, both withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty of 1972 and withdrew from participation in the International Criminal Court at The Hague.
The latter, the withdrawal from the court, is a veritable admission of complicity in war crimes with key U.S. officials facing indictment and arrest across the globe.

Were one to be honest, the entire Bush administration is under a privileged form of “house arrest” as is Britain’s Tony Blair. All face criminal proceedings and continually make plans to travel but end up cancelling, sometimes out of public outcry for justice or to actually avoid arrest.

Despite his pronouncements, even with an election upcoming and the need to parrot childish threats in order to please the Israeli press a prerequisite, Obama has made it clear he will not attack Iran. It is time the public realizes that by opposing war and running against Romney, an agent of a hostile foreign power and longtime organized crime affiliate, the president and those around him are at great risk.

The carefully choreographed and very public attempt on the life of General Dempsey is a greeting card from the Adelson/Romney/Netanyahu camp.

Several appropriate responses, RSVPs as it were, come to mind, some partially fatal. Is an American president really the leader of the free world, as we so often say, if any “two bit thug” can dictate policy?

Despite that position, Obama controls well over 80% of the Jewish vote in the United States where, as pointed out in an earlier article, studies have shown only 4% of Jewish voters in America feel Iran is any threat to Israel.

A critical part of understanding organized crime requires the study of its origins, particularly in America, during the 19th century.

While London, from the earliest days of what America had believed to be freedom from British rule, in actuality ran America’s economy, and was, itself, subjected to rule by continental bankers.

Britain, the colonizer of the world was, itself, no more than a client of the Bauer/Rothschild group who underwrote the British pound.

The real criminal groups running American politics developed from among the immigrant gangs that settled America’s cities. There were German, Irish, Italian and Jewish gangs. All that survive now are the remnants of the Mafia, the Jewish gangs who now run Washington and Wall Street and the new threats from Kosovo and Albania, the latest round of criminal immigration into America.

With the full cooperation of FBI Director Hoover, tasked with protecting America from criminal organizations, the government stood aside while every aspect of American life, every necessity from water to electricity to medicine, leaving nothing out, came under assault by criminal groups grown fat on profiteering from war, narcotics and, during the Prohibition years, the sale of illegal alcohol.

For decades, America’s media has been tasked with blaming all ills on Italian Americans and corrupt trade unions while America has been little but a colony of key European banking families who created wars, suppressed technologies, manipulated currencies, raised and crushed stock markets and national economies and, in the end, became as a hydra, the multi-headed beast of Greek mythology, ruling all.

What drew Adelson, Romney and even Putin to Israel at this critical time as the world sits on the brink of nuclear war over Syria is simple. We are again reminded of Putin’s visit to Israel.

No Israeli citizen was spoken to, no public concerns were addressed, no, a visit to Israel is a visit to the “safe haven” for worldwide organized crime that controls and manages the vast and endless wealth of the Russian continent as easily as it runs Britain or dances its Washingtonian puppets into discarding laws and traditions and becoming a surrogate bully, not for a nation but for an international criminal conspiracy.

The language of politics must be replaced with the language of crime as the solutions to what are misconstrued as political problems are and have long been responses to the depredations of criminal organizations.

It isn’t as though Iran were the only target, simply the public target where control of the United Nations Security Council can be exercised, a demonstration of the raw power of evil.

The mistake made by so many is to use principles of geopolitics to describe the world condition, the continual entropy, the centralization of wealth and the rapid deterioration of human rights as wars rage without end.

Even the educated classes, searching for patterns and rationales to explain how 2000 trillion dollars represented by “derivative debt” could encumber all the world’s currencies, a staggering amount created by an unseen hand through a process none have yet been able to describe.

Debt, or as it is known in criminal circles as “loan sharking,” is the business of the world. Controlling currencies was not enough, thus controlled governments, bribed, threatened, blackmailed and bought looked away while the wealth and hope of a hundred generations was stolen overnight, a few lines of text, a few entries on computers and generations of our progeny are changed, in that moment, from citizens of the world to “useless eaters,” as Henry Kissinger would describe them.

Armies may march, air forces may bomb, drones may attack but none of this is war or politics, nor has it been for centuries. This is where we went awry. We chose to play chess while our opponents simply put a pistol on the table and emptied our pockets.

America is living this today, as it looks on an upcoming election. The very few can escape the packaged news, scripted in Hollywood or Washington or Tel Aviv, our political life is a theatrical production, a comic tragedy without the Shakespearean irony.

This is a government that Sheldon Adelson, the man who believes he will be America’s real next president, believes he can take to war, a systematic conquest of the Middle East and Central Asia, done for the criminal elements some call Israel, done, quite simply, to prove the power of evil over good.

GF/JR

1 comments:


Anon said...
Interesting!

- aangirfan

La sainte ville d’Al-Quds transformée en géante caserne militaire !


Al-Quds occupée – CPI,
www.palestine-info.info



Les colonies sionistes perturbent de plus en plus les montagnes de la sainte ville d’Al-Quds. Le mur de séparation discriminatoire trouble ses vallées et serpente entre les maisons et les quartiers palestiniens. Les cyprès et les pins ne décorent plus les rues : elles sont désormais entourées de barbelés et de caméras de surveillance électronique. C’est le destin de la sainte ville depuis qu’elle est sous occupation. Elle a désormais l’air d’une caserne militaire encerclée par les occupants sionistes, leurs soldats et leurs armements, de partout.

Planification systématique

La transformation de la ville occupée d’Al-Quds en une caserne militaire ne se fait pas sans arrière-pensée ; c’est une politique sioniste bien planifiée destinée à chasser ses habitants natifs, à la judaïser et à y réaliser toutes les revendications des Juifs.

Dr. Jamal Omar est expert en colonisation. Il dit à notre Centre Palestinien d’Information (CPI) que les occupants sionistes appliquent une politique sécuritaire spéciale dans la ville d'Al-Quds et continuent à bâtir des casernes et des colonies, dans le dessein d’une mainmise totale sur la ville, de chasser ses habitants.

Les sionistes construisent leurs colonies l’une à côté de l’autre, de façon compacte, empêchant tout élargissement palestinien, souligne l’expert.

Des zones vertes

En outre, ajoute Omar, les occupants sionistes ne se suffisent pas de construire des colonies. Ils mettent aussi la main sur de larges terrains autour d’elles, les appelant de zones vertes et interdisant les Palestiniens de les approcher.

Et pour assurer des rues spéciales à leurs colons, les occupants sionistes ont ouvert des rues qui ont volé des milliers d’hectares de terrains aux Palestiniens, ajoute l’expert. Puis il y a toutes ces caméras de surveillance, des barrages militaires, permanents ou non, qui gâchent la vie des Palestiniens, jour et nuit.

Les facultés militaires

Khalil Al-Tof est un autre expert en colonisation. Il dit à notre Centre Palestinien d’Information (CPI) que les occupants sionistes construisent des casernes militaires à l’intérieur de la ville, délibérément, ainsi que des bâtiments et des facultés militaires.

L’expert indique que les occupants sionistes ont mis en place, en 1970, la direction de la région du Centre, dans le village de Beit Hanina. L’hôpital jordanien a été donné à la direction de la police sioniste. Sur la montagne d’Az-Zaytoun, ils ont installé une caserne pour contrôler la vallée du Jourdain.

La direction de l’état-major de l’armée de l’occupation sioniste planifie la construction d’une faculté militaire. Cette construction vise, souligne l’expert Al-Tofkaji, deux objectifs. Le premier est civil, disant que la ville d'Al-Quds est la capitale de tous les Juifs du monde entier. Le deuxième est religieux, pour dire que la ville n’appartient qu’à l’entité sioniste.

Finalement, l’expert ajoute que le serment de l’état-major sera mené dans des zones surplombant le Dôme du Rocher, une façon de dire qu’il fait partie de leur histoire, qu’il est le lieu de leur prétendu "Troisième temple".

Lakhdar Brahimi, a zionist freemason, working for the international zionist jewry in Washington from Kissinger to Brzezinsky. Brahimi is deeply tied to the french-israeli services in Paris, controlling the Algerian army, he played a major role in overthrowing the newly elected Islamic Front of Salvation in 1991, provoking a civil war that led to the death of at least 550 000, and 60 000 missing, millions of refugees. He is a war criminal like his zionist jewish masters

Lakhdar Brahimi: aiding repression at home and conflict fighting abroad

 Lakhdar Brahimi's daughter Reem (also spelled Rym), who was a CNN Correspondent in Baghdad during the 2003 Iraq american-israeli invasion, is married to Prince Ali of Jordan, brother of the Anglo-Sefardim  king, put in place by the mossad in Amman. 

 


By Zakaria Lamine,

With his debonair look, soft-spoken manner and avuncular smile, Lakhdar Brahimi seems to exude wisdom, innocence and deep concern for the wretched of this earth. His mediating skills in finding solutions to the problems that had affected Lebanon, Haiti, Afghanistan and Iraq are acclaimed worldwide. His record may indeed be outstanding. We leave the assessment of the outcome of his mediation efforts to the Lebanese, the Haitian, the Afghan and the Iraqi. In the same manner we cannot judge the record of Kofi Annan in the light of his failure to make progress in the resolution of the Syrian crisis. We leave the assessment of the man and his record of achievements to the Ghanaians, who undoubtedly know more about him than non-Ghanaians. We will follow this truism and look at Lakhdar Brahimi from an Algerian perspective and find out whether the Elder, hailed by the international community as a skilful conflict fighter, is fit for purpose. His appointment as UN and Arab League envoy to Syria may have dire consequences for the appalling suffering of the Syrians who are heavily bleeding and whose towns and village are being systematically destroyed.

Algeria can be said to have been there first when it comes to the Arab Spring. In December 1991, the Algerians voted in the first free and fair elections ever to be held in Algeria for an opposition party to signify their rejection of the corrupt security system, called the Algerian state, woven in place by successive military coups and an inflation of security services vying with each for the subjugation of the Algerians. The security system cancelled the elections, dismissed the elected president of the country and imposed its will on the people. A High Security Council was created to fill the vacuum left by the dismissal of the president. The members of this institution were selected from the most loyal and illustrious members of the Algerian establishment. The roll call goes like this: Sid Ahmed Ghozali (Prime Minister), Lakhdar Brahimi (Foreign Affairs Minister), Hamdani Benkhelli (Justice Minister), Khaled Nezzar (Defence Minister), Larbi Belkheir (Interior Minister) and Abdelmalek Guenaizia (Chief of Staff). The Council took decisions which were to open the gates of hell on Algerian society. As for the presence of Lakhdar Brahimi in this Council, we leave it to Lounis Aggoun and Jean-Baptiste Rivoire to explain it away (1): “As for foreign affairs, a seasoned diplomat like Lakhdar Brahimi is required to convince international opinion of the so-called “legality” of the change of government.” Our Elder shuttled the world and spared no effort in selling the policies of the murderous Algerian junta to all and sundry. He had fulfilled this task to the best of his abilities until February 1993.

Digging the past of Lakhdar Brahimi is no joy to Algerians. If he had simply faded away to ruminate his achievements and sleep on the laurels he had collected for his achievements in international diplomacy we would not have had the urge to remind ourselves of his past actions in the service of oppression and the apology of crimes against humanity. It pains many Algerians to see these relics, who had served and aided oppression at home, displaying on the world stage contrived wisdom and concern for the wretched. His sight reminds us of the hundreds of thousands of Algerians killed by the Algerian junta which Lakhdar Brahimi had served as foreign minister from 1992 to 1993. His appearance on television screens resurrects in us painful memories of thousands of disappeared whose relatives cannot find the closure required because of the absence of a grave to visit. Is the task of elucidating the fate of 20 000 disappeared in Algeria beneath the qualifications of the Elder Lakhdar Brahimi? Can he not use his international aura to help those mothers who keep weekly vigils in the squares of Algiers, undeterred by barrages of aggressive and scornful baton-wielding and heavily armed police officers, in search of answers to disappeared loved ones? Can he not remind the president of Algeria Abdelaziz Bouteflika that it is not decent to shrug off the plight of these mothers by telling them that their sons were not in his pocket? Can he not find some inner strength to apologise to the Algerians for his association with mass murderers and torturers?

The yearning for natural justice is a universal feeling. Natural justice dictates that actors and apologists of oppression and human rights abuses should not be entrusted to resolve conflicts because their instinct is not on the side of justice and human rights. Lakhdar Brahimi had aided and abetted a murderous regime in his home country. How can he be trusted by the Syrians to deliver them from the murderous and sectarian regime of Bashar al-Assad who is killing his people with the connivance of Russia, China, Hezbollah, Iran and others like Algeria? Bashar al-Assad is waging a war with heavy weapons and warplanes against the cities of Syria, the cradle of human civilisation. He claims to fight fundamentalists and armed gangs. How similar is this rhetoric to that deployed by the Algerian junta when it trampled on the will of the Algerians in January 1992 with the then blessing of our Elder Lakhdar Brahimi.

Lamine Zakaria
23 August 2012

Note de référence :
1. Lounis Aggoun et Jean-Baptiste Rivoire, in Françalgérie, crimes et mensonges d'États. Histoire secrète, de la guerre d'indépendance à la « troisième guerre » d'Algérie , La Découverte, Paris, 2004, http://www.algeria-watch.org

http://www.hoggar.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3332:lakhdar-brahimi-aiding-repression-at-home-and-conflict-fighting-abroad&catid=112:zakaria-lamine&Itemid=36

The coming fall of the French-Israeli-Algerian Zionist Jews will provoke a war in France. Sarkozy tried to maintain the israeli domination over the Algerian military apparatus (DRS) but failed to start a civil war in Toulouse with 'Operation Merah'. French-Israeli are in control of the fake 'jihadis' groups such as GIA-AQIM (created by the DST-DCRI), MUJAO (driven by the french DGSE), while the pentagon has full control over the Ansar Deen leader, Iyad Ag Ghaly, a malian linked to the qataris and saudis, and a good part of Boko Haram with the British MI5-6

The Ugly Truth about Algeria

Despite not really being in the news, Algeria still appears in the Western media intermittently. As the Maghreb’s last dictatorship, the recent wave of regime change and democratization has passed this important country by, at least so far. Algeria is the key state in Northwest Africa—by virtue of its size, position, natural wealth and regional influence—yet has missed out on the trend that has overtaken so much of the Arab world for the past two years. It remains notable that Algeria’s bloody civil war, which began twenty years ago, never really ended. And now with the help of Al Qaeda, the conflict may be spreading across the Sahel region.

Events in Algeria have long been underreported in the U.S. and Western media (with the exception of France), and there is a general lack of understanding of what ails the country. Certainly the terrible fratricide there in the 1990s got little coverage in Western media, despite the fact that it probably claimed twice as many lives as the Bosnian conflict, which ran concurrently and received nonstop Western attention.

Algeria’s nightmare years of 1993–1997 were a focus of the international human-rights community, which correctly pointed out that the conduct of the government was hardly better than that of Islamist terrorists trying to take over the country. But since 9/11, the Algerian narrative has been subsumed into the West’s counterterrorism effort, to the extent it is reported at all. Enormous poverty, inequality, and the regime’s rapacious and brutal conduct get little attention from Western experts, who seem more interested in speculating about potential Al Qaeda attacks in the Maghreb.

The Real Story

The official story is straightforward. Two decades ago, the military-led junta, which had governed the country since independence from France in 1962, cancelled a democratic election that likely would have brought Islamists to power, and mujahidin took up arms against the secular regime. By 1993, the supremely violent Armed Islamic Group (GIA) emerged as the implacable foe of the regime and the local Al Qaeda affiliate. Although GIA was not the only Islamist resistance group in the country, it was unquestionably the bloodiest. It conducted brutal attacks not just in Algeria but in Europe as well, including a wave of bombings in Paris in the summer of 1995, remembered by terrorism gurus as Al Qaeda’s first attacks on the West. Failing to achieve victory, GIA fell into mass murder, slaughtering Algerian civilians by the hundreds, causing Al Qaeda to break ties with the group in early 1997. Largely killed off by the Algerian security forces, by 1998 the remnants of GIA had coalesced into the GSPC, a far smaller group which posed no serious threat to the regime and spent most of its time on kidnappings and robberies.

In 2006, after almost a decade hiatus, Al Qaeda reinitiated Algerian mujahidin into its ranks, renaming the local franchise Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM). While AQIM has been more active in terrorism than the GSPC, it also seems more like an armed gang than a bona fide jihadist group. Over the last few years, AQIM’s reach has extended across the Maghreb and into the Sahel, leading some jihad-watchers to posit that it constitutes a threat to the region, a view shared by many in the U.S. government.

While this account is not entirely inaccurate, it leaves out so many important details as to be essentially false. Above all, it omits the role of the Algerian regime in counterterrorism, which has been effective at defeating the jihad even though its methods would make most Westerners shudder. The lead agency in the fight against the Algerian mujahidin has been the country’s military intelligence service, the feared DRS. With a reputation for ruthlessness and efficiency second to none in the Arab world, the DRS is arguably the world’s most effective intelligence service when it comes to fighting Al Qaeda; it is also probably the most cold-blooded. The DRS can be considered the backbone of the military-led junta. General Mohamed Mediene has headed the DRS since 1990, making him the longest-serving intelligence boss in world history—and few doubt that he is the most powerful man in the country.

Trained by the KGB and schooled in the hard fight for independence, Algerian spies have used tactics against homegrown extremists reminiscent of a sinister B-grade movie. Several high-ranking DRS officers have explained what they did to defeat the mujahidin, including violating human rights on an industrial scale, but hardly anyone outside France seems to have noticed.

Simply put, GIA was the creation of the DRS; using proven Soviet methods of penetration and provocation, the agency assembled it to discredit the extremists. Much of GIA’s leadership consisted of DRS agents, who drove the group into the dead end of mass murder, a ruthless tactic that thoroughly discredited GIA Islamists among nearly all Algerians. Most of its major operations were the handiwork of the DRS, including the 1995 wave of bombings in France. Some of the most notorious massacres of civilians were perpetrated by military special units masquerading as mujahidin, or by GIA squads under DRS control. Having driven GIA into the ground by the late 1990s, DRS has continued to infiltrate and influence Islamist groups in the country. To what extent the local Al Qaeda affiliate is secretly controlled by the military—as GIA and GSPC were—is an open question, but its recent record suggests that DRS influence over any Algerian extremist group is considerable.

U.S. Intel Failure?

These realities, understood by Algerians, are little known in the West, particularly in the United States. While French senior officials have hinted they have been wise to DRS games for many years, a similar understanding seems altogether lacking in the Pentagon or the U.S. intelligence community, which have partnered with Algeria in the fight against Al Qaeda since the 1990s. Whether they really are ignorant or simply do not want to know the sordid details is an open and important question.

To be fair to those inside the Beltway, outside “terrorism experts” are just as credulous about Algeria’s “official story,” and an entire subindustry has arisen in recent years that seeks to explain Algeria and its violent homegrown jihad without any reference to basic realities inside the country.

Yet Algeria’s neighbors, who fear the country’s outsized influence in Northwest Africa, are appropriately skeptical of the Algiers-created narrative that portrays AQIM as a major threat to regional stability. They reject the idea that extremists can be combated only by greater Algerian involvement in regional affairs that is implicitly supported by the United States. African officials are known to drop unsubtle hints that AQIM is not quite what it seems to be and ought to be viewed within the broader context of Algerian foreign policy. In one of the rare cases where such doubts were aired openly, Mali’s head of state security, who is charged with keeping Algerian mujahidin out of his country, told the press in June 2009 that “at the heart of AQIM is the DRS.” Shortly thereafter, he was shot dead at home by “unknown gunmen.”

U.S. interest in the Sahel has only grown in recent years, roughly in tandem with the alleged rise of AQIM in the region. It is no coincidence that the U.S. Army is aligning a combat brigade with U.S. Africa Command—which heretofore has had no combat units permanently assigned to it—and the Pentagon’s interest in the region is rising fast. “Terrorist elements around the world go to the areas they think has the least resistance,” explained army chief of staff General Ray Odierno, “and right now, you could argue that’s Africa.”

While Al Qaeda unquestionably has a great deal of interest in the Maghreb, and would surely like to see the Algerian junta fall and be replaced by a Salafi regime bent on rebuilding the imaginary caliphate, the chances of this outcome are virtually nil. DRS methods, plus the usual extremist tone-deafness, have successfully soured the vast majority of Algerians on the jihadist message. While most Algerians want an end to what they simply call le pouvoir (“the power”), the corrupt military elite that has run the country since France left in 1962, few pine for any sort of Islamist dictatorship.

Unsolved Mystery

Last weekend, Algeria celebrated fifty years of independence. But for most Algerians, buffeted by poverty, instability, corruption and war, there is little to celebrate. Mid-May parliamentary elections resulted in a surprising win for the junta, leading to accusations of fraud as well as despair for those hoping for change via the ballot box. It is clear that the military has no intention to bowing to any sort of peaceful regime change, but infighting among the elite may undo the system. When the junta falls, as someday it surely will, the change will rock those who have waged Algeria’s dirty war against terrorism. The effects on the junta’s foreign supporters, who have turned a blind eye to massive human-rights abuses in the name of counterterrorism, will be serious too.

It is time for the U.S. government to follow the lead of human-rights groups: Washington should start asking important questions about what Algiers has really been up to since 1992, and to what extent the junta and the DRS have been engaged in mass repression and state terrorism under the guise of fighting Al Qaeda—all possibly with U.S. assistance. The saga of Algeria over the last twenty years constitutes “one big murder mystery,” said one of the few writers in the Anglosphere to take notice. It’s time to get to the bottom of it.

John R. Schindler is professor of national-security affairs at the U.S. Naval War College as well as chair of the Partnership for Peace’s Combating Terrorism Working Group. He is a former counterintelligence officer with the National Security Agency. The views expressed here are entirely his own.

Image: Magharebia

4 comments:


BASHEER AHMAD said...
WAR IN FRANCE?

“John R. Schindler ... Combating Terrorism..."

As such, John R. Schindler is immediately disqualified and cannot be trusted to write the WHOLE truth about Algeria or any Muslim country. As a professor, he must be an idiot to use such terms as “Islamist terrorists”, “Islamist dictatorship”, etc., because these exist only in the minds and propaganda book of the imperialist West. As soon as any author starts using other terms other than the proper term MUSLIM, I just keep away from him! There is no such thing as a “MUSLIM TERRORIST”!

I am sure Schindler is convinced, like all the other fools that Muslims carried out the implosions of 11 September 2001 despite the fact that SIX MILLION EXPERTS have already proven that Israel and the US establishment carried them out!

I would agree with him however when he says that Algeria suffers from “Enormous poverty, inequality” and that the regime is RAPACIOUS and BRUTAL and that “GIA was the creation of the DRS !”

“Most of its (GIA’S – GROUPE ISRAËL ARMÉE or ARMED ISRAEL GROUP) major operations were the handiwork of the DRS, including the 1995 wave of bombings in France. Some of the most notorious massacres of civilians were perpetrated by military special units masquerading as mujahidin, or by GIA squads under DRS control.”

These are correct statements as they have been fully documented. To have been able to spawn such a killing machine like the GIA within Algeria itself proves how degenerates the Muslims of Algeria had become thanks to their adoption of the FRENCH WAY OF LIFE, THAT OF SATAN HIMSELF, DIIN AS SHAYTAAN, AND ITS FASCIST AND RACIST LAÏCITÉ!

BAFS
BASHEER AHMAD said...
(continued)

I wish however and hope that The French-Israeli-Algerian Jews will fall, but unfortunately I have not yet come across any evidence about this providential miracle! I do not wish any country to be stricken by war, but I moat heartedly welcome the idea of war coming to France. Non content of their treacherous and murderous past during the Crusades, the Inquisition, the Slave Trade, and other wars, the French military backed by the French intelligentsia, Churches, bank gangsters, corporations, mainstream media, academia, and Jehovah or Yahweh, has been mass murdering defenceless people around the world, in Indo-China, Africa, the Arab and Muslim countries and now with the Jews in total control of the French Fascist and Totalitarian Regime, they are preparing for more ritual sacrifice to their blood-thirsty Gods. Therefore, THE LAW OF KARMA WILL (HAVE TO) APPLY!

The Israeli and Jewish domination over the Algerian Military Machine started already with the end of the useless Algerian Revolution when the Muslims were defeated and their country taken hostage by France. There was no Nuremberg trial for French mass murderers, rapists, torturers, sodomites, and racists because Muslims were and are still regarded as inferior to Jews and to all other people on earth!

I see no evidence that the French and the Zionists intended to start a Civil War with OPERATION MERAH. If that was the case, the Civil War would have happened! It is well documented that the West and Israel are in total control of all the FAKE “JIHADIS” talked about in the Western Press on a daily basis. The “MUJAHEDIN” E KHALQ, GIA, and others, all the creation of the CIA, MOSSAD, DST-DGSE, MI5-MI6, etc.

As for the ANSAR DEEN and BOKO HARAM, I need to do more research. But, I would tend to trust the author that they too are controlled by US-UK intelligence and military.

I met an Algerian ‘Muslim’ in London during Ramadaan, who was praising “British democracy” and saying that everything is going on well in Algeria. “We know the government is corrupt, but we are free to do whatever we want!” And, he was very happy about it. What he does not realise is that he is and his parents and grand parents were the Survivors of the Third Algerian Holocaust of the 1910s carried by France and the Jews in their land.

We cannot blame the West however for not reporting the extent of the blood bath that has occurred in Algeria some twenty years ago, but only the Algerians who are so backward that they do not know what to do with their lives. It was and still up to them to tell the whole world the REAL TRUTH ABOUT ALGERIA. Just like it is up to the Muslims to tell the world about what is really happening in OCCUPIED ARABIA! Algeria has never ceased to be under French occupation and has produced bastards and retards by the millions to such an extent that, financed and supported by the French and the Jews, they kill each other and feel no guilt at all about it!

I am sorry, but John R. Schindler is just another piece of shit who did not name the real guilty parties behind the Third Algerian Holocaust and the ongoing assassinations, executions, and murder of civilians – the Jews, the French, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, with UN complicity, of course!

BAFS
BASHEER AHMAD said...
PART 1

“John R. Schindler is professor of national-security affairs at the U.S. Naval War College as well as chair of the Partnership for Peace’s Combating Terrorism Working Group. He is a former counterintelligence officer with the National Security Agency. The views expressed here are entirely his own.”

As such, John R. Schindler is immediately disqualified and cannot be trusted to write the WHOLE truth about Algeria or any Muslim country. As a professor, he must be an idiot to use such terms as “Islamist terrorists”, “Islamist dictatorship”, etc., because these exist only in the minds and propaganda book of the imperialist West. As soon as any author starts using other terms other than the proper term MUSLIM, I just keep away from him! There is no such thing as a “MUSLIM TERRORIST”!

I am sure Schindler is convinced, like all the other fools that Muslims carried out the implosions of 11 September 2001 despite the fact that SIX MILLION EXPERTS have already proven that Israel and the US establishment carried them out!

I would agree with him however when he says that Algeria suffers from “Enormous poverty, inequality” and that the regime is RAPACIOUS and BRUTAL and that “GIA was the creation of the DRS !”

“Most of its (GIA’S – GROUPE ISRAËL ARMÉE or ARMED ISRAEL GROUP) major operations were the handiwork of the DRS, including the 1995 wave of bombings in France. Some of the most notorious massacres of civilians were perpetrated by military special units masquerading as mujahidin, or by GIA squads under DRS control.”

These are correct statements as they have been fully documented. To have been able to spawn such a killing machine like the GIA within Algeria itself proves how degenerates the Muslims of Algeria had become thanks to their adoption of the FRENCH WAY OF LIFE, THAT OF SATAN HIMSELF, DIIN AS SHAYTAAN, AND ITS FASCIST AND RACIST LAÏCITÉ!

(to be continued)
Melinda said...
Anyone who trusts anyone from the NSA is foolish. John Schindler is a complete dumb ass fraud. He got busted sexting with a woman. He sent a pic of his soft dick via twitter. Who in their right mind would trust an idiot like this with National security? He's a loser of the highest magnitude.

US rewarding Myanmar for massacring Muslims


By Kevin Barrett, 

Dear American Buddhist brothers and sisters,

I am writing to every contact listed at Buddhanet.info’s American Buddhist Directory to ask:
Are you aware of the ongoing genocide in Myanmar (Burma) -- a genocide that is being committed in the name of Buddhism?

And did you know that the United States of America bears responsibility for this genocide, since the US has been rewarding the Myanmar regime with ever-closer political and economic ties during recent months of accelerating atrocities?


As American Buddhists, you are in a position to help stop this genocide, by pressuring the US and Myanmar governments as well as international human rights organizations. Your visible participation in the campaign to save the Rohingya people from extermination by murderous Buddhist fanatics will not only help draw the world’s attention to this horrific situation, but also help restore the image of Buddhism as a religion of compassion.
The facts about the genocide in Myanmar are not in dispute. The fanatical Buddhist nationalists, who unfortunately represent a large segment of the roughly 60 million Buddhists in Myanmar, admit that they are trying to uproot and exterminate the roughly one million Muslim Rohingya from land that the Rohingya have lived on for centuries.
Here is what a typical genocidal Buddhist fanatic from Myanmar wrote in a comment on a Wall Street Journal article:
“Burma is Buddhist nation created for the 135 Tibeto-Burman tribes. People do not get citizenship just because born there or illegally lived there for centuries. Please do not interfere with the law and internal affairs of Burma just as you do not like other nations to poke their nose in your internal affairs.”
“People do not get citizenship just because born there or illegally lived there for centuries.” This statement, which aptly sums up the official policy of the Burmese regime, could get the person who made it, and the government that follows it, hanged for crimes against humanity. Obviously, being born in a modern nation to a family that has been there for centuries automatically confers citizenship. And obviously, any modern nation that denies citizenship to such people, burns their homes and communities, and murders them en masse, with the aim of removing them from the nation of their birth, is committing the internationally-recognized crime of genocide.
In recent weeks, many thousands of homes, and more than 20 mosques, have been burned by murderous Buddhist mobs, backed by national security forces, in the Arakan state of Myanmar. Estimates of the number of Rohingya Muslims murdered, whether directly or by drowning in the Naf River, as they flee the killers, range from the thousands to the tens of thousands. Every one of the more than 500 mosques in Arakan has been taken over by the genocidal regime’s security forces and shut down, and they are being demolished one-by-one. (This happened during the holy month of Ramadan, when Muslims are supposed to spend as much time as possible in a mosque.)

Muslims have been living in Burma since roughly 800 c.e. -- that is, nearly for as long as the religion of Islam has existed. And Arakan has been a Muslim region, ruled by Muslim kings and/or populated by Bengali Muslims, since 1430. The most notable population increase of Muslims in Arakan took place in the 1600s. The idea that the Rohingya people are somehow “recent immigrants” to the region is clinically insane -- a symptom of the larger insanity known as nationalist fanaticism.”

Both Buddhism and Islam are universalist religions: They proclaim truths that are valid for all people, indeed for all of existence. And the core truth that both religions proclaim is the primacy of compassion. In Buddhism, a central feature of the Buddha nature is compassion for all beings. If one were to choose a single hallmark of a successful advanced practitioner of Buddhism, it would be a highly-developed sense of compassion.
Whatever has happened to the Myanmar Buddhists’ compassion for their fellow citizens who happen to be born as Rohingyas?
Islam, too, views compassion as a central reality of creation. Muslim theologians, like the more advanced Christian and Jewish religious thinkers, view God as ineffable; but the primary and overriding tangible characteristic of God in Islam (with the proviso that no tangible characteristics fully express the reality of the one ineffable God) is rahma, or compassion. The two adjectives Muslims use the most to “describe” God are ar-rahman ar-rahim, usually translated as “the merciful, the compassionate.” (The root of rahma and its cognates derives from the word for “womb,” suggesting that this “compassion” has something in common with the nurturing, all-embracing, unconditional love that mothers feel for their children.)
Additionally, both Buddhism and Islam teach us to transcend or even annihilate the (tribal) ego. Buddhism offers a set of teachings that take its practitioners beyond the ego, which is the source of the endless desire that is the cause of the pervasive suffering or disappointment that characterizes ordinary human existence. Likewise, Islam teaches its serious practitioners to annihilate the “ego that desires evil” through absolute submission to God. Each religion offers a very similar cure for the unhappiness of the ordinary human condition.
The kind of chest-thumping egotistical nationalism that proclaims “I am a Buddhist, my heroic nation is Buddhist, I am so much better than those non-Buddhists that I must kill them or exile them” is about as far from the compassionate teachings of the Buddha as it is possible to get. Likewise, extremist Muslims who proclaim that their narrow version of Islam is the only truth, and that everyone who disagrees should be killed, are equally far from the universal, all-compassionate message proclaimed by God through Prophet Muhammad (peace upon him).
Muslims and Buddhists ought to unite against ego-driven nationalist fanaticism, which is an affront to both religious traditions. A good starting point would be joining forces against the genocide in Myanmar. Below are some suggestions for action.
Suggestions for action:
1. Write and call Myanmar’s government contacts pointing out that every modern nation agrees that anyone born inside a nation, whose parents and ancestors also lived on that territory, is automatically a citizen of that nation and must be protected by that nation's government.
2. Contact Amnesty International’s International Secretariat and Amnesty International USA to demand that they issue an Appeal for Action to save the Rohingya people.
3. Contact Human Rights Watch to thank them for their attempts to bring attention to the plight of the Rohingya, and ask them to do more.
4. Contact the Center for Justice and Accountability to ask that they seek the prosecution of Myanmar leaders for genocide.
5. Contact The Carter Center to suggest that Jimmy Carter attempt to visit Arakan to bring humanitarian relief and stop the genocide.
6. Contact the Genocide Intervention Network and ask them to accelerate their efforts to stop the genocide in Myanmar.
7. Contact the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, the UNHCR Refugee Agency, and the UNHCR Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide to demand an end to the genocide in Myanmar.
8. Contact your congressional representative and ask him or her to introduce legislation to pressure the Myanmar junta to stop the genocide.
KB/HSN/JR

Revealed secret israeli plan to take full control of the MENA-SCAR regions under the 'Great Middle East' and 'European Neighborhood policy'. This plan is directed against the Arab-Berberian-Touareg-Zwei, peoples and not the governments, which are all including, Libya, Tunisia, Syria, Saudis, Qataris, Emirates, Oman, Jordan, Morocco and Algeria, are all playing a multi-level game, accomplices in the zionist plan, under the fake 'Arab Spring' and 'Terrorism'.

A clarification : As Muslims we do not make the confusion between the real Mujahideens, fighting to gain absolute sovereignty and total control of their wealths, lands, fighting against the oppressors and zionist imperialists and the Contras-Mercenaries, financed and armed by the israelis and their lackeys in Washington, London, Paris, Berlin, Doha and Ryadh, Algiers, Ankara or Tripoli and Damascus.

ISLAAM forbids any kind of alliance with enemies killing, occupying Muslim lands or puppets that were put in place by the enemy like the Gaddafas, the Al Assad, the Sauds, the Al Khalifah, the Nahyane, the Al Sabah or any other sell-out to the enemy, Russian and Chinese included.  While there is in the 'alternative media' a deliberate and maintained confusion about the 'Islamic Resistance' and her different Muslim groups fighting to liberate their countries from the occupation, and the Contras-Mercenaries or fake 'Islamic groups', all created by the West, under NATO-israel command, trained and armed by the Pentagon, the British MOD, the French-Israelis, the German and even the Russians in the Caucasus and Chinese in Central Asia, which aim is to channelize the military efforts for their geo-economical interests and gain, leaving the Muslims orphans of their own wealths and lands in the enemy hands. Muslims are not fighting under the old puppets banners, nor the new puppets banners, the Zionists in France, UK, US, Germany try to place in the Arab world under the 'Arab Spring' to guaranty Israel's domination. Israel wants civil wars every where in the West under, Islamophobia orchestrated by the US and European governments and agencies, and an internal Muslim warfare, sunnis-shias wars, or Muslim-Christian wars in South of Europe, 'clash of civilizations'.

There are genuine and authentically Muslim Resistance groups, which defeated militarily the US and NATO already in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Yemen, Somalia, the enemy is trying to discredit them by creating 'fake groups' to organize a counter-revolution, slaughtering innocents, creating civil wars among Muslims, balkanizing all the MENA, SCAR, Caspian regions, to give Israel a military advantage when they will blitzkrieg the Middle East. We can tell that the Libyan and Syrian people, and 90% of the Muslim peoples from Mauritania to Indonesia, know perfectly these facts and they are only on stand-by waiting for their Hour to smash the Zionist plans. Time will tell very soon insha Allah if the fake groups under Israel command are defeated, but the Seal of the Prophet Muhammad, saws, explained 1400 years ago, in greater details, how Israel and her shabbath-goyims will be smashed in the Middle East by THE Muslim Resistance. 

Abu-Suleyman


NATO Terrorists Target Syria & Algeria



NATO's Pan-Arab Terrorist Blitzkrieg. 
by Tony Cartalucci

August 29, 2012 - Western policy makers admit that NATO's operations in Libya have played the primary role in emboldening Al Qaeda's AQIM faction (Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb). The Fortune 500-funded Brookings Institution's Bruce Riedel in his article, "The New Al Qaeda Menace," admits that AQIM is now heavily armed thanks to NATO's intervention in Libya, and that AQIM's base in Mali, North Africa, serves as a staging ground for terrorist activities across the region.

Image: NATO's intervention in Libya has resurrected listed-terrorist organization and Al Qaeda affiliate, LIFG. It had previously fought in Iraq and Afghanistan, and now has fighters, cash and weapons, all courtesy of NATO, spreading as far west as Mali, and as far east as Syria. The feared "global Caliphate" Neo-Cons have been scaring Western children with for a decade is now taking shape via US-Saudi, Israeli, and Qatari machinations, not "Islam." In fact, real Muslims have paid the highest price in fighting this real "war against Western-funded terrorism."
....

AQIM, like their Libyan counterparts, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) are both listed by the US State Department as "Foreign Terrorist Organizations." Likewise, both the UK Home Office (.pdf, listed as GSPC) and the UN recognize both organizations as terrorists.

Despite this, military intervention in Libya was pursued by the West and condoned by the UN with full knowledge that the militants leading so-called "pro-democracy uprisings" were in fact merely the continuation of decades of violent terrorism carried out by Al Qaeda affiliates. The West had full knowledge of this, primarily because it was Western intelligence agencies arming and supporting these militants for the last 30 years, in Libya's case, while coddling their leaders in Washington and London.

Additionally, the US Army itself meticulously documented foreign terrorists fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, noting that the highest percentage per capita emanated from Libya's cities of Benghazi and Darnah, the so-called "cradle" of 2011's "pro-democracy uprisings" in Libya.

....

What unfolded was a premeditated lie - where placard waving "activists" overnight turned into battle-hardened heavily armed, tank driving, jet flying militants waging a nationwide battle against Libyan leader, Muammar Qaddafi. In reality, it was the fruition of 30 years of covert support the West has poured into militant groups across the region - support that would not end with the fall of Qaddafi.



 
Image: Libyan terrorist manning a tank during NATO's 2011 overthrow of the Libyan government. The media expects the public to believe placard waving peaceful demonstrators had somehow, in just days, transitioned into tank driving, jet flying rebel forces - just like in Hollywood. 
....


LIFG terrorists promptly turned both east to Syria and west to Mali beyond their borders - a logistical matter they had perfected during their operations in Iraq and Afghanistan over the past decade. LIFG commander Abdul Hakim Belhaj, as early as November 2011, arrived on the Turkish-Syrian border to provide cash, weapons, and LIFG terrorist fighters, overseen by Western intelligence along with US funding and arms laundered through Gulf Cooperative Council (GCC) members such as Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Since then Libyan militants have been confirmed to be leading entire brigades of foreign fighters inside Syria.

And as Bruce Riedel of Brookings concedes, these weapons went west to Mali as well. Algeria had feared just such a scenario unfolding with NATO's intervention in Libya - a fear now fully realized. Ironically, Riedel, in August 2011, had tried to make a case for Algeria being "next to fall" in an article titled literally, "Algeria Will Be Next to Fall."

A year ago, Riedel attempted to argue that it would be the so-called "Arab Spring" that would spread into Algeria after having taken root in neighboring Libya. He had eluded to, and it has now become abundantly clear, that by  "Arab Spring," Riedel meant, US-backed subversion, and more specifically NATO-armed Al Qaeda-brand militancy and terrorism.

With the US now openly arming, supporting, and literally "cheering" Al Qaeda in Syria, it is clear that the "War on Terror" is an unprecedented geopolitical fraud perpetuated at the cost of millions of lives destroyed and an incalculable social and economic toll. NATO, with full knowledge of the consequences is literally carving out of North Africa and the Middle East, the so-called "Caliphate" Western leaders had held over their impressionable people's heads as the impetus to perpetually wage global war. Torn from the pages of Orwell's 1984, an artificial war has been created to carry forward corporate-financier machinations both abroad and domestically. The so-called threat to Western civilization is in fact a foreign legion of Western corporate-financier interests, executing Wall Street and London's foreign policy on a global scale where and in a manner traditional Western forces cannot.

NATO's terrorist blitzkrieg across the Arab World will not end in Syria. It will continue, if allowed, into Iran, through the Caucasus Mountains and into Russia, across China's western borders, and even across Southeast Asia. The price for ignorance, apathy, and complicity in supporting the West's so-called "War on Terror" will ironically reap all the horrors and then some in reality, that were promised to us if we didn't fight this "Long War."

Our support of both the political gambits of our politicians, as well as our daily patronage of the corporate-financier interests driving this agenda have already reaped an unprecedented and still growing regional safe haven for terrorists - and as moderate secular governments continue to be undermined and toppled, we can only imagine the blowback, retaliation, and other consequences as this destructive foreign policy unfolds. To imagine that such meddling will not end up being visited back upon us, even if in the form of a false flag attack dwarfing 9/11, would be folly.

Already, we are suffering economic devastation and an increasingly stifling security apparatus at home, and as long as we capitulate to this current agenda instead of asserting a more rational one of our own, it will only get worse.


L’Initiative de la Mosquée Al Aqsaa pour la réconciliation en Syrie – Salah-Eddine Ben Ibrahim Abu Arafat

L'Initiative de la Mosquée Al Aqsaa pour la réconciliation en Syrie - Salahudine Ben Ibrahim
Conférence animée par le Sheykh Salahudine Ben Ibrahim Abu Arafat de Jérusalem ce jeudi 30 août avec des frères de Jérusalem intitulée :

L’initiative de la Mosquée El Aqsaa pour la réconciliation en Syrie et l’appel à tous les musulmans de bien pour arrêter l’effusion de sang.

L’imam Salahudine Ben Ibrahim a – entre autre – déclaré :


“Nous disons aux gens de Syrie qui sont sortis manifester pour le progrès ou le changement, nous disons aux gens censés d’entre eux, le Prophète paix sur Lui a dit : Allah a décrété la bienfaisance pour toute chose. Celui qui doit détruire une maison doit le faire avec excellence, alors imaginez donc celui qui veut le construire ?
Les bonnes choses ne se font que par de bonnes actions, et on ne peut améliorer les choses en détruisant et il n’y pas d’autre attitude (salvatrice) que de se plier à la volonté d’Allah et de renoncer aux pêchers”
Et il a aussi envoyé un message au président syrien Bachar El Assad en disant :
“Nous disons au gouverneur de Syrie, c’est ton propre peuple, tes sujets, leurs enfants sont tes enfants, leurs aînés sont tes aînés et tes semblables, alors sois avenant avec eux et sache qu’Allah est au-dessus de toi comme tu l’es avec eux”
Une bonne partie du message fut aussi adressé aux gens de science (savants) qui ont autorisé l’effusion de sang, en disant :
“Il faut que ceux qui ont incendié la Syrie sachent que les savants sont les héritiers des prophètes et ils n’ont pas à commercer dans les tombes et l’effusion de sang, et qu’ils ne se hâtent pas vers le meurtre mais plutôt ils doivent chercher la réconciliation.
Ces évènements ont commencé en Tunisie comme les vagues de la mer qui se succèdent. Et nous connaissons un groupe de gens à leur tête Al Qaradawi qui se’étaient envolés vers l’Afghanistan afin d’éviter que la statue ne soit pas détruite (ndlr, statue bouddhiste de Bâmiyân, 2001), demandez-leur pourquoi ne s’envolent-ils pas vers la Syrie en se hâtant à vouloir arrêter le courroux des musulmans (entre eux) et leur disant la parole d’Allah : “Craignez Allah”* ?”
Noble Coran 8:01

“Ils t’interrogent au sujet du butin. Dis : “Le butin est à Allah et à Son messager.” Craignez Allah, maintenez la concorde entre vous et obéissez à Allah et à Son messager, si vous êtes croyants.”

Source en arabe

http://rissala.wordpress.com/ 




La strategie israelienne de guerre civile sunnis-shias Iran-pays du golf et la mise en place de nouveaux pantins se reclamant de l'Islaam politique par BHL, Fabius, Netanyahu, Hollande et Sarkozy en Libye et Syrie afin qu'Israel puisse crier au loup et envahir l'Egypte et tous les pays du Golf.

 PLAN DE LA JUIVERIE SIONISTE FRANCAISE POUR ERADIQUER LES AFRO-ARABO-BERBERO-MUSULMANS: 


'TRIPLE CREME' ADLER EXPLIQUE LA STRATEGIE MISE EN PLACE PAR ISRAEL AVEC LE 'PRINTEMPS ARABE' POUR PRENDRE LE CONTROLE DE TOUT LE MOYEN ORIENT. MAIS LES LECTEURS DE CE BLOG L'AURONT DEJA COMPRIS DEPUIS LE 14 JANVIER 2011, OU LE PLAN ISRAELIEN A ETE DECRIT EN DETAIL SUR CE BLOG.

NOTEZ BIEN LA STRATEGIE SIONISTE DE MANIPULATION DE L'ARABIE SAOUDITE, DONT LES SAOUDS SONT DES JUIFS ARABES, ET DU QATAR ET LES LIENS FORTS ET CONTINUS ENTRE AL ASSAD ET LES CLANS IRANIENS AU POUVOIR ET LIES AVEC LE LIKUD DE NETANYAHU, CE SONT LES IRANIENS DE L'AFFAIRE IRAN-CONTRA, DE RAFSANDJANI, MOUSSAVI, KHATAMI AYANT REUSSI A ISOLER AHMADINEJAD QUI REPRESENTE UNE TOUTE PETITE PARTIE DE L'ELITE IRANIENNE REELLEMENT OPPOSEE A L'HEGEMONIE SIONISTE. 

ISRAEL EST LE QATAR ET L'ARABIE SAOUDITE, LA JORDANIE, LE MAROC. DE MEME QU'ISRAEL EST L'ARMEE EGYPTIENNE, ALGERIENNE, SAOUDIENNE, PAKISTANAISE, TURQUE. IL FAUT SAVOIR QUE 90 % DES SUNNITES SONT AU COURANT DE CE PLAN SIONISTE ET QUE L'ILLUSION DU QATAR ET DE L'ARABIE COMME FER DE LANCE DES SUNNITES EST UN MYTHE SIONISTE, CES PAYS SERONT SACRIFIES PAR ISRAEL, CAR ILS ONT ECHOUE A SOULEVER LE MONDE ARABE AVEC EUX MAIS ONT REUSSI A MONTER LE MONDE ARABO-MUSULMAN CONTRE EUX... PAUVRES ADLER, BHL, SARKOZY, HOLLANDE, FABIUS, CRIF... CA SENT LA FIN POUR VOUS. MAIS VOUS POUVEZ TOUJOURS ORGANISER UN NOUVEL 11 SEPTEMBRE NUCLEAIRE A PARIS OU UNE AUTRE OPERATION 'KELKAL' OU 'MERAH'. LA JUIVERIE SIONISTE FRANCAISE A PERDU LA GUERRE. NOUS LES AVONS DETRUIT, CELA SE VERRA CLAIREMENT EN 2015 DE TOUS. LA CRISE SOCIALE ET LA GUERRE QU'ILS ONT DECLENCHE EN FRANCE S'EST RETOURNEE CONTRE EUX, IL NE S'AGIT QUE DE GAGNER DU TEMPS MAINTENANT POUR EUX, D'OU LE FORCING DE L'ADMINISTRATION OBAMA POUR IMPOSER HOLLANDE, CAR LA DEFAITE JUIVE SIONISTE EN FRANCE EST ACQUISE A WASHINGTON. UNE GUERRE EN FRANCE VERRA LA VICTOIRE TOTALE DE LA RESISTANCE MUSULMANE TRES ENCREE DANS LA FRANCE D'EN-BAS ! (AS) 



1 comments:


a b said...
De toute façon le monde entier est sioniste ou contrôlé par eux.

The Yinon Thesis Vindicated: Neocons, Israel, and the Fragmentation of Syria

Israel does not want Assad to be removed or any fake puppets of the CNS, NATO-qatar-saud backed mercenaries-contras to replace him. Israel is playing a long internal civil war making sure that the majority of the Sunnis never get access to kind of military organisation capable of resisting any ground invasion from Tel Aviv, destroying the AGP and Iranian pipelines. The majority of the Syrian people, Sunnis do not believe in the Saudis nor the Qatar, seen as Zionist puppets, nor they believe Russia will help them. Syrians understood clearly these facts as Iraq invasion remains in their minds. Israel will face a military defeat when Netanyahu and Barak will try to grab South of Lebanon and Damascus.  

By Stephen J. Sniegoski,

It is widely realized now that the fall of President Bashar Assad’s regime would leave Syria riven by bitter ethnic, religious, and ideological conflict that could splinter the country into smaller enclaves. Already there has been a demographic shift in this direction, as both Sunnis and Alawites flee the most dangerous parts of the county, seeking refuge within their own particular communities. Furthermore, it is widely believed in Syria that, as the entire country becomes too difficult to secure, the Assad regime will retreat to an Alawaite redoubt in the northern coastal region as a fallback position. link

Syrian Kurds, about ten percent of the country’s population, are also interested in gaining autonomy or joining with a larger Kurdistan. The Syrian Kurdish Democratic Party (PYD)—linked to the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), which has engaged in a separatist insurgency in Turkey’s Kurdish southeast region for nearly three decades—has gained control of key areas in northeast Syria. While Turkey has supported the Syrian opposition, it is terrified of a Kurdish autonomous zone in Syria, believing that it could provide a safe haven for staging attacks into Turkey. Moreover, Kurdish autonomy would encourage separatist sentiment within the Turkish Kurdish minority. Turkey has threatened to invade the border areas of Syria to counter such a development and Turkish armed forces with armor have been sent to Turkey’s border with the Syrian Kurdish region. A Turkish invasion would add further complexities to the fracturing of Syria.

What has not been readily discussed in reference to this break-up of Syria is that the Israeli and global Zionist Right has long sought the fragmentation of Israel’s enemies so as to weaken them and thus enhance Israel’s primacy in the Middle East. While elements of this geostrategic view can be traced back to even before the creation of the modern state of Israel, the concept of destabilizing and fragmenting enemies seems to have been first articulated as an overall Israeli strategy by Oded Yinon in his 1982 piece, “A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties.” Yinon had been attached to the Israeli Foreign Ministry and his article undoubtedly reflected high-level thinking in the Israeli military and intelligence establishment in the years of Likudnik Menachem Begin’s leadership. Israel Shahak’s translation of Yinon’s article was titled “The Zionist Plan for the Middle East.”

In this article, Yinon called for Israel to use military means to bring about the dissolution of Israel’s neighboring states and their fragmentation into a mosaic of homogenous ethnic and sectarian groupings. Yinon believed that it would not be difficult to achieve this result because nearly all the Arab states were afflicted with internal ethnic and religious divisions, and held together only by force. In essence, the end result would be a Middle East of powerless mini-statelets unable to confront Israeli power. Lebanon, then facing divisive chaos, was Yinon’s model for the entire Middle East. Yinon wrote: “Lebanon’s total dissolution into five provinces serves as a precedent for the entire Arab world including Egypt, Syria, Iraq and the Arabian peninsula and is already following that track. The dissolution of Syria and Iraq later on into ethnically or religiously unique areas such as in Lebanon, is Israel’s primary target on the Eastern front in the long run, while the dissolution of the military power of those states serves as the primary short term target.” link

Eminent Middle East historian, Bernard Lewis, who is a Zionist of a rightist hue and one of the foremost intellectual gurus for the neoconservatives, echoed Yinon with an article in the September 1992 issue of “Foreign Affairs” titled “Rethinking the Middle East.” In it, he wrote of a development he called “Lebanonization,” stating “[A] possibility, which could even be precipitated by [Islamic] fundamentalism, is what has of late been fashionable to call ‘Lebanonization.’ Most of the states of the Middle East—Egypt is an obvious exception—are of recent and artificial construction and are vulnerable to such a process. If the central power is sufficiently weakened, there is no real civil society to hold the polity together, no real sense of common identity. . . . The state then disintegrates—as happened in Lebanon—into a chaos of squabbling, feuding, fighting sects, tribes, regions, and parties.” Since Lewis— credited with coining the phrase “clash of civilizations”—has been a major advocate of a belligerent stance for the West against the Islamic states, it would appear that he realized that such fragmentation would be the result of his belligerent policy.

In 1996, the neoconservatives presented to incoming Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu their study “A Clean Break” (produced under the auspices of an Israeli think tank, the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies), which described how Israel could enhance its regional security by toppling enemy regimes. Although this work did not explicitly focus on the fragmentation of states, such was implied in regard to Syria when it stated that “Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq — an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right — as a means of foiling Syria’s regional ambitions.” It added that “Damascus fears that the ‘natural axis’ with Israel on one side, central Iraq and Turkey on the other, and Jordan, in the center would squeeze and detach Syria from the Saudi Peninsula. For Syria, this could be the prelude to a redrawing of the map of the Middle East which would threaten Syria’s territorial integrity.”

David Wurmser authored a much longer follow-up document to “A Clean Break” for the same Israeli think tank, entitled “Coping with Crumbling States: A Western and Israeli Balance of Power Strategy for the Levant.” In this work, Wurmser emphasized the fragile nature of the Middle Eastern Baathist dictatorships in Iraq and Syria in line with Lewis’s thesis, and how the West and Israel should act in such an environment.

In contrast to some of the Western democracies as well as Arab states, Israel did not publicly call for Assad’s removal until a few months ago. This, however, does not mean that the Netanyahu government did not support this outcome. This tardiness has a number of likely reasons, one of which being the fear that an Islamist government would replace Assad that would be even more hostile to Israel and more prone than he to launch reckless attacks. Moreover, instability in a country on Israel’s border is of tremendous concern to its security establishment. It is feared that in such a chaotic condition, Assad’s massive chemical weapons arsenal and advanced surface-to-air missile systems could end up in the hands of terrorist groups like the Lebanese Hezbollah, which would not be hesitant to use them against Israel. link

Unlike the armchair destabilization strategists and the neocons, the actual Israeli leaders, including hardline Likudniks such as Prime Minister Netanyahu, have to be concerned about facing the immediate negative political consequences of their decisions even if they believe that the long-term benefits would accrue to the country. This invariably leads to the exercise of caution in regard to dramatic change. Thus, the concern about the immediate security risks cited above likely had a significant effect on their decision-making.

Furthermore, it could have been counterproductive for Israel to express support for the Syrian opposition in its early stages. For Assad has repeatedly maintained that the opposition is orchestrated by foreign powers, using this argument to justify his brutal crackdown. Since Israel is hated by virtually all elements in the Middle East, its open support of the opposition could have turned many Syrians, and much of the overall Arab world, against the uprising. While Israel did not openly support the armed resistance, there have been claims from reliable sources that Israeli intelligence has been providing some degree of covert support along with other Western intelligence agencies, including that of the United States.

Since May of this year, however, the Israeli government has become open in its support for the overthrow of the Assad regime. In June, Netanyahu condemned the ongoing massacre of Syrian civilians by Assad, blaming the violence on an “Axis of Evil,” consisting of Iran, Syria and Hezbollah. “Iran and Hezbollah are an inseparable part of the Syrian atrocities and the world needs to act against them,” he proclaimed. This inclusion of Iran and Hezbollah illustrates Israel’s goal of using the Syrian humanitarian issue to advance its own national interest.

If the Assad regime were to fall, Israel would certainly be more secure with a splintered congeries of small statelets than a unified Syria under an anti-Israel Islamist regime. Consequently, staunch neoconservative Harold Rhode presents the fragmentation scenario in a positive light in his article, “Will Syria Remain a Unified State?” (July 10, 2012). In contrast to what has been the conventional Western narrative of the uprising against the Assad regime, which presents a heroic Sunni resistance being brutally terrorized by government forces and pro-government Alawite militias, Rhode writes with sympathy for the pro-government non-Sunni Syrian minorities: “In short, what stands behind most of the violence in Syria is the rise of Arab Sunni fundamentalism in its various forms – whether Salafi, Wahhabi, or Muslim Brotherhood. All of those threaten the very existence of the Alawites, the Kurds, and other members of the non-Sunni ethnic and religious groups.

“It is therefore much easier to understand why the ruling Alawites feel they are fighting a life and death battle with the Sunnis, and why they believe they must spare no effort to survive. It also explains why most of Syria’s other minorities – such as the Druze, Ismailis, and Christians – still largely support the Assad regime.”
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3157/syria-unified-state

For a short aside, the neoconservative background of Harold Rhode is of considerable relevance, providing further evidence for the much denied neocon support for the fragmentation of Israel’s enemies. (The mainstream view is that the neocons are naïve idealists whose plans to transform dictatorships into model democracies invariably go awry.) Rhode, a longtime Pentagon official who was a specialist on the Middle East, was closely associated with neocon stalwarts Michael Ledeen, Paul Wolfowitz, and Richard Perle. He was also a protégé of Bernhard Lewis, with Lewis dedicating his 2003 book, “The Crisis of Islam,” to him. Rhode served as a Middle East specialist for Douglas Feith, Undersecretary of Defense for Policy during the administration of George W. Bush, where he was closely involved with the Office of Special Plans, which provided spurious propaganda to promote support for the war on Iraq. Rhode was a participant in the Larry Franklin affair, which involved dealings with Israeli agents, though Rhode was not charged with any crime. Alan Weisman, the author of the biography of Richard Perle, refers to Rhode as an “ardent Zionist” (“Prince of Darkness: Richard Perle,” p.146), more pro-Israel than Perle, which takes some doing since the latter has been accused of handing classified material to the Israelis. Rhode is currently a fellow with the ultra-Zionist Gatestone Institute, for which he wrote the above article.

Obviously the very removal of the Assad regime would be a blow against Israel’s major enemy, Iran, since Syria is Iran’s major ally. Significantly, Assad’s Syria has provided a conduit for arms and assistance from Iran to Hezbollah and, to a lesser extent, Hamas, to use against Israel. If Israel and Iran had gone to war, these arms would have posed a significant threat to the Israeli populace. Moreover, a defanged Hezbollah would not be able to oppose Israeli military incursions into south Lebanon or even Syria.

A fragmented Syria removes the possible negative ramifications of Assad’s removal since it would mean that even if the Islamists should replace Assad in Damascus they would only have a rump Syrian state to control, leaving them too weak to do much damage to Israel and forcing them to focus their attention on the hostile statelets bordering them. Moreover, Israel is purportedly contemplating military action to prevent Assad’s chemical weapons from falling into the hands of anti-Israel terrorists. With such a divided country there is no powerful army capable of standing up to an Israeli military incursion.

The benefits accruing to Israel from the downfall of the Assad regime and the concomitant sectarian fragmentation and conflict in Syria go beyond the Levant to include the entire Middle East region. For sectarian violence in Syria is likely to cause an intensification of the warfare between Sunnis and Shiites throughout the entire Middle East region. Iran might retaliate against Saudi Arabia’s and Qatar’s support for the Syrian opposition by fanning the flames of Shiite Muslim revolution in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia’s oil-rich and majority Shiite Eastern Province. Both areas have witnessed intermittent periods of violent protest and brutal government suppression since the Arab Spring of 2011. And Iraq remains a tinderbox ready to explode into ethno-sectarian war among the Shiites, Sunnis, and Kurds, with violence already on an uptick since the formal departure of American troops in December 2011.

In assessing the current regional situation, American-born Barry Rubin, professor at the Interdisciplinary Center (Herzliya, Israel) and director of its Global Research in International Affairs Center, writes in the Jerusalem Post (“The Region: Israel is in good shape,” July 15, 2012) : “The more I think about Israel’s security situation at this moment, the better it looks.” He goes on to state: “By reentering a period of instability and continuing conflict within each country, the Arabic-speaking world is committing a self-induced setback. Internal battles will disrupt Arab armies and economies, reducing their ability to fight against Israel. Indeed, nothing could be more likely to handicap development than Islamist policies.” link

It should be noted that the “period of instability and continuing conflict” in the Middle East region has been the result of regime change and is in line with the thinking of Oded Yinon who, along with the other aforementioned geostrategic thinkers, pointed out that the major countries of the Middle East were inherently fissiparous and only held together by authoritarian regimes.

America’s removal of Saddam in a war spearheaded by the pro-Israel neoconservatives served to intensify Sunni-Shiite regional hostility and, in a sense, got the destabilization ball rolling. Iran is targeted now, and Israel and its neocon supporters seek to make use of dissatisfied internal elements, political and ethnic—the radical MEK, democratic secularists, monarchists, Kurds, Arabs, Baluchis, and Azeris— to bring down the Islamic regime. And while Saudi Arabia is currently serving Israeli interests by opposing Iran, should the Islamic Republic of Iran fall, Israel and their supporters would likely turn to Saudi Arabia’s dismemberment, seeking the severance of the predominantly Shiite, oil-rich Eastern Province, with some neocons already having made such a suggestion—e.g., Max Singer, Richard Perle, and David Frum (schemes which have been put on ice while Israel and its supporters have focused on Iran). If everything went according to plan, the end result would be a Middle East composed of disunited states, or mini-states, involved in intractable, internecine conflict, which would make it impossible for them to confront Israeli power and to provide any challenge to Israel’s control of Palestine. The essence of Yinon’s geostrategic vision of Israeli preeminence would be achieved.

Best,
Stephen Sniegoski

OPERATION MERAH : Sarkozy, Mangoux et Netanyahu auraient liquide le vice-consul algerien de Gao. La DGSE pousse la guerre dans les rues de France

Corbin de Mangoux controlant le MUJAO, groupe cree a l'origine et finance par le DRS du juif sioniste algerien Mohamed Mediene, dit Tewfik, a l'origine du demantelement de l'Algerie, mais repris par les services francais a travers les services qataris et emiratis, libyens tout comme le GIA-AQMI, affirme avoir liquide le vice-consul algerien de Gao.  


MISE A JOUR (Lundi 3 Septembre 2012, 10H50 GMT): Les pedo-pornophiles racistes, mythomanes et incompetents de la guestapo du CRIF a Levallois-Perret repondent a mon post dans le journal le Monde, tenu par la racaille sioniste Israelewicz, qui a pris 2 millions d'euros pour plebisciter les juifs sionistes d'Algerie il y a quelques semaines, voir ici. La quenelle passe mal apparementAllez un peu de courage racailles juifistes, faites nous de beaux attentats avec des milliers de morts, qu'on en finisse avec vous. (AS)


C'est le site algerien TSA qui l'affirme, voir ici, mais nos sources Touaregs ne confirment rien pour le moment.  Il y a plus de 72 heures, j'ai recu une information venant de sources tres fiables au Maroc ou Sarkozy, en total panique, cherchait  la protection de l'etat francais, 10 gardes du corps ca lui suffit pas!  Car selon lui, selon la DGSE,  un commando 'd'islamistes algeriens' se serait infiltre, la bas pour le liquider. Alors que la veritable raison, etait que les juges francais veulent l'entendre, voir l'arreter,  au sujet des affaires de corruptions et de terrorisme en France. 48 heures plus tard, Corbin de Mangoux et Patrick Clavar ordonnaient au MUJAO et a AQMI, qu'ils controlent a 100 %, de rompre les negociations a la derniere minute, pour la liberation des ' 4 derniers otages algeriens' du consulat de Gao, dans le nord du Mali. 

Sarkozy a demande la protection immediate de la France et il tenterait de fuir vers le Gabon, car les juges francais ne s'accommodent pas de l'immunite marocaine donnee a Sarkozy en temps que 'conseiller special' du roitelet juifiste de la famille Glaoui de Marrakech. Une famille juive sioniste de tyrants qui regne et terrorise le Maroc avec l'aide des services francais et israeliens.

Pour rappel, lors des dernieres elections presidentielles, Sarkozy, Squarcini, Mangoux, Gueant, Guaino, Bajolet, Molins, Hauteclocques et Boillon, avec les reseaux du CRIF et de la maison mossad-pasqua (Gladio-OTAN) ont organise les meurtres de militaires a Toulouse, Montauban et d'une famille d'orthodoxes juifs et d'une mere algerienne dans l'Essone pour permettre a Sarkozy d'etre re-elu et declencher une guerre civile contre les Musulmans, ceci afin de positionner la France aux cotes d'Israel lors de l'attaque sur l'Iran dont l'invasion du Liban et du Sud de la Syrie n'est que la premiere phase. 

Nous etions les seuls sur ce blog et sur le net a annoncer une attaque israelienne sur la Syrie, le Liban puis l'Iran pour Fevrier-Mars 2012. Or Martin Hindyk, conseiller a l'administration Obama, a clairement reproche a Netanyahu et Barak de ne pas avoir lance l'attaque en Mars 2012, voir ici. Le general Dempsey ayant meme retire les troupes US en annoncant ne pas vouloir 'etre complice' de la follie des guerres messianiques israeliennes, lire ici. Sarkozy pensait reellement que l'attaque aurait lieu. La DCRI avait prepare, depuis le mois de Septembre 2011, avec une partie du DRS algerien, un attentat massif contre une ambassade americaine a Tunis, ou a Paris, et ce n'etait pas celle de l'Inde qui etait visee. Les juges peuvent le verifier aupres de l'ambassade US a Paris, nous avons intercepte leurs communications et celles de Squarcini. 

La encore, nous etions les seuls sur tout le net a avoir annonce cela. Squarcini et Hautecloques, deux mafieux de la maison mossad-pasqua, ont fait assassine Mohamed Merah en l'accusant de tous les maux. Pendant que Sarkozy echoua a raquetter les generaux DAF d'Alger, car Gaddafi avait saisi 150 millions d'euros, sur les 300 millions des retro-commissions blanchies descontrats SAWARI2, Myksa, Agosta, par l'emir du Qatar. Ayant echoue a raqueter les generaux DAF franco-algero-israeliens pour financer sa campagne 2012 apres l'arrestation du Dr Mourad Dhina, ce qui fut un fiasco total pour la justice corrompue francaise et les services francais qui ont du battre en retraite immediatement. Defaite magistrale, avec la liberation de Adlene Hicheur qui finit d'humilier les juifs sionistes francais et Squarcini mis sous pression par nos soins. En attendant l'enquete sur les bombes nucleaires sales de Breivik et ses liens avec des agents de la DCRI en France. La guestapo du CRIF a Levallois-Perret n'a pas fini de boire le calice jusqu'a la lie. De Breivik nous allons aide les juges a remonte au prochain 11 septembre nucleaire, qui doit servir a Israel pour envahir l'Iran et detruire les pays du Golf dans une guerre sunnis-shias.

Sarkozy etait lui meme pris a son propre jeu, voyant qu'Israel ne lancait pas d'attaque, il tenta de sauver sa tete a la va-vite et il commit des erreures qui le perdirent. La DGSE envoya une femme anglo-pakistanaise a mon domicile pour menacer ma femme si je n'arretais pas immediatement de publier sur le deroulement des operations et les possibles frappes sur Londres, avec toute sorte de menaces. 

Netanyahu ayant annule l'operation. Il serait interessant de voir pourquoi Israel n'a pas attaque comme prevu.... et la nous aurions beaucoup a dire, mais tout ce que je peux ecrire, c'est que nous tenons les services francais et l'etat francais de bas en haut et qu'ils sont responsables! Bande de racistes, mythomanes, incompetents! Mais Netanyahu perdra les elections de Septembre 2012 si il ne tente pas d'envahir le sud Liban ou au minimum faire croire au monde qu'il a fait tomber Al Assad en Syrie, donc attendez-vous a des attaques plus severes sur la Syrie dans les 24-48 heures. Nous ne pensons pas que Al Assad resiste reellement au sionisme, il fait leur jeu notamment avec la creation du grand kurdistan, comme Tarek Azziz, Tewfik et Gaddafi qui ont offert leurs pays a l'ennemi, laissant les peuples se faire massacrer, empechant que les Musulmans ne puissent se defendre, pillant leurs richesses. Le jeu irano-likud prendra fin avec l'invasion de l'Iran en 2014 voir 2015. Mais seul Allah swt sait. Shimon Peres et Kadima, si la criminelle de guerre Tzivi Lipni gagne les elections dans 2 semaines, proposeront avec la Turquie un 'plan de paix' pour consolider la domination sioniste sur tous les pays Arabes en pleine guerre civile. Le Hamas parle d'une demande sioniste de 10 ans de treves sans hostilites et Peres a signe la dessus, mais personne ne croit plus les israeliens qui seront contenus avant que le temple de leur machiah-Dajjal ne soit construit en 2020. Ce nouveau faux plan de paix ne peut se faire que si Al Assad s'en va, et le ministre des affaires etrangeres qatari affirme, en prive, que Al Assad a accepte les milliards du Qatar pour partir, certains disent 6.5 milliards. Des tunisiens affirment la meme chose depuis la fin du mois de Juin. Info ou Intox, nous verrons bien!   

Pris a son propre piege et humilie par des 'Franco-Algeriens'. Tu peux pas savoir comme on a jouit de te voir en faillite l'israelien, on attendait juste une bombe de plus dans un metro ou un bus apres l'operation Merah ou la frappe sur les americains, pour vous massacrer, mais tu le sais ca l'israelien. La DGSE precipita l'invasion du Mali pour faire diversion, sans en avertir Washington, qui furieux, utiliserent les reseaux de la CIA en France pour abattre Sarkozy, la marionnette ayant perdue les pedales, et mettre Hollande. Sinon, Sarkozy passait avec 'l'operation Merah' et le coup d'etat au Mali avec le soutien de toute la classe politique. 

Apres la Libye, Sarkozy tentait donc de menacer les harkis d'Alger, de demembrer l'Algerie, si ils n'enterraient pas Mohamed Merah, un innocent, rahima Allah, en Algerie et si ils ne l'aidaient pas a rester au pouvoir en l'aidant financierement. Je ne parle meme pas des malettes ayant finance Montebourg, Ayrault ou Hollande... On s'en servira le moment venu insha Allah.  

Comprenant que les americains et les europeens avaient deja acte le remplacement de Mohamed Mediene, en creant de nouveaux faux groupes islamiques pour renverser les groupes tenus par Tewfik, et en prenant le controle total du MUJAO et de AQMI, par l'entremise des qataris et des emiratis, en destabilisant le nord du Mali, Sarkozy croyait avoir reussi a limiter la casse. Mais, les services francais avaient le plus de mal au monde a contenir la revolte des Musulmans en France et du peuple francais, ayant compris le but politique de l'assassinat de Mohamed Merah. Tewfik avait lui aussi compris qu'il etait devenu obsolete pour les interets franco-israeliens et americains. Il demanda avec Ouyahia l'invasion du Mali par l'Algerie et Tewfik s'empara de l'affaire Merah en menacant aussitot de reveler la verite sur 'l'affaire Merah', croyant manipuler les 'Franco-Algeriens' de France. Alors qu'il mene une guerre d'extermination du peuple Algerien au nom des interets israeliens dans la region depuis que la DST et l'agent franco-israelien Larbi Belkheir l'ont installe a la tete du DRS.

Quelques heures apres,  la DGSE faisait enlever 7 'diplomates algeriens' dans le consulat de Gao, dans le Nord Mali. Ce jour, il est clair et evident que l'etat francais cherche la guerre et le demembrement de tout le Maghreb-Sahel pour mieux le recoloniser car etant en total faillite et l'annexer au l'Euro-Reich ou marche transatlantique sioniste pour 2015. Les 10 millions de Musulmans vivant en France doivent maintenant clairement afficher des reflexes de survie et d'auto-defense, s'acheter armes et munitions, car Netanyahu, Sarkozy, Clavar, Valls et Mangoux veulent les exterminer au nom de la defense des interets franco-israeliens au Maghreb-Sahel et les reduire au silence afin de pouvoir mener une derniere attaque sur l'Iran et prendre le controle absolu de tout le Moyen Orient. 

Nous n'avons absolument rien avoir avec les harkis d'Alger, nous sommes agresses par les services franco-anglo-americano-germano-OTAN-israeliens et nous leur avons donne une bonne lecon, n'est ce pas Squarcini, l'ane du mossad en France? Il etait plus que normal que des enfants des peuples Musulmans du Maghreb-Sahel detruisent la maison mossad-pasqua et le CRIF qui a le controle total de l'interieur, la defense, le quai d'Orsay, et la justice. Corbin de Mangoux ne fait que nous renforcer, maintenant voyons si Tewfik liquidera l'ambassadeur francais a Alger ou prendra son telephone pour menacer de faire sauter la DCRI. Ce n'est pas pour rien que depuis 15 jours je parle de guerre en France. 

Entretuez-vous chiens de Sion, la victoire pour la Resistance Musulmane Afro-Arabo-Berbero-Maghrebine insha Allah 

Que la France-Israel perisse de la pire des manieres!

Abu-Suleyman
Islamic-Intelligence
  

P.S: Ce sont avec les armes que la DGSE a largue sur la Libye et la DCRI a distribue 'aux clans' qu'elle controle, dont les jeunes marmots a Marseille s'entretuent. Il y a une volonte manifeste de Mangoux et Valls, Clavar de provoquer une guerre dans le sud de la France dans le cadre 'israelien du clash des civilisations', lire ici. Voyez comme les banques israeliennes Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan a Londres et Washington pauperisent les grecs, italiens, espagnols, et portuguais pour mieux s'en servir comme chaire a canon  et les envoyer dans les nouvelles croisades messianiques de Tel Aviv, apres le prochain 11 septembre nucleaire en Europe...  

Comment la mafia juive sioniste francaise au sein des ministeres de la defense et de l'interieur, innonde le sud de la France avec de l'opium Afghan afin de provoquer une guerre dans les banlieues entre dealers, approvisiones, armes et manipules par la DCRI et ses clans corses

LE PLAN FRANCO-ISRAELIEN POUR MATER ET ERADIQUER LES AFRO-ARABO-BERBERO-MUSULMANS EN VUE DE L'ATTAQUE FINALE SUR LE MAGHREB-SAHEL, LE MOYEN ORIENT ET L'IRAN EN 2014/15

La base  militaire francaise a Abu Dhabi, Emirats, ou la DGSE a pris ses nouveaux quartiers, joue un role central dans les trafics de drogue entre l'Afghanistan, l'Inde, Pakistan et le Sud de la France

Il est un secret de polichinelle de savoir que l'OTAN est la structure qui sert de logistique aux americains, israeliens, francais, anglais, allemands pour convoyer l'opium Afghan vers l'Europe et les USA, lire ici

Les americains utilisent leur base au Kosovo, Camp Bondsteel, pour revendre la drogue aux mafias locales, italiennes, corses, juives d'Europe de l'Est, ceci se fait sur la place de Vienne en Autriche. L'argent est ensuite blanchi a Zurich et innonde les comptes des partis politiques americains, dont le Parti Republicain et les reseaux de John McCain principalement, cote Democrates, les reseaux de Joe Liebermann, l'AIPAC, la maison Bush et la maison Clinton. 


Pour ce qui est des francais, la drogue Afghane est convoyee vers la base militaire, ou la DGSE a installe son QG, des Emirats Arabes Unis. L'opium est transportee par avion vers le Tchad, le sud de la Libye, mais egalement au Mali, Niger ou les reseaux de sefarades franco-maghrebins tunisiens, algeriens, marocains, libyens, comme on l'a vu dans l'affaire Neyret, voir ici, et ici font remonter la drogue, qu'ils melangent avec les reseaux de Hashish  dans les zones tribales Zwei, Touaregs, Berberes, Bedouins, Arabes, vers le sud de l'Europe. 

Ce sont les mafieux sefarades et pieds noirs, installes en Corse, et dans le sud a Marseille, Toulon, Perpignan, Montpellier, Narbonne, Sete, Nice, Lyon, Grenoble, Clermont, Toulouse, Bordeaux et Paris, a l'interieur de l'etat francais (police; DCRI, douanes; PAF, armee; DGSE, justice) qui avec la mafia juive sioniste francaise originaire du Maghreb, tirent les ficelles et les plus gros gains pour leurs reseaux politico-mafieux. Le plus gros clan de dealer etant celui de la maison mossad-Charles Pasqua, la 'french-connexion' voir la video suivante

Ces sionistes  ont des connections avec l'armee US et l'OTAN, les cartels colombiens et mexicians, ceux de Miami, et ils sont a la tete d'une puissante pieuvre mafieuse au coeur de Marseille, et l'arriere pays nicois, qui a la main mise sur tout ce qui rentre dans les ports, aeroports, douanes francais, qu'ils soient civils ou militaires. Actuellement, la maison mossad-pasqua est a la peine, Pasqua tente de sauver sa tete sur son fauteuil roulant, pour cela, il menace de guerre la France, si la justice met son nez dans ses reseaux et affaires de retro-commissions, terrorisme, liant son poulain Sarkozy et son maitre Balladur. Guaino est un pur produit Pasqua, c'est son perroquet prefere, et il a une grande gueule ce Guaino, en privee et au telephone, c'est lui qui manage le bloc identitaire a Nice. Estrosi, Mariani, Squarcini, Mangoux, Gueant et Hortefeuj sont aussi des larbins de Pasqua. lire ici.

Pasqua ordonne a Squarcini et Corbin de Mangoux, Sarkozy. C'est le chikour en chef, il pense les operations comme 'l'operation Merah', qui est une pale copie de 'l'operation Kelkal' de 1995, c'est lui qui a monte ca de toutes pieces, son second fils spirituel n'est en fait que la courroie de transmission DRS algerien-israel-Gladio-OTAN. Pasqua, comme une bonne partie du Front National dans le sud, sont du Gladio-OTAN, mais ca on va en reparler abondamment par la suite cette annee insha Allah. Pasqua, Marchiani et Mitterand, donc Hollande de facto, ont monte la guerre civile en Algerie et le coup d'etat de 1992 avec leurs DAF, pour que leurs reseaux politico-mafieux et loges maconniques puissent continuer a vivre du pillage des peuples Afro-Maghrebins.

Voici donc le plan, qui n'est que la repetition des emeutes de Londres l'annee derniere. Lire ici 

Le Magheb-Sahel est une region immense et tres riches en ressources minieres et hydrocarbures de toutes sortes, le gaz principalement, mais egalement de l'eau, lire ici. Les reseaux de la France-Israel ont toujours maintenus une presence militaire secrete soit par l'intermediaire des services au Maghreb, qu'elle noyotte, comme le DRS ou le Makhzen, ou bien par les armees Mauritanienne, Nigerienne ou Malienne, tenues par la DGSE et les reseaux mossad-pasqua, lire ici . Ces trois derniers pays sont tous sous la coupe du ministere de la defense francais et de la DGSE, qui y organise coups d'etat sur coups d'etat.

 La DGSE, ayant maintenant entrepris avec les forces speciales qataries, qu'elle forme et les emiratis, libyens de s'attaquer au Maghreb dans le cadre de son annexion dans le marche transatlantique, tout comme le Moyen Orient, la Caspienne, dont la date butoire est 2015. Voir ici la strategie de l'OTAN-Israel pour annexer le monde Arabo-Berbero-Musulman, pour cela, il faut gagner la guerre du controle des faux groupes en organisant des fausses prises d'otages permettant a l'armee francaise de re-occuper officiellement le Niger, Mali. Puis, prendre le controle des faux groupes dont le GIA-AQMI, MUJAO et les retourner contre ses createurs algeriens par exemple dont on a plus besoin et qui sont devenus obsoletes, voir l'enlevement des diplomates algeriens de Gao au Mali. L'un des buts des fausses prises d'otage dans cette region, sous couvert de terrorisme, est d'imposer aux americains la presence militaire francaise comme  absolument indispensable dans cette ancienne region coloniale francaise, meme sous le chapeau de l'OTAN, pour ne pas perdre definitivement pied. Apparement  l'AFRICOM ne voit pas du tout les choses sous le meme angle.

Depuis la crise de 2007-2008 aux Etats -Unis, les experts estiment entre 750 a 1200 milliards de dollars l'argent de la drogue blanchie dans les banques en faillites en Europe et aux USA, lire ici 

Ce fut un cadeau divin pour les occidentaux et un soulagement de pouvoir trouver des fonds pour continuer a faire tourner le systeme bancaire capitaliste en faillite et sous perfusion. Mais tres rapidement les plus grandes agglomerations europeenes et americaines ont vu leur marches locaux totalement inondes de drogue afghane, syntethiques, hash, marijuana de toutes parts et sur tous les marches.

En 2010, un rapport de la police anglaise,  a Londres met le feu aux poudres, les nouveaux reseaux de dealers devenus surpuissants pourraient deranger le deroulement des jeux olympiques. La drogue en Angleterre est convoyee par l'OTAN et ses larbins anglais depuis le sud de l'Espagne et le Portugal, principalement. Depuis le Danemark et les Pays-Bas au Nord. La surabondance de drogues en Ireland du Nord notamment et a Londres a vu la mulitplication des reseaux, qui se battaient pour 'leurs territoires', comme en France en region parisienne, et partout en Europe, Berlin, Rome, Barcelone.

Voyant la situation se deteriorer tres rapidement et la baisse des effectifs de securite due a la crise, le gouvernement britannique monta un plan pour reprendre le controle des choses a la mi 2010 et en profita pour passer encore plus de lois liberticides pour renforcer son controle dictatorial sur la societe la plus fliquee de la planete. Fin 2010, 'la rarefaction' de la drogue provoqua une augmentation des prix, moins de clients, moins de business, plus de guerre de dealers et gangs. L'arrogance ou la conspiration de certains milieux de flics, impliques dans les trafics, les poussa a un meurtre du jeune Mark Duggan dans le quartier de Tottenham, a Londres, qui provoqua un debut de guerre civile a Londres et en Angleterre et la mise en application du plan gouvernemental comme par enchantement. 

C'est sur ce plan que se base actuellement la mafia juive sioniste francaise au pouvoir et dans l'opposition pour demarrer la guerre en France. Parallelement et tres bizarrement, Valls continue 'd'expulser des Roms', c'est en fait la continuation des plans Sarkozy, qui devaient mettre en branle la machine gouvernementale des camps de concentrations appeles de 'retention' en France, voir ici 'Operation Grenoble' et mes informations la dessus, en se servant des Roms comme excuse primaire, puis de la guerre 'de la drogue', des operations false flag de terrorisme, pour cibler les populations dans les banlieues, comme seconde excuse officielle pour enfin isoler et mettre principalement les populations Afro-Maghrebines Musulmanes, immigrees dans des camps de concentration, voir des cites-concentrationnaires de type Gaza en 2014/15. 

Ce plan sioniste est en marche, son but est de vilifier les Musulmans et les populations de banlieues, dans le but de les mettre sous silence, provoquer un clash des civilisations dans le sud de la France, avant la prise finale du Maghreb-Sahel par l'OTAN-Israel et le demantelement des pays d'origines de 90% de l'immigration en France, puis de lancer la derniere attaque sur l'Iran et le Khaleej. 

Demandez a n'importe quel ancien dealer, ils vont diront tous ceci, les fonctionnaires de l'etat francais, les gouvernants locaux ou nationaux profitent tous de cette manne de la drogue, lire ici les temoignages confirmant la corruption de l'administration francaise a tous les niveaux qui recoit des enveloppes des clans mafieux en haut, comme celles de petits revendeurs locaux d'en bas, des salaires pouvant atteindre 10 000 euros en cash a Marseille pour certains flics, prefets et autres racistes mythomanes, incompetents a la DCRI,  ou la DGSE. Les liens ouverts entre les services francais et la drogue en Guyane et en Afrique, c'est ici

Les plans sionistes sont tres clairs, la mafia juive sioniste de l'etat francais est la seule responsable...

Abu-Suleyman
Islamic-intelligence    
    

2 comments:

scredman313777 said...
ce qui est marrant c est de voir la façon dont l affaire clearstream, karachi, bettencourt se déroule, le temps que les juges mettent histoire que les preuves s effacent et l attente d une guerre généralisée pour acquitter toute la politique!! ça sent vraiment mauvais, autant sous Sarkozy que sous hollande!! aucune justice, les médias racontent que de la merde, maquillent, travestissent l info, mettent en forme des pseudos règlements de comptes visant a protéger ceux qui les ont monter en l air!! quand a tout les toxicos qui bossent pour l ump et Israël, faut faire bien attention, des vrais caméléons!! ils se font griller, change d attitude, se remettre un masque puis ré attaquent 1 an après tellement leurs mensonges et leur passé risquent de compromettre leur image!! pitoyable l info, le déroulement des événements après le printemps arabe, mais si on regarde bien, tout ce qui se passe en ce moment était prévu depuis le 11 septembre et même depuis le plan Manhattan d avant la guerre mondiale de 39 45.. entre kabbale, mort de masse, génocide précis, cadastre biblique sionisé et maitres du monde, y a juste a suivre le sillon spirituel et tu devines toute la suite de leur plan machiavélique, de vrais nasillards dans leur obscurantisme et ce dans tout les gouvernements d Europe et leurs valets! il est évident que ça va péter sous peu avec des motifs encore bien spéciaux!! la guerre civile est toute proche, 1 er missile sur la Syrie de la part de l alliance et l Europe entre en guerre civile en même temps que la guerre mondiale va se déclencher pays par pays! quand la haine se propage, tout le monde devient sauvage!
corsu said...
pierre yves veyrat ! le front national est le seul parti antisioniste ,les lepen sont amis avec l'iran et la palestine voir sur internet :1 les antisionistes doivent voter marine lepen 2 marine lepen ,antisemite ? (elle est juste antisioniste pas antisemite) 3 marine lepen ,le discours fondateur contre l'oligarchie ,la banque et la finance 4 lepen soutien la palestine et l'iran ! voir aussi l'association des lepen :sos enfant d'irak ,les lepen aident financierement les enfants d'irak et de palestine avec souvent l'argent du front national !

Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire